• Written in the syntax of a user story “As a [user] I can [do something] to [achieve some benefit]. This is probably the “epic” on your product backlog. • Benefits • A list of the specific benefits to be achieved via the implementation of the feature. The goal is to answer the question of “why bother.” • Scenarios • This particular feature supports a few different business process scenarios. To make sure we don’t overlook one, list them here. Capturing the scenarios keeps the requirements process aligned with how people will actually be using the new software. • Features list • A set of about 5-7 statements to capture the essence of the feature in more detail. This is the meat of the “scope” of the epic. These can be written in the user story syntax as well and might logically become the product backlog items or be broken up into multiple user stories. • Existing functionality to integrate • Are we building this feature on top of some existing functionality? Overlooking the current capabilities the software needs to continue to fulfill is a common requirements oversight we want to avoid. • Assumptions • A list of things assumed to be true that were validated (or invalidated in some cases) by the business stakeholders. • Nice to have features • More of the above, but these will result in lower priority or non-existent product backlog items. • Out of scope • What are we not doing? Included to keep us on track of delivering what we absolutely need to create value. Out-of-scope items were features discussed but determined they just wouldn’t deliver adequate benefits to be included in the scope of this epic. Without this section, otherwise out-of-scope items might creep into your product backlog and divert your team’s focus from delivering on the value proposition.