Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City
on the
Municipality of Kawit
Province of Cavite
Introduction
The Municipality of Kawit is located within the province of Cavite, Region IV-A
(CALABARZON) west of the island of Luzon. It is particularly situated in the northern part of
the province and is bounded by Cavite City and Bacoor Bay in the north, the City of Bacoor
in the east, City of Imus in the southeast, the Municipality of General Trias in the south and
the Municipality of Noveleta in the west.
The Municipality covers a total area of about 1,667.24 hectares based on the cadastral
survey which constitutes 1.2948 percent of the total area of the Province of Cavite. It
consists of 23 barangays and is classified as an urban 1 st class municipality. It has a total
population of 83,466 and total households of 21,018.
The Municipality is geared towards providing the best quality service to clientele, particularly
the constituents of Kawit. That the people may be able to exercise their rights and provide
the basic needs, and initiate economic developmental programs and projects by means of
true public service under a clean and safe environment.
Financial and compliance were conducted on the accounts and operations of the
Municipality for Calendar Year (CY) 2018. The audit was conducted to ascertain the
fairness of the presentation of the financial statements and compliance of the Municipality
with laws, rules and regulations, as well as the economical, efficient and effective utilization
of resources.
Financial Highlights
The Comparative Financial Position and Results of Operations of the Municipality for CY
2018 are summarized as follows:
i
Office to reconcile their records, which posted a difference in balances of P53,166,748.87 as
of December 31, 2018, contrary to Section 114 of the Manual on the New Government
Accounting System (MNGAS) for Local Governments Units (LGUs), Volume l. Moreover, Re-
al Property Tax (RPT) and Special Education Tax (SET) Receivables as of December 31,
2018 reflected a balance of P2,996,388.99 and P2,553,051.90, respectively, or a total of
P5,549,440.89 while the Certified List of RPT Delinquencies, prepared by the Municipal
Treasurer showed a total of P21,671,332.47 inclusive of penalty of P9,904,850.83 hence, a
difference of P16,121,891.58 between the accounting and treasury records, thereby casting
doubt on the accuracy and reliability of the reported balances of the RPT and SET
Receivable accounts.
The other observations that need immediate attention and action are as follows:
We also recommended that the Municipal Mayor instruct the Municipal Budget
Officer, Municipal Accountant, and Municipal Treasurer to exercise diligence,
prudence, and proper control in the disposition of the Municipality’s funds and
limit expenditures within the total income realized and collected during the year to
avoid incurrence of cash overdraft.
We also recommended that the Municipal Treasurer revisit the tax collections in
2018 and review the computation made starting on the top taxpayers in order to
ii
collect from those with under-assessed or erroneously computed taxes.
Otherwise, Notices of Charge will be issued for any under-collection found in
audit.
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor direct both the Municipal Treasurer
and the Accountant to effect the immediate remittance of the taxes due to the
BIR. Henceforth, withheld taxes due the BIR be remitted on or before the 10th day
of the month following the month in which withholding was made as required
under BIR Regulation No. 2-98 to prevent incurrence of surcharges and penalties
for late remittances.
4. Only P12,145,831.15 or 59.6 per cent of the total appropriations for Local Risk
Reduction Management Fund for the year including the previous years’
continuing appropriation of P20,378,426.29 was utilized as of December 31,
2018, and the Monthly Report on Sources and Utilization of the Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Fund was not prepared and submitted to the COA
Auditor contrary to the requirements provided for under the provisions of COA
Circular No. 2012-002 thus not delivery of related services to target beneficiaries
were not optimized.
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor effect the optimum utilization of the
MDRRMF in order to strengthen the Municipality’s disaster preparedness and
direct the MDRRMO to submit the Monthly Report on Sources and Utilization of
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund to facilitate proper monitoring
and evaluation of the utilization of the MDRRMF.
6. The Notice of Award, Notice to Proceed and Contracts for the projects under the
20% Development Fund were not posted in the Philippine Government
iii
Electronics Procurement System (PhilGEPS) contrary to Section 37.1.6 and
37.4.2 of the Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (RIRR) of Republic
Act (RA) No. 9184, thus, transparency in the procurement process and prompt
implementation of procurement contracts were not attained.
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor direct the BAC Secretariat to comply
with the required postings of the Notice of Award, Notice to Proceed and
Contract in the PhilGEPS and in the website of the Municipality, if any, within
three and 15 calendar days, respectively, from their issuance.
7. The Municipality did not prepare the Project Procurement Management Plan
(PPMP) and Annual Procurement Plan (APP) for Infrastructure Projects for CY
2018 as required under Sections 7.1 and 7.3.2 of the Implementing Rules and
Regulations (IRR)-A of the Republic Act No. 9184 and Section 4 of the Local
Government Units Procurement Manual, thus, proper planning and monitoring of
the Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs) of the Municipality were not
assured.
We recommended that the Municipal Budget Officer and the BAC Chairman
ensure that the required PPMP and APP for Infrastructure Projects are prepared
and approved before any procurement of goods, services and civil works is
undertaken to properly plan and monitor the priority projects of the Municipality
for a particular budget year.
The above observations and recommendations were discussed with the concerned
Municipality officials and staff in an exit conference held on June 20, 2019. Management’s
views and comments were incorporated in the report, where appropriate.
There were no audit suspensions, disallowances and charges as of December 31, 2018.
Of the 22 audit recommendations contained in the 2017 Annual Audit Report (AAR),
10 were fully implemented, seven were partially implemented, while the remaining five were
not implemented.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part Subject No.
IV Appendices
1 - Statement of Financial Position (By Fund) 55
2 - Statement of Financial Performance (By Fund) 56
3 - Statement of Changes in Net Assets/Equity (By Fund) 57
4 - Statement of Cash Flows (By Fund) 58
5 - List of Implemented Projects 59
MUNICIPALITY OF KAWIT
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As at December 31, 2018
(With Comparative Figures for CY 2017)
Non-Current Assets
Investments 7 1,030,713.70 1,030,713.70
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net 8 384,493,460.85 357,344,517.94
Total Non-Current Assets 385,524,174.55 358,375,231.64
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Financial Liabilities 9 P 67,872,432.29 P 31,744,872.23
Inter-Agency Payables 10 44,866,699.35 41,356,310.10
Intra-Agency Payables 11 5,470,026.16 21,956,429.07
Trust Liabilities 12 11,769,509.81 11,814,662.21
Deferred Credits/Unearned Income 13 48,978,501.83 56,324,403.46
Total Current Liabilities 178,957,169.44 163,196,677.07
Non-Current Liabilities
Other Payables 14 6,614,471.25 6,614,471.25
Total Non-Current Liabilities 6,614,471.25 6,614,471.25
NET ASSETS/EQUITY
Government Equity 15 370,842,892.40 346,990,374.28
4
MUNICIPALITY OF KAWIT
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
(With Comparative Figures for CY 2017)
5
MUNICIPALITY OF KAWIT
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS/EQUITY
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
(With Comparative Figures for CY 2017)
6
MUNICIPALITY OF KAWIT
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
(With Comparative Figures for CY 2017)
7
Municipality of Kawit
STATEMENT OF COMPARISON OF BUDGET AND ACTUAL AMOUNTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
2. Non-Tax Revenue
a. Service Income 78,654,636.41 78,654,636.41 0.00 19,035,777.70 59,618,858.71
b. Business Income 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,963,195.00 (11,963,195.00)
c.Other Income and Receipts 482,324.85 482,324.85 0.00 6,201,278.92 (5,718,954.07)
Total Non-Tax Revenue 79,136,961.26 79,136,961.26 0.00 37,200,251.62 41,936,709.64
B. External Sources
Share from National Internal Revenue Taxes (IRA) 157,741,411.00 157,741,411.00 0.00 157,741,411.00 0.00
Share from PCSO 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 868,253.88 131,746.12
Share from GOCCs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grants and Donations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Revenues and Receipts 388,533,330.61 388,533,330.61 0.00 260,791,829.96 127,741,500.65
Expenditures
General Public Services
Personnel Services 49,059,025.96 49,059,025.96 0.00 37,340,071.84 11,718,954.12
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 118,338,858.68 118,338,858.68 0.00 84,861,708.38 33,477,150.30
Capital Outlay 11,718,500.00 11,718,500.00 0.00 2,590,828.83 9,127,671.17
Education
Personnel Services 2,600,000.00 2,600,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,600,000.00
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 18,117,378.92 18,117,378.92 0.00 5,861,066.59 12,256,312.33
Capital Outlay 3,689,734.43 3,689,734.43 0.00 613,900.00 3,075,834.43
Health, Nutrition and Population Control
Personnel Services 12,662,200.76 12,662,200.76 0.00 10,125,831.49 2,536,369.27
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 5,080,761.44 5,080,761.44 0.00 3,651,447.27 1,429,314.17
Capital Outlay 700,000.00 700,000.00 0.00 450,000.00 250,000.00
Social Services and Social Welfare
Personnel Services 4,168,926.02 4,168,926.02 0.00 3,044,989.95 1,123,936.07
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 5,507,414.11 5,507,414.11 0.00 829,722.61 4,677,691.50
Capital Outlay 218,000.00 218,000.00 0.00 132,500.00 85,500.00
8
Revenue
A. Local Sources
Economic Services
Personnel Services 18,607,625.56 18,607,625.56 0.00 13,927,037.56 4,680,588.00
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 4,022,213.12 4,022,213.12 0.00 2,231,330.20 1,790,882.92
Capital Outlay 920,100.00 920,100.00 0.00 346,655.30 573,444.70
Other Purposes:
Debt Service
Financial Expenses
Amortization
LDRRMF
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 13,551,310.86 13,551,310.86 0.00 9,382,059.66 4,169,251.20
Capital Outlay 4,655,000.00 4,655,000.00 0.00 1,871,000.00 2,784,000.00
20% Development Fund
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Capital Outlay 31,548,282.20 31,548,282.20 0.00 17,256,437.47 14,291,844.73
Allocation for Senior Citizens and PWD
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 2,850,000.00 2,850,000.00 0.00 1,059,021.00 1,790,979.00
Others
Personnel Services
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 87,641,812.66 87,641,812.66 0.00 55,083,661.38 32,558,151.28
Capital Outlay 5,560,000.00 5,560,000.00 0.00 5,464,441.00 95,559.00
Total Appropriations 401,217,144.72 401,217,144.72 0.00 256,123,710.53 145,093,434.19
9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Profile
The Municipality of Kawit is located within the province of Cavite, Region IV-A
(CALABARZON) west of the Island of Luzon. It is particularly situated in the
northern part of the province and is bounded by Cavite City and Bacoor Bay
in the north, the City of Bacoor in the east, City of Imus in the southeast,
Municipality of General Trias in the south and the Municipality of Noveleta in
the west. It covers a total area of about 1,667.24 hectares based on the
cadastral survey which constitutes 1.2948 percent of the total area of the
Province of Cavite. It consists of 23 barangays and is classified as an urban
1st class municipality.
The local government unit is geared towards providing the best quality
service to clientele, particularly the constituents of Kawit. That the people
may be able to exercise their rights and provide the basic needs and initiate
economic developmental programs and projects by means of true public
service under a clean and safe environment.
The key officials of the Municipality and the number of its personnel
complement are as follows:
a. Key Officials
10
b. No. of Personnel Complement
Permanent : 143
Temporary/Casual/Contractual/Job Order : 318
Elective Officials : 12
Coterminous : 10
Total 483
Note 2 - The consolidated financial statements of the Municipality of Kawit have been
prepared in accordance with and comply with the Philippine Public Sector
Accounting Standards (PPSAS). The consolidated financial statements are
presented in pesos, which is the functional and reporting currency of the
Municipality. The accounting policies have been applied starting the year
2015.
The Municipality recognizes revenues from taxes and fines when the event
occurs and the asset recognition criteria are met. To the extent that there is a
related condition attached that would give rise to a liability to repay the
amount, liability is recognized instead of revenue. Other non-exchange
revenues are recognized when it is improbable that the future economic
benefit or service potential associated with the asset will flow to the entity and
the fair value of the asset can be measured reliably.
11
Revenue from Exchange Transactions
Rendering of services
All property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and impairment losses. Cost includes expenditure that is directly
attributable to the acquisition of the items. When significant parts of property,
plant and equipment are required to be replaced at intervals, the Municipality
recognizes such parts as individual assets with specific useful lives and
depreciates them accordingly. Likewise, when a major inspection is
performed, its cost is recognized in the carrying amount of the plant and
equipment as a replacement if the recognition criteria are satisfied. All other
repair and maintenance costs are recognized in surplus or deficit as incurred.
Where an asset is acquired in a non-exchange transaction for nil or nominal
consideration the asset is initially measured at its fair value.
Financial Assets
12
Financial Liabilities
All financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value and, in the case of
loans and borrowings.
Subsequent measurement
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and cash at bank-
deposits on call and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less, which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash
and are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. For the purpose of
the consolidated statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist
of cash and short-term deposits as defined above, net of outstanding bank
overdrafts.
3.6 Inventories
After initial recognition, inventory is measured at the lower of cost and net
realizable value. However, to the extent that a class of inventory is distributed
or deployed at no charge or for a nominal charge, that class of inventory is
measured at the lower of cost and current replacement cost.
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of
operations, less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs
necessary to make the sale, exchange, or distribution. Inventories are
recognized as an expense when deployed for utilization or consumption in
the ordinary course of operations of the Municipality.
The annual budget is prepared on the modified cash basis, that is, all planned
costs and income are presented in a single statement to determine the needs
13
of the LGU. As a result of the adoption of the Modified cash basis for
budgeting purposes, there are basis, timing or entity differences that would
require reconciliation between the actual comparable amounts and the
amounts presented as a separate additional financial statement in the
statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts. Explanatory
comments are provided in the notes to the annual financial statements; first,
the reasons for overall growth or decline in the budget are stated, followed by
details of overspending or underspending on line items.
The useful lives and residual values of assets are assessed using the
following indicators to inform potential future use and value from disposal:
Receivables
The LGU limits its exposure to credit risk by investing cash and cash
equivalents with only reputable financial institutions that have a sound credit
rating, and within specific guidelines set in accordance with the Sanggunian’s
approved investment policy. Consequently, the Municipality does not
consider there to be any significant exposure to credit risk.
14
Note 4 - Cash and Cash Equivalents
2018 2017
Cash on Hand
Cash Local Treasury P 3,346,748.73 P 1,478,129.98
Cash in Bank-Local Currency
Cash in Bank-Local Currnecy, Current Account 144,232,847.28 105,300,305.21
Total Cash and Cash Equivalent P 147,579,596.01 P 106,778,435.19
Note 5 – Receivables
15
Due from Local Government Units under the General Fund in the amount of
P34,649.86 refers to expenses paid by the Municipality of Kawit in favor of the 23
barangays of Kawit. This consists of Rental Fee for the use of ECPAC Systems
Software and Office Supplies used in the preparation of Financial Reports of the
Barangay.
Due from Other Funds under the General Fund amounting to P216,900.01
pertains to the erroneous transfer of Landtax due to SEF. This was returned to
the General Fund in March 2019.
Due from Other Funds under the Special Education Fund amounting to
P16,542.19 pertains to SEF collection but was deposited under the General
Fund. This was corrected in March 2019.
Due from Other Funds under the Trust Fund amounting to P5,086,983.96
represents the General Fund operating expenses paid in previous years
amounting to P3,327,283.06, unexpended balance on 2018 MDRRM Fund which
was transferred to Trust Fund in January 2019 amounting to P1,732,600.90 and
the cost of check booklets amounting to P27,100.00.
The Advances to Officers and Employees account under the General Fund
and Trust Fund amounted to P2,864,100.00. The amount of P2,662,500.00
pertains to the Confidential Fund for the 4 th Quarter of 2018 which was liquidated
in January 2019. The amount of P32,400.00 refers to the balance under the Trust
Fund. Breakdown as follows:
16
Note 6 - Inventories
As of December 31, 2018, the total Inventory for Consumption has been
recognized in the corresponding expense account amounting to P 138,419.46
which pertains to the unused inventory balances. Breakdown as follows:
2018 2017
General Fund 376,160,734.50 351,114,810.43
Special Education Fund 8,332,726.35 6,229,707.51
Trust Fund 0.00 0.00
Total 384,493,460.85 357,344,517.94
General
17
Sports Equipment 565,726.00 184,112.00 749,838.00
Other Machinery and Equipment 14,495,909.00 61,800.00 14,557,709.00
Motor Vehicles 16,993,452.71 2,874,600.00 19,868,052.71
Watercrafts 80,000.00 0.00 80,000.00
Other Transportation Equipment 2,200.00 0.00 2,200.00
Furniture and Fixtures 20,754,292.57 1,543,171.33 22,297,463.90
Books 9,225.00 0.00 9,225.00
Construction in Progress-Infrastructure Assets 17,757,905.28 (10,123,199.00) 7,634,706.28
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 177,783.25 0.00 177,783.25
Total Property, Plant and Equipment 432,150,554.46 39,004,737.49 471,155,291.95
Less: Accumulated Depreciation (81,035,744.03) (13,958,813.42) (94,994,557.45)
Net Cost P 351,114,810.43 P 25,045,924.07 P 376,160,734.50
2018 2017
Accounts Payable P 65,259,104.30 P 29,435,027.04
Due to Officers and Employees 2,613,327.99 2,309,845.19
Total P 67,872,432.29 P 31,744,872.23
Accounts Payable pertains to the amount due to suppliers and other creditors. A
reclassification of account was made to correct the account which was
erroneously recorded as Accounts Payable but should be Due to Officers and
Employees during the previous year.
18
Note 10 - Inter-Agency Payables
Due to BIR account under the Special Education Fund (SEF) and Trust Fund
(TF) amounting to P225,637.39 and P 63,202.14, respectively, represents the
unremitted BIR deductions from suppliers as of December 31, 2018. Only the
amount under the SEF was remitted on January 10, 2019.
Due to GSIS, Pag-ibig and Philhealth under the General Fund amounting to
P1,489,133.28 represents the amounts deducted from the salaries of officers and
employees which was also remitted in January 2019.
Due to LGUs account under the General Fund and SEF includes the Provincial
and Barangay Shares on Real Property Taxes which was remitted in February
2019.
19
Note 11– Intra Agency Payables
2018 2017
General Fund P 5,103,526.15 P 21,956,429.07
Special Education Fund 173,300.01 0.00
Trust Fund 193,200.00 0.00
Total P 5,470,026.16 P 21,956,429.07
2018 2017
Trust Liabilities-DRRMF P 6,711,183.34 P 6,711,183.34
Bail Bonds Payable 88,336.33 127,321.83
Guaranty/Security Deposits Payable 4,969,990.14 4,976,157.04
Total P 11,769,509.81 P 11,814,662.21
The amount of P6,161,317.66 under the Trust Fund is the MDRRM Fund
maintained and shall be utilized according to the Continuing Appropriations Plan
prepared by the MDRRMC and duly approved by the Local Chief Executive.
Deferred RPT and Special Education Tax represent the remaining balance on
RPT/SET receivable set-up in the beginning of the year.
20
Note 15 – Government Equity
2018 2017
Beginning Balance P 346,990,374.28 P 316,185,649.14
Add (Deduct)
Prior Period Errors (3,310,994.91) 17,188,750.37
Restated Balance 343,679,379.37 333,374,399.51
Add (Deduct) Changes in Net Assets/
Equity during the year
Surplus(Deficit) for the period 27,163,513.03 13,615,974.77
Ending Balance P 370,842,892.40 P 346,990,374.28
2018 2017
Tax Revenue
Community Tax P 1,181,817.05 P 1,301,378.69
Property
Real Pproperty Tax-Basic 10,252,940.95 6,920,212.36
Less: Discount on Real Property Tax-Basic (694,537.07) (495,042.27)
Special Education Tax 11,487,448.56 7,841,132.49
Less: Discount on Special Education Tax (126,308.96) (618,771.63)
Goods and Services
Business Tax 40,480,331.86 26,779,974.38
Franchise Tax 405,572.50 407,650.00
Other Local Taxes 72,430.00 69,860.00
Fines and Penalties
Tax Revenue-Fines and Penalties-Property Taxes 1,892,743.57 1,917,490.91
Tax Revenue-Fines and Penalties-Other Taxes 29,475.00 0.00
Total Tax Revenues P 64,981,913.46 P 44,123,884.93
21
2018 2017
Service Income
Permit Fees P 12,599,004.23 P 9,136,943.92
Registration Fees 1,227,095.00 990,780.75
Clearance and Certification Fees 2,360,184.55 2,111,472.00
Inspection Fees 349,040.00 302,715.00
Fees for Sealing and Licensing of Weights
and Measures 55,080.00 59,100.00
Fines and Penalties-Service Income 419,224.12 395,308.58
Other Service Income 2,026,149.80 2,102,836.50
Business Income
Rent Income 1,500,000.00 0.00
Parking Fees 344,560.00 188,950.00
Receipts from Market Operation 10,005,335.00 9,993,489.90
Receipts from Cemetery Operation 113,300.00 73,900.00
Net Sales Revenue 0.00 4,577.66
Garbage Fees 5,091,936.92 1,522,750.00
Hospital Fees 1,025,093.00 871,886.00
Fines and Penalties-Business Income 84,249.00 92,766.00
Total Service and Business Income 37,200,251.62 27,847,476.31
2018 2017
Personnel Services
Salaries and Wages-Regular P 38,429,962.85 P 35,289,736.60
Salaries and Wages-Casual/Contractual 0.00 1,033,476.19
Other Compensation
Personnel Economic Relief Allowance (PERA) 3,902,000.00 3,892,000.00
Representation Allowance (RA) 2,116,497.50 2,050,915.00
Transportation Allowance (TA) 2,028,988.95 2,050,915.00
Clothing/Uniform Allowance 830,000.00 835,000.00
Productivity Incentive Allowance 810,000.00 806,000.00
Honoraria 0.00 0.00
Hazard Pay 199,500.00 218,500.00
Longevity Pay 70,000.00 180,000.00
Overtime and Night Pay 1,590,501.15 1,055,188.19
Year End Bonus 3,298,993.40 4,343,380.05
Cash Gift 810,000.00 813,500.00
Other Bonuses and Allowances 3,168,192.50 0.00
Personnel Benefits Contributions
Life and Retirement Insurance Contributions 4,568,648.96 4,230,586.53
Pag-IBIG Contributions 764,653.38 699,509.57
PhilHealth Contributions 487,541.03 392,575.00
Employees Compensation Insurance Premiums 184,617.98 186,763.27
Other Personnel Benefits
Terminal Leave Benefits 2,324,973.41 4,291,449.98
Other Personnel Benefits 419,343.00 522,396.84
Total P 66,004,414.11 P 62,891,892.22
22
Note 21 – Maintenance and Operating Expenses
2018 2017
Regular Maintenance and Operating Expenses
Travelling Expenses
Travelling Expenses-Local P 1,281,305.83 P 1,264,105.48
Travelling Expenses-Foreign 0.00 0.00
Training and Scholarship Expenses
Training Expenses 7,630,138.98 3,924,111.24
Supplies and Materials Expenses
Office Supplies Expenses 7,294,957.77 4,090,388.84
Accountable Forms Expenses 322,085.54 152,169.55
Non-Accountable Forms Expenses 33,319.00 15,580.00
Drugs and Medicines Expenses 759,364.70 574,253.31
Medical, Dental and Laboratory Supplies Expenses 678,809.10 135,077.97
Fuel, Oil and Lubricants Expenses 2,320,300.43 3,044,803.25
Textbooks and Instructional Materials Expenses 0.00 0.00
Other Supplies Expenses 7,230,121.60 1,628,015.00
Utility Expenses
Water Expenses 384,758.94 334,092.42
Electricity Expenses 6,572,355.05 6,111,249.48
Communication Expenses
Telephone Expenses 1,578,866.33 1,611,294.59
Internet Subscription Expenses 7,085.25 6,723.90
Survey, Research, Exploration and Development Expenses
Survey Expenses 52,000.00 0.00
Confidential, Intelligence, Extraordinary and Miscellaneous Expenses
Confidential Expenses 7,987,500.00 6,620,000.00
Extraordinary Miscellaneous Expenses 0.00 1,632.00
Contracted Services
Auditing Services 0.00 0.00
Consultancy Services 991,500.00 5,800,000.00
Environment/Sanitary Services 28,469,792.75 27,826,667.79
Other Professional Services 3,536,008.00 0.00
Janitorial Services 2,280,983.65 1,931,626.96
Security Services 7,247,556.34 1,802,842.36
Other General Services 13,167,681.65 10,382,811.11
Repairs and Maintenance
Repairs and Maintenance-Infrastructure Assets 270,262.53 110,166.57
Repairs and Maintenance-Buildings and Other Structures 1,237,512.02 7,069,011.02
Repairs and Maintenance-Machineries and Equipment 375,466.75 329,163.50
Repairs and Maintenance-Transportation Equipment 1,654,073.80 1,567,233.08
Repairs and Maintenance-Other Property, Plant and Equipment 0.00 135,265.50
23
Taxes, Insurance Premiums and Other Fees
Taxes, Duties and Licenses 18,167.62 35,638.95
Fidelity Bond Premiums 139,096.50 85,746.00
Insurance Expenses 1,001,420.36 820,663.93
Other Maintenance and Operating Expenses
Advertising Expenses 264,614.00 357,440.00
Printing and Publication Expenses 0.00 0.00
Representation Expenses 6,834,344.00 9,379,724.56
Rent Expenses 1,612,227.37 287,600.00
Membership Dues and Contributions to Organizations 289,790.00 76,800.00
Donations 20,158,615.97 31,831,937.75
Other Maintenance and Operating Expenses 83,488.59 8,726.22
Total P 133,765,570.42 P 129,352,562.33
2018 2017
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation-Land Improvements 495.30 495.30
Depreciation-Infrastructure Assets 3,891,838.18 3,691,432.62
Depreciation-Buildings and Structures 4,317,647.21 4,196,647.79
Depreciation-Machinery and Equipment 4,616,026.33 4,625,792.10
Depreciation-Transportation Equipment 1,510,769.94 1,081,597.02
Depreciation-Furniture, Fixtures and Books 564,328.81 540,472.16
Depreciation-Other PPE 16,000.49 16,000.49
Total 14,917,106.26 14,152,437.48
24
Note 24 - Reconciliation of Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities to Surplus
Personnel
Income Services MOOE Capital Outlay
General Fund
Statement of Comparison of
Budget and Actual Amounts P 260,791,829.96 P 64,437,930.84 P 162,960,017.09 P 28,725,762.60
Basis Differences:
Income not considered budgetary items (19,196,167.49) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Receipts not considered as income 254,941.35 0.00 0.00 0.00
Budgetary items not considered
as expenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-cash expenses 0.00 0.00 14,917,106.26 0.00
Capital Expenditures 0.00 0.00 0.00 (28,725,762.60)
Timing Differences:
Unconsumed Inventories
charged to current
appropriations 0.00 0.00 (138,419.46) 0.00
Commitments (Obligated
but not billed) 0.00 1,566,483.27 (29,056,027.21) 0.00
Per Statement of Financial
Performance P 241,850,603.82 P 66,004,414.11 P 148,682,676.68 P (0.00)
25
PART II – AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The correctness and reliability of the year-end balances of the various Property,
Plant and Equipment (PPE) accounts totaling P487,921,290.36 could not be
established due to the continued inability of both the Accounting and the General
Services Office to reconcile their records, which posted a difference in balances
of P53,166,748.87 as of December 31, 2018, contrary to Section 114 of the Manual
on the New Government Accounting System (MNGAS) for Local Governments
Units (LGUs), Volume l.
Section C.3, Chapter V of the Manual on Property Custodianship provides that after the
physical inventory taking, the Inventory Committee shall reconcile the results of the
count with the records of the Property Office and the Accounting Office. The inventory
listing of the equipment shall be checked with property cards maintained by the
Accounting Office, and the totals thereof shall be checked with property cards
maintained by the Accounting Office, and the totals thereof shall be compared with those
in the general ledger.
Paragraph 4 of Section 114 of the MNGAS for LGUs, Volume l likewise provides that the
property balances between the accounting and property records should always be
reconciled. Further, Section 491 of the Government Accounting and Auditing Manual
(GAAM), Volume l states that all discrepancies between the physical and book must be
cleared and investigated.
Per
PPE Account Per Books GSO/RPCPPE Variance
(At Cost)
Land and Land Improvements
Land 136,205,886.67 136,205,886.67 0.00
Land Improvements
Land Improvement and Agricultural Structures 52,074,424.62 0.00 52,074,424.62
Other Land Improvements 1,285,611.71 1,285,611.71 0.00
Infrastructure Assets
Road Networks 11,210,942.95 11,210,942.95 0.00
Flood Control System 14,185,264.64 14,185,264.64 0.00
Water Supply System 79,885.00 0.00 79,885.00
Parks, Plazas and Monuments 4,602,522.95 4,602,522.95 0.00
Other Infrastructure Assets 70,603,136.81 70,602,256.81 880.00
26
Building and Other Structures
Buildings 61,633,173.51 61,633,173.51 0.00
School Buildings 8,019,572.57 7,257,929.07 761,643.50
Hospitals and health Centers 1,022,721.00 1,022,721.00 0.00
Markets 2,111,275.39 2,111,275.39 0.00
Other structures 23,673,784.88 23,615,785.38 57,999.50
Machinery and Equipment
Machinery 166,683.00 166,683.00 0.00
Office Equipment 6,809,806.66 6,809,806.66 0.00
Information Communication Technology Equipment 19,061,902.63 19,061,902.63 0.00
Communication Equipment 528,459.75 528,459.75 0.00
Disaster Response and Rescue Equipment 2,529,678.00 2,529,678.00 0.00
Military Police and Security Equipment 2,216,290.00 2,216,290.00 0.00
Medical Equipment 762,334.00 762,334.00 0.00
Sports Equipment 808,363.00 749,838.00 58,525.00
Technical and Scientific Equipment 101,250.00 0.00 101,250.00
Othr Machinery and Equipment 14,557,709.00 14,557,709.00 0.00
Motor Vehicles 19,868,052.71 19,868,052.71 0.00
Watercrafts 80,000.00 80,000.00 0.00
Other Transportation Equipment 2,200.00 2,200.00 0.00
Furniture and Fixtures 25,794,843.38 25,866,503.13 (71,659.75)
Books 113,026.00 9,225.00 103,801.00
Construction in Progress
Construction in Progress-Infrastructure Assets 7,634,706.28 7,634,706.28 0.00
Other Property Plant and Equipment
Other Property Plant and Equipment 177,783.25 177,783.25 0.00
Total Property Plant and Equipment 487,921,290.36 434,754,541.49 53,166,748.87
We reiterated our previous year’s recommendation that the Municipal Mayor direct
the Municipal Accountant and the Municipal General Service Officer to exert
efforts to analyze and reconcile the discrepancy of P53,166,748.87 between the
accounting records and the RCPPE and make the adjustments where necessary.
Management’s Comment:
The GSO Officer and the Municipal Accountant assured that they will continue the
process of reconciling their records. Piecemeal submission of RPCPPE will also be
avoided.
2. Real Property Tax (RPT) and Special Education Tax (SET) Receivables as of
December 31, 2018 reflected a balance of P2,996,388.99 and P2,553,051.90,
respectively, or a total of P5,549,440.89 while the Certified List of RPT
Delinquencies, prepared by the Municipal Treasurer showed a total of
P21,671,332.47 inclusive of penalty of P9,904,850.83 hence, a difference of
P16,121,891.58 between the accounting and treasury records, thereby casting
27
doubt on the accuracy and reliability of the reported balances of the RPT and SET
Receivable accounts.
Section 20 of the Manual on the New Government Accounting System (NGAS) for Local
Government Units (LGUs), Volume I provides that RPT and SET Receivables shall be
established at the beginning of the year based on Real Property Tax Account
Register/Taxpayer’s index card. At the beginning of the year, the Treasurer shall furnish
the Chief Accountant of a duly certified list showing the name of taxpayers and the
amount due and collectible during the year. Based on the list, the Chief Accountant shall
draw a Journal Entry Voucher to record the debit to RPT/SET Receivable and credit to
Deferred RPT/SET Income.
Section 255 of Republic Act No. 7160 or the Local Government Code of 1991, on the
other hand, states that in case of failure to pay the basic real property tax or any other
tax levied under the Code upon the expiration of the periods provided, or when due, as
the case may be, shall subject the taxpayer to the payment of interest at the rate of two
percent (2%) per month on the unpaid amount or fraction thereof, until the delinquent tax
shall have been fully paid. Provided, however, that in no case shall the total interest on
the unpaid tax or portion thereof exceed thirty-six (36) months.
Comparison of the year-end balances of accounts RPT and SET Receivables with the
Certified List of RPT Delinquencies as of December 31, 2018 showed a difference of
P16,121,891.58 presented as follows:
Further, it was also noted that the RPT and SET Receivable Accounts amounting to
P2,996,388.99 and P2,553,051.90, respectively, were not reconciled and have a
difference of P443,337.09. Consequently, the Deferred RPT and SET Income accounts
were also not reconciled with its corresponding RPT and SET Receivable accounts.
28
Management’s Comment:
Concerned officials assured the continuous reconciliation between the records of the
Accounting with that of the Treasury.
xxx…
Any overdraft which may be incurred at the end of the year in any local fund
shall be covered with the first collections of the immediate succeeding fiscal
year accruing to such local fund.”
An overdraft exist when there is withdrawal in excess of the funds available and/or when
funds intended for specific purposes have been used or diverted to purpose other than
those which they are intended.
Section 4(3) of Presidential Decree (PD) No. 1445 provides that trust funds shall be
available and may be spent only for the specific purpose for which the trust was created
or the funds received.
29
Due to GSIS 1,234,647.59
Due to Pag-IBIG 167,988.28
Due to PhilHealth 86,497.41
Due to NGAs 1,419,186.61
Due to LGUs 4,197,207.95
Intra-Agency Payables
Due to Other Funds 5,103,526.15
Trust Liabilities
Guaranty Deposits Payable 4,249,538.93
Unexpended Balance of DRRMF:
CYs 2012 and 2018 2,071,277.47
Bail Bond Payable 40,224.19
Financial Liabilities
Accounts Payable 62,479,875.78
Due to Officers and Employees 2,611,782.55
Other Deferred Credits 19,632,071.82
Total Current Liabilities 106,623,452.70
Unexpended Balance of 20% Dev't. Fund
for CY's 2016-2018 30,265,362.01
Cash Overdraft / Deficit P (61,486,356.37)
Analysis of the above table revealed that the total cash and cash equivalents balance of
P75,402,458.34 were not enough to cover the total current liabilities of P106,623,452.70
and the unexpended balance of the 20% Development Fund of P30,265,362.01,
resulting in cash deficit of P61,486,356.37 at year-end.
The incurrence of cash deficits, which is not in line with sound financial management, is
contrary to Section 4(3) of PD No. 1445. It can be gleaned from the above table that the
Municipality even used those funds withheld and due to other government agencies as
well as other trust funds by the presence of balances of relevant payables. In effect the
Municipality may not be able to pay its current liabilities, remit inter-agency payables and
provide adequate cash back-up for its other trust liabilities.
Further analysis revealed that among the reasons for the incurrence of cash deficit is
that the Municipality did not meet their target collections for the last three years, to wit:
Target Collection
Year
per Budget Actual Collection Collection Deficit
30
As shown above, the total collection deficit for the last three years amounted to
P212,488,291.25 as only P642,028,570.81 was collected from its estimated target of
P854,516,862.06, which resulted in cash deficit.
Management’s Comment:
The Municipal Accountant told the Audit Team that the balance of Accounts Payable
which was carried forward from the previous administration was bloated. The Audit
Team and Management agreed to write-off payable balances which are not considered
valid claims.
Section 233(b) of RA 7160-On the rates of levy of RPT tax provides that:
(b) In case of a city or a municipality-at the rate not exceeding two per cent (2%) of
the assessed value of the real property.
Section 251. Tax Discount for Advanced Prompt Payment- If the basic real
property tax and the additional tax accruing to the Special Education Fund
(SEF) are paid in advance in accordance with the prescribed schedule of
payment as provided under Section 250, the Sanggunian concerned may grant
a discount not exceeding twenty percent (20%) of the annual tax due.
Section 255. Interest on Unpaid Real Property Tax.- In case of failure to pay the
basic real property tax or any other tax levied under this Title upon the expiration
of the periods as provided in Section 250, or when due, as the case may be, shall
subject the taxpayer to the payment of interest at the rate of two percent (2%) per
month on the unpaid amount or a fraction thereof, until the delinquent tax shall
have been fully paid: Provided, however, that in no case shall the total interest on
the unpaid tax or portion thereof exceed thirty-six (36) months.
31
Also, the Revised Revenue Code of the Municipality states the same provisions as
above. With regards to discounts for advance and prompt payments, the Municipality
provided the following table:
Period Amount of
No. of O.R.'s Total Amount Covered Undercollection Remarks
4 172,277.40 2015-2017 14,510.09 Penalty not imposed.
8 30,177.72 2018 886.69 Discount applied is 20 per cent instead of 10 per cent.
4 443.50 2018 561.79 Errors in computation of tax due.
62 1,702,168.98 2000-2017 234,529.57 Errors in computation of penalties.
250,488.14
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor direct the Municipal Treasurer to issue
a notice to concerned taxpayers requesting for additional payments to settle the
unpaid/errors in computation of interests on delinquent real property taxes or
refund the excess discounts given, to prevent the issuance by the Audit Team of
Notice of Charge against concerned Collecting Officers in the amount of
P250,488.14.
We also recommended that the Municipal Treasurer revisit the tax collections in
2018 and review the computation made starting on the top taxpayers in order to
collect from those with under-assessed or erroneously computed taxes.
Otherwise, Notices of Charge will be issued for any under-collection found in
audit.
32
Management’s Comment:
The Municipal Treasurer stated that this involved system errors. They agreed to issue
notices on the taxpayers with under-assessed properties and under collected taxes.
BIR Regulation No. 2-98 dated April 17,1998 mandates that taxes withheld shall be paid
on or before the tenth (10 th) of the month following the month in which withholding was
made except for taxes withheld for December which shall be filed/paid on or before
January 15 of the succeeding year.
General Ledger of the Due to BIR account as of December 31, 2018 showed that the
taxes to be remitted to the BIR is P3,329,627.97, as follows:
Beginning Tax withheld Tax remitted to
Balance during the year the BIR Ending Balance
General Fund P 2,826,849.95 P 7,165,288.02 P 6,662,510.00 P 3,329,627.97
Analysis disclosed that the total unremitted taxes of P3,329,627.97 pertains to the
unpaid claims since 2006 and taxes withheld during CY 2018 which were partially
remitted to the BIR. Further verification revealed that on January 7, 2019 the Municipality
remitted the amount of P1,608,115.48, thus, reducing the unremitted taxes to
P1,721,512.49 as of that month.
Contrary to the afore-cited BIR Regulation, the Municipality was not able to remit all the
taxes withheld in prior years within 10 days following the end of the month the
withholding was made, thus exposed the Municipality to payment of penalties and
surcharge for late remittance.
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor direct both the Municipal Treasurer
and the Accountant to effect the immediate remittance of the taxes due to the BIR.
Henceforth, withheld taxes due the BIR be remitted on or before the tenth (10 th)
day of the month following the month in which withholding was made as required
under BIR Regulation No. 2-98 to prevent incurrence of surcharges and penalties
for late remittances.
Management’s Comment:
The Municipal Accountant explained that the unremitted amount pertains to the amount
carried forward from previous years. They agreed to evaluate the amounts and remit the
same to BIR if identified as valid claims and to prepare a journal entry for reversal for
those that are not valid claims.
6. Only P12,145,831.15 or 59.6 per cent of the total appropriations for Local Risk
Reduction Management Fund for the year including the previous years’ continuing
33
appropriation of P20,378,426.29 was utilized as of December 31, 2018, and the
Monthly Report on Sources and Utilization of the Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Fund was not prepared and submitted to the COA Auditor contrary
to the requirements provided for under the provisions of COA Circular No. 2012-
002 thus not delivery of related services to target beneficiaries were not
optimized.
Commission on Audit Circular No. 2012-002 dated September 12, 2012 provides the
accounting and reporting guidelines for the Local Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Fund (LDRRMF) of Local Government Units, National Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Fund (NDRRMF) given to LGUs and receipts from other
sources. It provides, among others, the following:
4.4 The unexpended LDRRMF shall accrue to a special trust fund solely for the
purpose of supporting disaster risk reduction and management activities of the
Local Disaster Risk Reduction Council (LDRRMC) within the next five (5)
years. The LDRRMCs shall decide on the use of the unexpended balance of
the LDRRMF which shall be incorporated in the Local Disaster Risk Reduction
Fund Investment Plan (LDRRMFIP).
5.1.2 A LDRRMFIP for the DRRM program shall be prepared annually. It shall
present the 30% allocation for QRF in lump-sum and the allocation for disaster
mitigation, prevention and preparedness with details as to projects and
activities to be funded. The LDRRMFIP shall also include under a separate
caption, the list of projects and activities charged to the unexpended LDRRMF
of previous years.
5.1.5 A Report on Sources and Utilization of DRRMF using the format in Annex B
shall be prepared and certified correct by the Local Accountant. The Local
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Officer (LDRRMO) shall submit the
report on or before the 15 th day after the end of each month through the
LDRRMC and Local Development Council (LDC) to the COA auditor of the
LGU.
Review of the submitted LDRRMFIP for the CY 2018 revealed that it only include the
current year’s appropriation of P12,384,223.16. The projects and activities charged to
the unexpended LDRRMF of previous years were not identified and incorporated therein
contrary to Sections 4.4 and 5.1.2 of COA Circular No. 2012-002.
We also noted that the Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction Management Office
(MDRRMO) failed to submit the Monthly Report on Sources and Utilization of Disaster
Risk Reduction and Management Fund, thereby causing difficulty in monitoring the
efficiency of fund utilization.
On the other hand, review of the records disclosed that the Municipality did not fully
maximize the use of the current year and previous years’ available appropriations for
LDRRMF totaling P20,378,426.29 as only P12,145,831.15 or 59.6 per cent was utilized
as of December 31, 2018. Details of the Municipality’s available appropriation, utilization
and balances for LDRRMF are presented as follows:
34
Percentage
Particulars Available Amount Utilized Balance of Utilization
Current Year Appropriation:
Quick Response Fund (QRF) P 3,715,266.95 2,350,000.00 P 1,365,266.95 63%
Mitigation Fund (MF)
MOOE 5,452,996.21 5,296,851.36 156,144.85 97%
Capital Outlay 3,215,960.00 3,215,960.00 0.00 100%
Total 12,384,223.16 10,862,811.36 1,521,411.80 88%
Continuing Appropriation:
2012 1,832,885.47 1,283,019.79 549,865.68 70%
Special Trust Fund
CY 2013 3,252.77 0.00 3,252.77 0.00
CY 2014 567,269.20 0.00 567,269.20 0.00
CY 2015 2,569,749.60 0.00 2,569,749.60 0.00
CY 2016 1,640,650.08 0.00 1,640,650.08 0.00
CY 2017 1,380,396.01 0.00 1,380,396.01 0.00
Total 6,161,317.66 0.00 6,161,317.66 0.00%
Total as of December 31, 2018 P 20,378,426.29 12,145,831.15 P 8,232,595.14 59.60%
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor effect the optimum utilization of the
MDRRMF in order to strengthen the Municipality’s disaster preparedness and
direct the MDRRMO to submit the Monthly Report on Sources and Utilization of
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund to facilitate proper monitoring and
evaluation of the utilization of the MDRRMF.
Management’s Comment:
Section 3.1.1 of COA Circular No. 2009-001 dated February 12, 2009 requires that,
within five (5) working days from the execution of a contract by the government entity or
any of its subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, including government-owned and
controlled corporations and their subsidiaries, a copy of said contract and all the
documents forming part thereof by reference or incorporation shall be furnished to the
Auditor of the agency concerned.
35
Section 3.1.2 of the same Circular enumerated the copies of documents required to be
submitted as follows:
Moreover, Item 4.1 of the same COA Circular provides, “Any unjustified failure of the
officials and employees concerned to comply with the requirements herein imposed shall
be subject to the administrative disciplinary action provided in (a) Section 127 of
Presidential Decree No. 1445; (b) Section 55, Title I-B, Book V of the Revised
Administrative Code of 1987; and (c) Section 11 of Republic Act No. 6713”.
Management Comment’s:
8. The Notice of Award, Notice to Proceed and Contracts for the projects under the
20% Development Fund were not posted in the Philippine Government Electronics
Procurement System (PhilGEPS) contrary to Section 37.1.6 and 37.4.2 of the
Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (RIRR) of Republic Act (RA)
No. 9184, thus, transparency in the procurement process and prompt
implementation of procurement contracts were not attained.
Section 37.1.6 of the RIRR provides that “The BAC, through the Secretariat, shall post,
within three (3) calendar days from its issuance, the Notice of Award in the PhilGEPS,
the website of the Procuring Entity, if any, and any conspicuous place in the premises of
the Procuring Entity”.
Section 37.4.1 also provides that, “The Concerned Procuring Entity shall issue the
Notice to Proceed together with a copy or copies of the approved contract to successful
bidder within seven (7) calendar days from the date of approval of the contract by the
appropriate government approving authority. All notices called for by the terms of the
contract shall be effective only at the time of receipt thereof by the successful bidder.”
Whereas, Section 37.4.2 states that, “The Procuring Entity, through the BAC Secretariat,
shall post a copy of the Notice to Proceed and the approved contract in the PhilGEPS
and the website of the Procuring Entity, if any, within fifteen (15) calendar days from the
issuance of the Notice to Proceed.”
Verification and post audit of disbursement vouchers under the 20% Development Fund
showed no proof of posting of the Notice of Award (NOA), Notice to Proceed (NTP) and
Contract in the PhilGEPS and any conspicuous place in the premises of the following
projects:
37
Date of Date of Date of Date of
Check No. Check Name of Project Award Contract NTP
804606 12/10/2018 Improvement of Parking Area 08/10/2018 08/13/2018 08/15/2018
Improvement of Court Surface
804615 1/28/2019 (Tennis Court) 06/01/2018 06/06/2018 06/08/2018
804612 12/19/2018 Procurement of Floodlights 07/20/2018 07/25/2018 07/25/2018
804597 10/08/2018 Fabrication & Installation of Streetlights 07/27/2018 08/03/2018 08/03/2018
804605 11/23/2018 Construction of Covered Canal(Venus) 06/04/2018 06/08/2018 06/13/2018
804614 1/25/2019 Construction of Covered Canal 08/17/2018 08/20/2018 08/22/2018
804617 1/28/2019 Upgrading of Footbridge 08/17/2018 08/20/2018 08/22/2018
On going Upgrading of Covered Canal 09/17/2018 09/20/2018 09/20/2018
804607 12/19/2018 Rehabilitation of Liwasang Aguinaldo 08/30/2018 09/03/2018 09/10/2018
Improvement of Waterways (Fencing of
On going Riverbank) 12/17/2018 12/20/2018 12/20/2018
Fabrication of Municipal Segregation
804619 3/18/2019 Bin 10/09/2018 10/12/2018 10/10/2018
Fabrication of Municipal Trash
804618 3/8/2019 Container 10/09/2018 10/12/2018 10/10/2018
Thus, the BAC and its Secretariat failed to comply with the above provisions of the RIRR
for transparency purposes.
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor direct the BAC Secretariat to comply
with the required postings of the Notice of Award, Notice to Proceed and Contract
in the PhilGEPS and in the website of the Municipality, if any, within three and 15
calendar days, respectively, from their issuance.
Management’s Comment:
9. The Municipality did not prepare the Project Procurement Management Plan
(PPMP) and Annual Procurement Plan (APP) for Infrastructure Projects for CY
2018 as required under Sections 7.1 and 7.3.2 of the Implementing Rules and
Regulations (IRR)-A of the Republic Act No. 9184 and Section 4 of the Local
Government Units Procurement Manual, thus, proper planning and monitoring of
the Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs) of the Municipality were not assured.
Section 7.1 of the IRR-A provides, among others, that “No government procurement
shall be undertaken unless it is in accordance with an approved Annual Procurement
Plan.”
Section 7.3.2 of the same IRR-A also provides that: “Each procuring entity shall
judiciously prepare, maintain and update an APP for all its procurement that shall include
for each individual project, a Project Procurement Management Plan (PPMP).”
Moreover, Section 4 of the Local Government Units Procurement Manual provides that
procurement planning ensures that the overall goal of a particular project will be
38
achieved effectively and efficiently. Through plans, an LGU is able to effectively manage
and track procurement all the way to contract performance. Procurement planning
should be done within the budgetary context, reflecting the LGUs priorities and
objectives for the period.
The end-user units of the procuring entity shall prepare their respective PPMP for their
different programs, activities, and projects (PAPs). The PPMP shall contain the following
information:
As soon as the appropriation ordinance becomes final, the end-user units shall revise
and adjust the PPMP to reflect the budgetary allocation for their respective PAPs. The
revised PPMPs shall be submitted to the BAC, through its Secretariat, for the finalization
of the modes of procurement under the proposed APP.
For calendar year 2018, the Municipality had advertised in Philippine Government
Electronic Procurement System (PhilGEPS) a total procurement of P55,391,605.02,
Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) for the following infrastructure projects, to wit:
39
9. Construction of Covered Canal Located at Barangay
Wakas II 1,666,947.66 August 3, 2018
10. Upgrading of Footbridge Located at Barangay Congbalay- 1,811,900.00 August 3, 2018
Legaspi
11. Upgrading of Footbridge Located at Barangay Samala-
Marquez 1,606,832.69 August 3, 2018
12. Repair of Footbridge Located at Barangay Batong Dalig 157,870.85 August 3, 2018
13. Rehabilitation and Improvement of Liwasang Aguinaldo 7,715,390.72 August 3, 2018
14. Repair of School Buildings 1,935,146.90 September 11, 2018
15. Construction of Covered Canal Located at Barangay
Wakas II 1,666,947.66 September 4, 2018
16. Construction of Drainage Canal Located at Barangay
Manggahan-Lawin 1,000,000.00 September 4, 2018
17. Asphalting of Road Located at Barangay Manggahan-
Lawin 1,000,000.00 September 4, 2018
18. Construction of Evacuation Facility Located at Barangay
Congbalay-Legaspi 3,620,963.90 September 13, 2018
19. Improvement of Drainage Canal Located at Putol-Magdalo 1,000,000.00 October 10, 2018
20. Construction of Utility Cottage 471,284.34 October 10, 2018
21. Renovation of Day Care Centers and Municipal Social
Welfare and Development Office 1,324,440.96 November 27, 2018
22. Improvement of Waterways (Fencing of Riverbank) 399,509.78 November 30, 2018
23. Upgrading of Multipurpose Facility (Into Motorpool) 934,176.87 November 30, 2018
24. Concreting of Philippine National Police and Health Center 712,795.95 November 30, 2018
Ground
25. Construction of Fence, Drainage and Parking Area 1,838,017.92 November 30, 2018
26. Proposed Extension of New Municipal Police Station 807,076.25 November 30, 2018
27. Renovation of Day Care Centers & MSWD Office 1,324,440.96 December 14, 2018
Total 55,391,605.02
However, it was observed that the Municipality did not prepare the PPMP and APP for
the aforementioned infrastructure projects, thus, there was no guide document in the
procurement and contract implementation process, as well reference in procurement
monitoring of the above-listed infrastructure projects.
We recommended that the Municipal Budget Officer and the BAC Chairman
ensure that the required PPMP and APP for Infrastructure Projects are prepared
and approved before any procurement of goods, services and civil works is
undertaken to properly plan and monitor the priority projects of the Municipality
for a particular budget year.
Management’s Comment:
10. The fidelity bond of P225,000.00 of the Cashier, designated as Acting Disbursing
Officer of the Municipality was insufficient to cover her average cash
accountability of P5,110,479.17 under the Revised Schedule of Premium Rates
embodied in Section 5.3 of Treasury Circular No. 02-2009, thus, exposing
40
government funds to the risk of not being indemnified in case of loss through
theft, defalcations, shortages and other similar cases.
Section 4.2 of Treasury Circular No. 02-2009 (Revised Omnibus Regulations Governing
the Fidelity Bonding of Accountable Public Officers Pursuant to the Public Bonding Law)
dated August 6, 2009 states that, every officer, agent, and employee of an LGU whose
duties permit or require possession, custody or control of local government funds and
properties, including but not limited to provincial governors, city and municipal mayors,
provincial, city, municipal and barangay treasurers, and punong barangays shall be
accountable and responsible for said funds and properties for the safekeeping thereof in
conformity with law and shall be properly bonded. (Section 305(f) R.A.7160, DILG
M.C.No. 99-186, 11 Oct. 1999).
Treasury Circular No. 02-2009 provides that for cash accountability ranging from
P5,000,001.00 to P25,000,000.00, the fidelity bond should be P3,500,000.00.
Audit of the accounts of Ms. Olivia A. Ocava, Cashier II, and currently designated as
Acting Disbursing Officer, disclosed that her fidelity bond was only P225,000.00 which is
inadequate to cover for her average cash accountability of P5,110,479.17, thus, the risk
that government funds may not be recovered in case of loss through theft, defalcations,
shortages and unrelieved losses.
Amount of Cash
Month Advance
January P 4,476,878.53
February 4,369,743.69
March 5,429,474.39
April 3,084,678.89
May 8,142,149.16
June 4,655,322.20
July 4,830,573.17
August 4,684,329.15
September 4,418,630.43
October 5,703,075.57
November 7,374,759.43
December 4,156,135.39
Total P 61,325,750.00
Average Cash Advance* P 5,110,479.17
*Average cash advance = Total cash advances for the year / 12 months
Management’s Comment:
The Municipal Treasurer stated that they had already increased the amount of bond and
they will furnish the Audit Team copy of the documents.
41
Official Development Assistance (ODA) Funded Projects
The Due to GSIS and Pag-IBIG contributions of the Municipality and employees and/or
payments of loans to said agencies were withheld and remitted in compliance with
relevant rules and regulations.
Pursuant to the Department of Budget and Management and Department of the Interior
and Local Government (DBM-DILG) Joint Memorandum Circular No. 2017-1 dated
February 1, 2017, the Municipality appropriated the amount of P34,415,741.09 for
development projects. The amount was equivalent to 22 per cent of its Internal Revenue
Allotment (IRA) for the year 2018 of P157,741,411.00. Of the 20 per cent Development
Fund, P17,390,792.67 or 50.53 per cent was disbursed or obligated during the year.
There were no unsettled suspensions, disallowances and charges during the year 2018.
42
PART III – STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIOR
YEAR’S AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS
Status of Implementation of Prior Year’s Audit Recommendations
As of December 31, 2018
Of the 22 audit recommendations contained in the 2017 Annual Audit Report (AAR), 10 were fully implemented, seven were
partially implemented, while the remaining five were not implemented.
Reason for
Status of Partial/ Non-
Refe- Management’s
Audit Observation Recommendation Implemen- implemen-
rence Action
tation tation
43
a. Acknowledgement Acting Property Officer Fully
Receipt for Equipment ensures that the ARE Implemented
(ARE) and/or Property and/or PAR are issued
Acknowledgement for all PPE items.
Receipt (PAR) are
issued for all PPE
items issued to actual
recipients and/or end-
users and renewed
every three years;
44
already disposed are equipment, it is
dropped from the dropped from the
books of account; books of account
46
reports;
Part II, The aggregate balance of We recommended that The Trust Fund is Not Reiterated in
Finding P106,778,435.19 of the Cash the Municipal Mayor always utilized only for Implemented finding No.3 of
48
No. 4, and Cash Equivalents account require the Municipal which purpose it was AAR 2018.
page 35, for the General Fund (GF), Accountant and the intended for. The (Cash deficit still
2017 Special Education Fund (SEF) Municipal Treasurer to Municipal Treasurer exists in the
AAR and Trust fund (TF) was not closely monitor the cash has been instructed to Gen. Fund.)
enough to cover for the total balance of each fund and monitor the availability
current liabilities of enjoin the Municipal of funds. A certificate is
P143,983,598.41(excluding Treasurer from certifying first issued prior to
unutilized 20% Development funds availability when no conduct of bidding
Fund of P15,154,553.96) as at cash is available to avoid procedures.
end of the year, thereby cash deficits. Otherwise,
resulting in cash deficit of appropriate sanctions
P52,359,717.18 which is maybe imposed against
contrary to Section 337 of responsible officials for
Republic Act (RA) No. 7160. existence of cash deficits.
We also recommended
that trust fund be utilized
only for the specific
purpose for which it was
intended as required
under Section 4(3) of PD
No. 1445.
Part II, The collections made by the We recommended that The Municipal Not Reiterated in
Finding Provincial Government from the Municipal Accountant Accountant has Implemented finding No.2 of
No. 5, Real Property Taxes (RPT) due look into the difference in conducted the AAR 2018.
page 37, to the Municipality were not balances of the Real thorough analysis of
2017 recorded in full in the books Property Tax Receivables RPT Receivables and
AAR resulting in the overstatement of and Special Education set Receivables. The
RPT Receivables and Special Tax Receivables accounts proper Journal Entries
Education Tax (SET) and make the necessary has also been made.
Receivables as well as the adjustments thereon at
unequal balances of these two their correct balances. We
accounts at year-end of also recommended that
P9,984,338.07 and henceforth, the
49
P9,228,740.50, respectively. Accountant shall ensure
that both accounts carry
the same balances from
the beginning of the year
until year end.
Part II, The Municipality has expended We recommended the The functions of Fully
Finding a total of P5,685,000.00 for Honorable Mayor to direct consultants have been Implemented
No. 6, Consultancy Services for twenty- the HRMO and other scrutinized and
page 40, two (22) consultants whose work concerned officials to checked whether it only
2017 descriptions did not require immediately review the duplicates the duties of
AAR highly specialized or technical job description of each some permanent
expertise that could not be permanent employee and employees. The
provided by its existing regular assess if there is really a number of hired
staff, contrary to the provisions need to hire the services consultants have been
of Revised Implementing Rules of consultants. The reduced since July
and Regulations (IRR) of Municipality should 2018. The municipality
Republic Act No. 9184 and maximize the worth of its lacks the needed
Section 1(a) of CSC Resolution in-house employees manpower that would
No. 021480 as circularized before resorting to hiring require highly technical
under Memorandum Circular No. of consultants. and professional
24 s 2002 for Consultancy Consultants should only expertise. There are
Services. be hired for special not enough permanent
projects requiring highly employees to do so.
technical and professional Creation of additional
expertise as provided by position would be
IRR of Republic Act No. impossible.
9184 and Section 1(a) of
CSC Resolution No.
021480 as circularized
under Memorandum
Circular No. 24 s 2002 for
Consultancy Services.
50
Part II, The year-end balance of We recommended that The donations account Fully
Finding Donations Account amounting to the Municipal Mayor has been thoroughly Implemented
No. 7, P31,831,937.75 included instruct the Municipal analyzed and it was
page 43, expenses which did not partake Accountant to properly observed that the
2017 the nature of aids/assistance to record and classify problem lies on the
AAR other levels of government, financial transactions in classification of
individuals or institutions by as accordance with COA accounts. For CY
much as P13,367,287.16 or Circular No. 2015-009 to 2018, proper
41.88% thereof contrary to COA ensure that financial classification of
Circular No. 2015-009 resulting statements present fairly accounts has been
in overstatement of Donations the financial position of made. If the expense
account and understatement of the Municipality and that benefited other entities
other expense accounts. the effects of transactions or individual not directly
are faithfully represented. connected to the
municipality, then that
would be classified
under donations. If the
expense was incurred
to support operations
of the municipality,
then it was classified
under corresponding
expense account.
51
(PPAs) amounting to Officer to properly
P3,185,434.70 thus, depriving plan/screen The MPDO has been
the constituents of the optimum programs anddesignated as the focal
benefits that could have been projects before its person for all BUB
derived had those PPAs been inclusion in the
projects, as well as
implemented. priority list of PPAsprojects under the
to be undertaken by Trust Fund. She has
the Municipality to religiously monitored
avoid return of fundsthe status of each
due to due to the project by discussing it
non-implementation with the corresponding
of the planned PPA. implementing
department/office. She
is also responsible in
the monthly submission
of statement of receipts
and disbursement
prepared by the
Municipal Accountant.
Through this, both
b. BUB Focal Person department heads are Fully
to closely monitor able to update and Implemented
the implementation reconcile their records.
of the BUB projects
so that the optimum
goal of inclusive
growth and poverty
reduction could be
fully attained.
52
Part II, The 20% Development Fund We recommended that
Finding was not optimally utilized by the the Municipal Mayor direct
No. 9, Municipal Government, contrary the:
page 48, to Department of Interior and
2017 Local Government (DILG) and Municipal Engineer to The MPDO and Fully
AAR Department of Budget and ensure the full utilization Municipal Engineer has Implemented
Management (DBM) Joint of the 20% DF for its a close coordination to
Memorandum Circular No. 2011- intended projects and ensure that the PPA's
1 dated April 13, 2011thus, the be guided always by the are still implemented
intent and purpose for which the afore-cited Joint feasible. For CY 2017,
Fund was established was not Memorandum Circular. the PPA's have been
fully achieved. utilized 100% as of
December 2018.
Part II, The Municipality failed to a. We recommended The Sangguniang Partially The Municipal
Finding substantially implement the that the Sangguniang Bayan has enacted Implemented Council already
53
No. 10, requirements of Republic Act Bayan in coordination ordinances requiring submitted the
page 51, (RA) No. 9003 or Ecological with the Solid Waste waste segregation, the Municipal
2017 Solid Waste management Act of Management Board "No Segregation No Ordinance to the
AAR 2000 as manifested by poor enact ordinances to Garbage Collection Province but it
segregation of waste at source, carry out the Policy". Penalties was not yet
lack of and/or non-functional requirements of R.A. implemented has also approved.
Material Recovery Facility No. 9003, specifically been imposed. Such
(MRF), inactive SWM Board and the imposition of fines ordinances has been
absence of an ordinance and penalties to printed on tarpaulins to
imposing fines and penalties for violators to inform the public.
prohibited acts under RA 9003 strengthen the
hence, the protection of public implementation of
health and environment was not solid waste
fully achieved. management plan
throughout the
Municipality. We
likewise
recommended that
the Municipal Mayor
require strict
monitoring of
compliance with the
requirements of R.A.
No. 9003 especially
at the barangay level.
54