Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formative Assessment 3
This formative assessment relates to the CAPM model – refer to Handout 1 for information on
the CAPM.
Using the attached STATA output for the CAPM model for Microsoft and Exxon-Mobil, you
should answer the following questions. You can handwrite or type your answers on the
formative assessment submission page (available in the Formative Assessments folder) and
submit your answers to Canvas (via the Assignments button) by 5pm on Monday, October
4th 2021.
Please ensure that you retain a copy of your answers for discussion in the live real-time
interaction session that will take place on Tuesday, October 5th, 2021.
Microsoft
(a) Test at the 5% level of significance the null hypothesis that Microsoft’s “beta” value is 1
against the alternative that it is not equal to 1. What is the economic interpretation of a beta
equal to 1?
(b) Test at the 1% level of significance the null hypothesis that Microsoft’s “beta” value is
equal to 1 against the alternative that it is greater than 1. What is the economic
interpretation of a beta more than 1?
(c) Test at the 5% level of significance the hypothesis that the intercept term in the CAPM
model for Microsoft is zero, against the alternative that it is not. What do you conclude?
(d) Stating clearly which results you are using, test the assumption of the normality of
residuals. What do you conclude?
Exxon-Mobil
(e) Evaluate by testing the appropriate hypothesis, the individual significance of the
independent (explanatory) variable.
(f) Test at the 5% level of significance the null hypothesis that Exxonmobil’s “beta” value is
equal to 1 against the alternative that it is less than 1. What is the economic interpretation
of a beta less than 1?
(g) Test at the 5% level of significance the hypothesis that the intercept term in the CAPM
model for Exxon-Mobil is zero, against the alternative that it is not. What do you conclude?
(h) Stating clearly which results you are using, test the assumption of the normality of
residuals. What do you conclude?
1
EC4215 Autumn 2021
Plot of fitted regression and actual values for Microsoft CAPM model
. twoway (scatter Microriskprem Marketriskprem) (lfit Microriskprem Marketriskprem)
.4
.2
0
-.2
-.4
-.2 -.1 0 .1
Marketriskprem
2
EC4215 Autumn 2021
0
-.2
-.4
2
0
-.4 -.2 0 .2 .4
Residuals
3
EC4215 Autumn 2021
Residuals
Percentiles Smallest
1% -.2697919 -.2754083
5% -.1344346 -.2697919
10% -.0795064 -.1622906 Obs 132
25% -.052734 -.1412734 Sum of Wgt. 132
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Exomriskprem | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
--------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Marketriskp~m | .413969 .0897132
_cons | .0078801 .0043223
--------------------------------------------------------------------
4
EC4215 Autumn 2021
Plot of fitted regression and actual values for Exxon-Mobil CAPM model
. twoway (scatter Exomriskprem Marketriskprem) (lfit Exomriskprem Marketriskprem)
.3
.2
.1
0
-.1
-.2 -.1 0 .1
Marketriskprem
0
-.1
5
EC4215 Autumn 2021
4
2
0
-.1 0 .1 .2
Residuals
Residuals
Percentiles Smallest
1% -.1157319 -.1175432
5% -.0716882 -.1157319
10% -.0607106 -.0905804 Obs 132
25% -.0302743 -.0897743 Sum of Wgt. 132