Professional Documents
Culture Documents
■ 825.21 Diameter
Next Page
(Footnote 1: One light year is six trillion miles, and humans see Andromeda with
the naked eye one million light years away, which means six quintillion miles.)
801.10 Sense Coordination of the Infant
801.11 One of the most surprising things about a newborn child is that it is
already tactilely coordinated. Even in the first day, the baby is so well coordinated
tactilely that if you put your finger against its palm, the baby will close its hand
firmly and deftly around your finger, although it is not using its ears or eyes at all.
If you will now exert a tiny bit of tension effort to remove your finger, the child
will respond at once by opening its hand. The infant will repeat the closing and
opening response to your initiatives as many times as you may wish to initiate.
This should not surprise us if we realize that the baby has been in tactile
communication with its mother for months before evacuating her womb, within
which, however, its visual, olfactory, and aural faculties were muted and
inoperative. Not much time after birth the child employs for the first time its
olfactory glands and starts searching the mother's breast and the source of milk.
Quite a few days later it begins to hear; and very much later, it sees. The sequence
in which the child's faculties become employed corresponds to the order of
increased range of its respective faculties of information apprehending.
801.12 Thus we find the child successively coordinating the first three faculties:
the tactile, the olfactory, and the aural. He begins to learn how they work together
and quite rapidly gets to be very skillful in coordinating and handling the
information coming to him through these senses. It is only days later that he
begins to use his sight. He tries tactilely, olfactorily, and aurally to confirm what
he sees to be reality. He cannot do so over any great distance because neither his
arms and hands nor his tasting mouth will reach very far. Months later, the child
crawls to check tactilely, olfactorily, and aurally on phenomena still further away;
and thereby to coordinatingly sort out his information inputs; and thereby develop
a scheme of__and a total sense of__reality and repetitive event expectancy. He
crawls over to the chair to find that his eyes have reported to him correctly that the
chair is indeed there. He begins to check up and coordinate on more distant
objects, and he finds his visual ability to be reliable. The child seeing the Fourth
of July fireworks for the first time sees a flash and then hears a boom. Maybe that
doesn't mean so much to him, because boom (aural) and flash (optical) may be
different phenomena; but when he sees a man hammering a fence post, he has by
this time been hammering a whole lot and he knows the sound that makes. He
may not be very sure of the fireworks in the sky, the flash and the boom, but he is
really very confident about the sound of the hammering of the fence post. When
he sees the man hammer and then hears the sound a fraction later, he begins to
realize that there is some lag in the rates in which he gets information from
different faculties. His eye gets it faster than his ear.
801.13 The three postnatal senses the child coordinates are secondary. The first
prenatal one, the tactile, is primary. The real emphasis of the judgment of life is
on the tactile, the primary, the thing you can touch.2 The ranges of the first three
senses are so close together, and sight is so different, that we may best rank them
as #1, touch, being a primary set; with both #2, olfactoral coupled with #3, aural,
as a secondary set; and #4 sight, as a tertiary set: wherefore in effect, touch is the
yesterday set; while the olfactoral and aural (what you are smelling, eating,
saying, and hearing) are the now set; while sight (what only may be next) is the
future set. (We can seem to see, but we have not yet come to it.) Whereas reality
is eternally now, human apprehending demonstrates a large assortment of lags in
rates of cognitions whose myriadly multivaried frequencies of myriadly
multivaried, positive-negative, omnidirectional aberrations, in multivaried
degrees, produce such elusively off-center effects as possibly to result in an
illusionary awareness of an approximately unlimited number of individually
different awareness patterns, all of whose relative imperfections induce the
illusion of a reality in which "life" is terminal, because physically imperfect; as
contrasted to mind's discovery of an omni- interaccommodative complex of a
variety of different a priori, cosmic, and eternal principles, which can only be
intellectually discovered, have no weight, and apparently manifest a perfect,
abstract, eternal design, the metaphysical utterly transcendent of the physical.
(Footnote 2: You can reflect philosophically on some of the things touch does,
like making people want to get their hands on the coin, the key, or whatever it
may be.)
801.14 The 186,000-miles-per-second speed of light is so fast that it was only
just recently measured, and it doesn't really have much meaning to us. You don't
have a sense of 700 million miles per hour. If you did get to "see" that way, you
would be spontaneously conscious of seeing the Sun eight minutes after the
horizon had obscured it; ergo, consciously seeing an arc around the Earth's
curvature. We are not seeing that way as yet. To explain our sight, we call it
"instantaneous." We say we can see instantaneously. This fact has misled us very
greatly. You insist that you are seeing the black-and-white page of this book, do
you not? You're not. You have a brain-centered television set, and the light is
bouncing off the page. The resultant comes back through your optical system and
is scanned and actually goes back into the brain, and you are seeing the page in
your brain. You are not seeing the page out in front of you. We have gotten used
to the idea that we see outside of ourselves, but we just don't do so. It only takes
about a billionth of a second for the light to bounce off the page and get in the
brain to be scanned, so the child is fooled into thinking that he is seeing outside of
himself. And we are misinforming ourselves in discounting the lag and assuming
that we see it "over there." No one has ever seen outside themselves.
801.20 The Omnidirectional TV Set
801.21 Children looking at TV today look at it quite differently from the way it
was to the first generation of TV adults. It begins to be very much a part of the
child's life, and he tends to accredit it the way adults accredit what they get from
their eyes. When children are looking at a baseball game, they are right there in
the field. All of our vision operates as an omnidirectional TV set, and there is no
way to escape it. That is all we have ever lived in. We have all been in
omnidirectional TV sets all our lives, and we have gotten so accustomed to the
reliability of the information that we have, in effect, projected ourselves into the
field. We may insist that we see each other out in the field. But all vision actually
operates inside the brain in organic, neuron-transistored TV sets.
801.22 We have all heard people describe other people, in a derogatory way, as
being "full of imagination." The fact is that if you are not full of imagination, you
are not very sane. All we do is deal in brain images. We traffic in the memory
sets, the TV sets, the recall sets, and certain incoming sets. When you say that you
see me or you say "I see you," or "I touch you," I am confining information about
you to the "tactile you." If I had never had a tactile experience (which could easily
be if I were paralyzed at conception), "you" might be only where I smell you.
"You" would have only the smellable identity that we have for our dogs. You
would be as big as you smell. Then, if I had never smelled, tasted, nor
experienced tactile sensing, you would be strictly the hearable you.
801.23 What is really important, however, about you or me is the thinkable you
or the thinkable me, the abstract metaphysical you or me, what we have done with
these images, the relatedness we have found, what communications we have made
with one another. We begin to realize that the dimensions of the thinkable you are
phenomenal, when you hear Mozart on the radio, that is, the metaphysical__only
intellectually identifiable__eternal Mozart who will always be there to any who
hears his music. When we say "atom" or think "atom" we are intellect-to-intellect
with livingly thinkable Democritus, who first conceived and named the invisible
phenomenon "atom." Were exclusively tactile Democritus to be sitting next to
you, surely you would not recognize him nor accredit him as you do the only-
thinkable Democritus and what he thought about the atom. You say to me: "I see
you sitting there." And all you see is a little of my pink face and hands and my
shoes and clothing, and you can't see me, which is entirely the thinking, abstract,
metaphysical me. It becomes shocking to think that we recognize one another
only as the touchable, nonthinking biological organism and its clothed ensemble.
801.24 Reconsidered in these significant identification terms, there is quite a
different significance in what we term "dead" as a strictly tactile "thing," in
contrast to the exclusively "thinking" you or me. We can put the touchable things
in the ground, but we can't put the thinking and thinkable you in the ground. The
fact that I see you only as the touchable you keeps shocking me. The baby's
spontaneous touching becomes the dominant sense measure, wherefore we insist
on measuring the inches or the feet. We talk this way even though these are not
the right increments. My exclusively tactile seeing inadequacy becomes a kind of
warning, despite my only theoretical knowledge of the error of seeing you only as
the touchable you. I keep spontaneously seeing the tactile living you. The tactile is
very unreliable; it has little meaning. Though you know they are gentle, sweet
children, when they put on Hallowe'en monster masks they "look" like monsters.
It was precisely in this manner that human beings came to err in identifying life
only with the touchable physical, which is exactly what life isn't. (See Sec. 531.)
821.01 The Early Greek geometers and their Egyptian and Babylonian
predecessors pursued the science of geometry with three basic tools; the dividers,
the straightedge, and the scriber. They established the first rule of the game of
geometry, that they could not introduce information into their exploration unless it
was acquired empirically as constructed by the use of those tools. With the
progressive interactive use of these three tools, they produced modular areas,
angles, and linear spaces.
821.02 The basic flaw in their game was that they failed to identify and define as
a tool the surface on which they inscribed. In absolute reality, this surface
constituted a fourth tool absolutely essential to their demonstration. The absolute
error of this oversight was missed at the time due to the minuscule size of man in
relation to his planet Earth. While there were a few who conceived of Earth as a
sphere, they assumed that a local planar condition existed__which the vast
majority of humans assumed to be extended to infinity, with a four-cornered Earth
plane surrounded by the plane of water that went to infinity.
821.03 They assumed the complementary tool to be a plane. Because the plane
went to infinity in all planar directions, it could not be defined and therefore was
spontaneously overlooked as a tool essential to their empirical demonstrating.
What they could not define, yet obviously needed, they identified by the ineffable
title "axiomatic," meaning "Everybody knows that." Had they recognized the
essentiality of defining the fourth tool upon which they inscribed, and had they
recognized that our Earth was spherical__ergo, finite; ergo, definite__they could
and probably would have employed strategies completely different from that of
their initiation of geometry with the exclusive use of the plane. But to the eastern
Mediterranean world there lay the flat, infinite plane of the Earth at their feet on
which to scratch with a scriber.
821.10 Dividers: The ends of two sticks can be bound together to serve as
dividers. A straightedge stick could be whittled by a knife and sighted for
straightness and improved by more whittling.
821.11 The opening of the dividers could be fixed by binding on a third stick
between the other two ends, thus rigidifying by triangulation. Almost anyone at
sea or in the desert could start playing this game.
825.00 Greek Scribing of Right-Angle Modularity in a Plane
825.01 It was easy for the Greeks to use their fixed dividers to identify two
points on the plane marked by the divider's two ends: A and B, respectively.
Employing their straightedge, they could inscribe the line between these two
Fig. 825.01 points, the line AB. Using one end of the dividers as the pivot point at one end of
the line, A, a circle can be described around the original line terminal: circle A.
Using point B as a center, a circle can be described around it, which we will call
circle B. These two circles intersect one another at two points on either side of the
line AB. We will call the intersection points C and C'.
825.02 By construction, they demonstrated that points C and C' were both
equidistant from points A and B. In this process, they have also defined two
equilateral triangles ABC and ABC', with a congruent edge along the line AB and
with points C and C` equidistant on either side from points A and B, respectively.
825.10 Right Triangle
825.11 They then used a straightedge to connect points C and C' with a line that
they said bisected line AB perpendicularly, being generated by equidistance from
either point on either side. Thus the Greeks arrived at their right triangle; in fact,
their four right triangles. We will designate as point D the intersection of the lines
CC' and AB. This gave the Greeks four angles around a common point. The four
right triangles ADC, BDC, ADC', and BDC' have hypotenuses and legs that are,
as is apparent from even the most casual inspection, of three different lengths. The
leg DB, for instance, is by equidistance construction exactly one-half of AB, since
AB was the radius of the two original circles whose circumferences ran through
one another's centers. By divider inspections, DB is less than CD and CD is less
than CB. The length of the line CD is unknown in respect to the original lines AB,
BD, or AC, lines that represented the original opening of the dividers. They have
established, however, with satisfaction of the rules of their game, that 360 degrees
of circular unity at D could be divided into four equal 90-degree angles entirely
and evenly surrounding point D.
825.20 Hexagonal Construction
Fig. 825.01.
(Footnote 4: With the blackboard the pedagogues were able to bring infinity
indoors.)
826.10 Otherness Restraints and Elliptical Orbits
826.11 Angular acceleration is radically restrained accumulation of circular
momentum; angular deceleration is the local depletion of angular momentum.
826.12 Release from angular acceleration appears to be linear acceleration, but
the linearity is only theoretical. Linear acceleration is the release from the restraint
of the nearest accelerator to the angularly accelerative or decelerative restraint of
the integrated vectorial resultant of all the neighboringly dominant, forever-
otherness restraints in Universe. Linear acceleration never occurs, because there is
no cosmic exemption of otherness.
826.13 The hammer thrower releases his "hammer's" ball-and-rod assembly
from his extended arm's-end grasp, seemingly allowing the hammer to take a
tangentially linear trajectory, but Earth's gravitational pull immediately takes over
and converts the quasistraight trajectory into an elliptical arc of greater orbiting
radius than before. But the arc is one of ever-decreasing radius as the Earth's
gravity takes over and the hammer thrower's steel ball seemingly comes to rest on
the Earth's surface, which is, however, in reality traveling around the Earth's axis
in synchronized consonance with the other huddled together atoms of the Earth's
surface. Near the Earth's equator this would be at a circular velocity of
approximately 1000 miles an hour, but near the Earth's poles the velocity would
be only inches per hour around the Earth's axis. Both Earth, hammer thrower, and
thrown hammer are traveling at 60,000 miles an hour around the Sun at a radial
restraint distance of approximately 92 million miles, with the galaxies of
Universe's other nonsimultaneously generated restraints of all the othernesses'
overlappingly effective dominance variations, as produced by degrees of
neighboring energy concentrations and dispersions. It is the pulsation of such
concentrations and dispersions that brings about the elliptical orbiting.
826.14 This is fundamental complementarity as intuited in Einstein's curved
space prior to the scientific establishment of generalized complementarity, which
we may now also speak of as the "generalized otherness" of Universe. This is why
there can be only curved space. (See Sec. 1009.52.)
826.15 Isaac Newton's first law of motion, "A body persists in a state of rest or
in a straight line except as affected by other forces," should now be restated to
say, "Any one considered body persists in any one elliptical orbit until that orbit is
altered to another elliptical orbit by the ceaselessly varying interpositionings and
integrated restraint effects imposed upon the considered body by the ever-
transforming generalized cosmic otherness." A body is always responding
orbitally to a varying plurality of otherness forces.
Fig. 831.31
835.01 With one of the sharp points (A) of dividers (AB) fixed at a point (X) on
a flat sheet of paper, sharp point B is rotated cuttingly around until an equiradius
circle of paper is cut out. It is discovered experimentally that if any point on the
circular perimeter is folded over to any other point on the circle's perimeter, that
the circle of paper always folds in such a manner that one-half of its
perimeter__and one-half of its area__is always congruent with the other half; and
that the folded edge always runs through the exact center point X of the circle and
constitutes a diameter line of the circle. This demonstrates that a diameter line
always divides both the whole circular area and the circle's perimeter-
circumference into two equal halves. If one diameter's end comer W of the circle,
folded into halves, is folded over once more to congruence with the corner W' at
the other end of the diameter, once again it will be constructively proved that all
of the circle's perimeter is congruent with itself in four folded-together layers,
which operational constructing also divides the whole circle into four equal parts,
with the second folded diameter Y-Y' perpendicular to the first diameter, ergo
producing four right-angled comers at the center of the circle as marked by the
two diameter fold lines, W-W' and Y-Y'. If we now open the paper circle and turn
it over to its reverse side, we fold in a third diameter line T-T' by making
circumference point W congruent with circumference point Y (which
inadvertently makes point W' congruent with Y'), we will find that we have
exactly halved the right angles WXY and W'XY', so that the perimeter distances
WT or TY are each exactly half the perimeter distance WY, and either W'T' or
T'Y' are each one-half the perimeter distances of either WY, YW', W'Y', or Y'W.
835.02 If we now turn the paper circle over once more we find that the spring in
the fold lines of the paper will make point T and T' approach each other so that
Fig. 835.02 the whole circle once again may be folded flat to produce four congruent surfaces
of the paper folded into an overall composite quarter circle with the two quarter-
circle outer layers, and four one-eighth circle's two inner layers coming to
congruent fold-around terminal tangency at the midpoint and center of the folded,
right-angle, quarter-circle packet, with W congruent with Y and W' congruent
with Y' and T congruent with T'. Thus it is proven that with three diameter
foldlines the whole circle can be subdividingly folded into six arc- and-central-
angle increments, ergo also unfoldable again into whole-circle flatness. (See Illus.
835.02.)
835.03 We know that every point on the perimeter of the folded semicircle is
equidistant from the point of origin. We may now go to one end of the folded-
edge diameter and fold the paper in such a manner that two ends of the diameter
are congruent. This will fold the paper circle into four quadrants which, by
construction congruence, are exactly equal. The legs of the 90 degree angle
formed around the origin of the circle by this second folding are the same in
length, being the same radius as that of the circle, ergo, of the halved diameter
produced by the second folding. The angle edges and the radii are identical. When
we open the quarter-circle of four faces folded together into the semicircle, we
find that the second fold edge, which produced the 90-degree angle, is the radius
of the diameter perpendicular to the first diameter folded upon. The points where
this perpendicular diameter's ends intersect the circumference of the circle are
equidistant, by construction, from the diameter ends of the first folded-edge
diameter of the semicircle. This folded semicircle, with its secondary fold-mark of
verticality to its origin, can be partially folded again on that perpendicular radius
so that the partially folded semicircle and its partially folded, vertically impinging
fold-line constitute an angularly winged unit, with appearance similar to the outer
hard covers of a partially opened book standing bottomless with the book's hard
covers vertically perpendicular to a table. This flying- winged, vertically hinged
pair of double-thickness quarter-circles will be found to be vertically stable when
stood upon a table, that is, allowed to be pulled vertically against the table by
gravity. In structural effect, this winged quarter-pair of open, standing "book
covers" is a tripod because the two diameter ends, A and B, and the circle's origin
point, C, at the middle represent three points, A, B, C, in triangular array touching
the table, which act as a triangle base for the tripod whose apex is at the perimeter,
T, of the semicircle at the top terminal of the vertical fold. The tripod's legs are
uneven, one being the vertical radius of the original circle, TC, and the other two
Fig. 835.02.
Fig. 835.11
835.12 As we rotate this octahedron rapidly on any one of its three axes, the
rotated perimeters generate optically what can be called a dynamically generated
true sphere. By construction, every point on the sphere's dynamically high-
frequency event-occurring is equidistant from the central origin__our initial
scribing position of one end of the dividers whose central angle we locked by
welding it into unalterability.
836.00 Spherical Octahedron: Alternate Assembly
Fig. 835.10 Six Great Circles Folded to Form Octahedron.
Fig. 841.30