I strongly agree with the recommendation that is stated, because it will eliminate

chaos among the student coming from different academic backgrounds when they appear
on college admission tests. If the curriculum is not the same, then they will have
different intellectual, educational competencies when entering college, the one
with a superior curriculum will find it easy to get admission to their preferred
college and the one with an average curriculum will face difficulties while
clearing entry test for college. Besides this having the same national curriculum
will build a sense of unity among students and they can help each other
academically in a better way. The competition environment will be healthy and every
student will have an equal chance to clear the exam. It will only not useful in the
case if the national curriculum is very outdated, or the content compiled for just
average students if they updated regularly it and the content of the curriculum
compiled keeping in view many students. In Pakistan, the national curriculum is not
the same and 3 types of curriculum thought, the one compiled for students having an
elite background, the one that is purely religious, and then the one that is for
the public or for students having the average or poor economic background, this
resulted in uneven distribution of jobs and resources among students. The one
having elite academic background easily got the ruling job positions and plan
policies that only support rich, the one from average curriculum background mostly
work under elite class and have no chances to get elite positions then the third
curricular students only find their job in madrasas and in the religious role and
practically can't take part in formulating policies for the development of the
country, in this way many talents wasted that should shape future of country. so
keeping in view all these circumstances, I strongly agree for a country to have the
same national curriculum.