DEFINITION v According to popper, what distinguishes scientific claims from nonscientific claims
v A hypothesis is scientific if and only if there is some way by which it can be falsified by means of some experiment.
FALSIFIABLE v If a crucial experiment which can potentially falsify a hypothesis cannot be constructed, then the hypothesis, even if it is meaningful, is not really scientific.
EXAMPLES v When Einstein developed his theory of relativity, he claimed that the gravitational force from large objects such as the sun would bend light that came in its direction.
v This hypothesis can be falsified by examining the light coming from stars during an eclipse. Observations have shown that light indeed bends when it passes around large objects.
EXAMPLES v Falsifiable Statement: All cars are white.
v This statement can be proven false with any observation that a car is not white
v Unfalsifiable Statement: Invisible fairies that cannot be detected by humans live in forests.
v This statement cannot be proven to be correct or false, thus it is not falsifiable.
CRITICISM v Imre Lakatos criticized Popper’s view and said that scientists do not go around trying to falsify a hypothesis.
v IF an experiment falsifies a hypothesis, it is unwise to reject the hypothesis altogether because the failure of the experiment may be due to some error in its design or that the theory being tested only needs modification and need not be rejected completely.
SOURCES v Falsification Principle. (n.d.). In Alleydog.com's online glossary. Retrieved from: https:// www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition-cit.php? term=Falsification+Principle