Laguna Lake Development Authority vs.

Court of Appeals
G.R. No. 110120
March 16, 1994

FACTS: This case was concerned with garbage being disposed by the City Government of
Caloocan in the Tala Estate. The complainants sought to end the operations of the dumpsite as they
were concerned with the environmental and health impacts. An investigation found that the City
Government of Caloocan was operating the dumpsite without the required Environmental
Compliance Certificate. The Lake Laguna Development Authority (LLDA) issued an order to the
City Government asking them to stop operating the dumpsite. Activities at the site ceased for a
few months, but resumed again after that. Another cease and desist order was filed. The City
Government then filed a petition seeking a declaration that they have sole authority over promoting
the health and safety of the Caloocan residents in light of a balanced ecology of the region in which
case all orders issued asking them to stop operations of the dumpsite would be void. The lower
court allowed this petition declaring the City Government of Caloocan to have sole authority over
these matters and ruling that the LLDA did not have the power to issue a cease and desist order.

ISSUE: Whether or not LLDA has the power to issue a cease and desist order.

RULING: Yes, the LLDA had the authority to issue a cease and desist order concerning the
operations of the dumpsite seeing as Republic Act. No 4850 explicitly authorized them to make
such orders where it serves the aim of stopping pollution. Furthermore, the Court pointed out
Article II, section 16 of the Constitution which grants the right to a healthy environment, as well
as state policy which declared to promote the right to health which is also enshrined in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the Declaration of Alma-Ata as a fundamental right.
Hence, the Supreme Court allowed the LLDA’s appeal and overruled this decision.