Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2003 To Eat or Not To Eat - How The Gut Talks T The Brain
2003 To Eat or Not To Eat - How The Gut Talks T The Brain
+
Lateral
–
Y2R hypothalamic
area
PYY
– Y1R
NPY
GHsR AgRP
Nucleus of the
POMC
(a-MSH) Arcuate solitary tract
nucleus
LEPR
INSR Insulin
Ghrelin Leptin
Pancreas
PYY
Interactions among Hormonal and Neural Pathways That Regulate Food Intake and Body-Fat Mass.
In this schematic diagram of the brain, the dashed lines indicate hormonal inhibitory effects, and the solid lines stimulatory effects. The para-
ventricular and arcuate nuclei each contain neurons that are capable of stimulating or inhibiting food intake. Y1R and Y2R denote the Y1 and
Y2 subtypes of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor, MC4R melanocortin 4 receptor, PYY peptide YY 3–36, GHsR growth hormone secretagogue
receptor, AgRP agouti-related protein, POMC proopiomelanocortin, a-MSH a-melanocyte–stimulating protein, LEPR leptin receptor, and
INSR insulin receptor.
before ingested nutrients arrive in the distal portion ascend from the gastrointestinal tract to the hind-
of the small intestine and the colon. The subsequent brain and interactions with humoral receptors in the
release of PYY is stimulated by nutrients, particular- hypothalamus. In studies in animals, PYY inhibited
ly carbohydrates and lipids, within the lumen of the the hypothalamic neuropeptide Y–expressing neu-
distal portion of the small intestine and the colon. rons and agouti-related protein–expressing neurons
PYY decreases food intake through inhibition of gut through inhibitory neuropeptide Y2 receptors,
motility (acting as an “ileal brake” to cause a sense thereby disinhibiting adjacent proopiomelanocor-
of satiety) and by way of vagal afferent neurons that tin–expressing neurons and decreasing food intake.
The study by Batterham et al. also shows that in- mans. It appears that orexigenic pathways are so
fusion of PYY decreases fasting concentrations of critical to survival that the absence of one peptide is
the orexigenic peptide ghrelin. Ghrelin is a 28-ami- compensated for by the actions of others. Studies
no-acid, acylated peptide secreted by oxyntic cells in of gut hormones after weight loss induced by diet-
the stomach fundus. Ghrelin acts on growth hor- ing or surgery have provided some clues to potential
mone secretagogue receptors to increase the release pharmacologic therapies. Weight loss by caloric re-
of growth hormone from the pituitary. Recently, the striction is associated with an increase in hunger and
putative roles of ghrelin in energy homeostasis and, circulating concentrations of ghrelin. After gastric
in particular, premeal hunger and meal initiation bypass surgery, hunger diminishes, circulating con-
have been identified. Circulating ghrelin concentra- centrations of ghrelin decrease, and circulating con-
tions increase preprandially and decrease postpran- centrations of PYY increase. Hormonal changes af-
dially. Ghrelin increases food intake through the ter bypass surgery may therefore play a part in the
stimulation of ghrelin receptors on hypothalamic suppression of hunger and the long-term mainte-
neuropeptide Y–expressing neurons and agouti- nance of reduced body weight.
related protein–expressing neurons. Although PYY Although single intraperitoneal injections of PYY
infusion reduces the concentrations of ghrelin in decrease food intake for up to seven days in rats,
lean and obese subjects who are fasting and dimin- the results of a single infusion in humans cannot be
ishes the preprandial rise in ghrelin in lean subjects, extrapolated to predict long-term outcomes. The use
the extent to which suppression of ghrelin secretion of PYY may prevent counterregulatory mechanisms
contributes to a PYY-mediated reduction in food in- from overriding the stimulation of anorexigenic
take is unclear. pathways. However, the development of antibodies
If ghrelin signals hunger and PYY signals satiety, or tachyphylaxis through receptor down-regulation
can these hormones be manipulated therapeutical- may limit the efficacy of prolonged PYY adminis-
ly? Gene-knockout studies in mice reveal that one tration. It is unlikely that any one molecule or de-
cannot easily fool the homeostatic mechanisms rivative will provide a magic bullet to induce and
that maintain body fat: experimental knockouts of maintain weight loss. Successful pharmacologic
the ghrelin gene, AgRP, and the neuropeptide Y gene treatment for obesity may be possible only by si-
(Npy) and a double knockout of AgRP and Npy are multaneously targeting the interlocking, redundant
not associated with any obvious effects on energy systems that drive food intake and act to resist the
metabolism or food intake. In contrast, inactivating loss of body fat.
mutations of POMC, the genes that encode leptin
and the leptin receptor, and MC4R produce pro- From the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia Univer-
foundly obese phenotypes in mice as well as in hu- sity, New York.
Office-Based Practice
and Opioid-Use Disorders
H. Westley Clark, M.D., J.D., M.P.H.
In the case of Webb v. United States, the U.S. Supreme a long-term basis needed to worry about whether
Court ruled that the 1914 Harrison Narcotic Drug their patients were truly in pain or whether they
Act made it illegal for physicians to prescribe nar- had become dependent on these pain medications.
cotics for the purpose of keeping a patient “com- For patients found to be dependent on an illicit opi-
fortable by maintaining his customary use.” For oid, such as heroin, physicians were forced to treat
more than 80 years, it remained illegal in the United withdrawal symptoms with nonnarcotic agents,
States for physicians to prescribe opioid medica- which provided only symptomatic relief, or to refer
tions for the treatment of opioid dependence. The patients to a regulated program.
exception was the dispensing of methadone or The Harrison Narcotic Drug Act and decisions
levomethadyl acetate through regulated programs. such as Webb v. United States essentially gave the fol-
Physicians prescribing opioids such as morphine, lowing message to physicians: “Treat an addict; go
fentanyl, codeine, hydrocodone, and oxycodone on to jail.” Physicians consequently were reluctant to