BGP Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers Volume 3 Version 3.0 Student Guide Text Part Number: 97-1429.01Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved, Cisco Systems as more than 200 offices in the following countries and regions. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco Web site at wwrw.cisen.com/govattices. Argeotina» Australia» Austria» Begum Brazil «Bulgaria» Canada » Chile» China PRC + Colombia» Costa Rica Croatia + Republic» Denmack «Dubai, UAE + Finland «France « Germany « Gresce + Hong Kong SAR * Hungary India «Indonesia sland sac + lely« Japa + Korea» Luxembourg + Malaysia» Mexico» The Netherlands [New Zealand * Norway «Peru «Philipines «Pond «Portugal» Puro Rio * Romania Russia + Saudi Arabia ‘Scotland + Singapore» Slovakia» Slovenia» South Afia» Spin» Sweden Switzerland» Taiwan + Thailand» Turkoy + Ukraine + United Kingdom «Unita States + Venezuela + Viet + Zimbabwe Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, Ine, Al rights reserved. CCIP, the Ciseo Powered Network mark, the Cisco Systems Verified logo, Cisco Unity, Fallow Me Browsing, FormShare, iQ Breakthrough, iQ Expertise, iQ FastTrack, the iQ logo, iQ Net Readiness Scorecard, Networking Academy, SeriptShare, SMARTaet, TransPath, and Voice LAN are trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc; Changing the Way We Work, Live, Play, and Lear, Discover All That's Possible, The Fastest Way to Increase Your Internet Quotient, and iQuick Study are service marks of Cisco Systems, In. and Aironet, ASIST, BPX, Catalyst, CCDA, CDP, CCIE, CCNA, CNP, Cisco, the Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert logo, Cisco 10S, the Cisco 10S logo, Cisco Press, Cisco Systems, Cisco Systems Capital, the Cisco Systems logo, Empowering the Intemet Generation, Enterprise/Solver, EtherChannel, EtherSwitch, Fast Step, GigaStack, Internet Quotient, IOS, IP/TV, LightStream, MGX, MICA, the Networkers logo, [Network Registrar, Packe, PIX, Post Routing, Pre-Routing, RateMUX, Registrar, SlideCast, StrataView Plus, Stratm, SwitchProbe, TeleRouter, and VCO are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, In. andlor its affiliates in the U.S. and certain other countries. Al oer trademarks mentioned in this document or Web site are the property of ther respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply a partnership relationship between Cisco and any other company. (0208R)Table of Contents Volume 1 Course Introduction 0 Overview 1 Course Objectives 2 Cisco Certifications 4 Learner Skills and Knowledge 5 Leamer Responsibilities 6 General Administration 7 Course Flow Diagram 8 Icons and Symbols 9 Leamer Introductions 40 BGP Overview 108 t Overview 11 Introduction to BGP 8 Overview 13 Interdomain Routing 15 BGP Characteristics 19 Single-Homed Customers 115 Multinomed Customers 117 Transit Autonomous Systems 1-20 BGP Limitations 1-22 Summary 1-23 Quiz: Introduction to BGP 1-25 BGP Session Establishment 00829 Overview 1:29 BGP Neighbor Discovery 1-31 Establishing a BGP Session 1-35 BGP Keepalives, 1-39 MDS Authentication 1-42 Summary 1-43 Quiz: BGP Session Establishment 1-44 Copyright ® 2003, Cisco Systems, In. Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (8GP)¥30 iBGP Route Processing 0A Overview Re Building the BGP Table BGP Route Selection Criteria ing Routing Updates BGP Route Propagation Building the IP Routing Table ‘Advertising Local Networks Automatic Summarization Summary Quiz: BGP Route Processing 147 1-49 1-51 1-53 1-56 1-58 1-60 1-63 1-67 1-68 Basic BGP Configuration 7 Overview BGP Routing Process Configuring External N Configuring BGP Timers Configuring MDS Authentication Announcing Networks in BGP Redistributing Routes into BGP Configuring Classless BGP Aggregating BGP Networks Multihomed Customer Problem Summary Quiz: Basic BGP Configuration wm 1-73 1-75 1-78 1-80 1-82 1-87 1-93 1-98 1-405 1-108 1-110 Monitoring and Troubleshooting BGP 4 Overview Monitoring Overall BGP Routing Monitoring BGP Neighbors Monitoring the BGP Table Debugging BGP BGP Session Startup Problems BGP Neighbor Not Reachable BGP Neighbor Not Configured BGP AS Number Mismatch Summary 1113 1-115 117 1-119 1-122 1-126 1127 1-430 1-432 1134 Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, InLaboratory Exercise: BGP Overview (Initial Lab Setup) Laboratory Exercise: BGP Overview Overview Business Requirements of Multihomed BGP Networks Technical Requirements of Multinomed BGP Networks BGP Route Selection Without Policies Multinomed Customer Routing Policies Influencing BGP Route Selection BGP Filters ‘Summary Laboratory Exercise: Multihomed BGP Networks 241 2413 2415 249 221 ‘AS-Path Filters 02 T Overview AS-Path Filtering Scenarios AS-Path Regular Expressions String Matching Applying AS-Path Filters Configuring BGP AS-Path Filters Monitoring AS-Path Filters ‘Summary Laboratory Exercise: AS-Path Filters. 227 2-29 231 2:33 2-43 244 2-47 2-53 255 Prefix-List Filters 0 2G Overview Requirements for Prefix-Based Filters Prefix-Lists vs. IP Access-Lists Configuring Prefix-Lists BGP Filters Implementation Implementing Prefix-Lists in the BGP Process Modifying Prefix-Lists Monitoring Prefix-Lists ‘Summary Laboratory Exercise: Prefix-List Filters 261 2-63 2-65 2-68 274 2-75 2-80 2-82 2-86 2-88 Copyright © 2009, Cisco Systems, Inc Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0° Route Filter Overview 2.95 Outbound Route Filter 2.97 ‘Outbound Route Filter Message 2-99 Configuring Outbound Route Filtering 2-403 Using Outbound Route Filtering 2-408 Monitoring Outbound Route Filtering 2-108 Summary 2-109 ‘Quiz: Outbound Route Filtering 2-110 Route-Maps as BGP Filters 2-113 Overview 24113 Why Use Route-Maps as BGP Filters? 2415 Route-Maps Overview 2-116 Prefix-List Use in Route-Maps 2421 BGP Filters 2-123 Using Route-Maps as BGP Filters 2124 Monitoring Route-Maps 2-126 ‘Summary 2.431 Quiz: Route-Maps as BGP Filters 2-133 ing in BGP Poli 2137 Overview 2437 Traditional Filtering Limitations 2.139 BGP Soft Reconfiguration 2141 Cisco IOS Commands for Soft Reconfiguration 2-144 Monitoring Soft Reconfiguration 2-148 Route Refresh 2-150 Using Route Refresh 2154 Monitoring Route Refresh 2-156 ‘Summary 2-159 Laboratory Exercise: Implementing Changes in BGP Policy 2-161 Volume 2 Route Selecti r , pi Overview 34 (BGP Path Attributes 8 Overview 33 Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2008, Cisco Systems, Ine,BGP Path Attributes Well-Known BGP Attributes Optional BGP Attributes AS-Path Attribute Next-Hop Attribute ‘Summary Quiz: BGP Path Attributes 35 3-6 340 3-413 3-16 3.21 3-22 Influencing BGP Route Selection with Weights 825 Overview BGP Route Selection Criteria Influencing BGP Route Selection Configuring Per-Neighbor Weights Changing Weights with AS-Path Filters ‘Changing Weights with Route-Maps Monitoring BGP Route Selection and Weights BGP Route Selection and Filtering Tools Summary Summary Laboratory Exercise: Influencing BGP Route Selection with Weights BGP Local Preference 38 Overview Consistent Route Selection Within the AS BGP Local Preference Configuring Default Local Preference Configuring Local Preference with Route-Maps Monitoring Local Preference Summary Laboratory Exercise: BGP Local Preference 3-25 3-27 3-28 3-30 3-35 3-40 3-43 346 347 3-49 355 3.87 3-61 3-64 3-66 3-68 3-73 3-74 AS-Path Prepending 3.79 Overview Return Path Selection in a Multinomed AS. AS-Path Prepending ‘AS-Path Prepending Design Considerations Configuring AS-Path Prepending Monitoring AS-Path Prepending AS-Path Filtering Concerns with AS-Path Prepending 3-79 3-81 3-86 3-90 3-92 3-96 3-98 Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc Configuring BGP on Cisco Rulers (BGP) v3.0Summary 3-101 Quiz: AS-Path Prepending 3-403 BGP Multi-Exit Discriminator HOF Overview 3-407 Selecting the Proper Return Path 3-109 MED Propagation in a BGP Network 3412 ‘Changing Default MED 3-113 Changing MED with Route-Maps 3115 ‘Advanced MED Configuration 3-117 Monitoring MED 3421 Troubleshooting MED 3125 Summary 3-129 Laboratory Exercise: BGP Multi-Exit Discriminator 3-131 BGP Communities 0 Overview 3137 Selecting the Proper Retum Path 3-140 BGP Communities Overview 3-142 Using Communities 3-145 Configuring BGP Communities 3-148 Configuring Route Tagging with BGP Communities 3-150 Configuring Community Propagation 3-153 Defining BGP Community-Lists 3-155 Matching BGP Communities in Route-Maps 3-158 Monitoring Communities 3-161 Summary 3-165 Laboratory Exercise: BGP Communities 3-167 Overview 44 Overview 43 Customer Connectivity Types 45 Redundancy in Customer Connections 47 Customer-to-Provider Routing Schemes 4-12 Customer Routing a4 Addressing Requirements 419 vii Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright ® 2003, Cisco Systems, ne.‘AS Number Allocation 4-23 Summary 4-26 ‘Quiz: Customer-to-Provider Connectivity Requirements 4:28 Implementing Customer Connectivity Using Static Routing ___ 4-34, Overview 431 Why Use Static Routing? 434 Characteristics of Static Routing 436 Designing Static Route Propagation in a Service Provider Network 4.40 Static Route Propagation Case Study Parameters 442 BGP Backup with Static Routes 447 Floating Static Routes with BGP 453 Load Sharing with Static Routes 4-58 ‘Summary 4-63 Quiz: Implementing Customer Connectivity Using Static Routing 4.65 Connecting a Multinomed Customer toa Single Service Provider _4-69 Overview 4-69 Configuring BGP on Multihomed Customer Routers 4-72 Conditional Advertising in Multihomed Customer Networks 476 Configuring BGP on Service Provider Routers 4.79 Removing Private AS Numbers 4-83 Backup Solutions with BGP 487 Load Sharing with the Multinomed Customer 4-90 Load Sharing with BGP Multipath 4-92 Load Sharing with EBGP Multihop 4.94 ‘Summary 498 Quiz: Connecting a Multihomed Customer to a Single Service Provider 4-100 Gonnecting a Multihomed Customer to Multiple Service Providers __4-105 Overview 4105 Configuring BGP for Multihomed Customers 4-108 Multihomed Customer Address Space Selection att Multihomed Customer AS Number Selection 4-112 ‘AS Number Translation 4114 Primary/Backup Link Selection 4-116 BGP Incoming Link Selection 4-118 Load Sharing with Muttiple Providers 4-123 ‘Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, Ine Confguring BGP on Cisco Reuters (BGP) v0 ixSummary 4-125 Quiz: Connecting a Multihomed Customer to Multiple Service Providers 4127 ‘BGP Transit Autonomous Systems 40 Overview 54 ‘Transit Autonomous System Functions Overview 53 Transit Autonomous System Tasks 55 External Route Propagation 56 Internal Route Propagation 5-8 Packet Forwarding in an Autonomous System 59 Core Router IBGP Requirements in a Transit Autonomous System S14 ‘Summary 5-13 Quiz: Transit Autonomous System Functions 514 IBGP and EBGP interaction ina Transit Autonomous System 57 Overview 517 AS-Path Processing in IBGP 519 BGP Split Horizon 5-21 IBGP Full Mesh 5-23 I8GP Neighbors 5-26 IBGP Next-Hop Processing 5:29 Transit Network Using External Next Hops 5:31 Transit Network Using Edge Routers as Next Hops. 5:33 Differences Between EBGP and IBGP Sessions 5:37 Summary 541 Quiz: IBGP and EBGP Interaction in a Transit Autonomous System 5-43 Packet Forwarding in Transit Autonomous Systems 0647 Overview 5-47 Packet Forwarding in a Transit Autonomous System 5-49 Recursive Lookup in Cisco 1OS Software 5-53 Routing Protocols in’a Transit Autonomous System, 5-55 BGP and IGP Interaction 5-58 Problems with BGP and IGP Interaction 5-61 ‘Summary 5-62 Quiz: Packet Forwarding in Transit Autonomous Systems 5-63 Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2008, Cisco Systems, IneConfiguring a Transit Autonomous System 5 67 Overview Configuring |BGP Neighbors Configuring IBGP Sessions Between Loopback Interfaces Configuring BGP Synchronization Changing the Administrative Distance of BGP Routes Scalability Limitations of IBGP-Based Transit Backbones Summary ‘Quiz: Configuring a Transit Autonomous System 5-67 5-69 5-74 5-73 5-75 5-77 5-79 5-80 Monitoring and Troubleshooting ISGP in Transit Autonomous Systems __5-83, Overview Monitoring IBGP Common IBGP Problems Troubleshooting IBGP Session Startup Issues Troubleshooting IBGP Route Selection Issues Troubleshooting IBGP Synchronization Issues ‘Summary Laboratory Exercise: BGP Transit Autonomous Systems Volume 3 5-83 5-85 5-90 5.93 5.95 5-97 ‘Scaling Service Provider Networks 0 Overview 64 Scaling IGP and BGP in Service P Overview ‘Common Service Provider Network Route Propagation in Service Provider Networks Scaling Service Provider Routing Protocols Scaling Service Provider Addressing ‘Summary Quiz: Scaling IGP and BGP in Service Provider Networks Introduction to Route Reflectors 025 Overview IBGP Scalability Issues in a Transit AS Route Reflector Split-Horizon Rules Redundant Route Reflectors Route Reflector Clusters 63 65 6-10 6-15 6-19 6-22 6-23 6-25 6-27 6-29 6-33 6-35 Copyright © 2008, Cisco Systems, nc Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0Additional Route Reflector Loop Prevention Mechanisms 6-38 ‘Summary 6-40 Quiz: Introduction to Route Reflectors: 641 ‘Network Design with Route Reflectors GAS Overview 6-45 Network Design with Route Reflectors 6-47 Potential Network Issues 6-51 Hierarchical Route Reflectors 6-53 Summary 6-55 Quiz: Network Design with Route Reflectors 6-56 Confiaur On ene ney Overview 6-59 Route Reflector Backbone Migration 6-61 Configuring Route Reflectors 6-63 Monitoring Route Reflectors 6-67 Summary 671 Laboratory Exercise: BGP Route Reflectors 6-72 Introduction to Confederations 77 Overview 6-77 IBGP Transit AS Problems 6-79 Splitting a Transit AS with BGP Confederations 681 AS-Path Propagation Within the BGP Confederation 6-83 AS-Path Processing in BGP Confederations. 6-86 Intraconfederation EBGP Session Properties 6-88 ‘Summary 6-90 Quiz: Introduction to Confederations 691 A ina. . 95 Overview 6-95 BGP Confederation Design Rules 6-97 Planning BGP Confederations 6-99 Configuring BGP Confederations 6-101 Monitoring BGP Confederations 6-107 ‘Summary 6-112 Laboratory Exercise: BGP Confederations 6-113 CContiguing BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, neP Scalabili . Overview 7A Improving BGP Convergence Overview 73 BGP Convergence 76 BGP Processes 78 CPU Effects of BGP Processes 7-40 Improving BGP Convergence TAB Path MTU Discovery TAT Increasing Input Queue Depth 7-20 BGP Scan Time 724 BGP Advertisement Interval TT ‘Summary 7-30 Quiz: Improving BGP Convergence 7-32 fo {Prefixes R froma BGP zat Overview 7-37 Limiting the Number of Routes Received from a Neighbor 7-39 Configuring the BGP Maximum-Prefix Function Tat Monitoring the BGP Maximum-Prefix Function 7-43 ‘Summary TAT Laboratory Exercise: Limiting the Number of Prefixes Received from a BGP Neighbor 7-48 BGP Peer Groups Overview 7-55 Peer Group Requirements 7-57 Peer Groups as a BGP Performance Too! 7-62 &GP Peer Group Limitations 7-64 BGP Peer Groups in Cisco IOS Software 7-66 Configuring Peer Groups 7-68 Monitoring Peer Groups 7-75 ‘Summary 7-80 Laboratory Exercise: BGP Peer Groups 7-82 BGP Route Dampening BT Overview 7-87 BGP Route Dampening 7-89 Route-Dampening Operation 7-91 Conysght © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. Configuring BGP an Gieco Routers (8GP}¥30 xiConfiguring BGP Route Dampening Releasing Dampened Routes Monitoring Route Dampening Summary Laboratory Exercise: BGP Route Dampening Answer Key A Practice Items AS Module 1: BGP Overview Module 2: Route Selection Using Policy Controls Module 3: Route Selection Using Attributes Module 4: Customer-to-Provider Connectivity with BGP. Module 5: 8GP Transit Autonomous Systems Module 6: Scaling Service Provider Networks Module 7: Optimizing BGP Scalability AS Ag A37 ASS A-69 A81 A905 Lesson Assessment Solutions AT Module 1: BGP Overview Module 2: Route Selection Using Policy Controls Module 3: Route Selection Using Attributes Module 4: Customer-to-Provider Connectivity with BGP Module 5: BGP Transit Autonomous Systems Module 6: Scaling Service Provider Networks Module 7: Optimizing BGP Scalability A107 ANS 7-119 A123 A135 A143 A151 ee 155 Module 1: BGP Overview Module 2: Route Selection Using Policy Controls Module 3: Route Selection Using Attributes Module 5: BGP Transit Autonomous Systems Module 6: Scaling Service Provider Networks Module 7: Optimizing BGP Scalability A155 A159 A163 A167 A169 MATS Gourse Glossary BL Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. Scaling Service Provider Networks Overview Common to every service provider network are concems over network scalability, specifically when the network supports both internal applications and customer connectivity. When interior and exterior routing protocols are deployed in large, complex service provider networks, protocol interaction, interior gateway protocol (IGP) choice, and addressing are common concerns. Proper scaling of Internal Border Gateway Protocol (IBGP) within the service provider network is also an area of concern, In standard Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) implementations, all BGP routers within an autonomous system (AS) must be fully meshed so that all external routing information can be distributed among the other routers residing within the AS. Therefore, within an AS, all routers must establish TCP sessions with all other BGP routers. As the AS grows, scalability challenges arise because of an ever-increasing number of TCP sessions and demands for router CPU and memory resources. This module discusses network scalability concems that are common to large, complex service provider networks. The module also discusses BGP route reflectors and confederations as scalability mechanisms that allow network designers to steer away from BGP full-mesh requirements and improve network scalability by reducing the number of TCP sessions required within an AS. Also discussed in this module are the Cisco IOS” commands needed to configure and monitor BGP route reflectors and confederations, Upon completing this module, you will be able to: = Describe common routing scalability concems in service provider networks = Describe the function and operation of route reflectors in a BGP environment = Describe the concept of hierarchical route reflectors and their requirements, based upon established route reflector design rulesOutline = Configure and verify proper operation of route reflectors to modify IBGP split-horizon rules, given an existing IBGP network = Describe the function and operation of confederations in a BGP environment "= Configure and verify proper operation of confederations to modify IBGP AS-path processing, given an existing [BGP network ‘The module contains these lessons: = Scaling IGP and BGP in Service Provider Networks Introduction to Route Reflectors m= Network Design with Route Reflectors = Configuring and Monitoring Route Reflectors = Introduction to Confederations = Configuring and Monitoring Confederations 62 Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2009, Cisco Systems, Inc.Scaling IGP and BGP in Service Provider Networks Overview Common to every service provider network are concerns about network scalability, The interactions between interior gateway protocols (IGPs) and the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), specifically when supporting internal routing, customer connectivity, and transit traffic (and the administrative policies that match), can be quite complex. Furthermore, the large number of prefixes required to support full Internet routing requires network administrators to fully characterize IGP and BGP interactions for intemal networks and customers alike, This lesson discusses network scalability concerns common to large, complex service provider networks. Included in this lesson is a description of a typical service provider network, and. discussion of the propagation of internal and customer routing information, scaling considerations for IGPs and BGP, and scaling of IP addressing in service provider networks, Importance Properly scaling IP addressing, IGPs, and BGP is a common area of concer to all service providers and can be the difference between a successful and a problematic BGP implementation. Because service provider networks are complex and must meet the administrative policy and routing demands of the internal network, different customers, and other providers, proper scaling is crucial to the success of the networkObjectives Upon completing this lesson, you will be able to: = Describe the basic structure of service provider networks ‘© Describe the propagation of internal and customer routes in service provider networks ‘= Describe proper scaling of IGPs and BGP in service provider networks = Describe IP addressing scaling issues in service provider networks Leamer Skills and Knowledge Outline To fully benefit from this lesson, you must have these prerequisite skills and knowledge: = BGP Overview module = BGP Transit Autonomous Systems module ‘This lesson includes these topics: = Overview = Common Service Provider Network = Route Propagation in Service Provider Networks ing Service Provider Routing Protocols Scaling Service Provider Addressing = Summary = Assessment (Quiz): Scaling IGP and BGP in Service Provider Networks 64 Configuring BGP on Cisco Roviers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2009, Cisco Systems, In.Common Service Provider Network This topic describes the basic structure of service provider networks. Common Service Provider Network + Runs BGP or static routing with customer + Exchanges routes with other service providers via BGP » Runs IBGP between own BGP speakers + Runs one instance of IGP (OSPF or IS-IS) IGP used for internal routes only ‘The common service provider network runs Extemal Border Gateway Protocol (EBGP) or static routing with customers, EBGP is always used as the routing protocol between different service providers. Internal Border Gateway Protocol (IBGP) is required in the provider network because all EBGP speaking routers in an autonomous system (AS) must exchange external routes via IBGP. Also non-EBGP speakers are required to take part in the IBGP exchange if they are in a transit path and forward packets based on destination IP addresses. The service provider network also runs an IGP. The protocols of choice are Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Intermediate System-to- Intermediate System (IS-1S). The IGP is used for two purposes: = Provides IP connectivity between all IBGP speakers so that TCP sessions for IBGP can be established between BGP speaking routers = Provides optimal routing to the BGP next-hop address A single IGP should be used within the entire AS. This setup facilitates effective packet forwarding from the ingress router to egress routers. The IGP is configured to carry intemal routes only, including internal links and loopback addresses of the routers. However, for performance and scalability reasons, no customer routes or external routes should be injected into the IGP. Copyright © 2008, Cisco Systems, Inc. Scaling Sonice Provider Networks 6-5Common Service Provider Network (Cont.) Tmo tam The typical service provider network consists of a network core that connects various edge devices. Some of the edge devices connect customers; others connect to other service providers The edge devices connecting to other service providers use EBGP to exchange routing information. The edge devices connecting customers use either static routing or EBGP, Unless Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is configured on the service provider backbone, routers in a transit path are also required to have full routing information, Therefore, these routers take part in the IBGP routing exchange. An IGP is also required within the service provider network. The IGP is used to carry internal routes, including the loopback interface addresses of IBGP-speaking routers. The IGP provides reachability information to establish IBGP sessions and to perform the recursive routing lookup for the BGP next hop. 65 Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2008, Cisco Systems, IncCommon Service Provider Network (Cont.) TTT Tes cai POPS + Networks are divided into points of presence (POPs) Different types of media are concentrated at the POP + Optimal routing between POPs is desired Service provider devices that connect access links to customers are physically located in groups, called points of presence (POPs). In general, the POP is a group of routers where access links are terminated. The edge routers peering with other service providers can in this sense be considered a POP. Service providers use different types of access links with different types of customers and usually mix access links in the same POP. Some customers use leased lines, others use xDSL, and still others use dial-in access or any other access that the provider can support. POP routers connect to the network core using a layer of concentration routers at the POP. The network core forwards packets between POPs, different customer access points, or peering points with other service providers. Optimal routing between POPs is a desirable feature. CConyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, ine. Scaling Service Provider Networks 67Common Service Provider Network (Cont.) Pi SRE SE Gaocom + POP routers use BGP or static routing with customer routers + Provider core IGP is a single instance of ISS or OSPF + The core IGP is used only within the service provider backbone Customer access lines terminate in the POP edge routers. In many cases, the POP edge routers use static routing to customer networks. The POP edge routers advertise static routes to the rest of the service provider network and to other autonomous systems using BGP. Service providers use BGP routing with the customer when redundancy requires the use of a routing protocol. ‘The service provider backbone typically uses a single instance of either IS-IS or OSPF as its IGP. The IGP is used within the provider backbone only, The provider backbone exchanges no IGP routing information with customer routers or with routers in other autonomous systems. 68 ‘Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2008, Cisco Systems, Inc.Practice Qn 2) How is routing information exchanged between the service provider and other autonomous systems? A) IBGP B) EBGP ©) static routes D) with an IGP In what two ways is routing information typically exchanged between a service provider and its customers? (Choose two.) A) IBGP B) — EBGP ©) static routes D) with an IGP ‘Copyright© 2009, Cisco Systems, nc. ‘Scaling Service Provider Networks 69Route Propagation in Service Provider Networks This topic describes the propagation of internal and customer routes in service provider networks. Route Propagation in Service Provider Networks _ caeeom + BGP Route Propagation — BGP carries customer routes —BGP carries other provider routes + IGP Route Propagation -IGP responsible only for next hop + Do not redistribute BGP into IGP ~ IGP performance and convergence time suffer if large number of routes are carried - No IGP is capable of carrying full Internet routes Full Internet routing table has exceeded 110,000 routes It is important to avoid sending any unnecessary routing information in the IGP. The IGP performs best if it carries as few routes as possible. Optimally, the IGP should contain only information about BGP next hops and routes intemal to the service provider network, enabling the establishment of IBGP sessions. All other routing information should be carried in BGP, which is designed to scale for large volumes of routing information. Customer routes and the routes from other service providers should be carried in BGP. These routes should not be propagated from BGP into the provider IGP, IGP performance and convergence time suffer if IGP carries a larger number of routes. The design goal should be to minimize the volume of routing information carried by the IGP. Naturally, the number of route flaps is also reduced as the number of routes is reduced. BGP scales to a much larger volume of routing information due to the inherent qualities of the design of BGP, Potentially, the BGP routers of the service provider could receive the full Internet routing table, which has exceeded 110,000 routes. You should therefore never redistribute the routing information received by BGP into the IGP, because no IGP is capable of carrying several tens of thousands of routes. 6-10 Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyiight © 2008, Cisco Systems, ncRouting Information Exchange with Other Service Providers ATT —Cisea com las zie ali es fe + BGP is used to exchange routing information between Internet service providers Provider edge routers use BGP to exchange routing information with other service provider networks for redundancy and scalability reasons. Static routing with other service providers is generally not a viable solution due to the dynamic routing requirements of the service provider environment, Routing information is received at provider edge routers using EBGP and then propagated using IBGP to the rest of the service provider network. At another edge router, the routing information is further propagated to a different service provider using EBGP with other autonomous systems Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc Scaling Service Provider Networks 6-11Routing Information Exchange with Customers Tras cam + The provider edge router redistributes static customer routes into BGP » BGP carries customer routes The provider edge router typically uses static routing to reach customer networks. In this case, the customer typically configures a static default route pointing to the edge router of the service provider. ‘The provider edge router redistributes customer static routes into BGP. The service provider network then uses BGP to propagate the information to the rest of the service provider network using IBGP. The service provider also advertises customer routing information to other autonomous systems using B 612 Configuring BGP on Cisco Rovters (BGP) v3.0, ‘Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc.+ The core IGP of the service provider should carry information only about backbone links and loopback addresses ‘The IGP used in the service provider core should carry information only about backbone links and loopback addresses. The service provider should use BGP to carry all other information. Use BGP next-hop-self when BGP routing is exchanged with the customer or other service providers. Using next-hop-self results in the BGP next hop being set to the loopback address of the service provider edge router and not to the access link address of the customer. The IGP can then be relieved from the burden of carrying information about the access link. The benefit of not carrying customer link information is that a flapping access link will not disturb the service provider IGP. Copyright © 2003, Cisoo Systems, Ine ‘Scaling Service Providor Networks 613,Practice Qn Q2) ‘What would be the impact of redistributing BGP into the provider IGP? A) B) ° D) ‘The transit backbone would stop functioning because all IGPs have smaller administrative distances than IBGP. Convergence times would improve because IGPs have faster convergence and smaller advertisement intervals than BGP. Unbounded, the large number of routes carried in BGP would exceed the scalability of any IGP. ‘There is little to no impact when redistributing BGP routes into the provider IGP. What benefit is gained if links to customer networks are not advertised in the IGP at the provider edge router? A) B) ° D) IGP performance will increase because the IGP will carry fewer routes. Security is improved because the provider network will hide the customer network. Route summarization is easier because the IGP will carry fewer routes. A flapping link between the customer and the provider will not affect the stability of the provider IGP. 6-14 Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (8GP) v3.0 Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, IncScaling Service Provider Routing Protocols This topic describes proper scaling of IGPs and BGP in service provider networks. Scaling Service Provider Routing Protocols IGP Responsibilities + Carry route to BGP next hop + Provide optimal path to the next hop + Converge to alternate path so that the BGP peering is maintained BGP Responsibilities + BGP update generation + Scaling BGP policies + Scaling IBGP mesh + Reducing impact of flapping routes ‘The IGP is responsible for: = Carrying routes to the BGP next hops to facilitate recursive routing = Providing an optimal path to the next hop, thereby optimizing packet flow toward all BGP destinations Converging to an altemate path in the case of lost links or routers in a redundant network; convergence should be quick so that BGP sessions are not lost The BGP is responsible for: = Generating BGP updates about reachable and unreachable networks = Implementing and scaling the BGP routing policy, which can be quite cumbersome in large service provider networks with many EBGP-speaking routers = Implementing and scaling IBGP sessions between all BGP-speaking routers in the AS = Reducing the impact of individual flapping routes through route summarization Copyright © 2008, Cisco Systems, Inc. Scaling Service Provider Networks 6-15Scaling Service Provider Routing Protocols (Cont.) Scaling IGP * Loopbacks and internal links carried only + Good addressing structure within the POP required + Loopback addresses taken out of a different address, space and not summarized + Summarization of internal link addresses on POP level + Optimal routes to loopbacks needed only (with proper summarization) In scaling an IGP, itis important to limit the number of routes carried by the IGP. Optimally, the IGP carries only loopback interfaces and internal links. ‘The number of routes carried by the IGP can be even further reduced with route summarization. However, care must be taken because loopback addresses should never be summarized, Route summarization always introduces the risk of suboptimal routing and should be carefully planned, because it is important that recursive routing lookup always use optimal routing to the next hop. Also, in an MPLS environment, a label switched path (LSP) must be unbroken between edge routers, and summarizing loopback interfaces will break the LSP. Internal links ean always be summarized because they are not used as BGP next-hop addresses. ‘To facilitate proper route summarization, internal links and loopback inter should be assigned addresses from two different address spaces. Also, a router’s internal links should be assigned addresses depending upon which POP they belong to. es on a router If implemented correctly, all internal router links in one POP could be summarized at the POP level and injected into the core as a single route, But, all router loopback addresses within the POP are still propagated into the core as individual host routes, giving optimal routing to all loopback interfaces, 616 Configuring BGP on Cisco Routers (BGP) v3.0 Copyright © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc