TSLB3193 MULTILITERACIES

COURSEWORK ASSESSMENT RUBRICS

TASK 1: INFOGRAPHIC POSTER (20%) [individual task]

Grade Weighting/ Descriptors

marks (20)
Content
High 18.0 - 20.0 Response to quotation demonstrates a deep understanding of subject
distincti knowledge, very well-supported by highly relevant data. (A2)
on Excellent ability to explain, analyse (C4) and evaluate information (CTPS2)
A+ Very well-organised, highly coherent visual narrative with very clear
(90- 100) cohesion.
Excellent overall clarity of concept.
All sources properly documented and attributed on infographic.
Very extensive evidence of creative and critical thinking. (CTPS2; C:
creativity & critical thinking)
Visual composition
Flow of images and text is very well organized with an excellent readable
narrativity.
Includes highly informative, highly plausible title.
Very creative layout, thoroughly uncluttered. (C: creativity)
Very apt use of images with minimal text, includes highly balanced and
very harmonious use of space.
Very pleasing and very well-coordinated colour scheme used to visually
separate content and very clearly reflect links between ideas, for optimized
readability.
Commendable display of digital citizenship.
Highly consistent use of standard grammar, punctuation, and spelling--no
typos or colloquialisms.

Content
Distincti 15.0 – 17.9 Response to quotation demonstrates a good understanding of subject
on knowledge, well-supported by relevant data. (A2)
A- & A Good ability to explain, analyse (C4) and evaluate information (CTPS2)
(75- 89) Well-organised, coherent visual narrative with clear cohesion.
Overall clarity of concept is good
Almost all sources are properly documented and attributed on infographic.
Good evidence of creative and critical thinking. (CTPS2; C: creativity &
critical thinking)
Visual composition
Flow of images and text is well organized with good readable narrativity.
Includes good informative, plausible title.
Creative layout, uncluttered. (C: creativity)
Apt use of images with minimal text, includes balanced and harmonious
use of space.
Pleasing and coordinated colour scheme used to visually separate content
and clearly reflect links between ideas, for optimized readability.
Good display of digital citizenship.
Consistent use of standard grammar, punctuation, and spelling--minimal
typos or colloquialisms.
Content
Credit 12.0 – 14.9 Response to quotation demonstrates a fairly good understanding of
B- ,B & subject knowledge, reasonably supported by some relevant data. (A2)
B+ Fairly good ability to explain, analyse (C4) and evaluate information
(60-74) (CTPS2)
Fairly well organised, coherent visual narrative with reasonably clear
cohesion.
Overall clarity of concept is fairly good.
Some sources properly documented and attributed on infographic.

1
 Fair evidence of creative and critical thinking. (CTPS2; C: creativity &
critical thinking)
Visual composition
Flow of images and text is reasonably organized with fairly readable
narrativity.
Includes reasonably informative, fairly plausible title.
Reasonable layout, fairly uncluttered. (C: creativity)
Fairly apt use of images with text, includes fairly balanced use of space.
Reasonably pleasing and coordinated colour scheme used to visually
separate content and links between ideas fairly clear.
Reasonable display of digital citizenship.
Fairly consistent use of standard grammar, punctuation, and spelling-- few
typos or colloquialisms.
Content
Pass 10.0 - 11.9 Response to quotation demonstrates an adequate understanding of
C dan subject knowledge although support may be lacking (A2)
C+ Adequate ability to explain, analyse (C4) and evaluate information
(50 -59) (CTPS2)
Adequately organised into a coherent visual narrative although cohesion
maybe be lacking.
Clarity of concept is adequate.
Few sources adequately documented and attributed on infographic.
Adequate evidence of creative and critical thinking. (CTPS2; C: creativity &
critical thinking)
Visual composition
Flow of images and text is adequately organized with satisfactory readable
narrativity.
Includes adequately informative, plausible title.
Satisfactory layout but some cluttered areas. (C: creativity)
Satisfactory use of images with text, but use of space not entirely
balanced.
Adequately coordinated colour scheme used to visually separate content
and links between ideas satisfactorily.
Adequate display of digital citizenship.
Adequate use of standard grammar, punctuation, and spelling-- some
typos or colloquialisms.
Fail Content
C-, D+, <10.0 Response to quotation does not demonstrate any understanding of subject
D, E dan knowledge and support, if any, is irrelevant. (A2)
F Inability to explain, analyse (C4) and evaluate information (CTPS2)
(0-49) Poorly organised, incoherent visual narrative with poor cohesion.
Poor overall clarity of concept.
Sources not documented and attributed on infographic.
No evidence of creative and critical thinking. (CTPS2; C: creativity &
critical thinking)
Visual composition
Flow of images and text is haphazard with poor readable narrativity.
Title is inappropriate or missing.
Poor layout, cluttered with irrelevant images and distracting. (C: creativity)
Use of images, text and space not balanced.
Dull & uncoordinated colour scheme that does not separate content and
links between ideas satisfactorily.
Poor display of digital citizenship.
Inaccurate use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling-- numerous
language errors.

2
TASK 2 : MULTIMODAL MEDIA PRESENTATION (20%) [Group Task]

Grade Weighting/ Descriptors

marks (20)
Analysis of issue
High 18.0 - 20.0 Very comprehensive and highly succint analysis of issue.
distinction Highly accurate identification of voice supported by highly convincing
A+ justification. Outstanding analysis of factors influencing writer’s ‘voice’.
(90- 100) (EQ2; C: critical thinking)
Multimodality in presentation
Presentation is an outstanding product of digital multimodal composition
conveying highly coherent message to the audience by using appropriate
structure, medium, mode, and technique.(CS4, C6, EQ3)
Delivery
Very clear presentation with highly confident delivery.
Excellent use of technology in presentation.(CS4)
Language is almost entirely accurate.
Highly engaging.
Meaning is concise, precise and unambiguous. (C: communication, EQ3)
Teamwork
Excellent ability to work as a team and shows responsibility for the
group’s decision (TS5, C: collaboration)
Analysis of issue
Distinction 15.0 – 17.9 Comprehensive and succint analysis of issue.
A- & A Accurate identification of voice supported by convincing justification.
(75- 89) Good analysis of factors influencing writer’s ‘voice’. (EQ2; C: critical
thinking)
Multimodality in presentation
Presentation is a very good product of digital multimodal composition
conveying a coherent message to the audience by using appropriate
structure, medium, mode, and technique.(CS4, C6, EQ3)
Delivery
Clear presentation with confident delivery.
Good use of technology in presentation.(CS4)
Few linguistic errors.
Engages the audience.
Meaning is concise, precise and unambiguous. (C: communication, EQ3)
Teamwork
Good ability to work as a team and shows responsibility for the group’s
decision (TS5, C: collaboration)
Analysis of issue
Credit 12.0 – 14.9 Fairly accurate identification of voice supported by fairly convincing
B- ,B & justification. Fairly good analysis of factors influencing writer’s ‘voice’.
B+ (EQ2; C: critical thinking)
(60-74) Multimodality in presentation
Presentation is a fairly good product of digital multimodal composition
conveying fairly coherent message to audiences by using appropriate
structure, medium, mode, and technique.(CS4, C6, EQ3)
Delivery
Fairly clear presentation with some confidence in delivery.
Fairly good use of technology in presentation.(CS4)
Some errors in language.
Fairly engaging.
Meaning is fairly concise and precise and generally unambiguous.
(C: communication, EQ3)
Teamwork
Fairly good ability to work as a team and shows some responsibility for
the group’s decision (TS5, C: collaboration)

3
 Analysis of issue
Pass 10.0 - 11.9 Adequate analysis of issue. Acceptable identification of voice supported
C dan C+ by satisfactory justification.
(50 -59) Adequate analysis of factors influencing writer’s ‘voice’ (EQ2; C: critical
thinking)
Multimodality in presentation
Presentation is an adequate product of digital multimodal composition
conveying sufficient message to the audience by using adequate
structure, medium, mode, and technique.(CS4, C6, EQ3)
Delivery
Satisfactory presentation with adequate use of technology in
presentation.(CS4)
Language errors at times impede flow of presentation.
Somewhat engaging delivery but unable to hold audience attention.
Meaning is adequately conveyed with some clarity. (C: communication,
EQ3)
Teamwork
Satisfactory ability to work as a team and shows satisfactory responsibility
for the group’s decision (TS5, C: collaboration)
Fail Analysis of issue
C-, D+, D, <10.0 Analysis of issue is grossly inappropriate or barely done. Identification of
E dan F voice, if any, is inaccurate. Minimal or no analysis of factors influencing
(0-49) writer’s ‘voice’ (EQ2; C: critical thinking)
Multimodality in presentation
Presentation is a poor product of digital multimodal composition
conveying incoherent message to the audience by using inappropriate
structure, medium, mode, and technique.(CS4, C6, EQ3)
Delivery
Poor delivery of content with minimal or no use of technology in
presentation.(CS4)
Language is incoherent and contains numerous gross errors.
Uninteresting and dull.
Meaning is often ambiguous. (C: communication, EQ3)
Teamwork
Unable to work as a team and does not show responsibility for the
group’s decision (TS5, C: collaboration)

TASK 3: WRITTEN ESSAY (30%) [Individual Task]

Grade Weighting/ Descriptors

marks (30)
Content
High 27.0 - 30.0 Outstanding ability to create a counter-text demonstrating a highly
distinction identifiable voice (C6).
A+ Comprehensive treatment of issue with insightful arguments indicating
(90- 100)
excellent ability to think out of the box.(CTPS4)
Language
Written in an excellent academic style with excellent register.
Hardly any errors in spelling and grammar.
Organisation
Excellent structure and very clear organisation of ideas with each section
related to others in a very coherent and cohesive manner.
References
Excellent and varied range of sources used in independent learning.(LL2)

4
 Content
Distinction 22.5 – 26.9 Good ability to create a counter-text demonstrating an identifiable
A- & A voice(C6).
(75- 89) Good treatment of issue with clear arguments indicating some ability to
think out of the box. (CTPS4)
Language
Written in a good academic style with good register.
Few errors in spelling and grammar.
Organisation
Good, clear structure and organisation of ideas with each section related
to others coherently and cohesively.
References
Good range of sources used in independent learning.(LL2)
Content
Credit 18.0 - 22.4 Fairly good ability to create counter-text demonstrating an identifiable
B- ,B & B+ voice (C6).
(60-74) Reasonable treatment of issue with appropriate arguments indicating
satisfactory ability to think out of the box. (CTPS4, C6)
Language
Written in a fairly good, appropriate academic style and appropriate
register.
Some errors in spelling or grammar
Organisation
Fairly good structure and organisation with sections logically related to
others in a fairly coherent and cohesive manner.
References
Fairly good range of sources used in independent learning.(LL2)
Content
Pass 15.0 – 17.9 Adequate counter-text demonstrating an identifiable voice.
C dan C+ Adequate treatment of issue with few arguments.
(50 -59) Limited ability to think out of the box. (CTPS4, C6)
Language
Adequately appropriate academic style and register, although not always
sustained. Significant errors in spelling and grammar but does not impede
meaning.
Organisation
Adequate organisation despite some lapses in coherence and/or lack of
cohesiveness.
References
Adequate range of sources used in independent learning.(LL2)
Fail Content
C-, D+, D, <15.0 Counter-text contains flawed arguments that does not demonstrate an
E dan F identifiable voice.
(0-49) No ability to think out of the box. (CTPS4, C6)
Language
No evidence of an appropriate academic style and register is also
inappropriate.
Gross errors in spelling and grammar that impede meaning.
Organisation
Poor organisation.
References
Hardly any sources used in independent learning.(LL2)