1. What do you think the authors mean by a principles-versus a rules-based system of
accounting? The authors means to compare between the principle based and the rules based and to found how specific a standard is in regulating the reparation of financial statements in accounting system. 2. What are the measurement problems they allude to? The measurement problems that they allude to is the fair value measurement, because the definition of fair value itself is left ambiguous primarily because there are no discussion of the underlying conceptual framework of valuation which has been fully explored else where in professional literature using the concept of “deprival and relief value”. It is not clear whether the board has come to a view on these conceptual issues and now the board is merely avoiding these issues 3. What does Macve mean by the underlying conceptual framework? What problems doe she see with a fair value approach the underlying conceptual framework is a basic framework that provides an explanation of the nature of the elements of financial statements, their limitations, and the main objectives of reporting. Macve sees that the absence of underlying conceptual frameworks causes ambiguity in valuation methods. 4. Do you think there is any difference between measures and values? Yes there is difference between measures and values. What is meant by “value” is economic benefits which are expected to be generated by an asset / cash generating unit. While “measures” are the monetary unit of an element displayed in financial statements.
Case study 5.1
1. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each suggested measurement technique. 2. Make a recommendation as to which measurement technique should be used. 3. Would you consider using more than one measurement technique? Why or why not?