OUTLINE

I. Introduction
Thesis statement: However, there are several fun facts that you may not know about Albert
Einstein.
II. Body: Details of fun facts about Einstein
A. Supporting idea 1: Israel's president candidacy
B. Supporting idea 2: Einstein feeling on atomic bomb
C. Supporting idea 3: Einstein mental retardation
E. Supporting idea 4: Einstein favorite subjects
III. Conclusion:
Restatement: the genius and influence of Einstein

ALBERT EINSTEIN

Albert Einstein is considered one of the greatest scientists and geniuses of all time. He
was the one who discovered the scientific formula E=MC2 which stands for energy and mass.
He won a Nobel Peace Prize in 1921 for his work in Physics, and was a major player in the
making of the Atomic Bomb that helped to put an end to World War II. However, there are
several fun facts that you may not know about Albert Einstein.
One interesting tidbit about Albert Einstein is when Israel was established as a country
in 1952, many citizens of the newly developed country wanted Albert Einstein to be their
president, but he turned them down. Albert Einstein was very ashamed and sadden over the
fact that he played a major role in the creation of a very dangerous weapon called the Atomic
Bomb. Another example of interesting fact about Albert Einstein is that many individuals do
not know that Albert Einstein had an extremely large head when he was born and many
doctors believed that due to his big head he may suffer from mental retardation. Michio Kaku
(2015) wrote a short biography in Britannica Encyclopedia entitled “Albert Einstein” that
Einstein’s favorite subjects from grade school to college were philosophy and geometry, and
he loved and admired music and nature.
Albert Einstein will continue to be a great influence in the field of science and physics.
He used his gifts and talents to make the world a better place for all human beings.
----------
 OUTLINE
I. Introduction
Thesis statement: Today biology is subdivided into hierarchies based on the molecule, the cell,
the organism, and the population.
II. Body: Definition/scope of subdivisions in Biology
A. Supporting idea 1: molecular biology
B. Supporting idea 2: cellular biology
C. Supporting idea 3: organismal biology
D. Supporting idea 4: population biology
III. Conclusion
Prediction: shifting of subdivisions of biology

BIOLOGY

Biology is the science of life. The term was introduced in Germany in 1800 and
popularized by the French naturalist Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck as a means of encompassing
the growing number of disciplines involved with the study of living forms. The limits of the
science, however, have always been difficult to determine, and as the scope of biology has
shifted over the years, its subject areas have been changed and reorganized. Today biology is
subdivided into hierarchies based on the molecule, the cell, the organism, and the population.
Released in Encarta (2009), John Tyler Bonner explained each subdivisions of Biology.
Molecular biology, which spans biophysics and biochemistry, has made the most fundamental
contributions to modern biology; much is now known about the structure and action of
nucleic acids and protein, the key molecules of all living matter. Cellular biology is closely
linked with molecular biology. To understand the functions of the cell—the basic structural
unit of living matter—cell biologists study its components on the molecular level. Organismal
biology, in turn, is related to cellular biology, because the life functions of multicellular
organisms are governed by the activities and interactions of their cellular component that
includes their growth and development (developmental biology) and how they function
(physiology). Population biology became firmly established as a major subdivision of biological
studies in the 1970s. Central to this field is evolutionary biology and population genetics, the
study of gene changes in populations, and ecology, the study of populations in their natural
habitats, have been established subject areas since the 1930s.
Biology also includes the study of humans at the molecular, cellular, and organismal
levels. The boundaries and subdivisions of biology, however, are as fluid today as they have
always been, and further shifts may be expected.
----------
OUTLINE
I. Introduction
Thesis statement: These arguments on rich countries should not help poor countries will be
analysed prior to coming to a reasoned conclusion.
II. Body: Arguments of rich countries should not help poor countries
A. Supporting idea 1: rich countries tend to control poor countries
B. Supporting idea 2: bad administration of poorer countries
C. Supporting idea 3: poorer countries managed by corrupted government
III. Conclusion
Suggestion: poorer countries should manage themeselves

POOR COUNTRIES SHOULD MANAGE THEMSELVES

It is true that many countries of this world are facing different types of problems,
especially they have the lack of food and appropriate education. It is frequently believed
that it is the responsibility of the richer country to provide these basic things to the poorer
country. However, this serious issue is refuted by others. These arguments on rich countries
should not help poor countries will be analysed prior to coming to a reasoned conclusion.
It is felt by many that the governments of the poorer countries should solve these
dangerous problems for many reasons. Firstly, when the richer country gives money as a
support for the poorer country, they also want to control the regimes of the poor countries,
which may have brought the catastrophic effect on the underdeveloped country. Secondly,
the administration of the poorer nation is not so experienced, so they maybe not able to
properly utilise these supported things. Finally, most governments of the poorer countries
are corrupted, so there is a great risk to misuse these supported things. In fact, helping poor
countries may cause hurt for all parties, as stated by a Nobel Laureate in economics, Angus
Deaton, published by Washington Post (2015).

In conclusion, after conducting these analyses, it is clear that both points of view
have logical arguments. However, the governments of the poorer countries should take the
responsibility of their people. Otherwise, the richer country will control the poorer country.