Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0169-4332(17)31960-8
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.305
Reference: APSUSC 36505
Please cite this article as: Tianming Li, Yuanyuan Xu, Feng Yang, Chao Zhang, Chuanxi
Yang, Zhencui Sun, Hao Zhang, Xiaobo Yuan, Tingyin Ning, Cheng Yang, Self-
assembly of the stretchable AuNPs@MoS2@GF substrate for the SERS application,
Applied Surface Sciencehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.305
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
Self-assembly of the stretchable AuNPs@MoS2@GF substrate for the
SERS application
Tianming Li a,1, Yuanyuan Xua,b,1, Feng Yanga,b,1, Chao Zhang a, Chuanxi Yangc,
Zhencui Sund, Hao Zhanga, Xiaobo Yuana, Tingyin Ninga, and Cheng Yanga,b
a School of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, People’s Republic of China
b Institute of Materials and Clean Energy, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, People’s Republic of China
c China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China
d School of Science, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250023, People’s Republic of China
Highlights:
An ingenious AuNPs@MoS2@G Foam hybrids are fabricated by us in a gentle
and simple way.
The AuNPs@MoS2@GF is proposed as stretchable, strong and sensitive
SERS-based three-dimensional sensor.
The stretching up to 100% has almost no effect to the SERS performance of
AuNPs@MoS2@GF.
Such stretchable substrate can directly be used as an ultrasensitive swab to
detect the molecules on surfaces of any shape.
Corresponding author at: School of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan
250014, People’s Republic of China.
1
These authors contributed equally
1. Introduction
2. Experimental methods
(1) Nickel foam are used and putted into the quartz tube of the furnace. (2)
Double-pump system are used to decrease the pressure to the 10-3 Pa. H2 with the flow
of 50 sccm was then piped in the tube to remove the remaining nickel oxide when the
temperature reached 300 ℃ (3) When the temperature of the quartz tube increases to
the 1000 ℃, CH4 with the flow of 50 sccm was introduced into the tube for different
growth time.
(1) 0.05g ATTM mixed with 5ml DFM are sued to prepare (NH4)2MoS4 precursor.
(2) Graphene@NF are soaked it into the (NH4)2MoS4 precursor for 10 seconds and
spin-coated to enable the solution cover it evenly. (3) Annealing process with 500℃
for 90 minutes are used to form the MoS2@Graphene@NF.
(1) prestretching elastomer, which was affixed to the edge of a plastic culture dish,
are covered quickly and horizontally onto the floating flexible AuNPs@MoS2@GF. (2)
elastomer, coated with AuNPs@MoS2@GF, are uplifted slowly with an oblique angle.
(3)remove the elastomer from the plastic culture dish to relax naturally.
The Raman instrument used in this study was Horiba HR Evolution 800 with
excitation by a laser (532 nm). The laser beam was focused on a sample of about 1
μm in size. For each sample, the SERS spectra on display were the average value of
spectra of three different positions of the substrate. The SERS measurements were
performed from at least 8 random locations that were more than 3 mm apart with an
accumulation time of 10 s. If there is no special instruction, the mentioned Raman
spectra are expressed in terms of average spectra.
Two ends of the stretchable AuNPs@MoS2@GF was immobilized on the fixed and
movable ends of the controller respectively (which is shown in Fig. 4a). Stretching
length and times were set up by adjusting the controller. When the stretching process
was ended and AuNPs@MoS2@GF is taken down from the motor motion controller,
Raman spectra were collected after it shrinked to the original length.
images of MoS2@G@Ni foam. The inset (b1) and (b2) are TEM images of MoS2 and Graphene
respectively; (c) SEM images of AuNPs@MoS2@G@Ni foam ((c) and the inset, inset (b3)) under
different magnification; (d) and (e) SEM images of the stretchable AuNPs@MoS2@GF under
different magnification, insets (e1) and (e2) are TEM images of the AuNPs; Energy spectrum
SEM and TEM were used for the morphology characterization of the different
substrates, as shown in Fig. 2. The morphologies of MoS2 and Graphene are
characterized by TEM images (shown in the inset (1), (2) of Fig. 2(b)), which
demonstrated the MoS2@G@Ni foam was prepared. There are not the obviously
differences of the foam-like network substrates without etching (Ni foam (Fig. 2(a)
and the inset, MoS2@G@Ni foam (b) and AuNPs@MoS2@G@Ni foam (inset of (b))
under lower magnification. It can be easily observed that denser AuNPs are formed on
the surface of the MoS2@G@Ni foam, shown in Fig. 2(c). After Ni scaffold was
carefully removed by immersing the substrate into the hot FeCl3 solution, a monolith
of a continuous and interconnected AuNPs@MoS2@GF 3D network, was obtained
and shown in the Fig. 2(d) and Fig. 2(e). Unlike the flat skeleton
AuNPs@MoS2@G@Ni foam without the nickel etching, stretchable
AuNPs@MoS2@GF appear collapse drastically, causing many wrinkles, imperfection
and edges without the support of nickel skeleton. The AgNPs density of the
stretchable AuNPs@MoS2@GF (shown in Fig. 2(e)) is larger than that of
AuNPs@MoS2@G@Ni foam (shown in the inset of Fig. 2(c)). The inset (1) and (2)
of Fig. 2(e) indicate the distribution of AuNPs is dense and even. The AuNPs
structures are presented in Fig. (d), presenting that the diameter of AuNPs is about 55
nm. This is caused by two reasons: (1) adjacent skeleton layers get close and even
stick together due to the nickel absence; (2) with the relax of the prestretched
elastomer substrates, the distance between the Au nanoparticles is further reduced to
gather more AuNPs. Energy spectrum analysis [37], a kind of technology that can
indicate the compositions of the specimens, are used to prove the existence of Au, Mo
and graphene.
Fig. 3. (a) Raman spectra of the CVD graphene, MoS2, and MoS2@G hybrid structure; (b) SERS
10-10 M. (d) Raman intensity of CV peaks at 910, 1176 and 1365 cm-1 as a function of the CV
molecular concentration with the high coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.972, 0.985 and 0.989,
respectively.
(a3) ε = 75%, (a4) ε = 100%; (b) SEM images of AuNPs@MoS2@GF: (b1) and (b2) show the
AuNPs@MoS2@GF without stretching under different magnification, (b3) and (b4) show the
molecules collected with the different stretching-relaxation cycles of the stretchable substrate with
the stretching of 100%; (d) The SERS spectra of 10-6M CV molecules collected with the different
results from the different deposition time; Raman intensity of CV peaks (d) at 910, 1176 and 1365
cm-1
Fig. 6. SERS spectra (a) of 10-6 M CV molecules collected on AuNPs@MoS2@GF with different
AuNPs results from the different deposition times; Raman intensity of CV peaks (b) at 910, 1176
and 1365 cm-1; SEM images of AuNPs@MoS2@GF with the deposition times of 3 (a) and 7 (b).
In order to further increase the electromagnetic coupling and then the SERS spectra
intensity, many times of the deposition (11 min one time) are carried out in our
experiment. While, only a little increase of the Raman intensity (shown in Fig. 6(a)
and 6(b)) is obtained for the 3 and 5 times deposition. The Raman intensity is even
decreased when the deposition times is 7. SEM images (3 times shown in Fig. 6c and
7 times shown in Fig. 6(d) are used to discuss the effects. Density of AuNPs increases
slightly by the oxidation-reduction reaction between MoS2 and HAuCl4. So the
Raman intensity is increased for the 3 and 5 growth times. While, after AuNPs grow
seven times, the distribution of AuNPs is so dense and some AuNPs are decorated on
other AuNPs, shown in Fig. 6(d), that the number of "hot spots" is decreased, which
affects the Raman intensity. In our experiment, SERS intensity of the
AuNPs@MoS2@GF grown for 5 times is strongest. However, considering the
complex processes and few increasing, one time is used in our experiment.
3. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (11474187, 11274204 and 61205174), and Shandong Provincial
Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2016AM19)
References
[1] C. Yang, C. Zhang, Y. Hugo, S. Jiang, H. Qiu, Y. Xu, X. Li, B. Man, Shell-isolated
graphene@Cu nanoparticles on graphene@Cu substrates for the application in SERS, Carbon
98 (2016) 526-533.
[2] A. V. Zaretski, S. E. Root, A. Savchenko, E. Molokanova, A. D. Printz, L. Jibril, G. Arya, M.
Mercola, D. J. Lipomi, Metallic Nanoislands on Graphene as Highly Sensitive Transducers of
Mechanical, Biological, and Optical Signals, Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 1375–1380.
[3] X. H. Li, X. Ren, Y. Zhang, W. C. Choy, B. Wei, An all-copper plasmonic sandwich system
obtained through directly depositing copper NPs on a CVD grown graphene/copper film and
its application in SERS, Nanoscale 7 (26) (2015) 11291.
[4] P. Ashish, Q. Anjum, Surface modified graphene oxide nanosheets by gold ion implantation
as a substrate for surface enhanced Raman scattering, J. Alloy. Compd. 703 (2017) 500-507.
[5] B. Kiraly, S. Yang, T.J. Huang, Multifunctional porous silicon nanopillar arrays:
antireflection, superhydrophobicity, photoluminescence, and surface-enhanced Raman
scattering, Nanotechnology 24 (24) (2013) 245704.
[6] C. Zhang, B.Y. Man, S.Z. Jiang, C. Yang, M. Liu, C.S. Chen, et al., SERS detection of
low-concentration adenosine by silver nanoparticles on silicon nanoporous pyramid arrays
structure, App. Surf. Sci. 347 (2015) 668-672.
[7] Z. Jun, Z. Zhaochun, Y. Shanshan, Z. Huoli, L. Yunbo, Facile synthesis of
MoS2 nanosheet-silver nanoparticles composite for surface enhanced Raman scattering and
electrochemical activity, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 559 (2013) 87-91.
[8] X. Ling, W. Fang, Y. H. Lee, P. T. Araujo, X. Zhang, J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, Y. Lin, J. Zhan
g, J. Kong, M. S. Dresselhaus, Raman Enhancement Effect on Two-Dimensional Layered
Materials: Graphene, h-BN and MoS2, Nano Lett. 14 (2014) 3033–3.
[9] X. Li, J. Li, X. Zhou, Y. Ma, Z. Zheng, X. Duan, et al., Silver nanoparticles pro-tected by
monolayer graphene as a stabilized substrate for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy,
Carbon 66 (2014) 713-719.
[10] M. Hiany, M. M. Oliveirab, A. J. G. Zarbinb, Thin and transparent films of graphene/silver
nanoparticles obtained at liquid–liquid interfaces: Preparation, characterization and
application as SERS substrates. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 438 (2015) 29-38.
[11] W. Xu, X. Ling, J. Xiao, M.S. Dresselhaus, J. Kong, H. Xu, Z. Liu, J. Zhang, Surface
enhanced Raman spectroscopy on a flat graphene surface, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109
(24) (2012) 9281–9286.
[12] Y. Wang, L. Polavarapu, L. M. Liz-Marzán, Reduced, Graphene Oxide-Supported Gold
Nanostars for Improved SERS Sensing and Drug Delivery, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 6
(2014) 21798−21805.
[13] C. Song, Y. Wei, B. Da, H. Zhang, X. Cong, B.Yang, Y. Yang , L. Wang, In situ growth of
monolayer porous gold nanoparticles film as high-performance SERS substrates, Mater. Res.
Express 3 (2016) 075013.
[14] H. Kai-Chih, C. Dong-Hwang, Highly Sensitive, Uniform, and Reusable Surface-Enhanced
Raman Scattering Substrate with TiO2 Interlayer between Ag Nanoparticles and Reduced
Graphene Oxide, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 7 (2015) 27571−27579.
[15] Q. Ding, L. Zhang, L. Yang, A simple approach for the synthesis of Ag-coated Ni@TiO2
nanocomposites as recyclable photocatalysts and SERS substrate to monitor catalytic
degradation of dye molecules, Materials Research Bulletin 53 (2014) 205–210.
[16] B. Luo and L. Zhi, Design and construction of three dimensional graphene-based composites
for lithium ion battery applications, Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (2015) 456-477.
[17] L. Juyoung, W. M. Cai, K. Pilgyu, S. W. Nam, Mechanically Self-Assembled,
Three-Dimensional Graphene−Gold Hybrid Nanostructures for Advanced Nanoplasmonic
Sensors, Nano Lett. (2015) 7684−7690.
[18] A. M. Gilbertson, Y. Francescato, T. Roschuk, V. Shautsova, C. Yiguo, et al.,
Plasmon-Induced Optical Anisotropy in Hybrid Graphene–Metal Nanoparticle Systems,
Nano Lett. 15 (2015) 3458–3464.
[19] D. B. Farmer, D. Rodrigo, T. Low, P. Avouris, Plasmon–Plasmon Hybridization and
Bandwidth Enhancement in Nanostructured Graphene, Nano Lett. 15 (2015) 2582–2587.
[20] M. Asl, P. Bristowe, K. Koziol, T. Heine, Effect of compression on the electronic, optical and
transport properties of MoS2/graphene-based junctions, 2D Mater. 3 (2016) 025018.
[21] Z, Longyun, G. Wei, Z. Cuiling, , S. Xinha, X. Yuezhong, In situ regulation nanoarchitecture
of Au nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide colloid for sensitive and selective SERS
detection of lead ions, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 465 (2016) 279-285.
[22] M. Dabiri, M. Kasmaei, P. Salari, S. Kazemi, MovahedCopper nanoparticle decorated three
dimensional graphene with high catalytic activity for Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, RSC
Adv. 6 (2016) 57019–57023.
[23] W. M. Cai, C. SungGyu, H. R. Steven, A. Ashraf, K. Pilgyu, N. SungWoo,
Heterogeneous, Three-Dimensional Texturing of Graphene, Nano Lett. 15 (2015) 1829–1835.
[24] C. Srichan, M. Ekpanyapong, M. Horprathum, P. Eiamchai, N. Nuntawong, D. Phokharatkul,
P. Danvirutai, E. Bohez, A. Wisitsoraat, A. Tuantranont, Highly-Sensitive Surface-Enhanced
Raman Spectroscopy (SERS)-based Chemical Sensor using 3D Graphene Foam Decorated
with Silver Nanoparticles as SERS substrate, Sci Rep. 6 (2016) 23733.
[25] L. Xiua, Z. Xiao-Juan, Y. Ting-Ting, W. Guang-Sheng, Y. Peng-Gang, G. Lin, Controlled
assembly of one-dimensional MoO3@Au hybrid nanostructures as SERS substrates for
sensitive melamine detection, CrystEngComm. 18 (2016) 7805-7813.
[26] S. Tang, Y. Li, H. Huang, P. Li, Z. Guo, Q. Luo, Z. Wang, P. K. Chu, J. Li, X.Yu, Efficient
Enrichment and Self-Assembly of Hybrid Nanoparticles into Removable and Magnetic SERS
Substrates for Sensitive Detection of Environmental Pollutants, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 9
(2017) 7472–7480.
[27] L. Zhang, Self-assembly Ag nanoparticle monolayer film as SERS Substrate for pesticide
detection, Applied Surface Science 270 (2013) 292– 294.
[28] S. Shao, Z. Chi ,Y. W. Lihui, C. Jie, Z. Xiaolei, L. Xingfen, et al., Creating SERS Hot Spots
on MoS2 Nanosheets with in Situ Grown Gold Nanoparticles, CS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6 (2014)
18735−18741.
[29] P. Debora, H. Hugo, A. Jose, B. Adrian, Band Alignment and Minigaps in Monolayer MoS
2-Graphene van der Waals Heterostructures, Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 4054−4061.
[30] Z. Pei, J. Lan, L. Xin Li, L. Bo, X. Yongda, S. Xuesong Shi, Shape-Controllable Gold
Nanoparticle−MoS2 Hybrids Prepared by Tuning Edge-Active Sites and Surface Structures of
MoS2 via Temporally Shaped Femtosecond Pulses, CS Appl. Mater. Inter. 9 (2017)
7447−7455.
[31] Y. Deng, M. Chen, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, W. Huang, Y. Zhao, J. P. Nshimiyimana, X. Hu, X. Chi,
G. Hou, X. Zhang, Y. Guo, L. Sun, Thickness-dependent morphologies of Ag on n-layer
MoS2 and its surface-enhanced Raman scattering, Nano Res. 9 (2016) 1682-1688.
[32] C. Muehlethaler, C. R. Considine, V. Menon, W.C. Lin, Y. H. Lee, J. R. Lombardi, Ultrahigh
Raman Enhancement on Monolayer MoS2, ACS Photonics 3 (2016) 1164−1169.
[33] K. Yang, Y. Hu, N. Dong, A novel biosensor based on competitive SERS immunoassay and
magnetic separation for accurate and sensitive detection of chloramphenicol, Biosensors and
Bioelectronics 80 (2016) 373–377.
[34] S. Pang, T. Yang, L. He, Review of surface enhanced Raman spectroscopic (SERS) detection
of synthetic chemical pesticides, Trac-Trend. Anal. Chem. 85 (2016) 73–82.
[35] C. Y. Song, Y. J. Yang, B. Y. Yang, Y. Z. Sun, Y. P. Zhao, L. H, Wang, An ultrasensitive SERS
sensor for simultaneous detection of multiple cancer-related miRNAs, Nanoscale 8 (2016)
17365.
[36] C. Song, L. Min, N. Zhou, Y. Yang, B. Yang, L Zhang, S Su, Lianhui WangUltrasensitive
detection of carcino-embryonic antigen by using novel flower-like gold nanoparticle SERS
tags and SERS-active magnetic nanoparticles, RSC Adv 4 (2014) 41666–41669.
[37] F. P. Schmidt, F. Hofer, J. R. Krenna, Spectrum image analysis tool – A flexible MATLAB
solution to analyze EEL and CL spectrum images, Micron 93 (2017) 43–51.
[38] S. Ma, R. Livingstone, B. Zhao, J. R. Lombardi, Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of
Nanostructured Semiconductor Phonon Modes, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 (2011) 671−674.
[39] B. R. Carvalho, Y. Wang, S. Mignuzzi, D. Roy, M. Terrones, C. Fantini, V. H. Crespi, L. M.
Malard, M. A. Pimenta, Intervalley scattering by acoustic phonons in two-dimensional
MoS2 revealed by double-resonance Raman spectroscopy, Nat. Commun. 8 14670 (2017).
[40] A. C. Ferrari, J. C. Meyer, V. Scardaci, C. Casiraghi, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, et al, Raman
spectrum of graphene and graphene layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 18(2006) 187401.
[41] P. Ranjan, Tulika, R. Laha, J. Balakrishnan, Au concentration-dependent quenching of
Raman 2D peak in graphene, J. Raman Spectrosc. 48 (2017) 586–591.
[42] A. B. Zrimsek, N. L. Wong, R. P. V. Duyne, Single Molecule Surface-Enhanced Raman
Spectroscopy: A Critical Analysis of the Bianalyte versus Isotopologue Proof, J. Phys. Chem.
C 120 (2016) 5133−5142.
[43] J. Lin, Y. Shang, X. Li, J. Yu, X. Wang, L. Guo, Au concentration-dependent quenching of
Raman 2D peak in graphene, Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1604797.
[44] P. Wang, O. Liang, W. Zhang, T. Schroeder, Y.H. Xie, Ultra-sensitive graphene-plasmonic
hybrid platform for label-free detection, Adv. Mater. 25 (2013) 4918e4924
[45] A.C. Ferrari, J.C. Meyer, V. Scardaci, C. Casiraghi, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, S. Piscanec, D.
Jiang, K. S. Novoselov, S. Roth, and A. K. Geim, Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene
layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 187401.
[46] M. Moskovits, Surface-enhanced spectroscopy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57 (1985) 783.
[47] K. Kneipp, H. Kneipp, I. Itzkan, R.R. Dasari, M.S. Feld, Ultrasensitive chemical analysis by
Raman spectroscopy, Chem. Rev. 99 (1999) 2957e2976.
[48] C. Y. Song, N. Zhou, B. Y. Yang, Y. J. Yang and L. H, WangFacile synthesis of hydrangea
flower-like hierarchical gold nanostructures with tunable surface topographies for
single-particle surface- enhanced Raman scattering, Nanoscale 7 (2015) 17004.
[49] H. Liu, A. M. Schwenke, F. Kretschmer, S. Hoeppener, U. S. Schubert, Gold Nanoparticle
Cluster Arrays for High-Performance SERS Substrates Fabricated by Electro-oxidative
Lithography, Chem. Nano. Mat. 2 (2016) 781–785
[50] J. M. Romo-Herrera, A. L. González, L. Guerrini, F. R. Castiello, G. Alonso-Nuñez, a O.
E. Contreras c, R. A. Alvarez-Puebla, A study of the depth and size of concave cube Au
nanoparticles as highly sensitive SERS probes, Nanoscale 7 (2016) 7326–7333
[51] K. Liu, Y. Bai, L. Zhang, Z. Yang, Q. Fan, et al, Porous Au−Ag Nanospheres with
High-Density and Highly Accessible Hotspots for SERS Analysis, Nano Lett. 16 (2016)
3675−3681.
[52] S. Lia, D. Li, Q. Y. Zhang, X. Tang, Surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate with
high-density hotspots fabricated by depositing Ag film on TiO2-catalyzed Ag nanoparticles,
J. Alloy. Compd. 689 (2016) 439-445.
[53] D. Xu, L. Liu, F. Teng, F. Wu, N. Lu, Trapping analyte molecules in hotspots with modified
free-standing silver bowtie nanostructures for SERS detection, RSC Adv. 6 (2016)
84480–84484.
[54] K. T. Tu, C. K. Chung, Enhancement of Surface Raman Spectroscopy Performance by Silver
Nanoparticles on Resin Nanorods Arrays from Anodic Aluminum Oxide Template, J.
Electrochem. Soc. 164 (2017) 3081-B3086.