The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES)

||Volume||2 ||Issue|| 6 ||Pages|| 01-11||2013||

ISSN(e): 2319 – 1813 ISSN(p): 2319 – 1805

 Reduction of Defects in Latex Dipping Production: A Case Study

in a Malaysian Company for Process Improvement
1,
M.C. Ng , 2,Hasnida Ab-Samat , 3, Shahrul Kamaruddin
1,2,3,
School of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Campus Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM),
Penang, Malaysia

--------------------------------------------------------ABSTRACT-----------------------------------------------------------
Six Sigma is based in large measure on creating a closed-loop business system to reduce company’s
inconsistency or “variations” of business system and keep it staying on the path to performance and success.
Defects, which are the bad variation that have a negative impact on customers and the approaches used to
monitor and improve them, can be defined as “process improvement”. This paper presents the
implementation of process improvement in a latex production company in Malaysia. The Six Sigma Way is
proposed and DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) phases are developed to accomplish the
process improvement efforts. These phases had been applied in latex dipping production line that identified
as the most critical area of cost compelling to the company.

KEYWORDs - Defects, Dipping process, Latex product, Process improvement, Six Sigma.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Submission: 31st May 2013, Date of Publication: 18.June.2013
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. INTRODUCTION
Oxygen mask, stethoscope tubing, adhesive tape, gloves, toys, balloon, swimming cap and rubber
band are a few examples of medical and household products made from latex and rubber. These products are
essentials for daily life and the demands for it are sky-rocketing day by day [1]. Nowadays, the latex industry
has become very competitive and requires high volume production to achieve profitability. Technologies and
manufactures also faced with challenging tasks in developing high quality latex product with minimum cost
possible. For medical latex products in example surgical gloves, there is also a safety issue concerning how
defected products can cause contamination as well as risks in provoking allergic reaction to patients and
medical workers [2].

In Malaysia, abundant sources of high quality and natural latex form rubber make it a suitable place
for production of latex products. However, the production of these products, results in a lot of waste after
manufacturing due to quality problems. Therefore, production capacity usually did not meet order requirements
due to high end result of scraps. Late deliveries sometimes occur where in certain cases; company has to bear
the costs of compensation. Besides, the other obstacle is high inventory in certain items. Therefore, company
needs to adopt suitable process improvement method to solve the problems. Six Sigma is one of the best tools
that improve the reliability and quality of products by focusing on the process of reducing defects in
manufacturing [3].
A case study in a latex production line in Malaysia was carried out with an objective of finding out a
strategy for developing focused solutions to reduce product defects using DMAIC approach from Six Sigma
method. Six Sigma is widely implemented in the industry due to its‟ well structured methodology that enable
company to achieve their goal through continuous improvement [4]. DMAIC and Six Sigma are key methods
in the process yet as highlighted by [5], lack of implementation model detailing the steps and phases
contributes to failure of the program. Six Sigma places a clear center of attention on bottom-line impact in
hard dollar savings and company‟s cash flow [6 & 7]. No Six Sigma project will be approved unless the team
determines the investments generated from it. Six Sigma also has been very successful in integrating both
human aspects (culture change, training, customer focus, etc.) and process aspects (process stability, variation
reduction, capability, etc.). Finally, Six Sigma technique creates a powerful infrastructure for training of
champions, master black belts, black belts, green belts and yellow belts [8 & 9].

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 1

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

In this paper, remedial actions are taken to reduce the most serious revealed quality problems produced by
one of the common process known as latex-dipping process. This paper is organized as follows: Section 2
provides process improvement concept and the six sigma approach. In Section 3, DMAIC framework is
presented and process improvement for a case study towards implementing the DMAIC approach is discussed.
Finally, Section 4 concludes the process improvement implementation and possible future work is given.

II. PROCESS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPT AND SIX SIGMA APPROACH

Process improvement is the analysis and redesign of processes to eliminate organizational problems
and inefficiencies in small increments, over time, by improving one or two processes at a time. It is done on an
operational level (as opposed to radical re-engineering which is done on a strategic level) and is carried out
primarily by the people most involved in the process. The incremental process improvement approach builds in
small successes that motivate teams to continue. Failure, if it occurs, has less potential to do serious damage
because scope is limited to one or two processes at a time. Incremental process improvement can be a good way
to realize benefits in quality and organizational performance while bringing people together over a common
goal. It can stimulate self-esteem and inspire employees to look for innovative ways to deal with challenges.
There have been many “improvement models” applied to processes over the years since the quality movement
began. Most of these are based on the steps introduced by W. Edwards Deming – Plan-Do-Check-Act or P-D-
C-A – which describes the basic logic of data-based process improvement. For this paper, the Six Sigma Way,
a five-phase improvement cycle is used an approach for problem solving. There are: Define, Measure,
Analysis, Improve, and Control – or DMAIC method [10]. It is a closed-loop method that eliminates
unproductive steps and also applies technology for continuous improvement approach [11]. Detail study from
the perspective of scientific theories on the DMAIC method by [12] shows that it works as problem structuring
device by breaking down the problem solving tasks into sequence of generic subtasks. Then, the method will
give synergistic benefits and help companies in achieving consistency in operations [13]. Fig. 1 shows the
complete cycle of DMAIC in a form of framework for the Six Sigma implementation in the case study
company.

Define problems
Goal, Constraint
and Assumption

Ensure success Assess

from changes Baseline
are sustained Performance
DMAIC

Idea Generation,
Solutions Selection Identify Root
and Causes to
Implementation Problems

Figure 1: Framework of DMAIC steps conducted in the case study company

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 2

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

III. CASE STUDY

The case study company emphasizes that providing good quality product to its customers by reducing
defects is their main goal. This implies a competitive company must have both high quality goods and provide
a high quality of service. The company now leads the latex products industry that service local market needs
because it goes beyond value-adding activities such as logos printing. It constantly adds and refines its
production capacity and improvements are done with an eye of possible dismantling due to offshoring,
outsourcing and the increasingly integrated global supply-chain. Capacity adding and improvement must
constantly focus on taking advantage of the present void in the market but must be ready for incremental
adjustment or major redesign for future.
The proposed Six Sigma approach is applied in the latex dipping production line of the company.
Dipping process is the favourite process of latex product like glove, balloon, condom and toys [14]. The
dipping process is a process where coagulant-coated formers are dipper into rubber latex at a certain dipping
rate and characteristics [15]. Then the rubber films are removed while the formers are cleaned using acidic and
some basic solutions so that it can be reused for the new dipping process. The process allows for production of
thin latex product with various types and colour that can meet individual customer‟s need. The finished
product from latex dipping also can be decorated in numbers of ways like printing or stamping. In the
company, chemicals used in dipping process are found to have great influence in products‟ quality. The raw
material, rubber latex and chemical added such as colour pigment, wetting agent, dispersing agent, powder,
coagulant and etc are rigorously controlled in order to attain high quality product. The mechanical action of
the process also affects the quality of the final products. The framework introduced in this paper focuses on the
process of reducing defects created during the whole dipping process. The five-phase improvement cycle,
DMAIC is grounded in the original PDCA cycle and will be used to apply to Process Improvement effort.

3.1. STEP 1: DEFINE PROBLEMS, GOAL, CONSTRAINT AND ASSUMPTION

For the first step of the process improvement effort, problems that occurred in the company are
clarified and made clear who is the customer (downstream and end users) served and impacted by this
problem. First, the Project Rationale has been clearly understood by the improvement team and ensured that
the team began to focus on a problem. Problems are collected from three section which are function and
printing department (downstream) as well as complaints from end-users at the case study company. In function
department, bad quality of the latex products affects the speed and quality of product decoration and
installation. High rate of bursting delays the work of product decorators. This in turn increases the cost of
operation of the company in term of labor cost (time) and material cost (rubber latex and helium gas). The
quality of latex product in terms of consistency in size, shape and tone affects the aesthetics of the final look of
the decoration. The final look of decorations is often perceived as the quality measure of a product decorator.
The similar issues occurred in printing department. The quality of latex products affects the speed and quality
of printing process. High bursting rate also delays the printing process. This has increased the time to complete
the particular order and meet the deadline, while the quality of latex product in term of consistency in even
shape after inflation affects the printing visual. The aesthetic of printing is often professed as the quality
measure of a customer.
Another trouble faced by the company is complaints from the customers about the skewed logos
printed on the finished latex product. The customers stand for product decorators, event companies, and direct
consumer who purchase the product. Due to the quality problems that occur, result in end users to ship back
the products. Sometimes, the company has to re-produce the products or offer cheaper price for its customers.
This increase the company financial cost and lost in term of profit. Hence, in this stage, the objective is defined
as to reduce the percentage of balloons defects. In sigma language, it increases from 2 sigma level to 4 sigma
level.
To implement the Six Sigma way in the company, constraints and assumptions are defined in order
to narrow down the project scope. In this process improvement effort, the scope is limited to achieving
incremental change instead of complete re-engineering or redesign of process. There are other processes that
create products defects but this project is only limited to improvement in dipping machine production process
and not management process or issues. In other words, defects created by the dipping machine are going to be
studied. Furthermore, this study does not involve improvement in material or material engineering. The last
element consist in this stage is identify downstream and customer requirements. Thus surveys are done to
ensure the problem and goal is defined in term of customer requirements and endows with information on

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 3

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

possible defect rate measures for the next step. For downstream department, they require pinhole free product
so that this will not affect the speed of printing and installation. The products also need to be in an even
shape after inflation so that the logos printed are not skewed. Lastly, products without color patches, without
internal and external surface stickiness and good bead rolling are required as to ensure it will not delay the
work of decorators. While for end users, they are more concern about the products aesthetic, no breakage,
lasted long, easy to use, cheap and chemical friendly.

3.2. STEP II: ASSESS BASELINE MEASURE

In the second stage, baseline measure is targeted to the total reject quantity. To narrow down the scope,
the total reject is classified into different type of defects and a list of deficiency was produced. Next, data were
gathered from three targeted fields which are printing department, function department and end users. For
each type of defect listed above, 10 samples (30 latex products per sample) were collected and the number of
that particular type of defect was recorded. From the three departments in the company, it can be found out
that the most significant defects to the problem are latex products with uneven wall thickness, uneven shape
after inflation and bursting.

3.3. STEP 3: ANALYZE PROCESS AND IDENTIFY ROOT CAUSES TO PROBLEMS

The third step in the improvement plan conducted in the case study company is to analyze the process
and then identify the root causes to each problems or defects that occur. In doing so, latex-dipping process is
first studied and analyzed. In dipping process, the mechanical action of making latex products affects the final
product quality. In order to make a product, formers or moulds of the latex product are hanging straight down
and installed on a chain. Then the formers are dipped into the coagulant and liquid latex as the chain moves.
The latex runs on the formers affects the evenness of the wall of the product. The common problem during this
stage is that the product‟s nozzle will be thinner while the end of the product will be thicker and stronger.
Continuing the process, the chain moves horizontally and inclined down when going to dip into the
compounded liquid latex. Then it slants at an angle up and moves horizontally again to the next station. When
the formers incline up, the latex started to run and at the same time, it started to coagulate as well. This will
cause one side wall is a little thicker than the other. The latex product will blow up with a curve and can be
seen that the product with uneven shape after inflation. This situation also contributes to high bursting rate of
product during usage.Some purchase order from customers required that logos to be printed on the products.
For this purpose, the products are sent to printing department. During this process, uneven shape after
inflation slows down the logo printing rate. After the product is 90% expanded, the printing process is
conducted. The printed logo will be skewed if the products are not expanding evenly. This has a great effect on
product aesthetic. Therefore, the analysis of latex-dipping process managed to identify three types of product
defect. The defects are:
1. Defect 1 - Uneven shape after inflation
2. Defect 2 - Uneven wall thickness
3. Defect 3 - High bursting rate
Once the defects were identified, the improvement process continued with building a list of possible
root causes for defects on latex products. In this framework, the 4M‟s (Material, Machine, Measure and
Method), and 1P (People) in fish bone method is used to find out the root causes. By establishing categories of
potential causes, it helps to ensure a team thinks of many possibilities, rather than just focusing on a few
typical areas. Through these diagrams, some main suspect causes could be identified. It also provides the focus
to assist process and data analysis. The root causes for Defect 1 are shown with Fish-Bone Diagram in Fig 2.

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 4

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

Figure 2: Root Causes of Uneven Shape after Inflation

For Defect 2 which is uneven wall thickness of the latex product, the root causes are as shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 3: Root Causes of Uneven Wall Thickness

By referring to Fig.2 and Fig.3, discussion conducted shows that Defect 1 and Defect 2 share similar
root causes. From the analysis, uneven coagulant and latex distribution cause the uneven product shape after
inflation and uneven wall thickness of the end product. Besides uneven liquid latex distribution on the
product‟s formers, there are other factors that affect shape after inflation. In „Material‟ factor, poor coagulant
wetting on formers causes the jagged coagulant allocation. When dipped into liquid latex, this will cause
uneven and poor latex pick up. Therefore, the product will form a curve shape after inflation and during usage.
Another root causes identified is that improper former cleaning cause‟s uneven wall thickness. After the latex
products are stripped from their formers, the formers have to go through water cleaning before start another
cycle. This process is known as coagulant dipping. If the formers are not properly cleaned, then remaining
coagulant is not totally removed and when it later dipped into latex, the situation will cause uneven latex pick
up. This is the root cause of uneven wall thickness happened. Furthermore, when the products are pulled out
from the formers, the viscous latex is going to run. This slightly affects the wall thickness of the finished
products. Once all the root causes of Defect 1 and Defect 2 were identified, fish-bone analysis was conducted
for Defect 3. The root causes are shown in Fig. 4.
www.theijes.com The IJES Page 5
 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

The other main defect that contributes to the towering reject level is high products bursting rate. The
initial measure can be made by pin hole and fish eye occurrence. If the pin hole exists, the product will burst
during inflation. Same as fish eye existence as well, the small particular section wall thickness is thinner.
While inflating, the product expanded and the section could not stand the strength and burst then. Analysis of
the dipping process shows that the presence of pin hole always closely related with the former cleanliness.
Impurity exists to formers result in blockage to latex distribution. Hereby the product formed will have pin hole
types of defect. Impurity presence at former caused improper cleaning way and cleaning frequency. Ineffective
deaeration also causes scattered impurity in former. On the other hand, no filtration system to trap lumps in
coagulant and liquid latex is another cause to impurity presence.

Material Measure

Bubbles in Former
Excessive coagulant cleanliness
Pin
loss of
hole
ammonia in
latex Bubbles in Air entrapment
compound latex dip
tank Fish
eye High
Bursting
Rate
Inadequate
Do not check dryness of
latex coagulant Without
viscosity No
before latex proper
filtration
Without dip former
system to
proper cleaning
trap lumps Angle of latex
coagulant Do not check Non- immersion and
cleaning coagulant effective extraction too
compound deaeration steep

People Method Machine

Figure 4: Root Causes of High Bursting Rate

Another observation shows that the presence of fish eye directly interrelated with the air entrapment in
the coagulant or liquid latex. This factor is also the reason to the uneven both coagulant and latex distribution
on formers. The other possibilities to high bursting rate are inadequate dryness of coagulant before latex dip
and insufficient curing time after stripping. This means after heating process and product take-off from the
formers, the products need some time to cure and could not continuing with the logo printing process at the
very instance.

From the fishbone diagrams in Fig.2, 3 and 4, it could be understand that different defects also share
same root causes. Then the most common root causes were extracted from the fishbone diagrams and Pareto
chart is used to identify the most common occurrences or causes of the highest defect rates. Although there is
no absolute certainty of root causes, data about the process and its performance are analyzed to help stratify the
problem and potential root causes were recognized. The main cause had been verified through logical analysis
and based on expert-judgement of the workers. The process and the place where the cause was suspected to be
happening were checked through observation.

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 6

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

3.4. STEP 4: IDEA GENERATION, SOLUTIONS SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION

It‟s important during Improve to look for ways to maximize the benefits of efforts. Once all the defects
and its root causes are identified, the best way to start the Improve phase is to find out the possible actions or
ideas that will help to address the root causes of the problem and achieve the goal. After that, which of these
ideas could form workable potential solutions are identified. Based on the case study, several ideas of how to
solve the problems are collected for workers involved in the process. Then, the redundant ideas were
eliminated. Then the remaining ones are organized and the list was narrowed to five ideas. After that, some
selection criteria (as shown in Table 1) to assist in making the most appropriate solution decision are
identified.

Table 1: Selection Criteria

No. Selection Criteria

1. Ease of handling
2. Ease of implementation
3. Cost to operate
4. Durability
5. Portability
Require less/little
6.
maintenance
7. Convenience
8. Ergonomics
Ideas generated in the Improve phase are like raw
material to be refined to have real value to the organization. Usually, Six Sigma solutions will be combinations
of ideas that together make up a plan. It‟s important to recognize that solution selection may not be an either/or
choice. Combination several actions into one plan are okay. On the other hand, a “shotgun” solution that
sprays many different mini-fixes at the problem can be a big waste of resources. Here, Matrix tool is used to
select the best applicable solution. The proposed ideas go through concept screening and concept scoring then
the final decision is made.Based on the case study, solutions for major defect rate are investigated. From the
defect analysis in the previous step, it could be found out that products do not expand evenly and uneven wall
thickness shared the common root causes. Hence, means of settlement for these two defects are almost similar.
Hereby, both defects were under the same category and solution statements could be created together. In,
addition, the improvement methods for high bursting rate was also investigated.

i) Referring to Defect 1: uneven shape after inflation and uneven wall thickness, some improvement methods
are proposed.
a. Better coagulant wetting
b. Modify chain track and angle
c. Modify dip tank
d. Frequent formers cleaning
e. Sufficient formers drying using fan
f. Reference (current machine design)
Next, two Criteria Matrix were set up so might conduct comparison among improvement methods based
on the selection criteria. Firstly concept screening matrix was constructed (refer to Table 2). Rough initial
improvement methods were evaluated and coarse comparative rating system was used.

Table 2: Concept Screening for Uneven shape after Inflation Improvement Methods

Improvement Methods
Selection Criteria A B C D E F
Ease of handling - 0 + 0 0 0
Ease of implementation + 0 + - + 0
Cost to operate 0 - - + + 0
Durability 0 + 0 - 0 0
Portability 0 0 + + + 0
Require little maintenance - 0 0 + + 0

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 7

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

Convenience - + + - - 0
Ergonomics 0 0 0 - - 0
Sum +‟s 1 2 4 3 4 0
Sum 0‟s 4 5 3 1 2 8
Sum –„s 3 1 1 4 2 0
Net Score -2 1 3 -1 2 0
Rank 6 3 1 5 2 4
Continue? No Combine Yes No Yes Combine

Additional resolution is needed to distinguish among opposing improvement methods, a finer scale is used
as listed in Table 3.

Table 3: Selection Scale

Relative Performance Rating

Much worse than reference 1
Worse than reference 2
Same as reference 3
Better than reference 4
Much better than reference 5

After some alternatives were eliminated, the team moved on to concept scoring (refer to Table 4). More
detailed analyses were conducted and quantitative evaluations of the remaining concepts were accomplished.
Table 4: Concept Scoring for Uneven shape after Inflation Improvement Methods

Improvement Methods
B&F C E
Selection Criteria Weight Ratin Weighted Ratin Weighted Ratin Weighted
g Score g Score g Score
Ease of handling 25% 3 0.75 4 1.0 3 0.75
Ease of 20% 3 0.6 3 0.6 3 0.6
implementation
Cost to operate 10% 2 0.2 2 0.2 4 0.4
Durability 10% 4 0.4 4 0.4 3 0.3
Portability 5% 2 0.1 5 0.25 4 0.2
Require little 15% 3 0.45 3 0.45 4 0.6
maintenance
Convenience 10% 4 0.4 4 0.4 2 0.2
Ergonomics 5% 3 0.15 3 0.15 2 0.1
Total 3.05 3.45 3.15
score
Rank 3 1 2
Continue? No Develop No

Lastly, with the guide gained from these selection matrixes, final decision could be made and then could go
for further step, which is implementing process improvement.
ii) Referring to Defect 3, high bursting rate; the similar method was used to choose the workable improvement
ideas. Some proposed improvement methods are:
a) Proper former cleaning
b) Sufficient drying using fan
c) Adequate dryness using oven
d) Low foaming wetting agent for coagulant
e) Longer curing time
f) Reference (current machine design)

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 8

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

For Defect 3, concept screening is as shown in Table 5 while scoring shown in Table 6.

Table 5: Concept Screening for High Bursting Rate Improvement Methods

Improvement Methods
Selection Criteria A B C D E F
Ease of handling 0 0 - - - 0
Ease of implementation - + + + 0 0
Cost to operate + + + 0 - 0
Durability 0 0 0 0 + 0
Portability + + - 0 - 0
Require little + + - - 0 0
maintenance
Convenience 0 - 0 - - 0
Ergonomics - - 0 0 0 0
Sum +‟s 3 4 2 1 1 0
Sum 0‟s 3 2 3 4 0 8
Sum –„s 2 2 3 3 4 0
Net Score 1 2 -1 -2 -3 0
Rank 2 1 4 5 6 3
Continue? Yes Yes No No Combine Combine

Table 6: Concept Screening for High Bursting Rate Improvement Methods

Improvement Methods
A B E&F
Selection Weight Ratin Weighte Ratin Weighte Ratin Weighte
Criteria g d Score g d Score g d Score
Ease of 25% 4 1.0 4 1.0 3 0.75
handling
Ease of 20% 4 0.8 5 1.0 3 0.6
implementation
Cost to operate 10% 3 0.3 2 0.2 3 0.3
Durability 10% 3 0.3 3 0.3 3 0.3
Portability 5% 3 0.15 2 0.1 3 0.15
Require little 15% 4 0.6 4 0.6 3 0.45
maintenance
Convenience 10% 3 0.3 3 0.3 3 0.3
Ergonomics 5% 3 0.15 3 0.15 3 0.15
Total 3.6 3.65 3.0
score
Rank 2 1 3
Continue? Develop Develop No

For both defects stated earlier, the improvement methods that score the highest rank are going to be
implemented. To make balloons with good quality, the improvement team got full support from the Managing
Director and approval to start the implementation. And, the company is will to scatter large sum of money to
invest for new equipment. The team starts planning for the implementation by making new ordering and
delivery procedure of the hydraulic system. Within couple of weeks, the hydraulic system was installed at the
machine, at the bottom of the latex dip tank. Based on the initial machine design, the formers are dipped into
the compounded liquid latex with eight colours per cycle. Usually one or two colours of products are needed

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 9

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

per order made by customers. The remaining balloons are kept as inventory. Besides, it is time consuming to
clean the tank in order to change other coloured liquid latex. With the new design, the dip tank can be taken
out if not used. This means, the different coloured liquid latex tank can be installed or remove in accordance
with the demand. Besides, the cleaning process and production can be run simultaneously. Production lead
time as well as quality problem can be reduced. The inventory can be reduced too at the same time can meet
customer requirement and diminish late delivery. To make products with even wall thickness from top to
bottom, the company has to invest in expensive equipment to spin the formers as they turned over. The task is
tuff as new design for the chain and requires chain speed adjustment. Niggling maintenance chore is needed
too. The company decided to use the idea proposed above which up-down hydraulic dip tank is. The chain
moves horizontally without changing the steep angle at the dip tank. Good quality products can be produced
and it is ease of handling in term of maintenance. Compliant with another defect which is high bursting rate,
the company employed other improvement methods to solve this problem. The method used is utilizing fans to
provide sufficient formers and coagulant drying as well as better deaeration. On the other hand, the method of
cleaning process is probed and additional former cleaning frequency is needed to make sure no impurity
particles are stickled on the formers. This method is desirable as it involves less cost to operate and requires
little maintenance. The company has a backup production method that is hand dipping so the new system
would not cause even more late delivery or greater defect rate if it did not work. After the improvement process
is done, the improvement team took measure on the rate of products defect. From the results obtained, the
defect rates have been reduced. In sigma language, the average defect rates develop from 2 sigma level to 4
sigma level.

3.5. STEP 5: ENSURE SUCCESS FROM CHANGES ARE SUSTAINED

Control is the last stage of DMAIC and it also is the beginning of the sustained improvement and
integration of the Six Sigma effort as DMAIC is a closed-loop cycle. Both short- and long-term challenges of
sustaining Six Sigma improvement and building all the concepts and methods are explored into an ongoing,
cross-functional management approach. It is considered as additional effort that will be continued by the case
study company.

IV. CONCLUSION
In this Six Sigma implementation in a case study company, the total rejects due to high defect rate have
been reduced after remedial actions are taken. The company invested in hydraulic system along with „up-
down‟ latex dip tank and this purchasing and installation of equipment was completed within one month. In
accordance with the declined defect rate, the capacity could also meet customer requirements well. As a result
of this, delivery on time as well as good quality products can be achieved. By using the new hydraulic system
on latex dip tank, high inventory in certain items can be reduced to minimal. This is because the manufacturer
only runs the production according to the purchase order. It brings success in applying it to the company
production line. This project brings challenges of launching, leading and preparing people for the Six Sigma
effort. Since the defect rates have been reduced after adopting the continuous process improvement method, the
company could look into investigation on other improvement efforts to increase its marginal profit.

REFERENCES
[1] V.V. Rajan, W.K. Dierkes, R. Joseph and J.W.M. Noordermeer, Science and technology of rubber reclamation with special attentions
to NR-based waste latex products. Progress in Polymer Science, 31, 2006, 811-834.
[2] E. Yip, and P. Cacioli, The manufacture of gloves from natural rubber latex. Journal of Allergy Clinical and Immunol, 110(2),
2002, S3-S14.
[3] D.U. Kumar, D. Nowicki, J.E. Ramirez-Marquez, and D. Verma, On the optimal selection of process alternatives in a Six Sigma
implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 2008, 456-467.
[4] C.T. Su, and C.J. Chou, A systematic methodology for creation of six sigma projects: a case study of seminconductor foundry. Expert
Systems with Application, 34, 2008, 2696-273.
[5] S.S. Chakravorty, Six Sigma programs: an implementation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 119, 2009, 1-
16.
[6] R.K. Padhy and S. Sahu, A real option based Six Sigma project evaluation and selection model. International Journal of Project
Management, 29, 2011, 1091-1102.
[7] M. Swink and B.W. Jacobs, Six Sigma adoption: operating performance impacts and contextual drivers of success. Journal of
Operations Management, 30, 2012, 437-453.
[8] M. Harry and R. Schroeder, Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionising the World’s Top Corporations
(NY: Random House, 2000).
[9] S.P. Peter, P.N. Robert and R.C. Roland, The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies Are Honing Their
Performance (USA: McGraw-Hill, 2000).
[10] C.W. Adams, P. Gupta and C. Wilson, Six Sigma Deployment (MA: Butterworth Heinemann, 2003)
[11] Y.H. Kwak and F.T. Anbari, Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach. Technovation, 26, 2006, 708-715.

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 10

 Reduction Of Defects In Latex Dipping Production...

[12] J. de Mast and J. Lokkerbol, An analysis of the six sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving. International
Journal of Production Economics, 139, 2012, 604-614.
[13] G.V. Prabhushankar, S.R. Devadasan, P.R. Shalij and V. Thirunavukkarasu, Design of Innovative Six Sigma Quality Management
Systems. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 3(1), 2009, 76-100.
[14] C. Rattanapan, T.T. Suksaroj and W. Ounsaneha, Development of eco-efficiency indicators for rubber glove product by material flow
analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 2012, 99-106.
[15] L. Sikong, M. Masae, K. Kooptarnond, W. Taweepreda and F. Saito, Improvement of hydrophilic property of rubber dipping former
surface with Ni/B/TiO2 nano-composite film. Applied Surface Science, 258, 2012, 4436-4443.

BIOGRAPHIES
M.C. Ng received the B.Eng. (Hons) Degree in Manufacturing Engineering with Management from Universiti
Sains Malaysia in 2008. Her research interest is on industrial engineering and manufacturing system.

Hasnida Ab-Samat received the B.Eng. (Hons) Degree in Manufacturing Engineering with Management from
Universiti Sains Malaysia in 2007 and has completed her M.Sc in the School of Mechanical Engineering at the
University Sains Malaysia, in 2010. Her research interest is on industrial engineering, manufacturing system
and maintenance management.

Shahrul Kamaruddin received the B.Eng.(Hons) degree from University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland in
1996, the M.Sc. degree from University of Birmingham, U.K., in 1998, and the PhD from University of
Birmingham, in 2003.Currently an associate professor in the School Mechanical Engineering (under the
manufacturing engineering with management programme),Universiti Sains Malaysia. He has various past
experiences with manufacturing industries from heavy to electronics industries especially in the field of
industrial engineering, manufacturing processes and product design. He has more than 60 publications in
reputed international and national journals/conferences. His current research interests include simulation and
modeling of manufacturing systems, production planning and control, maintenance management and
application of artificial intelligence techniques in manufacturing.

www.theijes.com The IJES Page 11