You are on page 1of 1

“Article Analysis”

Upon analysis the competent publish-article highlights different situations to


showcase globalization has definitely altered the role of every state specifically.
First politically, the enlightenment of each state is often dependent on another
state or in more states; due few undeveloped-state need the
supreme-power-assistance of a well-developed-state. Second socially, the
eye-opener state’s role transition from a suppose controller to a unsupposed
protector, the unsatisfied terrorism network system who wants to rule over a state,
moreover the resolvement given of interstates to prevent AIDs epidemic. Third
technologically, the breathtaking truth media made every state as whole;
consequently being aware as one whenever new updates came elsewhere, the
internet advancement-beneficial that results state’s incontrolable
information-distribution & many more. Fourth economically, the sudden-truth
global economy circumstance wherein few well-developed-state overpower
undeveloped-state.

As a thorough-interpreter there were no scenarios given fit-in to biased


explanations. Every situational-explanation provides enough coverage of
information to prove globalization has altered the role of the state. And yeah! I
agree with this article. For the reason it is not undeniable these facts exist in reality.
Even though few facts were tough to accept. That state’s inappropriate transition
from once a controlling-role to a protecting-role; simultaneously from once a
reliable authoritative to a dependent-figure between the supreme-power-state to
present not-seems-removable interdependence is TRUE. However I believe in what
Charles Darwin says, “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the
most intelligent, but rather the one most responsive to change”.

You might also like