Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. A
Solution:
Cost of sales of Parent 300,000
Cost of sales of Subsidiary 220,000
Less: Intercompany sales during the yr. (see prev. sol’n) (64,000)
Add: Unrealized profit in ending inventory (squeeze) 6,000
Less: Realized profit in beginning inventory -
Add: Depreciation of FVA on inventory -
Consolidated cost of sales 462,000
3. C
Solution:
Cost of sales of Parent 400,000
Cost of sales of Subsidiary 350,000
Less: Intercompany sales during the yr. (250,000)
Add: Unrealized profit in ending inventory -*
Less: Realized profit in beginning inventory -
Add: Depreciation of FVA on inventory -
Consolidated cost of sales 500,000
*All the inventory were sold to third parties during the year.
4. C
Solution:
Ending inventory of Banks Co. (175,000 + 60,000) 235,000
Ending inventory of Lamm Co. 250,000
Less: Unrealized profit in EI (50,000 x 60,000/200,000) (15,000)
Consolidated ending inventory 470,000
5. B
Solution:
Kidd's net assets at fair value – Dec. 31, 1994 (180K – 60K) 120,000
Multiply by: NCI percentage 25%
Total 30,000
Add: Goodwill to NCI net of accumulated impairment losses -
Non-controlling interest in net assets – Dec. 31, 1994 30,000
7. B – same as parent dividends paid, since dividends paid by sub (Kidd) are 100% eliminated in consolidation.
Interco. dividends paid by Kidd to Pare (5,000 x .75 = 3,750) should be eliminated.
The dividends paid to the non-controlling shareholders (5,000 x .25 = 1,250) would decrease their non-controlling interest.
8. D
Solution:
Saul's net assets at fair value – 12/31/20x9 (6M+ 550K–165K) 6,385,000
Multiply by: NCI percentage 20%
Total 1,277,000
Add: Goodwill to NCI net of accumulated impairment losses* 50,000
Non-controlling interest in net assets – 12/31/20x9 1,327,000
9. C
Solution:
Total consolidated current assets before elimination 320,000
Unrealized profit on purchases from Kent (48K x 60/240) (12,000)
Consolidated current assets 308,000
No elimination is made on the transaction with Dean because Clark does not control Dean, and therefore, Dean is not consolidated.
10. A
Solution:
The gain pertains to the owners of the parent only because the issuer of the bonds is the parent. Therefore, the transaction does
not affect NCI.
KEY ANSWERS TO ASSIGNEMENT - MCQ for Consolidated FS, Part 4
1. A – 1,240,000 - If the investment in subsidiary is measured under the equity method, the consolidated retained earnings is
equal to the parent’s retained earnings.
2. C
Solution:
Retained earnings – Subsidiary
36,000 1/1/1991
Dividends 5,000 20,000 Profit (squeeze)
51,000
3. A
Solution:
Investment in subsidiary
Initial cost (squeeze) 120,000
Sh. in profit of Sub. 16,000 4,000(a) Dividends received
Share in the amortization of undervaluation of
- assets (b)
132,000 Dec. 31, 20x1
(a)
(5,000 x 80%) = 4,000
4. D
Solution:
Consideration transferred 120,000
Non-controlling interest in the acquiree (100K x 20%) 20,000
Previously held equity interest in the acquiree -
Total 140,000
Fair value of net identifiable assets acquired (100,000)
Goodwill at acquisition date 40,000
Accumulated impairment losses since acquisition date -
Goodwill, net – current year 40,000
7. A
Solution:
1. B Penn controls Sell; Sell controls Vane; Therefore, Penn controls Vane too.
2. D - Since S1 already holds controlling interest in S2 when P acquired S1, the acquisition date for both S1 and S2
is on January 1, 20x3.
3. D
4. E - Since S1 acquires S2 only after P acquired S1, the acquisition dates are: (a) January 1, 20x1 for S1 and (b)
January 1, 20x3 for S2.
5. E
6. C
Ownership over S2
Direct holdings of P in S2 0%
Indirect holdings of P in S2 (80% x 60%)* 48%
Total holdings of P in S2 48%
NCI in S2 (squeeze) 52%
Total 100%
*The indirect holdings of P in S2 is computed by multiplying P’s interest in S1 (80%) by S1’s interest in S2 (60%).
Although the computed total holdings of P is only 48%, i.e., less than 50%, it is still presumed that there is control
because P controls S1, who in turn controls S2. In substance, it is actually P who has control over S2. This is not
unusual in practice. The computation is made only for purposes of mathematical computations during consolidation
procedures.
An indirect holding adjustment is made because the consideration transferred to S2 is not wholly made by P but
rather partly by P (80%) and partly by S1 (20%). Only the portion effectively transferred by P (₱200,000 x 80% = ₱160,000)
enters into the computation of goodwill.
The indirect holding adjustment affects both the computations of goodwill and NCI.
Since the NCI’s are measured at fair value, there must be goodwill attributable to the NCI’s. These are computed as
follows:
Formula #2: S1 S2
Consideration transferred (given) 400,000 200,000
Indirect holding adjustment (40,000)
Less: Prev. held equity interest in the acquiree - -
Total 400,000 160,000
Less: P's proportionate sh. in net assets of S1 & S2
(₱440,000 x 80%) & (₱240,000 x 48%) (352,000) (115,200)
Goodwill attributable to owners of P – Jan. 1, 20x1 48,000 44,800
Less: P’s share in goodwill impairment
(₱12,000 x 80%) & (₱16,000 x 48%) (9,600) (7,680)
Goodwill attributable to owners of P – Dec. 31, 20x1 38,400 37,120
Notice that the only difference in the goodwill and NCI computations between a simple group structure and a complex group
structure is the indirect holding adjustment.
Ownership over S2
Direct holdings of P in S2 0%
Indirect holdings of P in S2 (80% x 60%) 48%
Total holdings of P in S2 48%
NCI in S2 (squeeze) 52%
Total 100%
The acquisition dates of the subsidiaries are January 1, 20x1 for S1 and December 31, 20x1 for S2. Goodwill and
NCI on each of S1 and S2 shall be computed separately on their respective acquisition dates. Their pre-acquisition
and post-acquisition reserves are also calculated from these dates.
None of S2’s profit is included in the 20x1 consolidated financial statements because S2 was acquired only on
December 31, 20x1.
Ownership over S2
Direct holdings of P in S2 25%
Indirect holdings of P through S1 (80% x 30%) 24%
Total holdings of P in S2 49%
NCI in S2 (squeeze) 51%
Total 100%
A
80% 20%
25% B E
C 30%
40%
A, B and C belong to a D-shaped (mixed) group structure. Therefore, B and C are subsidiaries of A.
Although C is an associate of B, B’s share in C’s profit is not included in the computations above because C is a
member of the group, and is therefore accounted for under the ‘acquisition method.’ Only D and E are accounted for
under the ‘equity method.’
B C Total
Investment in associate D (purchase cost) 320,000
Investment in associate E (purchase cost) 240,000
Share in associate's profits 9,600 12,800
Investments in associates (adjusted) 249,600 332,800 582,400
B C
Retained earnings - 12/31/x1 (unadjusted) 208,000 112,000
Share in associate's profits 9,600 12,800
Retained earnings - 12/31/x1 (adjusted) 217,600 124,800