Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8, 2009
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 3. Surface current on the antenna at (a) 2.3, (b) 10, and (c) 15 GHz.
bottom and the ground. The CPW ground in the notch is de- Fig. 4. The reflection coefficient versus frequency with different tapering rate
signed as a T shape, which forms a width varying slotline with : w = 30 ,w = 23 ,w = 28 : ,l = 41 = 26 6 = 0 5
,l : ,h : ,g = 02 :
(units: mm).
the notch top. It can be seen that the slotline is open at the end
and is equivalent to a shunt capacitance.
Both of the antennas were printed on FR4 substrates and were CPW ground is used not only as a ground plane, but also as a
optimized with HFSS. To compare their characteristics, the sizes component to form the distributed matching network with the
of the substrates and the rectangular patches of the two antennas monopole.
were set to be the same. The CPWs were designed for a char-
acteristic impedance of 50 . A set of optimized parameter B. The M-Shaped Notch
values of the two antennas is shown in the captions of Fig. 2.
Fig. 2(a) shows the simulated input impedance curves. It can be The effect of the M-shaped notch on the antenna impedance
seen that the impedance curve of the new antenna is more flat characteristic was simulated with HFSS. Fig. 5(a) shows the re-
at the whole frequency band. The reflection coefficient curves flection coefficient curves with different values of . It is found
are plotted in Fig. 2(b). It is obtained from the simulation that that the impedance characteristic at the lower and higher fre-
the bandwidths of the two antennas are, respectively, 2.53–5.2 quency band is sensitive to the variation of . Fig. 5(b) gives the
and 2.4–24.3 GHz dB . That is to say, the frac- reflection coefficient curves with different notch width and
tional bandwidth increases from 69.1% to 164% due to the new length . It is indicated by the results that the lower cutoff fre-
design. Fig. 3 shows the surface current distributions of the two quency can be turned down by changing the values of and
antennas at 2.3, 10, and 15 GHz. It is shown that the surface . Based on the above analysis, the combination of ,
current distributions are modified in the novel design. It is also mm, and mm is optimal for a lower low cutoff
indicated by Fig. 3 that the T-shaped ground plays an important frequency.
role in antenna impedance matching, for the current density on
its surface is relatively higher. C. The T Configuration
The CPW ground in the notch plays an important role in
III. PARAMETRIC STUDIES AND SIMULATED RESULTS antenna impedance matching, and its configuration was em-
phasized in the improved design of the antenna. It was found
A. The Tapered Ground that the impedance characteristic at the whole frequency band
could be improved when this part of ground was designed to be
The tapered ground edges of the new antenna follow the ex- a T shape. Fig. 6(a) shows the reflection coefficient curves with
ponential regularity of . The effect of the tapering different values of . It is shown that the antenna impedance
rate on the antenna impedance characteristic was simulated characteristic ameliorates with the values of increasing.
when . Fig. 4 demonstrates the simulated reflection co- Fig. 6(b) shows the reflection coefficient curves with different
efficient curves with different values of . It is seen that wide- values of . It can be seen that with the values of reducing,
band multiresonant characteristics around 5, 10, and 16 GHz are the impedance characteristic between 7–16 GHz is improved,
obtained with the help of the tapered ground. Here, the tapered and the high cutoff frequency rises accordingly. It is concluded
1396 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 8, 2009
Fig. 7. Effects of the ground sizes on the radiation patterns at 10 GHz. (a) Ra-
diation patterns for different values of l : w= 30 mm. (b) Radiation patterns
for different values of w : l =6 mm.
V. CONCLUSION
It was pointed out by much research that the bandwidth of
the planar printed rectangular monopole was narrower than the
circular or elliptical ones. However, by the M-shaped notch at
the patch bottom and the proposed ground configurations in this
letter, its bandwidth can be widened to 164%. The bandwidth
of the proposed antenna is about 2.3 times of the conventional
Fig. 10. Measured antenna gain and radiation efficiency. one and is also wider than many other ones reported before.
The antenna exhibits a simple structure, small sizes, and good
wideband characteristic. It is a good candidate for the portable
mobile communication systems.
REFERENCES
[1] X. L. Liang, S. S. Zhong, and W. Wang, “UWB printed circular
monopole antenna,” Microw. Opt. Tech. Lett., vol. 48, no. 8, pp.
1532–1534, Aug. 2006.
[2] W. Tong and Z. R. Hu, “A CWP fed circular monopole antenna for ultra
wideband wireless communications,” in Proc. IEEE AP-S Int. Symp.,
2005, vol. 3A, pp. 528–531.
[3] N. W. Chen and Y. C. Liang, “Coplanar-waveguide fed circular disc
monopole antenna with improved radiation characteristics,” in 2nd
Proc. Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag., Edinburgh, U.K., 2007, pp. 1–6.
[4] J. Liang, L. Guo, C. C. Chiau, X. Chen, and C. G. Parini, “Study
of CPW-fed circular disc monopole antenna for ultra wideband ap-
plications,” in Proc. IEE Microw. Antennas Propag., Dec. 2005, pp.
520–526.
[5] C. M. Lee, T. C. Yo, C. H. Luo, C. H. Tu, and Y. Z. Juang, “Broadband
disk monopole antenna with a circular CPW-feeding line,” in Proc.
IEEE AP-S Int. Symp., Honoluu, HI, 2007, pp. 773–776.
[6] S. S. Zhong, X. L. Liang, and W. Wang, “Compact elliptical monopole
antenna with impedance bandwidth in excess of 21:1,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3082–3085, Nov. 2007.
[7] X. X. He and H. W. Deng, “Modified ultra wideband circular printed
monopole antenna,” Trans. Nan Jing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., vol.
25, no. 3, pp. 214–218, Sep. 2008.
[8] D. Abed, H. Kimouche, and B. Atrouz, “Small-size printed CPW-fed
antenna for ultra-wideband communications,” Electron. Lett., vol. 44,
no. 17, pp. 1003–1005, Aug. 2008.
[9] M. John and M. J. Ammann, “Optimization of impedance bandwidth
for the printed rectangular monopole antenna,” Microw. Opt. Technol.
Lett., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 153–154, Aug. 2005.
[10] M. Ojaroudi, C. Ghobadi, and J. Nourinia, “Small square monopole an-
tenna with inverted T-shaped notch in the ground plane for UWB ap-
plication,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 8, pp. 728–731,
Jul. 2009.
[11] M. H. Al Sharkawy, A. A. Eldek, A. Z. Elsherbeni, and C. E. Smith,
“Design of wideband printed monopole antenna using WIPL-D,” in
Proc. 20th Annu. Rev. Prog. Appl. Comput. Electromagn., Syracuse,
NY, Apr. 2004, pp. 166–169.
Fig. 11. Measured antenna radiation patterns: (a) 2.3, (b) 10, and (c) 15 GHz. [12] K. P. Ray and Y. Ranga, “Printed rectangular monopole antenna,” in
Proc. IEEE AP-S Int. Symp., 2006, pp. 1636–1639.
[13] K. P. Ray, Y. Ranga, and P. Gabhale, “Printed square monopole an-
antenna gain changes from 0.7 to 4.4 dBi across the frequency tenna with semicircular base for ultra-wide bandwidth,” Electron. Lett.,
band. Fig. 11 exhibits the measured azimuth and elevation pat- vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 13–14, Mar. 2007.