Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IES QuickRWall is a proprietary computer program of Ensoltech. Although every effort has been made
to ensure the accuracy of this program and its documentation, neither Ensoltech nor Integrated
Engineering Software shall be held liable for any mistake, error, or misrepresentation in, or as a result of
the usage of, this program and/or its documentation. The results obtained from this program should not
be substituted for sound engineering judgment.
Sales/support
www.iesweb.com
License 4
Disclaimer 4
Acknowledgements 4
Features 5
Notable Limitations 7
System Requirements 7
Installation Procedure 7
Technical Support 8
REFERENCE ................................................................................................................ 12
Menu Commands 12
File Menu ........................................................................................................................................12
Project Menu...................................................................................................................................13
Design Menu...................................................................................................................................15
View Menu......................................................................................................................................16
Help Menu ......................................................................................................................................17
Input Parameters 18
Criteria Inputs .................................................................................................................................18
Loads Inputs....................................................................................................................................21
Footing Inputs .................................................................................................................................24
Stem Inputs .....................................................................................................................................26
Reports 30
Summary Report .............................................................................................................................30
Full Report ......................................................................................................................................32
Wall Diagram Report ......................................................................................................................32
THEORY ....................................................................................................................... 33
Forces on the Wall 33
Backfill Pressure Calculations ........................................................................................................33
Water in Backfill.............................................................................................................................34
Passive Earth Pressure at the Toe....................................................................................................35
Surcharge (Uniform) .......................................................................................................................35
Stability Checks 39
Sliding.............................................................................................................................................39
Overturning .....................................................................................................................................39
Maximum Bearing Pressure............................................................................................................39
Bearing Pressure Resultant Location ..............................................................................................40
Strength Checks 40
Building Code .................................................................................................................................40
Load Factors....................................................................................................................................40
Heel / Toe Checks ...........................................................................................................................40
Stem Checks....................................................................................................................................41
General Notes..................................................................................................................................42
Design Procedure 43
Complete Design Function..............................................................................................................43
Partial Design Functions .................................................................................................................43
References 44
Thank you for choosing IES QuickRWall. This software package has been created to assist the engineer
in the design of a variety of different retaining walls. Use of this program can save countless hours in the
calculations and documentation associated with retaining wall design. The software has been designed so
that the user may quickly become productive with very little training, but by reading through this manual
and other associated documentation you should be able to resolve any questions that may arise during
program use.
License
Use of this software program is strictly governed by the license agreement that is displayed during the
install process. This program is the copyrighted property of Ensoltech and is provided for the exclusive
use of each licensee. Additional licenses may be obtained exclusively through Integrated Engineering
Software. You may copy the program for backup purposes and you may install it on any computer
allowed in the license agreement. Distributing the program to coworkers, friends, or duplicating it for
other distribution violates the copyright laws of the United States. Future enhancements and technical
support for this product depend on your cooperation in this regard.
Disclaimer
This software has been developed and tested in accordance with applicable building codes, trade guides,
and accepted practice, and every effort has been made to ensure that it operates in accordance with those
standards. However, it is the responsibility of the user to ensure the final design produced is reasonable
and constitutes sound engineering practice. In no event shall Integrated Engineering Software or
Ensoltech be liable for any direct or indirect damages resulting from the use of this software or its related
documentation.
Acknowledgements
The creation of this program was made possible by the influence of many individuals who contributed
ideas, advice, and testing. Particular recognition is due to Dan VanLuchene, Terry Kubat and Lyle
Biekert. Also special thanks to Yvon Michaud for many outstanding ideas and continuous feedback
during development of this latest release.
• Basic Functionality
o Handles both cantilever and restrained walls
o Handles both concrete and masonry
o Lateral support for restrained walls can be located anywhere on the stem
o Concrete strength checks performed according to IBC 2003 / ACI 318-02
o Checks all required load combinations
o Comprehensive support for Canadian CSA A23.3-94 concrete code
o Masonry stems designed via IBC 2003 / MSJC 2002
o Checks for four stability modes: sliding, overturning, maximum bearing pressure, and
bearing resultant location. Checks against user-specified requirement (e.g. factor of
safety) for each.
o Handles tapered stem
o Handles “stepped” stem with multiple changes in thickness and reinforcement.
o Can set default entries to avoid having to repeatedly set parameters that are common to
every project.
• Loads
o Backfill pressure can be calculated automatically via Rankine or Coulomb soil theory, or
specified directly as equivalent fluid pressure.
o Handles sloped backfill
o Handles water in backfill. User can specify different properties for saturated layer.
o Surcharge (uniform) on top of backfill. Can be specified as either a pressure or an
additional depth of backfill.
o Line or strip surcharge on top of the backfill.
o Passive pressure at the toe can be calculated via Rankine method, specified directly (
equivalent fluid pressure), or ignored. Flexible control over the depth from which this
pressure is calculated and how much overburden is ignored.
o Axial dead & live load on stem, with optional eccentricity
o Manually specified lateral pressure on stem (from wind, for example)
o Seismic load (calculated via Mononobe-Okabe method)
o Multiple load cases
o Can enter custom load factors
• Reports
o Three options for reports
Concise summary report
Detailed calculations report
Full-page wall diagram
o Add company logo (optional). This is displayed in the report header
Notable Limitations
These are all features that will be considered in upgrade versions of the product. Decisions about which
items to include are influenced strongly by user feedback, so if some items on this list are more important
to you than others, please let us know!
System Requirements
• Windows NT/98/2000/XP
• 20 MB of hard disk space
• 32 MB of RAM
• Pentium processor
Installation Procedure
Simply run the install program that comes on the CD. The step-by-step wizard will guide you through the
installation process.
Before you contact IES for support, please make sure you have taken full advantage of the readily
available resources that are included with the software:
You should also make sure that you have the latest maintenance update for the software. These updates
are free and can be obtained automatically by going to the Help menu, choosing iesweb.com, and then
choosing Update IES QuickRWall. In this manner you can make sure that the issue you have a question
about has not already been resolved.
Integrated Engineering Software provides technical support for this program via the following methods:
• Email: The best way to send an email is to go to the Help menu, choose iesweb.com, then
choose Email IES Technical Support
• Phone: 406-586-2665
1 Enter
Design Criteria
Input View
Criteria tab
2 Enter
Loads
Input View
Loads tab
3 Automatic Design
(optional)
Design | Do Complete Wall Design menu item
Enter / Modify
4 Wall Dimensions /
Reinforcement Input View
Footing, Stem tabs
5 View Results
Checks / Force
All tabs
Calcs Views
6 Make Changes
(if necessary)
Input View Iterate
7 Print Report
Various Print commands under the File menu
In practice, step 5 (View Results) is usually not a distinct step but an ongoing process that begins after
step 3. With every change you make, the check result display updates automatically, so you can see the
effects of the changes you make on the fly.
The procedure is further described below:
1) Enter Design Criteria. Switch to the Input View and fill out the information on the Criteria tab.
FILE MENU
New
Starts a new project.
Open
Opens an existing project from a file.
Save
Saves the current project. If the project has not been saved yet and does not yet have a file name, a dialog
will prompt for a file name.
Save As
Saves the current project, always prompting for a file name.
Print Setup
Selects a printer and printer connection. Also allows you to choose portrait or landscape page orientation.
This option is there because this is a standard dialog from Microsoft, but you should not select the
landscape option. The report pages are not designed for it and will look funny.
[Recent Files]
Opens the recently used project file with the displayed name.
Exit
Exits the program.
P R O J E CT M E N U
Units
Brings up a dialog box in which you can set preferences for which units the program uses. These units
settings will be saved so that they will also take effect for subsequent projects.
Project Information
Brings up a dialog that allows you to specify information that will be displayed in the header area of
reports.
Options
The options dialog allows you to set some miscellaneous preferences. You can enter a filename for a
logo that will appear in the report header (optional). This file can be a .bmp, .gif, or .jpg file. You can
also check a box to indicate that you’d like to see the program go directly to the Input View on startup,
rather than starting at the Learning View every time. This can be convenient when you have become
familiar with the program and no longer have any need for the Learning View.
Set Defaults…
Brings up a dialog that allows you to indicate that the current input values are to be used as the defaults
for new projects. This allows you to avoid repetitive entry of inputs that are the same for all or most
projects. For example, if you use the program to design short masonry walls 90% of the time, you could
go to the Input View, Stem tab, and change Stem Type to Multi-Section, then change Number of Stem
Sections to 1, and change that one section to masonry. Then go to Project | Set Defaults, make sure that
the Stem checkbox is checked, and click OK. The next time you start the program, it will default to a
masonry stem so you don’t have to change it every time.
It is possible that you may get a message that says “Design Failed”. This means one of two things:
1) Your sizing criteria have constrained the design such that a solution is impossible. An example
of this would be setting maximum toe and heel lengths to 6”. This makes it virtually impossible
for the program to widen the footing enough for the stability checks to be satisfied, so the design
will fail.
2) The design process has gone through thousands of iterations and has failed to find a solution.
After a certain number of iterations it will automatically stop trying in order to prevent your
computer from “locking up”. The root cause of this is likely an error in the program, where the
adjustments it’s making are not able to make the design satisfactory. If you suspect this to be the
case, please email your project file to technical support and we will see about correcting the
design process.
Design Preferences…
This brings up a dialog that lets you specify some settings such as available bars sizes and preferred bar
spacings. This helps to make the automatic design results as practical as possible.
VIEW MENU
Toolbar
Shows / hides the toolbar.
Status Bar
Shows / hides the status bar.
Contents
Brings up the help dialog, which presents a tree-style display of the available help topics.
Software License
Brings up a dialog where current license information can be viewed, or new license information can be
entered.
This section provides a full description of all of the information that you enter in the Input View. The
various inputs are organized into the same groups in which they appear in the Input View:
• Criteria
• Loads
• Footing
• Stem
C RI T E R I A I NP U T S
Note: In version 1.0 there was a group of options here called “Subgrade Properties”. These inputs have
been moved. They are now present in the “Passive Pressure @ Toe”group in the Loads inputs.
Design code
Concrete Design Code
Allows a choice of ether IBC 2003 or CSA A23.3-94 as the governing design code for concrete. This will
affect the code provisions and notation used throughout the program. Note that if the wall has a masonry
stem this setting does not affect the masonry checks; they are always performed according to IBC 2003 /
Backfill
Retained Height
The distance between the lower ground level in front of the wall and the backfill level behind the wall. The
wall will automatically be sized to be high enough to satisfy this retained height (plus the extension above
the backfill, if any).
Slope
The angle that the backfill slope makes with the horizontal (zero for a level backfill).
Gamma
The density or unit weight (γ) of the backfill material.
Use Equiv. Fluid Pressure
An option to directly specify an equivalent fluid pressure, or pressure per unit of depth, for the backfill.
You would use this option when you have had the pressure specified directly, say by a geotechnical
engineer, and do not need the program to calculate it.
Equiv. Fluid Density
This is the specified equivalent fluid density, or pressure per unit of depth, for the backfill. This input only
appears if the “Use Equiv. Fluid Pressure” option is chosen.
Analysis Type
When the program calculates the backfill pressure for you, it uses either the Rankine or Coulomb active
earth pressure theory, depending on your choice here. This input will not be visible if Equivalent Fluid
Pressure is selected.
F O O T I N G I NP U T S
This group of inputs mainly controls the characteristics of the footing, although some of them also apply
to the overall wall in general.
General
Burial Depth
The distance between the lower ground level in front of the wall and the bottom of the footing. This depth
should normally be set high enough that the footing gets below the frost depth.
Material
Unit Weight
The unit weight or density of the concrete in the footing. This value is also used for concrete stems.
Concrete F’c
The 28-day compressive strength of the concrete used in the footing and stem.
Rebar Fy
The yield stress of the reinforcement.
S T E M I NP U T S
These inputs control the characteristics of the wall stem. The range of inputs that are available at any one time in the
program will vary based on what the current choice for Stem Type is.
General
Stem Type
This option allows you to choose whether the stem will be composed of multiple sections of (potentially)
different thickness and reinforcement, or a single section that can be tapered. Choose the multi-section
option if you want a masonry stem.
Bars Developed @ Top
This option is required when there is a moment at the top of the stem, such as when there is an eccentric
axial load applied there. In that case the stem must technically have some moment capacity clear up to the
top or it will fail, and hence the bars must be developed somehow. The exact methods by which such bars
might be developed vary and it is outside the scope of this program to get involved with the details; instead,
the user is required to check this box, and a message is prominently displayed on all wall diagrams
indicating that the bars must be developed at the top of the stem by some means.
Has Lateral Support
This option allows you to specify a lateral support on the stem. This is frequently used to model the
'basement wall' or 'restrained wall' condition. Choosing this option changes the available inputs for
reinforcement, since the different applied moment caused by the support will require reinforcement at
different locations.
Reports
• Summary report
• Full report
• Full page wall diagram report
You can print any or all of these reports, depending on what type of information you want, the amount of
detail you need, and the number printed pages you want to have to deal with. Each report has a header on
each page that displays some basic information about the company and the project. This information can
be set by going to the Project menu and choosing the Project Information command. The logo image in
the header can be set by going to the Project menu and choosing Options.
S U M M A R Y R E P O RT
The summary report is designed to give you the most commonly required information in a concise format
that will nearly always fit on one or two pages. The content of the summary report can be roughly broken
down into three sections: input, forces, and checks:
Inputs
The first section in the report contains input data. Between the text and the diagram, this section displays
all significant information that was entered into the program:
Note that the diagrams don’t necessarily show every force that acts on the wall; their aim is to show some
of the calculated values that are not directly specified in the inputs. For example, if there was an axial
force specified, it is not shown on the diagram, nor are the wall weights or backfill weights. A much
more thorough review of the calculation of the forces on the wall is available in the full report.
Much more detailed information about the checks is available in the full report.
FULL REPORT
This report shows detailed calculations for nearly every internal process performed by the program. A
complete set of calculations is included for each load case. For brevity’s sake, complete sample pages
will not be shown for this report.
The program considers forces on the wall originating from the following sources:
• Lateral pressure from the backfill
• Lateral pressure from water in the backfill
• Passive lateral pressure at the toe
• Surcharge on the backfill (uniform)
• Surcharge on the backfill (line/strip)
• Manually specified lateral pressure (e.g. from wind)
• Lateral pressure due to seismic loads
• Axial load on stem
• Weight of the wall
• Weight of the soil (backfill & soil above toe)
• Bearing reaction beneath the footing
• Friction between the footing and soil
Following are discussions on how the force is calculated for each source:
B A C KF I L L P RE S S U R E C AL C U L A T I O N S
The retained backfill will exert a horizontal pressure on the wall. A typical pressure distribution, along
with the associated force resultant, is shown below:
Also note that the force from Coulomb is applied directly to the wall, whereas the force from Rankine is
considered to act on a plane of soil at the end of the heel (as shown above).
The actual equations that are used for each theory type are viewable right in the software output. For
more information, refer to Principles of Foundation Engineering by Braja M. Das (see References
section).
The total lateral force over that portion, however, will increase when the pressure due to the water itself is
considered (see following section).
WATER IN BACKFILL
If there is water in the backfill, it will exert a lateral pressure on the wall. The magnitude of the pressure
is determined by a simple hydrostatic calculation (pressure = depth multiplied by the unit weight of
water). The unit weight of water is fixed at 64 lb/ft3.
Diagram (a) above shows the shape of the pressure distribution that develops when there is no key. When
a key is added, as in (b), the pressure distribution deepens to the bottom of the key, which can increase the
force resultant substantially. Diagram (c) illustrates the case where the engineer has judged the pressure
due to soil immediately in front of the toe to be unreliable and has opted to neglect it. In that case only
the pressure against the key is considered. Diagram (d) shows the effect of neglecting a certain depth of
overburden (pressure is reduced).
This passive pressure contributes to sliding and (possibly) overturning resistance and can play an
important role in ensuring the stability of the wall. Sometimes the fact that the soil in front of the toe gets
disturbed during excavation, or other concerns, will cause concern over whether including a passive
pressure contribution from that soil is reasonable. For this reason the program allows you to indicate that
such pressure is to be excluded from the calculations (as depicted by wall (c) in the diagram above).
The passive pressure can either be calculated via Rankine passive theory, specified directly with an
equivalent fluid density value, or neglected completely.
S U R C H AR G E (U NI F O RM )
The program allows you to specify a uniform surcharge in one of two ways:
• Specify a fictitious additional depth of backfill
• Specify a uniform pressure on the backfill
If an additional depth of backfill is specified, it is converted to a pressure internally and then lateral force
calculations proceed using that pressure.
S U R C H AR G E (L I NE /S T R I P )
You may apply either a line or strip surcharge on the wall. An example of the corresponding pressure
distribution and resultant force for a line load surcharge is shown below:
The corresponding lateral pressures are calculated using the methods outlined in the text Principles of
Foundation Engineering by Braja M. Das, 2nd Edition. The exact equation used for a given loading is
displayed in the output.
This loading requires particularly complicated mathematical routines that can cause a noticeable delay in
the software. This delay occurs only after changing a parameter that actually affects the pressure (e.g. the
retained height of backfill) so it should not be too much of a hindrance when running the program.
S E I S MI C L O AD I NG
The program applies a seismic load due to the weight of the backfill based on the Mononobe-Okabe
method.
Note the pressure distribution. The theory gives two constraints: That the shape of the pressure
distribution is an inverted triangle, and that the resultant acts at 0.6H from the bottom of the wall. Since
these two conditions are mutually exclusive (resultant for a perfect triangular distribution would be at 2/3
or 0.667H from bottom) the program slightly modifies the distribution, increasing the bottom magnitude
from zero such that the resultant drops to 0.6H. This is the pressure that is used when calculating stem
moments.
WALL WEIGHTS
The wall weights are determined by dividing the wall into simple geometric pieces and calculating the
weight for each piece. Each piece’s weight (per unit length of wall) is the area of the piece multiplied by
the unit weight of the wall material.
SOIL WEIGHTS
The soil weights are determined by dividing the backfill into simple geometric pieces and calculating the
weight for each piece. Each piece’s weight (per unit length of wall) is the area of the piece multiplied by
the unit weight of the soil. This includes both the backfill behind the wall and the soil in front of the wall
over the toe. The weight of the soil over the toe can be neglected if desired.
The upward force (R) exerted by the soil against the footing is in reaction to the sum of all downward
forces that act on the wall. The calculations displayed in the software show exactly what the various
downward forces are. Note that the software also tabulates what contribution each load source (e.g. dead,
live, etc.) makes to the total bearing reaction. This information may be of general interest, and also
becomes important when factoring the bearing pressure and determining the sliding resistance due to
friction, which is a function of this bearing resultant.
The horizontal position at which R acts (dR) is determined by calculating the net moment of all the forces
on the wall and dividing by R. See the program output for sample equations. Note that for a restrained
wall the contribution of lateral forces to the overall moment is not added in directly; rather, their effect is
reflected in the moment that is transferred to the footing at the base of the stem (Mstem).
Knowing R and dR it is then possible to calculate the left and right bearing pressures () beneath the
footing. The formula used for this will vary based on whether the resultant R is located inside the middle
third (full bearing) or outside the middle third (partial bearing). Again, the best illustration of this is to
look at the program output.
FRICTION
The friction between the footing and the soil below is calculated by multiplying a user-specified
coefficient by the total bearing reaction force. This is a fairly straightforward calculation, but there are
complicating adjustments made when some portion of the bearing pressure was in reaction to certain load
sources that should not be allowed to contribute to frictional resistance. These sources are:
• Any live loads
• Applied surcharge force (vertical) – (optional based on user setting)
• Vertical component of backfill force – (optional based on user setting)
If the bearing reaction contains contributions from any of these three sources, it will be reduced for the
purposes of calculating friction. The printed report details how the calculations are adjusted to reflect this
reduction.
The program checks the wall for four different stability conditions:
• Sliding
• Overturning
• Max bearing pressure
• Bearing resultant position (eccentricity)
The forces used in making these calculations are unfactored (service loads).
S L I DI N G
For sliding, the ratio of sliding forces to resisting forces must be equal to or greater than the specified
minimum factor of safety. The following forces can contribute to sliding:
Sliding Resisting
Lateral backfill force Friction
Water pressure Passive pressure @ toe
Lateral surcharge pressure (uniform)
Lateral surcharge pressure (line/strip)
Seismic force
Manually specified lateral (e.g. wind)
It is important to note that the friction force is contributed to by all of the vertical forces, since it is a
function of the bearing resultant, so those forces contribute indirectly to sliding resistance.
O V E R T UR N I N G
For overturning, the ratio of overturning forces to resisting forces must be equal to or greater than the
specified minimum factor of safety. The following forces can contribute to overturning:
Overturning Resisting
Lateral backfill force Wall weight
Water pressure Soil weight
Lateral surcharge pressure (uniform) Vertical component of backfill pressure*
Lateral surcharge pressure (line/strip) Surcharge*
Seismic force Axial dead load
Manually specified lateral (e.g. wind) Passive pressure @ toe*
* Excludable by user
M A X I M UM B E A RI N G P R E S S U R E
The program checks that the maximum bearing pressure beneath the footing does not exceed the specified
maximum value.
Strength Checks
The heel, toe, and stem are all independently checked as separate components. No checks are performed
on the shear key.
B UI L DI NG C O D E
The program can perform concrete checks based either on the IBC 2003 / ACI 318-02 code or the
Canadian CSA A23.3-94 code. Masonry checks are always performed using the IBC 2003 / MSJC 2002
code (no Canadian code checks for masonry).
L O AD F AC T O RS
The calculated forces are factored according the load combinations mandated in the chosen building code
(either IBC 2003 or CSA A23.3-94). All pertinent combinations are checked. If custom load factors have
been specified, only a single combination containing the custom load factors will be used. The particular
combinations checked for a given project are displayed in both the summary and complete reports.
Note that when factoring the bearing pressure for heel and toe checks, the program calculates an average
load factor based on the percentage contribution of each load source to the total bearing reaction. In this
manner the bearing reaction is factored properly and also accurately maintains the shape of the pressure
distribution based on unfactored loads.
H E E L / T O E C H E CK S
The following checks are performed for the heel and toe:
• Minimum reinforcement
• Minimum tensile strain
• Shear
• Flexure
• Development
Shear, flexure, and minimum reinforcement are each checked at a single location: the critical section
where the heel or toe meets the stem. The exception to this is the shear check for the toe, which is
performed at a distance ‘d’ out from the face of the stem.
The development check ensures that the bars are properly developed back into the footing. The
reinforcement for the heel must extend far enough back into the footing to achieve development, or can be
hooked downward to the footing bottom in the event that the toe is too short for full development. The
reinforcement for the toe must extend far enough back into the footing to achieve development, or can be
hooked upward into the stem and be made continuous with the stem bars.
S T E M C H E C KS
The provisions used for the stem checks will vary based on whether the stem is concrete or masonry (or
both). The following checks are performed:
• Minimum reinforcement
• Minimum tensile strain
• Shear
• Flexure (both positive and negative for a restrained wall)
• Development
• Bar cutoffs
• Bar splices
The bar cutoff and bar splice checks may not be necessary depending on the exact configuration of the
stem (i.e., there may be no cutoffs or splices).
Minimum Reinforcement
Checks are performed at all locations at which the calculated As,min might vary (changes in section depth
or reinforcement). The detailed calculations output in the program indicates where these locations are.
No minimum reinforcement checks are performed on masonry stem sections.
Shear
Shear is checked at all locations where the capacity varies and the shear force is most critical. The
detailed calculations output in the program indicates where these locations are.
Flexure
A check is performed at a set of discrete locations that represent the places where the moment is most
extreme relative to capacity. These locations vary based on the configuration of the stem and whether or
not there is a lateral support. Visual inspection of the moment capacity diagram can confirm that the stem
passed or failed as reported.
A note about the stem moment graph: When calculating the capacity of a section that contains lapped
bars of different sizes, the capacity is linearly interpolated between the strength of the bottom bars alone
and the strength of the top bars alone.
For each point at which the capacity is calculated, both the area of steel (As) and effective depth (d) used
will be based on all of the bars present at that section to the extent that they are developed or lap spliced.
For example, the report may show something like this:
Development
The stem bars can either be hooked or will extend straight down, possibly into the shear key.
There is a possibility that the stem will be required to have moment capacity all the way to the top. This
will occur if there is an eccentric axial load applied to the top of the stem. To achieve such capacity, the
stem bars must be developed at the top of the stem. Consideration of the specific means by which this
might be done is not within the scope of the program, so to handle this situation the user is required to
check a box indicating that the bars are developed, and all output diagrams contain a note to that effect.
Bar Cutoffs
Bars must extend a distance past the point where they are needed, and bar cutoffs that occur in a tension
zone must meet certain requirements.
Bar Splices
Lap splices must be of sufficient length, and cannot exceed a certain transverse spacing.
G E NE R AL N O T E S
Note that in all cases when calculating the moment capacity of a section, tension reinforcement only is
assumed. If a scenario arises where there are bars on the opposite side of the section that lie in the
compressive region, their contribution to the flexural strength is neglected.
Note the software assumes normal weight concrete when calculating development length (lambda factor,
see ACI 12.2.4), and that the bars are not epoxy coated (beta factor).
While the software in most cases displays values in the units that have been selected by the user, in some
cases there are design equations that require input in specific units. For example, several ACI equations
have a term sqrt(f’c) that requires f’c to be in psi. In such cases the program will always display the value
in the required units, rather than those specified by the user (if they are different).
C O M P L E T E D E S I G N F U N CT I O N
The complete wall design function is governed by user parameters and tries to produce a design that both
meets the code and is practical for construction. The design algorithm operates by a trial-and-error
procedure; it guesses an initial size, then runs checks, adjusts sizes based on which checks failed, and so
on. This generally does not result in the most economic or completely practical design, so the complete
design feature is best used as a starting point, after which the engineer can make optimizations manually.
There are limitations to this function. It currently does not handle masonry stems or restrained wall
stems, and always designs concrete stems as “single-piece” (does not use the multi-piece option).
Note you can control the behavior of the complete design function to a large degree by setting
information such as preferred bar sizes and spacings in the design preferences (Design | Design
Preferences menu item).
P A R T I AL D E S I G N F U N C T I O N S
There are also several “partial” design functions. These are so named because they only affect limited
aspects of the design, and are not as liable to overwrite any previous changes like the complete design
function does. These are most useful when there are certain things you want the software to determine for
you (at least initially) and others that you want to set yourself. Current functions include:
• Choose footing reinforcement
• Choose stem reinforcement
• Position key to embed stem bars
• Set all embedment lengths
• Set all lap splice lengths
• Set bar cutoff lengths
The exact manner in which these functions operate is best described by the documentation for the
corresponding menu commands (see the Design Menu section in the Reference chapter).
The following references were consulted in preparation of this software program and its accompanying
documentation:
Bowles, Joseph E. Foundation Analysis and Design. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company,
1968.
Das, Braja M. Principles of Foundation Engineering. Boston: PWS Publishing Company, 1995.
Meza, P., et al. CRSI Handbook 1992. Schaumburg, Illinois: Concrete Reinforcing Steel
Institute, 1992.
Newman, Morton. Standard Cantilever Retaining Walls. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1976.
Ulrich, Cecil. “Designing Retaining Walls”. Structural Engineering Forum. Vol 2, Issue1.
May-June 1996: 32-35.
Wang, Chu-Kia, and Salmon, Charles G. Reinforced Concrete Design. New York: Harper
Collins Publishers, 1992.