Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P2 Wines Internet Censorship Essay
P2 Wines Internet Censorship Essay
Ethan Koh
P2-Wines
Honors ELA 8
11 November 2020
Internet Censorship
Harming businesses, removing freedom of speech, depriving people of learning the truth.
This is the result of internet censorship. It eliminates beneficial concepts and ideas that some
people disagree with. Censorship towards businesses has cost them a great deal. They rely on the
internet to advertise their services and products. It also harms the sales and profits of these
businesses. Even though many articles and studies state that censorship is significant in society,
the study or report might be censored itself; consequently, this will cause less understanding and
deeper understanding, causes an increase in expenses to monitor, and violates civil rights.
comprehension. Many people around the world want to learn and expand their knowledge by
researching online, but some research and articles are censored. One major prerequisite for
career growth and development is free access to information, but limiting that information is a
sure way of inhibiting this growth in career prospects and the development in the same thereafter
(Layne). There are countless people and even students that are interested in the latest ideas or
concepts. However, censorship can add a barrier and prevent the developing brains of kids to
learn and enlarge understanding of current views. Furthermore, internet censorship can reduce
the overall intelligence of the public. Censorship is an attempt to prevent individuals from
discovering what the truth of any situation happens to be (Miller). When fake or false
Koh 2
information comes through, people will believe in it and spread false rumors. When there are no
real details because of blocks from censorship, the public will not believe in it; thus, reducing the
general reasoning of the widespread population. Even though there are websites with gruesome
material, the text or script may be beneficial and helpful. Therefore, internet censorship discards
helpful material that can form new points of view and ensure a finer conception.
censoring material on the internet, it will charge the government and normal people more money
and stress. According to research from Darrell West, VP and Director of Governance Studies and
the founding director of the Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, internet shutdowns
cost countries $2.4 billion in 2015, and it will come at the expense of taxpayers (Gaille). Not
only does internet censorship harm the government, but it also causes higher stress and taxes for
normal citizens. Since censorship is expensive, the government needs to pay more; thus,
increasing taxes for the population. Equally as important, online restriction and connectivity cuts
have cost the government an immense amount of money. The decision to cut connectivity in
Egypt came at a cost of $90 million (Gaille). This is a waste of money that could’ve been used to
help the economy and other small businesses. Since billions and billions of dollars have been
spent on internet censorship alone, it has provided a negative economic impact. Although many
nations can donate money to help enforce internet censorship, huge amounts of struggle and
difficulty can restrict donations. After all, internet censorship is an expensive process to surveil.
Lastly, internet censorship violates civil rights. When posting and adding something
online, freedom of speech and expression come into play. But when internet censorship refrains
the writing or picture to be seen to the world, that is an infringement of civil rights. Opponents of
internet censorship argue that by making this a law, freedom of the press, expression, and speech
Koh 3
is killed and is a violation of the First Amendment (Miller). Since the First Amendment of the
Bill of Rights states the prohibition of creating a law that infringes freedom of speech, internet
censorship disobeys the First Amendment. This can cause more unnecessary speeches, posts on
social media, protests, and possibly violence. Furthermore, internet suppression can cause a lack
of self-confidence. Too much internet censorship inhibits self-expression in the sense that it
denies people that wholesome ability. In doing so, it leads to shyness and a lack of assurance
(Layne). When people want to express themselves freely, they usually would post something on
the internet or social media. Since internet censorship has a chance of putting a blockade in front
of the posts, it has a high chance of lowering or even eliminating a person’s self-confidence.
Although there are reasons to censor a post or script, censorship is not the best way to obstruct
something. It should be treated with a “warn” to someone who comes across something like that.
In the end, internet censorship undermines civil rights and can cause a lack of self-confidence.
amount of money, and disrupts natural civil rights. A large number of people want to learn,
create, and post freely with no concern. But, online censorship can cease new knowledge and
understanding. Because of this, huge amounts of money are poured in; thus, increasing taxes for
the population. Also, censoring these items violates civil rights and the First Amendment. There
is already enough evidence to demonstrate that internet censorship is very disagreeable. It puts a
Works Cited
Gaille, Louise. "13 Internet Censorship Pros and Cons." 22 July 2017, vittana.org/13-internet-
censorship-pros-and-cons.
Layne, Jordon. "24 Intense Pros and Cons of Censorship 2020 | Ablison Energy." Ablison, 16
Miller, Brandon. "11 Chief Pros and Cons of Internet Censorship." Green Garage, 4 Sept. 2015,
greengarageblog.org/11-chief-pros-and-cons-of-internet-censorship.
Miller, Keith. "19 Biggest Pros and Cons of Censorship." FutureofWorking.com, 28 Jan. 2020,
futureofworking.com/11-biggest-pros-and-cons-of-censorship/.