You are on page 1of 4

1394 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL.

8, 2009

CPW-Fed Planar Printed Monopole Antenna With


Impedance Bandwidth Enhanced
Chao Deng, Yong-jun Xie, and Ping Li

Abstract—A coplanar waveguide (CPW)-fed monopole antenna


is proposed, which is composed of a rectangular monopole patch
notched at the bottom, a T-shaped CPW ground in the notch,
and a tapered CPW ground out of the notch. The simulated and
experimental results show that the antenna achieves a fractional
impedance bandwidth of 164% for S11 10 dB, which is
about 2.3 times of the conventional one. The parametric studies
and measured radiation characteristics are presented. The results
show that the antenna exhibits good characteristics and is suitable
for portable mobile ultrawideband (UWB) applications.
Index Terms—Monopole antennas, planar antennas, rectan-
gular monopole, ultrawideband (UWB) antennas.

I. INTRODUCTION

M ONOPOLE antennas have been widely used in wireless


ultrawideband (UWB) communication systems because
of their simple structure, low costs, and omnidirectional radia-
Fig. 1. Antenna configurations: (a) the conventional; (b) the proposed.

tion pattern. The proposed designs of UWB monopole antennas


mainly include two types, which are respectively metal plate the bandwidth. The research on the planar rectangular and
monopole and planar printed monopole. The former needs a per- square monopole antennas was also carried out, but the results
pendicular ground plane, resulting in the increasing of antenna show these antennas yielded less bandwidth than the circular
volume and the inconvenience for integrating with monolithic or elliptical ones [9]–[12]. In [13], a microstrip-fed square
microwave integrated circuits, whereas the latter avoids the per- monopole with semicircular base was proposed, and the an-
pendicular ground plane. Therefore, planar printed monopole tenna impedance bandwidth ratio was increased to 11.31:1.
antenna is more compact in structure and possesses advantages However, compared to the microstrip line, CPW possesses
in the portable UWB applications. advantages of lower loss and is more convenient for shunt and
Recently, many planar printed monopole antennas have been series connections on the same side of the substrate avoiding
reported. The majority of these antennas have the regular shaped via holes. Therefore, CPW-fed monopole is preferred in the
configurations, such as circular, elliptical, modified circular, antenna design.
modified elliptical, etc. [1]–[5] presented some coplanar wave- In this letter, a novel CPW-fed rectangular monopole antenna
guide (CPW)-fed circular monopole antennas with impedance with a bandwidth of 164% is proposed and designed. The en-
bandwidth ratio of 4:1 to 10:1. In [6], a CPW-fed elliptical hancement of the bandwidth is achieved by an M-shaped notch
monopole antenna with the trapeziform ground was proposed, at the patch bottom, a tapered CPW ground out of the notch, and
achieving a bandwidth of more than 21:1. In [7] and [8], a T-shaped CPW ground in the notch. The design of the new an-
the circular and elliptical monopole antennas were modified, tenna and its simulated and experimental results are presented.
and the proposed antennas exhibited very large impedance The parametric studies are also given to make a full discussion
bandwidth with reasonably good radiation patterns throughout about its characteristics.

II. ANTENNA CONFIGRURATIONS


Manuscript received November 08, 2009; revised December 02, 2009 and De- The conventional CPW-fed rectangular monopole antenna is
cember 14, 2009. First published December 31, 2009; current version published
January 19, 2010. This work was supported by the Program for New Century shown in Fig. 1(a). The rectangular patch and the CPW are
Excellent Talents in University (NCET-04-0950). printed on the same side of the dielectric substrate. The an-
C. Deng and P. Li are with the National Laboratory of Antennas and tenna is fed by the central strip of the CPW at the patch bottom.
Microwave Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China, and also It is found from the simulation with HFSS that the fractional
with the Institute of Communication and Information Technology, Engineer
College of Chinese Armed Police Force, Xi’an 710086, China (e-mail: bandwidth of the antenna is about 70%. In order to broaden
dczq100w@yahoo.cn; nicehuahua@yahoo.cn). its bandwidth, the antenna is improved, and the new configura-
Y. Xie is with the National Laboratory of Antennas and Microwave Tech- tion is shown in Fig. 1(b). In the improved design, an M-shaped
nology, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China.
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this letter are available online notch is cut at the patch bottom to broaden the bandwidth as the
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. center-fed antenna. An exponentially tapered ground out of the
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/LAWP.2009.2039743 notch is adopted to minimize the capacitance between the patch
1536-1225/$26.00 © 2010 IEEE
DENG et al.: CPW-FED PLANAR PRINTED MONOPOLE ANTENNA WITH IMPEDANCE BANDWIDTH ENHANCED 1395

Fig. 3. Surface current on the antenna at (a) 2.3, (b) 10, and (c) 15 GHz.

Fig. 2. Comparisons of the characteristics of the two antennas (units: mm):


w = 30 = 23 = 2 8 = 2 = 41 = 26 6 = 6 0 = 1 0
,w ,w : ,p ,l ,l : ,l : ,l :,
= 0 5 = 0 2 = 0 45 = 2 5 = 1 9 = 6 3 = 12 9
h : ,g : ,d : ,d : ,d : ,b : ,a :,
= 18 1 = 00 25
: , : . (a) Input impedance curves. (b) Reflection coefficient
curves.

bottom and the ground. The CPW ground in the notch is de- Fig. 4. The reflection coefficient versus frequency with different tapering rate
signed as a T shape, which forms a width varying slotline with : w = 30 ,w = 23 ,w = 28 : ,l = 41 = 26 6 = 0 5
,l : ,h : ,g = 02 :
(units: mm).
the notch top. It can be seen that the slotline is open at the end
and is equivalent to a shunt capacitance.
Both of the antennas were printed on FR4 substrates and were CPW ground is used not only as a ground plane, but also as a
optimized with HFSS. To compare their characteristics, the sizes component to form the distributed matching network with the
of the substrates and the rectangular patches of the two antennas monopole.
were set to be the same. The CPWs were designed for a char-
acteristic impedance of 50 . A set of optimized parameter B. The M-Shaped Notch
values of the two antennas is shown in the captions of Fig. 2.
Fig. 2(a) shows the simulated input impedance curves. It can be The effect of the M-shaped notch on the antenna impedance
seen that the impedance curve of the new antenna is more flat characteristic was simulated with HFSS. Fig. 5(a) shows the re-
at the whole frequency band. The reflection coefficient curves flection coefficient curves with different values of . It is found
are plotted in Fig. 2(b). It is obtained from the simulation that that the impedance characteristic at the lower and higher fre-
the bandwidths of the two antennas are, respectively, 2.53–5.2 quency band is sensitive to the variation of . Fig. 5(b) gives the
and 2.4–24.3 GHz dB . That is to say, the frac- reflection coefficient curves with different notch width and
tional bandwidth increases from 69.1% to 164% due to the new length . It is indicated by the results that the lower cutoff fre-
design. Fig. 3 shows the surface current distributions of the two quency can be turned down by changing the values of and
antennas at 2.3, 10, and 15 GHz. It is shown that the surface . Based on the above analysis, the combination of ,
current distributions are modified in the novel design. It is also mm, and mm is optimal for a lower low cutoff
indicated by Fig. 3 that the T-shaped ground plays an important frequency.
role in antenna impedance matching, for the current density on
its surface is relatively higher. C. The T Configuration
The CPW ground in the notch plays an important role in
III. PARAMETRIC STUDIES AND SIMULATED RESULTS antenna impedance matching, and its configuration was em-
phasized in the improved design of the antenna. It was found
A. The Tapered Ground that the impedance characteristic at the whole frequency band
could be improved when this part of ground was designed to be
The tapered ground edges of the new antenna follow the ex- a T shape. Fig. 6(a) shows the reflection coefficient curves with
ponential regularity of . The effect of the tapering different values of . It is shown that the antenna impedance
rate on the antenna impedance characteristic was simulated characteristic ameliorates with the values of increasing.
when . Fig. 4 demonstrates the simulated reflection co- Fig. 6(b) shows the reflection coefficient curves with different
efficient curves with different values of . It is seen that wide- values of . It can be seen that with the values of reducing,
band multiresonant characteristics around 5, 10, and 16 GHz are the impedance characteristic between 7–16 GHz is improved,
obtained with the help of the tapered ground. Here, the tapered and the high cutoff frequency rises accordingly. It is concluded
1396 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 8, 2009

Fig. 5. Effects of the M-shaped notch on the reflection coefficient: d =0 ,


d = 1 9 = 0 5 = 2 8 = 0 2 = 26 6
: ,h : ,w : ,g : ,l : ,l = 41 ,l =6 ,
l = 1 0 = 23 = 30 = 00 25
: ,w ,w , : . (a) Reflection coefficient curves for
=9
different  : a . (b) Reflection coefficient curves for different a and b (unit:
mm):  = 18 1 : .

Fig. 7. Effects of the ground sizes on the radiation patterns at 10 GHz. (a) Ra-
diation patterns for different values of l : w= 30 mm. (b) Radiation patterns
for different values of w : l =6 mm.

Fig. 8. The antenna photograph.

of is more than 11 mm. Fig. 7(b) shows the radiation patterns


at 10 GHz with different values of . It can be seen that the
elevation patterns are slightly affected by the variation of .
It is also found from Fig. 7(a) and (b) that both of the values
a = 12 9
Fig. 6. Effects of the T configurations on the reflection coefficient: : ,
b = 6 3 d = 0 45 d = 1 9 h = 0 5 = 2 8 = 0 2 = 26 6
: , : , : , : ,w : ,g : ,l : ,
of and play an important role in controlling the azimuth
l = 41 = 6 = 23 = 30 = 18 1 = 00 25
,l ,w ,w , : , : . (a) Reflection patterns. Therefore, it is important to design proper ground
=10
coefficient curves for different d : l : . (b) Reflection coefficient curves according to different applications.
=25
for different l : d : .
IV. EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS
that the return loss is better than 10 dB between 2.4–24.3 GHz The proposed antenna was fabricated according to the param-
when mm and mm. eter values in the captions of Fig. 2, and its photograph is shown
in Fig. 8. Fig. 9 demonstrates the measured reflection coeffi-
D. The Ground Sizes cient with the Agilent-N5230A vector network analyzer. There
The effects of the ground sizes on the antenna radiation is some discrepancy between the simulation and experiment due
patterns were researched by simulation. The radiation patterns mainly to the errors in processing and the effect of the SMA
are slightly affected at the lower frequency band. With the connector, which introduces a varying reactance, leading to the
frequency increasing, especially when the frequency is higher movement of resonant points, especially for the lowest one.
than 8 GHz, they are sensitive to the variation of the ground The radiation characteristics of the antenna were measured
sizes. Fig. 7(a) gives the simulated radiation patterns at 10 GHz in the anechoic chamber. Fig. 10 shows the measured gain and
with different values of . It is shown that the maximum radiation efficiency curves between 2.3–20 GHz. It is concluded
radiation deviates evidently from the broadside when the value that the radiation efficiency varies from 0.75 to 0.97, while the
DENG et al.: CPW-FED PLANAR PRINTED MONOPOLE ANTENNA WITH IMPEDANCE BANDWIDTH ENHANCED 1397

terns at 2.3, 10, and 15 GHz. It is indicated by the results that


the antenna exhibits good radiation characteristics, except that
the cross-polarization level rises with the frequency increasing.
It is mainly caused by the horizontal components of the sur-
face currents. However, for mobile environments with consid-
erable amount of multipath propagations, this would have less
impact on the system performances. It is notable here that the
novel configuration was optimized mainly for broadening the
impedance bandwidth of a CPW-fed rectangular planar printed
Fig. 9. Measured and simulated reflection coefficient. antenna. The methods to reduce the cross-polarization levels at
the higher frequencies are being researched.

V. CONCLUSION
It was pointed out by much research that the bandwidth of
the planar printed rectangular monopole was narrower than the
circular or elliptical ones. However, by the M-shaped notch at
the patch bottom and the proposed ground configurations in this
letter, its bandwidth can be widened to 164%. The bandwidth
of the proposed antenna is about 2.3 times of the conventional
Fig. 10. Measured antenna gain and radiation efficiency. one and is also wider than many other ones reported before.
The antenna exhibits a simple structure, small sizes, and good
wideband characteristic. It is a good candidate for the portable
mobile communication systems.

REFERENCES
[1] X. L. Liang, S. S. Zhong, and W. Wang, “UWB printed circular
monopole antenna,” Microw. Opt. Tech. Lett., vol. 48, no. 8, pp.
1532–1534, Aug. 2006.
[2] W. Tong and Z. R. Hu, “A CWP fed circular monopole antenna for ultra
wideband wireless communications,” in Proc. IEEE AP-S Int. Symp.,
2005, vol. 3A, pp. 528–531.
[3] N. W. Chen and Y. C. Liang, “Coplanar-waveguide fed circular disc
monopole antenna with improved radiation characteristics,” in 2nd
Proc. Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag., Edinburgh, U.K., 2007, pp. 1–6.
[4] J. Liang, L. Guo, C. C. Chiau, X. Chen, and C. G. Parini, “Study
of CPW-fed circular disc monopole antenna for ultra wideband ap-
plications,” in Proc. IEE Microw. Antennas Propag., Dec. 2005, pp.
520–526.
[5] C. M. Lee, T. C. Yo, C. H. Luo, C. H. Tu, and Y. Z. Juang, “Broadband
disk monopole antenna with a circular CPW-feeding line,” in Proc.
IEEE AP-S Int. Symp., Honoluu, HI, 2007, pp. 773–776.
[6] S. S. Zhong, X. L. Liang, and W. Wang, “Compact elliptical monopole
antenna with impedance bandwidth in excess of 21:1,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3082–3085, Nov. 2007.
[7] X. X. He and H. W. Deng, “Modified ultra wideband circular printed
monopole antenna,” Trans. Nan Jing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., vol.
25, no. 3, pp. 214–218, Sep. 2008.
[8] D. Abed, H. Kimouche, and B. Atrouz, “Small-size printed CPW-fed
antenna for ultra-wideband communications,” Electron. Lett., vol. 44,
no. 17, pp. 1003–1005, Aug. 2008.
[9] M. John and M. J. Ammann, “Optimization of impedance bandwidth
for the printed rectangular monopole antenna,” Microw. Opt. Technol.
Lett., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 153–154, Aug. 2005.
[10] M. Ojaroudi, C. Ghobadi, and J. Nourinia, “Small square monopole an-
tenna with inverted T-shaped notch in the ground plane for UWB ap-
plication,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 8, pp. 728–731,
Jul. 2009.
[11] M. H. Al Sharkawy, A. A. Eldek, A. Z. Elsherbeni, and C. E. Smith,
“Design of wideband printed monopole antenna using WIPL-D,” in
Proc. 20th Annu. Rev. Prog. Appl. Comput. Electromagn., Syracuse,
NY, Apr. 2004, pp. 166–169.
Fig. 11. Measured antenna radiation patterns: (a) 2.3, (b) 10, and (c) 15 GHz. [12] K. P. Ray and Y. Ranga, “Printed rectangular monopole antenna,” in
Proc. IEEE AP-S Int. Symp., 2006, pp. 1636–1639.
[13] K. P. Ray, Y. Ranga, and P. Gabhale, “Printed square monopole an-
antenna gain changes from 0.7 to 4.4 dBi across the frequency tenna with semicircular base for ultra-wide bandwidth,” Electron. Lett.,
band. Fig. 11 exhibits the measured azimuth and elevation pat- vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 13–14, Mar. 2007.

You might also like