Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 8. Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
2. Physical and Chemical Properties . . . . . . . . . 49 8.1. Esters of Cyclohexanol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
3. Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 8.2. Cyclohexanone Oxime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.1. Hydrogenation of Phenol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 8.3. Methylcyclohexanols and
3.2. Liquid-Phase Oxidation of Cyclohexane . . . . 51 Methylcyclohexanones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.3. Boric Acid Modified Oxidation of Cyclohexane 51 8.4. Trimethylcyclohexanols and
3.4. Production and Hydration of Cyclohexene . . 52 Trimethylcyclohexanones. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 56
3.5. Dehydrogenation of Cyclohexanol . . . . . . . . . 54 9. Economic Aspects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 57
4. Plant Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 10. Toxicology and Occupational Health . . . . . .. 58
5. Quality Specifications and Chemical Analysis 54 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 58
6. Storage and Transportation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
7. Uses and Trade Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Table 1. Physical properties of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone cyclohexene, an intermediate obtained from the
Property Cyclo- Cyclo-
partial hydrogenation of benzene.
hexanol hexanone Cyclohexanone can be prepared by dehydro-
genation of cyclohexanol; the reverse reaction,
mp, C 25.15 47
bp, C 161.1 156.4
hydrogenation of cyclohexanone to cyclohexa-
Vapor pressure, kPa 0.15 (20 C) 0.52 (20 C) nol, is also practical although not commercially
0.48 (35 C) practiced. Most large-scale cyclohexanol/cyclo-
d420 0.9493 0.9455 hexanone facilities employ some form of cyclo-
n20
D 1.4656 1.4552
Expansion coefficient 8.25 104 9.14 104
hexane oxidation technology. The only remain-
Dynamic viscosity, mPa s 41.07 (30 C) 1.803 (30 C) ing large phenol-based plants belong to DSM in
17.20 (45 C) Holland and Allied in the United States. Asahi
Specific heat, J/g 1.747 1.811 has the only commercial cyclohexene-based
Surface tension, mN/m 33.47 (30 C) 33.51 (30 C)
Heat of fusion, kJ/mol 1.791 1.501
plant, and there are reports of planned expansions
Heat of combustion, at that facility in Japan as well as building a new
MJ/mol 3.722 3.521 plant in China.
Heat of vaporization,
kJ/mol 45.51 44.92
Heat of formation, kJ/mol 352 272
Flash point, C 68 54 3.1. Hydrogenation of Phenol
Autoignition temp., C 300 420
Solubility at 20 C, The product of phenol hydrogenation, i.e., cy-
g of compound/100 g
of water 3.6 9.0
clohexanol, cyclohexanone, or a mixture of the
g of water/100 g two, is determined by the metal catalyst. Cyclo-
of compound 12.6 5.7 hexanol can be prepared in high yield by either
Azeotropes vapor- or liquid-phase hydrogenation of phenol.
With water: bp, C 97.8 96.6
composition,
Vapor-phase hydrogenation can be carried out by
water : compound 80 : 20 56 : 44 using a supported nickel catalyst or a nickel
With phenol: bp, C 183 catalyst containing copper, cobalt, or manganese.
composition, The support is usually alumina or silicic acid.
phenol : compound 87 : 13
Yields as high as 98 % have been reported [2–5].
A flow diagram of the vapor-phase hydrogena-
tion is shown in Figure 1.
(an intermediate on the way to caprolactam) and
its oxidation with nitric acid to give adipic acid.
3. Production
Cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone were first pro-
duced on an industrial scale by the hydrogenation
of phenol. This was followed in the 1940s by
transition metal-catalyzed liquid-phase air oxi-
dation of cyclohexane, which gave a mixture of
cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone, the ratio of
which could be partially controlled by the choice
of metal catalyst. In the 1950s, Scientific Design
developed a boric acid modified liquid-phase air
oxidation of cyclohexane. This process, in which
the intermediate cyclohexyl hydroperoxide was
trapped as the peroxoborate ester, led to a higher
Figure 1. Vapor-phase phenol hydrogenation process
yield and a higher ratio of cyclohexanol to cy- a) Phenol evaporator; b) Hydrogenation reactor; c) Conden-
clohexanone. Around 1990, Asahi commercial- ser; d) Low-boiler removal column; e) Cyclohexanol/cyclo-
ized the production of cyclohexanol from hexanone recovery column
Vol. 11 Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone 51
anhydrous metaboric acid [13460-50-9]was BðOOC6 H11 Þ3 þ3 C6 H12 ! BðOC6 H11 Þ3 þ3 C6 H11 OH ð4Þ
added as a slurry to the first of several staged
air oxidation vessels (see Figure 3) [48, 49]. The BðOC6 H11 Þ3 þ3 H2 O ! 3 C6 H11 OHþH3 BO3 ð5Þ
cyclohexyl hydroperoxide formed is trapped as
the cyclohexyl perborate ester (Eq. 3). The per- 3 H3 BO3 ! H3 B3 O6 þ3 H2 O ð6Þ
borate ester then reacts with additional cyclohex-
ane in the air oxidizer to yield the borate ester and
additional cyclohexanol (Eq. 4). This borate es- The chemistry of this process is very similar to
ter is relatively stable in the air oxidizer and is the metal-catalyzed oxidation except that the
protected from over oxidation to ring-opened cyclohexyl rings are protected from further at-
products. The ester is subsequently hydrolyzed tack. Compared to other commercial processes,
to cyclohexanol and boric acid [10043-35-3] the boric acid process is characterized not only by
(Eq. 5). The boric acid is dehydrated to meta- a higher investment and a higher operating cost
boric acid and is recycled to the air oxidizer (to recover and recycle the boric acid), but also by
(Eq. 6). a higher yield of cyclohexanol and cyclohexa-
none (up to 88 %) and an alcohol to ketone ratio
18 C6 H12 þ9 O2 þ2 H3 B3 O6 ! 6 BðOOC6 H11 Þ3 þ12 H2 O as high as 10 : 1. The technology was further
ð3Þ developed by Institut Français du Petrole [50,
51]. The Halcon process has been licensed to
Table 2. Ratio of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone produced from several companies around the world. The major
cyclohexyl hydroperoxide producers using this technology today are Solu-
Solution*– Catalyst Tempera- Ratio** tia, DuPont (UK), Bayer, and Mitsubishi. The
Modification ture, C original plant at Rhône-Poulenc, based on this
A none 155 0.8
technology, was now shut down.
A Cr 155 0.4
A Ni 155 1.4
A V 155 1.4
A Co 155 3.0
3.4. Production and Hydration of
A Mn 155 3.3 Cyclohexene
B Co 160 2.5
A – hydrogenation of 1 Pd 150 5 – 10 In 1972 the first patent covering the selective
A – separate caustic
aqueous phase Co 120 0.2 hydrogenation of benzene [71-43-2] to cyclohex-
ene [110-83-8] appeared [52]. Shortly there-
*
A ¼ cyclohexyl hydroperoxide (1) in cyclohexane; B ¼ 1 in air
oxidizer tails. after, two patents described the hydration of
**
Cyclohexanol : cyclohexanone. cyclohexene to cyclohexanol by using various
Vol. 11 Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone 53
catalysts [53, 54]. Since then, a large number of which point the product consists of about 35 %
patents have appeared worldwide. In 1990, Asahi cyclohexene, 15 % cyclohexane, and 50 % un-
commercialized this process with a 100 t/a plant converted benzene. The selectivity is very sensi-
in Japan. The process involves three primary tive to impurities such as sulfur and iron. For this
steps: the selective hydrogenation of benzene; reason the benzene must be specially purified and
the separation of the cyclohexene from the un- the hydrogenation vessel lined with an inert
converted benzene and the over-hydrogenation material [55–58].
product cyclohexane; and the hydration of the The mixture of cyclohexane, cyclohexene,
cyclohexene (Fig. 4). and benzene can not be distilled but must go
The hydrogenation is carried out with a spe- through two successive extractive distillations.
cially prepared heterogeneous nickel catalyst. The best solvent to use in these distillations has
The reaction is run to about 50 % conversion, at been the subject of numerous patents [59–62].
The recovered cyclohexane could be converted formed in the oxidation, usually called ‘‘coffee
back to benzene, but is probably sold to other grounds,’’ can be pyrophoric. At least one inci-
caprolactam and adipic acid manufacturers. dent occurred in which the air sparger, entering
The hydration of cyclohexene is also per- the oxidizer, was observed to be ‘‘glowing red,’’
formed with a heterogeneous catalyst in a slurry indicating a fire inside the sparger. An incident of
reactor. The extent of hydration is limited by the a fire inside an oxidizer at the sparger nozzles has
equilibrium constant, which would restrict been reported by ICI.
conversion to about 14 %. The use of several A sudden release of the hot cyclohexane to
additives to increase the conversion of cyclo- the atmosphere, (e.g., from the rupture of a
hexene to cyclohexanol has also been patented process line or a break in the air oxidation vessel
[63–68]. itself) results in an extremely hazardous situa-
The yield of this process from benzene to tion. An incident of this type occurred at a
cyclohexanol is extremely high, probably Monsanto plant at Pensacola, Florida in 1971.
greater than 95 %. Although byproducts are Fortunately, the resulting vapor cloud was dis-
not a concern, the investment is significantly persed by the prevailing winds before it could
higher than that of a conventional cyclohexane ignite.
oxidation plant. The fact that the product is In 1974, a much more serious incident oc-
cyclohexanol, not cyclohexanone, could make curred at a Nipro plant in Flixborough, England.
it unattractive as the basis for a caprolactam A section of 50-cm pipe connecting two air
plant. oxidation vessels ruptured, resulting in the re-
lease of a large cloud of cyclohexane vapor.
About 30 s after the break occurred, the
3.5. Dehydrogenation of Cyclohexanol vapor cloud ignited, and the resulting explosion
destroyed the plant. A total of 28 lives were
Cyclohexanol can be dehydrogenated to cyclo- lost.
hexanone (the desired starting material for cap-
rolactam manufacture) without catalyst by pass-
ing the vapors through a tube furnace at 400 – 5. Quality Specifications and
450 C. The vapors are cooled, the hydrogen Chemical Analysis
separated, and the cyclohexanone, which con-
tains cyclohexene and water, is purified in a High-grade commercial cyclohexanol, usually
distillation column. The purity of the resulting obtained from hydrogenation of phenol, has the
cyclohexanone is 98 – 99 % [69–72]. following specifications:
The catalytic dehydrogenation, which is gen-
erally practiced, can be carried out under milder
conditions and in better yield over a variety of
catalysts, including chromium oxide – copper mp 19 – 23 C
bp 159 – 162 C
[73], opper chromate [74], nickel [75, 76], zinc Water content 0.1 %
sulfide, and zinc – iron catalyst [77–79], cobalt Phenol content 0.0001 %
carbonate [80], and other metals [81].
Methylcyclohexanols
DL-cis-2-Methylcyclohexanol [7443-70-1] 7 165.2 0.934
DL-trans-2-Methylcyclohexanol [7443-52-9] 4 166.5 0.924
D-cis-3-Methylcyclohexanol [5454-79-5] 4.7 174.0 0.917
L-trans-3-Methylcyclohexanol [7443-55-2] 1 175.0 0.915
cis-4-Methylcyclohexanol [7731-28-4] 9.2 174.0 0.912
trans-4-Methylcyclohexanol [7731-29-5] 173.0 0.916
Commercial mixture [25639-42-3] 50 173 – 175 0.913 154
Methylcyclohexanones
DL-2-Methylcyclohexanone [583-60-8] 13.9 165.1 0.925 1.4440 48
(25 C)
DL-3-Methylcyclohexanone [591-24-2] 73.5 170.0 0.920 1.4449 48
(20 C)
4-Methylcyclohexanone [589-92-4] 40.6 171.3 0.916 1.4451 48
(20 C)
Commercial mixture [1331-22-2] 165 – 171 0.918 – 0.925
Vol. 11 Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone 57
The physical properties of the two isomers clohexanol are as replacement for cyclohexanol
are: cis isomer [933-48-2], mp 37.3 C, n60 in polishes and waxes. Because of its lower vapor
1.4390, d600.860, vapor pressure 1.3 kPa (at pressure and unique structure, trimethylcyclo-
86 C), flash point 88 C, solubility in water hexanol is better than cyclohexanol in varnishes
0.19 % (at 60 C), water solubility in alcohol and shellacs.
4.0 % (at 60 C); trans isomer [767-54-4], mp The trimethylcyclohexanol that is sold com-
57.3 C, n60 1.4390, d600.862, vapor pressure mercially is a mixture of the cis and trans iso-
1.3 kPa (at 76 C), flash point 76 C, solubility mers. Analysis of a typical commercial product
in water 0.17 % (at 60 C), water solubility in indicates 98 % trimethylcyclohexanols, 1 % tri-
alcohol 2.6 % (at 60 C). methylcyclohexanone, 0.4 % trimethylcyclohex-
Trimethylcyclohexanol (2) is miscible in all ane, 0.3 % trimethylcyclohexene, 0.1 % isophor-
proportions with most organic solvents. It is a one, and 0.2 % water.
cyclic alcohol with similar properties to cyclo- Trimethylcyclohexanol can be stored and
hexanol. Oxidation of trimethylcyclohexanol transported in iron or steel drums, containers,
with nitric acid gives a mixture of 2,2,4-trimethy- tank cars, or tank trucks. It is stable indefinitely
ladipic acid and 2,4,4-trimethyladipic acid. and does not need to be blanketed with an inert
Trimethylcyclohexanol is prepared by hydroge- gas.
nating 3,5,5-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one [78-
59-1] (1), isophorone (a condensation product of 3,3,5-Trimethylcyclohexanone (3) [873-
acetone). 94-9], C6H16O, Mr 140.24, is a colorless liquid
having properties similar to those of cyclohexa-
none. It has the following physical properties: mp
–10 C, bp 188.8 C, d20 0.888, n201.4455, flash
point 72 C, solubility (at 20 C) of ketone in
water 0.3 %, water in ketone 1.4 %. It is miscible
in all proportions with most organic solvents.
Trimethylcyclohexanone (3) is also prepared
by hydrogenating trimethylcyclohexenone (2).
However, the olefin hydrogenation can be carried
out without hydrogenating the ketone by using a
palladium-supported catalyst at 110 – 170 C
and 0.2 – 6 MPa [98]. The combination of cata-
lyst, reaction conditions, and amount of hydro-
gen determines whether the ketone or alcohol is
produced.
Trimethylcyclohexanone is a good solvent for
low molecular mass poly(vinyl chloride)-type
alkyd resins and for nitrocellulose. It can be used
The best catalyst for the hydrogenation is in place of methylcyclohexanone, where its high-
nickel or a mixture of nickel and copper on either er boiling point results in superior performance in
silica gel or alumina. The hydrogenation is car- some applications.
ried out in high yield at 120 – 200 C and 1 –
2 MPa. The byproducts of the reaction are small
amounts of trimethylcyclohexanone, trimethyl- 9. Economic Aspects
cyclohexane, and trimethylcyclohexene.
The most important use for the alcohol is as a Cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone are primarily
feedstock for trimethyladipic acid [93–97]. This captively consumed-either isolated or as a mix-
mixture of 2,2,4-trimethyladipic acid [3586-39- ture-in the production of adipic acid and capro-
8] and 2,4,4-trimethyladipic acid [3937-59-5], is lactam less than 5% is used in other markets [99].
used in the manufacture of plasticizers and Important producers are Invista (USA), Honey-
lubricants, and can be converted to dinitriles, coell (USA), Solutia (USA), BASF (Germany),
diamines, or glycols. Other uses for trimethylcy- and DSM (Netherlands).
58 Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone Vol. 11
10. Toxicology and Occupational value is the same as the TLV/TWA value [91].
Health Excessive exposure causes headaches and eye
and nose irritation.
Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone are Methylcyclohexanones are moderately toxic
moderately toxic [100], but have no apparent to laboratory animals and cause eye, nose, and
carcinogenicity. For cyclohexanol the OSHA throat irritation; they have produced corneal
TLV for exposure to vapor for 8 h is 50 ppm damage to the eyes of rabbits. The single-dose
[101]. The ACGIH has established TLV-TWA oral LD50 for rats is ca. 2 g/kg [92]. 2-Methyl-
values for exposure to cyclohexanol vapor of cyclohexanone may be absorbed through the
50 ppm, 200 mg/m3 [102]. The TLV-TWA for skin. Its TLV/TWA and MAK are 50 ppm,
cyclohexanone is 25 ppm, 100 mg/m3. The 230 mg/m3; the TLV/STEL is 75 ppm,
MAKs for both compounds are 50 ppm, 345 mg/m3..
200 mg/m3. Trimethylcyclohexanol has the same toxico-
Excessive exposure to vapor of either chemi- logical properties as methylcyclohexanol, but
cal results in irritation to the eyes, nose, and because of its lower vapor pressure, it presents
throat. Exposure of animals to a high concentra- fewer hazards. Neither TLV nor MAK values
tion of cyclohexanol vapor resulted in irritation, have been adopted.
lacrimation, salivation, lethargy, incoordination, The toxicity of trimethylcyclohexanone is
narcosis, mild convulsions, and, in some cases, similar to that of methylcyclohexanone, but its
death. Degenerative changes were noted in the lower vapor pressure makes it less dangerous to
brain, kidney, and liver of rabbits exposed re- handle.
peatedly to high vapor concentrations of cyclo-
hexanol [100].
Exposure of animals to high concentrations of References
cyclohexanone vapor also resulted in irritation,
lacrimation, and salivation. Decreased heart rate 1 G. Schwarzenbach, E. Felder, Helv. Chim. Acta 27
and depression of the CNS were also noted [103]. (1944) 1044. G. Schwarzenbach, C. Witwer, Helv.
Degenerative changes were noted in the kidney Chim. Acta 30 (1947) 659, 669.
and liver of monkeys and rabbits exposed repea- 2 BASF, DE 352 439, 1913.
3 Tetralin Ges., DE 299 012, 1916.
tedly to high vapor concentrations of cyclo-
4 Chem. Tech. (Leipzig) 18 (1966) no. 10, 608 – 613.
hexanone. 5 Stamicarbon, US 3 305 586, 1967 (P. Bernard).
For single dosages of cyclohexanol, the oral 6 Stamicarbon, GB 890 095, 1960.
LD50 for rats is 2.06 g/kg [104] and the minimum 7 G. D. Lyubarskii, G. K. Kervalishvili, Khim. Promst.
lethal dose for rabbits is 2.4 g/kg [92]. With (Moscow) 7 (1972) 491.
cyclohexanone, the oral LD50 for rats is 8 Allied Chemical Corp., US 4 092 360, 1978 (J. F. van
1.62 g/kg [105] and the minimum lethal dose Peppen, W. B. Fisher).
for rabbits is 1.6 – 1.9 g/kg [92]. 9 Allied Chemical Corporation, US 5 015 787, 1991 (J. F.
van Peppen).
Cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone are moder-
10 Du Pont, US 3 530 185, 1970 (K. Pugi).
ately irritating to the eye and can cause corneal 11 Du Pont, US 3 957 876, 1976 (M. Rapoport, J. O.
injury [105, 106]. Cyclohexanol can be absorbed White).
through the skin in toxic amounts, and extensive 12 Union Carbide, US 3 404 185, 1968 (T. Adams).
exposure can cause tremors, narcosis, hypother- 13 Celanese, US 3 598 869, 1971 (P. J. Volpe, W. J.
mia, and death [92]. Cyclohexanone is only Humphrey).
moderately irritating to the skin. Defatting and 14 Du Pont, US 3 987 100, 1976 (W. J. Barnett, D. L.
dermatitis of the skin occurred when animals Schmitt, J. O. White).
15 Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 510 526, 1970 (J. P. M. Bonnart,
were exposed for long periods of time [107].
Y. Bonnet, P. P. M. Rey).
16 Arco, US 3 949 004, 1976 (H. A. Sorgenti, S. N.
Derivatives. Commercial methylcyclohexa- Rudnick).
nol is low in toxicity, and the ACGIH has set 17 Rhône-Poulenc, BE 731 125, 1969.
TLVs of 75 ppm, 350 mg/m3(STEL) and 18 Arco, GB 1 335 296, 1973 (H. A. Sorgenti, S. N.
50 ppm, 235 mg/m3 (8-h TWA). The MAK Rudnick).
Vol. 11 Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone 59
19 Du Pont, US 4 675 450, 1987 (J. B. Lyon, G. T. Stowe). 53 BASF, DE 2 124 590, 1972 (R. Platz, W. Fuchs, C.
20 Monsanto, US 3 260 742, 1966. Dudeck).
21 Du Pont, US 2 851 496, 1958 (H. L. Cates, R. W. 54 Ube Industries, JP 7 809 746, 1978 (T. Kawahito, M.
Wheatcroft, A. B. Stiles, J. O. Punderson). Tamure).
22 Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 925 316, 1975 (J-C. Brunie, N. 55 Asahi, JP 60 255 738, 1985 (H. Nagahara, Y. Fukuoka).
Crenne, F. Maurel). 56 Asahi, JP 90 016 736B, 1990.
23 Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 923 895, 1975 (M. Constantini, 57 Bayer, DE 4 414 328, 1995 (H. Fiege, H. Haerle, A.
N. Crenne, M. Jouffret, J. Nouvel). Klausener).
24 Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 928 452, 1975 (J-C. Nouvel, M. 58 Sumitomo, US 4 665 274, 1987.
Costantini, N. Crenne, M. Jouffret). 59 Asahi, JP 61 221 134, 1985 (Y. Fukuoka, O. Mitsui).
25 Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 927 105, 1975 (J-C. Brunie, N. 60 DSM, US 4 927 974, 1989 (van den Brink, van Geem).
Crenne). 61 Sumitomo, JP 62 126 139, 1987.
26 Stamicarbon (DSM), US 3 941 845, 1976 (W. Vvos- 62 Sumitomo, JP 62 123 136, 1987.
kuil, J. J. M. van der Donck). 63 Asahi, EP 162 475, 1985 (M. Tojo, O. Mitsui).
27 Stamicarbon (DSM), US 3 987 101, 1976 (J. Wolters, J. 64 Asahi, JP 63 154 636, 1988 (O. Mitsui, H. Goto).
L. J. P. Hennekens). 65 Du Pont, US 5 321 155, 1994 (W. C. Drinkard, G. C.
28 Stamicarbon (DSM), US 4 042 630, 1977 (J. Wolters, J. Grunewald).
L. J. P. Hennekens). 66 Sumitomo, US 4 691 064, 1987.
29 Du Pont, GB 777 087, 1957. 67 Sumitomo, US 4 716 253, 1987 (T. Shirafuji, K. Sakai,
30 Rhône-Poulenc, BE 715 662, 1968. K. Hirose).
31 Rhône-Poulenc, GB 1 229 734, 1971 (J-C. Brunie, N. 68 Sumitomo, US 4 670 612, 1986.
Crenne). 69 F. Andreas, Chem. Tech. (Leipzig) 18 (1966) no. 10, 608.
32 Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 923 895, 1975 (M. Constantini, 70 J. W. Bruce, Ind. Chem. 1963, no. 3, 121.
N. Crenne, M. Jouffret, J. Nouvel). 71 Scientific Design, BE 598 094, 1960.
33 Du Pont, US 4 326 084, 1981 (J. D. Druliner, P. J. Krusic, 72 Monsanto, US 2 970 172, 1959 (D. R. Cova).
S. D. Ittel, C. Tolman). 73 Wingfoot Corp., US 2 218 457, 1937 (C. F. Winans).
34 Du Pont, US 4 503 257, 1985 (J. D. Druliner, J. 74 Du Pont, US 2 163 284, 1937 (W. A. Lazier).
Hermolin). 75 Monsanto, US 2 970 172, 1959 (D. R. Cova).
35 DSM, US 5 298 665, 1992 (H. A. C. Baur, Hoogendoorn, 76 L. K. Filippenko, K. N. Belonogov, V. P. Gostikin, Izv.
Janssen, Ragten). Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Khim. Tekhnol. 13 (1970) 3.
36 Phillips, US 2 931 834, 1960 (W. W. Crouch, J. C. 77 F. Laucht, US 2 338 445, 1939.
Hillyer). 78 I. G. Farben, DE 743 004, 1940 (F. Laucht, O. Klopfer).
37 BASF, GB 1 382 849, 1975 (O. A. Grosskinsky, G. 79 K. Smeykal, H.-J. Naumann, Chem. Tech. (Leipzig) 13
Herrmann, R. Kaiser, A. Kuessner). (1961) no. 3, 132.
38 Stamicarbon (DSM), US 4 238 415, 1980 (W. O. 80 Allied Signal Corporation, US 3 974 221, 1976 (J.
Bryan). Duggan).
39 Stamicarbon (DSM), EP 0 004 105, 1979 (W. O. 81 BASF, US 3 149 166, 1964 (G. Poehler, A. Wegerich,
Bryan). H. Giehne, O. Goerhre).
40 DSM, CA 1 244 475, 1983 (Housmans, Vannispen, 82 S. D. Nogare, J. Mitchell, Jr., Anal. Chem. 25 (1953)
Plantema). 1376.
41 DSM, EP 659 776, 1995 (H. A. C. Baur, U. F. Kragten). 83 N. A. Cheronics, T. S. Ma: Organic Functional Group
42 Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 557 215, 1971 (J. P. M. Bonnart, Analysis by Micro and Semimicro Methods, Inter-
Y. Bonnet, P. P. M. Rey). science, New York 1964, pp. 493 – 496.
43 Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 694 511, 1972 (J. Nouvel). 84 J. Mitchell, Jr., D. M. Smith, W. M. D. Bryant, J. Am.
44 Stamicarbon (DSM), US 3 927 108, 1975 (C. G. M. van Chem. Soc. 63 (1941) 573.
der Moesdijk, A. M. J. Thomas). 85 W. M. D. Bryant, D. M. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 57
45 Stamicarbon (DSM), US 3 937 735, 1976 (P. L. M. (1935) 57.
Dois). 86 United States Government, ‘‘Code of Federal Regula-
46 Rhône-Poulenc, GB 1 221 629, 1971 (J. Nouvel). tions’’, 49CFR172.101, Oct. 1, 1998.
47 DuPont, US 4 720 592, 1988 (U. N. Besmar, J. B. Lyon, 87 Kirk-Othmer, 4th ed., 49 (1993) 885.
F. J. Miller, M. T. Musser). 88 Toray, GB 1 402 480, 1975.
48 Halcon, US 3 317 614, 1967 (W. C. Long). 89 A. K. Doolittle: The Technology of Solvents and Plas-
49 Halcon, US 3 665 028, 1972 (J. L. Russell). ticizers, J. Wiley & Sons, New York 1954.
50 Institut Français du Petrole, FR 1 556 979, 1969 (J. 90 I. Mellon: Industrial Solvents, Reinhold Publ., New
Alagy, A. Zuech, B. Cha). York 1950, pp. 521 – 522.
51 Institut Français du Petrole, FR 1 573 834, 1969 (J. 91 DFG (ed.): Maximum Concentrations at the Workplace
Alagy, L. Asselineau, C. Busson, B. Cha). (MAK), VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany
52 Du Pont, BE 782 721, 1972 (W. C. Drinkard). 1986.
60 Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone Vol. 11