Upon analysis the competent publish-article highlights different situations to
showcase globalization has definitely altered the role of every state specifically. First politically, the enlightenment of each state is often dependent on another state or in more states; due few undeveloped-state need the supreme-power-assistance of a well-developed-state. Second socially, the eye-opener state’s role transition from a suppose controller to a unsupposed protector, the unsatisfied terrorism network system who wants to rule over a state, moreover the resolvement given of interstates to prevent AIDs epidemic. Third technologically, the breathtaking truth media made every state as whole; consequently being aware as one whenever new updates came elsewhere, the internet advancement-beneficial that results state’s incontrolable information-distribution & many more. Fourth economically, the sudden-truth global economy circumstance wherein few well-developed-state overpower undeveloped-state.
As a thorough-interpreter there were no scenarios given fit-in to biased
explanations. Every situational-explanation provides enough coverage of information to prove globalization has altered the role of the state. And yeah! I agree with this article. For the reason it is not undeniable these facts exist in reality. Even though few facts were tough to accept. That state’s inappropriate transition from once a controlling-role to a protecting-role; simultaneously from once a reliable authoritative to a dependent-figure between the supreme-power-state to present not-seems-removable interdependence is TRUE. However I believe in what Charles Darwin says, “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but rather the one most responsive to change”.