Republic of the Philippines ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION San Miguel Avenue, Pasig City IN| THE MATTER OF THE a APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN ADJUSTMENT IN RATES UNDER THE RULES FOR SETTING ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES’ WHEELING RATES (RSEC-WR), WITH PRAYER FOR PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC TARLAC W ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (TARELCO I), DoCckE Date: ow DECISION Before the Commission for resolution are the original and amended applications filed on November 6 and 20, 2009, respectively, by the Tarlac Il Electric Cooperative, Inc. (TARELCO I!) for approval of an adjustment in rates under the Rules for Setting the Electric Cooperatives’ Wheeling Rates (RSEC-WR), with prayer for provisional authority. Having found said applications sufficient in form and in substance with the required fees having been paid, an Order and a Notice of Public Hearing, both dated January 11, 2010, were issued setting the same for jurisdictional hearing on February 9, 2010. In the same Order, the Commission provisionally authorized TARELCO II to implement the following Revised Rate Schedule effective its January 2010 billing period:ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 2 of 16 Tow vorTAGe ‘Wate VOLTAGE Denard have ar 1200 3100 = | nose] 12084] Darbwionsyten care | PR ovs76 | o73to| 07859) oser2[ oan | oaeni| osers| 04061 hy aes Fetal Caste Chr Preto nol 38] «6s cel as] «nl ne Sop Sten age ae oie? eterng Cares: tal utomer ete erect | Sooo0| 31.26) 12480| sebae[ 3007] ia] seeau| 200) Meteigspsten hays | Pooh 03460 iz face Pen ‘ozs0a | ozs0e | azsor| ona04] aze0e | ozo] 02208] o2a0e End of year t away 2011 Denard Gage kw : zisse| 21968) Dstibuionysten Gunge | PAPA osraz| 07395] 07505] 0795] 07895] _a7s85 - fot chars: Feta Caster Chore Pelco axl enl an eal asl axl es Sup Siten are rep ar [eer Cages: fetal asomer urge Prvinercine [30000] 3598] 354) asee] ssae) se) 508) 594 Meteing Sten hare [Pah 04R6 CS. eh axsns | ozsae] ozsce] oases] ozace] czs01| 02904] aso Danibatonyten Gorge | PoP sree] 07595] a7ses | o7ses| arses | arses] Ip charges FeaiCuiome chage | rPfeine axl axl asl axl ex, en! as Sup Sten Gare enh 26001 een Charge: eta Gaston Charge ipimewwino [| so000| a5se) 3594] 54] sae] s594) sss] a5 Meter Sten Gurge | PPA 046 [asc eh ‘ozsos] ozs] a2s0s] casos] o2sos] 02008 [ caso] caseERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 3 of 16 TARELCO II was directed to cause the publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, at its own expense, twice (2x) for two (2) successive weeks in two (2) newspapers of general circulation in the Philippines, with the date of the last publication to be made not later than ten (10) days before the date of the scheduled initial hearing, It was also directed to inform the consumers within its franchise area, by any other ‘means available and appropriate, of the filing of the instant applications, its reasons therefor and of the scheduled hearing thereon. The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), the Commission on Audit (COA) and the Committees on Energy of both Houses of Congress were furnished with copies of the Order and the attached Notice of Public Hearing and were requested to have their respective duly authorized representatives present at the aforesaid hearing. Likewise, the Office of the Provincial Governor of Tarlac and the Offices of the Mayors of the Municipalities within TARELCO II's franchise area were furnished with copies of the Order and the Notice of Public Hearing, for the appropriate posting thereof on their respective bulletin boards. During the February 9, 2010 hearing, only TARELCO II appeared. No intervenor/oppositor appeared. It presented its proofs of compliance with the Publication and posting of notice requirements of the Commission which were duly marked as Exhibits “A” to “P-3", inclusive, and conducted an expository presentation of its application. The Commission noted the “Pre-Trial Brief” and "Manifestation (On the Proposed Recovery Scheme of the Provisionally approved RSEC-WR Rate Adjustment of January 2010)" filed by TARELCO II on February 2, 2010 and March 15, 2010, respectively.ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 4 of 16 In view of the absence of intervenors/oppositors, TARELCO II moved for a declaration of general default. Said motion was granted. On August 31, 2010, the Commission issued an Order setting the instant applications for evidentiary hearing on September 14, 2010. At the September 14, 2010 hearing, TARELCO II presented its witnesses, Ms. Rosemarie T. Timbol, its Finance Services Department (FSD) Manager and Ms. Alona Z. David, its Information Technology Department (ITD), who testified on the following: 1) the filing of the instant applications; 2) the identification of the pre-filing and jurisdictional requirements of the Commission; 3) the new rate setting methodology of RSEC-WR; 4) the proposed initial rate caps for Distribution, Supply and Metering (DSM); 5) the Members’ Contribution for Capital Expenditure (MCC); and 6) the proposed transition rates. In the course thereof, TARELCO II presented additional documents which were duly marked as exhibits, ‘The direct examinations having been terminated, the Commission propounded clarificatory questions on the said witnesses. Thereafter, TARELCO II was directed to file its formal offer of evidence. On September 30, 2010, TARELCO II filed its "Formal Offer of Evidence” which is hereby admitted for being relevant and material in the resolution of the case.ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2014 Page 5 of 16 DISCUSSION On September 23, 2009, the Commission promulgated Resolution No. 20, Series of 2009, entitled “A Resolution Adopting the Rules for Setting the Electric Cooperatives’ Wheeling Rates (RSEC-WR)”. The Commission deems it necessary to establish a new rate-setting methodology for on-grid electric cooperatives (ECs) considering that their current rates, under a cash flow rate-setting methodology, are no longer responsive inasmuch as the costs of providing electric service to the consumers increased significantly from the time their rates were determined by the Commission based on 2000 test year, The regulatory framework as embodied in the RSEC-WR seeks to encourage efficiency in the operations of the ECs, to provide incentives for their good performance and to ease regulatory burden by addressing the regulatory lag in the cash flow rate-setting methodology. |. Classification of Electric Cooperatives (ECs) The RSEC-WR classified the on-grid ECs into seven (7) groups based on characteristics or variables which affects the ECs’ total operating distribution cost and operating distribution cost per kWh, namely: 1) size (number of customers); and 2) consumption (MWH sales per customer). In classifying the ECs, the Commission used the data submitted by the ECs relative to their respective operating distribution costs (Operations and Maintenance Expenses, Customer Expenses and General and Administrative Expenses) for the years 2001 to 2006 and the average adjusted unbundled rates (Reinvestment Fund and Debt Service). V 4ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2014 Page 6 of 16 ‘Shown below are the number of ECs in a group and the characteristics used in the classification: Group Characteristics ] ‘SIZE GROUP | NO.OF | Customer Consumption | (No. of Customers, ECs (MWH per year) in Thousand) A m1 = e jasaanif Ota DB nau! B 16 <1 25 to 50 Cc 5 <1 50 to 100 D 17 ito2 10 to 50 E 28 1102 50 to 100 i 15 to 3 20 to 150 Gc 6 3105 30to150_—| TARELCO II's consumption per year (MWH sales per customer) is 1.8742 MWH and the number of its customers is 58,006. Inasmuch as TARELCO II's consumption is between 1 to 2 MWH and the number of its customers is within the range of 50,000 to 100,000, it is categorized as Group E. Il, Development of the Initial Tariff Under the RSEC-WR, there shall be transition from the current tariff under the cash flow rate-setting methodology towards the Initial Tariff. Such Initial Tariff consists of the DSM Charges (operating cost) and MCC (capital cost), Operating Cost The operating cost per kWh as of 2000 for DSM of each EC was adjusted to 2008 level using the average rate of increase in minimum wages for the period 2001 to 2006 of 5.12%. The wage index was used since the DSM cost is seventy percent (70%) labor. Thereafter, the Commission determined the 2008 Median for the EC’s operating costs.ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 7 of 16 Members’ Contribution for Capital Expenditure (MCC) The EC's current tariff as approved by the Commission includes a reinvestment fund provision calculated at five percent (5%) of its unbundled retail rate (inclusive of generation, transmission, and distribution charges). This translates to an average of twenty-two percent (22%) of the ninety-eight (98) ECs’ operation and maintenance expense for 2006. The MCC Rate Cap was determined by applying the twenty-two Percent (22%) to the respective group's 2008 Median operating costs per kWh which was the basis for the ECs’ operating revenue requirements (ORR). ‘An appropriate level of operating cost and MCC rate cap was set for each group, as follows: 2008 LEVEL MEDIAN, MCC at 22% GROUP (PhP/kWh) (PhP/kWh) A 2.4200 0.5324 | 8B 1.8200 0.4004 c 1.6800 0.3696 D 1.1400 0.2508 E 1.3200 0.2904 F 0.9900 0.2178 EeseQiaeee|| 0.6900 0.1518 The ORR (operating cost) per group was functionalized (assigned to DSM functions) using the ratio of each group's DSM costs to the total costs as determined in. the Rate Unbundling Decision. The functionalized ORR was allocated into customer classes using a factor based on the causation principle. The allocation factors utilized were the group’s Non-Coincident Peak (NCP) Demand Ratio for Distribution and the fle |ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RG (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 8 of 16 Average Number of Customers Ratio for Supply and Metering. The allocated functionalized ORR of each customer class was translated into DSM rate caps. Ill, Development of New Customer Classes The new customer classes under the RSEC-WR are based on the power service delivery voltage used in serving the customers. The Commission found the new ‘customer segmentation as fair and reasonable as it allows a justifiable allocation of costs and is consistent with cost of service principle. Shown below are the new customer classes: NEW CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION T. Residential customers Those end-users that are registered as residential customers 2. Low Voltage customers Those end-users that are non residential and connected to Low Voltage (LV) (not exceeding 1 kV) 3 Higher Voltage customers Those end-users that are _non- residential and connected to Medium Voltage (a voltage level exceeding 1 kV up to 34.5 kV) or High Voltage (a voltage level exceeding 34.5 kV) WV. Proposed Transition Rates The initial DSM rate caps and the MCC rate caps for each group having been determined, TARELCO I filed the instant applications for approval of its proposed transition rates, to wit: a S OSHERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 9 of 16 Start of End of PARTICULARS. Unit Current_| Transition Transition Gust. Typo: Residential aa ee = Distribution PhPIKWh ‘Supply PhP/KWh na feels cea Motering PhP/meterimo ae aiid or ; oa aoa a Motoring PhP/KWh : eee jae Mcc PRP/KWh Final Loan Condonation PhP/KWh cae : E Cust. Type: Small Commercial Distribution PhP/Wh hia Crees [OSes OTS | Distribution PhP/KW : i e Supply PhP/kWh i : j 5 Supply PhP/custimo Gude | eeeeeener: |e |e eee Metering PhP/meterimo | ST SSMS] SSUES ae Metering PhPIRWh, : : Cc McC PhP/RWh : ieee aera Cae Final Loan Gondonation PRP/KWh Lata : : Final Loan Condonation Prpicusime | 74) : ji : Cust. Type: Large Commercial Distibton RPA err] ores | Oe Distribution PhP/KW. ae : z = Supply PhP/iWh - a z Supply PhP/custimo freee | eens FzOA | [motoring PhPImeterimo | SOT] SSSHST | BESET ae Metering PhP/KWh : ‘ McC. PhPIKWh oe eee er Final Loan Condonation PhP/KWh ieee : : : Final Loan Gondonation PhPicustimo Meee e : ‘ Cust. Type: Industrial Distribution PhPKWh TOE eee aan oe Distribution PhPIKW. oe : : Supply PAP/KWh : ; ; Supply PhP/custimo Selon | eeatemen| ae ical Metering PhPimeterimo | “700 eae eee aT | Metering PhP/KWh z : : mec PhP/Wh : cas eet Tz | Final Loan Gondonation PhP/RWh baad a : Final Loan Condonation PhPicusumo | 75) ; : i Cust. Type: Publie Building Distribution preswh | |e eee O75 |ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO II) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 10 of 16 Distribution PhPIKW, e = z e ‘Supply PhPIKWh. e - Z z a= Fipiauice TBO WEBS | —AZBOT FZU2OS| AFOOT WRIT] Ia IST] Metering | PrPimetsrine Metering PhP/kWh 2 a 5 THF T250F] Moc PhP/RWh uae Final Loan Gondonation PHP/KWh cae : : - Final Loan Condonation PhP/custimo ene L a Gust. Type: Street Lights Distribution PhP/KWh a OTE ane Distribution PhP/kW. : - - : Supply _ PhPWh : : L ~ HzO | a 8208 | a B03 | a 0205 Supply _ PhP/custimo =] TT] 8ST BRST] Metering PhP/meterimo Metering _ PhP/kWh - z i 2 Mc PhP/KWh ie uae Ze Final Loan Condonation PhP/KWh Li - : inal Loan Condonation PhP/eustimo EB ss i Cust. Type: Industri Distribution PHPKWh Tae 5 ai Distribution PRP/KW Gesu | tine tees | atten] ee Supply PhP/KWh ‘ - : z ‘Supply PhP/custimo ee [eee [eaeee onl Metering PhP/meterimo | 7 S0T[ SRST] SERTT Se Metering _ PhP /Wh : a mec PhP/KWh Final Loan Condonation PhPIKWh oar z : z Final Loan Condonation PhP/eustimo ee z 5 Cust. Type: Large Commercial Distribution PhP/RWh a z : Distribution PHPARW. ee see [eee Seas ‘Supply _ PRP/KWh EE i - = Supply PhP/custimo eter aaieecton| seer bial Metering Pheimeterime | "SE [SHAT | ass baton Metering PhP/KWh_ : i . : mcc PhP/KWh ; meee (aa meee Final Loan Gondonation PHPKWh iia z : : Final Loan Gondonation PhP/eustimo. oe z z Z f fo 4ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 11 of 16 TARELCO II proposed a full implementation of its DSM rates towards the Initial Tariff and its MCC rate to provide it with the necessary funds for its CAPEX projects. V. Provisional Authority Finding the instant applications to be consistent with the RSEC-WR and that the proposed rates are just and reasonable based on the documents submitted, the Commission issued an Order dated January 11, 2010 provisionally authorizing TARELCO II to implement the aforementioned Revised Rate Schedule effective its January 2010 billing period VI. The Final Transition Rates Schedule In the Commission's Order dated January 11, 2010, TARELCO II was directed to adopt the provisionally-approved Revised Rate Schedule starting its January 2010 billing period. TARELCO II received the said Order on January 28, 2010 and was able to implement it on its February 2010 billing period. Relative thereto, the Commission calculated the differential billing of TARELCO II and arrived at a net amount of PhP4,611,450,00 to be collected from its end-users starting April 2011 to December 2011. Said amount corresponds to the difference between its existing rates and the transition rates for January 2010 billing which is equivalent to an average rate of PhP0.0538/kWh. The adjustment in rates will be incorporated at the end of Year 1 transition rates under the line item "Distribution Charge & MCC Charges” (both expressed in PhP/kWh), fERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO I!) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 12 of 16 A thorough review and evaluation of the instant applications showed that the implementation of the Final Transition Rates Schedule, as shown below, will benefit TARELCO II's consumers in terms of a more reliable, efficient and quality electric service: Final Rate Schedule Start of Transition January 2010 - December 2010 Now Customer Classes Residents VOLTAGE, HIGHER VOLTAGE Curent Customer Claes sma | Large Pune | street Large esicontat | commercial | commercia! | ndustrat | euiling | Lights | industiat | Commercial Distribution Charges: Demand Charge lpnraw : =| 110000 | 11.0000 - =| 120.8400 | 120.8400 Distimuton Sytem Charge [pneawn | overs | 07360 o7esa | 00272 0200: | caso | osa7s| a4ost ‘Supply Charges: Retail Customer Charge | PRP /eustmo =| sto100 | 338500 | 4633300 | 20.6400 | 2a5700 | wes000| 20.8000 ‘Supply System Charge [PAPA oie z zi i : : : Metering Charges: | RetaliCustomer Charge PrPmetedimo | s.0000| 31.2600 | i2aa000 | 345.9400 | 20.0700 17.9700 | sas.saoo | 124.8000 | Metenng System Charge [PnPRWh 0.3460 é zi -[ — - wee PRA 2s] ozo] o200«| oz00| azo0e| 07008! 07004 | _o7004 End of year 4 January 2014 - March 2011, New Customer Classes Residential LOW VOLTAGE HIGHER VOLTAGE Curent Customer Class sma | Large Pusiic | street Large Residents! | commercial | commerciat| mdustiat | sulting | _tights_| industiat | Commercial | Distibution Charges: - Demand Charge Paenew z ifn ae zi | 219.6800 | “210.6600 Distribution System Ghaige | PRPAWn osre2 | o7se5 | o7e05 | 07505 | 07606 | o7s05 - : Supply Charges: His | Reta Customer Charge | PPieusvmo =| 428200 | 42.200 |" 42 9200 | “a2.0200| 429700 | a2.sz00| 42.9200 ‘Supply System Charge | PnP 6001 5 5 : : 2 Metering Charges: z Retail Customer Charge PnP/meterme | 5.0000 | 35.9400) 35.9400 | 36.6400. 35.9000 | 35.9900 | 35.9400 Metering System Charge [PRA 0.4326 z : ee : | ce PnPAWn oes | 02008] 02004 | o.2004| ozo | 02908] 02008 | _a200eERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 20114 Page 13 of 16 End of year 1 April 2011 - December 2011 New Customer Classes Residential LOW VOLTAGE HIGHER VOLTAGE ‘Current Customer Cis smn | tae Lege Restdentia’ | commercia! | Commarclal tngustiot_| Commercial Distribution Charges: Demand Chaige PaPnw 7 5 5 zi zi 219.6800 | 219.6500 Distibuton System Charge_[PREAWn ososs | o7e20 | 07636 | ovase | o77es{ 0777 | 0.0062 | 0.0036 | ‘Supply Charges: Retai Customer Charge [PhPvevsumo =| _azsz00 | 429200 | 42:8200 | 42.9200] «29200 | 429200 | 42.0200 ‘Supply Sysiem Charge | PhPawn 0.800% zi : 7 | [Ret Csr sige —[pomatme| —smoo} are SEG | SHOT BST | asa | aE | Metering System Charge —_[PRPAWh 0.4326, 7 7 2 7 | Moc PnenWh ose7| ose | o3ea7| oseer | over | ona | asear| _o3z07 End of Transition January 2012 - December 2012 ‘New Customer Glasses Residentiat LOW VOLTAGE HIGHER VOLTAGE eee smat | Large Purte | street Large Resicentat | commercial | commercial | industrial | eulging | Lights | Industiat_| commorcia Distribution Charges: | Demand Charge _ PRERW zi : fi : 2 =| 219.6800 | 219.6800 Oisutovton Syston Charge_[PHPAWh osre | 07s05| "0.7595 | o7s05| 07505 |_o.7s05 : | ‘Supply Charges: Retai Customer Charge | PhP/eustime =| 2x00 | 42,9200 |” 42.9200 [42.8000 | 42.8200 | az.sz00 | «2.9200 | ‘Supply System Charge | PReAWn 0.6008 : z 7 ea] Metering Charges: a RetoilCustomer Charge __{PnPrmetevmo |" s.o000 | 35.9400 | 86400 | 36.0400! saa400 | s59400 | s50000| se oa00 Metering System Charge | Pnenwn 0.4326, 5 i : 2 . z : Moc PRE 02004 | 02904] 02004 | 92004 | 0.2804] 02604] 0.2004] 0.2004 WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, the provisional authority granted to Tarlac II Electric Cooperative, Inc. (TARELCO I) on January 11, 2010 is hereby MADE PERMANENT. Accordingly, TARELCO Il is hereby directed to adopt the Final Transition Rates to be implemented effective its January 2010 to December 2012 billing periods, as pe 3 follows:ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO II) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 14 of 16 Start of Transition January 2010 - December 2010 New Customer Classes Residential LOW VOLTAGE HIGHER VOLTAGE eres ‘Smait Largo: Public Street Large Resigentat | commercial | commercat | incusteiat | auiging | Lights | industiat | cont ’Sctt Distribution Charges: Demand Charge PRPRw 7 =| t.0000 | 11-5000 7 = [120.8800 | 120.8400 Dstrbution System Charge [PnP overe| oreo |" ovess | ooar2 | owen | asset | oars | o.oo | Supply Cherges: ae) Retail Customer Charge | pnreusirno -|-stotoo [8.8300 | 48's300 | so.6000 | 23.5700) 83500 | 33.8300 Supply System Charge [pnPawn 04107 7 7 7 z ‘Metering Charges: ea Retai\Customer Cnarge _PP/metevne | s.0000 | 312600 | 124.0000 | 46.0400 | socr00 | s7.a7o0 | saa'ao0 | 120-8000 Metering System Charge | PHPAWh 0.3460 : : z - 5 : cc PAPI o2son | o2s08 | oze0s | 02004 | oe08| 0004] oom | oan End of year1 January 2014 - March 2011 New Customer Classes: Residential LOW VOLTAGE HIGHER VOLTAGE. eens ‘Smait Large: Public Street Large Residentai | commercia! | commercial | ings! | euiaing | tgs | ingustal | comment | Bistioution charges: | Demand Crarge [pnPaw : : 2 ziase0o | 2196800 |__Dsstrbtion Syetom Charge | PnPAW osrez| _o7s05| _o7s95| o7sos | 07805 | 07505 . ‘Supply Chargos: [Reta Customer Charge [PnPlcusiime «29200 | "42000 | s2.va00 | a2.9900| az0200 | az0z00 | a2.9200 | supply System Creme [PPA ‘0.600% : : 5 z - z z | Metering Charges: |-Fetal Customer Cnerge _PPinetewino | 5.0000 se. s4o0 | 359400 | 350400 | 359400 | ses00 | osama | se oa00 | Metering Sytem Charge | PRPAWh 0.4326 : 7 : 7 E - mice [PHEAWh 0.2906 0.2906 0.2004 [ 02904 | 02006] 0.2904 | 0.2904 9.2904ERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO I) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 15 of 16 End of year April 2011 to December 2011 New Customer Classes Residential LOW VOLTAGE HIGHER VOLTAGE Fennec mat | tave Pubic | stoot Large esidensat | commercial | Commer Butng | tights | inausviat_| comma: Distribution Charges: Demand Charge PAPA : z zi : 5 z1ee00 | 219.6800 Distibuion System Grae | PHPAWn oeoss | o7aze | 07606 | “ovess | ove | ovver | o0osz | o.ooss Supply Changes: Reta Customer Charge [Pa eustrw =| sesew [ea s2on | a2s2 | a2sz00 | waez00 | aaaz00| — a2oa00 Supply System Charge [PnP 26001 z z z [sane - Charges ‘i Rela Cstoner Chae —_|PREnSiaimo | —Feabo-| sear | asa} as ane: |a5 00" ae ban. | as 000} — Seo Mtorng System Charge |[PAPAWh 0.4326 : z z : 5 z ce parma | oszer | oseer | oszor | oszer| oxzar | ommer| oszar | _osza7 End of Transition January 2012 - December 2012 Now Customer Casees Residential LOW VOLTAGE HIGHER VOLTAGE saabetermeatieaal sma | Large Pubic | strat Large Residents | commercial | Commerc! | indurtit | cutaing | tints | tndustia_| como! Distribution Ghargos : | Demand Charge PPh z i es eT Dstrbvion Sytem Charge [PHPRW sree | 07608 | 07605 | o7s0s | o7ses | 0 ra0s = : [ Suppty Charger: z Retal stoner Charge |PrPieuimo =| sea | a2st00 | aze200 | weno | aasz0 | amo] aszo0 | suppy System Charge [ener oe001 z : : “fs : =| [ etoring Charges: fetal Customer Ghage _|PhPimetevno | 5.0000 | 36.0000 | a5oa00 | asaa00 | as0aoo | as0a00 |) seowo| —as.ouo0 Meteng System Charge [HPA 0.4325 : 5 : [ : i cc PrP zoos | ozs | 02904 | 07008 | 02004 | o7004| 02004 | o.0oe ‘SO ORDERED. Pasig City, January 10, 2041. ava ENAIDA G. CRUZ - (ees Chairperson frat has TAN ALEJANDRO Z BAR Commisiones " ioner MARIA TANEDA JOSEG/REYES Confhissioner eeERC CASE NO. 2009-118 RC (TARELCO Il) DECISION/January 10, 2011 Page 16 of 16 Copy Furnished 1. Atty. Zenon A. Suarez Counsel for TARELCO Room 303, Web-Jet Bidg., Quezon Avenue, Corner BMA St., Quezon City 2. ENGR. JOSE F. BOGNOT, JR. General Manager Tarlac Il Electric Cooperative, Inc. (TARELCO Il) San Nicolas, Concepcion, Tarlac 3. Office of the Solicitor General 134 Amorsolo Street, Legaspi Village Makati City, Metro Manila 4. Commission on Audit ‘Commonwealth Avenue ‘Quezon City, Metro Manila 5, Senate Committee on Energy GSIS Bldg. Roxas Bivd., Pasay City Metro Manila 6. House Committee on Energy Batasan Hills, Quezon City, Metro Manila 7. Office of the Provincial Governor Province of Tarlac 8. Office of the Provincial Governor Province of Nueva Ecija 9. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Bamban Province of Tarlac 10. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Capas Province of Tarlac 11. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Concepcion Province of Tarlac 12. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Zaragoza Province of Nueva Ecija 13, The Administrator National Electrification Administrator NIA Road, Diliman, Q.C. 14. The General Manager Phiippine Rural Electric Cooperatives Association (PHILRECA) 4 Floor, Casman Building 372 Quezon Avenue, Quezon City