You are on page 1of 10

ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820

Introduction Subpart A
0.1 General
This International Standard specifies requirements for a quality General Provisions
management system that can be used by an organization for the design
and development, production, installation, and servicing of medical
devices, and the design, development, and provision of related services. Note the ISO focus on enhancement of Customer Requirements, a
It can also be used by internal and external parties, including Process Approach to the development of a Quality Management system,
certification bodies, to assess the organization’s ability to meet customer and Data Analysis as an input into Improvement/Maintenance System.
and regulatory requirements. Information marked “NOTE” is for
guidance in understanding or clarifying the associated requirement.
It is emphasized that the quality management system requirements
specified in this International Standard are complementary to technical
requirements for products.
The adoption of a quality management system should be a strategic
decision of an organization. The design and implementation of an
organization’s quality management system is influenced by varying
needs, particular objectives, the products provided, the processes
employed, and the size and structure of the organization. It is not the
intent of this International Standard to imply uniformity in the structure
of quality management systems or uniformity of documentation.
There is a wide variety of medical devices, and some of the particular
requirements of this International Standard only apply to named groups
of medical devices. These groups are defined in Clause 3.

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 1 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
0.2 Process approach
This International Standard is based on a process approach to quality
management.
Any activity that receives inputs and converts them to outputs can be
considered as a process.
For an organization to function effectively, it has to identify and manage
numerous linked processes.
Often the output from one process directly forms the input to the next.
The application of a system of processes within an organization,
together with the identification and interactions of these processes, and
their management, can be referred to as the “process approach.”

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 2 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
0.3 Relationship with other standards NOTE: QSR was harmonized to ISO 9001:1994 and is similar to ISO
0.3.1 Relationship with ISO 9001 13485:1996.
While this is a stand-alone standard, it is based on ISO 9001.
Those clauses or subclauses that are quoted directly and unchanged from
ISO 9001 are in normal font. The fact that these subclauses are
presented unchanged is noted in Annex B (of the standard).
Where the text of this International Standard is not identical to the text
of ISO 9001, the sentence or indent containing that text as a whole is
shown in italics (in blue italics for electronic versions). The nature and
reasons for the text changes are noted in Annex B (of the standard).
Font differences are not maintained in this matrix.
0.3.2 Relationship with ISO/TR 14969
ISO/TR 14969 is a Technical Report intended to provide guidance for
the implementation of ISO 13485.

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 3 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
0.4 Compatibility with other management systems
This International Standard follows the format of ISO 9001 for the
convenience of users in the medical device community.
This International Standard does not include requirements specific to
other management systems, such as those particular to environmental
management, occupational health and safety management, or financial
management.
However, this International Standard enables an organization to align or
integrate its own quality management system with related management
system requirements. It is possible for an organization to adapt its
existing management system(s) in order to establish a quality
management system that complies with the requirements of this
International Standard.

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 4 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
1 Scope
1.1 General
This International Standard specifies requirements for a quality
management system where an organization needs to demonstrate its
ability to provide medical devices and related services that consistently
meet customer requirements and regulatory requirements applicable to
medical devices and related services. The primary objective of this
International Standard is to facilitate harmonized medical device
regulatory requirements for quality management systems. As a result, it
includes some particular requirements for medical devices and excludes
some of the requirements of ISO 9001 that are not appropriate as
regulatory requirements. Because of these exclusions, organizations
whose quality management systems conform to this International
Standard cannot claim conformity to ISO 9001 unless their quality
management systems conform to all the requirements of ISO 9001 (see
Annex B).

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 5 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
1 Scope Sec. 820.1
1.2 Application
All requirements of this International Standard are specific to Scope
organizations providing medical devices, regardless of the type or size
of the organization. If regulatory requirements permit exclusions of (a) Applicability.
design and development controls (see 7.3), this can be used as a
justification for their exclusion from the quality management system. (1) Current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) requirements are
These regulations can provide alternative arrangements that are to be set forth in this quality system regulation. The requirements in
addressed in the quality management system. It is the responsibility of this part govern the methods used in and the facilities and
the organization to ensure that claims of conformity with this controls used for, the design, manufacture, packaging, labeling,
International Standard reflect exclusion of design and development storage, installation, and servicing of all finished devices
controls [see 4.2.2 a) and 7.3]. intended for human use. The requirements in this part are
If any requirement(s) in Clause 7 of this International Standard is (are) intended to ensure that finished devices will be safe and effective
not applicable due to the nature of the medical device(s) for which the and otherwise in compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and
quality management system is applied, the organization does not need to Cosmetic Act (the act). This part establishes basic requirements
include such a requirement(s) in its quality management system [see applicable to manufacturers of finished medical devices. If a
4.2.2 a)]. manufacturer engages in only some operations subject to the
The processes required by this International Standard, which are requirements in this part, and not in others, that manufacturer
applicable to the medical device(s), but which are not performed by the need only comply with those requirements applicable to the
organization, are the responsibility of the organization and are accounted operations in which it is engaged. With respect to class I
for in the organization’s quality management system [see 4.1 a)]. devices, design controls apply only to those devices listed in Sec.
In this International Standard, the terms “if appropriate” and “where 820.30(a)(2). This regulation does not apply to manufacturers of
appropriate” are used several times. When a requirement is qualified by components or parts of finished devices, but such manufacturers
either of these phrases, it is deemed to be “appropriate” unless the are encouraged to use appropriate provisions of this regulation as
organization can document a justification otherwise. A requirement is guidance. Manufacturers of human blood and blood components
considered “appropriate” if it is necessary in order for are not subject to this part, but are subject to part 606 of this
— the product to meet specified requirements, and/or chapter.
— the organization to carry out corrective action. (2) The provisions of this part shall be applicable to any finished
device as defined in this part, intended for human use, that is
manufactured, imported, or offered for import in any State or
Territory of the United States, the District of Columbia, or the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 6 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
(3) In this regulation the term “where appropriate” is used several
times. When a requirement is qualified by “where appropriate”,
it is deemed to be “appropriate” unless the manufacturer can
document justification otherwise. A requirement is
“appropriate” if non-implementation could reasonably be
expected to result in the product not meeting its specified
requirements or the manufacturer not being able to carry out any
necessary corrective action.

(b) Limitations

The quality system regulation in this part supplements regulations in


other parts of this chapter except where explicitly stated otherwise.

In the event that it is impossible to comply with all applicable


regulations, both in this part and in other parts of this chapter, the
regulations specifically applicable to the device in question shall
supersede any other generally applicable requirements.

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 7 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
2 Normative references (c) Authority.
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the
application of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited Part 820 is established and issued under authority of sections 501, 502,
applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced 510, 513, 514, 515, 518, 519, 520, 522, 701, 704, 801, 803 of the act (21
document (including any amendments) applies. U.S.C. 351, 352, 360, 360c, 360d, 360e, 360h, 360i, 360j, 360l, 371,
ISO 9000:2000, Quality management systems—Fundamentals and 374, 381, 383). The failure to comply with any applicable provision in
vocabulary this part renders a device adulterated under section 501(h) of the act.
Such a device, as well as any person responsible for the failure to
comply, is subject to regulatory action.

(d) Foreign manufacturers

If a manufacturer who offers devices for import into the United States
refuses to permit or allow the completion of a Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) inspection of the foreign facility for the purpose
of determining compliance with this part, it shall appear for purposes of
section 801(a) of the act, that the methods used in, and the facilities and
controls used for, the design, manufacture, packaging, labeling, storage,
installation, or servicing of any devices produced at such facility that are
offered for import into the United States do not conform to the
requirements of section 520(f) of the act and this part and that the
devices manufactured at that facility are adulterated under section
501(h) of the act.

(e) Exemptions or variances

(1) Any person who wishes to petition for an exemption or variance


from any device quality system requirement is subject to the
requirements of section 520(f)(2) of the act.

Petitions for an exemption or variance shall be submitted according to


the procedures set forth in Sec. 10.30 of this chapter, the FDA’s
administrative procedures.

Guidance is available from the Center for Devices and Radiological

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 8 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
Health, Division of small Manufacturers Assistance, (HFZ-220), 1350
Piccard Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, U.S.A., telephone 1-800-638-2041
or 1-301-443-6597, FAX 1-301-443-8818.

(2) FDA may initiate and grant a variance from any device quality
system requirement when the agency determines that such variance is in
the best interest of the public health. Such variance will remain in effect
only so long as there remains a public health need for the device and the
device would not likely be made sufficiently available without the
variance.

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 9 of 69
ISO – 13485 (2003) FDA QSR 21 CFR 820
3 Terms and definitions Sec. 820 3.3
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in
ISO 9000 apply, together with the following. Definitions.
The following terms, used in this edition of ISO 13485 to describe the
supply chain, have been changed to reflect the vocabulary currently (a) Act means the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended
used: (sects. 201-903, 52 Stat, 1040 et seq., as amended (21 U.S.C. 321-394)).
supplier------------->organization---------->customer

The term “organization” replaces the term “supplier” used in ISO


13485:1996, and refers to the unit to which this International Standard
applies. Also, the term “supplier” now replaces the term
“subcontractor.”
Throughout the text of this International Standard, wherever the term
“product” occurs, it can also mean “service.”
Wherever requirements are specified as applying to “medical devices,”
the requirements apply equally to related services as supplied by the
organization.
The following definitions should be regarded as generic, as definitions
provided in national regulations can differ slightly and take precedence.

3.1 Active implantable medical device: active medical device All definitions in section 201 of the act shall apply to the regulations in
which is intended to be totally or partially introduced, surgically or this part.
medically, into the human body or by medical intervention into a natural
orifice, and which is intended to remain after the procedure.

3.2 Active medical device: medical device relying for its


functioning on a source of electrical energy or any source of power other
than that directly generated by the human body or gravity.

Comparative Matrix for Quality System Regulations


© 2004 The Anson Group Page 10 of 69

You might also like