Professional Documents
Culture Documents
, Cairo, Egypt
27(3), 1895-1908, 2019
Website: http://ajs.journals.ekb.eg
1895
Table 2. Total phenol, total flavonoid contents and scavenging activity of juice concentrate (Syrup)
from sweet sorghum and sugarcane
Bioactive compounds (phenolic and flavonoid the examined extracts contained specific amounts
compounds) existing in different sweet sor- of polyphenol and flavonoid compounds, proving
ghum and sugarcane syrups them to be perfect sources of antioxidants. The
variation in flavonoid content might be due to dif-
Data in Table (3) illustrated that, Rex variety ferent techniques of extraction and processing that
recorded the highest content of almost phenolic might affect the antioxidant capacity measured in
compounds and all flavonoid compounds. Among different materials also genetic factors, different
sugarcane samples, pyrogallol, chlorogenic, e- environmental conditions, stage of maturity, culti-
vanilic, ferulic and ellagic were predominant in G.T var or varietals differences, soil fertilization and the
54.9 sugarcane syrup (469.49, 59.90, 88.70, 53.90 part of the plant used, amongst other factors that
and 56.86, respectively). On contrary commercial affect quantitative variation in these phytochemi-
sugarcane sample exhibited the lowest content of cals (Herrman, 1976).
phenolic content. The increase in phenolic content
might be due to the effect of high temperature that Body weight gain of rats as affected by syrup
accelerate concentration of solids including higher of sweet sorghum and sugarcane and/or cad-
content of phenolic substances meanwhile, the mium acetate
high content of ferulic acids probably due to the
degradation of lignin and hemicellulose materials.
While the degradation of the hydroxyl cinnamic Data in Fig. (1) illustrated that the differentia-
acid derivatives during concentration process led tion of initial body weight among rat groups. The
to an increase in benzoic acid. These results are in highest body weight was recorded by group III,
harmony with Payet et al (2006). followed by Group I then Group IV and Group II
Regarding flavonoid content of different syrup (162.40, 158.20, 146.60 and 144.60 g, respective-
samples, data Table (3) cleared that flavonoid ly). During experiment duration, it was noticed that,
compounds were increased after concentration, body weight gain non significantly (p>0.05) differed
the dominant flavonoids in Rex syrup were nar- by treatments. These results may be due to the
ingin (110.6 ppm), hisperdin (47.35 ppm), hispertin stress that roughly reduce food intake consequent-
(46.31 ppm), rosmarinic (37.30 ppm) and querce- ly body weight Martı´ et al (1994) or stress levels,
trin (21.36 ppm), respectively. As shown in Table genetics, amount of sleep that led to sudden
(3) in spite of low flavonoid content recorded by change in calorie and weight-loss formula. Mean-
G.T. 54-9 sugarcane syrup but it exhibited a higher while, the effect of time was significant (p≤0.05)
content of naringin and quercetin (236.53 and 4.66 among all treatments, where body weight gain de-
ppm, respectively). On contrary, commercial sug- creased as time increased among all treatments.
arcane syrup exhibited the highest content of his- These results probably due to exposure to stress
perdin (263.08 ppm), narengenin (159.95 ppm), that induce reduction in body weight that can con-
rutin (104.63 ppm), hispertin (92.26 ppm), querce- tinue even if the food intake returned to normal
trin (54.93 ppm), kampherol (28.42 ppm) and ape- condition. These results are in harmony with Val-
gnin (3.04 ppm). Finally, the results indicated that le`s et al (2000).
Table 3. Fractionation of bioactive compounds (ppm) in sweet sorghum and sugarcane juice concen-
trates (Syrups)
180
160
weight of rats gain(g)
140
120
100 Group I
80 Group II
60
Group III
40
20 Group IV
0
Initial weight 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Experment duration by Week
Fig. 1. Body weight gain (g) of rat’s as affected by syrup of sweet sorghum and sugarcane and/or cadmi-
um acetate during experiment duration (one month)
Table 4. Absolute and relative weight of rat’s organs as affected by syrup of sweet sorghum and
sugarcane and/or cadmium acetate
Liver and Kidney function of rats as affected by All these mentioned changes were significantly
syrup of sweet sorghum and sugarcane and/or (P≤0.05) reduced to normal control rats upon
cadmium acetate sweet sorghum and sugarcane syrup treatments
during cadmium acetate toxicities in rats (Group III
Results in Table (5) revealed the functions of and Group IV).
liver by measuring the activity of serum enzymes Same findings were observed regarding both
i.e. aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine urea and creatinine presented in Table (5). But all
transaminase (ALT). these conditions were reversed back near to nor-
Cadmium acetate intoxication produced a sig- mal in sweet sorghum and sugarcane syrup treat-
nificant (P≤0.05) elevation of serum liver enzymes, ed rats (Group III and Group IV) when compared to
ALT, AST compared to control rats 73.25, 84.00 control rats. These results are in harmony with that
and 31.75, 35.25 IU/ml, respectively. Generally, obtained by (Khan et al 2018). The normal serum
ALT, AST enzymes increased under liver damage creatinine level was found to be 0.5 to 1.0 mg/dL
Hung et al (2006). ALT and AST considered as according to daily diet and activity as mentioned by
specific marker enzymes that elevated under cad- Hamilton et al (1972).
mium acetate induced toxicity Kowalczyk et al
(2003).
Table 5. Liver and Kidney function of rats as affected by syrup of sweet sorghum and sugarcane and/or
cadmium acetate
Group IV b b b ab
33.75 34.50 42.88 0.55
Where: Group I: control group; Group II: cadmium treated group; Group III: sweet sorghum (500ppm) syrup solution and
cadmium-treated group; Group IV: sugarcane (500 ppm) syrup solution and cadmium-treated group
- Means with different letters within each column are significantly different at (p≤0.05)
-ALT= Alanine aminotransaminase; AST= Aspartate aminotransaminase
Oxidative stress biomarkers of rats as affected As for malondialdehyde results, it could be not-
by syrup of sweet sorghum and sugarcane ed that malondialdehyde level in rats treated with
and/or cadmium acetate cadmium was significantly (P≤0.05) higher than
that in control rats 245.68 and 167.25 nmol/g tis-
The level of antioxidant enzymes and bi- sue, respectively. These results point out that pro-
omarkers in rat livers like reduced glutathione, cat- duction of oxygen free radicals in rats increased.
alase and malondialdehyde in normal, cadmium Also, it could be noticed that conditions were re-
acetate treated, sweet sorghum and sugarcane versed near to normal in sweet sorghum and sug-
treated rats are illustrated in Table (6). Results arcane syrups treated (Group III and Group IV) rats
showed that the activity of reduced glutathione and when compared to control rats. These results are
catalase enzymes were significantly (P≤0.05) de- in harmony with those obtained by Abbassy et al
creased in cadmium acetate group, the decrease (2014).
is probably due to irreversible damage of the en- In general, it was found that treatment with
zyme by reactive oxygen species- i.e. peroxides, sweet sorghum and sugarcane syrups reduced the
superoxide and hydroxyl radical- produced as a cadmium acetate induced hepatotoxicity and lipid
result of stress. The levels of antioxidant enzymes peroxidation in rats. This might be due to presence
returned near to normal in rats treated with sweet of low molecular weight compounds such as poly-
sorghum and sugarcane syrups. phenols that can interrupt the propagation of free
radical reactions and stop lipid peroxidation chain
reaction Acworth et al (1997).
Table 6. Oxidative stress biomarkers of rat’s liver as affected by syrup of sweet sorghum and
sugarcane and/or cadmium acetate
Where: Group I: control group; Group II: cadmium treated group; Group III: sweet sorghum (500
ppm) syrup solution and cadmium-treated group; Group IV: sugarcane (500 ppm) syrup solution
and cadmium-treated group
- Means with different letters within each column are significantly different at (p≤0.05)
Lipid profile of rats as affected by syrup of oxidant and antioxidant which led to disease ex-
sweet sorghum and sugarcane and/or cadmium pansion, cell damage, in convenient biological re-
acetate actions. These results indicated that oral admin-
istration of cadmium significantly affected the ad-
Data in Table (7) pointed out that after one verse metabolic effects in rats after one month.
month experimental period, cadmium treatment The results agreed with Olisekodiaka et al (2012).
significantly (P≤0.05) increased the serum levels of On the other hand, treatment with sweet sor-
total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipopro- ghum and sugarcane syrups (Group III and Group
tein cholesterol while serum high density lipopro- IV) led to reduction of total cholesterol, triglycer-
tein cholesterol significantly (P≤0.05) decreased ides, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and serum
compared to other groups. These results may be high density lipoprotein cholesterol back near to
due to oxidative stress induced by cadmium normal levels when compared to control group.
acetate that led to a disorder in the balance of pro-
Table 7. Lipid Profile of rats as affected by syrup of sweet sorghum and sugarcane and/or cadmium
acetate
Where: Group I: control group; Group II: cadmium treated group; Group III: sweet sorghum (500 ppm) syrup
solution and cadmium-treated group; Group IV: sugarcane (500 ppm) syrup solution and cadmium-treated
group
- Means with different letters within each column are significantly different at (p≤0.05)
-HDL-C: High-Density Lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-Density Lipoprotein cholesterol.
out use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin. as Natural Sweetener for Glazed Tamarind
Chem. 18(6), 499-502. Candy. Int. J. Nutr. Sci. 3(2), 1023-1027.
Hamilton R.W., Gardner L.B., Penn A.S. and Lopez-Virella M.F., Stone P., Ellis S. and Col-
Goldberg M. 1972. Acute tubular necrosis well J.A. 1977. Cholesterol determination in
caused by exercise-induced myoglobinuria. An- high-density lipoproteins separated by three dif-
nals of Internal Medicine. 77(1), 77-82. ferent methods. Clin. Chem. 23(5), 882-884.
Henry R.J. 1974. Creatinine Measurements with Makori E. 2013.The Potential of Sweet Sorghum
Colorimetric Method: Clinical Chemical Princi- [Sorghum Bicolor (L.)Moench] As A Bio- Re-
ples and Techniques, Vol. 525, Harper and source for Syrup and Ethanol Production in
Row Publishers, New York, USA, 2 nd Ed. pp. Kenya. M. Sc. thesis. Jomo Kenyatta Univ. of
549-550. Agric. and Technology, 53 p.
Herrmann K. 1976. Flavonol and flavones in food Martı´ O., Martı´ J. and Armario A. 1994. Effects
plants: a review. J. of Food Technology 11, of chronic stress on food intake in rats: influence
433-448. of stressor intensity and duration of daily expo-
Hung D.Y., Siebert G.A., Chang P., Whitehouse sure. Physiol. Behav. 55(4), 747-753.
M.W., Fletcher L., Crawford D.H.G. and Rob- Ohkawa H., Ohishi W. and Yagi K. 1979. Assay
erts M.S. 2006. Hepatic pharmacokinetics of for lipid peroxidation in animal tissues by thio-
propranolol in rats with adjuvant – induced sys- barbituric acid reaction. Analytical Biochemis-
temic inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastroin- try. 95(2), 351-358.
test Liver Physiol. 290, G343-G351. Olisekodiaka M.J., Igbeneghu C.A., Onuegbu
Ivanova V., Stefova M. and Chinnici F. 2010. A.J., Oduru R. and Lawal A.O. 2012. Lipid, lip-
Determination of the polyphenol contents in oproteins, total antioxidant status and organ
Macedonian grapes and wines by standardized changes in rats administered high doses of
spectrophotometric methods. J. Serb. Chem. cadmium chloride. Medical Principles and
Soc. 75(1), 45-59. Practice. 21(2), 156-159.
Jakopič J., Veberič R. and Štampar F. 2009. Pathak N. and Khandelwal S. 2007. Role of oxi-
Extraction of phenolic compounds from green dative stress and apoptosis in cadmium induced
walnut fruits in different solvents. Acta Agricul- thymic atrophy and splenomegaly in mice. Tox-
turae Slovenica, 93(1), 11-15. icology Letters, 169(2), 95-108.
Kadam U.S.l., Ghosh S.B., De S., Suprasanna Payet, B.; Cheong, A. S. and Smadja, J. 2006.
P., Devasagayam T.P.A. and Bapat V.A. Comparison of the concentrations of phenolic
2008. Antioxidant activity in sugarcane juice constituents in cane sugar manufacturing prod-
and its protective role against radiation induced ucts with their antioxidant activities. Journal of
DNA damage. Food Chem. 106, 1154-1160. Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 54(19),
Kataoka H., Horiyama S., Yamaki M., Oku H., 7270–7276.
Ishiguro K., Katagi T., Takayama M., Semma Reeves P.G., Nielsen F.H. and Fahey G.C.Jr.
M. and Ito Y. 2002. Anti-inflammatry and anti- 1993. AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory ro-
allergic activities of hydroxylamine and related dents: final report of the American Institute of
compounds. Biological and Pharmaceutical Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the refor-
Bulletin. 25(11), 1436-1441. mulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J. Nutri-
Khan S.W., Ghafoor A. and Ahamd N. 2018. tion, 123(11), 1939-1951.
Hepatoprotective Properties of Sugarcane Juice Reitman S. and Frankel S. 1957. A colorimetric
and Vitamin C were compared in a Mouse Mod- method for the determination of serum GOT and
el of Liver Injury Induced by INH (Isoniazid). Pa- GPT. American. J. Clin. Path. 28(1), 56-63.
kistan J. of Medical and Health Sci. 12(2), Schieber A., Keller P. and Carle R. 2001. Deter-
764-767. mination of phenolic acids and flavonoids of ap-
Kowalczyk E., Kopff A., Fijalkowski P., Kopff ple and pearby high-performance liquid chroma-
M., Niedworok J., Blaszczyk J., Kedziora J. tography. J. of Chromatography A. 910(2),
and Tyślerowizc P. 2003. Effect of anthocya- 265-273.
nins on selected biochemical parameters in rats Searcy R.L., Reardon J.E. and Foreman J.A.
exposed to cadmium. Acta Biochim Pol. 50(2), 1967. Enzymatic colourimetric method of the de-
543-548. termination of plasma urea, Amer. J. Clinc.
Kulkarni D.B., Deshpande H.W., Sakhale B.K. Tech. 33, 15-20.
and Pawar V.S. 2018. Sweet Sorghum Syrup
Sho H., Chinen L., Uchihara K. and Fukuda N. Valle`s A., Marti-sistac O., Garcı´a A. and Ar-
1981. Effects of Okinawan sugarcane rind on mario A. 2000. Single exposure to stressors
serum and liver cholesterol and triglyceride lev- causes long-lasting, stress-dependent reduction
els in the rat. J. of Nutritional Sci. and Vitami- of food intake in rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regula-
nology. 27(5), 463-470. tory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 279(3),
Snedecor G.W. and Cochran W.G. 1980. Statisti- R1138-R1144.
cal methods 7th ed. Lowa State University Verheye H.W. 2010. Soils, plant growth and crop
Press, Ames, lowa, USA. production, Vol. I. Growth and Production of
Talas Z.S., Orun I., Ozdemir I., Erdogan K., Al- Sugarcane. National Sci. Foundation Flan-
kan A. and Yilmaz I. 2008. Antioxidative role of ders and Geography Dept., Univ. of Ghent,
seleni-um against the toxic effect of heavy met- Belgium, pp. 208-241.
als (Cd+2, Cr+3) on liver of rainbow trout (On- Zhang Y., Liu X., Lu H., Mei L. and Liu Z. 2009.
corhynchus mykiss Walbaum 1792). Fish Phys- Lipid Peroxidation and Ultrastructural Modifica-
iol. Biochem. 34(3), 217-222. tions in Brain after Perinatal Exposure to Lead
Thilagavathi T. and Hemalatha G. 2016. Evalua- and/or Cadmium in Rat Pups. Biomedical and
tion of quality characteristics of sugarcane syr- Environmental Sci. 22, 423-429.
up. Int. J. of Nutrition and Agric. Research Zhou Y.J., Zhang S.P., Liu C.W. and Cai Y.Q.
3(2), 49- 55. 2009. The protection of selenium on ROS medi-
Vaghasiya Y.K., Shukla V.J. and Chanda S.V. ated-apoptosis by mitochondria dysfunction in
2011. Acute oral toxicity study of Pluchea arguta cadmium-induced LLC-PK (1) cells.Toxicol. In
boiss extract in mice. J. of Pharmacology and Vitro. 23(2), 288-294.
Toxicology 6(2), 113-123.
النشاط الوقائي لشراب كل من الذرة الرفيعة السكرية و قصب السكر ضد اإلجهاد التأكسدي
المستحث بإستخدام الكادميوم فى الفئران البيضاء
ُ
][515
ى*1
1
-سمير يعقوب بشيت 2
-السيد إبراهيم يوسف - 2نسرين محمد نبيه يسن يا ار إبراهيم حنفى الجداو
-1قسم تكنولوجيا السكر -معهد بحوث المحاصيل السكرية -مركز البحوث الزراعية – الجيزه -مصر
-2قسم علوم األغذية -كلية الزراعة -جامعة عين شمس -ص.ب 86 .حدائق شب ار -11211القاهرة -مصر
*Corresponding author: yara_elgeddawy@yahoo.com
Received 16 May, 2019 Accepted 12 June, 2019