In re Hawkins

502 N.W.2d 770 (Minn. 1993).

SYLLABI/SYLLABUS

In disciplinary proceeding, the Supreme Court held that attorney’s disregard of court rules and lack
of writing skills warrant public reprimand but do not warrant suspension.

FACTS

On five occasions, respondent failed to file amendment lists of creditors as required by Local
Bankruptcy Rules. On four occasions, respondent failed to include the proof of service required by
Local Bankruptcy Rules, when filing amended lists of creditors, and at least twice respondent filed
amended schedules of exempt property that did not comply with rule.

Respondent also failed to comply with Local Bankruptcy Rules, in attempting to withdraw from
representation. He filed a motion asking for permission to withdraw but it was untimely and the
bankruptcy trustee obtained dismissal for failure of the debtor and respondent to appear at
creditors meeting.

ISSUE

Whether or not Hawkins be suspended as a lawyer due to his lack of writing skills?

RULING

No, Hawkins will not be suspended as a lawyer due to his lack of writing skills.

In disciplinary proceeding, the Supreme Court held that attorney’s disregard of court rules and lack
of writing skills warrant public reprimand but do not warrant suspension.

FALLO

Respondent Patrick W. Hawkins is hereby publicly reprimanded for unprofessional conduct. He is

ordered to pay costs and disbursements incurred in this proceeding in the amount of 250 dollars.
Within two years after issuance of this opinion respondent shall successfully compete the following
described CLE or other educational programs and shall report quarterly to Director his progress in
complying with these educational requirements.

1.) A program on bankruptcy rules, or if none is available, on the law of bankruptcy.

2.) A program of at least 10 hours in legal writing; and
3.) A program of at least 5 hours on law office management.
Public reprimand with conditions imposed.