ÍÂÓÔÊˆÓ ˙ÔψٷÛ

ÏÔÁÔÈ ÍÂÓÔʈÓÙÔÛ
˙Ôψٷ

WWW.E-E-E.GR
 √ ÚÒËÓ Úˆı˘Ô˘ÚÁfi˜ Î·È Î·ıËÁËÙ‹˜ Î. •ÂÓÔÊÒÓ ∑ÔÏÒÙ·˜ ›¯Â
ÂÎʈӋÛÂÈ ‰‡Ô ÏfiÁÔ˘˜ ÛÙËÓ √˘¿ÛÈÁÎÙÔÓ (ÛÙȘ 26 ™ÂÙÂÌ‚Ú›Ô˘ 1957 Î·È ÛÙȘ 2
√ÎÙˆ‚Ú›Ô˘ 1959), ÔÈ ÔÔ›ÔÈ ¤ÌÂÈÓ·Ó ÌÓËÌÂÈÒ‰ÂȘ. ∞ÈÙ›· ˆ˜ ÚÔ˜ ·˘Ùfi ‰ÂÓ
‹Ù·Ó ÌfiÓÔ ÙÔ ÂÚȯfiÌÂÓfi ÙÔ˘˜ ·ÏÏ¿ Î·È Ë ÁÏÒÛÛ· ÙÔ˘˜. ÀÔÙ›ıÂÙ·È fiÙÈ Ë
ÁÏÒÛÛ· ÙˆÓ ÏfiÁˆÓ ‹Ù·Ó Ë ·ÁÁÏÈ΋. ∫·Ù' Ô˘Û›·Ó fï˜, Ì ÙËÓ ·Ê·›ÚÂÛË
Ï›ÁˆÓ Û˘Ó‰¤Û̈Ó, ¿ÚıÚˆÓ Î·È ÚÔı¤ÛÂˆÓ Ë ÁÏÒÛÛ· Â›Ó·È Ë ∂ÏÏËÓÈ΋. ∆Ô
·ÎÚÔ·Ù‹ÚÈfi ÙÔ˘ ·ÔÙÂÏÔ‡Û·Ó ÔÈ Û‡Ó‰ÚÔÈ Ù˘ ¢ÈÂıÓÔ‡˜ ∆Ú¿Â˙·˜
∞Ó·Û˘ÁÎÚfiÙËÛ˘ Î·È ∞Ó¿Ù˘Í˘ Î·È ‰ÂÓ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛ·Ó ÙfiÙ ηӤӷ
Úfi‚ÏËÌ· ÛÙËÓ Î·Ù·ÓfiËÛË ÙÔ‡ ÚÔÊÔÚÈÎÔ‡ ÎÂÈ̤ÓÔ˘ Ô˘ ·Ó¤ÁÓˆÛ Ô
ŒÏÏËÓ·˜ ηıËÁËÙ‹˜. ∂ΛÓÔ ÙÔÓ Î·ÈÚfi, ηÙ›¯Â ÙËÓ ı¤ÛË ÙÔ‡ ‰È¢ı˘ÓÙ‹
∆Ú·¤˙˘ ∂ÏÏ¿‰Ô˜ Î·È ‰È·¯ÂÈÚÈÛÙ‹ ÙÔ˘ ÂÏÏËÓÈÎÔ‡ ¢ËÌÔÛ›Ô˘ ÃÚ¤Ô˘˜.
∞ÎÔÏÔ˘ı› Ô ÏfiÁÔ˜ Ù˘ 26/9/1957:

"I always wished to address this Assembly in Greek, but realized

that it would have been indeed "Greek" to all present in this room. I
found out,however, that I could make my address in Greek which would
still be English to everybody. With your permission, Mr. Chairman, l shall
do it now, using with the exception of articles and prepositions, only
Greek words.

"Kyrie, I eulogize the archons of the Panethnic Numismatic Thesaurus

and the Ecumenical Trapeza for the orthodoxy of their axioms, methods
and policies, although there is an episode of cacophony of the Trapeza
with Hellas. With enthusiasm we dialogue and synagonize at the synods
of our didymous organizations in which polymorphous economic ideas
and dogmas are analyzed and synthesized. Our critical problems such as
the numismatic plethora generate some agony and melancholy. This
phenomenon is characteristic of our epoch. But, to my thesis, we have
the dynamism to program therapeutic practices as a prophylaxis from
chaos and catastrophe. In parallel, a Panethnic unhypocritical
economic synergy and harmonization in a democratic climate is basic. I
apologize for my eccentric monologue. I emphasize my euharistia to you,
Kyrie to the eugenic arid generous American Ethnos and to the
organizes and protagonists of his Amphictyony and the gastronomic
symposia".

1
 ¢‡Ô ¯ÚfiÓÈ· ·ÚÁfiÙÂÚ·, ÙÔ 1959, Ô •. ∑ÔÏÒÙ·˜ ¤‰ˆÛ ̛· ¿ÏÏË
ÂÏÏËÓÔ·ÁÁÏÈ΋ ÔÌÈÏ›·, ˙ËÙÒÓÙ·˜ Ó· ÙÔÓ ·ÎÔ‡ÛÔ˘Ó Ì ÚÔÛÔ¯‹, ·ÎfiÌ· ÎÈ
·Ó ˘‹Ú¯Â Ô Î›Ó‰˘ÓÔ˜ Ó· ÎÔ˘Ú¿ÛÂÈ ÙÔ˘˜ ·ÎÚÔ·Ù¤˜ ÙÔ˘. π‰Ô‡ Ô ÏfiÁÔ˜ Î·È Ë
ÂÏÏËÓÈ΋ ÙÔ˘ "ÌÂÙ·ÁÚ·Ê‹":

Kyrie,

It is Zeus' anathema on our epoch (for the dynamism of our

economies) and the heresy of our economic method and policies that we
should agonize the Skylla of nomismatic plethora and the Charybdis of
economic anaemia. It is not my idiosyncracy to be ironic or sarcastic
but my diagnosis would be that politicians are rather cryptoplethorists.
Although they emphatically stigmatize nomismatic plethora, they
energize it through their tactics and practices. Our policies should be
based more on economic and less on political criteria. Our gnomon has
to be a metron between economic,strategic and philanthropic scopes.
Political magic has always been anti-economic. In an epoch
characterized by monopolies, oligopolies, monopolistic antagonism and
polymorphous inelasticities, our policies have to be more orthological,
but this should not be metamorphosed into plethorophobia, which is
endemic among academic economists. Nomismatic symmetry should not
antagonize economic acme.
A greater harmonization between the practices of the economic
and nomismatic archons is basic. Parallel to this,we have to
synchronize and harmonize more and more our economic and
nomismatic policies panethnically. These scopes are more practicable
now, when the prognostics of the political and economic barometer
are halcyonic. The history of our didimus organization on this sphere
has been didactic and their gnostic practices will always be a tonic to
the polyonymous and idiomorphous ethnical economies. The genesis of
the programmed organization will dynamize these policies. Therefore, i
sympathize, although not without criticism one or two themes with the
apostles and the hierarchy of our organs in their zeal to program
orthodox economic and nomismatic policies, although I have some
logomachy with them.I apologize for having tyranized you with my
Hellenic phraseology. In my epilogue, i emphasize my eulogy to the
philoxenous aytochtons of this cosmopolitan metropolis and my
encomium to you, Kyrie stenographers.

2
 ∫‡ÚÈÔÈ,

∂›Ó·È "¢Èfi˜ ·Ó¿ıÂÌ·" ÛÙËÓ ÂÔ¯‹ Ì·˜ Î·È ·›ÚÂÛË Ù˘ ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈ΋˜ Ì·˜
ÌÂıfi‰Ô˘ Î·È Ù˘ ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈ΋˜ Ì·˜ ÔÏÈÙÈ΋˜ ÙÔ fiÙÈ ı· ʤÚÓ·Ì Û ·ÁˆÓ›·
ÙËÓ ™Î‡ÏÏ· ÙÔ˘ ÓÔÌÈÛÌ·ÙÈÎÔ‡ ÏËıˆÚÈÛÌÔ‡ Î·È ÙË Ã¿Ú˘‚‰Ë Ù˘ ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈ΋˜
Ì·˜ ·Ó·ÈÌ›·˜. ¢ÂÓ Â›Ó·È ÛÙËÓ È‰ÈÔÛ˘ÁÎÚ·Û›· ÌÔ˘ Ó· Â›Ì·È ÂÈÚˆÓÈÎfi˜ ‹
Û·ÚηÛÙÈÎfi˜ ·ÏÏ¿ Ë ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛ‹ ÌÔ˘ ı· ‹Ù·Ó fiÙÈ ÔÈ ÔÏÈÙÈÎÔ› Â›Ó·È Ì¿ÏÏÔÓ
ÎÚ˘ÙÔÏËıˆÚÈÛÙ¤˜. ∞Ó Î·È Ì ¤ÌÊ·ÛË ÛÙÈÁÌ·Ù›˙Ô˘Ó ÙÔÓ ÓÔÌÈÛÌ·ÙÈÎfi
ÏËıˆÚÈÛÌfi, ÙÔÓ ÂÓÂÚÁÔÔÈÔ‡Ó Ì¤Ûˆ Ù˘ Ù·ÎÙÈ΋˜ ÙÔ˘˜ Î·È ÙˆÓ Ú·ÎÙÈÎÒÓ
ÙÔ˘˜. ∏ ÔÏÈÙÈ΋ Ì·˜ ı· ¤ÚÂ ӷ ‚·Û›˙ÂÙ·È ÂÚÈÛÛfiÙÂÚÔ Û ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈο ηÈ
ÏÈÁfiÙÂÚÔ Û ÔÏÈÙÈο ÎÚÈÙ‹ÚÈ·. °ÓÒÌˆÓ Ì·˜ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· Â›Ó·È ¤Ó· ̤ÙÚÔ
ÌÂٷ͇ ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈ΋˜, ÛÙÚ·ÙËÁÈ΋˜ Î·È ÊÈÏ·ÓıÚˆÈ΋˜ ÛÎÔÈ¿˜. ™Â ÌÈ· ÂÔ¯‹
Ô˘ ¯·Ú·ÎÙËÚ›˙ÂÙ·È ·fi ÌÔÓÔÒÏÈ·, ÔÏÈÁÔÒÏÈ·, ÌÔÓÔˆÏÈ·Îfi ·ÓÙ·ÁˆÓÈÛÌfi
Î·È ÔχÌÔÚʘ ·ÓÂÏ·ÛÙÈÎfiÙËÙ˜, ÔÈ ÔÏÈÙÈΤ˜ Ì·˜ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· Â›Ó·È ÈÔ
ÔÚıÔÏÔÁÈÛÙÈΤ˜, ·ÏÏ¿ ·˘Ùfi ‰ÂÓ ı· ¤ÚÂ ӷ ÌÂÙ·ÌÔÚÊÒÓÂÙ·È ÛÂ
ÏËıˆÚÔÊÔ‚›·, Ë ÔÔ›· Â›Ó·È ÂÓ‰ËÌÈ΋ ÛÙÔ˘˜ ·Î·‰ËÌ·˚ÎÔ‡˜
ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÔÏfiÁÔ˘˜. ∏ ÓÔÌÈÛÌ·ÙÈ΋ Û˘ÌÌÂÙÚ›· ‰ÂÓ ı· ¤ÚÂ ӷ
·ÓÙ·ÁˆÓ›˙ÂÙ·È ÙËÓ ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈ΋ ·ÎÌ‹.
ªÈ· ÌÂÁ·Ï‡ÙÂÚË ÂÓ·ÚÌfiÓÈÛË ÌÂٷ͇ ÙˆÓ Ú·ÎÙÈÎÒÓ ÙˆÓ ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈÎÒÓ
Î·È ÓÔÌÈÛÌ·ÙÈÎÒÓ ·Ú¯fiÓÙˆÓ Â›Ó·È ‚·ÛÈ΋. ¶·Ú¿ÏÏËÏ· Ì ·˘Ùfi, Ú¤ÂÈ Ó·
ÂÎÛ˘Á¯ÚÔÓ›ÛÔ˘ÌÂ Î·È Ó· ÂÓ·ÚÌÔÓ›ÛÔ˘Ì fiÏÔ Î·È ÂÚÈÛÛfiÙÂÚÔ ÙȘ
ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈΤ˜ Î·È ÓÔÌÈÛÌ·ÙÈΤ˜ Ì·˜ Ú·ÎÙÈΤ˜ ·ÓÂıÓÈÎÒ˜. ∞˘Ù¤˜ ÔÈ
ıˆڋÛÂȘ Â›Ó·È ÈÔ ÂÊ·ÚÌfiÛÈ̘ ÙÒÚ·, Ô˘ Ù· ÚÔÁÓˆÛÙÈο ÙÔ˘ ÔÏÈÙÈÎÔ‡
Î·È ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈÎÔ‡ ‚·ÚÔ̤ÙÚÔ˘ Â›Ó·È ¯¿ÏÎÈÓ·. ∏ ÈÛÙÔÚ›· Ù˘ ‰›‰˘Ì˘
ÔÚÁ¿ÓˆÛ˘ Û ·˘Ù‹Ó ÙËÓ ÛÊ·›Ú· Â›Ó·È ‰È‰·ÎÙÈ΋ Î·È ÔÈ ÁÓˆÛÙÈΤ˜ ÙÔ˘˜
ÂÊ·ÚÌÔÁ¤˜ ı· Â›Ó·È ¿ÓÙ· ¤Ó· ÙÔÓˆÙÈÎfi ÛÙȘ ÔÏ˘ÒÓ˘Ì˜ Î·È È‰ÈfiÌÔÚʘ
ÂıÓÈΤ˜ ÔÈÎÔÓƠ̂˜. ∏ Á¤ÓÂÛË ÌÈ·˜ ÚÔÁÚ·ÌÌ·ÙÈṲ̂Ó˘ ÔÚÁ¿ÓˆÛ˘ ı·
ÂÓÈÛ¯‡ÛÂÈ ·˘Ù¤˜ ÙȘ ÔÏÈÙÈΤ˜. °È' ·˘ÙfiÓ ÙÔ ÏfiÁÔ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙˆ›˙ˆ ÌÂ
Û˘Ì¿ıÂÈ·, ·ÏÏ¿ fi¯È ¯ˆÚ›˜ ÎÚÈÙÈ΋ ‰È¿ıÂÛË, ¤Ó· ‹ ‰‡Ô ı¤Ì·Ù· Ì ÙÔ˘˜
·ÔÛÙfiÏÔ˘˜ Ù˘ ÈÂÚ·Ú¯›·˜ ÙˆÓ ÔÚÁ¿ÓˆÓ Ì·˜ ÛÙÔÓ ˙‹ÏÔ ÙÔ˘˜ Ó·
ÚÔÁÚ·ÌÌ·Ù›ÛÔ˘Ó ÔÚıfi‰Ô͘ ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈΤ˜ Î·È ÓÔÌÈÛÌ·ÙÈΤ˜ ÔÏÈÙÈΤ˜.
∞ÔÏÔÁÔ‡Ì·È Ô˘ Û·˜ Ù˘Ú¿ÓÓËÛ· Ì ÙËÓ ÂÏÏËÓÈ΋ ÌÔ˘ ÊÚ·ÛÂÔÏÔÁ›·. ™ÙÔÓ
Â›ÏÔÁfi ÌÔ˘ ‰›Óˆ ¤ÌÊ·ÛË ÛÙËÓ Â˘ÏÔÁ›· ÌÔ˘, ÚÔ˜ ÙÔ˘˜ ÊÈÏfiÍÂÓÔ˘˜
·˘Ùfi¯ıÔÓ˜ ·˘Ù‹˜ Ù˘ ÎÔÛÌÔÔÏ›ÙÈ΢ ÌËÙÚfiÔÏ˘ ηıÒ˜ Î·È ÙÔ ÂÁÎÒÌÈfi
ÌÔ˘ ÚÔ˜ ÂÛ¿˜, ·ÚÈÔÈ ÛÙÂÓÔÁÚ¿ÊÔÈ.

3
†