Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Βραχνός, Μοντέλα Εκθετικών Γραφημάτων
Βραχνός, Μοντέλα Εκθετικών Γραφημάτων
TMHMA MAJHMATIKWN
DIPLWMATIKH ERGASIA
P P
D M
ROSARMOGH, ROSOMOIWSH
E T
KAI IAGNWSH ONTELWN
G
KJETIKWN UQAIWN
RAFHMATWN
QRHSTOS I. BRAQNOS
Epiblèpwn
MWUSHS A. MPOUNTOURIDHS
Anaplhrwt Kajhght
'Ena ek bajèwn euqarist¸ sthn oikogènei mou kai pio sugkekrimèna stou
gone
mou, Eustrata kai Iwnnh, pou qwr
autoÔ
, me apl kai lit lìgia, de
ja briskìmoun sthn euqristh jèsh na sa
parajètw t¸ra autè
ti
lèxei
.
Ousiastik , epiplèon, up rxe kai h bo jeia th
upìloiph
oikogèneia
mou,
pou me endiafèron agkliasan kti pou pragmatik agapw: ta Majhmatik.
En katakledi, ofelw èna meglo euqarist¸ sto flo kai sundelfo Miqa l
Epitropkh, didaktorikì foitht tou tm mato
Majhmatik¸n tou Panepisth-
mou Patr¸n. H anidiotel
arwg kai oi parathr sei
tou, ìson afor ton
trìpo suggraf
th
ergasa
, up rxan polÔ ousiastikè
.
Perieqìmena
Eisagwg 1
2 To Dktuo Florentine 31
2.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.2 Prosarmog Montèlou EkjetikoÔ Tuqaou
Graf mato
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2.3 Statistikè
DiktÔou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.4 Prosomowsh DiktÔou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.5 Prosarmog Montèlou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.6 Ekfulismì
kai Diagnwstik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
3 To Dktuo FMH 43
3.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3.2 Prosarmog Montèlou EkjetikoÔ Tuqaou
Graf mato
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
3.3 Anagn¸rish EkfulismoÔ tou Montèlou . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.4 Mh Ekfulismèna Montèla Duadik
Exrthsh
. . . . . . . . 58
i
3.5 Poiìthta Prosarmog
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
5 Parrthma 81
5.1 To Peribllon R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.1.1 Genik Parousash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.1.2 Pakèta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
5.1.3 DianÔsmata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Bibliografa 86
ii
Katlogo
Sqhmtwn
1.1 Sqhmatismo kai parmetroi gia ta montèla tuqawn grafhm-
twn Markov. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.2 (A-H) Sqhmatismo gia èna montèlo qarakthristik¸n Markov
montèlo koinwnik
epilog
graf mato
Markov. . . . . . 17
1.3 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1.4 2-, 3- kai 4-anexrthte
2-diadromè
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.5 Kateujunìmena 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.1 To dktuo Flomarriage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.2 H prosomowsh tou prosarmosmènou diktÔou Flomarriage. . . 39
2.3 Dignwsh poiìthta
prosarmog
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
3.1 To dktuo FMH qwr
ti
memonwmène
korufè
. . . . . . . . . 45
3.2 To dktuo FMH me ti
memonwmène
korufè
. . . . . . . . . . . 46
3.3 To dktuo FMH (qwr
ti
memonwmène
korufè
) me ti
koru-
fè
qrwmatismène
anloga th
bajmologa
twn majht¸n. . . 47
3.4 SÔgkrish katanom
bajm¸n metaxÔ twn diktuak¸n dedomènwn
FMH kai tou deÔterou montèlou (model 2). . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.5 Diagnwstik MCMC tou trtou montèlou. . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.6 SÔgkrish montèlwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
3.7 SÔgkrish trig¸nwn se 100 prosomoi¸sei
tou montèlou 4 (i-
stìgramma) kai twn arqik¸n dedomènwn (kìkkino bèlo
). . . . 63
3.8 Poiìthta prosarmog
gia bajmoÔ
tou montèlou 4. . . . . . . 64
3.9 Poiìthta prosarmog
tou montèlou 4 gia thn katanom twn
akmiak diamoirasmènwn etarwn kai thn katanom th
gewdai-
tik
apìstash
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
4.1 To dktuo IPRED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
4.2 To dktuo IPRED qrwmatismèno anloga me to qarakthristikì
tou tÔpou twn dr¸ntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.3 To dktuo IPRED qrwmatismèno anloga me to qarakthristikì
twn topojet sewn twn dr¸ntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.4 To dktuo SWPAT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
4.5 To dktuo SWPAT qrwmatismèno anloga me to qarakthristi-
kì tou tÔpou twn dr¸ntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.6 To dktuo SWPAT qrwmatismèno anloga me to qarakthristi-
kì twn topojet sewn twn dr¸ntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
iii
1
Eisagwg
H paroÔsa diplwmatik ergasa brsketai ston eurÔtero q¸ro th
majhmati-
k
statistik
jewra
twn grafhmtwn. KÔrio
stìqo
ma
, ìpw
anafè-
rei kai o ttlo
, enai h montelopohsh grafhmtwn, me ap¸tero skopì thn
prosarmog , prosomowsh kai dignwsh aut¸n mèsw montèlwn ekjetik¸n tu-
qawn grafhmtwn.
1. To dktuo Florentine.
Tèlo
, sto parrthma th
ergasa
dnoume mia sÔntomh eisagwg sto peribl-
lon R kai se kpoie
genikè
entolè
autoÔ.
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 3
Gia pardeigma, èna apì ta endiafèronta zht mata, enai na broÔme en sto
parathroÔmeno dktuo uprqoun perissìtera ligìtera shmantik domik qa-
rakthristik apì aut pou ja perimèname se èna tuqao grfhma. Upojètoume
ìti mporoÔme na eklboume aut ta qarakthristik w
apotelèsmata th
dr-
sh
kpoiwn topik¸n koinwnik¸n diadikasi¸n. Gia pardeigma, mporoÔme na
rwt soume -ìpw
oi Moreno & Jennings èkanan to 1938 se mia apì ti
pr¸te
efarmogè
th
statistik
sta koinwnik dktua [19℄- en to parathroÔmeno
dktuo fèrei mia isqur tsh gia amoibaiìthta, megalÔterh kai pèra apì thn tu-
qaa katanom twn kateujunìmenwn desm¸n, en auto sqhmatzontan entel¸
sthn tÔqh. Me lla lìgia, tenoun oi dr¸nte
tou parathroÔmenou diktÔou
na sqhmatzoun amoibae
(antapodidìmene
) epilogè
sqèsewn? Ed¸, to do-
mikì qarakthristikì (oi amoibaoi desmo) enai to apotèlesma mia
koinwnik
diadikasa
(ìpw
, p.q., ta toma epilègoun na antapoddoun ti
epilogè
twn
llwn atìmwn). 'Etsi, san èna aplì pardeigma, mporoÔme na jewr soume èna
montèlo stoqastikoÔ diktÔou me dÔo paramètrou
, mia pou ekfrzei thn tsh
gia tuqaou
desmoÔ
kai epiprìsjeth tsh gia amoibaou
(antapodidìmenou
)
desmoÔ
.
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 4
'Otan èqoume orsei thn katanom pijanot twn se ìlo to sÔnolo twn grafhm-
twn me ton dio arijmì kìmbwn, mporoÔme epsh
na sqedisoume graf mata,
pou lambnontai tuqaa apì thn katanom , sÔmfwna me ti
antstoiqe
pijanì-
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 5
Autì to b ma emperièqei èna stoqastikì plasio gia thn anlush grafhm-
twn me stajerì sÔnolo kìmbwn. Upojètonta
ìti kje desmì
tou diktÔou
jewretai w
mia tuqaa metablht , den ennooÔme ìti oi njrwpoi sqhmatzoun
koinwnikè
sqèsei
me ton dio trìpo: kpoie
sqèsei
mpore na enai pio pija-
nè
. Antjeta, apl¸
lème ìti de gnwrzoume ta pnta gia ton sqhmatismì twn
sqèsewn, ìti to montèlo ma
den prìkeitai na knei tèleie
nteterministikè
problèyei
kai ìti, epomènw
, ja uprqei kpoio
stoqastikì
jìrubo
k-
poia èlleiyh kanonikìthta
, pou de ja mporoÔme na exhg soume ikanopoihtik.
B ma DeÔtero: H upìjesh exrthsh kai h tuqaa sunfeia metaxÔ twn di-
ktuak¸n metablht¸n
riorism¸n
Gia na orsoume èna montèlo xekjara, prèpei na mei¸soume ton arijmì twn
paramètrwn. Autì suqn epitugqnetai epibllonta
kpoiou
periorismoÔ
omoiogèneia
. Sthn pragmatikìthta, exetzoume en kpoie
parmetroi prè-
pei na exiswjoÔn na susqetistoÔn alli¸
. Gia pardeigma, sun jw
pro-
tenetai mia parmetro
gia to fainìmeno th
amoibaiìthta
pnw se ìlo to
dktuo, upojètonta
ìti oi parmetroi amoibaiìthta
gia kje pijanì amoibao
(antapodidìmeno) desmì enai ìle
se
. Pio ktw, ja mil soume gia tou
pe-
riorismoÔ
twn paramètrwn se sugkekrimèna paradegmata montèlwn
ìpou (i) to jroisma enai pnw se ìlou
tou
sqhmatismoÔ
A, (ii) ηA enai
h parmetro
, pou antistoiqe sto sqhmatismì A (kai enai mh mhdenik mìno
en ìla ta zeugria twn metablht¸n sto A upoteje ìti enai upì sunj kh
1
exarthmèna ), (iii) gA (y) =
yij ∈A yij enai h diktuak statistik , pou anti-
Q
Epomènw
, h upìjesh exrthsh
enai krsimh gia ton periorismì twn pijan¸n
sqhmatism¸n sto montèlo. Ja d¸soume kpoia sugkekrimèna paradegmata
paraktw. 'Ena
sqhmatismì
A anafèretai se èna uposÔnolo metablht¸n,
pou apoteloÔntai apì desmoÔ
, kai antistoiqe se mia mikr diktuak upodom .
Gia pardeigma, en se èna kateujunìmeno dktuo efarmìsoume thn upìjesh
duadik
exrthsh
, èpetai ìti oi parmetroi amoibaiìthta
ja sumperilhfjoÔn
sto montèlo. Se aut n thn perptwsh, èna
sqhmatismì
sto montèlo enai
to sÔnolo twn metablht¸n {Y12 , Y21 }, èna
llo
enai to sÔnolo {Y13 , Y31 }
k.o.k., me kje duda na ddei to dikì th
sqhmatismì. Profan¸
, gia kje
ènan apì autoÔ
tou
sqhmatismoÔ
, en kai oi duo desmo enai parìnte
sto
parathroÔmeno grfhma, blèpoume ènan amoibao (antapodidìmeno) desmì kai,
gia autì, o sqhmatismì
anaparist èna tÔpo diktuak
upodom
, pou mpore
na parathrhje sto grfhma y. MporoÔme na skeftoÔme autìn to sqhmatismì
diagrammatik san thn dia thn upodom , dhlad , ton amoibao (antapodidìme-
no) desmì.
All bebaw
, den uprqei kama eggÔhsh ìti ìle
oi pijanè
akmè
se èna do-
jèn sqhmatismì ja enai paroÔse
se èna pragmatopoioÔmeno grfhma y kai,
gia autì, ja parathr soume kpoie
apì autè
ti
pijanè
upodomè
, all ìqi
lle
. Meriko desmo mpore na enai amoibaoi (antapodidìmenoi), lloi ìqi.
Oi sqhmatismo anaparistoÔn pijan apotelèsmata. Apì thn llh meri, h
statistik tou graf mato
, gA (y), ma
lèei en o sqhmatismì
A parathre-
tai pragmatik sto dktuo y. Gia ènan amoibao (antapodidìmeno) sqhmatismì
A, aut h statistik apl ma
lèei en uprqoun amoibaoi (antapodidìmenoi)
desmo metaxÔ twn sqetik¸n zeugari¸n twn kìmbwn ìqi.
Epeid h exswsh (1) perilambnei ènan ekjetikì ìro sto dexiì mèlo
th
,
tètoie
katanomè
anafèrontai san montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmtwn.
Ta tuqaa graf mata Markov twn Frank & Strauss (1986) [8℄ apoteloÔn mia
sugkekrimènh klsh twn montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmtwn. Merikè
forè
ta montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmtwn anafèrontai w
montèla p∗ ,
epeid apoteloÔn mia genkeush twn montèlwn duadik
anexarthsa
, èna apì
ta pr¸ta dhmofil paradegmata twn opown tan ta montèla p1 twn Holland
& Leinhardt (1981) [13℄.
All uprqoun arketo lloi trìpoi, me tou
opoou
oi periorismo sti
pa-
ramètrou
mporoÔn na eisaqjoÔn kai, ètsi, diaforetiko periorismo isqÔoun
se diaforetik montèla. SÔmfwna me mia llh mèjodo efarmog
periorism¸n,
exis¸soume ti
paramètrou
gia isomorfikoÔ
sqhmatismoÔ
ìtan emplèkon-
tai ìmoioi tÔpoi dr¸ntwn. Gia pardeigma, sthn perptwsh th
amoibaiìthta
sta sqolik dktua fila
, ja mporoÔsame na protenoume llh parmetro a-
moibaiìthta
gia sqhmatismoÔ
dudwn th
morf
kortsi-kortsi, llh gia
sqhmatismoÔ
agìri-kortsi kai llh gia sqhmatismoÔ
agìri-agìri.
ParathroÔme ìti, sugkrnonta
me thn exswsh (1), kje sÔnolo A, pou peri-
lambnei mia mìno pijan akm Yij , enai èna
sqhmatismì
autoÔ tou montèlou
kai uprqei h parmetro
ηij gia kje ènan tètoio sqhmatismì. H diktuak
statistik gA (y) = gij (y) = yij ma
lèei en autì
o sqhmatismì
parath-
retai ìqi. En epiblloume thn upìjesh th
omoiogèneia
, ètsi ¸ste kje
desmì
na sumperifèretai me ton dio trìpo, exis¸noume ti
paramètrou
¸ste
ηij = θ , gia ìla ta i kai j , kai, ra:
!
1
Pr(Y = y) = exp(θL(y)) (2)
κ
ìpou L(y) = i,j yi,j enai o arijmì
twn tìxwn sto grfhma y kai h parme-
P
ìpou L11 (y) enai o arijmì
twn tìxwn mèsa sto pr¸to mplok kai L12 (y) o
arijmì
twn tìxwn apì to mplok 1 sto mplok 2 k.o.k.
Mia elafr¸
pio perplokh (all ìqi suqn polÔ realistik ) upìjesh gia
kateujunìmena graf mata enai ìti oi dude
, ant twn akm¸n, enai anexrth-
te
h ma apì thn llh. Me aut n thn upìjesh exrthsh
, èqoume duo tÔpou
sqhmatism¸n sto montèlo, aplè
akmè
kai amoibae
(antapodidìmene
) akmè
.
AfoÔ epiblloume thn omoiogèneia, to montèlo gnetai:
! !
1 X X
Pr(Y = y) = exp ϑ yij + ρ yij yji
κ
i,j i,j
!
1
= exp(θL(y) + ρM (y)) (3)
κ
ìpou L(y) enai o arijmì
twn desm¸n sto y kai M (y) = i,j yij yji enai o
P
MetaxÔ kpoiwn llwn sqetik¸n, all pio polÔplokwn kai realistik¸n montè-
lwn, enai to montèlo p2 (Lazega & van Duijn, 1997 [17], van Duijn et al.,
2004 [41]), ìpou upotjetai ìti èqoume duadik anexarthsa all kai exrthsh
apì ta qarakthristik twn kìmbwn (dr¸ntwn). To montèlo p2 enai katllhlo,
se peript¸sei
pou perimènoume th dom na diamorfwje apì ta qarakthristi-
k. Enai mia proèktash tou montèlou p1 me ti
epidrsei
tou apostolèa kai
tou paral pth na antimetwpzontai san tuqae
epidrsei
, sumperilambano-
mènwn kai twn epidrsewn twn dr¸ntwn kai twn dudwn dr¸ntwn. 'Oso pio
polÔploke
upojèsei
sthrzoun autì to montèlo, tìso pio realistikì autì
gnetai gia pragmatik diktuak dedomèna, eidik ìtan oi epidrsei
twn qa-
rakthristik¸n anamènontai na enai isqurè
. Diafèrei apì ta sÔnhjh montèla
ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmtwn w
pro
thn enswmtwsh twn tuqawn epi-
drsewn. Bebaw
, sthn perptwsh twn mh kateujunìmenwn grafhmtwn, ta
montèla Bernoulli kai ta montèla duadik
exrthsh
enai tautìshma: gia mh
kateujunìmena graf mata, h parmetro
amoibaiìthta
p sthn exswsh (3)
den pazei kanèna rìlo kai to montèlo angetai sthn exswsh (2).
sÔmfwna me thn opoa èna
pijanì
desmì
apì to i sto j jewretai ìti exar-
ttai apì opoiond pote llo pijanì desmì, pou perilambnei to i to j ,
dojèntwn ìlwn twn llwn desm¸n. Se aut n thn perptwsh, lème ìti oi dÔo
desmo enai upì sunj kh exart¸menoi, dojèntwn twn tim¸n ìlwn twn llwn
desm¸n.5 H exrthsh Markov mpore na qarakthriste w
h upìjesh ìti duo
pijano desmo diktÔou enai upì sunj kh exart¸menoi, ìtan sundèoun ènan
koinì dr¸nta. Gia pardeigma, h sqèsh metaxÔ tou Pètrou kai th
Marh
mpore na exarttai epsh
apì thn parousa thn apousa th
sqèsh
metaxÔ
th
Marh
kai tou Ginnh (idw
en h sqèsh aut enai aisjhmatik !). Mpo-
roÔme na to ekfrsoume pio tupik, upojètonta
thn upì sunj kh exrthsh
metaxÔ ìlwn twn pijan¸n desm¸n Yπµ kai Yµγ . Auto oi dÔo pijano desmo
enai upì sunj kh exart¸menoi, epeid moirzontai ton kìmbo µ (Marh).
Gia pardeigma, èna montèlo tuqaou graf mato
Markov gia èna mh kateuju-
nìmeno dktuo me epidrsei
akm¸n, 2-asteri¸n kai 3-asteri¸n enai to:
!
1
Pr(Y = y) = exp θL(y) + σ2 S2 (y) + σ3 S3 (y) + τ T (y) (4)
κ
ìpou S2 (y) kai S3 (y) enai oi arijmo twn 2-asteri¸n kai twn 3-asteri¸n,
antstoiqa, mèsa sto dktuo y kai T (y) enai o arijmì
twn trig¸nwn sto
y. ParathroÔme ìti, gia tuqaa graf mata Markov, enai epsh
pijanì na
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 16
Mia apl upìjesh exrthsh
anmesa sta qarakthristik kai sti
diktuakè
metablhtè
enai ìtan to qarakthristikì tou i ephrezei pijanoÔ
desmoÔ
,
pou sundèoun to i (dhlad , Yij ), kai anaferìmaste se aut n thn upìjesh
w
upìjesh twn qarakthristik¸n Markov. Gia pardeigma, se èna organw-
tikì plasio, h arqaiìthta enì
dr¸nto
(p.q., arqaiìthta sti
dieujuntikè
ikanìthte
) mpore na ephresei tou
pijanoÔ
desmoÔ
autoÔ tou dr¸nto
.
An jewr soume qarakthristik Markov maz me diktuakè
exart sei
Marko-
v, gia èna mh kateujunìmeno grfhma, to montèlo perilambnei tou
sqhma-
tismoÔ
(mèqri 3-astèria), pou fanontai sto sq ma 1.2, ìpou oi gkri kìmboi
7
Mia llh mèjodo
enswmtwsh
twn qarakthristik¸n twn dr¸ntwn enai mèsw mo-
ntèlwn koinwnik
epdrash
, sta opoa oi desmo tou diktÔou problèpoun exwgen¸
ta
qarakthristik (Robins et al., 2001b [33]).
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 18
nwnik plasia. Basismènoi sthn doulei tou Feld (1981) [6℄, prìteinan gia pa-
radegmata koinwnikè
domè
mèsa se èna qwroqronikì plasio, ìpw
mia omda
anjr¸pwn sugkentrwmènwn thn dia stigm sto dio mèro
. Epsh
je¸rhsan
koinwnikè
domè
mèsa se èna perissìtero afhrhmèno koinwnikopolitistikì
q¸ro, ìpw
zeÔgh atìmwn sundedemènwn mèsw twn politik¸n desmeÔse¸n
tou
, kaj¸
kai domè
, pou antanakloÔn kpoiou
exwterikoÔ
periorismoÔ
,
ìpw
oi organwtikè
domè
.
'Ena epiprìsjeto knhtro gia thn eisagwg twn koinwnik¸n plaiswn enai to
gegonì
ìti h exrthsh Markov fanetai mh realistik gia megla dktua, sta
opoa oi dr¸nte
mpore akìmh kai na mh gnwrzoun kai gia thn Ôparxh k-
poiwn llwn dr¸ntwn kai na mh diajètoun trìpou
na èrjoun se epafè
maz
tou
, all ìmw
oi endeqìmenoi desmo tou
jewroÔntai akìma ìti mporoÔn
na ephresoun kai llou
pijanoÔ
desmoÔ
. An h upìjesh gia th dom enì
koinwnikoÔ plaisou enai kal jemeliwmènh, uprqoun epipt¸sei
ston tÔpo
twn dedomènwn, pou prèpei na sugkentrwjoÔn, gia mia pl rh katanìhsh tou
koinwnikoÔ diktÔou. Gia peraitèrw epexergase
se aut n thn kateÔjunsh
dete Schweinberger & Snijders (2003) [35].
Mia deÔterh kateÔjunsh, pou parousisthke apì tou
Pattison & Robins
(2002) [23℄, tan h idèa twn mh Markobian¸n exart sewn metaxÔ desm¸n, pou
de moirzontai ton dio dr¸nta, all pou mporoÔn na enai allhloexart¸menoi
dia mèsou sundèsewn me trta mèlh. Gia pardeigma, to Yij mpore na enai upì
sunj kh exart¸meno apì to Yrs gia tèsseri
diakritoÔ
dr¸nte
, en uprqei
èna
parathroÔmeno
desmì
metaxÔ ete twn i j kai ete twn r s. Aut
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 19
1.4 Ektmhsh
Oi Anderson et al. (1999) [1℄ sth melèth tou
twn montèlwn p∗ qrhsimo-
pohsan thn ektmhsh th
yeudo-pijanofneia
, pou eqe eisaqje apì tou
Strauss & Ikeda (1990) [40℄, gia na ektim soun ti
paramètrou
twn montèlwn
Markov. T¸ra gnwrzoume ìti, analìgw
twn dedomènwn, mpore na upr-
qoun sobar probl mata me ti
ektim sei
yeudo-pijanofneia
gia aut ta
montèla. All gia ta montèla tuqawn grafhmtwn Markov, h tupik mègi-
sth ektmhsh pijanofneia
den enai eÔkola ulopoi simh gia ìla ta dktua,
par mìno gia ta polÔ mikr, lìgw twn duskoli¸n upologismoÔ th
stajer
kanonikopohsh
sthn exswsh (1). Autì shmanei ìti oi tupikè
statistikè
teqnikè
de mporoÔn na efarmostoÔn se aut ta montèla. Aut ta probl ma-
ta èqoun xeperaste prìsfata me thn anptuxh twn nèwn teqnik¸n megsth
pijanofneia
Monte Carlo.
ìpou (i) to jroisma enai gia ìlou
tou
sqhmatismoÔ
A, pou perièqoun ta
Yij , (ii) ηA enai h parmetro
, pou antistoiqe sto sqhmatismì A, (iii) dA (y)
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 20
enai h statistik twn metabol¸n, dhlad , twn metabol¸n sthn tim th
di-
ktuak
statistik
zA (y), ìtan to yij allzei apì 1 se 0, kai (iv) yij
C enai
pijanìthta (sun jw
aut enai ete to pl re
ete to kenì grfhma). En to
montèlo perièqei mìno autè
ti
mh endiafèrouse
peript¸sei
, tìte de ja enai
qr simo gia montelopohsh pragmatik¸n diktÔwn. Oi melète
prosomoi¸sewn
protenoun ìti ta montèla grafhmtwn Markov, pou perièqoun toulqiston mh
mhdenikè
paramètrou
3-asteri¸n, tenoun na brskontai ligìtero sthn kat-
stash tou sqedìn ekfulismoÔ apì ìti ta montèla, sta opoa h an¸tath
txh
mh mhdenik parmetro
enai gia 2-astèria (Robins et al., 2005 [29]). All gia
to sunupologismì twn paramètrwn 3-asteri¸n suqn den arke h apomkrun-
sh th
sumperifor
tou sqedìn ekfulismoÔ se montèla grafhmtwn Markov,
idw
ìtan prospajoÔme na broÔme montèla, pou anapargoun ta uyhl eppe-
da metabatikìthta
, ta opoa suqn parathroÔntai se anjr¸pine
koinwnikè
domè
(Snijders et al., 2006 [38]). To gegonì
ìti aut ta probl mata mpore
na mhn parousiastoÔn sthn ektmhsh th
yeudo-pijanofneia
apl shmanei
ìti, gia sqedìn ekfulismèna montèla, oi ektim sei
th
yeudo-pijanofneia
mpore na enai paraplanhtikè
. To kÔrio prìblhma se autè
ti
peript¸sei
enai ìti to montèlo den enai kal¸
- kajorismèno.
To gegonì
enai ìti difore
teqnikè
ektmhsh
Monte Carlo enai plèon
diajèsime
kai ìpote qreizetai, autè
protimoÔntai. Autè
oi nèe
mejodolo-
ge
bgzoun sthn epifneia kpoie
aneprkeie
sta montèla tuqawn grafh-
mtwn Markov, ìtan, gia pardeigma, oi metabatikè
epidrsei
enai isqurè
.
En autì sumbanei gia èna dojèn sÔnolo dedomènwn, mporoÔme na parathr -
soume ìti enai adÔnato na exaqjoÔn sunepe
ektim sei
twn paramètrwn me
thn ektmhsh Monte Carlo megsth
pijanofneia
(apì teqnik
poyh
, h
diadikasa ektmhsh
de sugklnei). Autì shmanei ìti ta montèla grafhmtwn
Markov enai akatllhla gia ta dedomèna. Gia autìn ton lìgo oi Snijders et
al. (2006) [38℄ eis gagan kpoie
nèe
prodiagrafè
gia montèla ekjetik¸n
1 MONT
ELA EKJETIK
WN TUQA
IWN GRAFHM
ATWN MARKOV 22
tuqawn grafhmtwn.
Oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄ prìteinan trei
nèe
statistikè
, pou mpo-
roÔn na sumperilhfjoÔn gia ti
prodiagrafè
montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn
grafhmtwn: ta enallassìmena k-astèria, ta enallassìmena k-trgwna kai ti
anexrthte
enallassìmene
2-diadromè
. Ed¸, ja sugkentrwjoÔme sta pr¸-
H statistik (6) perilambnei astèria ìlwn twn txewn, all, gia λ megalÔte-
ro th
monda
, h epdrash twn asteri¸n an¸terh
txh
mei¸netai, gia megla
k kai gia enallassìmena prìshma. Me aut n thn ènnoia, h upìjesh enai ml-
lon genikìterh apì thn apl epibol sti
paramètrou
twn asteri¸n an¸terh
txh
th
tim
0, pou enai h upìjesh, pou uponoetai sthn (4).9
Autì pou enai shmantikì enai p¸
ermhneÔetai aut h parmetro
mèsw twn
sunepei¸n, pou èqei gia th dom tou graf mato
. Fusik, h ektmhsh mia
pa-
ramètrou gia mia dojesa topik dom enai sun jw
endeiktik th
èktash
,
me thn opoa h dom empeirik parathretai (arke na mhn uprqoun zht mata
ekfulismoÔ ditropikìthta
). All h suss¸reush aut¸n twn dom¸n ja pa-
rgei idiatere
sunolikè
diktuakè
domè
, opìte, ìtan èna dktuo emfanzei
tètoie
domè
, ja mporoÔsame na perimènoume ti
ektim sei
twn sqetik¸n pa-
ramètrwn na enai megle
kai axioshmewte
.
Yrs kai Ysv (k.o.k.) upotjetai epsh
ìti enai anexrthta. Den enai dÔskolo
na parathr soume diaisjhtik ìti, ìtan isqÔoun oi upojèsei
th
exrthsh
koinwnik¸n kuklwmtwn kai exrthsh
Markov, kpoioi sqhmatismo, pou e-
nai pio polÔplokoi apì ìti ta apl trgwna, enai shmantiko gia to montèlo.
Akìmh, ìpw
èqoun uposthrxei oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄, gia na apofeu-
qje o ekfulismì
sth montelopohsh tètoiwn sugkentr¸sewn trig¸nwn, qrei-
zetai na eisaqje mia parmetro
basismènh sth metabatikìthta, h opoa en-
swmat¸nei uposÔnola apì kìmbou
megalÔterou
apì tra. Tètoie
parme-
troi qreizontai gia na fèrnoun thn isorropa metaxÔ th
tsh
gia mllon
poll sunektik uposÔnola tri¸n perissìterwn kìmbwn, all kai tou perio-
rismoÔ tou sunolikoÔ arijmoÔ twn trig¸nwn, pou enai anagkao
gia thn a-
pofug tou pl rou
graf mato
. Epsh
, aut h parmetro
apaite mia sta-
tistik , pou den enai grammik w
pro
to pl jo
twn trig¸nwn mèsa ston
ekjetikì ìro, se antjesh me thn (4). Aut h grammikìthta ston ekjèth a-
potele mia kÔria phg tou probl mato
tou ekfulismoÔ, ìtan ta graf mata
èqoun poll trgwna. H statistik twn enallasìmenwn k-trig¸nwn prospa-
je na ikanopoi sei autè
ti
angke
, me to enallassìmeno prìshmo kai ta
meioÔmena brh gia k-trgwna an¸terh
txh
na uphretoÔn tou
diou
sko-
poÔ
ston periorismì twn problhmtwn ekfulismoÔ, ìpw
gia enallasìmena
k-astèria.
Oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄ prìteinan epsh
mia parmetro, pou enai è-
na
sqhmatismì
mikrìterh
txh
gia èna k-trgwno, thn k-2-diadrom . Oi
sqhmatismo twn k-2-diadrom¸n paristnoun ton arijmì twn diakekrimènwn
2-diadrom¸n anmesa se èna zeugri kìmbwn. MporoÔn na jewrhjoÔn w
k-
trgwna qwr
na sumperilambnoun th bsh. To knhtro gia ti
k-2-diadromè
enai h eisagwg mia
paramètrou, pou ìtan qrhsimopoietai se sunduasmì me
ta k-trgwna, ja kajist ikanoÔ
tou
ereunhtè
na diakrnoun ti
tsei
sqh-
matismoÔ akm¸n sth bsh sti
pleurè
enì
k-trig¸nou. ParathroÔme ìti
oi pleurè
enì
k-trig¸nou, ìtan den uprqei h bsh, paristoÔn ènan tÔpo o-
madopohsh
akm¸n, pou apotele mìno thn propìjesh th
metabatikìthta
,
en¸ h parousa th
akm
th
bsh
antanakl th metabatik kleistìthta.
'Etsi, autì
o sunduasmì
twn paramètrwn pistopoie thn pesh gia metaba-
tik kleistìthta (all mia pesh, pou den auxnetai grammik me to k ston
ekjèth). To sq ma 1.4 deqnei domè
2-, 3- kai 4-2-diadrom¸n. AkoloÔjw
,
oi metr sei
aut¸n twn dom¸n enswmat¸nontai se mia statistik anlogh me
thn (7).
thn katanom twn bajm¸n, all jètei megalÔtero bro
sto pl jo
twn kìmbwn me tou
qamhlìterou
bajmoÔ
, me ta brh na mei¸nontai
gewmetrik ìso oi bajmo auxnontai.
2 To Dktuo Florentine
2.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔou
Sto keflaio autì, ìpw
kai sta dÔo epìmena, ja efarmìsoume th jewra twn
montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmtwn Markov, thn opoa èqoume parou-
sisei sto pr¸to keflaio. H efarmog autoÔ tou statistikoÔ montèlou ja
ulopoihje ed¸ mèsw tou pakètou statnet (Goodreau et. al, 2006 [9]).
R> library(statnet)
R> library(ergm)
R> library(sna)
Gia na doÔme to sÔnolo twn dedomènwn, pou enai diajèsima sto statnet, ekte-
loÔme:
R> data()
R> data(florentine)
R> flomarriage
kai parnoume:
Network attributes:
vertices = 16
directed = FALSE
hyper = FALSE
loops = FALSE
multiple = FALSE
2 TO D
IKTUO FLORENTINE 32
total edges= 20
Vertex attribute names:
vertex.names wealth priorates totalties
edgelist matrix:
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 9 1
[2,] 6 2
[3,] 7 2
[4,] 9 2
[5,] 5 3
[6,] 9 3
[7,] 7 4
[8,] 11 4
[9,] 15 4
[10,] 11 5
[11,] 15 5
[12,] 8 7
[13,] 16 7
[14,] 13 9
[15,] 14 9
[16,] 16 9
[17,] 14 10
[18,] 15 11
[19,] 15 13
[20,] 16 13
R> plot(flomarriage)
ìpou lambnoume:
Newton-Raphson iterations: 5
MLE Coefficients:
edges
-1.609
Mia arket pio eÔqrhsth, pio analutik kai qwr
perittè
plhrofore
entol
enai h ktwji:
R> summary(flomodel1.01)
ìpou parnoume:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 5
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -1.6094 0.2449 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’
0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood
and are suspect.
Autì pou ma
endiafèrei mesa enai h ermhnea tou montèlou. Apì ì,ti blè-
poume, to log-odds na uprqei mia akm enai −1.609, me antstoiqh pijanìth-
ta 0.1667275 (= exp(−1.609)/[1 + exp(−1.609)]). To apotèlesma autì to
perimèname dedomènou ìti h puknìthta tou diktÔou upologzetai ìti enai sh
me 0.16 (= 20/(16 ∗ 15/2)).
Mia prosarmog pou mporoÔme na dialèxoume anafèretai tìso sti
akmè
ìso
kai ta trgwna:
R> flomodel.02 <- ergm(flomarriage~edges+triangle)
me apotelèsmata:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Ta antikemena tou R katèqoun pnta mia klsh. Gia na doÔme thn klsh tou
flomodel.02, den èqoume par na ektelèsoume thn entol :
R> class(flomodel.02)
ìpou lambnoume:
[1] "ergm"
'Ena llo montèlo prosarmog
enai to ex
, sto opoo ddetai barÔthta sto
qarakthristikì “wealth”:
me antstoiqa apotèlesma:
R> summary(flomodel.03)
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 4
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -2.594929 0.536056 NA <1e-04 ***
nodecov.wealth 0.010546 0.004674 NA 0.0259 *
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05
‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood
and are suspect.
Null Pseudo-deviance: 166.355 on 120 degrees of freedom
2 TO D
IKTUO FLORENTINE 36
R> help("ergm-terms")
Basic terms
Edges X X
mutual X
Degree terms
degree X vec. of degrees attrname
idegree X vec. of degrees attrname
odegree X vec. of degrees attrname
gwdegree X alpha, fixed
isolates X
Star terms
Kstar X vec. of degrees attrname
istar X vec. of degrees attrname
ostar X vec. of degrees attrname
m2star X
Actor-specific effects
receiver X
sender X
sociality X
Bounded terms
bounded.degree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.idegree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.odegree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.kstar X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.istar X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.ostar X bound, vec. of degrees
Autì pou ma
endiafèrei sthn prosomowsh enai kat pìso ja lboume dktua,
ta stoiqea twn opown antapokrnontai qwr
idiatere
apoklsei
sta arqik
2 TO D
IKTUO FLORENTINE 38
12 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
13 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
14 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
15 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
en¸ apì thn trth entol kai thn dignwsh th
poiìthta
th
prosarmog
prokÔptei to paraktw sq ma.
Goodness−of−fit diagnostics
0.5
0.4
proportion of nodes
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
degree
Enai gegonì
ìti ìso kalÔterh enai h poiìthta prosarmog
twn prosomoi-
wmènwn diktÔwn, se sqèsh pnta me to upì melèth dktuo, tìso kalÔterh enai
h ektmhsh th
sunrthsh
pijanofneia
. To qeirìtero senrio pou mporoÔ-
me na bi¸soume enai ta prosomoiwmèna dktua na enai telew
diaforetik apì
to parathroÔmeno dktuo. Autì mpore na sumbe gia duo lìgou
. O pr¸to
mpore na enai h apotuqa sÔgklish
tou algorjmou prosomowsh
. O llo
2 TO D
IKTUO FLORENTINE 41
A
jewr soume loipìn arqik kpoia diagnwstik gia thn akrbeia tou algor-
jmou prosomowsh
kai trìpou
beltws
tou:
me apotelèsmata:
R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)
Correlations of sample statistics:
, , cor
edges kstar2 kstar3 triangle
edges 1.0000000 0.8999023 0.7366523 0.4254382
kstar2 0.8999023 1.0000000 0.9510883 0.7219644
kstar3 0.7366523 0.9510883 1.0000000 0.8255294
triangle 0.4254382 0.7219644 0.8255294 1.0000000
, , lag1
R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)
, , lag1
R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)
3 To Dktuo FMH
3.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔou
To deÔtero pardeigma enai èna dktuo fila
, pnw sto opoo ja efarmìsoume
ti
analÔsei
th
mejodologa
tou montèlou ekjetikoÔ tuqaou graf mato
Markov, sÔmfwna me ti
shmei¸sei
tou seminarou gia to statnet kai to ergm
twn Goodreau et al. (2008) [10℄. Autì to dktuo apoteletai apì sqèsei
fi-
la
metaxÔ twn majht¸n tou gumnasou Faux Magnolia High, pou brsketai
sti
anatolikè
HPA. Se autì to dktuo ja anaferìmaste me to akrwnÔmio
FMH.
AfoÔ fort¸soume to statnet kai ti
biblioj ke
tou ergm kai tou sna,
diabzoume ta dedomèna tou diktÔou Faux Magnolia High:
R> data(faux.magnolia.high)
To dktuo autì to metonomzoume fmh:
R> fmh
Dedomènou ìmw
ìti to apotèlesma th
prohgoÔmenh
entol
enai idiate-
ra ektetamèno (perilambnei kai th lsta akm¸n tou diktÔou), mporoÔme na
ektelèsoume thn dia entol me thn paraktw sÔntomh morf :
R> summary(fmh)
opìte parnoume:
Network attributes:
vertices: 1461
directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 44
logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
density = 0.000913242
Vertex attributes:
vertex.names:
Grade:
7 8 9 10 11 12
185 210 317 299 257 193
Sex:
F M
768 693
Blèpoume ìti to dktuo èqei 1461 korufè
kai 974 akmè
. Profan¸
, upr-
qoun pollè
memonwmène
korufè
(memonwmènoi majhtè
). Epsh
, blèpoume
ìti oi korufè
(majhtè
) èqoun tra qarakthristik: ful , bajmologa kai
fÔlo (majht¸n).
R> plot(fmh,displayisolates=FALSE)
'Opw
blèpoume, uprqei mia meglh sunist¸sa kai arketè
lle
, faner
mikrìtere
. Prèpei na poÔme pli ìti èqoume {afairèsei} ti
memonwmène
korufè
. An den ti
afairoÔsame, ja proèkupte èna arket pio puknì kai
{dusangnwsto} dktuo, pou fanetai sto sq ma 3.2.
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 45
Gia na proume t¸ra thn katanom twn sunistws¸n tou diktÔou ekteloÔme
thn entol :
R> table(component.dist(fmh)$csize)
h opoa dnei:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 19 23 439
524 64 29 11 12 4 7 4 1 1 1 1 1 1
MporoÔme na sqedisoume to dktuo me ti
korufè
qrwmatismène
anloga
th
bajmologa
twn majht¸n (sq ma 3.3). H entol èqei w
ex
:
R> plot(fmh,displayisolates=FALSE,vertex.col="Grade")
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 46
R> fmh.degreedist<-table(degree(fmh,cmode="indegree"))
R> fmh.degreedist
parnoume:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
524 403 271 128 85 30 13 5 2
H entol aut mpore na prei kai thn ex
morf :
R> summary(fmh~degree(0:8))
Gia thn katanom twn bajm¸n anloga me ta qarakthristik twn majht¸n, h
entol enai:
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 47
R> summary(fmh~degree(0:8,"Attribute")),
ìpou sth jèsh tou Attribute bzoume, kat antistoiqa, autì pou ma
en-
diafèrei (Grade, Sex, Race).
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Grade")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 110 11 3 3 0 0
8 11 165 9 7 0 2
9 3 9 152 24 10 4
10 3 7 24 151 38 11
11 0 0 10 38 152 32
12 0 2 4 11 32 90
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Sex")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
F M
F 430 285
M 285 259
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Race")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
Asian Black Hisp NatAm Other White
Asian 7 4 0 1 0 35
Black 4 85 9 3 0 57
Hisp 0 9 1 0 0 48
NatAm 1 3 0 3 0 25
Other 0 0 0 0 0 5
White 35 57 48 25 5 691
H melèth ja xekin sei, ìpw
kai sthn prohgoÔmenh anlush tou diktÔou Flo-
rentine, me to pio aplì montèlo pou uprqei, to montèlo Bernoulli Erdös -
Rényi. 'Eqoume loipìn:
R> model1<-ergm(fmh~edges)
R> summary(model1)
kai parnoume:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 8
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -6.99760 0.03205 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’
0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive
pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
En autì to dktuo eqe paraqje apì to sugkekrimèno montèlo, tìte h ektmh-
sh (log-odds) gia ti
akmè
ja tan sh me −6.998. 'Ara h pijanìthta na
uprqei kpoia akm enai exp(−6.998)/(1 + exp(−6.998)) = 0.000913. H en-
tol summary(fmh) ma
deqnei ìti h puknìthta tou diktÔou enai ìntw
sh me
0.000913, dhlad , to phlko twn akm¸n tou graf mato
pro
ìle
ti
dunatè
akmè
pou ja mporoÔse na èqei to grfhma (974/((1461 ∗ 1460)/2)).
R> names(model1)
[1]"coef" "sample" "iterations" "mle.lik"
"MCMCtheta" "loglikelihoodratio" "gradient"
[8]"hessian" "covar" "samplesize" "failure"
"mc.se" "glm" "glm.null"
[15]"null.deviance" "aic" "theta1"
"offset" "drop" "network" "newnetwork"
[22]"formula" "constraints" "prop.weights"
'Omw
ta plèon endiafèronta stoiqea gia thn anlus kai thn sÔgkrish tou
montèlou enai oi suntelestè
(coefficients) kai h pijanofneia (likelihood):
R> model1$coef
edges
-6.997596
R> model1$mle.lik
[1] -7790.104
'Ena kalì montèlo, gia na arqsoume, enai autì pou protenei mia tsh gia
taxinomhmènh anmeixh - dhlad , ìti uprqei megalÔterh pijanìthta sqhmati-
smoÔ sundèsewn metaxÔ atìmwn th
dia
ful
, fÔlou bajmologa
. Au-
tì to montèlo enai to katllhlo gia na proqwr soume thn èreuna, dedomè-
nou ìti emfanzei duadik anexarthsa. 'Opw
exhgetai apì tou
Hunter et
al. (2008b) [16], tètoia montèla jewroÔntai genik¸
ìti enai pio eÔkolo na
prosarmostoÔn apì ìti lla montèla kai h diadikasa prosarmog
aut kje
aut den ephrezetai apì to en to montèlo enai akatllhlo gia ta dedomèna.
Se aut n thn perptwsh autì apotele epsh
mia arket logik upìjesh pou
mpore na protaje gia tètoia montèla.
A
elègxoume loipìn thn tsh gia taxinomhmènh anmeixh, h opoa enai omoiìmor-
fh gia kje klsh qarakthristik¸n dhlad , thn perptwsh pou uprqei h
dia tsh gia sÔnayh sqèsewn metaxÔ majht¸n th
dia
ful
(gia pardeig-
ma), anexrthta apì th ful , sthn opoa anaferìmaste. Autì to montèlo
mpore na prosarmoste qrhsimopoi¸nta
thn entol nodematch me to proka-
jorismèno ìrisma th
diff=FALSE:
Opìte parnoume:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Formula: fmh ~ edges + nodematch("Grade") + nodematch("Race") +
nodematch("Sex")
Newton-Raphson iterations: 9
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -10.01277 0.11526 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Grade 3.23105 0.08788 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Race 1.19646 0.08147 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Sex 0.88438 0.07057 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’
0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive
pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
Null Pseudo-deviance: 1478525 on 1066530 deg. of freedom
Residual Pseudo-deviance: 13057 on 1066526 deg. of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 1465467 on 4 deg. of freedom
AIC: 13065 BIC: 13113
R> model2$coef
kai
Blèpoume ìti kai oi tèsserei
ìroi enai shmantiko. Epsh
blèpoume mia dra-
matik aÔxhsh sthn pijanofneia tou montèlou autoÔ se sqèsh me to pr¸to
montèlo. Ja mporoÔse kane
na èkane, an jele, ènan tupikì èlegqo tou
lìgou pijanofanei¸n metaxÔ twn dÔo montèlwn.
Apì ìti blèpoume, to posostì ton protsewn pou gnane dektè
enai 33%. 'H,
alli¸
, epeid allxame ton arijmì twn bhmtwn sthn alusda th
prosomow-
sh
(thn tim tou burn-in) apì ton prokajorismèno arijmì 1.000 se 1.000.000,
mporoÔme na poÔme ìti 330.000 protsei
apì ti
sunolikè
1.000.000 gnane
dektè
. Epiprìsjeta, to ìrisma verbose=TRUE ma
deqnei sta apotelèsmata
to posostì th
epituqa
th
prosomows
ma
.
Kti pou krnetai idiaitèrw
qr simo enai h exètash twn mixing matrices gia
ta qarakthristik tou diktÔou gia na doÔme p¸
aut mporoÔn na sugkrijoÔn:
R> mixingmatrix(sim2,"Sex")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
F M
F 420 295
M 295 290
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Sex")
F M
F 430 285
M 285 259
Hisp 0 9 5 1 0 32
NatAm 0 0 1 0 0 16
Other 1 0 0 0 0 2
White 20 112 32 16 2 760
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Race")
Asian Black Hisp NatAm Other White
Asian 7 4 0 1 0 35
Black 4 85 9 3 0 57
Hisp 0 9 1 0 0 48
NatAm 1 3 0 3 0 25
Other 0 0 0 0 0 5
White 35 57 48 25 5 691
R> mixingmatrix(sim2,"Grade")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 64 6 9 8 12 3
8 6 89 15 12 4 10
9 9 15 234 14 17 8
10 8 12 14 214 19 10
11 12 4 17 19 146 7
12 3 10 8 10 7 104
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Grade")
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 110 11 3 3 0 0
8 11 165 9 7 0 2
9 3 9 152 24 10 4
10 3 7 24 151 38 11
11 0 0 10 38 152 32
12 0 2 4 11 32 90
Epsh
, kti pou endiafèrei mesa, enai h sÔgkrish th
katanom
twn baj-
m¸n:
R> plot(summary(fmh~degree(0:10)),type="l",lty=1)
R> lines(summary(sim2~degree(0:10)),lty=2)
Tèlo
, a
doÔme kai th sÔgkrish tou pl jou
twn trig¸nwn:
R> summary(fmh~triangle) triangle
169
R> summary(sim2~triangle) triangle
2
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 54
500
400
summary(fmh ~ degree(0:10))
300
200
100
0
2 4 6 8 10
Index
Apì ìti blèpoume, sta dedomèna uprqoun 169 trgwna, en¸ to montèlo th
prosomowsh
ma
èdwse mìno 2. Fanetai loipìn xekjara ìti to sugkekri-
mèno montèlo den sunèlabe th diadikasa, pou dhmioÔrghse ton parathroÔmeno
arijmì twn trig¸nwn.
R> model3<-ergm(fmh~edges+triangle)
R> pdf("model3diagnostics.pdf")
R> mcmc.diagnostics(model3)
R> dev.off()
Oi entolè
autè
dhmiourgoÔn èna arqeo pdf, apì to opoo parnoume to sq -
ma 3.5, ìpou mporoÔme na doÔme ti sumbanei sth statistik tou montèlou
kat thn teleutaa epanlhyh th
diadikasa
ektmhsh
MCMC (t¸ra thn
epanlhyh 3, epeid h prokajorismènh tim tou maxit sto ergm enai 3). Oi
grafikè
parastsei
sto aristerì mèro
deqnoun th qronik metabol th
alusda
, en¸ dexi ta antstoiqa istogrmmata. 'Eqei gnei h kanonikopohsh
w
pro
ta parathroÔmena dedomèna, pou ed¸ antistoiqoÔn sto 0. Se èna
montèlo, pou sugklnei, tètoie
statistikè
metabllontai stoqastik gÔrw
apì th mèsh tim , all den apoklnoun makri apì aut n, ìpw
sumbanei
t¸ra. Epomènw
, brskoume ìti oi arqikè
ma
ektim sei
gia ti
timè
twn
suntelest¸n dhmiourgoÔn dktua me polÔ perissìtera trgwna apì aut pou
parathroÔntai sta dedomèna, gegonì
to opoo kajist adÔnath thn ektmhsh
th
mègisth
pijanofneia
. Autì enai mia kal èndeixh ìti èqoume èna ekfu-
lismèno montèlo.
Apì thn llh meri, prèpei kane
na enai prosektikì
na mhn apodeqje po-
lÔ gr gora ton ekfulismì tou montèlou. Ta probl mata sÔgklish
, pou
perigrfhsan, mporoÔn, se orismène
peript¸sei
, na ofelontai ìqi epeid
to montèlo enai ekfulismèno, all apl¸
epeid h alusda Markov den èqei
afeje na trèxei gia arket meglo qronikì disthma ¸ste na mporèsei na ka-
lÔyei to deigmatoq¸ro epark¸
. Idiatera, kti tètoio mpore na sumbe, en
oi arqikè
timè
th
ektmhsh
brskontai polÔ makri apì thn ektmhsh th
mègisth
pijanofneia
(MLE). Prin loipìn katal xei kane
sth dignwsh
tou ekfulismoÔ, ja prèpei na diereun sei kpoie
epiprìsjete
epilogè
. Gia
autì to idiatero montèlo, kama apì ti
epilogè
autè
den mpore na bohj sei
shmantik, all ja ti
ektelèsoume en edei exskhsh
.
Mia mesh lÔsh ja tan h aÔxhsh tou megèjou
diast mato
kai twn dÔo
tou degmato
sto MCMC:
Warning:
The network has more than 50000 edges, and the model is
likely to be degenerate.
Warning: The diagnostics indicate that the model is very
unstable.
They suggest that the model is degenerate,
and that the numerical summaries are suspect.
Mia llh lÔsh ja tan h mewsh tou m kou
tou b mato
h aÔxhsh tou
sunolikoÔ arijmoÔ epanal yewn kai ta dÔo:
Sthn perptwsh aut , merikè
forè
to montèlo dnei parìmoia sflmata ìpw
to montèlo model3.take2. 'Allote mpore na emfaniste mia tèleia prosarmo-
g , me ti
ektim sei
twn suntelest¸n na stajeropoioÔntai gÔrw apì to -7.28
kai to 4.95. 'Omw
h eustjeia aut enai teqnht : Exetzonta
ti
diagnw-
stikè
MCMC kai- prosomoi¸nonta
apì ti
arqikè
statistikè
mporoÔme
na doÔme ìti sthn pragmatikìthta to montèlo apotugqnei na sugklnei.
Mia telik epilog enai na jewr soume ènan enallaktikì tÔpo apì to MCMC,
pou mpore na eisaggei kpoiou
periorismoÔ
sth diadikasa ektmhsh
. Sthn
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 58
prokajorismènh tou morf to MCMC sto ergm den èqei periorismoÔ
, all
diabajmzei thn epilog twn desm¸n (yi,j = 1) kai twn mh desm¸n (yi,j = 0)
ètsi ¸ste na exasfalzetai h epilog kje txh
me sunolik pijanìthta 0.5
anexrthta apì thn puknìthta tou diktÔou. Sto statnet h lÔsh aut o-
nomzetai TNT (dhlad , “tie/no-tie” desmì
/mh-desmì
). 'Omw
, ja
mporoÔse na epilege mia lÔsh, pou periorzei to deigmatikì q¸ro, p.q., me
th stajeropohsh tou sunolikoÔ arijmoÔ akm¸n tou bajmoÔ kìmbwn. Aut
mporoÔn na epilegoÔn prosjètonta
to ìrisma constraints=~edges con-
straints=~degrees sthn entol ergm, antistoqw
. H lÔsh aut sthrzetai
sth jewrhtik pepojhsh ìti oi periorismo mporoÔn na sullboun th genik
idèa th
stoqastik
diadikasa
pou dièpei to dktuo. An autì de sumbanei,
ja uprqei kpoio
ekfulismì
. 'Alle
epilogè
gia periorismoÔ
diabajm-
sei
tou MCMC dnontai sthn ergasa twn Morris et al. (2008) [20] mporoÔn
na brejoÔn sth bo jeia th
entol
ergm.
To pr¸to gegonì
pou parathroÔme enai ìti h ektmhsh gia na lbei q¸ra
qreizontai apì 15 èw
20 lept, anloga me thn isqÔ tou hlektronikoÔ ma
u-
pologist . Autì ìmw
pou ma
endiafèrei mesa kai prèpei na exetsoume, kai
sth sunèqeia na apofanjoÔme, enai pìso kal p ge h prosarmog , poiè
enai
oi grafikè
parastsei
th
diagnwstik
kai pìse
akmè
kai trgwna h pro-
somowsh perilambnei. H ermhnea twn suntelest¸n tou montèlou GWESP
enai pio polÔplokh apì ta prohgoÔmena montèla duadik
anexarthsa
:
R> model4.take1$coef
gwesp.fixed.0
1.7899988
W
pardeigma, ja upojèsoume ìti èqoume èna zeugri dr¸ntwn, pou diafè-
roun se ìla ta qarakthristik tou
. An den èqoun koinoÔ
flou
, tìte to
log-odds tou
na gnoun floi enai −9.795. En èqoun ton opoiod pote jetikì
arijmì koin¸n flwn kai kje èna
apì autoÔ
enai se èna toulqiston tr-
gwno me ìlou
tou
llou
, tìte to log-odds aut¸n na gnoun floi anèrqetai
se −7.997 (= −9.795 + 1.798). Epiplèon, en to α eqe jetik tim (antjeta
me thn perptwsh aut ìpou α = 0), tìte to log-odds tou
na gnoun floi
ja eqe auxhje monìtona (all upì-grammik) w
pro
ton arijmì twn koin¸n
fil¸n. En kpoioi apì tou
koinoÔ
flou
twn dÔo dr¸ntwn den tan se
kpoia trgwna metaxÔ tou
, tìte to log-odds auxnetai akìma perissìtero:
sthn perptwsh α = 0, prostjetai to 1.798 gia kje akm , pou den enai se
kpoio trgwno, kai to 1, ìtan oi dÔo dr¸nte
gnoun floi.
R> model4.take1$mle.lik
R> model4.take2$mle.lik
R> model4.take3$mle.lik
me apotelèsmata:
[1] -5604.138
[2] -5550.591
[3] -5500.916
R> summary(model4.take1)
R> summary(model4.take2)
R> summary(model4.take3)
ParathroÔme ìti, anexrthta th
tim
tou α, ìloi oi ìroi enai statistik sh-
mantiko kai oi suntelestè
den allzoun kat polÔ. Epilègoume thn perptw-
sh α = 0.2, gia na suneqsoume (ja mporoÔsame na eqame prei opoiad pote
llh tim ):
enai pio apotelesmatikì w
pro
thn arjmhsh twn trig¸nwn apì to montèlo
2. Ja qrhsimopoi soume èna meglo disthma deigmtwn, gia na elattwje o
suntelest
auto-susqètish
metaxÔ diadoqik¸n deigmtwn:
ParathroÔme ìti to posostì twn apodekt¸n bhmtwn paramènei sto 33% pe-
rpou dia mèsou th
alusda
sunolikoÔ m kou
107 , kti pou apotele kalì
shmdi mh ekfulismoÔ. Epeid prosomoi¸noume perissìtera apì èna dktua
(100 prosomoi¸sei
), to sim4 enai antikemeno diaforetik
klsh
apì to
sim1:
R> class(sim4)
[1] "network.series"
R> names(sim4)
[1] "formula" "networks" "stats" "coef"
R> class(sim4$networks[[1]])
[1] "network"
Gia na proume to pl jo
twn trig¸nwn sto kje èna apì ta 100 dktua, ja
prèpei na qrhsimopoi soume ton paraktw k¸dika tou R:
R> model4.tridist<-sapply(1:100,function(x){summary(sim4
R+ $networks[[x]]~triangle)})
R> hist(model4.tridist,xlim=c(50,200))
R> fmh.tri <- summary(fmh~triangle)
R> arrows(fmh.tri,20,fmh.tri,5,col="red",lwd=3)
Me thn entol :
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 63
Histogram of model4.tridist
30
25
20
Frequency
15
10
5
0
model4.tridist
Oi Goodreau et al. (2008) [10] èqoun anaptÔxei kpoion k¸dika, pou ulopoie
autìmata ìle
ti
parapnw fsei
poiìthta
prosarmog
gia kpoie
koinè
katanomè
diktÔwn. Autè
perilambnoun thn katanom bajm¸n, thn katanom
twn akmiak diamoirasmènwn etarwn (edgewise shared partners, dhlad , to
pl jo
twn akm¸n, sti
opoe
dÔo floi èqoun akrib¸
k koinoÔ
flou
)
kai thn gewdaitik katanom (to pl jo
twn zeug¸n dr¸ntwn gia ta opoa
h plhsièsterh metaxÔ tou
diadrom èqei m ko
k, gia kje tim tou k). A
dokimsoume pr¸ta na doÔme thn katanom twn bajm¸n:
R> gof4.deg <- gof(model4~degree,verbose=TRUE,burnin=1e+5,
R+ interval=1e+5)
O k¸dika
autì
prosomoi¸nei èna pl jo
diktÔwn (me prokajorismènh tim
100), upologzei ti
statistikè
gia aut se sqèsh me to arqikì dktuo, kaj¸
kai ti
p-timè
. Molonìti ìlh h plhrofora apojhkeÔetai sto antikemeno
gof4.deg kai mpore na diereunhje amèsw
, enai mllon eukolìtero na exeta-
ste (toulqiston arqik) me mia apl grafik parstash twn dedomènwn.
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 64
Goodness−of−fit diagnostics
0.4
0.3
proportion of nodes
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
degree
T¸ra a
pme sthn katanom twn akmiak diamoirasmènwn etarwn kai sthn
katanom th
gewdaitik
apìstash
:
Sto sq ma 3.9 èqoume th grafik parstash twn katanom¸n aut¸n sthn
klmaka log-odds, h opoa lambnetai apì ti
entolè
:
R> get(getOption("device"))(width=8,height=4)
R> par(mfrow=c(1,2))
R> plot(gof4.esp.dist,plotlogodds=TRUE)
Apì thn llh pleur, den èqoume sumperilbei tpote sqetkì me thn apìstash
sto montèlo ma
, parìti h apìstash enai mia sunolik idiìthta tou diktÔou.
Gia autì, paramènoun anapnthta erwt mata ìpw
: Pìso kal tairizoun oi
prosomoioÔmene
katanomè
apìstash
me thn parathroÔmenh? PoÔ ofelontai
oi diaforè
? MporoÔme na epektenoume to montèlo, gia na petÔqoume mia
kalÔterh poiìthta prosarmog
? Tètoia erwt mata diereun¸ntai sth bibli-
ografa, ìpw
oi Morris et al. (2008) [20], pou dnoun mia pl rh lsta twn
diajèsimwn orismtwn gia aut n th diadikasa.
3 TO D
IKTUO FMH 66
0
Goodness−of−fit diagnostics
0
log−odds for an edge
−5
−4
−10
−6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 4 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 35 39 43
Sq ma 3.9: Poiìthta prosarmog
tou montèlou 4 gia thn katanom twn
akmiak diamoirasmènwn etarwn kai thn katanom th
gewdaitik
apìstash
.
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 67
Arqzoume loipìn me thn exereÔnhsh tou diktÔou IPRED. Kat' arq n, prèpei
na kataskeusoume to dktuo (mèsw tou R) apì ta emepirik dedomèna pou è-
qoume. Epeid ta dedomèna aut tan diajèsima sto SPSS, mèsw tou Excel, ta
eisaggame sto statnet. AfoÔ loipìn fort¸soume ta dedomèna, proqwrme
sth melèth tou diktÔou.
Network attributes:
vertices: 289
directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
total edges= 424
density = 0.01018839
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 68
Vertex attributes:
vertex.names:
Length Class Mode
289 character character
IPRED_Actor_Coalitions:
IPRED_Positions:
• Summaqe dr¸ntwn.
• Onìmata dr¸ntwn.
Gia na proume ton pl rh arijmì twn sunistws¸n (anloga tou megèjou
),
ekteloÔme:
R> table(component.dist(ipn)$csize)
me apotèlesma:
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 69
289
1
'Etsi, blèpoume ìti uprqei mia mìno meglh sunist¸sa me 289 dr¸nte
. 'Ara,
den uprqoun memonwmènoi dr¸nte
.
R> plot(ipn,vertex.col="IPRED_Actor_Types"))
kai
R> plot(ipn,vertex.col=""IPRED_Positions""))
Ta sq mata, pou prokÔptoun, fanontai sthn epìmenh selda.
R> ipn.degreedist<-table(degree(ipn,cmode="indegree"))
R> ipn.degreedist
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 70
me apotelèsmata:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 14 15
216 30 5 7 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 2 1
16 18 41 44 59 61 72
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R> summary(ipn~edges+triangle)
parnoume:
edges triangle
424 197
R> mixingmatrix(ipn,"IPRED_Actor_Types")
R> mixingmatrix(ipn,"IPRED_Positions")
Sth sunèqeia, ja knoume akrib¸ thn dia melèth kai gia to dktuo SWPAT.
Arqik h metonomasa:
R> summary(swn)
Network attributes:
vertices: 691
directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
total edges= 1004
density = 0.004211498
Vertex attributes:
vertex.names:
Length Class Mode
691 character character
SWPAT_Actor_Coalitions:
ALDE BSA COM EconomicMajorityCom
1 53 1 98
EDRi EICTA EICTA-SMEs
1 91 53
EPP-ED Eurolinux FFII Greens-EFA
1 286 1 1
GUE-NGL Independent MEP
1 1 1
Other-Unknown PatentFreiDe PSE UEN
84 15 1 1
SWPAT_Actor_Types:
Firm Indiv MEP-Party Orgs
533 9 8 141
SWPAT_Positions:
Contra Neutral Pro
407 70 214
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 73
R> table(component.dist(swn)$csize)
parnoume:
691
1
Pli uprqei mia meglh sunist¸sa me 691 dr¸nte
kai kajìlou memonwmènoi
dr¸nte
.
R> plot(swn)
R> plot(SWPAT,vertex.col="swn_Actor_Types"))
R> plot(SWPAT,vertex.col="swn_Positions"))
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 74
parnoume:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15
588 26 7 6 7 1 10 5 10 6 3 3 2 2
R> summary(swn~edges+triangle)
dnei:
edges triangle
1004 723
R> mixingmatrix(swn,"SWPAT_Actor_Types")
kai
R> mixingmatrix(swn,"SWPAT_Positions")
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 7
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -4.57627 0.04881 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
exp(log−odds)
P = .
(1 + exp(log−odds))
R> exp(-4.57627)/(1+exp(-4.57627))
[1] 0.01018835
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 77
Autì pou gnwrzoume kai perimènoume na isqÔei enai ìti, epeid douleÔoume
me montèlo akm¸n, h pijanìthta Ôparxh
mia
akm
ja enai sqedìn sh me
thn puknìthta tou diktÔou, gegonì
to opoo epalhjeÔetai, ìpw
mporoÔme na
doÔme me thn entol summary(ipn), apì thn opoa parnoume thn puknìthta
sh me 0.01018839.
dnei:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 7
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -5.5291 0.1071 NA < 1e-04
*** nodematch.IPRED_actor_types 0.2967 0.0986 NA
0.00263 ** nodematch.IPRED_Positions 1.4363 0.1088 NA <
1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
R> model2$coef
edges nodematch.IPRED_Actor_Types nodematch.IPRED_Positions
-5.5290993 0.2966679 1.4363335
• P (θ) = 0.003953868,
• P (θ1 ) = 0.005312155,
• P (θ2 ) = 0.01641892,
• P (θ3 ) = 0.02196494.
Sth sunèqeia, knoume thn dia akrib¸
melèth kai gia to dktuo SWPAT.
PragmatopoioÔme thn arqik prosarmog se èna montèlo akm¸n:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 8
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 79
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -5.46572 0.03163 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
Sto dktuo autì èqoume ìti log−odds = −5.46572 kai antstoiqh pijanìthta:
Pli perimènoume h pijanìthta Ôparxh
mia
akm
na enai sqedìn sh me thn
puknìthta tou diktÔou, gegonì
to opoo epalhjeÔetai, ìpw
mporoÔme na
doÔme me thn entol summary(swn), apì thn opoa parnoume thn puknìthta
sh me 0.004211498.
dnei:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Newton-Raphson iterations: 8
Pseudolikelihood Results:
4 TA D
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 80
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
R> model2$coef
• P (θ) = 0.002628387,
• P (θ1 ) = 0.0003878042,
• P (θ2 ) = 0.02005366,
• P (θ3 ) = 0.003003542.
5 Parrthma
5.1 To Peribllon R
5.1.1 Genik Parousash
Sto parrthma autì ja knoume mia polÔ sÔntomh parousash tou peribllon-
to
R, to opoo apotele èna oloklhrwmèno pakèto eleÔjerou logismikoÔ, pou
qrhsimopoietai gia th diaqerish dedomènwn, upologismoÔ
, grafikè
anapa-
rastsei
kai gia statistikè
analÔsei
(Venables & Smith, 2008 [42]). To
peribllon R diatjetai eleÔjera apì ton istìtopo http://cran.r.org/.
$ mkdir work
$ cd work
$ R
$ q()
$ help(solve)
$ ?solve
Se pollè
ekdìsei
tou, tìso se peribllon UNIX ìso kai Windows, to R pa-
rèqei ènan mhqanismì anklhsh
kai epanektèlesh
prohgoÔmenwn entol¸n.
Autì gnetai me to pl ktro tou pnw bèlou
.
5 PAR
ARTHMA 83
$ source ("Commands.R")
5.1.2 Pakèta
'Ole
oi sunart sei
tou R, kaj¸
kai ta sÔnola twn dedomènwn, enai apojhk-
eumèna se pakèta (packages). Mìno ìtan fort¸noume èna pakèto, ta peri-
eqìmen tou enai diajèsima. To R prosfèrei th dunatìthta se proqwrhmènou
epipèdou qr ste
na dhmiourg soun ta dik tou
pakèta, kti pou profan¸
fanetai na enai idiatera eÔqrhsto. Epeid ìmw
sto parrthma autì knou-
me apl¸
mia eisagwg sto R, de ja anaferjoÔme sto exeidikeumèno autì jèma.
Gia na doÔme t¸ra poia pakèta enai diajèsima, ekteloÔme thn entol :
$ library(),
qwr
kpoio ìrisma mèsa sti
parenjèsei
. Gia na fort¸soume èna sugkekri-
mèno pakèto, p.q., to boot, ekteloÔme thn entol :
$ library(boot)
$ help.start(),
5.1.3 DianÔsmata
'Opw
kai stou
pragmatikoÔ
arijmoÔ
, ètsi kai sta dianÔsmata, oi stoiqei-
¸dei
arijmhtiko telestè
enai oi + , - , * , / kai ˆ.
sqrt(-17)
sqrt(-17 + 0i)
$ seq(-5, 5, by=.2)
TRUE, ìtan to x enai megalÔtero tou 13 kai thn tim FALSE, ìtan to x enai
mikrìtero tou 13.
Bibliografa
[1℄ Anderson, C.J., Wasserman, S., & Crouch, B. (1999). A p∗ primer: logit
models for social networks. Social Networks, 21, 37-66.
[2] Besag, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of latti-
ce systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, 96-127.
[3] Besag, J.E. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. The Stati-
stician, 24, 179-195.
[4] Boudourides, M., & Haunss, S. (2008). A social network analysis of two
European intellectual property conflicts. Paper presended at the 2008
ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Rennes, 11-16 April 2008.
[6] Feld, S. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Jour-
nal of Sociology, 86, 1015-1035.
[8] Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the Ame-
rican Statistical Association, 81, 832-842.
[9] Goodreau, S.M., Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., & Butts, C.T. (2006).
Statnet Tutorial, Sunbelt XXVI, Vancouver BC, 26 April 2006.
[10] Goodreau, S.M., Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., Butts, C.T., & Morris,
M. (2008). A Statnet Tutorial. Journal of Statistical Software, 24, 1-26.
[11] Handcock, M.S. (2003). Statistical models for social networks: dege-
neracy and inference. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.),
Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis. Washington, DC: Na-
tional Academies Press, pp. 229-240.
[12] Handcock, M., Hunter, D., Butts, C., Goodreau, S., & Morris, M.
(2006). Statnet: An R Package for the Statistical Analysis and Simu-
lation of Social Networks. Manual. University of Washington. URL:
http://www.csde.washington.edu/statnet.
[27] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Woolcock, J. (2004). Models for social
networks with missing data. Social Networks, 26, 257-283.
[28] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Woolcock, J. (2005). Social networks
and small worlds. American Journal of Sociology 110, 894-936.
[29] Robins, G.L., & Pattison, P.E. (2005). Interdependencies and social
processes: generalized dependence structures. In: P. Carrington, J.
Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and Methods in Social Netw-
ork Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192-214.
[30] Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007a). An Introdu-
ction to Exponential Random Graph (p∗ ) Models for Social Networks.
Social Networks, 29, 173-191.
[31] Robins, G., Snijders, T., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P.
(2007b). Recent Developments in Exponential Random Graph (p∗ ) Mo-
dels for Social Networks. Social Networks, 29, 192-215.
[32] Robins, G.L., Elliott, P., & Pattison, P.E. (2001a). Network models for
social selection processes. Social Networks, 23, 1-30.
[33] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Elliott, P. (2001b). Network models for
social influence processes. Psychometrika, 66, 161-190.
[34] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models
and logistic regressions for social networks. III. Valued relations. Ps-
ychometrika, 64, 371-394.
[35] Schweinberger, M., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2003). Settings in social netw-
orks: a measurement model. Sociological Methodology, 33, 307-341.
[36] Skvoretz, J., & Faust, K. (1999). Logit models for affiliation networks.
Sociological Methodology, 29, 253-280.
[37] Snijders, T.A.B. (2002). Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of ex-
ponential random graph models. Journal of Social Structure, 3, 2.
[38] Snijders, T.A.B., Pattison, P., Robins, G.L., & Handcock, M. (2006).
New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological
Methodology, 36, 99-153.
[40] Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudo-likelihood estimation for social
networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 204-212.
BIBLIOGRAF
IA 89
[41] Van Duijn, M.A.J., Snijders, T.A.B., & Zijlstra, B.J.H. (2004). p2 : A
random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Statistica Ne-
erlandica, 58, 234-254.
[42] Venables, W. N., Smith, D.M., & the R Development Core Team (2008).
An Introduction to R, Version 2.6.2.
[43] Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P.E. (1996). Logit models and logistic re-
gressions for social networks. I. An introduction to Markov graphs and
p∗. Psychometrika, 61, 401-425.