You are on page 1of 99

PANEPISTHMIO PATRWN

TMHMA MAJHMATIKWN

METAPTUQIAKO PROGRAMMA SPOUDWN:


MAJHMATIKA TWN UPOLOGISTWN KAI
UPOLOGISTIKH NOHMOSUNH

DIPLWMATIKH ERGASIA

P P
D M
ROSARMOGH, ROSOMOIWSH

E T
KAI IAGNWSH ONTELWN

G
KJETIKWN UQAIWN

RAFHMATWN

QRHSTOS I. BRAQNOS

Epiblèpwn

MWUSHS A. MPOUNTOURIDHS

Anaplhrwt  Kajhght 

PATRA, IOUNIOS 2009


Stou gone mou,
Eustrata kai Iwˆnnh.
Euqariste
Ja  jela, prin apì thn arq  th paroÔsa diplwmatik  ergasa , na epishmˆ-
nw kai na euqarist sw ek bajèwn tou anjr¸pou , pou o kajèna me ton dikì
tou trìpo, ete jewrhtikˆ ete praktikˆ, me bo jhsan katˆ th diˆrkeia th
suggraf  th .

Arqikˆ anafèrw ton epiblèponta kajhght  mou k. Mwus  Mpountourdh. H


sunergasa ma tìso se proptuqiakì ìso kai se metaptuqiakì eppedo up rxe
pragmatikˆ idanik . H olokl rwsh tou metaptuqiakoÔ mou dipl¸mato eid-
keush , me th sugkekrimènh diplwmatik  ergasa, ègine antikeimenikˆ efikt 
lìgw tou anidioteloÔ endiafèronto tou k. Mpountourdh, allˆ kai th mÔh-
sh mou sto sugkekrimèno kai sqetikˆ anexereÔnhto q¸ro twn Majhmatik¸n,
mia epist mh , pou pollo ˆnjrwpoi jewroÔn koresmènh, allˆ telikˆ den e-
nai.

'Ena ek bajèwn euqarist¸ sthn oikogèneiˆ mou kai pio sugkekrimèna stou
gone mou, Eustrata kai Iwˆnnh, pou qwr autoÔ , me aplˆ kai litˆ lìgia, de
ja briskìmoun sthn euqˆristh jèsh na sa parajètw t¸ra autè ti lèxei .
Ousiastik , epiplèon, up rxe kai h bo jeia th upìloiph oikogèneia mou,
pou me endiafèron agkˆliasan kˆti pou pragmatikˆ agapˆw: ta Majhmatikˆ.

En suneqea, ja  jela na anafèrw tou kajhghtè mou sto Panepist mio Pa-


tr¸n, k. Dhm trio Kabbada kai k. Flippo Alebzo, gia thn axiolìghsh th
ergasa mou. Oi parathr sei tou sgoura epèferan mia pio oloklhrwmènh
kai swst  èreuna sto sugkekrimèno tomèa.

En katakledi, ofelw èna megˆlo euqarist¸ sto flo kai sunˆdelfo Miqa l
Epitropˆkh, didaktorikì foitht  tou tm mato Majhmatik¸n tou Panepisth-
mou Patr¸n. H anidiotel  arwg  kai oi parathr sei tou, ìson aforˆ ton
trìpo suggraf  th ergasa , up rxan polÔ ousiastikè .
Perieqìmena
Eisagwg  1

1 Montèla Ekjetik¸n Tuqawn Grafhmˆtwn Markov 3


1.1 H Logik  twn Montèlwn Ekjetik¸n Tuqawn
Grafhmˆtwn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1.1 Genikì Plasio Kataskeu  Montèlwn . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2 H Genik  Morf  twn Montèlwn Ekjetik¸n
Tuqawn Grafhmˆtwn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.2.1 Periorismo Paramètrwn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.3 Upojèsei Exart sewn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.3.1 Graf mata Bernoulli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.3.2 Duadikˆ Montèla . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.3.3 Tuqaa Graf mata Markov . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.3.4 Domè Exart sewn me Metablhtè pˆnw stou
Kìmbou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.3.5 Pio PolÔploke Upojèsei Exˆrthsh . . . . . . . . . 18
1.4 Ektmhsh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.4.1 Ektmhsh Yeudo-Pijanofˆneia . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.4.2 Ektmhsh Monte Carlo Mègisth Pijanofˆneia gia thn
Alusda Markov (MCMCMLE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.5 Nèe Prodiagrafè . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1.5.1 Enallassìmena k-Astèria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1.5.2 Enallassìmena k-Trgwna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
1.5.3 Enallassìmene k-2-Diadromè . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.5.4 Enallaktikè IsodÔname Parametrikopoi sei . . . . . 28
1.5.5 Nèe Prodiagrafè gia Kateujunìmena Graf mata . . . 29

2 To Dktuo Florentine 31
2.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.2 Prosarmog  Montèlou EkjetikoÔ Tuqaou
Graf mato . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2.3 Statistikè DiktÔou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.4 Prosomowsh DiktÔou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.5 Prosarmog  Montèlou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.6 Ekfulismì kai Diagnwstikˆ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

3 To Dktuo FMH 43
3.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3.2 Prosarmog  Montèlou EkjetikoÔ Tuqaou
Graf mato . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
3.3 Anagn¸rish EkfulismoÔ tou Montèlou . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.4 Mh Ekfulismèna Montèla Duadik  Exˆrthsh . . . . . . . . 58

i
3.5 Poiìthta Prosarmog  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61

4 Ta Dktua IPRED kai SWPAT 67


4.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔwn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.2 Prosarmog  Montèlwn Ekjetik¸n Tuqawn
Grafhmˆtwn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76

5 Parˆrthma 81
5.1 To Peribˆllon R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.1.1 Genik  Parousash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.1.2 Pakèta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
5.1.3 DianÔsmata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

Bibliografa 86

ii
Katˆlogo Sqhmˆtwn
1.1 Sqhmatismo kai parˆmetroi gia ta montèla tuqawn grafhmˆ-
twn Markov. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.2 (A-H) Sqhmatismo gia èna montèlo qarakthristik¸n Markov
montèlo koinwnik  epilog  graf mato Markov. . . . . . 17
1.3 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1.4 2-, 3- kai 4-anexˆrthte 2-diadromè . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.5 Kateujunìmena 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.1 To dktuo Flomarriage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.2 H prosomowsh tou prosarmosmènou diktÔou Flomarriage. . . 39
2.3 Diˆgnwsh poiìthta prosarmog  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
3.1 To dktuo FMH qwr ti memonwmène korufè . . . . . . . . . 45
3.2 To dktuo FMH me ti memonwmène korufè . . . . . . . . . . . 46
3.3 To dktuo FMH (qwr ti memonwmène korufè ) me ti koru-
fè qrwmatismène anˆloga th bajmologa twn majht¸n. . . 47
3.4 SÔgkrish katanom  bajm¸n metaxÔ twn diktuak¸n dedomènwn
FMH kai tou deÔterou montèlou (model 2). . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.5 Diagnwstik  MCMC tou trtou montèlou. . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.6 SÔgkrish montèlwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
3.7 SÔgkrish trig¸nwn se 100 prosomoi¸sei tou montèlou 4 (i-
stìgramma) kai twn arqik¸n dedomènwn (kìkkino bèlo ). . . . 63
3.8 Poiìthta prosarmog  gia bajmoÔ tou montèlou 4. . . . . . . 64
3.9 Poiìthta prosarmog  tou montèlou 4 gia thn katanom  twn
akmiakˆ diamoirasmènwn etarwn kai thn katanom  th gewdai-
tik  apìstash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
4.1 To dktuo IPRED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
4.2 To dktuo IPRED qrwmatismèno anˆloga me to qarakthristikì
tou tÔpou twn dr¸ntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.3 To dktuo IPRED qrwmatismèno anˆloga me to qarakthristikì
twn topojet sewn twn dr¸ntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.4 To dktuo SWPAT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
4.5 To dktuo SWPAT qrwmatismèno anˆloga me to qarakthristi-
kì tou tÔpou twn dr¸ntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.6 To dktuo SWPAT qrwmatismèno anˆloga me to qarakthristi-
kì twn topojet sewn twn dr¸ntwn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

iii
1

Eisagwg 
H paroÔsa diplwmatik  ergasa brsketai ston eurÔtero q¸ro th majhmati-
k  statistik  jewra twn grafhmˆtwn. KÔrio stìqo ma , ìpw anafè-
rei kai o ttlo , enai h montelopohsh grafhmˆtwn, me ap¸tero skopì thn
prosarmog , prosomowsh kai diˆgnwsh aut¸n mèsw montèlwn ekjetik¸n tu-
qawn grafhmˆtwn.

To pr¸to kefˆlaio dnei mia sunoptik  parousash th diatÔpwsh tou probl -


mato kai th jewra twn montèlwn twn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn. H
basik  idèa enai na jewr soume w tuqae metablhtè tou dunatoÔ desmoÔ
metaxÔ twn kìmbwn enì dojènto graf mato . H genik  morf  enì montè-
lou ekjetikˆ tuqaou graf mato kajorzetai apì kˆpoie upojèsei sqetikè
me ti exart sei metaxÔ aut¸n twn tuqawn metablht¸n. Parousiˆzoume kˆ-
poie diaforetikè upojèsei exˆrthsh kai ta antstoiqa montèla, ìpw ta
grafhmˆta Bernoulli, ta duadik¸ - anexˆrthta kai ta tuqaa graf mata Mar-
kov. Epsh , exetˆzoume thn enswmˆtwsh twn qarakthristik¸n, pou mporoÔn
na èqoun oi kìmboi, se montèla koinwnik  epilog  , dhlad , se peript¸sei
pou oi sundèsei tou graf mato mporoÔn na problèyoun ta qarakthristikˆ
twn kìmbwn. Sunoyzoume kˆpoie kainoÔrgie upojèsei exˆrthsh , pou enai
poluplokìtere twn pr¸twn tètoiwn upojèsewn th sqetik  bibliografa .
SuzhtoÔme ti diadikase th statistik  ektmhsh , sumperilambanomènwn
twn nèwn mejìdwn gia thn ektmhsh th mègisth pijanofˆneia Monte Carlo.
Tèlo , parousiˆzoume ti nèe prodiagrafè gia montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn
grafhmˆtwn, pou èqoun protenei oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38], oi opoe bel-
ti¸noun shmantikˆ ta apotelèsmata th prosarmog  empeirik¸n dedomènwn
gia ekjetikˆ montèla omoiogen¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Markov. Epiplèon, oi
nèe autè prodiagrafè ma bohjoÔn na apofÔgoume to prìblhma tou sqedìn-
ekfulismoÔ, pou suqnˆ parembˆlletai sth diadikasa th prosarmog  montè-
lwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Markov, idiatera ìtan autˆ proèrqontai
apì empeirikˆ dedomèna, pou èqoun uyhlì bajmì metabatikìthta . H melèth
mia tètoia nèa statistik  me uyhlìterh tˆxh metabatikìthta epitrèpei
thn ektmhsh twn paramètrwn twn montèlwn twn ekjetik¸n grafhmˆtwn se
pollè (allˆ ìqi ìle ) peript¸sei , sti opoe diaforetikˆ ja  tan adÔnato
na ektimhjoÔn oi parˆmetroi twn montèlwn twn omoiogen¸n grafhmˆtwn Mar-
kov.

Sto deÔtero, trto kai tètarto kefˆlaio th ergasa efarmìzoume ti parapˆ-


nw mejìdou , antistoqw , gia tre analÔsei empeirik¸n dedomènwn:
2

1. To dktuo Florentine.

2. To dktuo Faux Magnolia High.

3. Ta dktua IPRED kai SWPAT.

Se autˆ ta kefˆlaia, parousiˆzoume ti diadikase th prosarmog  , proso-


mowsh kai diˆgnwsh me parˆjesh twn antstoiqwn entol¸n, qrhsimopoi-
¸nta ta pakèta statnet–ermg kai sna, ta opoa douleÔoun sto peribˆllon
tou pakètou eleÔjerou logismikoÔ R.

Tèlo , sto parˆrthma th ergasa dnoume mia sÔntomh eisagwg  sto peribˆl-
lon R kai se kˆpoie genikè entolè autoÔ.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 3

1 Montèla Ekjetik¸n Tuqawn Grafhmˆtwn


Markov
1.1 H Logik  twn Montèlwn Ekjetik¸n Tuqawn
Grafhmˆtwn

Sto kefˆlaio autì ja akolouj soume ti ergase twn Robins et al. (2007a)


[30], (2007b) [31], gia na d¸soume mia genik  kai sunoptik  parousash twn
montèlwn twn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn.

Onomˆzoume parathroÔmeno dktuo ta empeirikˆ dedomèna enì graf mato  


diktÔou, ta opoa o ereunht  èqei sugkentr¸sei kai endiafèretai na montelo-
poi sei. Basikˆ, tètoia empeirikˆ dedomèna sqhmatzoun èna (koinwnikì) d-
ktuo gia kˆpoio pl jo dr¸ntwn, oi opooi sundèontai metaxÔ tou me kˆ-
poiou desmoÔ . Profan¸ , èna tètoio dktuo anaparstatai apì èna grˆfhma
me kìmbou tou dr¸nte kai akmè   tìxa tou desmoÔ twn dr¸ntwn. Kˆje
parathroÔmeno dktuo jewretai ìti pragmatopoietai apì èna pijanì sÔnolo
diktÔwn me kˆpoia shmantikˆ qarakthristikˆ parìmoia (toulˆqiston gia ton
dio arijmì dr¸ntwn) kai ìti enai to apotèlesma kˆpoiwn stoqastik¸n diadika-
si¸n, ti opoe mpore na mh gnwrzoume. Me ˆlla lìgia, to parathroÔmeno
dktuo antimetwpzetai san mia sugkekrimènh dom  enì pl jou desm¸n, pou
lambˆnontai apì èna megˆlo sÔnolo anˆlogwn pijan¸n dom¸n. Genikˆ, den
xèroume poie stoqastikè diadikase dhmioÔrghsan to parathroÔmeno dktuo
kai o stìqo ma gia th diatÔpwsh enì montèlou enai na mporèsoume na pro-
tenoume kˆpoie alhjofane kai jewrhtikˆ apodektè upojèsei gia autè
ti diadikase .

Gia parˆdeigma, èna apì ta endiafèronta zht mata, enai na broÔme eˆn sto
parathroÔmeno dktuo upˆrqoun perissìtera   ligìtera shmantikˆ domikˆ qa-
rakthristikˆ apì autˆ pou ja perimèname se èna tuqao grˆfhma. Upojètoume
ìti mporoÔme na eklˆboume autˆ ta qarakthristikˆ w apotelèsmata th drˆ-
sh kˆpoiwn topik¸n koinwnik¸n diadikasi¸n. Gia parˆdeigma, mporoÔme na
rwt soume -ìpw oi Moreno & Jennings èkanan to 1938 se mia apì ti pr¸te
efarmogè th statistik  sta koinwnikˆ dktua [19℄- eˆn to parathroÔmeno
dktuo fèrei mia isqur  tˆsh gia amoibaiìthta, megalÔterh kai pèra apì thn tu-
qaa katanom  twn kateujunìmenwn desm¸n, eˆn auto sqhmatzontan entel¸
sthn tÔqh. Me ˆlla lìgia, tenoun oi dr¸nte tou parathroÔmenou diktÔou
na sqhmatzoun amoibae (antapodidìmene ) epilogè sqèsewn? Ed¸, to do-
mikì qarakthristikì (oi amoibaoi desmo) enai to apotèlesma mia koinwnik 
diadikasa (ìpw , p.q., ta ˆtoma epilègoun na antapoddoun ti epilogè twn
ˆllwn atìmwn). 'Etsi, san èna aplì parˆdeigma, mporoÔme na jewr soume èna
montèlo stoqastikoÔ diktÔou me dÔo paramètrou , mia pou ekfrˆzei thn tˆsh
gia tuqaou desmoÔ kai epiprìsjeth tˆsh gia amoibaou (antapodidìmenou )
desmoÔ .
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 4

Genikˆ, ta upì suz thsh domikˆ qarakthristikˆ ma bohjoÔn na sqhmatsoume


th morf  tou montèlou. H upìjesh th amoibaa diadikasa ma odhge na
protenoume èna montèlo, sto opoo o dekth tou epipèdou th amoibaiìthta
enai mia parˆmetro tou montèlou. H upìjesh epsh antanaklˆ thn prosdo-
ka na gnwrsoume poio edo diktÔwn enai pio pijanì. 'Ena statistikì montèlo
enì diktÔou gia èna dedomèno sÔnolo dr¸ntwn antistoiqe mia pijanìthta se
ìla ta pijanˆ dktua me autoÔ tou dr¸nte . Gia parˆdeigma, dedomènou ìti
h amoibaiìthta twn desm¸n enai èna suqnˆ parathroÔmeno qarakthristikì se
dktua fila , èna kalì montèlo enai pijanì na upojètei ìti ta dktua me a-
moibaiìthta enai pio pijanˆ kai ìti dktua qwr amoibaiìthta enai pio apjana.

'Opw anafèrame, anaparistoÔme ta dktua san (mh kateujunìmena) graf -


mata kìmbwn kai akm¸n. Gia èna dedomèno montèlo, to sÔnolo twn kìmbwn
jewretai stajerì. To fˆsma twn pijan¸n diktÔwn kai h pijanìthta emfˆni-
s  tou sto montèlo anaparstatai apì mia katanom  pijanot twn pˆnw sto
sÔnolo ìlwn twn pijan¸n grafhmˆtwn me ton dio arijmì kìmbwn. Se aut n
thn katanom  twn grafhmˆtwn, ta graf mata me uyhlˆ eppeda amoibaiìthta
enai pijanì na èqoun megalÔterh pijanìthta apì ìti ta graf mata me asjen 
amoibaiìthta, me ti akribe pijanìthte na exart¸ntai apì thn tim  twn sqe-
tik¸n paramètrwn, ìpw h parˆmetro th amoibaiìthta . Shmei¸noume ìti
to parathroÔmeno dktuo enai èna sugkekrimèno grˆfhma mèsa se aut n thn
katanom  kai, ètsi, èqei mia sugkekrimènh pijanìthta emfˆnish .

Bèbaia, ex arq  , de gnwrzoume poiè timè twn paramètrwn prèpei na qrhsi-


mopoi soume gia na prosdiorsoume ti pijanìthte twn grafhmˆtwn sthn
katanom . O stìqo ma enai na broÔme ti kalÔtere timè (ektim¸nta
ti paramètrou tou montèlou), qrhsimopoi¸nta to parathroÔmeno dktuo w

odhgì. SÔmfwna me to basikì krit rio th megsth pijanofˆneia , epilè-


goume ti timè twn paramètrwn me tètoio trìpo ¸ste o pio pijanì bajmì
amoibaiìthta na enai autì , o opoo lambˆnei q¸ra sto parathroÔmeno d-
ktuo. Eˆn to montèlo èqei parˆmetro amoibaiìthta (orismènh na enai sh me
mhdèn, ìtan oi amoibaoi desmo emfanzontai tuqaa) kai eˆn upˆrqoun pollo
amoibaoi desmo sto parathroÔmeno dktuo, tìte to montèlo, pou apotele
kal  prosarmog  sta dedomèna w pro ton bajmì amoibaiìthta , ja èqei

mia jetik  parˆmetro amoibaiìthta . Eˆn mporèsoume na ektim soume thn pa-


rˆmetro amoibaiìthta gia to parathroÔmeno dktuo kai emaste sgouroi ìti
aut  h parˆmetro enai jetik , tìte mporoÔme na sumperˆnoume ìti upˆrqei
perissìterh amoibaiìthta sto parathroÔmeno dktuo apì aut  pou ja perimè-
name na upˆrqei sto entel¸ tuqao dktuo.

'Otan èqoume orsei thn katanom  pijanot twn se ìlo to sÔnolo twn grafhmˆ-
twn me ton dio arijmì kìmbwn, mporoÔme epsh na sqediˆsoume graf mata,
pou lambˆnontai tuqaa apì thn katanom , sÔmfwna me ti antstoiqe pijanì-
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 5

thtè tou kai mporoÔme epsh na sugkrnoume ta graf mata autˆ me to


parathroÔmeno dktuo, anaforikˆ me opoiod pote ˆllo qarakthristikì ma
endiafèrei. Eˆn to montèlo jewretai mia kal  prosarmog  gia ta dedomèna
ma , tìte ta graf mata, pou lambˆnontai deigmatolhptikˆ, ja moiˆzoun me to
parathroÔmeno se sqèsh me pollè diaforetikè apìyei . Se aut n thn idanik 
perptwsh, mporoÔme na upojèsoume ìti ta montelopoihmèna domikˆ fainìmena
ja mporoÔsan na exhg soun thn anˆdush tou diktÔou. Epsh , mporoÔme na
exetˆsoume ti idiìthte twn grafhmˆtwn, pou lambˆnontai deigmatolhptikˆ,
gia na katano soume th fÔsh twn diktÔwn, pou enai pio pijanˆ na emfani-
stoÔn kˆtw apì autˆ ta fainìmena.

San parˆdeigma, a jewr soume th sqèsh th fila se mia sqolik  tˆxh. To


parathroÔmeno dktuo enai to dktuo, gia to opoo èqoume metr sei ti fili-
kè sqèsei (metaxÔ twn majht¸n th tˆxh ). Upˆrqoun pollˆ pijanˆ dktua,
pou ja mporoÔsan na èqoun parathrhje se aut n th sugkekrimènh tˆxh. E-
xetˆzoume thn parathroÔmenh filik  dom  sthn tˆxh sto plasio ìlwn twn
dunat¸n dom¸n fila se aut n thn tˆxh. Merikè domè enai pio pijanè apì
kˆpoie ˆlle kai to sÔnolo ìlwn twn pijan¸n dom¸n me kˆpoie upojèsei
gia ti antstoiqe pijanìthtè enai mia katanom  pijanot twn grafhmˆtwn.
TopojetoÔme to parathroÔmeno dktuo mèsa se aut n thn katanom , ant na
to sugkrnoume me ˆlla dktua fila ˆllwn sqolik¸n tˆxewn. (Bebaw , to
montèlo ma gia to parathroÔmeno dktuo mpore na enai èna kalì montèlo
kai gia ˆlle sqolikè tˆxei , allˆ den enai autì to jèma ed¸).

A parathr soume ìti h upìjesh, pou kˆnoume, enai ìti to dktuo dhmiourge-


tai apì mia stoqastik  diadikasa, sthn opoa oi sqesiako desmo emfanzontai
me trìpou , pou mpore na diamorf¸nontai apì thn parousa   thn apousa twn
ˆllwn desm¸n (kai pijanìn apì ta qarakthristikˆ twn kìmbwn). Me ˆlla lì-
gia, to dktuo gnetai antilhptì w èna autoorganoÔmeno sÔsthma sqesiak¸n
desm¸n. Ousiastikˆ, isqurizìmaste ìti upˆrqoun topikè koinwnikè diadika-
se , pou parˆgoun ti duadikè sqèsei kai ìti autè oi koinwnikè diadikase
mporoÔn na exart¸ntai apì to genikìtero koinwnikì peribˆllon. Gia parˆdeig-
ma, mporoÔme na upojèsoume ìti oi dr¸nte me parìmoia qarakthristikˆ enai
pio pijanì na dhmiourg soun desmoÔ fila (katˆstash pou onomˆzetai o-
moiofila)   ìti, eˆn duo mh sundedemènoi dr¸nte sundèontai me ènan trto
dr¸nta, enai pijanì na dhmiourg soun èna desmì fila kai metaxÔ tou (ka-
tˆstash pou onomˆzetai metabatikìthta). ParathroÔme ìti epiprìsjeta me
thn upìjesh th stoqastikìthta , h w t¸ra perigraf  ma uponoetai ìti
enai epsh mia dunamik  perigraf  qronikˆ metaballìmenh.

1.1.1 Genikì Plasio Kataskeu  Montèlwn

Deqìmeno thn Ôparxh enì montèlou ekjetikoÔ tuqaou graf mato gia è-


na koinwnikì dktuo, o ereunht  prèpei, sth sunèqeia, na akolouj sei ta
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 6

parakˆtw pènte b mata. En¸ to endiafèron th èreuna brsketai sto teli-


kì b ma th ektmhsh kai th ermhnea twn paramètrwn, sta prohgoÔmena
tèssera b mata o ereunht  kˆnei kˆpoie sugkekrimène epilogè gia thn
anˆlush twn dedomènwn. Kai ìpw ja doÔme parakˆtw, sta pr¸ta b mata
mporoÔme na entopsoume kˆpoia apì ta palaiìtera montèla mèsa sth genikì-
terh kathgora twn montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn.

B ma Pr¸to: Oi desmo w tuqae metablhtè

Autì to b ma emperièqei èna stoqastikì plasio gia thn anˆlush grafhmˆ-
twn me stajerì sÔnolo kìmbwn. Upojètonta ìti kˆje desmì tou diktÔou
jewretai w mia tuqaa metablht , den ennooÔme ìti oi ˆnjrwpoi sqhmatzoun
koinwnikè sqèsei me ton dio trìpo: kˆpoie sqèsei mpore na enai pio pija-
nè . Antjeta, apl¸ lème ìti de gnwrzoume ta pˆnta gia ton sqhmatismì twn
sqèsewn, ìti to montèlo ma den prìkeitai na kˆnei tèleie nteterministikè
problèyei kai ìti, epomènw , ja upˆrqei kˆpoio stoqastikì jìrubo   kˆ-
poia èlleiyh kanonikìthta , pou de ja mporoÔme na exhg soume ikanopoihtikˆ.

Jewr¸nta tou diktuakoÔ desmoÔ w tuqae metablhtè , mènei na xanajumh-


joÔme kˆpoiou basikoÔ sqetikoÔ sumbolismoÔ . Gia kˆje i kai j, pou enai
diakritˆ mèlh enì sÔnolou N apì n dr¸nte , èqoume mia tuqaa metablht 
Yij , ìpou Yij = 1 eˆn upˆrqei desmì apì to dr¸nta i sto dr¸nta j kai ìpou
Yij = 0 eˆn den upˆrqei tètoio desmì . Sugkekrimenopoi¸nta to yij w thn
parathroÔmenh tim  th metablht  Yij , èstw Y o pnaka ìlwn twn metablh-
t¸n kai y o pnaka twn parathroÔmenwn desm¸n, dhlad , to parathroÔmeno
dktuo. Bebaw , to y mpore epsh na ermhneuje san èna grˆfhma sto sÔ-
nolo twn kìmbwn N , me to sÔnolo twn akm¸n na kajorzetai apì ta zeugˆria
(i, j), gia ta opoa yij = 1. To Y mpore na enai kateujunìmeno (opìte to
Yij enai diaforetikì apì to Yji )     mh kateujunìmeno (opìte Yij = Yji kai
oi dÔo metablhtè enai oi die ). Mpore epsh oi desmo tou y na parnoun
timè , allˆ sthn paroÔsa ergasa ja perioristoÔme mìno sthn perptwsh twn
duadik¸n desm¸n.

B ma DeÔtero: H upìjesh exˆrthsh kai h tuqaa sunˆfeia metaxÔ twn di-

ktuak¸n metablht¸n

H upìjesh aut  enswmat¸nei ti topikè koinwnikè diadikase , pou upot-


jetai ìti dhmiourgoÔn tou desmoÔ tou diktÔou. Gia parˆdeigma, oi desmo
mpore na upotejoÔn ìti enai anexˆrthtoi o èna apì ton ˆllo, ìpw , p.q.,
ìtan oi ˆnjrwpoi sundèontai metaxÔ tou anexˆrthta apì tou ˆlllou koi-
nwnikoÔ desmoÔ pou èqoun. Aut  den enai sun jw mia polÔ realistik 
upìjesh. Sto parˆdeigma th sqolik  tˆxh , ìpou lambˆnoun q¸ra diadika-
se amoibaiìthta , eˆn o majht  A sumpaje to majht  B, tìte jewretai
arketˆ pijanì ìti kai o majht  B ja sumpaje to majht  A, kˆti to opoo
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 7

sunepˆgetai mia morf  duadik  exˆrthsh . Oi desmo mpore epsh na e-


xart¸ntai apì ta qarakthristikˆ twn dr¸ntwn, ìpw , gia parˆdeigma, ìtan
upˆrqoun pijanè omoiofilikè epidrˆsei sth sqolik  tˆxh. ParathroÔme ìti
kˆje mia apì autè ti diadikase mpore na anaparastaje apì èna stoiqei¸-
de (mikr  klmaka ) grˆfhma: gia parˆdeigma, apì mia duˆda, pou apotele
ènan amoibao (antapodidìmeno) desmì   apì èna desmì metaxÔ duo koritsi¸n
(tou idou qarakthristikoÔ twn dr¸ntwn).

B ma Trto: H upìjesh exˆrthsh kai h idiaterh morf  tou montèlou

Mpore na apodeiqje ìti kˆpoie kal¸ orismène upojèsei exˆrthsh sune-


pˆgontai mia idiaterh klˆsh montèlwn (to je¸rhma Hammersley-Clifford [2]).
Kˆje parˆmetro antistoiqe se èna sqhmatismì sto dktuo, dhlad , se èna
mikrì uposÔnolo apì pijanoÔ desmoÔ tou diktÔou (kai/  qarakthristikˆ
twn dr¸ntwn). Auto oi sqhmatismo enai ta domikˆ qarakthristikˆ pou ma
endiafèroun (p.q., oi amoibaoi desmo). To montèlo tìte anaparistˆ mia ka-
tanom  tuqawn grafhmˆtwn, ta opoa upotjetai ìti dhmiourgoÔntai apì ti
topikè domè , pou anaparstantai apì tou sqhmatismoÔ . Gia parˆdeigma,
èna aplì desmì enai èna sqhmatismì , ìpw mpore na enai kai èna a-
moibao desmì (se èna kateujunìmeno grˆfhma), mia metabatik  triˆda, èna
2-astèri k.o.k. Oi parˆmetroi, pou sqetzontai me thn parousa kˆje enì apì
autoÔ tou sqhmatismoÔ sto parathroÔmeno grˆfhma, mporoÔn na sumperi-
lambˆnontai sto montèlo.

B ma Tètarto: Aplopohsh twn paramètrwn mèsw omoiogèneia   ˆllwn pe-

riorism¸n

Gia na orsoume èna montèlo xekˆjara, prèpei na mei¸soume ton arijmì twn
paramètrwn. Autì suqnˆ epitugqˆnetai epibˆllonta kˆpoiou periorismoÔ
omoiogèneia . Sthn pragmatikìthta, exetˆzoume eˆn kˆpoie parˆmetroi prè-
pei na exiswjoÔn   na susqetistoÔn alli¸ . Gia parˆdeigma, sun jw pro-
tenetai mia parˆmetro gia to fainìmeno th amoibaiìthta pˆnw se ìlo to
dktuo, upojètonta ìti oi parˆmetroi amoibaiìthta gia kˆje pijanì amoibao
(antapodidìmeno) desmì enai ìle se . Pio kˆtw, ja mil soume gia tou pe-
riorismoÔ twn paramètrwn se sugkekrimèna paradegmata montèlwn

B ma Pèmpto: Ektmhsh kai ermhnea twn paramètrwn tou montèlou

Bebaw h ektmhsh kai h ermhnea sun jw gnontai sto plasio sugkekri-


mènwn efarmog¸n th èreuna kai, ìtan ja èqoume ftˆsei se autì to b ma,
ennoetai ìti ta prohgoÔmena tèssera b mata èqoun  dh pragmatopoihje, è-
stw kai ˆrrhta. Autì to b ma periplèketai eˆn h dom  exˆrthsh enai po-
lÔplokh, ìpw pijan¸ qreiˆzetai na enai gia kˆje realistikì montèlo. 'E-
qonta upologsei ti ektim sei twn paramètrwn, kaj¸ kai ti ektim sei
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 8

th abebaiìthta , mporoÔme na qrhsimopoi soume to statistikì montèlo tou


dktuo, pou èqei kataskeuaste apì sugkekrimène upojèsei exˆrthsh kai
pou èqei ektimhje apì ta parathroÔmena diktuakˆ dedomèna. Gia parˆdeigma,
mporoÔme na diereun soume to pedo ìlwn twn pijan¸n diktÔwn, pou problè-
pontai apì to montèlo, èna b ma, pou mpore na bohj sei sthn axiolìghsh
tou montèlou, kai mporoÔme na bgˆloume sumperˆsmata gia ti paramètrou
tou montèlou. P.q., mporoÔme na sumperˆnoume eˆn opoiad pote parˆmetro
tou montèlou enai mh mhdenik  kai, me ton trìpo autì eˆn o antstoiqo
sqhmatismì emfanzetai sto parathroÔmeno grˆfhma, se megalÔtero   mi-
krìtero bajmì apì ìti ja perimèname sthn tÔqh, dojèntwn twn tim¸n twn
ˆllwn paramètrwn ìpw ja suzht soume parakˆtw to jèma th ektmhsh
twn paramètrwn.

1.2 H Genik  Morf  twn Montèlwn Ekjetik¸n


Tuqawn Grafhmˆtwn

Ta montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn èqoun thn akìloujh morf :


! ( )
1 X
Pr(Y = y) = exp ηA gA (y) (1)
κ
A

ìpou (i) to ˆjroisma enai pˆnw se ìlou tou sqhmatismoÔ A, (ii) ηA enai
h parˆmetro , pou antistoiqe sto sqhmatismì A (kai enai mh mhdenik  mìno
eˆn ìla ta zeugˆria twn metablht¸n sto A upoteje ìti enai upì sunj kh
1
exarthmèna ), (iii) gA (y) =
yij ∈A yij enai h diktuak  statistik , pou anti-
Q

stoiqe sto sqhmatismì A, gA (y) = 1, eˆn o sqhmatismì parathretai sto


dktuo y, kai enai 0 alli¸ 2 , (iv) to κ enai mia posìthta kanonikopohsh ,
pou exasfalzei ìti h (1) enai mia katˆllhlh katanom  pijanot twn.

'Ola ta montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn enai th morf  th exsw-


sh (1), h opoa perigrˆfei mia genik  katanom  pijanot twn grafhmˆtwn n
kìmbwn. H pijanìthta parat rhsh opoioud pote idiaterou graf mato y
se aut n thn katanom  ddetai apì thn parapˆnw exswsh kai h pijanìthta
aut  enai anexˆrthth kai apì ti statistikè gA (y) sto dktuo y kai apì
ti diˆfore mh mhdenikè paramètrou ηA gia ìlou tou sqhmatismoÔ A
sto montèlo. Oi sqhmatismo mpore na perilambˆnoun amoibaou (antapodi-
dìmenou ) desmoÔ , metabatikè triˆde k.o.k., ètsi ¸ste to montèlo na ma
epitrèpei na exetˆsoume mia poikila pijan¸n domik¸n kanonikot twn.

Giat loipìn oi upojèsei exˆrthsh enai shmantikè ed¸? Oi upojèsei


exˆrthsh sunepˆgwntai thn epilog  diaforetik¸n tÔpwn sqhmatism¸n, sqeti-
1
Dhlad , upì sunj kh sto upìloipo grˆfhma.
2
Grˆfoume gA (y) ant gA , gia na upenjumsoume ìti oi statistikè sqetzontai me to
grˆfhma y.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 9

k¸n me to montèlo. ParathroÔme ìti apì thn parapˆnw perptwsh (ii), oi


parˆmetroi enai mhdèn, opoted pote oi metablhtè sto sqhmatismì enai upì
sunj kh exart¸mene h ma me thn ˆllh. Me ˆlla lìgia, oi mìnoi sqhmatismo,
pou enai sqetiko me to montèlo, enai auto, stou opoou ìloi oi pijano
desmo sto sqhmatismì enai amoibaw exart¸menoi o èna apì ton ˆllo.3

Axzei na parathr soume ìti, eˆn èna sÔnolo pijan¸n akm¸n anaparistˆ è-


na sqhmatismì sto montèlo, tìte h exswsh (1) sunepˆgetai ìti opoiod pote
uposÔnolo pijan¸n akm¸n enai epsh èna sqhmatismì . 'Etsi, oi die oi
akmè enai pˆnta èna sqhmatismì , ìpw ja dexoume parakˆtw.

Epomènw , h upìjesh exˆrthsh enai krsimh gia ton periorismì twn pijan¸n
sqhmatism¸n sto montèlo. Ja d¸soume kˆpoia sugkekrimèna paradegmata
parakˆtw. 'Ena sqhmatismì A anafèretai se èna uposÔnolo metablht¸n,
pou apoteloÔntai apì desmoÔ , kai antistoiqe se mia mikr  diktuak  upodom .
Gia parˆdeigma, eˆn se èna kateujunìmeno dktuo efarmìsoume thn upìjesh
duadik  exˆrthsh , èpetai ìti oi parˆmetroi amoibaiìthta ja sumperilhfjoÔn
sto montèlo. Se aut n thn perptwsh, èna sqhmatismì sto montèlo enai
to sÔnolo twn metablht¸n {Y12 , Y21 }, èna ˆllo enai to sÔnolo {Y13 , Y31 }
k.o.k., me kˆje duˆda na ddei to dikì th sqhmatismì. Profan¸ , gia kˆje
ènan apì autoÔ tou sqhmatismoÔ , eˆn kai oi duo desmo enai parìnte sto
parathroÔmeno grˆfhma, blèpoume ènan amoibao (antapodidìmeno) desmì kai,
gia autì, o sqhmatismì anaparistˆ èna tÔpo diktuak  upodom  , pou mpore
na parathrhje sto grˆfhma y. MporoÔme na skeftoÔme autìn to sqhmatismì
diagrammatikˆ san thn dia thn upodom , dhlad , ton amoibao (antapodidìme-
no) desmì.

Allˆ bebaw , den upˆrqei kama eggÔhsh ìti ìle oi pijanè akmè se èna do-
jèn sqhmatismì ja enai paroÔse se èna pragmatopoioÔmeno grˆfhma y kai,
gia autì, ja parathr soume kˆpoie apì autè ti pijanè upodomè , allˆ ìqi
ˆlle . Meriko desmo mpore na enai amoibaoi (antapodidìmenoi), ˆlloi ìqi.
Oi sqhmatismo anaparistoÔn pijanˆ apotelèsmata. Apì thn ˆllh meriˆ, h
statistik  tou graf mato , gA (y), ma lèei eˆn o sqhmatismì A parathre-
tai pragmatikˆ sto dktuo y. Gia ènan amoibao (antapodidìmeno) sqhmatismì
A, aut  h statistik  aplˆ ma lèei eˆn upˆrqoun amoibaoi (antapodidìmenoi)
desmo metaxÔ twn sqetik¸n zeugari¸n twn kìmbwn   ìqi.

MporoÔme na skeftoÔme ìti ta graf mata sthn katanom , dhmiourgoÔntai apì


autoÔ tou dunhtikˆ epikaluptìmenou sqhmatismoÔ . Gia parˆdeigma, a u-
3
Apì perissìtero teqnik  ˆpoyh , oi upojèsei exˆrthsh mporoÔn na anaparasta-
joÔn apì èna grˆfhma exˆrthsh , to opoo prwtoparousiˆsthke apì tou Frank & Strauss
(1986) [8℄, akolouj¸nta thn prosèggish, pou periègraye o Besag to (1974) [2℄. Oi sqh-
matismo A anaparastoÔntai apì ti klke tou graf mato exˆrthsh . Oi endiaferìmenoi
mporoÔn na anatrèxoun sthn ergasa twn Robins kai Pattison tou (2005) [29℄.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 10

pojèsoume ìti upˆrqei amoibaiìthta sth diadikasa, pou dhmiourge to dktuo.


An ja mporoÔsame na parathr soume thn exèlixh tou diktÔou kai an to dktuo
xekinoÔse me lge amoibae akmè , ja mporoÔsame na anamènoume na doÔme
perissìterou amoibaou desmoÔ na anadÔontai me to pèrasma tou qrìnou.
'Omw , skeptìmenoi katˆ autìn ton trìpo, qreiˆzetai na èqoume upìyh ma
ìti, kaj¸ èna idiatero desmì anadÔetai dia mèsou mia fantastik  dia-
dikasa dhmiourga , h parousa tou mpore na ephreˆsei ˆllou pijanoÔ
geitonikoÔ desmoÔ . Opìte, upˆrqei mia uponooÔmenh dunamik  kai autoor-
ganoÔmenh diadikasa se aut n thn upojetik  kataskeu : kaj¸ èna desmì
anadÔetai   exafanzetai, ˆlloi geitoniko desmo enai pijanìn na anadÔontai
  na exafanzontai parìmoia kai mpore na mhn upˆrqei kanèna ousiastikì tè-
lo se aut n th suneqizìmenh stoqastik  diadikasa. EntoÔtoi , oi idiatere
timè twn paramètrwn ja ephreˆsoun th suqnìthta parat rhsh tou antstoi-
qou sqhmatismoÔ. Eˆn h parˆmetro enai megˆlh kai jetik , perimènoume na
parathr soume ton antstoiqo sqhmatismì se graf mata th katanom  (1)
pio suqnˆ apì ìti eˆn h parˆmetro  tan 0. Dhlad , eˆn mia parˆmetro amoi-
baiìthta enai megˆlh kai jetik , ja perimèname na doÔme polloÔ amoibaou
(antapodidìmenou ) desmoÔ sto parathroÔmeno dktuo. Omow , ìtan mia pa-
rˆmetro enai megˆlh kai arnhtik , perimènoume na doÔme to sqhmatismì (twn
amoibawn desm¸n) sqetikˆ ligìtero suqnˆ apì ìti eˆn h parˆmetro  tan 0.

Epeid  h exswsh (1) perilambˆnei ènan ekjetikì ìro sto dexiì mèlo th ,
tètoie katanomè anafèrontai san montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn.
Ta tuqaa graf mata Markov twn Frank & Strauss (1986) [8℄ apoteloÔn mia
sugkekrimènh klˆsh twn montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn. Merikè
forè ta montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn anafèrontai w montèla p∗ ,
epeid  apoteloÔn mia genkeush twn montèlwn duadik  anexarthsa , èna apì
ta pr¸ta dhmofil  paradegmata twn opown  tan ta montèla p1 twn Holland
& Leinhardt (1981) [13℄.

1.2.1 Periorismo Paramètrwn

ParathroÔme ìti h exswsh (1) anafèretai se diaforetikoÔ sqhmatismoÔ su-


nìlwn me diaforetikoÔ kìmbou . Gia parˆdeigma, se montèla th amoibaiìth-
ta , upˆrqei èna xeqwristì sqhmatismì gia to sÔnolo {Y12 , Y21 }   gia to
sÔnolo {Y13 , Y31 } k.o.k. Tìte, se aut n thn genik  morf , to montèlo em-
perièqei pollè paramètrou . P.q., upˆrqoun n(n − 1)/2 parˆmetroi gia thn
amoibaiìthta.

Autè enai, profan¸ , pollè parˆmetroi kai to montèlo de mpore na ektimh-


je apì mia monadik  diktuak  parat rhsh. Merikè parˆmetroi prèpei na
mhdenistoÔn   na exiswjoÔn metaxÔ tou   na perioristoÔn katˆ kˆpoio ˆllo
trìpo. Akolouj¸nta tou Frank & Strauss (1986) [8℄, suqnˆ efarmìzou-
me mia upìjesh omoiogèneia , exis¸nonta ti paramètrou gia ton dio tÔpo
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 11

sqhmatismoÔ. Gia parˆdeigma, jewr¸nta th sqèsh th amoibaiìthta , o PaÔ-


lo mpore na tenei me megˆlo enjousiasmì na antapod¸sei ti protˆsei
fila apì ˆllou , allˆ h Marh mpore na enai pio distaktik . Parìla au-
tˆ, gia ton skopì th kataskeu  enì aploÔsterou montèlou, mporoÔme na
upojèsoume ìti upˆrqei h dia tˆsh amoibaiìthta kai apì thn Marh kai a-
pì ton PaÔlo. Tìte, to sunepagìmeno sfˆlma aporrofˆtai apì to montèlo
san statistikì jìrubo . Aut  h prosèggish upojètei ìti kˆpoie sugke-
krimène kanonikìthte enai die gia ìlo to dktuo, gia parˆdeigma, ìti u-
pˆrqei h dia amoibaiìthta se ìlo to dktuo, anexˆrthta apì to poioi kìmboi
(dr¸nte ) emplèkontai. Autì to onomˆzoume omoiogèneia twn isomorfik¸n di-
ktuak¸n sqhmatism¸n, ìpou oi parˆmetroi exis¸nontai, eˆn oi sqhmatismo

enai dioi, ìtan agnooÔme ta qarakthristikˆ twn kìmbwn (opìte oi sqhma-


tismo lègontai isomorfiko). MporoÔme epsh na kˆnoume mia perissìtero
sugkatabatik  upìjesh: gia parˆdeigma, eˆn mporoÔsame na metr soume ta o-
poiad pote qarakthristikˆ twn atìmwn, ta opoa prodiajètoun gia amoibaou
(antapodidìmenou ) desmoÔ , ja mporoÔsame na epitrèyoume thn amoibaiìthta
na exartˆtai apì autˆ ta qarakthristikˆ twn kìmbwn (dr¸ntwn).

'Otan kˆnoume aut n thn upìjesh th omoiogèneia , parˆgoume èna montèlo me


thn dia morf  ìpw th exswsh (1), allˆ t¸ra oi (isomorfiko) sqhmatismo
aforoÔn genikè epidrˆsei (p.q., h sunolik  epdrash th amoibaiìthta ). Tì-
te, oi metr sei twn antstoiqwn diktuak¸n sqhmatism¸n (p.q., o arijmì twn
amoibawn antapodidìmenwn desm¸n) enai oi zhtoÔmene statistikè .

Allˆ upˆrqoun arketo ˆlloi trìpoi, me tou opoou oi periorismo sti pa-
ramètrou mporoÔn na eisaqjoÔn kai, ètsi, diaforetiko periorismo isqÔoun
se diaforetikˆ montèla. SÔmfwna me mia ˆllh mèjodo efarmog  periorism¸n,
exis¸soume ti paramètrou gia isomorfikoÔ sqhmatismoÔ ìtan emplèkon-
tai ìmoioi tÔpoi dr¸ntwn. Gia parˆdeigma, sthn perptwsh th amoibaiìthta
sta sqolikˆ dktua fila , ja mporoÔsame na protenoume ˆllh parˆmetro a-
moibaiìthta gia sqhmatismoÔ duˆdwn th morf  kortsi-kortsi, ˆllh gia
sqhmatismoÔ agìri-kortsi kai ˆllh gia sqhmatismoÔ agìri-agìri.

Akìmh kai an squan kˆpoioi logiko periorismo th omoiogèneia , to montèlo


pijanìn ja eqe pˆra pollè paramètrou , pou ja èprepe na ektimhjoÔn. Se
aut n thn perptwsh, mporoÔme na jewr soume ton periorismì tou arijmoÔ
twn sqhmatism¸n, jètonta kˆpoie paramètrou se me 0   eisagˆgonta
upojetikoÔ periorismoÔ gia ti timè twn paramètrwn, pou antistoiqoÔn se
megalÔterou sqhmatismoÔ .
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 12

1.3 Upojèsei Exart sewn

1.3.1 Graf mata Bernoulli

H aploÔsterh upìjesh exˆrthsh enai gia tuqae katanomè grafhmˆtwn


Bernoulli, oi opoe dhmiourgoÔntai, ìtan upojèsoume ìti oi akmè enai anexˆr-
thte metaxÔ tou , gia parˆdeigma, eˆn emfanzontai tuqaa me mia stajer 
pijanìthta α (Erdös & Rényi, 1959 [5], Frank & Nowicki, 1993 [7]). H apl 
upìjesh exˆrthsh se aut n thn perptwsh enai ìti ìloi oi pijano diakrito
desmo enai anexˆrthtoi o èna apì ton ˆllo. Parathr same parapˆnw ìti oi
monadiko sqhmatismo sqetiko me to montèlo enai auto, stou opoou ìloi
oi pijano desmo sto sqhmatismì enai upì sunj kh exart¸menoi o èna me
ton ˆllo. 'Otan ìloi oi pijano desmo enai anexˆrthtoi, oi monadiko pijano
sqhmatismo aforoÔn ti xeqwristè akmè {Yij }. 'Ara, apì thn exswsh (1)
to genikì montèlo t¸ra enai:
! ( )
1 X
Pr(Y = y) = exp ηij yij
κ
i,j

ParathroÔme ìti, sugkrnonta me thn exswsh (1), kˆje sÔnolo A, pou peri-
lambˆnei mia mìno pijan  akm  Yij , enai èna sqhmatismì autoÔ tou montèlou
kai upˆrqei h parˆmetro ηij gia kˆje ènan tètoio sqhmatismì. H diktuak 
statistik  gA (y) = gij (y) = yij ma lèei eˆn autì o sqhmatismì parath-
retai   ìqi. Eˆn epibˆlloume thn upìjesh th omoiogèneia , ètsi ¸ste kˆje
desmì na sumperifèretai me ton dio trìpo, exis¸noume ti paramètrou ¸ste
ηij = θ , gia ìla ta i kai j , kai, ˆra:
!
1
Pr(Y = y) = exp(θL(y)) (2)
κ
ìpou L(y) = i,j yi,j enai o arijmì twn tìxwn sto grˆfhma y kai h parˆme-
P

tro θ aforˆ thn pijanìthta emfˆnish enì desmoÔ.4 H parˆmetro θ kaletai


parˆmetro akm    puknìthta .

Upˆrqoun kai ˆlle dunatìthte , gia na epibˆlloume thn omoiogèneia. A


upojèsoume ìti èqoume dr¸nte se duo dedomèna mplok. Tìte, mporoÔme na
epibˆlloume thn omoiogèneia katˆ mplok, ètsi ¸ste ηij = θ11 , eˆn kai to i kai
to j enai sto mplok 1, ηij = θ12 , eˆn to i enai sto mplok 1 kai to j enai sto
mplok 2, k.o.k. Tìte enai aplì na dexoume ìti:
!
1  
Pr(Y = y) = exp θ11 L11 (y) + θ12 L12 (y) + θ21 L21 (y) + θ22 L22 (y)
κ
4 Pio sugkekrimèna, α = exp θ/(1+exp θ). H upìjesh omoiogèneia shmanei ìti upˆrqei
mia stajer  pijanìthta gia ìle ti pijanè akmè tou graf mato , dhlad , ìti upˆrqei
mia monadik  pijanìthta α.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 13

ìpou L11 (y) enai o arijmì twn tìxwn mèsa sto pr¸to mplok kai L12 (y) o
arijmì twn tìxwn apì to mplok 1 sto mplok 2 k.o.k.

1.3.2 Duadikˆ Montèla

Mia elafr¸ pio perplokh (allˆ ìqi suqnˆ polÔ realistik ) upìjesh gia
kateujunìmena graf mata enai ìti oi duˆde , ant twn akm¸n, enai anexˆrth-
te h ma apì thn ˆllh. Me aut n thn upìjesh exˆrthsh , èqoume duo tÔpou
sqhmatism¸n sto montèlo, aplè akmè kai amoibae (antapodidìmene ) akmè .
AfoÔ epibˆlloume thn omoiogèneia, to montèlo gnetai:

! !
1 X X
Pr(Y = y) = exp ϑ yij + ρ yij yji
κ
i,j i,j
!
1
= exp(θL(y) + ρM (y)) (3)
κ

ìpou L(y) enai o arijmì twn desm¸n sto y kai M (y) = i,j yij yji enai o
P

arijmì twn amoibawn (antapodidìmenwn) desm¸n sto y. Mia elafr¸ pio


polÔplokh upìjesh omoiogèneia odhge sto montèlo p1 twn Holland & Lei-
nhardt (1981) [13].

MetaxÔ kˆpoiwn ˆllwn sqetik¸n, allˆ pio polÔplokwn kai realistik¸n montè-
lwn, enai to montèlo p2 (Lazega & van Duijn, 1997 [17], van Duijn et al.,
2004 [41]), ìpou upotjetai ìti èqoume duadik  anexarthsa allˆ kai exˆrthsh
apì ta qarakthristikˆ twn kìmbwn (dr¸ntwn). To montèlo p2 enai katˆllhlo,
se peript¸sei pou perimènoume th dom  na diamorfwje apì ta qarakthristi-
kˆ. Enai mia proèktash tou montèlou p1 me ti epidrˆsei tou apostolèa kai
tou paral pth na antimetwpzontai san tuqae epidrˆsei , sumperilambano-
mènwn kai twn epidrˆsewn twn dr¸ntwn kai twn duˆdwn dr¸ntwn. 'Oso pio
polÔploke upojèsei sthrzoun autì to montèlo, tìso pio realistikì autì
gnetai gia pragmatikˆ diktuakˆ dedomèna, eidikˆ ìtan oi epidrˆsei twn qa-
rakthristik¸n anamènontai na enai isqurè . Diafèrei apì ta sÔnhjh montèla
ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn w pro thn enswmˆtwsh twn tuqawn epi-
drˆsewn. Bebaw , sthn perptwsh twn mh kateujunìmenwn grafhmˆtwn, ta
montèla Bernoulli kai ta montèla duadik  exˆrthsh enai tautìshma: gia mh
kateujunìmena graf mata, h parˆmetro amoibaiìthta p sthn exswsh (3)
den pazei kanèna rìlo kai to montèlo anˆgetai sthn exswsh (2).

1.3.3 Tuqaa Graf mata Markov

Oi domè Bernoulli kai oi domè duadik  exˆrthsh apoteloÔn mh realisti-


kè upojèsei se pollè peript¸sei , tìso empeirikˆ, ìso kai jewrhtikˆ. Oi
Frank & Strauss (1986) [8℄ eis gagan gia pr¸th forˆ thn exˆrthsh Markov,
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 14

sÔmfwna me thn opoa èna pijanì desmì apì to i sto j jewretai ìti exar-
tˆtai apì opoiond pote ˆllo pijanì desmì, pou perilambˆnei   to i   to j ,
dojèntwn ìlwn twn ˆllwn desm¸n. Se aut n thn perptwsh, lème ìti oi dÔo
desmo enai upì sunj kh exart¸menoi, dojèntwn twn tim¸n ìlwn twn ˆllwn
desm¸n.5 H exˆrthsh Markov mpore na qarakthriste w h upìjesh ìti duo
pijano desmo diktÔou enai upì sunj kh exart¸menoi, ìtan sundèoun ènan
koinì dr¸nta. Gia parˆdeigma, h sqèsh metaxÔ tou Pètrou kai th Marh
mpore na exartˆtai epsh apì thn parousa   thn apousa th sqèsh metaxÔ
th Marh kai tou Giˆnnh (idw eˆn h sqèsh aut  enai aisjhmatik !). Mpo-
roÔme na to ekfrˆsoume pio tupikˆ, upojètonta thn upì sunj kh exˆrthsh
metaxÔ ìlwn twn pijan¸n desm¸n Yπµ kai Yµγ . Auto oi dÔo pijano desmo
enai upì sunj kh exart¸menoi, epeid  moirˆzontai ton kìmbo µ (Marh).

Eˆn epsh upojèsoume thn omoiogèneia, prokÔptei to montèlo tuqaou graf -


mato Markov, me sqhmatismoÔ (kai antstoiqe paramètrou ) gia ta kateuju-
nìmena kai mh kateujunìmena graf mata, pou parousiˆzontai sto sq ma 1.1.
Autè oi parˆmetroi antistoiqoÔn se kˆpoie polÔ gnwstè domikè kanoniko-
t te sth bibliografa twn grafhmˆtwn kai diktÔwn. Gia kateujunìmena gra-
f mata, èqoume  dh dei thn parˆmetro th akm  (τ15 ) kai thn parˆmetro
th amoibaiìthta (τ11 ) sta montèla Bernoulli kai duadik  anexarthsa . U-
pˆrqoun diˆforoi parˆmetroi gia ta 2-astèria: h parˆmetro twn 2-pro -ta-
èxw-asteri¸n (τ12 ) mpore na jewrhje ìti antistoiqe sthn diastaltikìthta, h
parˆmetro twn 2-mikt¸n-asteri¸n (τ13 ) antistoiqe sti 2-diadromè kai h pa-
rˆmetro twn 2-pro -ta-mèsa-asteri¸n (τ14 ) ìti antistoiqe sth dhmotikìthta.
ParathroÔme kai tou shmantikoÔ metabatikoÔ kai kuklikoÔ sqhmatismoÔ
((τ9 ) kai (τ10 )). Lambˆnonta upìyh autè ti paramètrou , enisqÔetai h apo-
telesmatikìthta twn montèlwn, kaj¸ upˆrqei èlleiyh diktuak¸n montèlwn,
pou enswmat¸noun autè ti epidrˆsei (Newman, 2003 [21]), kai polÔ l-
ga apì autˆ mporoÔn na ektimhjoÔn apì pragmatikˆ dedomèna. To pl re
sÔnolo twn paramètrwn perilambˆnei epsh ìla ta pijanˆ astèria an¸terh
tˆxh , parìlo pou, eˆn ìla autˆ ta astèria sumperilhfjoÔn upˆrqoun pollè
parˆmetroi gia to montèlo, pou prèpei na ektimhjoÔn. Molonìti merikè arqi-
kè efarmogè twn montèlwn tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Markov sumperielˆmbanan
mìno epidrˆsei 2-asteri¸n, enai t¸ra gnwstì ìti mpore na enai shmantikì
na sumperilambˆnontai mh mhdenikè parˆmetroi gia toulˆqiston thn epdrash
twn 3-asteri¸n sta montèla poll¸n koinwnik¸n diktÔwn (Robins et al., 2004
[27], 2005 [28]). Mia enallaktik  prosèggish (ìpw ja doÔme pio kˆtw) peri-
lambˆnei ìle ti paramètrou twn asteri¸n an¸terh tˆxh , allˆ epibˆllei
periorismoÔ sti sqèsei metaxÔ twn paramètrwn gia ta astèria an¸terh
tˆxh kai kat¸terh tˆxh .
5
Eˆn duo desmo enai upì sunj kh exart¸menoi, tìte eˆn h tim  tou enì allˆxei, h
pijanìthta tou ˆllou desmoÔ metabˆlletai, akìmh kai eˆn ìloi oi ˆlloi desmo tou diktÔou
paramenoun oi dioi.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 15

Sq ma 1.1: Sqhmatismo kai parˆmetroi gia ta montèla tuqawn grafhmˆtwn


Markov.

Gia parˆdeigma, èna montèlo tuqaou graf mato Markov gia èna mh kateuju-
nìmeno dktuo me epidrˆsei akm¸n, 2-asteri¸n kai 3-asteri¸n enai to:

!
1  
Pr(Y = y) = exp θL(y) + σ2 S2 (y) + σ3 S3 (y) + τ T (y) (4)
κ

ìpou S2 (y) kai S3 (y) enai oi arijmo twn 2-asteri¸n kai twn 3-asteri¸n,
antstoiqa, mèsa sto dktuo y kai T (y) enai o arijmì twn trig¸nwn sto
y. ParathroÔme ìti, gia tuqaa graf mata Markov, enai epsh pijanì na
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 16

sumperilˆboume paramètrou gia astèria an¸terh tˆxh apì 3 (4-astèria,


5-astèria k.lp.). To montèlo th exswsh (4) enai èna parˆdeigma, sto o-
poo kˆpoie parˆmetroi an¸terh tˆxh tjentai se me 0. Se aut n thn
perptwsh, upojètoume ìti h katanom  twn asteri¸n (sthn pragmatikìthta,
h katanom  twn bajm¸n) mpore epark¸ na exhghje apì ti epidrˆsei twn
2− kai 3-asteri¸n.6

Prèpei na parathrhje ìti oi statistikè sto montèlo Markov sqetzontai me-


taxÔ tou , me thn ènnoia ìti kˆpoie enai an¸terh tˆxh apì kˆpoie ˆlle .
Gia parˆdeigma, a upojèsoume ìti upˆrqei èna 3-astèri se èna mh kateujunì-
meno grˆfhma me kèntro ton kìmbo i. Tìte, epsh parathroÔme ìti upˆrqoun
tra 2-astèria (kai trei akmè ) epsh me kèntro ton kìmbo i. Autì enai
anˆlogo me an¸terh tˆxh allhlepidrˆsei sti gnwstè genikè diadikase
grammik¸n montèlwn, kˆti pou apotele èna shmantikì stoiqeo, pou bohjˆ
sthn ermhnea tou montèlou. Eˆn, gia parˆdeigma, to grˆfhma èqei pollˆ
2-astèria, tìte merikˆ ja sqhmatzoun trgwna exaita th tÔqh . Allˆ eˆn
upˆrqei mia ousiastik  trigwnik  epdrash se èna montèlo tuqaou graf ma-
to Markov, aut  enai, pˆnw kai pèra apì ìla, h epdrash twn 2-asteri¸n
kai mporoÔme na sumperˆnoume ìti to eppedo th trigwnopohsh de sunèbei
aplˆ kai mìno lìgw th tuqaa epikˆluyh poll¸n 2-asteri¸n ( , sthn prag-
matikìthta, poll¸n akm¸n). Se aut n thn perptwsh, ja sumperaname ìti h
trigwnopohsh  tan mia shmantik  diadikasa se autì to dktuo, anexˆrthta
apì ˆlle epidrˆsei .

'Eqoun epsh anaptuqje diaforetikè epexergase autoÔ tou basikoÔ montè-


lou tuqaou graf mato Markov: gia polumetablhtˆ dktua (Pattison & W-
asserman, 1999 [25]), gia dktua me timè (Robins et al., 1999 [34]) kai gia
dktua upagwg  (Skvoretz & Faust, 1999 [36], Pattison & Robins, 2004
[24]).

1.3.4 Domè Exart sewn me Metablhtè pˆnw stou


Kìmbou

Upˆrqoun pollo trìpoi gia na eisaqjoÔn oi epidrˆsei twn qarakthristik¸n


twn kìmbwn (dr¸ntwn) sta montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Markov
kai ˆlla. Upojètoume ìti upˆrqei èna diˆnusma metablht¸n X enì duadi-
koÔ qarakthristikoÔ, ìpou Xi = 1, eˆn o drwn i èqei to qarakthristikì,
kai Xi = 0, alli¸ . To diˆnusma x enai tìte to sÔnolo twn parathr sewn
sto X. Parìti enai dunatìn na gnei h genkeush gia qarakthristikˆ, pou
ete parnoun pollè   suneqe timè , ed¸ ja perioristoÔme se duadikˆ qara-
kthristikˆ. Sto shmeo autì, san parˆdeigma, ja perigrˆyoume se suntoma
6
Gia na emaste sgouroi gia autì, mporoÔme na prosomoi¸soume mia katanom  gra-
fhmˆtwn tou prosarmosmènou montèlou kai na elègxoume ti katanomè twn bajm¸n se
sÔgkrish me to parathroÔmeno dktuo.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 17

montèla koinwnik  epilog  , sta opoa ta qarakthristikˆ upotjetai ìti pro-


blèpoun exwgen¸ tou desmoÔ tou diktÔou (Robins et al., 2001a [32]).7
MporoÔme na diereun soume thn perptwsh, pou mia upìjesh omoiìthta   o-
moiofila apotele th bˆsh th koinwnik  epilog  dhlad , thn perptwsh
pou oi koinwniko desmo tenoun na anaptuqjoÔn metaxÔ dr¸ntwn me ta dia
qarakthristikˆ exetˆzonta thn katanom  twn desm¸n dojesh th kata-
nom  twn qarakthristik¸n. Me ˆlla lìgia, antjeta me thn exswsh (1), to
endiafèron ma enai sthn pijanìthta tou graf mato y, dojèntwn twn para-
thr sewn twn qarakthristik¸n x, dhlad , ma endiafèrei t¸ra h pijanìthta
Pr(Y = y| X = x).

Sq ma 1.2: (A-H) Sqhmatismo gia èna montèlo qarakthristik¸n Markov


montèlo koinwnik  epilog  graf mato Markov.

Mia apl  upìjesh exˆrthsh anˆmesa sta qarakthristikˆ kai sti diktuakè
metablhtè enai ìtan to qarakthristikì tou i ephreˆzei pijanoÔ desmoÔ ,
pou sundèoun to i (dhlad , Yij ), kai anaferìmaste se aut n thn upìjesh
w upìjesh twn qarakthristik¸n Markov. Gia parˆdeigma, se èna organw-
tikì plasio, h arqaiìthta enì dr¸nto (p.q., arqaiìthta sti dieujuntikè
ikanìthte ) mpore na ephreˆsei tou pijanoÔ desmoÔ autoÔ tou dr¸nto .
An jewr soume qarakthristikˆ Markov maz me diktuakè exart sei Marko-
v, gia èna mh kateujunìmeno grˆfhma, to montèlo perilambˆnei tou sqhma-
tismoÔ (mèqri 3-astèria), pou fanontai sto sq ma 1.2, ìpou oi gkri kìmboi
7
Mia ˆllh mèjodo enswmˆtwsh twn qarakthristik¸n twn dr¸ntwn enai mèsw mo-
ntèlwn koinwnik  epdrash , sta opoa oi desmo tou diktÔou problèpoun exwgen¸ ta
qarakthristikˆ (Robins et al., 2001b [33]).
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 18

anaparistoÔn dr¸nte me arqaiìthta kai oi ˆsproi kìmboi anaparistoÔn o-


poiond pote dr¸nta, anexˆrthta eˆn enai neìtero   presbÔtero . Me ˆlla
lìgia, o sqhmatismì (A) anaparistˆ ti tˆsei twn presbÔterwn dieujunt¸n
na sundèontai metaxÔ tou , en¸ o sqhmatismì (B) anaparistˆ thn tˆsh enì
presbÔterou dieujÔnth na èqei polloÔ desmoÔ k.o.k. An broÔme mia megˆ-
lh jetik  ektmhsh twn paramètrwn tou sqhmatismoÔ (A), autì apotele mia
apìdeixh ìti upˆrqoun omoiofilikè epidrˆsei sto dktuo.

ParathroÔme apì to sq ma 1.2 ìti oi mìnoi mh duadiko sqhmatismo me qarakth-


ristikˆ emplèkoun 2   3- astèria, ìpou o dr¸n me to qarakthristikì brsketai
sto kèntro tou asterioÔ. Gia na parˆgoume trigwnikoÔ sqhmatismoÔ me
metablhtè qarakthristik¸n apaitoÔntai epiprìsjete upojèsei exˆrthsh .

1.3.5 Pio PolÔploke Upojèsei Exˆrthsh

Teleutaa èqoun anaptuqje diˆfore epexergase montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqa-


wn grafhmˆtwn, pou kinoÔntai pèra apì ta tuqaa graf mata Markov. Oi Pat-
tison & Robins (2002) [23℄ parousasan duo kainotome . Mèsw twn diarjrw-
tik¸n dom¸n, periìrisan ti exart sei austhr¸ mèsa sta meletoÔmena koi-

nwnikˆ plasia. Basismènoi sthn douleiˆ tou Feld (1981) [6℄, prìteinan gia pa-
radegmata koinwnikè domè mèsa se èna qwroqronikì plasio, ìpw mia omˆda
anjr¸pwn sugkentrwmènwn thn dia stigm  sto dio mèro . Epsh je¸rhsan
koinwnikè domè mèsa se èna perissìtero afhrhmèno koinwnikopolitistikì
q¸ro, ìpw zeÔgh atìmwn sundedemènwn mèsw twn politik¸n desmeÔse¸n
tou , kaj¸ kai domè , pou antanakloÔn kˆpoiou exwterikoÔ periorismoÔ ,
ìpw oi organwtikè domè .

'Ena epiprìsjeto knhtro gia thn eisagwg  twn koinwnik¸n plaiswn enai to
gegonì ìti h exˆrthsh Markov fanetai mh realistik  gia megˆla dktua, sta
opoa oi dr¸nte mpore akìmh kai na mh gnwrzoun kai gia thn Ôparxh kˆ-
poiwn ˆllwn dr¸ntwn kai na mh diajètoun trìpou na èrjoun se epafè maz
tou , allˆ ìmw oi endeqìmenoi desmo tou jewroÔntai akìma ìti mporoÔn
na ephreˆsoun kai ˆllou pijanoÔ desmoÔ . An h upìjesh gia th dom  enì
koinwnikoÔ plaisou enai kalˆ jemeliwmènh, upˆrqoun epipt¸sei ston tÔpo
twn dedomènwn, pou prèpei na sugkentrwjoÔn, gia mia pl rh katanìhsh tou
koinwnikoÔ diktÔou. Gia peraitèrw epexergase se aut n thn kateÔjunsh
dete Schweinberger & Snijders (2003) [35].

Mia deÔterh kateÔjunsh, pou parousiˆsthke apì tou Pattison & Robins
(2002) [23℄,  tan h idèa twn mh Markobian¸n exart sewn metaxÔ desm¸n, pou
de moirˆzontai ton dio dr¸nta, allˆ pou mporoÔn na enai allhloexart¸menoi
dia mèsou sundèsewn me trta mèlh. Gia parˆdeigma, to Yij mpore na enai upì
sunj kh exart¸meno apì to Yrs gia tèsseri diakritoÔ dr¸nte , eˆn upˆrqei
èna parathroÔmeno desmì metaxÔ ete twn i   j kai ete twn r   s. Autˆ
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 19

ta montèla, pou exart¸ntai apì thn ulopohsh, mporoÔn na analujoÔn mèsw


twn dom¸n merik  exˆrthsh twn Pattison & Robins (2002) [23℄. Epsh ,
autˆ ta montèla epitrèpoun thn eisagwg  trig¸nwn, pou emplèkoun epidrˆsei
qarakthristik¸n.

1.4 Ektmhsh

Oi Anderson et al. (1999) [1℄ sth melèth tou twn montèlwn p∗ qrhsimo-
pohsan thn ektmhsh th yeudo-pijanofˆneia , pou eqe eisaqje apì tou
Strauss & Ikeda (1990) [40℄, gia na ektim soun ti paramètrou twn montèlwn
Markov. T¸ra gnwrzoume ìti, analìgw twn dedomènwn, mpore na upˆr-
qoun sobarˆ probl mata me ti ektim sei yeudo-pijanofˆneia gia autˆ ta
montèla. Allˆ gia ta montèla tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Markov, h tupik  mègi-
sth ektmhsh pijanofˆneia den enai eÔkola ulopoi simh gia ìla ta dktua,
parˆ mìno gia ta polÔ mikrˆ, lìgw twn duskoli¸n upologismoÔ th stajerˆ
kanonikopohsh sthn exswsh (1). Autì shmanei ìti oi tupikè statistikè
teqnikè de mporoÔn na efarmostoÔn se autˆ ta montèla. Autˆ ta probl ma-
ta èqoun xeperaste prìsfata me thn anˆptuxh twn nèwn teqnik¸n megsth
pijanofˆneia Monte Carlo.

1.4.1 Ektmhsh Yeudo-Pijanofˆneia

H qr sh th megsth yeudo-pijanofˆneia gia thn ektmhsh diadrastik¸n mo-


ntèlwn eqe arqikˆ eisaqje apì ton Besag (1975) [3℄ kai, sth sunèqeia eqe
protaje apì tou Strauss & Ikeda (1990) [40℄ gia montèla tuqawn grafhmˆ-
twn Markov. Mèsa sth statistik  koinìthta, h yeudo-pijanofˆneia od ghse
sti teqnikè Monte Carlo, ìpou autì  tan efiktì, molonìti èqei akìma tou
dikoÔ th uposthriktè (Wasserman & Robins, 2005 [44]). To pleonèkthma
th ektmhsh th yeudo-pijanofˆneia sto plasio twn montèlwn ekjetik¸n
tuqawn grafhmˆtwn enai ìti h prosarmog  akìmh kai polÔplokwn montèlwn
kajstatai eÔkolh na ulopoihje. To meionèkthma enai ìti oi idiìthte tou
ektimht  den enai pl rw katanohtè kai enai gnwstì ìti gia pollˆ sÔnola
dedomènwn oi ektim sei th yeudo-pijanofˆneia den enai akribe .

H ektmhsh th yeudo-pijanofˆneia katanoetai kalÔtera metasqhmatzonta


thn exswsh (1) sthn akìloujh morf  desmeumènwn pijanot twn (Strauss &
Ikeda, 1990 [40]):
" #
C)
Pr(Yij = 1|yij X
log C
= ηA dA (y) (5)
Pr(Yij = 0|yij )
A(Yij )

ìpou (i) to ˆjroisma enai gia ìlou tou sqhmatismoÔ A, pou perièqoun ta
Yij , (ii) ηA enai h parˆmetro , pou antistoiqe sto sqhmatismì A, (iii) dA (y)
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 20

enai h statistik  twn metabol¸n, dhlad , twn metabol¸n sthn tim  th di-
ktuak  statistik  zA (y), ìtan to yij allˆzei apì 1 se 0, kai (iv) yij
C enai

ìle oi parathr sei twn desm¸n sto y ektì th parat rhsh yij .

O upologismì th statistik  twn metabol¸n èqei suzhthje ekten¸ apì


mia plhj¸ra suggrafèwn (Anderson et al., 1999 [1], Pattison & Robins, 2002
[23], Wasserman & Pattison, 1996 [43], Wasserman & Robins, 2005 [44]) kai,
gia autì, de qreiˆzetai na proqwr soume parapèra se autì to shmeo. AfoÔ
pr¸ta upologistoÔn oi statistikè twn metabol¸n, gia na parˆgoun ti ektim -
sei th yeudo-pijanofˆneia , kˆje pijanì desmì Yij gnetai mia perptwsh
se mia tupik  diadikasa logistik  palindrìmhsh , ìpou to yij problèpetai
apì to sÔnolo twn statistik¸n twn metabol¸n (Anderson et al., 1999 [1]).

Aut  h diadikasa moiˆzei me mia logistik  palindrìmhsh  , sthn pragmatikìth-


ta, èna logarijmikogrammikì (loglinear) montèlo allˆ den enai. H logisti-
k  palindrìmhsh upojètei anexˆrthte parathr sei , mia upìjesh pou saf¸
den thretai gia montèla Markov kai an¸terh tˆxh . 'Etsi, oi ektim sei twn
paramètrwn mpore na enai merolhptikè kai ta tupikˆ lˆjh, sthn kalÔterh
perptwsh, mpore na enai proseggistikˆ kai arketˆ mikrˆ. Den prèpei na
sthriqtoÔme sthn statistik  Wald, gia na apofassoume eˆn mia parˆmetro
enai shmantik    ìqi. Epsh , de mporoÔme na upojèsoume ìti h apìklish
th yeudo-pijanofˆneia enai asumptwtikˆ katanemhmènh me thn χ-tetrˆgwno
(pou ja sunèbaine sthn kanonik  logistik  palindrìmhsh). 'Otan oi exart sei
anˆmesa sti parathr sei den enai isqurè , genik¸ sumbanei oi ektim sei
th yeudopijanofˆneia na enai perissìtero akribe . H ektmhsh th yeudo-
pijanofˆneia qrhsimopoi jhke w s mera lìgw th praktik  eukola th
(dedomènou ìti oi enallaktikè mèjodoi den enai akìma pl rw diajèsime ).
'Otan enai dunatì, h protimoÔmenh epilog  enai h qr sh diadikasi¸n ektmh-
sh Monte Carlo.

1.4.2 Ektmhsh Monte Carlo Mègisth Pijanofˆneia gia thn


Alusda Markov (MCMCMLE)

Prìsfate shmantikè exelxei sti teqnikè ektmhsh Monte Carlo gia ta


montèla ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn èqoun parousiaste apì mia plhj¸ra
suggrafèwn (Snijders, 2002 [37], Handcock et al., 2006 [12], Snijders et al.,
2006 [11] kai Wasserman & Robins, 2005 [44]).

Arqikˆ, parathroÔme ìti h prosomowsh aut¸n twn montèlwn mpore na ulopoi-


hje me èna sqetikˆ ˆmeso trìpo. Qwr na eisèljoume se leptomèreie , h
prosomowsh th katanom  twn grafhmˆtwn gia èna dojèn sÔnolo tim¸n twn
paramètrwn mpore na gnei mèsw diˆforwn algorjmwn (p.q., algorjmwn polÔ
gnwst¸n sthn statistik , ìpw o algìrijmo Metropolis). H prosomowsh
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 21

brsketai sto epkentro th ektmhsh Monte Carlo th mègisth pijanofˆnei-


a (Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation   MCMLE). Diadikase
prosomowsh montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn èqoun perigrafe a-
pì tou Strauss (1986) [39], Snijders (2002) [37] kai Robins et al. (2005) [29].

Molonìti upˆrqoun diaforè anˆmesa sti diaforetikè teqnikè ektmhsh


Monte Carlo (Snijders, 2002 [37], Hunter & Handcock [14]), autè baszon-
tai sthn dia kentrik  mejodologa: prosomowsh mia katanom  tuqawn
grafhmˆtwn apì èna arqikì sÔnolo tim¸n twn paramètrwn kai metˆ beltwsh
twn tim¸n twn paramètrwn me sÔgkrish th katanom  twn grafhmˆtwn ènanti
tou parathroÔmenou graf mato , ìpou h diadikasa epanalambˆnetai mèqri na
stajeropoihjoÔn oi ektim sei twn paramètrwn.

Apì melète tìso th ektmhsh ìso kai th prosomowsh dhmiourg jhkan


anˆgke gia nèe prodiagrafè twn montèlwn tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Markov.
O Handcock (2003) [11] ìrise ìti èqoume thn perptwsh tou sqedìn ekfu-
lismoÔ, ìtan to montèlo perièqei mìno lga grafhmˆta me sqetikˆ megˆlh

pijanìthta (sun jw autˆ enai ete to pl re ete to kenì grˆfhma). Eˆn to
montèlo perièqei mìno autè ti mh endiafèrouse peript¸sei , tìte de ja enai
qr simo gia montelopohsh pragmatik¸n diktÔwn. Oi melète prosomoi¸sewn
protenoun ìti ta montèla grafhmˆtwn Markov, pou perièqoun toulˆqiston mh
mhdenikè paramètrou 3-asteri¸n, tenoun na brskontai ligìtero sthn katˆ-
stash tou sqedìn ekfulismoÔ apì ìti ta montèla, sta opoa h an¸tath tˆxh
mh mhdenik  parˆmetro enai gia 2-astèria (Robins et al., 2005 [29]). Allˆ gia
to sunupologismì twn paramètrwn 3-asteri¸n suqnˆ den arke h apomˆkrun-
sh th sumperiforˆ tou sqedìn ekfulismoÔ se montèla grafhmˆtwn Markov,
idw ìtan prospajoÔme na broÔme montèla, pou anaparˆgoun ta uyhlˆ eppe-
da metabatikìthta , ta opoa suqnˆ parathroÔntai se anjr¸pine koinwnikè
domè (Snijders et al., 2006 [38]). To gegonì ìti autˆ ta probl mata mpore
na mhn parousiastoÔn sthn ektmhsh th yeudo-pijanofˆneia aplˆ shmanei
ìti, gia sqedìn ekfulismèna montèla, oi ektim sei th yeudo-pijanofˆneia
mpore na enai paraplanhtikè . To kÔrio prìblhma se autè ti peript¸sei
enai ìti to montèlo den enai kal¸ - kajorismèno.

To gegonì enai ìti diˆfore teqnikè ektmhsh Monte Carlo enai plèon
diajèsime kai ìpote qreiˆzetai, autè protimoÔntai. Autè oi nèe mejodolo-
ge bgˆzoun sthn epifˆneia kˆpoie anepˆrkeie sta montèla tuqawn grafh-
mˆtwn Markov, ìtan, gia parˆdeigma, oi metabatikè epidrˆsei enai isqurè .
Eˆn autì sumbanei gia èna dojèn sÔnolo dedomènwn, mporoÔme na parathr -
soume ìti enai adÔnato na exaqjoÔn sunepe ektim sei twn paramètrwn me
thn ektmhsh Monte Carlo megsth pijanofˆneia (apì teqnik  ˆpoyh , h
diadikasa ektmhsh de sugklnei). Autì shmanei ìti ta montèla grafhmˆtwn
Markov enai akatˆllhla gia ta dedomèna. Gia autìn ton lìgo oi Snijders et
al. (2006) [38℄ eis gagan kˆpoie nèe prodiagrafè gia montèla ekjetik¸n
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 22

tuqawn grafhmˆtwn.

1.5 Nèe Prodiagrafè

Oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄ prìteinan trei nèe statistikè , pou mpo-
roÔn na sumperilhfjoÔn gia ti prodiagrafè montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn
grafhmˆtwn: ta enallassìmena k-astèria, ta enallassìmena k-trgwna kai ti
anexˆrthte enallassìmene 2-diadromè . Ed¸, ja sugkentrwjoÔme sta pr¸-

ta duo. Sugkekrimèna, dnoume èmfash sthn qrhsimìthta th nèa ènnoia twn


enallassìmenwn k-trig¸nwn san mètro an¸terh tˆxh th metabatikìthta .
Tupikˆ, anaferìmaste se autè ti paramètrou kai sta antstoiqa montèla w
an¸terh tˆxh , epeid  sumperilambˆnoun sqhmatismoÔ me perissìterou apì

trei kìmbou . Se aut n thn enìthta, estiˆzoume se an¸terh tˆxh paramè-


trou gia mh-kateujunìmena graf mata, me kˆpoia sqìlia gia kateujunìmena
sto tèlo .

1.5.1 Enallassìmena k -Astèria

Apì teqnik  ˆpoyh , to montèlo me mình parˆmetro aut  twn enallassìme-


nwn k-asteri¸n paramènei sthn klˆsh twn montèlwn tuqawn grafhmˆtwn
Markov. To knhtro gia mia nèa parˆmetro prokÔptei apì thn empeira sthn
prosarmog  montèlwn. Prosarmìzonta montèla me paramètrou asteri¸n se
sÔnola diktuak¸n dedomènwn, gia ta opoa oi ektim sei sÔgklish mporoÔn
na exaqjoÔn, oi Robins et al. (2007b) [31] eqan suqnˆ parathr sei ìti h
ektmhsh mia paramètrou gia astèria uyhl  tˆxh eqe to antjeto prìsh-
mo kai mikrìterh tim  apì ti paramètrou gia astèria mikrìterh tˆxh . Gia
parˆdeigma, ja mporoÔsame se èna montèlo Markov, ìpw to (4), na doÔme
ektim sei paramètrwn, ìpou to σ3 ja  tan katˆ prosèggish so me −σ2 /λ,
gia kˆpoio λ megalÔtero th monˆda .

Sto montèlo Markov (4), oi parˆmetroi twn asteri¸n eskemmèna periorsth-


kan sto mègisto twn 3-asteri¸n. 'Omw , pio genikˆ, h upìjesh exˆrthsh
Markov epitrèpei astèria an¸terh tˆxh , èw astèria th mègisth pijan 
tˆxh (n − 1). Sthn (4), isqÔei h upìjesh ìti oi parˆmetroi gia autˆ ta a-
stèria an¸terh tˆxh enai se me 0 lìgw tou periorismoÔ tou pl jou twn
paramètrwn gia thn epteuxh enì eparkoÔ montèlou, sto opoo mporoÔn na
ektimhjoÔn oi parˆmetroi.8

H upìjesh twn enallassìmenwn k-asteri¸n protenei ìti, ant na jèsoume


ti paramètrou asteri¸n an¸terh tˆxh se me 0, ìle oi parˆmetroi gia
ta astèria kratoÔntai sto montèlo, allˆ me ènan grammikì periorismì gia ti
timè twn paramètrwn, tètoio ¸ste, gia ìla ta k ≥ 2, σ(k+1) = −σk /λ, gia
8
Aut  h upìjesh mpore na eidoje san anˆlogh me thn parˆbleyh twn diadrˆsewn
an¸terh tˆxh , gia parˆdeigma, sthn tupik  palindrìmhsh.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 23

kˆpoia λ megalÔtera th monˆda . Tìte, sthn (1), upˆrqei mia parˆmetro


σ2 , pou sunupologzei tautìqrona ìle ti epidrˆsei twn asteri¸n, mèsw th
parakˆtw statistik  :
n−1
X Sk
u= (−1)k (6)
λk−2
k=2
Sthn upìjesh σ(k+1) = −σk /λ, gia k ≥ 2, h parˆmetro σ2 anafèretai w h
parˆmetro twn enallassìmenwn k-asteri¸n.

H statistik  (6) perilambˆnei astèria ìlwn twn tˆxewn, allˆ, gia λ megalÔte-
ro th monˆda , h epdrash twn asteri¸n an¸terh tˆxh mei¸netai, gia megˆla
k kai gia enallassìmena prìshma. Me aut n thn ènnoia, h upìjesh enai mˆl-
lon genikìterh apì thn apl  epibol  sti paramètrou twn asteri¸n an¸terh
tˆxh th tim  0, pou enai h upìjesh, pou uponoetai sthn (4).9

Mia profan  er¸thsh enai ti tim  ja d¸soume sto λ. 'Eqoume qrhsimopoi-


 sei to λ = 2 se pollè peript¸sei kai autì fanetai na enai èna logikì
shmeo ènarxh gia arketè èreune . Allˆ, bebaw , ja  tan epijumhtì na
upologsoume mia bèltisth tim  gia to λ. O Hunter (2007) [15] deqnei pw
autì mpore na pragmatopoihje (dete epsh Hunter & Handcock, 2006 [14]).
Gia tou skopoÔ th paroÔsa enìthta , jètoume λ = 2.

Autì pou enai shmantikì enai p¸ ermhneÔetai aut  h parˆmetro mèsw twn
sunepei¸n, pou èqei gia th dom  tou graf mato . Fusikˆ, h ektmhsh mia pa-
ramètrou gia mia dojesa topik  dom  enai sun jw endeiktik  th èktash ,
me thn opoa h dom  empeirikˆ parathretai (arke na mhn upˆrqoun zht mata
ekfulismoÔ   ditropikìthta ). Allˆ h suss¸reush aut¸n twn dom¸n ja pa-
rˆgei idiatere sunolikè diktuakè domè , opìte, ìtan èna dktuo emfanzei
tètoie domè , ja mporoÔsame na perimènoume ti ektim sei twn sqetik¸n pa-
ramètrwn na enai megˆle kai axioshmewte .

Eˆn h parˆmetro twn enallassìmenwn k-asteri¸n enai jetik , tìte ta pio


pijanˆ graf mata enai pijanìn na perièqoun kˆpoiou kìmbou an¸terou baj-
moÔ (hub), en¸ mia arnhtik  parˆmetro upodhl¸nei ìti ta graf mata me kìm-
bou uyhloÔ bajmoÔ enai apjana, opìte oi kìmboi den tenoun na enai hub kai
èqoun mikrìterh metablhtikìthta metaxÔ twn bajm¸n. Pio idiatera, oi Snij-
ders et al. (2006) [38] isqursthkan ìti mia jetik  parˆmetro twn enallassì-
9
ParathroÔme ìti, se antjesh me ta tupikˆ graf mata Markov, h statistik  den enai
plèon mia ˆmesh katamètrhsh twn sqhmatism¸n sto parathroÔmeno dktuo, allˆ mˆllon
exartˆtai apì diˆfore katametr sei sqhmatism¸n, sthn perptwsh aut , katametr sei
twn diˆforwn sqhmatism¸n asteri¸n. Me ˆlla lìgia, qrhsimopoietai, ètsi, mia upìje-
sh exˆrthsh Markov, allˆ epibˆlletai mia sugkekrimènh morf  periorismoÔ, gia ìle ti
paramètrou twn asteri¸n, kai ìqi o tupikì periorismì th omoiogèneia , pou prwtoqrh-
simopoi jhke apì tou Frank & Strauss (1986) [8℄.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 24

menwn k-asteri¸n (maz me mia arnhtik  parˆmetro puknìthta ) sunepˆgontai


graf mata, pou emfanzoun protim sei gia sundèsei metaxÔ enì megalÔ-
terou arijmoÔ kìmbwn mikroÔ bajmoÔ kai enì mikrìterou arijmoÔ kìmbwn
megalÔterou bajmoÔ, parìmoia me th dom  pur na perifèreia . Allˆ, ìtan
èna kìmbo ftˆsei na èqei èna sugkekrimèno bajmì, h epteuxh peraitèrw
bajm¸n prosjètei lga sthn {dhmotikìthtˆ} tou.10 'Etsi, gia λ = 2, upˆrqei
mikr  diaforˆ metaxÔ enì kìmbou bajmoÔ 5, 6   an¸terh {dhmotikìthta }.
Se genikè grammè , èna kìmbo brskei thn porea tou ston pur na, ìtan
èqei petÔqei ènan sugkekrimèno bajmì, qwr kama idiaterh pesh gia uyh-
lìterou bajmoÔ . Tautìqrona, ˆlloi kìmboi mikrìterou bajmoÔ paramènoun
èxw apì ton pur na. 'Epomènw , h genik  sunèpeia enai o sqhmatismì {qa-
lar¸n} dom¸n pur na perifèreia me lgou   kajìlou kìmbou tou pur na,
pou èqoun idiatera uyhloÔ bajmoÔ . Aut  h dom  pur na perifèreia ulo-
poietai (metriasmèna) apì diadikase dhmotikìthta . Allˆzonta thn tim 
tou λ, allˆzei to eppedo tou metriˆsmato , me ìso megalÔtero enai to λ,
tìso pijanìteroi na enai oi kìmboi an¸terwn bajm¸n. Argìtera, ja dexoume
p¸ oi domè pur na perifèreia mporoÔn epsh na pragmatopoihjoÔn apì
isqurè epikaluptìmene epidrˆsei metabatikìthta .

'Ena shmantikì shmeo enai ìti oi parˆmetroi bohjoÔn sth montelopohsh th


katanom  twn bajm¸n. Oi parˆmetroi Markov sto montèlo (4) dnoun kˆ-
poia ¸jhsh sti pr¸te trei ropè th katanom  twn bajm¸n (mèsw twn
paramètrwn gia akmè , 2- kai 3-astèria), allˆ autì den arke pˆnta, ìtan,
gia parˆdeigma, oi katanomè twn bajm¸n emfanzoun kˆpoie akrae timè
(gia kìmbou uyhl¸n bajm¸n). H nèa parˆmetro , pou den apokleei ta a-
stèria an¸terh tˆxh , parèqei eleujera kin sewn sto diaqeirismì tètoiwn
asÔmmetrwn katanom¸n twn bajm¸n. Me autì den ennoetai, fusikˆ, ìti ìle
oi dunatìthte plhroÔntai kai, ìtan ta dktua enai polÔ kentrikopoihmèna me
ènan mikrì arijmì kìmbwn polÔ uyhloÔ bajmoÔ (hub), to montèlo mìno me
thn nèa parˆmetro enai apjano na parèqei mia kal  prosarmog  sta dedo-
mèna. Parìla autˆ, h mèqri stigm  empeira protenei ìti h parˆmetro twn
enallassìmenwn k-asteri¸n enai pio qr simh sthn prosarmog  montèlwn apì
ènan mikrìtero arijmì memonomènwn paramètrwn asteri¸n Markov. Merikè
forè , mia kal  prosarmog  th katanom  twn bajm¸n mpore na epiteuqje
me èna sunduasmì paramètrwn enallassìmenwn k-asteri¸n kai tupik¸n para-
mètrwn 2-asteri¸n Markov.

Giat mpore ìmw h upìjesh twn enallassìmenwn k-asteri¸n na bohj sei


ston ekfulismì? Oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄ isqursthkan ìti qreiˆzetai
na upˆrqei mia isorropa metaxÔ arnhtik¸n kai jetik¸n paramètrwn asteri¸n,
10
Ed¸, autì pou orzoume w {dhmotikìthta} enì kìmbou i mpore na jewrhje pio
teqnikˆ to desmeumèno log-odds (logarijmo-pijanìthta) th prosj kh enì kìmbou j, pou
sundèetai me to i.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 25

gia na apofeuqje to endeqìmeno h prokÔptousa katanom  grˆfwn na periè-


qei pollˆ pl rh   pollˆ kenˆ graf mata. H parousa twn enallassìmenwn
pros mwn sto ˆjroisma sthn (6) stoqeÔei se aut n thn isorropa.

1.5.2 Enallassìmena k -Trgwna

H upìjesh twn enallassìmenwn k-trig¸nwn kinetai pèran twn upojèsewn e-


xˆrthsh , pˆnw sti opoe baszontai ta montèla tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Mark-
ov, mèsw th qr sh ant gia autè th ènnoia th merik  exˆrthsh , pou
protˆjhke apì tou Pattison & Robins (2002) [23℄. H upokemenh upìjesh th
exˆrthsh parousiˆsthke apì tou Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄. En suntoma,
duo pijanè akmè se èna grˆfhma, Yrs kai Yuv , gia diakekrimènou kìmbou
r, s, u, v, upotjetai ìti enai upì sunj kh exart¸mene , eˆn Ysu = Yuv = 1.
Me ˆlla lìgia, eˆn oi duo pijanè akmè sto grˆfhma eqan ìntw parath-
rhje, ja eqan dhmiourg sei ènan 4-kÔklo. Ousiastikˆ, den enai dÔskolo
na fantastoÔme katastˆsei , sti opoe tètoie exart sei koinwnik¸n ku-
klwmˆtwn mpore na enai efiktè . Gia parˆdeigma, a upojèsoume ìti se mia

epiqerhsh o Sthb ergˆzetai me thn Ubìnnh kai o Rompèrto me to Bktor.


Tìte, eˆn o Rompèrto kai o Sthb arqzoun na douleÔoun se èna kainoÔrgio
prìtzekt, h pijanìthta na ergasjoÔn maz kai h Ubìnnh kai o Bktor mpore
na auxhje. Me ˆlla lìgia, h pijanìthta na ergasjoÔn maz h Ubìnnh kai o
Bktor auxˆnetai, lìgw tou gegonìto ìti o Rompèrto kai o Sthb ergˆzontai
maz, allˆ mìno efìson o Rompèrto ergˆzetai  dh me to Bktor kai o Sthb me
thn Ubìnnh.

Oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄ epikalèsthkan aut n thn upìjesh exˆrthsh


epiprìsjeta me thn exˆrthsh Markov, ètsi ¸ste sthn parapˆnw perptwsh, ta

Yrs kai Ysv (k.o.k.) upotjetai epsh ìti enai anexˆrthta. Den enai dÔskolo
na parathr soume diaisjhtikˆ ìti, ìtan isqÔoun oi upojèsei th exˆrthsh
koinwnik¸n kuklwmˆtwn kai exˆrthsh Markov, kˆpoioi sqhmatismo, pou e-
nai pio polÔplokoi apì ìti ta aplˆ trgwna, enai shmantiko gia to montèlo.

Oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄ prìteinan ta k-trgwna san kainoÔrgie an¸te-


rh tˆxh metabatikè domè gia mh-kateujunìmena graf mata. 'Ena k-trgwno
enai èna sunduasmì apì k diakritˆ trgwna, pou ìla moirˆzontai mia akm 
(thn koin  bˆsh twn k trig¸nwn). A upojèsoume ìti duo geitoniko kìmboi
r kai s enai epsh kai oi duo geitoniko stou diou k kìmbou t1 , t2 , ..., tk
(dhlad , ìti upˆrqei akm  metaxÔ twn r kai tm kai metaxÔ twn s kai tm , gia
ìla ta m = 1, 2, ..., k). Tìte h akm  metaxÔ twn r kai s (h bˆsh) enai koin 
sta k diaforetikˆ trgwna me kìmbou r, s kai tm . H sunolik  dom , pou
perilambˆnei ìla ta diakritˆ trgwna, onomˆzetai k-trgwno. Oi akmè metaxÔ
twn r kai tm kai metaxÔ twn s kai tm anafèrontai w pleurè tou k-trig¸nou.
Profan¸ , èna 1-trgwno enai èna sunhjismèno trgwno. Sto sq ma 1.3 a-
peikonzoume ta 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 26

Sq ma 1.3: 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna.

'Opw èdeixan oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄, o sunupologismì twn k-trig¸nwn


sto montèlo odhge se mia katanom  pijanot twn, sthn opoa duo metablhtè
akm¸n enai upì sunj kh exart¸mene mìno ìtan ete apoteloÔn èna sqhma-
tismì Markov (upˆrqei koinì kìmbo ) ete sqhmatzoun èna koinwnikì kÔ-
klwma (dhmiourgetai èna 4-kÔklo ). Autì èqei kˆpoia shmasa, afoÔ deqnei
ìti to montèlo paramènei isqurˆ periorismèno apì upojèsei upì sunj kh
anexarthsa .

'Estw Tk to pl jo twn k-trig¸nwn se èna grˆfhma. Tìte ta k-trgwna


mporoÔn na sunduastoÔn sthn dia statistik , akrib¸ me ton dio trìpo,
ìpw ta enallassìmena k-astèria, dhlad :
n−1
X Tk
v= (−1)k (7)
λk−2
k=2

Aut  enai h statistik  twn enallassìmenwn k-trig¸nwn. H antstoiqh parˆme-


tro k -trig¸nou τ = τ1 antistoiqe se ènan sqhmatismì (1-)trig¸nou, me ton

epiprìsjeto periorismì ìti τk+1 = −τk/λ , ìpou τk enai h parˆmetro , pou


antistoiqe se èna k-trgwno. Aut  h statistik  kai h antstoiqh parˆmetro
sumperilambˆnontai tìte sta montèla th morf  (1).

H statistik  twn enallassìmenwn k-trig¸nwn den paristˆ aplˆ mia trigwno-


pohsh sto grˆfhma, allˆ epiprìsjeta apotele èna mètro th èktash , sthn
opoa ta dia ta trgwna sunen¸nontai metaxÔ tou , gia na sqhmatsoun mega-
lÔtere uyhlìterh tˆxh {sustˆde } sto grˆfhma. O sqedìn ekfulismì gia
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 27

montèla Markov sumbanei suqnˆ, ìtan ta graf mata perilambˆnoun megalÔte-


re domè tÔpou klka , oi opoe perièqoun pollˆ trgwna, parˆ mˆllon ìtan
pollˆ trgwna aplˆ diaskorpzontai omoiogen¸ kai xeqwristˆ mèsa sto grˆ-
fhma. Me ˆlla lìgia, ta graf mata, pou perièqoun puknè perioqè sustˆdwn
me pollˆ trgwna, enai dÔskolo na anaparaqjoÔn me thn qrhsimopohsh twn
tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Markov. H anqneush kai h melèth tètoiwn puknìterwn
perioq¸n (dhlad , h tautopohsh twn sunektik¸n uposunìlwn kìmbwn) èqei
mia megˆlh istora kai paramènei èna kÔrio jèma sthn anˆlush twn grafhmˆtwn
kai diktÔwn, genikìtera. H parˆmetro metabatikìthta sta tuqaa graf mata
Markov  tan h pr¸th prospˆjeia gia montelopohsh aut¸n twn puknìterwn
dom¸n, epeid  to trgwno apotele th mikrìterh klka metaxÔ tri¸n kìmbwn.

Akìmh, ìpw èqoun uposthrxei oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄, gia na apofeu-
qje o ekfulismì sth montelopohsh tètoiwn sugkentr¸sewn trig¸nwn, qrei-
ˆzetai na eisaqje mia parˆmetro basismènh sth metabatikìthta, h opoa en-
swmat¸nei uposÔnola apì kìmbou megalÔterou apì tra. Tètoie parˆme-
troi qreiˆzontai gia na fèrnoun thn isorropa metaxÔ th tˆsh gia mˆllon
pollˆ sunektikˆ uposÔnola tri¸n   perissìterwn kìmbwn, allˆ kai tou perio-
rismoÔ tou sunolikoÔ arijmoÔ twn trig¸nwn, pou enai anagkao gia thn a-
pofug  tou pl rou graf mato . Epsh , aut  h parˆmetro apaite mia sta-
tistik , pou den enai grammik  w pro to pl jo twn trig¸nwn mèsa ston
ekjetikì ìro, se antjesh me thn (4). Aut  h grammikìthta ston ekjèth a-
potele mia kÔria phg  tou probl mato tou ekfulismoÔ, ìtan ta graf mata
èqoun pollˆ trgwna. H statistik  twn enallasìmenwn k-trig¸nwn prospa-
je na ikanopoi sei autè ti anˆgke , me to enallassìmeno prìshmo kai ta
meioÔmena bˆrh gia k-trgwna an¸terh tˆxh na uphretoÔn tou diou sko-
poÔ ston periorismì twn problhmˆtwn ekfulismoÔ, ìpw gia enallasìmena
k-astèria.

Genik¸ , h jetik  parˆmetro k-trig¸nwn mpore na ermhneuje w mia a-


pìdeixh twn epidrˆsewn metabatikìthta sto grˆfhma. Idiatera, h jetik 
parˆmetro k-trig¸nwn upodhl¸nei ìti upˆrqei mia dom  pur na perifèreia
(exart¸menh kai apì ˆlle epidrˆsei sto montèlo), allˆ, se aut n thn pe-
rptwsh, lìgw twn epidrˆsewn trigwnopohsh kai ìqi twn epidrˆsewn dhmo-
tikìthta (bajm¸n), ìpw  tan h perptwsh gia ti epidrˆsei twn enallas-
sìmenwn k-asteri¸n. MporoÔme na jewr soume ìti h basismènh sta astèria
dom  pur na perifèreia proèrqetai apì thn katanom  twn bajm¸n, kˆti pou
apotele èna fusikì apotèlesma mia diadikasa , me thn opoa èna uposÔnolo
dr¸ntwn enai pio dhmofilè ; en¸, antjeta, gia thn basismènh sta trgwna
diadikasa pur na perifèreia , h dia h katanom  twn bajm¸n enai apìrroia
mia diadikasa , sthn opoa èna pur na dhmiourgetai apì epikaluptìmene
trigwnopoi sei . Sth sunèqeia, ja doÔme epsh p¸ orismènoi sunduasmo
diadikasi¸n, pou baszontai se astèria, kai diadikasi¸n, pou baszontai se
trgwna, odhgoÔn sthn temaqopohsh tou graf mato .
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 28

1.5.3 Enallassìmene k -2-Diadromè

Oi Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄ prìteinan epsh mia parˆmetro, pou enai è-
na sqhmatismì mikrìterh tˆxh gia èna k-trgwno, thn k-2-diadrom . Oi
sqhmatismo twn k-2-diadrom¸n paristˆnoun ton arijmì twn diakekrimènwn
2-diadrom¸n anˆmesa se èna zeugˆri kìmbwn. MporoÔn na jewrhjoÔn w k-
trgwna qwr na sumperilambˆnoun th bˆsh. To knhtro gia ti k-2-diadromè
enai h eisagwg  mia paramètrou, pou ìtan qrhsimopoietai se sunduasmì me
ta k-trgwna, ja kajistˆ ikanoÔ tou ereunhtè na diakrnoun ti tˆsei sqh-
matismoÔ akm¸n sth bˆsh   sti pleurè enì k-trig¸nou. ParathroÔme ìti
oi pleurè enì k-trig¸nou, ìtan den upˆrqei h bˆsh, paristoÔn ènan tÔpo o-
madopohsh akm¸n, pou apotele mìno thn propìjesh th metabatikìthta ,
en¸ h parousa th akm  th bˆsh antanaklˆ th metabatik  kleistìthta.
'Etsi, autì o sunduasmì twn paramètrwn pistopoie thn pesh gia metaba-
tik  kleistìthta (allˆ mia pesh, pou den auxˆnetai grammikˆ me to k ston
ekjèth). To sq ma 1.4 deqnei domè 2-, 3- kai 4-2-diadrom¸n. AkoloÔjw ,
oi metr sei aut¸n twn dom¸n enswmat¸nontai se mia statistik  anˆlogh me
thn (7).

Sq ma 1.4: 2-, 3- kai 4-anexˆrthte 2-diadromè .

1.5.4 Enallaktikè IsodÔname Parametrikopoi sei

Upˆrqoun isodÔname parametrikopoi sei sti prodiagrafè twn enallaσ -


sìmenwn k-asteri¸n, twn enallassìmenwn k-trig¸nwn kai twn enallassìme-
nwn k-diadrom¸n gia to montèlo, oi opoe èqoun majhmatik  komyìthta kai
dieukolÔnoun na epiteuqje mia kalÔterh ermhnea twn fainomènwn.
1. H parˆmetro tou gewmetrikˆ stajmismènou bajmoÔ montelopoie rhtˆ
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 29

thn katanom  twn bajm¸n, allˆ jètei megalÔtero bˆro sto pl jo
twn kìmbwn me tou qamhlìterou bajmoÔ , me ta bˆrh na mei¸nontai
gewmetrikˆ ìso oi bajmo auxˆnontai.

2. H parˆmetro twn akmiakˆ diamoirasmènwn etarwn (pou lègetai ESP,


apì ta arqikˆ tou ìrou sta agglikˆ: edge-wise shared partner ) montelo-
poie thn katanom  twn diamoirasmènwn etarwn twn sundedemènwn dr¸-
ntwn, allˆ me ta bˆrh na mei¸nontai gewmetrikˆ, ìtan o arijmì twn
diamoirasmènwn etarwn auxˆnetai.

3. H parˆmetro twn duadikˆ diamoirasmènwn etarwn (pou lègetai DSP, a-


pì ta arqikˆ tou ìrou sta agglikˆ: dyad-wise shared partner) montelo-
poie thn katanom  twn diamoirasmènwn etarwn twn dr¸ntwn, oi opooi
mpore   de mpore na enai sundedemènoi, allˆ me ta bˆrh na auxˆnontai
gewmetrikˆ, ìtan o arijmì twn diamoirasmènwn etarwn auxˆnetai.

Autè oi parametrikopoi sei parousiˆzontai leptomer¸ apì ton Hunter


(2007) [15℄, o opoo exhge ti sqèsei metaxÔ twn isodÔnamwn parametri-
kopoi sewn.

1.5.5 Nèe Prodiagrafè gia Kateujunìmena Graf mata

Oi parapˆnw perigrafè efarmìzontai se mh-kateujunìmena graf mata. Oi


Snijders et al. (2006) [38℄ prìteinan epsh thn antstoiqh jewra gia kateuju-
nìmena graf mata. Prìteinan duo ekdoqè th paramètrou enallassìmenwn
k-asteri¸n, me th mia na baszetai sta pro -ta-mèsa-astèria kai thn ˆllh sta
pro -ta-èxw-astèria. Gia autì, h ma onomˆzetai parˆmetro twn enallassìme-
nwn k -pro -ta-mèsa-asteri¸n kai h ˆllh onomˆzetai parˆmetro twn enal-

lassìmenwn k -pro -ta-èxw-asteri¸n, antstoiqa. W pro ìla ta ˆlla, h


jewra enai ìmoia me ekenh twn mh-kateujunìmenwn grafhmˆtwn. Gia ta ka-
teujunìmena k-trgwna, prìteinan mia dom , sthn opoa h bˆsh sundèei kateu-
jean duo kìmbou , oi opooi enai epsh sundedemènoi kai me k-kateujunìmene
2-diadromè . To sq ma 1.5 deqnei ta kateujunìmena 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna. Be-
baw , upˆrqoun kai ˆlle dunatìthte , ìtan duo kìmboi sthn bˆsh sundèontai
epsh apì diaforetikoÔ tÔpou 2-hmi-diadrom¸n.
1 MONTŸ
ELA EKJETIKŸ
WN TUQAŸ
IWN GRAFHMŸ
ATWN MARKOV 30

Sq ma 1.5: Kateujunìmena 2-, 3- kai 4-trgwna.


2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 31

2 To Dktuo Florentine
2.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔou

Sto kefˆlaio autì, ìpw kai sta dÔo epìmena, ja efarmìsoume th jewra twn
montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn Markov, thn opoa èqoume parou-
siˆsei sto pr¸to kefˆlaio. H efarmog  autoÔ tou statistikoÔ montèlou ja
ulopoihje ed¸ mèsw tou pakètou statnet (Goodreau et. al, 2006 [9]).

Sthn pr¸th anˆlush, ja asqolhjoÔme me ta dedomèna tou diktÔou Florenti-


ne. Ta dedomèna autˆ sugkentr¸jhkan apì ton John Padgett (1994) [22] kai
aforoÔn èna dktuo 16 istorik¸n oikogenei¸n apì thn Flwrenta, ìpw exels-
setai apì to 1282 èw to 1500. H kÔria sqèsh pou sundèei ti Flwrentianè
oikogèneie enai oi metaxÔ tou gˆmoi (Flomarriage) kai to antstoiqo (koinw-
nikì) dktuo fanetai sto sq ma 2.1. Mia deÔterh sqèsh enai oi oikonomikè
sunallagè (Flobusiness), pou èqoun metaxÔ tou oi oikogèneie autè .

Mèsw tou peribˆllonto R, fort¸noume to statnet, kaj¸ kai ti biblio-


j ke ergm (gia thn anˆlush twn montèlwn ekjetik¸n tuqawn grafhmˆtwn
Markov) kai sna (gia ti analÔsei koinwnik¸n diktÔwn):

R> library(statnet)
R> library(ergm)
R> library(sna)

Gia na doÔme to sÔnolo twn dedomènwn, pou enai diajèsima sto statnet, ekte-
loÔme:

R> data()

En suneqea, fort¸noume ta dedomèna tou diktÔou Florentine, pou sqhmatzo-


ntai apì ti sqèsei Flomarriage kai Flobusiness:

R> data(florentine)

Gia na doÔme ta diktuakˆ dedomèna twn sqèsewn Flomarriage, ekteloÔme:

R> flomarriage

kai parnoume:

Network attributes:
vertices = 16
directed = FALSE
hyper = FALSE
loops = FALSE
multiple = FALSE
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 32

total edges= 20
Vertex attribute names:
vertex.names wealth priorates totalties
edgelist matrix:
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 9 1
[2,] 6 2
[3,] 7 2
[4,] 9 2
[5,] 5 3
[6,] 9 3
[7,] 7 4
[8,] 11 4
[9,] 15 4
[10,] 11 5
[11,] 15 5
[12,] 8 7
[13,] 16 7
[14,] 13 9
[15,] 14 9
[16,] 16 9
[17,] 14 10
[18,] 15 11
[19,] 15 13
[20,] 16 13

'Etsi, blèpoume ìti to dktuo Flomarriage perièqei 16 korufè (oikogèneie )


kai 20 akmè (gˆmoi). H grafik  anaparˆstash tou diktÔou autoÔ gnetai
mèsw th entol  :

R> plot(flomarriage)

ìpou lambˆnoume to kˆtwji sq ma:

Sq ma 2.1: To dktuo Flomarriage.


2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 33

2.2 Prosarmog  Montèlou EkjetikoÔ Tuqaou


Graf mato

Ja xekin soume me to pio aplì montèlo pou upˆrqei, to opoo enai gnwstì


w montèlo Bernoulli   Erdös - Rényi. H entol  gia na to ektelèsoume enai:

R> flomodel1.01 <- ergm(flomarriage~edges)

ìpou lambˆnoume:

Newton-Raphson iterations: 5

MLE Coefficients:
edges
-1.609

Mia arketˆ pio eÔqrhsth, pio analutik  kai qwr perittè plhrofore entol 
enai h kˆtwji:

R> summary(flomodel1.01)

ìpou parnoume:

==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================

Formula: flomarriage ~ edges

Newton-Raphson iterations: 5

Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -1.6094 0.2449 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’
0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1

Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood
and are suspect.

Null Pseudo-deviance: 166.355 on 120 degrees of freedom


Residual Pseudo-deviance: 108.135 on 119 degrees of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 58.221 on 1 degrees of freedom

AIC: 110.13 BIC: 112.92


2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 34

Autì pou ma endiafèrei ˆmesa enai h ermhnea tou montèlou. Apì ì,ti blè-
poume, to log-odds na upˆrqei mia akm  enai −1.609, me antstoiqh pijanìth-
ta 0.1667275 (= exp(−1.609)/[1 + exp(−1.609)]). To apotèlesma autì to
perimèname dedomènou ìti h puknìthta tou diktÔou upologzetai ìti enai sh
me 0.16 (= 20/(16 ∗ 15/2)).

Mia prosarmog  pou mporoÔme na dialèxoume anafèretai tìso sti akmè ìso
kai ta trgwna:
R> flomodel.02 <- ergm(flomarriage~edges+triangle)
me apotelèsmata:
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================

Formula: flomarriage ~ edges + triangle

Newton-Raphson iterations: 16 MCMC sample of size 10000

Monte Carlo MLE Results:


Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -1.6741 0.3509 0.004 <1e-04 triangle 0.1578
0.5904 0.007 0.79
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05
‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1

Null Deviance: 166.355 on 120 degrees of freedom


Residual Deviance: 107.874 on 118 degrees of freedom
Deviance: 58.481 on 2 degrees of freedom

AIC: 111.87 BIC: 117.45


A doÔme pˆli p¸ ermhneÔetai to parapˆnw dktuo. To log-odds na upˆr-
qei mia akm  metaxÔ dÔo koruf¸n enai −1.674 (qwr h akm  na prosjètei
kˆpoio trgwno sto dktuo). An h akm  prosjèsei èna akrib¸ trgwno sto
dktuo to log-odds metabˆlletai w ex  : −1.674 + 0.158 = −1.516, an pro-
sjèsei dÔo akrib¸ trgwna sto dktuo to log-odds metabˆlletai w ex  :
−1.674 + 0.158 ∗ 2 = −1.358, k.o.k.

Oi antstoiqe pijanìthte ja enai se me:

exp(−1.674)/(1 + exp(−1.674)) = 0.158,


exp(−1.516)/(1 + exp(−1.516)) = 0.180 kai
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 35

exp(−1.358)/(1 + exp(−1.358)) = 0.204

Mia polÔ shmantik  parat rhsh, h opoa gia pr¸th forˆ epishmanetai se


autì to shmeo, allˆ ja epanalhfje arketè forè se ìlh thn ergasa, apo-
tele to gegonì ìti ta arijmhtikˆ apotelèsmata, dedomènou ìti anaferìmaste
se stoqastikè diadikase , ja diafèroun apì ektèlesh se epanektèlesh, allˆ
ìqi katˆ polÔ. H diaforopohsh ja auxˆnetai shmantikˆ, ìtan to prosarmo-
smèno montèlo ekfulzetai (ìpw ja doÔme parakˆtw).

Ta antikemena tou R katèqoun pˆnta mia klˆsh. Gia na doÔme thn klˆsh tou
flomodel.02, den èqoume parˆ na ektelèsoume thn entol :

R> class(flomodel.02)

ìpou lambˆnoume:

[1] "ergm"

'Ena ˆllo montèlo prosarmog  enai to ex  , sto opoo ddetai barÔthta sto
qarakthristikì “wealth”:

R> flomodel.03 <- ergm(flomarriage~edges+nodemain("wealth"))

me antstoiqa apotèlesma:

R> summary(flomodel.03)
==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================

Formula: flomarriage ~ edges + nodemain("wealth")

Newton-Raphson iterations: 4

Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -2.594929 0.536056 NA <1e-04 ***
nodecov.wealth 0.010546 0.004674 NA 0.0259 *
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05
‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1

Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood
and are suspect.
Null Pseudo-deviance: 166.355 on 120 degrees of freedom
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 36

Residual Pseudo-deviance: 103.109 on 118 degrees of freedom


Pseudo-deviance: 63.247 on 2 degrees of freedom
AIC: 107.11 BIC: 112.68

2.3 Statistikè DiktÔou

Arqikˆ a doÔme ta ergalea, ta opoa ma parèqei to R kai ta pakèta statnet,


ermg kai sna, gia th statistik  melèth twn diktÔwn. Gia na pˆroume th lsta
twn diajèsimwn statistik¸n analÔsewn, ekteloÔme thn entol :

R> help("ergm-terms")

Ta onìmata twn statistik¸n analÔsewn, pou prokÔptoun me thn ektèlesh th


prohgoÔmenh entol  , qrhsimopoioÔntai san orsmata entì parenjèsewn:

ergm (prosarmog  enì ergm montèlou)


simulate (prosomowsh grafhmˆtwn apì mia ergm prosarmog )
summary (perlhyh statistik¸n analÔsewn)

O kˆtwji pnaka ma ddei tou ìrou autoÔ kai ta aparathta proairetikˆ


orsmatˆ tou :

Term Undir? Dir? Required Optional

Basic terms
Edges X X
mutual X

Nodal attribute terms


Nodecov X X attrname
(nodemain) X X attrname
(nodefactor) X X attrname
Receivercov X attrname
Sendercov X attrname
Nodemix X X attrname
Nodematch X X attrname
absdiff X X attrname
smalldiff X X attrname

Relational attribute terms


dyadcov X X attrname
hamming X X network
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 37

Degree terms
degree X vec. of degrees attrname
idegree X vec. of degrees attrname
odegree X vec. of degrees attrname
gwdegree X alpha, fixed
isolates X

Star terms
Kstar X vec. of degrees attrname
istar X vec. of degrees attrname
ostar X vec. of degrees attrname
m2star X

Cycle and triangle terms


triangle X X attrname
ctriad X attrname
ttriad X attrname
tripercent X X attrname
cycle X X vec. of cycle sizes

Actor-specific effects
receiver X
sender X
sociality X

Shared partner terms


esp (edgewise shared) X vec. of partners#s
dsp X vec. of partners#s
gwesp X alpha, fixed
gwdsp X alpha, fixed

Bounded terms
bounded.degree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.idegree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.odegree X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.kstar X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.istar X bound, vec. of degrees
bounded.ostar X bound, vec. of degrees

2.4 Prosomowsh DiktÔou

Autì pou ma endiafèrei sthn prosomowsh enai katˆ pìso ja lˆboume dktua,
ta stoiqea twn opown antapokrnontai qwr idiatere apoklsei sta arqikˆ
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 38

dedomèna. Gia na to kˆnoume autì, qrhsimopoioÔme thn ex  entol :


R> flomodel.03.sim <- simulate(flomodel.03,nsim=10)
H parapˆnw entol  ja dhmiourg sei 10 dktua, ìpw fanetai apì to ìrisma
nsim=10, to opoo diaforetikˆ mpore na ekteleste apì thn entol :

R> length(flomodel.03.sim$networks) [1] 10


Gia na doÔme ektenèstera ti apotelèsmata prokÔptoun apì aut n thn pro-
somowsh, ekteloÔme:
R> flomodel.03.sim$networks [[1]] Network attributes:
vertices = 16
directed = FALSE
loops = FALSE
total edges= 19
Vertex attribute names:
vertex.names wealth priorates totalties
edgelist matrix:
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 13 1
[2,] 15 1
[3,] 6 2
[4,] 15 2
[5,] 7 3
[6,] 8 3
[7,] 9 3
[8,] 7 4
[9,] 15 4
[10,] 14 5
[11,] 9 6
[12,] 9 7
[13,] 10 7
[14,] 11 7
[15,] 16 7
[16,] 16 9
[17,] 11 10
[18,] 12 10
[19,] 15 14
Sta apotelèsmata autˆ, an anatrèxoume sta arqikˆ dedomèna tou diktÔou,
blèpoume ìti èqoume elˆqisth apìklish me autˆ. Autì to gegonì faner¸nei
me xekˆjaro trìpo ìti kˆname mia kal  prosarmog , ìson aforˆ to montèlo
pou epilèxame. Mia grafik  anaparˆstash tou montèlou ma se autì to shmeo
ja ma dexei ti diaforè me to arqikì dktuo:
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 39

R> plot(flomodel.03.sim$networks [[1]])

Sq ma 2.2: H prosomowsh tou prosarmosmènou diktÔou Flomarriage.

2.5 Prosarmog  Montèlou

Ja elègxoume ed¸ katˆ pìso kalˆ ta montèla ma prosarmìsthkan sta arqikˆ


ma dedomèna, sugkrnonta thn omoiìthta twn prosomoiwmènwn grafhmˆtwn
me to arqikì dktuo. Oi entolè pou prèpei na ektelèsoume enai oi ex  :

R> flomodel.03.gof <- gof(flomodel.03~degree,verbose=TRUE) R>


flomodel.03.gof R> plot(flomodel.03.gof)

H pr¸th kai deÔterh entol  èqoun w apotelèsmata:

Goodness-of-fit for degree


obs min mean max MC p-value
0 1 0 1.26 4 1.00
1 4 0 3.25 7 0.86
2 2 1 4.31 9 0.30
3 6 0 3.52 8 0.24
4 2 0 1.99 6 1.00
5 0 0 1.03 6 0.80
6 1 0 0.38 2 0.74
7 0 0 0.19 2 1.00
8 0 0 0.04 1 1.00
9 0 0 0.03 1 1.00
10 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
11 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 40

12 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
13 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
14 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
15 0 0 0.00 0 1.00
en¸ apì thn trth entol  kai thn diˆgnwsh th poiìthta th prosarmog 
prokÔptei to parakˆtw sq ma.

Goodness−of−fit diagnostics
0.5
0.4
proportion of nodes

0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

degree

Sq ma 2.3: Diˆgnwsh poiìthta prosarmog  .

2.6 Ekfulismì kai Diagnwstikˆ

Enai gegonì ìti ìso kalÔterh enai h poiìthta prosarmog  twn prosomoi-
wmènwn diktÔwn, se sqèsh pˆnta me to upì melèth dktuo, tìso kalÔterh enai
h ektmhsh th sunˆrthsh pijanofˆneia . To qeirìtero senˆrio pou mporoÔ-
me na bi¸soume enai ta prosomoiwmèna dktua na enai telew diaforetikˆ apì
to parathroÔmeno dktuo. Autì mpore na sumbe gia duo lìgou . O pr¸to
mpore na enai h apotuqa sÔgklish tou algorjmou prosomowsh . O ˆllo
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 41

lìgo sumbanei ìtan oi parˆmetroi tou montèlou, pou qrhsimopoioÔntai gia


thn prosomowsh, apèqoun arketˆ apì ta MLE. O deÔtero lìgo profan¸
mpore na diorjwje me thn epilog  katˆllhlwn paramètrwn.

A jewr soume loipìn arqikˆ kˆpoia diagnwstikˆ gia thn akrbeia tou algor-
jmou prosomowsh kai trìpou beltws  tou:

R> args(ergm) R> fit


<-ergm(flobusiness~edges+kstar(2:3)+triangle,interval=1, R+
burnin=0)

me apotelèsmata:

Iteration 1 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.4807


Iteration 2 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.3952
Iteration 3 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.07912
The instability of the model is: 2.8 Instabilities greater than 1
suggest the model is degenerate.

Gia na doÔme ta diagnwstikˆ pou parˆqjhkan:

R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)
Correlations of sample statistics:
, , cor
edges kstar2 kstar3 triangle
edges 1.0000000 0.8999023 0.7366523 0.4254382
kstar2 0.8999023 1.0000000 0.9510883 0.7219644
kstar3 0.7366523 0.9510883 1.0000000 0.8255294
triangle 0.4254382 0.7219644 0.8255294 1.0000000

, , lag1

edges kstar2 kstar3 triangle


edges 0.9894460 0.8893688 0.7261010 0.4216108
kstar2 0.8885878 0.9854299 0.9347240 0.7151514
kstar3 0.7253073 0.9345277 0.9793106 0.8167149
triangle 0.4213451 0.7154938 0.8173699 0.9934285

A elègxoume sto shmeo autì mia prokajorismènh prosarmog  montèlou:

R> fit <- ergm(flobusiness~edges+kstar(2:3)+triangle)

Iteration 1 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.452


Iteration 2 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.2689
Iteration 3 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.005294
The instability of the model is: 3.2 Instabilities greater than 1
2 TO DŸ
IKTUO FLORENTINE 42

suggest the model is degenerate.

R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)

edges kstar2 kstar3 triangle


edges 1.0000000 0.9502753 0.8492467 0.6948506
kstar2 0.9502753 1.0000000 0.9649674 0.8305583
kstar3 0.8492467 0.9649674 1.0000000 0.8647073
triangle 0.6948506 0.8305583 0.8647073 1.0000000

, , lag1

edges kstar2 kstar3 triangle


edges 0.5499252 0.5173059 0.4474066 0.4277306
kstar2 0.5205708 0.5097784 0.4559730 0.4665123
kstar3 0.4502072 0.4566472 0.4203904 0.4513915
triangle 0.4299360 0.4647376 0.4463613 0.5385043

Akìmh endiafèron ja  tan na dhmiourg soume to sunduasmèno dktuo akm¸n


kai gia ti dÔo sqèsei maz Flomarriage kai Flobusiness:

R> combined <-


network((flobusiness+flomarriage)[,],directed=FALSE)

R> fit <- ergm(combined~triangle)

Iteration 1 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.1311


Iteration 2 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.2338
Iteration 3 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 0.007697

R> mcmc.diagnostics(fit,center=F)

Correlations of sample statistics:


triangle
triangle 0.02229741
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 43

3 To Dktuo FMH
3.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔou

To deÔtero parˆdeigma enai èna dktuo fila , pˆnw sto opoo ja efarmìsoume
ti analÔsei th mejodologa tou montèlou ekjetikoÔ tuqaou graf mato
Markov, sÔmfwna me ti shmei¸sei tou seminarou gia to statnet kai to ergm
twn Goodreau et al. (2008) [10℄. Autì to dktuo apoteletai apì sqèsei fi-
la metaxÔ twn majht¸n tou gumnasou Faux Magnolia High, pou brsketai
sti anatolikè HPA. Se autì to dktuo ja anaferìmaste me to akrwnÔmio
FMH.

AfoÔ fort¸soume to statnet kai ti biblioj ke tou ergm kai tou sna,
diabˆzoume ta dedomèna tou diktÔou Faux Magnolia High:

R> data(faux.magnolia.high)
To dktuo autì to metonomˆzoume fmh:

R> fmh <- faux.magnolia.high


H entol  pou ma dnei analutikˆ ti perilambˆnei to dktuo enai:

R> fmh
Dedomènou ìmw ìti to apotèlesma th prohgoÔmenh entol  enai idiate-
ra ektetamèno (perilambˆnei kai th lsta akm¸n tou diktÔou), mporoÔme na
ektelèsoume thn dia entol  me thn parakˆtw sÔntomh morf :

R> summary(fmh)
opìte parnoume:

Network attributes:

vertices: 1461

directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 44

logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1

total edges= 974

density = 0.000913242

Vertex attributes:

vertex.names:

Length Class Mode


1461 character character

Race: Asian Black Hisp NatAm Other White


48 261 68 24 7 1053

Grade:
7 8 9 10 11 12
185 210 317 299 257 193

Sex:
F M
768 693

Blèpoume ìti to dktuo èqei 1461 korufè kai 974 akmè . Profan¸ , upˆr-
qoun pollè memonwmène korufè (memonwmènoi majhtè ). Epsh , blèpoume
ìti oi korufè (majhtè ) èqoun tra qarakthristikˆ: ful , bajmologa kai
fÔlo (majht¸n).

Gia na doÔme to dktuo FMH qwr ti memonwmène korufè ekteloÔme thn


entol :

R> plot(fmh,displayisolates=FALSE)

kai prokÔptei to dktuo, pou fanetai sto sq ma 3.1.

'Opw blèpoume, upˆrqei mia megˆlh sunist¸sa kai arketè ˆlle , fanerˆ
mikrìtere . Prèpei na poÔme pˆli ìti èqoume {afairèsei} ti memonwmène
korufè . An den ti afairoÔsame, ja proèkupte èna arketˆ pio puknì kai
{dusanˆgnwsto} dktuo, pou fanetai sto sq ma 3.2.
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 45

Sq ma 3.1: To dktuo FMH qwr ti memonwmène korufè .

Gia na pˆroume t¸ra thn katanom  twn sunistws¸n tou diktÔou ekteloÔme
thn entol :

R> table(component.dist(fmh)$csize)

h opoa dnei:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 19 23 439
524 64 29 11 12 4 7 4 1 1 1 1 1 1
MporoÔme na sqediˆsoume to dktuo me ti korufè qrwmatismène anˆloga
th bajmologa twn majht¸n (sq ma 3.3). H entol  èqei w ex  :

R> plot(fmh,displayisolates=FALSE,vertex.col="Grade")
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 46

Sq ma 3.2: To dktuo FMH me ti memonwmène korufè .

Gia na doÔme thn katanom  twn bajm¸n (degrees) twn koruf¸n:

R> fmh.degreedist<-table(degree(fmh,cmode="indegree"))
R> fmh.degreedist
parnoume:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
524 403 271 128 85 30 13 5 2
H entol  aut  mpore na pˆrei kai thn ex  morf :

R> summary(fmh~degree(0:8))
Gia thn katanom  twn bajm¸n anˆloga me ta qarakthristikˆ twn majht¸n, h
entol  enai:
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 47

Sq ma 3.3: To dktuo FMH (qwr ti memonwmène korufè ) me ti korufè


qrwmatismène anˆloga th bajmologa twn majht¸n.

R> summary(fmh~degree(0:8,"Attribute")),
ìpou sth jèsh tou Attribute bˆzoume, katˆ antistoiqa, autì pou ma en-
diafèrei (Grade, Sex, Race).

Kˆti idiatera endiafèron enai ta trgwna, ta opoa emfanzontai sto dktuo


FMH. H entol  gia thn arjmhsh twn trig¸nwn èqei w ex  :
R> summary(fmh~triangle)
me apotèlesma:
triangle
169
Mia entol  pou mpore na dexei to p¸ dhmiourgoÔntai oi file anˆloga me
ta qarakthristikˆ enai h mixingmatrix. A th doÔme p¸ efarmìzetai gia
ta tra qarakthristikˆ tou diktÔou:
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 48

R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Grade")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 110 11 3 3 0 0
8 11 165 9 7 0 2
9 3 9 152 24 10 4
10 3 7 24 151 38 11
11 0 0 10 38 152 32
12 0 2 4 11 32 90

R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Sex")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
F M
F 430 285
M 285 259

R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Race")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
Asian Black Hisp NatAm Other White
Asian 7 4 0 1 0 35
Black 4 85 9 3 0 57
Hisp 0 9 1 0 0 48
NatAm 1 3 0 3 0 25
Other 0 0 0 0 0 5
White 35 57 48 25 5 691

'Opw blèpoume, h kÔria diag¸nio tou mixing matrix gia th bajmologa


èqei arketˆ megalÔtere timè apì ìla ta ˆlla stoiqea tou pnaka. Autì ma
deqnei ìti majhtè me dia bajmologa èqoun thn tˆsh na sunˆptoun euko-
lìtera filikè sqèsei metaxÔ tou . Allˆ ìmw , den fanetai na isqÔei kˆti
antstoiqo gia to fÔlo   th ful  twn majht¸n.
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 49

3.2 Prosarmog  Montèlou EkjetikoÔ Tuqaou


Graf mato

H melèth ja xekin sei, ìpw kai sthn prohgoÔmenh anˆlush tou diktÔou Flo-
rentine, me to pio aplì montèlo pou upˆrqei, to montèlo Bernoulli   Erdös -
Rényi. 'Eqoume loipìn:

R> model1<-ergm(fmh~edges)
R> summary(model1)

kai parnoume:

==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================

Formula: fmh ~ edges

Newton-Raphson iterations: 8

Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -6.99760 0.03205 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’
0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1

Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive
pseudolikelihood and are suspect.

Null Pseudo-deviance: 1478525 on 1066530 deg. of freedom


Residual Pseudo-deviance: 15580 on 1066529 deg. of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 1462944 on 1 deg. of freedom

AIC: 15582 BIC: 15594

Eˆn autì to dktuo eqe paraqje apì to sugkekrimèno montèlo, tìte h ektmh-
sh (log-odds) gia ti akmè ja  tan sh me −6.998. 'Ara h pijanìthta na
upˆrqei kˆpoia akm  enai exp(−6.998)/(1 + exp(−6.998)) = 0.000913. H en-
tol  summary(fmh) ma deqnei ìti h puknìthta tou diktÔou enai ìntw sh me
0.000913, dhlad , to phlko twn akm¸n tou graf mato pro ìle ti dunatè
akmè pou ja mporoÔse na èqei to grˆfhma (974/((1461 ∗ 1460)/2)).

H entol  ergm perilambˆnei pollˆ antikemena, ta opoa mporoÔme na doÔme


¸ ex  :
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 50

R> names(model1)
[1]"coef" "sample" "iterations" "mle.lik"
"MCMCtheta" "loglikelihoodratio" "gradient"
[8]"hessian" "covar" "samplesize" "failure"
"mc.se" "glm" "glm.null"
[15]"null.deviance" "aic" "theta1"
"offset" "drop" "network" "newnetwork"
[22]"formula" "constraints" "prop.weights"

'Omw ta plèon endiafèronta stoiqea gia thn anˆlus  kai thn sÔgkrish tou
montèlou enai oi suntelestè (coefficients) kai h pijanofˆneia (likelihood):

R> model1$coef
edges
-6.997596
R> model1$mle.lik
[1] -7790.104

'Opw gnwrzoume apì ti empeire th efhbea , oi sqèsei fila sto Gumnˆsi-


o den enai tuqae . To er¸thma pou tjetai enai p¸ mporoÔme na anakalÔyou-
me enallaktikè upojèsei gia thn upˆrqousa dom  kai gia th diadikasa pou
th dhmioÔrghse. H apˆnthsh ddetai apì ti pollè dunatìthte montelopo-
hsh th mejodologa pou meletˆme.

'Ena kalì montèlo, gia na arqsoume, enai autì pou protenei mia tˆsh gia
taxinomhmènh anˆmeixh - dhlad , ìti upˆrqei megalÔterh pijanìthta sqhmati-
smoÔ sundèsewn metaxÔ atìmwn th dia ful  , fÔlou   bajmologa . Au-
tì to montèlo enai to katˆllhlo gia na proqwr soume thn èreuna, dedomè-
nou ìti emfanzei duadik  anexarthsa. 'Opw exhgetai apì tou Hunter et
al. (2008b) [16], tètoia montèla jewroÔntai genik¸ ìti enai pio eÔkolo na
prosarmostoÔn apì ìti ˆlla montèla kai h diadikasa prosarmog  aut  kˆje
aut  den ephreˆzetai apì to eˆn to montèlo enai akatˆllhlo gia ta dedomèna.
Se aut n thn perptwsh autì apotele epsh mia arketˆ logik  upìjesh pou
mpore na protaje gia tètoia montèla.

A elègxoume loipìn thn tˆsh gia taxinomhmènh anˆmeixh, h opoa enai omoiìmor-
fh gia kˆje klˆsh qarakthristik¸n dhlad , thn perptwsh pou upˆrqei h
dia tˆsh gia sÔnayh sqèsewn metaxÔ majht¸n th dia ful  (gia parˆdeig-
ma), anexˆrthta apì th ful , sthn opoa anaferìmaste. Autì to montèlo
mpore na prosarmoste qrhsimopoi¸nta thn entol  nodematch me to proka-
jorismèno ìrisma th diff=FALSE:

R> model2 <- ergm(fmh~edges+nodematch("Grade")+nodematch


R+ ("Race")+nodematch("Sex"))
R> summary(model2)
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 51

Opìte parnoume:

==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================
Formula: fmh ~ edges + nodematch("Grade") + nodematch("Race") +
nodematch("Sex")
Newton-Raphson iterations: 9
Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -10.01277 0.11526 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Grade 3.23105 0.08788 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Race 1.19646 0.08147 NA <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Sex 0.88438 0.07057 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’
0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1
Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive
pseudolikelihood and are suspect.
Null Pseudo-deviance: 1478525 on 1066530 deg. of freedom
Residual Pseudo-deviance: 13057 on 1066526 deg. of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 1465467 on 4 deg. of freedom
AIC: 13065 BIC: 13113

A doÔme pio sunoptikˆ ìmw autˆ pou ma endiafèroun ˆmesa:

R> model2$coef

edges nodematch.Grade nodematch.Race nodematch.Sex


-10.0127658 3.2310453 1.1964585 0.8843782

kai

R> model2$mle.lik [1] -6528.714

Blèpoume ìti kai oi tèsserei ìroi enai shmantiko. Epsh blèpoume mia dra-
matik  aÔxhsh sthn pijanofˆneia tou montèlou autoÔ se sqèsh me to pr¸to
montèlo. Ja mporoÔse kane na èkane, an  jele, ènan tupikì èlegqo tou
lìgou pijanofanei¸n metaxÔ twn dÔo montèlwn.

H ermhnea twn suntelest¸n autoÔ tou montèlou enai sqetik¸ apl : to


log-odds enì desmoÔ, pou enai pl rw eterogen  (ta duo mèlh diafèroun
w pro th ful , to fÔlo kai th bajmologa) enai −10.01. To log-odds
enì desmoÔ, pou enai omoiogen  mìno w prì th ful , enai −8.8163073
(= −10.0127658+1.1964585). Epiprìsjeta, èna desmì , omoiogen  w pro
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 52

th bajmologa, èqei log-odds −6.7817205 (= −10.0127658 + 3.2310453), e-


n¸, w prì to fÔlo, −9.1283876 (= −10.0127658 + 0.8843782). Tèlo ,
èna desmì , pou enai omoiogen  kai sta tra qarakthristikˆ (ful , fÔlo
kai bajmologa) èqei log-odds −4.7008838 (= −10.0127658 + 3.2310453 +
1.1964585 + 0.8843782).

Ereun¸nta ektenèstera, mporoÔme na doÔme ti akrib¸ sullambˆnei kai ti ìqi


to montèlo pou prosarmìsame, w pro th dom  twn arqik¸n ma dedomènwn.
Gia na to kˆnoume autì, qrhsimopoioÔme thn prosarmog  tou montèlou, pou
 dh èqoume dhmiourg sei, gia na prosomoi¸soume nèa dktua kai na exetˆsoume
katˆ pìso autˆ enai ìmoia   diafèroun apì ta dedomèna ma . H prosomowsh
diktÔwn sto ergm gnetai mèsw th entol  simulate:

R> sim2<-simulate(model2,burnin=1e+6,verbose=TRUE) Starting 1


MCMC iteration of 1e+06 steps.
TNT sampler accepted 32.995% of 1000000 proposed steps.

Apì ìti blèpoume, to posostì ton protˆsewn pou gnane dektè enai 33%. 'H,
alli¸ , epeid  allˆxame ton arijmì twn bhmˆtwn sthn alusda th prosomow-
sh (thn tim  tou burn-in) apì ton prokajorismèno arijmì 1.000 se 1.000.000,
mporoÔme na poÔme ìti 330.000 protˆsei apì ti sunolikè 1.000.000 gnane
dektè . Epiprìsjeta, to ìrisma verbose=TRUE ma deqnei sta apotelèsmata
to posostì th epituqa th prosomows  ma .

Kˆti pou krnetai idiaitèrw qr simo enai h exètash twn mixing matrices gia
ta qarakthristikˆ tou diktÔou gia na doÔme p¸ autˆ mporoÔn na sugkrijoÔn:

R> mixingmatrix(sim2,"Sex")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
F M
F 420 295
M 295 290
R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Sex")
F M
F 430 285
M 285 259

R> mixingmatrix(sim2,"Race") Note: Marginal totals can be


misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
Asian Black Hisp NatAm Other White
Asian 0 6 0 0 1 20
Black 6 41 9 0 0 112
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 53

Hisp 0 9 5 1 0 32
NatAm 0 0 1 0 0 16
Other 1 0 0 0 0 2
White 20 112 32 16 2 760

R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Race")
Asian Black Hisp NatAm Other White
Asian 7 4 0 1 0 35
Black 4 85 9 3 0 57
Hisp 0 9 1 0 0 48
NatAm 1 3 0 3 0 25
Other 0 0 0 0 0 5
White 35 57 48 25 5 691

R> mixingmatrix(sim2,"Grade")
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 64 6 9 8 12 3
8 6 89 15 12 4 10
9 9 15 234 14 17 8
10 8 12 14 214 19 10
11 12 4 17 19 146 7
12 3 10 8 10 7 104

R> mixingmatrix(fmh,"Grade")
7 8 9 10 11 12
7 110 11 3 3 0 0
8 11 165 9 7 0 2
9 3 9 152 24 10 4
10 3 7 24 151 38 11
11 0 0 10 38 152 32
12 0 2 4 11 32 90
Epsh , kˆti pou endiafèrei ˆmesa, enai h sÔgkrish th katanom  twn baj-
m¸n:
R> plot(summary(fmh~degree(0:10)),type="l",lty=1)
R> lines(summary(sim2~degree(0:10)),lty=2)
Tèlo , a doÔme kai th sÔgkrish tou pl jou twn trig¸nwn:
R> summary(fmh~triangle) triangle
169
R> summary(sim2~triangle) triangle
2
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 54

500
400
summary(fmh ~ degree(0:10))

300
200
100
0

2 4 6 8 10

Index

Sq ma 3.4: SÔgkrish katanom  bajm¸n metaxÔ twn diktuak¸n dedomènwn


FMH kai tou deÔterou montèlou (model 2).

Apì ìti blèpoume, sta dedomèna upˆrqoun 169 trgwna, en¸ to montèlo th
prosomowsh ma èdwse mìno 2. Fanetai loipìn xekˆjara ìti to sugkekri-
mèno montèlo den sunèlabe th diadikasa, pou dhmioÔrghse ton parathroÔmeno
arijmì twn trig¸nwn.

3.3 Anagn¸rish EkfulismoÔ tou Montèlou

Gia na parathr soume p¸ akrib¸ emfanzetai o ekfulismì sthn prˆxh kai


p¸ gnetai h diˆgnws  tou mèsw th ektmhsh tou montèlou, pou èqoume
epilèxei, ja ergasjoÔme pˆnw se èna sugkekrimèno parˆdeigma. Kat' arq n,
a kˆnoume mia prosarmog  me ìle ti prokajorismène (default) paramètrou
th entol  ergm.

R> model3<-ergm(fmh~edges+triangle)

Iteration 1 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 5.095


Iteration 2 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 5.884
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 55

Iteration 3 of at most 3: the log-likelihood improved by 2.477

The instability of the model is: 2.5 Instabilities greater


than 1 suggest the model is degenerate.

Krnonta apì to teleutao apotèlesma, to montèlo autì enai ekfulismèno.


A analÔsoume ektenèstera th diˆgnwsh gia th diadikasa prosarmog  mo-
ntèlou MCMC:

R> pdf("model3diagnostics.pdf")
R> mcmc.diagnostics(model3)
R> dev.off()

Oi entolè autè dhmiourgoÔn èna arqeo pdf, apì to opoo parnoume to sq -
ma 3.5, ìpou mporoÔme na doÔme ti sumbanei sth statistik  tou montèlou
katˆ thn teleutaa epanˆlhyh th diadikasa ektmhsh MCMC (t¸ra thn
epanˆlhyh 3, epeid  h prokajorismènh tim  tou maxit sto ergm enai 3). Oi
grafikè parastˆsei sto aristerì mèro deqnoun th qronik  metabol  th
alusda , en¸ dexiˆ ta antstoiqa istogrˆmmata. 'Eqei gnei h kanonikopohsh
w pro ta parathroÔmena dedomèna, pou ed¸ antistoiqoÔn sto 0. Se èna
montèlo, pou sugklnei, tètoie statistikè metabˆllontai stoqastikˆ gÔrw
apì th mèsh tim , allˆ den apoklnoun makriˆ apì aut n, ìpw sumbanei
t¸ra. Epomènw , brskoume ìti oi arqikè ma ektim sei gia ti timè twn
suntelest¸n dhmiourgoÔn dktua me polÔ perissìtera trgwna apì autˆ pou
parathroÔntai sta dedomèna, gegonì to opoo kajistˆ adÔnath thn ektmhsh
th mègisth pijanofˆneia . Autì enai mia kal  èndeixh ìti èqoume èna ekfu-
lismèno montèlo.

P¸ alli¸ ja mporoÔsame na aniqneÔame ton ekfulismì? 'Ena ˆllo trìpo


ja  tan h qrhsimopohsh tou orsmato verbose:

R> model3 <- ergm(fmh~edges+triangle,verbose=TRUE)

Sta apotelèsmata parnoume ta parakˆtw:

The density of the returned network is 0.00100512878212521


The density of the original network is 0.00091324200913242
Summary of simulation, relative to observed network:
edges triangle
Min. -165.00000 -36.00000
1st Qu. -61.00000 -7.00000
Median -31.00000 23.00000
Mean -29.52000 32.80000
3rd Qu. -1.00000 70.00000
Max. 150.00000 160.00000
std. err. 0.46992 0.49081
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 56

Sq ma 3.5: Diagnwstik  MCMC tou trtou montèlou.

std. t units. -62.81719 66.81999


p.value dev. 0.00000 0.00000
std. dev. 46.99207 49.08097

Tìte blèpoume ìti se aut n th sugkekrimènh prosomowsh h mèsh tim  th


statistik  akm¸n pèftei èxw pˆra polÔ, ìpw kai twn trig¸nwn. Epiplèon,
to dktuo, pou prokÔptei telikˆ, èqei puknìthta sqedìn dÔo forè megalÔterh
apì thn puknìthta tou arqikoÔ diktÔou. Lìgw th isqur  astˆjeia sthn
prosarmog  tou montèlou, kˆje forˆ pou trèqei kane aut n thn entol  ja
parnei shmantikè diaforè sta apotelèsmata. Autì apotele mia ˆllh akì-
ma èndeixh tou ekfulismoÔ. 'Ena ˆllo trìpo diˆgnwsh , pou qrhsimopoie
thn dia arq , enai na gnei h prosomowsh mèsw twn telik¸n ektim sewn twn
suntelest¸n kai sth sunèqeia na sugkrije to prosomoiwmèno dktuo me to
parathroÔmeno w pro ti diˆfore statistikè tou montèlou.
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 57

Apì thn ˆllh meriˆ, prèpei kane na enai prosektikì na mhn apodeqje po-
lÔ gr gora ton ekfulismì tou montèlou. Ta probl mata sÔgklish , pou
perigrˆfhsan, mporoÔn, se orismène peript¸sei , na ofelontai ìqi epeid 
to montèlo enai ekfulismèno, allˆ apl¸ epeid  h alusda Markov den èqei
afeje na trèxei gia arketˆ megˆlo qronikì diˆsthma ¸ste na mporèsei na ka-
lÔyei to deigmatoq¸ro epark¸ . Idiatera, kˆti tètoio mpore na sumbe, eˆn
oi arqikè timè th ektmhsh brskontai polÔ makriˆ apì thn ektmhsh th
mègisth pijanofˆneia (MLE). Prin loipìn katal xei kane sth diˆgnwsh
tou ekfulismoÔ, ja prèpei na diereun sei kˆpoie epiprìsjete epilogè . Gia
autì to idiatero montèlo, kama apì ti epilogè autè den mpore na bohj sei
shmantikˆ, allˆ ja ti ektelèsoume en edei exˆskhsh .

Mia ˆmesh lÔsh ja  tan h aÔxhsh tou megèjou   diast mato   kai twn dÔo
tou degmato sto MCMC:

R> model3.take2 <- ergm(fmh~edges+triangle,MCMCsamplesize=1e+5,


R+ interval=1000,verbose=TRUE)

Sta apotelèsmata, pro to tèlo , blèpoume ta parakˆtw sqìlia:

Warning:
The network has more than 50000 edges, and the model is
likely to be degenerate.
Warning: The diagnostics indicate that the model is very
unstable.
They suggest that the model is degenerate,
and that the numerical summaries are suspect.

Oi dÔo autè proeidopoi sei apoteloÔn kajarì shmˆdi ìti h sÔgklish èqei


apotÔqei.

Mia ˆllh lÔsh ja  tan h mewsh tou m kou tou b mato   h aÔxhsh tou
sunolikoÔ arijmoÔ epanal yewn   kai ta dÔo:

R> model3.take3 <- ergm(fmh~edges+triangle,maxit=25,


R+ control=control.ergm(steplength=0.25),verbose=TRUE)

Sthn perptwsh aut , merikè forè to montèlo dnei parìmoia sfˆlmata ìpw
to montèlo model3.take2. 'Allote mpore na emfaniste mia tèleia prosarmo-
g , me ti ektim sei twn suntelest¸n na stajeropoioÔntai gÔrw apì to -7.28
kai to 4.95. 'Omw h eustˆjeia aut  enai teqnht : Exetˆzonta ti diagnw-
stikè MCMC kai-  prosomoi¸nonta apì ti arqikè statistikè mporoÔme
na doÔme ìti sthn pragmatikìthta to montèlo apotugqˆnei na sugklnei.

Mia telik  epilog  enai na jewr soume ènan enallaktikì tÔpo apì to MCMC,
pou mpore na eisagˆgei kˆpoiou periorismoÔ sth diadikasa ektmhsh . Sthn
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 58

prokajorismènh tou morf  to MCMC sto ergm den èqei periorismoÔ , allˆ
diabajmzei thn epilog  twn desm¸n (yi,j = 1) kai twn mh desm¸n (yi,j = 0)
ètsi ¸ste na exasfalzetai h epilog  kˆje tˆxh me sunolik  pijanìthta 0.5
anexˆrthta apì thn puknìthta tou diktÔou. Sto statnet h lÔsh aut  o-
nomˆzetai TNT (dhlad , “tie/no-tie”    desmì /mh-desmì ). 'Omw , ja
mporoÔse na epilege mia lÔsh, pou periorzei to deigmatikì q¸ro, p.q., me
th stajeropohsh tou sunolikoÔ arijmoÔ akm¸n   tou bajmoÔ kìmbwn. Autˆ
mporoÔn na epilegoÔn prosjètonta to ìrisma constraints=~edges   con-
straints=~degrees sthn entol  ergm, antistoqw . H lÔsh aut  sthrzetai
sth jewrhtik  pepojhsh ìti oi periorismo mporoÔn na sullˆboun th genik 
idèa th stoqastik  diadikasa pou dièpei to dktuo. An autì de sumbanei,
ja upˆrqei kˆpoio ekfulismì . 'Alle epilogè gia periorismoÔ   diabajm-
sei tou MCMC dnontai sthn ergasa twn Morris et al. (2008) [20]   mporoÔn
na brejoÔn sth bo jeia th entol  ergm.

3.4 Mh Ekfulismèna Montèla Duadik  Exˆrthsh

Sthn paroÔsa enìthta ja melet soume mia apì ti prìsfata protajese sta-


tistikè , h opoa sqetzetai stenˆ me thn parousa twn trig¸nwn kai èqei
apodeiqje sthn prˆxh perissìtero eustaj  ston ekfulismì. Aut  enai h
statistik  GWESP (Geometrically Weighted Edgewise Shared Partner), thn
opoa eqame parousiˆsei jewrhtikˆ sthn enìthta 1.5 (a jumsoume ti basi-
kè bibliografikè anaforè : Snijders et al., 2006 [38], Robins et al., 2007b
[31] kai Hunter, 2007 [15]). Epeid  emaste pepeismènoi se megˆlo bajmì ìti u-
fstantai oi diadikase th taxinomhmènh anˆmeixh se autè ti peript¸sei ,
ja prosjèsoume aut  th nèa statistik  sto montèlo 2. Oi statistikè GW-
ESP èqoun mia parˆmetro klimˆkwsh (α), kaj¸ epsh kai thn parˆmetro
tou sun jou suntelestoÔ. An kai to ergm mpore na kˆnei thn prosarmo-
g  th MLE tautìqrona kai gia ti dÔo paramètrou , genik¸ autì apaite
perissìtero upologistikì qrìno mèqri na ftˆsoume sth sÔgklish. Sthn e-
nìthta aut , qˆrin aplìthta , ja diereun soume ta montèla me stajer  tim  α.

'Otan h parˆmetro klimˆkwsh enai sh me 0, oi statistikè enai isodÔname


me ton arijmì twn akm¸n, pou upˆrqoun se èna toulˆqiston trgwno, en¸,
ìtan tenei sto ˆpeiro, oi statistikè proseggzoun trei forè ton arijmì
twn trig¸nwn. Epiplèon, ìso pio mikrì enai to α, tìso pio pijanì enai to
montèlo ma na mhn enai ekfulismèno. Gia autì, xekinoÔme me tim  tou α kontˆ
sto 0 kai thn auxˆnoume, gia na doÔme katˆ pìso kalˆ ja tairiˆzei to montèlo
sto pragmatikì pl jo twn trig¸nwn.

R> model4.take1 <- ergm(fmh~edges+nodematch("Grade")+


R+ nodematch("Race")+nodematch("Sex")+gwesp(0,fixed=TRUE),
R+ MCMCsamplesize=1e+5,control=control.ergm(steplength=0.25),
R+ maxit=15,verbose=TRUE)
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 59

To pr¸to gegonì pou parathroÔme enai ìti h ektmhsh gia na lˆbei q¸ra
qreiˆzontai apì 15 èw 20 leptˆ, anˆloga me thn isqÔ tou hlektronikoÔ ma u-
pologist . Autì ìmw pou ma endiafèrei ˆmesa kai prèpei na exetˆsoume, kai
sth sunèqeia na apofanjoÔme, enai pìso kalˆ p ge h prosarmog , poiè enai
oi grafikè parastˆsei th diagnwstik  kai pìse akmè kai trgwna h pro-
somowsh perilambˆnei. H ermhnea twn suntelest¸n tou montèlou GWESP
enai pio polÔplokh apì ta prohgoÔmena montèla duadik  anexarthsa :
R> model4.take1$coef

edges nodematch.Grade nodematch.Race nodematch.Sex


-9.8093721 2.7835912 0.9298702 0.7870631

gwesp.fixed.0
1.7899988
W parˆdeigma, ja upojèsoume ìti èqoume èna zeugˆri dr¸ntwn, pou diafè-
roun se ìla ta qarakthristikˆ tou . An den èqoun koinoÔ flou , tìte to
log-odds tou na gnoun floi enai −9.795. Eˆn èqoun ton opoiod pote jetikì
arijmì koin¸n flwn kai kˆje èna apì autoÔ enai se èna toulˆqiston tr-
gwno me ìlou tou ˆllou , tìte to log-odds aut¸n na gnoun floi anèrqetai
se −7.997 (= −9.795 + 1.798). Epiplèon, eˆn to α eqe jetik  tim  (antjeta
me thn perptwsh aut  ìpou α = 0), tìte to log-odds tou na gnoun floi
ja eqe auxhje monìtona (allˆ upì-grammikˆ) w pro ton arijmì twn koin¸n
fil¸n. Eˆn kˆpoioi apì tou koinoÔ flou twn dÔo dr¸ntwn den  tan se
kˆpoia trgwna metaxÔ tou , tìte to log-odds auxˆnetai akìma perissìtero:
sthn perptwsh α = 0, prostjetai to 1.798 gia kˆje akm , pou den enai se
kˆpoio trgwno, kai to 1, ìtan oi dÔo dr¸nte gnoun floi.

A dokimˆsoume t¸ra me kˆpoie diaforetikè timè th paramètrou GWESP:


R> model4.take2 <- ergm(fmh~edges+nodematch("Grade")+
R+ nodematch("Race")+nodematch("Sex")+gwesp(0.1,fixed=TRUE),
R+ MCMCsamplesize=1e+5,control=control.ergm(steplength=0.25),
R+ maxit=15,verbose=TRUE)

R> model4.take3 <- ergm(fmh~edges+nodematch("Grade")+


R+ nodematch("Race")+nodematch("Sex")+gwesp(0.2,fixed=TRUE),
R+ MCMCsamplesize=1e+5,control=control.ergm(steplength=0.25),
R+ maxit=15,verbose=TRUE)
'Opw parathroÔme, oi mìne diaforè sta parapˆnw montèla enai sthn tim 
tou α sto ìrisma tou gwesp. O skopì enai na epanalˆboume autè ti entolè
gia diadoqikˆ uyhlìtere timè tou α, mèqri ìtou to log likehood (logarijmik 
pijanofˆneia) stamatˆ na allˆzei   ìse forè jèloume. O èlegqo th
proseggistik  log likehood tou montèlou gnetai mèsw twn entol¸n:
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 60

R> model4.take1$mle.lik
R> model4.take2$mle.lik
R> model4.take3$mle.lik

me apotelèsmata:

[1] -5604.138

[2] -5550.591

[3] -5500.916

Enallaktikˆ, ja mporoÔsame na prosomoi¸soume èna   perissìtera dktua


kai na sugkrnoume to pl jo twn trig¸nwn tou me to arqikì dktuo.

Prèpei epsh na exetˆsoume tou suntelestè gia ta diˆfora montèla. Autì


to kˆnoume me th qrhsimopohsh th entol  summary, ìpou apì ta apotelèsma-
ta èqoume bgˆlei kˆpoia perittˆ stoiqea:

R> summary(model4.take1)

Formula: fmh ~ edges + nodematch("Grade") + nodematch("Race") +


nodematch("Sex") + gwesp(0, fixed = TRUE)
Newton-Raphson iterations: 36 MCMC sample of size 1e+05
Monte Carlo MLE Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -9.81643 0.11273 0.002 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Grade 2.78393 0.08627 0.001 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Race 0.94487 0.07941 0.001 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Sex 0.78186 0.06873 0.001 <1e-04 ***
gwesp.fixed.0 1.81277 0.05926 0.001 <1e-04 ***
---
AIC: 11218 BIC: 11278

R> summary(model4.take2)

Formula: fmh ~ edges + nodematch("Grade") + nodematch("Race") +


nodematch("Sex") + gwesp(0.1, fixed = TRUE)
Newton-Raphson iterations: 42 MCMC sample of size 1e+05
Monte Carlo MLE Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -9.78293 0.10464 0.002 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Grade 2.75609 0.08795 0.001 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Race 0.91287 0.07449 0.001 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Sex 0.77491 0.06373 0.001 <1e-04 ***
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 61

gwesp.fixed.0.1 1.80179 0.04885 0.001 <1e-04 ***


---
AIC: 11111 BIC: 11171

R> summary(model4.take3)

Formula: fmh ~ edges + nodematch("Grade") + nodematch("Race") +


nodematch("Sex") + gwesp(0.2, fixed = TRUE)
Newton-Raphson iterations: 39 MCMC sample of size 1e+05
Monte Carlo MLE Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -9.77943 0.10872 0.002 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Grade 2.75865 0.09404 0.002 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Race 0.89179 0.07415 0.001 <1e-04 ***
nodematch.Sex 0.78109 0.07066 0.001 <1e-04 ***
gwesp.fixed.0.2 1.79231 0.05958 0.001 <1e-04 ***

AIC: 11012 BIC: 11071

ParathroÔme ìti, anexˆrthta th tim  tou α, ìloi oi ìroi enai statistikˆ sh-
mantiko kai oi suntelestè den allˆzoun katˆ polÔ. Epilègoume thn perptw-
sh α = 0.2, gia na suneqsoume (ja mporoÔsame na eqame pˆrei opoiad pote
ˆllh tim ):

R> model4 <- model4.take3

Sto sq ma 3.6 sugkrnoume ta tra m  ekfulismèna montèla w pro th loga-


rijmik  pijanofˆneia kai tou suntelestè . Blèpoume ìti to montèlo 4 prˆgma-
ti belti¸nei thn pijanofˆneia. ParathroÔme epsh th diaforˆ metaxÔ twn
suntelest¸n tou montèlou 4 kai tou montèlou 2: oi suntelestè auto elat-
t¸nontai me thn statistik  twn nèwn trig¸nwn, en¸ oi akmè auxˆnontai (dh-
lad , gnontai ligìtero arnhtiko). T¸ra, èna omoiogen  desmì , pou klenei
èna trgwno, enai perissìtero pijanì apì ènan desmì, pou den klenei èna
trgwno, en¸ kai oi dÔo enai perissìtero pijano apì tou antstoiqou ete-
rogene desmoÔ .

3.5 Poiìthta Prosarmog 

H sÔgkrish enì memonwmènou apotelèsmato th prosomowsh me to arqikì


dktuo èqei periorismènh axa. To epìmeno logikì b ma, t¸ra pou èqoume èna
montèlo, to opoo arqzei na sullambˆnei ikanopoihtikˆ th dom  tou arqikoÔ
diktÔou, enai na prosomoi¸soume pollˆ dktua kai na sugkrnoume thn pl rh
katanom  twn statistik¸n, pou ma endiafèroun, me ta parathroÔmena dedo-
mèna. A suneqsoume loipìn me to montèlo 4, prospaj¸nta na doÔme an
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 62

Sq ma 3.6: SÔgkrish montèlwn.

enai pio apotelesmatikì w pro thn arjmhsh twn trig¸nwn apì to montèlo
2. Ja qrhsimopoi soume èna megˆlo diˆsthma deigmˆtwn, gia na elattwje o
suntelest  auto-susqètish metaxÔ diadoqik¸n deigmˆtwn:

R> sim4 <-simulate(model4,burnin=1e+5,interval=1e+5,nsim=100,


R+ verbose=TRUE)

ParathroÔme ìti to posostì twn apodekt¸n bhmˆtwn paramènei sto 33% pe-
rpou dia mèsou th alusda sunolikoÔ m kou 107 , kˆti pou apotele kalì
shmˆdi mh ekfulismoÔ. Epeid  prosomoi¸noume perissìtera apì èna dktua
(100 prosomoi¸sei ), to sim4 enai antikemeno diaforetik  klˆsh apì to
sim1:

R> class(sim4)
[1] "network.series"
R> names(sim4)
[1] "formula" "networks" "stats" "coef"
R> class(sim4$networks[[1]])
[1] "network"

Gia na pˆroume to pl jo twn trig¸nwn sto kˆje èna apì ta 100 dktua, ja
prèpei na qrhsimopoi soume ton parakˆtw k¸dika tou R:

R> model4.tridist<-sapply(1:100,function(x){summary(sim4
R+ $networks[[x]]~triangle)})

A doÔme p¸ aut  h katanom  sugkrnetai me thn arqik  (sq ma 3.7):

R> hist(model4.tridist,xlim=c(50,200))
R> fmh.tri <- summary(fmh~triangle)
R> arrows(fmh.tri,20,fmh.tri,5,col="red",lwd=3)

Me thn entol :
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 63

Histogram of model4.tridist
30
25
20
Frequency

15
10
5
0

50 100 150 200

model4.tridist

Sq ma 3.7: SÔgkrish trig¸nwn se 100 prosomoi¸sei tou montèlou 4 (istì-


gramma) kai twn arqik¸n dedomènwn (kìkkino bèlo ).

R> sum(fmh.tri <= model4.tridist)


mporoÔme na doÔme pìse prosomoi¸sei  san toulˆqiston to dio akrae me
thn parathroÔmenh tim  mìno sthn pˆnw ourˆ th katanom  . H apˆnthsh
enai 0 apì ti 100. Ta dedomèna ma saf¸ brskontai èxw apì to kentrikì
tm ma tou 95% th prosomoioÔmenh katanom  , molonìti to montèlo 4 apo-
tele mia shmantik  beltwsh tou montèlou 2 w pro to pl jo twn trig¸nwn.

Oi Goodreau et al. (2008) [10] èqoun anaptÔxei kˆpoion k¸dika, pou ulopoie
autìmata ìle ti parapˆnw fˆsei poiìthta prosarmog  gia kˆpoie koinè
katanomè diktÔwn. Autè perilambˆnoun thn katanom  bajm¸n, thn katanom 
twn akmiakˆ diamoirasmènwn etarwn (edgewise shared partners, dhlad , to
pl jo twn akm¸n, sti opoe dÔo floi èqoun akrib¸ k koinoÔ flou )
kai thn gewdaitik  katanom  (to pl jo twn zeug¸n dr¸ntwn gia ta opoa
h plhsièsterh metaxÔ tou diadrom  èqei m ko k, gia kˆje tim  tou k). A
dokimˆsoume pr¸ta na doÔme thn katanom  twn bajm¸n:
R> gof4.deg <- gof(model4~degree,verbose=TRUE,burnin=1e+5,
R+ interval=1e+5)
O k¸dika autì prosomoi¸nei èna pl jo diktÔwn (me prokajorismènh tim 
100), upologzei ti statistikè gia autˆ se sqèsh me to arqikì dktuo, kaj¸
kai ti p-timè . Molonìti ìlh h plhrofora apojhkeÔetai sto antikemeno
gof4.deg kai mpore na diereunhje amèsw , enai mˆllon eukolìtero na exeta-
ste (toulˆqiston arqikˆ) me mia apl  grafik  parˆstash twn dedomènwn.
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 64

Gia na parˆgoume ta boxplots twn prosomoioÔmenwn statistik¸n maz me thn


arqik  statistik , qrhsimopoioÔme thn entol :
R> plot(gof4.deg),

Goodness−of−fit diagnostics
0.4
0.3
proportion of nodes

0.2
0.1
0.0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

degree

Sq ma 3.8: Poiìthta prosarmog  gia bajmoÔ tou montèlou 4.

H grafik  parˆstash, pou prokÔptei, moiˆzei me ekenh tou sq mato 3.8.


H suneq  (qontr ) maÔrh gramm  antistoiqe sthn katanom  bajm¸n tou
arqikoÔ diktÔou. Ta boxplots paristˆnoun thn katanom  pˆnw se ìla ta 100
prosomoioÔmena dktua tou posostoÔ twn koruf¸n me ton antstoiqo bajmì.
Oi diakekommène grammè en¸noun ta tm mata tou 95% aut¸n twn katanom¸n.
Gia ti pragmatikè timè , maz me ti antstoiqe p-timè , prèpei na trèxoume
thn entol :
R> gof4.deg
Tìte ja pˆroume pollè grafikè parastˆsei , pou antistoiqoÔn se ìlou
tou dunatoÔ bajmoÔ , opìte èqoume sugkentrwmène ìle ti endiafèrou-
se plhrofore .
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 65

A parathr soume ìti akìmh kai qwr ti plhrofore gia tou bajmoÔ , to


montèlo autì sullambˆnei polÔ ikanopoihtikˆ thn katanom  bajm¸n tou di-
ktÔou.

T¸ra a pˆme sthn katanom  twn akmiakˆ diamoirasmènwn etarwn kai sthn
katanom  th gewdaitik  apìstash :

R> gof4.esp.dist <- gof(model4~espartners+distance,verbose=TRUE,


R+ burnin=1e+5,interval=1e+5)

Sto sq ma 3.9 èqoume th grafik  parˆstash twn katanom¸n aut¸n sthn
klmaka log-odds, h opoa lambˆnetai apì ti entolè :

R> get(getOption("device"))(width=8,height=4)
R> par(mfrow=c(1,2))
R> plot(gof4.esp.dist,plotlogodds=TRUE)

ParathroÔme ìti h pr¸th gramm  tou parapˆnw k¸dika dhmiourge to parˆ-


juro twn grafik¸n me ti diastˆsei pou zhtoÔme. H grafik  parˆstash
aristerˆ antistoiqe sthn katanom  twn akmiakˆ diamoirasmènwn etarwn. H
statistik  GWESP èqei sumperilhfje sto montèlo san mia parametrik  mor-
f  th katanom  twn akmiakˆ diamoirasmènwn etarwn. Me ton trìpo autì,
sullambˆnoume basikˆ th dom  th katanom  , molonìti to montèlo ma èqei
uperektim sei to pl jo twn akm¸n me ènan diamoirasmèno etaro kai èqei u-
potim sei to antstoiqo pl jo me dÔo   perissìterou etarou .

Apì thn ˆllh pleurˆ, den èqoume sumperilˆbei tpote sqetkì me thn apìstash
sto montèlo ma , parìti h apìstash enai mia sunolik  idiìthta tou diktÔou.
Gia autì, paramènoun anapˆnthta erwt mata ìpw : Pìso kalˆ tairiˆzoun oi
prosomoioÔmene katanomè apìstash me thn parathroÔmenh? PoÔ ofelontai
oi diaforè ? MporoÔme na epektenoume to montèlo, gia na petÔqoume mia
kalÔterh poiìthta prosarmog  ? Tètoia erwt mata diereun¸ntai sth bibli-
ografa, ìpw oi Morris et al. (2008) [20], pou dnoun mia pl rh lsta twn
diajèsimwn orismˆtwn gia aut n th diadikasa.
3 TO DŸ
IKTUO FMH 66

0
Goodness−of−fit diagnostics

0
log−odds for an edge

log−odds for a dyad


−2

−5
−4

−10
−6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 4 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 35 39 43

edge−wise shared partners minimum geodesic distance

Sq ma 3.9: Poiìthta prosarmog  tou montèlou 4 gia thn katanom  twn
akmiakˆ diamoirasmènwn etarwn kai thn katanom  th gewdaitik  apìstash .
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 67

4 Ta Dktua IPRED kai SWPAT


4.1 ExereÔnhsh DiktÔwn

Sto kefˆlaio autì ja asqolhjoÔme me ti analÔsei dÔo diktÔwn sqhmatismè-


nwn apì dr¸nte , oi opooi èqoun sunergaste   sugkrouste metaxÔ tou sth
diamìrfwsh dÔo politik¸n th Eurwpaðk  'Enwsh gia ta pneumatikˆ dikai¸-
mata kai to logismikì (Boudourides & Haunss, 2008 [4]). Ta antstoiqa dÔo
dktua ja anafèrontai w IPRED kai SWPAT. Shmeiwtèon ìti se kˆje parˆ-
grafo arqikˆ ja ergazìmaste me to IPRED kai en suneqea me to SWPAT.

Arqzoume loipìn me thn exereÔnhsh tou diktÔou IPRED. Kat' arq n, prèpei
na kataskeuˆsoume to dktuo (mèsw tou R) apì ta emepirikˆ dedomèna pou è-
qoume. Epeid  ta dedomèna autˆ  tan diajèsima sto SPSS, mèsw tou Excel, ta
eisagˆgame sto statnet. AfoÔ loipìn fort¸soume ta dedomèna, proqwrˆme
sth melèth tou diktÔou.

Arqikˆ, mia metonomasa krnetai aparathth:


R> ipn <- IPRED_Network
Sth sunèqeia, a doÔme thn perigraf  tou diktÔou ma :
R> summary(ipn)

Network attributes:
vertices: 289
directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
total edges= 424
density = 0.01018839
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 68

Vertex attributes:

vertex.names:
Length Class Mode
289 character character
IPRED_Actor_Coalitions:

ALDE Anti-Piracy-Coalition BSA CODE


1 13 62 35
COM EDRi EPP-ED
1 26 1
ETNO Greens-EFA GUE-NGL IFPI
39 1 1 50
MEP NetAlliance Other-Unknown
1 4 53
PSE
1
IPRED_Actor_Types:

Firm Indiv MEP-Party Orgs


122 1 6 160

IPRED_Positions:

Contra Neutral Pro


137 45 107

'Opw blèpoume sto dktuo IPRED èqoume 4 qarakthristikˆ:

• TÔpoi dr¸ntwn: Etaire (mple qr¸ma), 'Atoma (kìkkino qr¸ma), Mèlh


EurwpaðkoÔ Koinoboulou Kìmmata (ktrino qr¸ma) kai Organ¸sei
(prˆsino qr¸ma).

• Topojet sei : Antjete (kìkkino qr¸ma), Oudètere (prˆsino qr¸ma)


kai Jetikè (mple qr¸ma).

• Summaqe dr¸ntwn.

• Onìmata dr¸ntwn.

Gia na pˆroume ton pl rh arijmì twn sunistws¸n (anˆloga tou megèjou ),
ekteloÔme:

R> table(component.dist(ipn)$csize)

me apotèlesma:
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 69

289
1

'Etsi, blèpoume ìti upˆrqei mia mìno megˆlh sunist¸sa me 289 dr¸nte . 'Ara,
den upˆrqoun memonwmènoi dr¸nte .

A doÔme ìmw mia anaparˆstash tou diktÔou ma :


R> plot(ipn)

Sq ma 4.1: To dktuo IPRED.

Skìpimo ja  tan se autì to shmeo na doÔme to dktuo qrwmatismèno analìgw


twn qarakthristik¸n tou tÔpou twn dr¸ntwn kai twn topojet se¸n tou . Oi
antstoiqe entolè enai:

R> plot(ipn,vertex.col="IPRED_Actor_Types"))

kai
R> plot(ipn,vertex.col=""IPRED_Positions""))
Ta sq mata, pou prokÔptoun, fanontai sthn epìmenh selda.

Gia na pˆroume thn katanom  twn bajm¸n, ekteloÔme:

R> ipn.degreedist<-table(degree(ipn,cmode="indegree"))
R> ipn.degreedist
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 70

Sq ma 4.2: To dktuo IPRED qrwmatismèno anˆloga me to qarakthristikì


tou tÔpou twn dr¸ntwn.

Sq ma 4.3: To dktuo IPRED qrwmatismèno anˆloga me to qarakthristikì


twn topojet sewn twn dr¸ntwn.
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 71

me apotelèsmata:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 14 15
216 30 5 7 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 2 1
16 18 41 44 59 61 72
1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Gia thn arjmhsh akm¸n kai trig¸nwn:

R> summary(ipn~edges+triangle)

parnoume:

edges triangle
424 197

Kˆti idiaitèrw shmantikì apoteloÔn oi pnake sundèsewn (mixing matrices)


metaxÔ dr¸ntwn sta dÔo qarakthristikˆ (tÔpoi kai topojet sei ):

R> mixingmatrix(ipn,"IPRED_Actor_Types")

Note: Marginal totals can be misleading


for undirected mixing matrices.
Firm Indiv MEP-Party Orgs
Firm 23 2 1 149
Indiv 2 0 0 1
MEP-Party 1 0 9 33
Orgs 149 1 33 206

R> mixingmatrix(ipn,"IPRED_Positions")

Note: Marginal totals can be misleading


for undirected mixing matrices.
Note: Marginal totals can be misleading
for undirected mixing matrices.
Contra Neutral Pro
Contra 139 32 32
Neutral 32 16 54
Pro 32 54 151

Sth sunèqeia, ja kˆnoume akrib¸ thn dia melèth kai gia to dktuo SWPAT.

Arqikˆ h metonomasa:

R> swn <- SWPAT_Network


4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 72

Metˆ h perigraf  tou diktÔou:

R> summary(swn)

Network attributes:
vertices: 691
directed:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
hyper:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
loops:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
multiple:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
bipartite:
Mode FALSE
logical 1
total edges= 1004
density = 0.004211498
Vertex attributes:
vertex.names:
Length Class Mode
691 character character
SWPAT_Actor_Coalitions:
ALDE BSA COM EconomicMajorityCom
1 53 1 98
EDRi EICTA EICTA-SMEs
1 91 53
EPP-ED Eurolinux FFII Greens-EFA
1 286 1 1
GUE-NGL Independent MEP
1 1 1
Other-Unknown PatentFreiDe PSE UEN
84 15 1 1
SWPAT_Actor_Types:
Firm Indiv MEP-Party Orgs
533 9 8 141
SWPAT_Positions:
Contra Neutral Pro
407 70 214
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 73

Pˆli èqoume ta dia qarakthristikˆ sto dktuo SWPAT me to dktuo IPRED.


Gia to pl jo sunistws¸n (anˆloga megèjou ):

R> table(component.dist(swn)$csize)

parnoume:

691
1

Pˆli upˆrqei mia megˆlh sunist¸sa me 691 dr¸nte kai kajìlou memonwmènoi
dr¸nte .

H anaparˆstash tou diktÔou fanetai sto parakˆtw sq ma:

R> plot(swn)

Sq ma 4.4: To dktuo SWPAT.

Sth sunèqeia, sthn epìmenh selda, ja doÔme to dktuo qrwmatismèno anˆloga


me ta qarakthristikˆ tou tÔpou kai twn topojet sewn twn dr¸ntwn. Oi
entolè enai:

R> plot(SWPAT,vertex.col="swn_Actor_Types"))
R> plot(SWPAT,vertex.col="swn_Positions"))
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 74

Sq ma 4.5: To dktuo SWPAT qrwmatismèno anˆloga me to qarakthristikì


tou tÔpou twn dr¸ntwn.

Sq ma 4.6: To dktuo SWPAT qrwmatismèno anˆloga me to qarakthristikì


twn topojet sewn twn dr¸ntwn.
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 75

Gia thn katanom  twn bajm¸n:

R> swn.degreedist<-table(degree(SWPAT,cmode="indegree")) R>


swn.degreedist

parnoume:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15
588 26 7 6 7 1 10 5 10 6 3 3 2 2

16 17 20 21 23 24 29 34 40 74 100 160 293


1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

H arjmhsh akm¸n kai trig¸nwn:

R> summary(swn~edges+triangle)

dnei:

edges triangle
1004 723

Gia tou pnake sundèsewn metaxÔ qarakthristik¸n (mixing matrices), par-


noume:

R> mixingmatrix(swn,"SWPAT_Actor_Types")

Note: Marginal totals can be misleading


for undirected mixing matrices.
Firm Indiv MEP-Party Orgs
Firm 49 13 23 612
Indiv 13 2 10 31
MEP-Party 23 10 12 51
Orgs 612 31 51 201

kai

R> mixingmatrix(swn,"SWPAT_Positions")

Note: Marginal totals can be misleading


for undirected mixing matrices.
Contra Neutral Pro
Contra 470 90 15
Neutral 90 48 74
Pro 15 74 307
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 76

4.2 Prosarmog  Montèlwn Ekjetik¸n Tuqawn


Grafhmˆtwn

H arqik  prosarmog , pou ja pragmatopoi soume, ja enai kai h aploÔsterh


dunat , dedomènou ìti se aut n den endiaferìmaste gia kanèna apì ta qarakth-
ristikˆ, allˆ mìno gia ti akmè :

R> model1 <- ergm(ipn~edges)


R> summary(model1)

==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================

Formula: ipn ~ edges

Newton-Raphson iterations: 7

Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -4.57627 0.04881 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1

Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.

Null Pseudo-deviance: 57692 on 41616 degrees of freedom


Residual Pseudo-deviance: 4733 on 41615 degrees of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 52959 on 1 degrees of freedom
AIC: 4735 BIC: 4743.7

To pio shmantikì sthn prosarmog  aut  enai o upologismì th pijanìthta


Ôparxh mia sÔndesh . H pijanìthta aut  exˆgetai apì to log-odds twn
akm¸n mèsw tou tÔpou:

exp(log−odds)
P = .
(1 + exp(log−odds))

T¸ra èqoume ìti log−odds = −4.57627 me antstoiqh pijanìthta:

R> exp(-4.57627)/(1+exp(-4.57627))
[1] 0.01018835
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 77

Autì pou gnwrzoume kai perimènoume na isqÔei enai ìti, epeid  douleÔoume
me montèlo akm¸n, h pijanìthta Ôparxh mia akm  ja enai sqedìn sh me
thn puknìthta tou diktÔou, gegonì to opoo epalhjeÔetai, ìpw mporoÔme na
doÔme me thn entol  summary(ipn), apì thn opoa parnoume thn puknìthta
sh me 0.01018839.

H prosarmog  tou montèlou gia ta qarakthristikˆ tÔpou kai topojet sewn


dr¸ntwn:

R> model2 <- ergm(ipn~edges+nodematch("IPRED_Actor_Types")+


R+ nodematch("IPRED_Positions"))
R> summary(model2)

dnei:

==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================

Formula: ipn ~ edges + nodematch("IPRED_Actor_Types") +


nodematch("IPRED_Positions")

Newton-Raphson iterations: 7

Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -5.5291 0.1071 NA < 1e-04
*** nodematch.IPRED_actor_types 0.2967 0.0986 NA
0.00263 ** nodematch.IPRED_Positions 1.4363 0.1088 NA <
1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1

Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.

Null Pseudo-deviance: 57692.0 on 41616 degrees of freedom


Residual Pseudo-deviance: 4523.0 on 41613 degrees of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 53169.0 on 3 degrees of freedom

AIC: 4529.0 BIC: 4555

A doÔme t¸ra ti gnetai me thn pijanìthta Ôparxh akm¸n anˆmesa se dr¸n-


te , oi opooi èqoun ta dia   diaforetikˆ qarakthristikˆ. Gia to skopì autì
ekteloÔme thn entol :
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 78

R> model2$coef
edges nodematch.IPRED_Actor_Types nodematch.IPRED_Positions
-5.5290993 0.2966679 1.4363335

Ja qrhsimopoi soume tou ex  sumbolismoÔ :

• Me θ sumbolzoume to log-odds twn pl rw eterogen¸n (eterìfilwn)


akm¸n/sundèsewn (tìso w pro ton tÔpo, ìso kai ti topojet sei
twn dr¸ntwn).

• Me θ1 = θ + ζ sumbolzoume to log-odds twn merik¸ omoiogen¸n (o-


moiofilik¸n) akm¸n/sundèsewn mìno w pro ton tÔpo twn dr¸ntwn.

• Me θ2 = θ+η sumbolzoume to log-odds twn merik¸ omoiogen¸n (omoio-


filik¸n) akm¸n/sundèsewn mìno w pro ti topojet sei twn dr¸ntwn.

• Me θ3 = θ + ζ + η sumbolzoume to log-odds twn pl rw omoiogen¸n


(omoiofilik¸n) akm¸n/sundèsewn (tìso w pro ton tÔpo, ìso kai ti
topojet sei twn dr¸ntwn).

'Etsi, parnoume ti ex  antstoiqe pijanìthte :

• P (θ) = 0.003953868,

• P (θ1 ) = 0.005312155,

• P (θ2 ) = 0.01641892,

• P (θ3 ) = 0.02196494.

Autì pou parathroÔme, sÔmfwna me ti prosarmogè pou pragmatopoi same,


sth dunamik  tou diktÔou IPRED, to pio pijanì apotèlesma enai h pl rh
omoiofila kai to ligìtero pijanì h pl rh eterofila.

Sth sunèqeia, kˆnoume thn dia akrib¸ melèth kai gia to dktuo SWPAT.
PragmatopoioÔme thn arqik  prosarmog  se èna montèlo akm¸n:

R> model1 <- ergm(swn~edges) R> summary(model1)

==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================

Formula: swn ~ edges

Newton-Raphson iterations: 8
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 79

Pseudolikelihood Results:
Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value
edges -5.46572 0.03163 NA <1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1

Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.

Null Pseudo-deviance: 330486 on 238395 degrees of freedom


Residual Pseudo-deviance: 12987 on 238394 degrees of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 317498 on 1 degrees of freedom

AIC: 12989 BIC: 13000

Sto dktuo autì èqoume ìti log−odds = −5.46572 kai antstoiqh pijanìthta:

R> exp(-5.46572 )/(1+exp(-5.46572 ))


[1] 0.004211483

Pˆli perimènoume h pijanìthta Ôparxh mia akm  na enai sqedìn sh me thn
puknìthta tou diktÔou, gegonì to opoo epalhjeÔetai, ìpw mporoÔme na
doÔme me thn entol  summary(swn), apì thn opoa parnoume thn puknìthta
sh me 0.004211498.

H prosarmog  tou montèlou gia ta qarakthristikˆ tÔpou kai topojet sewn


twn dr¸ntwn:

R> model2 <- ergm(swn~edges+nodematch("SWPAT_Actor_Types")+


R+ nodematch("SWPAT_Positions"))
R> summary(model2)

dnei:

==========================
Summary of model fit
==========================

Formula: swn ~ edges + nodematch("SWPAT_Actor_Types") +


nodematch("SWPAT_Positions")

Newton-Raphson iterations: 8

Pseudolikelihood Results:
4 TA DŸ
IKTUA IPRED KAI SWPAT 80

Estimate Std. Error MCMC s.e. p-value


edges -5.93875 0.07571 NA <1e-04
*** nodematch.SWPAT_Actor_Types -1.91587 0.07238 NA
<1e-04 *** nodematch.SWPAT_Positions 2.04967 0.08318 NA
<1e-04 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘‘***’’ 0.001 ‘‘**’’ 0.01 ‘‘*’’ 0.05 ‘‘.’’ 0.1 ‘‘ ’’ 1

Warning:
The standard errors are based on naive pseudolikelihood and are suspect.

Null Pseudo-deviance: 330486 on 238395 degrees of freedom


Residual Pseudo-deviance: 11576 on 238392 degrees of freedom
Pseudo-deviance: 318910 on 3 degrees of freedom

AIC: 11582 BIC: 11613

A doÔme t¸ra ti gnetai me thn pijanìthta Ôparxh akm¸n anˆmesa se dr¸n-


te , oi opooi èqoun ta dia   diaforetikˆ qarakthristikˆ. Gia to skopì autì
ekteloÔme thn entol :

R> model2$coef

edges nodematch.SWPAT_Actor_Types nodematch.SWPAT_Positions


-5.938753 -1.915869 2.049667

Qrhsimopoi¸nta tou diou sumbolismoÔ , prokÔptoun oi ex  pijanìthte :

• P (θ) = 0.002628387,

• P (θ1 ) = 0.0003878042,

• P (θ2 ) = 0.02005366,

• P (θ3 ) = 0.003003542.

Autì pou parathroÔme, sÔmfwna me ti prosarmogè pou pragmatopoi same,


sth dunamik  tou diktÔou SWPAT, to pio pijanì apotèlesma enai h merik 
omoiofila w pro ti topojet sei twn dr¸ntwn kai to ligìtero pijanì h
merik  omoiofila w pro ton tÔpo twn dr¸ntwn.
5 PARŸ
ARTHMA 81

5 Parˆrthma
5.1 To Peribˆllon R
5.1.1 Genik  Parousash

Sto parˆrthma autì ja kˆnoume mia polÔ sÔntomh parousash tou peribˆllon-
to R, to opoo apotele èna oloklhrwmèno pakèto eleÔjerou logismikoÔ, pou
qrhsimopoietai gia th diaqerish dedomènwn, upologismoÔ , grafikè anapa-
rastˆsei kai gia statistikè analÔsei (Venables & Smith, 2008 [42]). To
peribˆllon R diatjetai eleÔjera apì ton istìtopo http://cran.r.org/.

'Otan qrhsimopoioÔme to R se peribˆllon Windows prn apì ton stajerì kèr-


sora upˆrqei èna sÔmbolo th morf  >, en¸ se peribˆllon UNIX, to opoo
ed¸ qrhsimopoioÔme, èna sÔmbolo th morf  $.

A doÔme t¸ra poia enai h akoloujoÔmenh diadikasa ènarxh tou R tìso se


peribˆllon Windows ìso kai se peribˆllon UNIX .

Sto men UNIX, arqikˆ ftiˆqnoume èna xeqwristì sub-directory, èstw to


work, sto opoo ja apojhkeÔoume ta arqea dedomènwn, pou ja prokÔptoun  
ja qrhsimopoihjoÔn sto R gia th sugkekrimènh anˆlush pou kˆnoume. Autì
ja enai kai to working directory ma gia th sugkekrimènh anˆlush. Oi
kÔrie entolè ènarxh enai oi ex  :

$ mkdir work
$ cd work

Sth sunèqeia, xekinˆme to prìgramma R me thn entol :

$ R

kai metˆ qrhsimopoioÔme ti opoiesd pote entolè qreiˆzontai. Tèlo , klenou-


me to prìgramma me thn entol 

$ q()

Mìli ektelèsoume thn entol  kleismato , ja erwthjoÔme an jèloume na a-


pojhkeÔsoume ìti èqei prokÔyei katˆ thn diˆrkeia th ergasa ma sto R. Se
merikˆ sust mata ja prokÔyei èna plasio dialìgou, en¸ se kˆpoia ˆlla èna
text prompt, ìpou ja klhjoÔme na apant soume nai, ìqi   akÔrwsh. Pro-
soq  qreiˆzetai sto gegonì ìti s¸zetai sthn ousa h douleiˆ ma kai ìqi oi
entolè san epexergˆsimo kai ˆmesa diajèsimo kemeno. Dhlad , an jèloume
na kˆnoume kˆpoie tropopoi sei sto arqeo autì kajautì, aplˆ de mporoÔ-
me. H mình lÔsh enai na s¸soume thn douleiˆ ma san text arqeo, opìte
kai ja mporoÔme na epembanoume anˆ pˆsa ¸ra kai stigm . Aplˆ me autìn
5 PARŸ
ARTHMA 82

ton trìpo, ja qreiaste èna   kˆpoia parapˆnw enter gia na epanekteleste


ìlh h ergasa ma ìtan ja xanafort¸noume ti entolè ma . Tèlo , an apojh-
keute h douleiˆ ma san text arqeo, skìpimo enai na qrhsimopoi soume to
UTF8 format, alli¸ oi entolè se kˆpoia epanektèlesh ja fortwjoÔn san
akatalabstikoi ASCII qarakt re .

Se peribˆllon Windows, h diadikasa enai basikˆ h dia. Kat' arq n, dhmiour-


goÔme èna fˆkelo, o opoo ja apotele to working directory ma . Sth
sunèqeia, kˆnoume diplì klk sto eikondio tou R, gia na xekin sei to prì-
gramma kai allˆzoume to default working directory me autì pou èqoume
ftiˆxei w ex  : kˆnoume monì klk sto File, metˆ monì klk sto change
directory kai eisagˆgoume to monopˆti (path), pou odhge sto working
directory, pou èqoume ftiˆxei. H eisagwg  tou monopatioÔ gnetai grapt¸
  me qr sh tou browse.

W pro to trto b ma (qrhsimopohsh twn entol¸n pou ja ma qreiastoÔn),


upˆrqei mia enswmatwmènh leitourga sto R parìmoia me thn man sto peribˆl-
lon UNIX. Gia na lˆboume perissìtere plhrofore gia opoiad pote entol ,
paradegmato qˆrh, th solve, h ekteloÔmenh entol  enai h parakˆtw:

$ help(solve)

$ ?solve

Apì teqnik  ˆpoyh , to R enai mia gl¸ssa me idiatera aplì suntaktikì.


Enai case sensitive, ìpw ta perissìtera pakèta, pou enai basismèna sto
UNIX. Autì shmanei ìti ta A kai a enai diaforetikˆ sÔmbola kai profan¸
antistoiqoÔn se diaforetikè metablhtè . To sÔnolo twn sumbìlwn, pou mpo-
roÔn na qrhsimopoihjoÔn sto R, exartˆtai ˆmesa apì to leitourgikì sÔsthma.
Kanonikˆ, ìla ta alfarijmhtikˆ sÔmbola epitrèpontai sun th telea kai th
kˆtw paÔla , me ton periorismì ìti èna ìnoma prèpei na xekinˆei me telea  
grˆmma kai, an xekinˆei me telea, o deÔtero qarakt ra de mpore na enai
arijmì . Oi entolè diaqwrzontai metaxÔ tou me ellhnikì erwthmatikì. E-
piplèon, oi aplè entolè mporoÔn na omadopoihjoÔn mèsa se ˆgkistra.

Ta sqìlia xekinoÔn me ♯ kai ektenontai katˆ m ko ekenh th gramm  . A-


kìmh, an mia entol  den enai pl rh mèqri to tèlo th gramm  , tìte to
sÔmbolo >   $ allˆzei kai gnetai + sthn epìmenh gramm .

Se pollè ekdìsei tou, tìso se peribˆllon UNIX ìso kai Windows, to R pa-
rèqei ènan mhqanismì anˆklhsh kai epanektèlesh prohgoÔmenwn entol¸n.
Autì gnetai me to pl ktro tou pˆnw bèlou .
5 PARŸ
ARTHMA 83

An oi pro ektèlesh entolè enai apojhkeumène se èna exwterikì arqeo,


èstw to Commands.R sto working directory work, tìte autè mporoÔn na
ektelestoÔn opoiad pote stigm  me thn entol :

$ source ("Commands.R")

5.1.2 Pakèta

'Ole oi sunart sei tou R, kaj¸ kai ta sÔnola twn dedomènwn, enai apojhk-
eumèna se pakèta (packages). Mìno ìtan fort¸noume èna pakèto, ta peri-
eqìmenˆ tou enai diajèsima. To R prosfèrei th dunatìthta se proqwrhmènou
epipèdou qr ste na dhmiourg soun ta dikˆ tou pakèta, kˆti pou profan¸
fanetai na enai idiatera eÔqrhsto. Epeid  ìmw sto parˆrthma autì kˆnou-
me apl¸ mia eisagwg  sto R, de ja anaferjoÔme sto exeidikeumèno autì jèma.

Gia na doÔme t¸ra poia pakèta enai diajèsima, ekteloÔme thn entol :

$ library(),

qwr kˆpoio ìrisma mèsa sti parenjèsei . Gia na fort¸soume èna sugkekri-
mèno pakèto, p.q., to boot, ekteloÔme thn entol :

$ library(boot)

Oi qr ste , pou enai sunedemènoi sto diadktuo, mporoÔn na qrhsimopoi soun


ti entolè install.packages() kai update.packages() me to ìnoma tou
pakètou mèsa sti parenjèsei . Profan¸ , h pr¸th entol  egkajistˆ kˆpoio
pakèto th areskea ma , en¸ h deÔterh enhmer¸nei kˆpoio pakèto, to opoo
enai  dh egkatesthmèno sto R. Gia na doÔme mia lsta me diajèsime bohjhtikè
odhge gia èna pakèto, ekteloÔme thn entol :

$ help.start(),

me to ìnoma tou pakètou na topojetetai mèsa sti parenjèsei .

Ta basikˆ pakèta jewroÔntai mèro tou phgaou k¸dika tou R. Perièqoun ti


basikè leitourge , pou epitrèpoun sto R na douleÔei, kaj¸ epsh kai ta
sÔnola dedomènwn, ti tupikè statistikè kai ti grafikè leitourge gia thn
anaparˆstash twn dedomènwn kai twn apotelesmˆtwn.

5.1.3 DianÔsmata

To R leitourge me onomatismène domè dedomènwn. H pio apl  dom , allˆ kai


h perissìtero qrhsimopoioÔmenh, enai to arijmhtikì diˆnusma, pou apotele-
tai apì èna diatetagmèno sÔnolo arijm¸n. 'Estw x loipìn èna diˆnusma, pou
apoteletai apì pènte arijmoÔ , tou 10.4, 5.6, 3.1, 6.4 kai 21.7. Tìte autì
mpore na oriste sto R me tou parakˆtw dÔo trìpou :
5 PARŸ
ARTHMA 84

$ x <- c(10.4, 5.6, 3.1, 6.4, 21.7)

$ assign("x", c(10.4, 5.6, 3.1, 6.4, 21.7))

'Opw kai stou pragmatikoÔ arijmoÔ , ètsi kai sta dianÔsmata, oi stoiqei-
¸dei arijmhtiko telestè enai oi + , - , * , / kai ˆ.

Sti perissìtere peript¸sei , o qr sth den endiafèretai gia to eˆn oi arij-


mo se èna diˆnusma enai akèraioi, pragmatiko   kai akìmh migadiko. 'Etsi,
h tetragwnik  rza tou -17

sqrt(-17)

ja epistrèyei Nan kai kˆpoia eidopohsh, allˆ to

sqrt(-17 + 0i)

ja kˆnei tou upologismoÔ me migadikoÔ arijmoÔ .

To R parèqei epsh thn dunatìthta dhmiourga apl¸n akolouji¸n. Para-


degmato qˆrh, h entol  1:30 enai to diˆnusma c = (1, 2, 3, . . . , 29, 30). H
entol  30:1 mpore na qrhsimopoihje gia na ftiˆxoume thn akolouja pro ta
psw (w fjnousa). 'Ena pio oloklhrwmèno kai genikì trìpo jewretai
h qrhsimopohsh th sunˆrthsh seq(). Aut  parnei dÔo orsmata, pou dia-
qwrzontai me kìmma, me to pr¸to na apotele thn arq  th akolouja kai
to deÔtero to tèlo th . To b ma jewretai stajerì kai so me th monˆda
se autoÔ tou trìpou paragwg  akolouji¸n. Me thn teleutaa entol 
upˆrqei ìmw mia mikr  diaforopohsh. Oi entolè seq(1, 30), seq(from
= 1, to = 30) kai seq(from = 30, to = 1) enai ìle die kai se kai
dhmiourgoÔn thn akolouja 1:30. Epomènw , sthn pragmatikìthta, me thn en-
tol  seq() orzetai kai to b ma. 'Etsi, p.q., eˆn jèloume thn akolouja −5,
−4.8, ...,4.8, 5, pou xekinˆei apì ton arijmì -5 kai katal gei ston arijmì 5,
me b ma 0.2, h ekteloÔmenh entol  enai h:

$ seq(-5, 5, by=.2)

Ektì apì ta arijmhtikˆ, to R qeirzetai kai ta logikˆ dianÔsmata. Ta stoi-


qea enì logikoÔ dianÔsmato mporoÔn na pˆroun ti timè TRUE (alhj  ),
FALSE (yeud  ) kai NA (ˆgnwsth).

Ta logikˆ dianÔsmata dhmiourgoÔntai kˆtw apì sugkekrimène sunj ke . P.q.,


h entol  temp <- x > 13 dhmiourge to diˆnusma temp, pou parnei thn tim 
5 PARŸ
ARTHMA 85

TRUE, ìtan to x enai megalÔtero tou 13 kai thn tim  FALSE, ìtan to x enai
mikrìtero tou 13.

Oi qrhsimopoioÔmenoi logiko telestè enai oi <, ≤, >, ≥, == gia akrib 


isìthta kai ! = gia anisìthta. Epiplèon, an ta c1 kai c2 apoteloÔn logikè
ekfrˆsei , tìte to c1 & c2 enai h tom  (to logikì kai) kai to c1 | c2 enai
h ènwsh (to logikì  ). Akìmh an jèloume thn ˆrnhsh tou c1 tìte h entol 
enai h !c1.
BIBLIOGRAFŸ
IA 86

Bibliografa
[1℄ Anderson, C.J., Wasserman, S., & Crouch, B. (1999). A p∗ primer: logit
models for social networks. Social Networks, 21, 37-66.

[2] Besag, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of latti-
ce systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, 96-127.

[3] Besag, J.E. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. The Stati-
stician, 24, 179-195.

[4] Boudourides, M., & Haunss, S. (2008). A social network analysis of two
European intellectual property conflicts. Paper presended at the 2008
ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Rennes, 11-16 April 2008.

[5] Erdös, P., & Rényi, A. (1959). On random graphs. I. Publicationes


Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6, 290-297.

[6] Feld, S. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Jour-
nal of Sociology, 86, 1015-1035.

[7] Frank, O., & Nowicki, K. (1993). Exploratory statistical analysis of


networks. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 55, 349-366.

[8] Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the Ame-
rican Statistical Association, 81, 832-842.

[9] Goodreau, S.M., Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., & Butts, C.T. (2006).
Statnet Tutorial, Sunbelt XXVI, Vancouver BC, 26 April 2006.

[10] Goodreau, S.M., Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., Butts, C.T., & Morris,
M. (2008). A Statnet Tutorial. Journal of Statistical Software, 24, 1-26.

[11] Handcock, M.S. (2003). Statistical models for social networks: dege-
neracy and inference. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.),
Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis. Washington, DC: Na-
tional Academies Press, pp. 229-240.

[12] Handcock, M., Hunter, D., Butts, C., Goodreau, S., & Morris, M.
(2006). Statnet: An R Package for the Statistical Analysis and Simu-
lation of Social Networks. Manual. University of Washington. URL:
http://www.csde.washington.edu/statnet.

[13] Holland, P.W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of pro-


bability distributions for directed graphs (with discussion). Journal of
the American Statistical Association, 76, 33-65.
BIBLIOGRAFŸ
IA 87

[14] Hunter, D., & Handcock, M. (2006). Inference in curved exponential


family models for networks. Journal of Computational and Graphical
Statistics, 15, 565-583.
[15] Hunter, D. (2007). Curved exponential family models for social netw-
orks. Social Networks, 29, 216-230.
[16] Hunter, D., Handcock, M., Butts, C., Goodreau, S., & Morris, M.
(2008b). “ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-
Family Models for Networks.” Journal of Statistical Software, 24(3).
URL: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v24/i03/.
[17] Lazega, E., & van Duijn, M. (1997). Position in formal structure, per-
sonal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: a logistic
regression model for dyadic network data. Social Networks, 19, 375-
397.
[18] Liu, C.L. (2001). Stoiqea Diakrit¸n Majhmatik¸n . Panepisthmiakè
Ekdìsei Kr th , Hrˆkleio.
[19] Moreno, J.L., & Jennings, H.H. (1938). Statistics of social configura-
tions. Sociometry, 1, 342-374.
[20] Morris M., Handcock M.S., & Hunter D.R. (2008). Specification
of Exponential-Family Random Graph Models: Terms and Com-
putational Aspects. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(4). URL:
http://www.jstatsoft.org/v24/i04/.
[21] Newman, M. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks.
SIAM Review, 45, 167-256.
[22] Padgett, J.F. (1994). Marriage and elite structure in Renaissance Flo-
rence, 1282-1500. Paper prepared for delivery to the Social Science Hi-
story Association, Atlanta, Georgia, 14 October 1994.
[23] Pattison, P.E., & Robins, G.L. (2002). Neighbourhood-based models
for social networks. Sociological Methodology, 32, 301-337.
[24] Pattison, P.E., & Robins, G.L. (2004). Building models for social space:
neighborhood based models for social networks and affiliation structu-
res. Mathematiques des Science Humaines, 168, 11-29.
[25] Pattison, P.E., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic re-
gressions for social networks. II. Multivariate relations. British Journal
of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 169-194.
[26] Pattison, P., & Robins, G. (2008). Probabilistic network theory. In
T. Rudas (Ed.), Handbook of Probability: Theory and Applications.
London: Sage Publications.
BIBLIOGRAFŸ
IA 88

[27] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Woolcock, J. (2004). Models for social
networks with missing data. Social Networks, 26, 257-283.

[28] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Woolcock, J. (2005). Social networks
and small worlds. American Journal of Sociology 110, 894-936.

[29] Robins, G.L., & Pattison, P.E. (2005). Interdependencies and social
processes: generalized dependence structures. In: P. Carrington, J.
Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and Methods in Social Netw-
ork Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192-214.

[30] Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007a). An Introdu-
ction to Exponential Random Graph (p∗ ) Models for Social Networks.
Social Networks, 29, 173-191.

[31] Robins, G., Snijders, T., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P.
(2007b). Recent Developments in Exponential Random Graph (p∗ ) Mo-
dels for Social Networks. Social Networks, 29, 192-215.

[32] Robins, G.L., Elliott, P., & Pattison, P.E. (2001a). Network models for
social selection processes. Social Networks, 23, 1-30.

[33] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Elliott, P. (2001b). Network models for
social influence processes. Psychometrika, 66, 161-190.

[34] Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models
and logistic regressions for social networks. III. Valued relations. Ps-
ychometrika, 64, 371-394.

[35] Schweinberger, M., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2003). Settings in social netw-
orks: a measurement model. Sociological Methodology, 33, 307-341.

[36] Skvoretz, J., & Faust, K. (1999). Logit models for affiliation networks.
Sociological Methodology, 29, 253-280.

[37] Snijders, T.A.B. (2002). Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of ex-
ponential random graph models. Journal of Social Structure, 3, 2.

[38] Snijders, T.A.B., Pattison, P., Robins, G.L., & Handcock, M. (2006).
New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological
Methodology, 36, 99-153.

[39] Strauss, D. (1986). On a general class of models for interaction. SIAM


Review, 28, 513-527.

[40] Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudo-likelihood estimation for social
networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 204-212.
BIBLIOGRAFŸ
IA 89

[41] Van Duijn, M.A.J., Snijders, T.A.B., & Zijlstra, B.J.H. (2004). p2 : A
random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Statistica Ne-
erlandica, 58, 234-254.

[42] Venables, W. N., Smith, D.M., & the R Development Core Team (2008).
An Introduction to R, Version 2.6.2.

[43] Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P.E. (1996). Logit models and logistic re-
gressions for social networks. I. An introduction to Markov graphs and
p∗. Psychometrika, 61, 401-425.

[44] Wasserman, S., & Robins, G.L. (2005). An introduction to random


graphs, dependence graphs, and p∗ . In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S.
Wasserman (Eds.), Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis.
New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 148-161.

You might also like