You are on page 1of 72

“How Well Am I Doing?


Financial Statement
Analysis

Lesson Nine

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-2

Limitations of Financial Statement Analysis

Differences in accounting methods between


companies sometimes make comparisons
difficult.

We use the LIFO method to We use the average cost


value inventory. method to value inventory.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-3

Limitations of Financial Statement Analysis

Changes within
the company
Industry Consumer
trends tastes

Technological
changes
Economic
factors

Analysts should look beyond


the ratios.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
16-4

Learning Objective 1

Prepare and interpret


financial statements in
comparative and
common-size form.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-5
Statements in Comparative and
Common-Size Form

❶ Dollar and percentage


changes on statements

An item on a financial
statement has little ❷ Common-size
meaning by itself. The statements
meaning of the numbers
can be enhanced by
drawing comparisons.
❸ Ratios

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-6
Dollar and Percentage Changes on
Statements

Horizontal analysis (or trend analysis) shows


the changes between years in the financial
data in both dollar and percentage form.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-7

Horizontal Analysis

Example

The following slides illustrate a horizontal


analysis of Clover Corporation’s
December 31, 2007 and 2006, comparative
balance sheets and comparative
income statements.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-8

Horizontal Analysis

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-9

Horizontal Analysis

Calculating Change in Dollar Amounts

Dollar Current Year Base Year


= –
Change Figure Figure

The dollar
amounts for
2006 become
the “base” year
figures.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-10

Horizontal Analysis

Calculating Change as a Percentage

Percentage Dollar Change


Change
=
Base Year Figure × 100

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-11

Horizontal Analysis

$12,000 – $23,500 = $(11,500)

($11,500 ÷ $23,500) × 100 = 48.9%

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-12

Horizontal Analysis

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-13

Horizontal Analysis

We could do this for the liabilities


& stockholders’ equity, but now
let’s look at the income statement
accounts.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-14

Horizontal Analysis

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-15

Horizontal Analysis

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-16

Horizontal Analysis

Sales increased by 8.3%, yet


net income decreased by 21.9%.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-17

Horizontal Analysis

There were increases in both cost of goods


sold (14.3%) and operating expenses (2.1%).
These increased costs more than offset the
increase in sales, yielding an overall
decrease in net income.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-18

Trend Percentages

Trend percentages
state several years’
financial data in terms
of a base year, which
equals 100 percent.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-19

Trend Analysis

Trend = Current Year Amount


Percentage Base Year Amount
× 100%

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-20

Trend Analysis

Example

Look at the income information for Berry


Products for the years 2003 through 2007.
We will do a trend analysis on these
amounts to see what we can learn
about the company.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-21

Trend Analysis

Berry Products
Income Information
For the Years Ended December 31

The base
year is 2003, and its amounts
will equal 100%.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-22

Trend Analysis

Berry Products
Income Information
For the Years Ended December 31

2004 Amount ÷ 2003 Amount × 100%


( $290,000 ÷ $275,000 ) × 100% = 105%
( $198,000 ÷ $190,000 ) × 100% = 104%
( $ 92,000 ÷ $ 85,000 ) × 100% = 108%
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
16-23

Trend Analysis

Berry Products
Income Information
For the Years Ended December 31

By analyzing the trends for Berry Products, we


can see that cost of goods sold is increasing
faster than sales, which is slowing the increase
in gross margin.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-24

Trend Analysis

We can use the trend


percentages to construct a
graph so we can see the
trend over time.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-25

Common-Size Statements

Vertical analysis focuses


on the relationships
among financial statement
items at a given point in
time. A common-size
financial statement is a
vertical analysis in which
each financial statement
item is expressed as a
percentage.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
16-26

Common-Size Statements

In income
statements, all
items usually are
expressed as a
percentage of
sales.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-27

Gross Margin Percentage

Gross Margin = Gross Margin


Percentage Sales

This measure indicates how much


of each sales dollar is left after
deducting the cost of goods sold to
cover expenses and provide a profit.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-28

Common-Size Statements

In balance
sheets, all items
usually are
expressed as a
percentage of
total assets.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-29

Common-Size Statements

Common-size financial statements are


particularly useful when comparing
data from different companies.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-30

Common-Size Statements

Example

Let’s take another look at the information


from the comparative income statements
of Clover Corporation for 2007 and 2006.
This time, let’s prepare common-size
statements.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-31

Common-Size Statements

Sales is
usually the
base and is
expressed
as 100%.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-32

Common-Size Statements

2007 Cost ÷ 2007 Sales × 100%


( $360,000 ÷ $520,000 ) × 100% = 69.2%

2006 Cost ÷ 2006 Sales × 100%


( $315,000 ÷ $480,000 ) × 100% = 65.6%

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-33

Common-Size Statements

What conclusions can we draw?

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-34

Quick Check ✔

Which of the following statements


describes horizontal analysis?
a. A statement that shows items appearing
on it in percentage and dollar form.
b. A side-by-side comparison of two or
more years’ financial statements.
c. A comparison of the account balances on
the current year’s financial statements.
d. None of the above.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-35

Quick Check ✔

Which of the following statements


describes horizontal analysis?
a. A statement that shows items appearing
on it in percentage and dollar form.
b. A side-by-side comparison of two or
more years’ financial statements.
c. A comparison of the account balances on
Horizontal
the current analysis shows the
year’s financial changes
statements.
d.between
None ofyears in the financial data in both
the above.
dollar and percentage form.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-36

Now, let’s look at


Norton
Corporation’s
2007 and 2006
financial
statements.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-37

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-38

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-39

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-40

Learning Objective 2

Compute and interpret


financial ratios that would
be useful to a common
stockholder.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-41

Ratio Analysis – The Common Stockholder

The ratios that


are of the most
interest to
stockholders
include those
ratios that focus
on net income,
dividends, and
stockholders’
equities.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-42

Earnings Per Share

Net Income – Preferred Dividends


Earnings per Share =
Average Number of Common
Shares Outstanding

Whenever a ratio divides an income statement


balance by a balance sheet balance, the average
for the year is used in the denominator.

Earnings form the basis for dividend payments


and future increases in the value of shares of
stock.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-43

Earnings Per Share

Net Income – Preferred Dividends


Earnings per Share =
Average Number of Common
Shares Outstanding

Earnings per Share = $53,690 – $0 = $2.42


(17,000 + 27,400)/2

This measure indicates how much


income was earned for each share of
common stock outstanding.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-44

Price-Earnings Ratio

Price-Earnings Market Price Per Share


=
Ratio Earnings Per Share

Price-Earnings $20.00
= = 8.26 times
Ratio $2.42

A higher price-earnings ratio means that


investors are willing to pay a premium
for a company’s stock because of
optimistic future growth prospects.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-45

Dividend Payout Ratio

Dividend Dividends Per Share


=
Payout Ratio Earnings Per Share

Dividend $2.00
= = 82.6%
Payout Ratio $2.42

This ratio gauges the portion of current


earnings being paid out in dividends. Investors
seeking dividends (market price growth) would
like this ratio to be large (small).

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-46

Dividend Yield Ratio

Dividend Dividends Per Share


=
Yield Ratio Market Price Per Share

Dividend $2.00
= = 10.00%
Yield Ratio $20.00

This ratio identifies the return, in terms


of cash dividends, on the current
market price of the stock.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-47

Return on Total Assets

Return on Net Income + [Interest Expense × (1 – Tax Rate)]


=
Total Assets Average Total Assets

Return on $53,690 + [$7,300 × (1 – .30)]


= = 18.19%
Total Assets ($300,000 + $346,390) ÷ 2

Adding interest expense back to net income


enables the return on assets to be compared
for companies with different amounts of debt
or over time for a single company that has
changed its mix of debt and equity.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-48

Return on Common Stockholders’ Equity

Return on Common = Net Income – Preferred Dividends


Stockholders’ Equity Average Stockholders’ Equity

Return on Common = $53,690 – $0 = 25.91%


Stockholders’ Equity ($180,000 + $234,390) ÷ 2

This measure indicates how well the


company used the owners’
investments to earn income.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-49

Financial Leverage

Financial leverage results from the difference


between the rate of return the company earns on
investments in its own assets and the rate of return
that the company must pay its creditors.
Fixed rate of
Return on return on Positive
investment in > borrowed = financial
assets funds leverage

Return on Fixed rate of Negative


investment in < return on = financial
assets borrowed leverage
funds
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
16-50

Quick Check ✔

Which of the following statements is true?


a. Negative financial leverage is when the
fixed return to a company’s creditors and
preferred stockholders is greater than the
return on total assets.
b. Positive financial leverage is when the
fixed return to a company’s creditors and
preferred stockholders is greater than the
return on total assets.
c. Financial leverage is the expression of
several years’ financial data in
percentage form in terms of a base year.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
16-51

Quick Check ✔

Which of the following statements is true?


a. Negative financial leverage is when the
fixed return to a company’s creditors and
preferred stockholders is greater than the
return on total assets.
b. Positive financial leverage is when the
fixed return to a company’s creditors and
preferred stockholders is greater than the
return on total assets.
c. Financial leverage is the expression of
several years’ financial data in
percentage form in terms of a base year.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
16-52

Book Value Per Share

Book Value Common Stockholders’ Equity


=
per Share Number of Common Shares Outstanding

Book Value $234,390


= = $ 8.55
per Share 27,400

This ratio measures the amount that would be


distributed to holders of each share of common
stock if all assets were sold at their balance sheet
carrying amounts after all creditors were paid off.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-53

Book Value Per Share

Book Value Common Stockholders’ Equity


=
per Share Number of Common Shares Outstanding

Book Value $234,390


= = $ 8.55
per Share 27,400

Notice that the book value per share of $8.55 does


not equal the market value per share of $20. This
is because the market price reflects expectations
about future earnings and dividends, whereas the
book value per share is based on historical cost.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-54

Learning Objective 3

Compute and interpret


financial ratios that would
be useful to a short-term
creditor.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-55

Ratio Analysis – The Short–Term Creditor

Short-term
creditors, such as
suppliers, want to
be paid on time.
Therefore, they
focus on the
company’s cash
flows and working
capital.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-56

Working Capital

The excess of current assets over


current liabilities is known as
working capital.

Working capital is not


free. It must be
financed with long-term
debt and equity.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-57

Working Capital

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-58

Current Ratio

Current Current Assets


=
Ratio Current Liabilities

The current ratio measures a


company’s short-term debt paying
ability.

A declining ratio may be a


sign of deteriorating
financial condition, or it
might result from eliminating
obsolete inventories.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-59

Current Ratio

Current Current Assets


=
Ratio Current Liabilities

Current $65,000
= = 1.55
Ratio $42,000

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-60

Acid-Test (Quick) Ratio

Acid-Test Quick Assets


=
Ratio Current Liabilities

Acid-Test $50,000
= = 1.19
Ratio $42,000

Quick assets include Cash,


Marketable Securities, Accounts Receivable and
current Notes Receivable.
This ratio measures a company’s ability to meet
obligations without having to liquidate inventory.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-61

Accounts Receivable Turnover

Accounts
Sales on Account
Receivable =
Average Accounts Receivable
Turnover

Accounts
$494,000
Receivable = = 26.7 times
($17,000 + $20,000) ÷ 2
Turnover

This ratio measures how many


times a company converts its
receivables into cash each year.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-62

Average Collection Period

Average 365 Days


Collection = Accounts Receivable Turnover
Period

Average
365 Days
Collection = = 13.67 days
26.7 Times
Period

This ratio measures, on average,


how many days it takes to collect
an account receivable.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-63

Inventory Turnover

Inventory Cost of Goods Sold


Turnover = Average Inventory

This ratio measures how many times a


company’s inventory has been sold and
replaced during the year.

If a company’s inventory
turnover Is less than its
industry average, it either
has excessive inventory or
the wrong types of inventory.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-64

Inventory Turnover

Inventory Cost of Goods Sold


=
Turnover Average Inventory

Inventory $140,000
= = 12.73 times
Turnover ($10,000 + $12,000) ÷ 2

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-65

Average Sale Period

Average 365 Days


=
Sale Period Inventory Turnover

Average 365 Days


= = 28.67 days
Sale Period 12.73 Times

This ratio measures how many


days, on average, it takes to sell
the inventory.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-66

Learning Objective 4

Compute and interpret


financial ratios that would
be useful to a long-term
creditor.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-67

Ratio Analysis – The Long–Term Creditor

Long-term creditors are concerned with


a company’s ability to repay its loans
over the long-run.

This is also referred


to as net operating
income.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-68

Times Interest Earned Ratio

Earnings before Interest Expense


Times and Income Taxes
Interest = Interest Expense
Earned

Times
$84,000
Interest = = 11.51 times
$7,300
Earned
This is the most common
measure of a company’s ability
to provide protection for its
long-term creditors. A ratio of
less than 1.0 is inadequate.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-69

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

Debt–to–
Total Liabilities
Equity =
Stockholders’ Equity
Ratio

This ratio indicates the relative proportions


of debt to equity on a company’s balance
sheet.

Stockholders like a lot of Creditors prefer less debt


debt if the company can and more equity because
take advantage of positive equity represents a buffer
financial leverage. of protection.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-70

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

Debt–to–
Total Liabilities
Equity =
Stockholders’ Equity
Ratio

Debt–to–
$112,000
Equity = = 0.48
$234,390
Ratio

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-71
Published Sources That Provide
Comparative Ratio Data

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


16-72

End of Chapter 16

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

You might also like