Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syndicate 2
Dina Rizkia Rachmah (29120431)
Muhammad Ikhlas Dharma (29120398)
Desman Hansen Sagala (29120481)
01 02
Table Of Contents
Exercise 1 Exercise 2
Alternatives without probabilities Alternatives with probabilities
03 04
Case Conclusion
Case on food processing
Conclusion of the case
industry company
2
Exercise 1
01 Alternatives without probabilities
3
Exercise 1
You are given the following payoff table (in units of thousands dollars)
for a decision analysis problem without probabilities.
5
Exercise 2
02 Alternatives with probabilities
6
Exercise 2
You are given the following payoff table (in units of thousands dollars)
for a decision analysis problem.
7
Questions & Answers
8
Bayes’ Decision Rule
Alternatives EV
Max in Min in
State 1 State 2 State 3
Row Row
Bayes’ Decision Rule choose best alternative by considering entire information that being
owned by doing steps mentioned:
Choose the decision alternative that has the largest Expected Value
9
Questions & Answers (cont.)
5. Construct a decision tree by hand for this problem. 1. Decision: A1or A2
2. SON : State 1, State 2, State 3
3. Event Nodes
State 1 150 (0,1) 4. Payoff
A1 State 2 110 (0,3) EV(A1) = Sigma p(Event) * Payoff
= (0.1)*(150) + (0.3)*(110) + (0.6)*(170)
150 = 150 Expected Payoff :
State 3 170 (0,6)
= Max{EV(A1),EV(A2)}
= Max{150,210} = 210
210 State 1 180 (0,1)
10
Exercise 3
03 Alternatives without probabilities
11
An engineer who works at company of equipment for the food
processing industry has been asked to consider the
development of a new type of processor.
Case: • There are two alternative power sources could be used for the
processor, namely gas and electricity,
•There are technical reasons each power source would require
Intro
a fundamentally different design.
•Resource constraints mean that the company will only be able
to pursue one of the designs, and because the processor would
be more advanced than others which have been developed it is
by no means certain that either design would be a success.
12
The engineer estimates that there is a 75%
chance that the electricity-powered design
Case:
would be successful.
1. If success will get profit $10 M and
2. If fail then it loses $3M
13
● After considering this tree the engineer realizes that if either
design failed then the company would still consider
modifying the design, though this would involve more
investment and would still not guarantee success.
● He estimates that the probability that the electrical design
could be successfully modified is only 30%.
1.If success will get profit $6 M and
2.If fail then it loses $7M
Case: Cont.
● The probability of the gas design would have an 80%
chance of being modified successfully.
1.If success will get profit $10 M and
2.If fail then it loses $12M
14
Case: Questions
15
3rd Case
16
Answer of 3rd Case
1. Alternatives:
D1,1: Develop electric-powered design.
D1,2: Develop gas-powered design.
D1,3: Do not develop the product.
D2,1: Consider modify design of D1,1 failure
D2,2: Abandoned modify
D3,1: Consider modify design of D1,2 failure
D3,1: Abandoned modify
2. SON:
E1,1 success of D1,1 E3,1 success of D2,1
E1,2 fail of D1,1 E3,1 fail of D2,1
E2,1 success of D1,2 E4,1 success of D3,1
E2,2 fail of D1,2 E4,2 fail of D3,1
17
Answer of 3rd Case
3. Payoff/outcome
O1,1 O1,2 O2,1 O2,2 O3,1 O3,2 O4,1 O4,2
5. The optimal path is D1,2 because got the highest result. It happened by the
success of E2,1 plus the success of E4,1.
18
Conclusion
04 D1,2 is the best path because it
generated the best result. It happened
as a result of the success of E2,1
combined with the success of E4,1.
19
Thanks!
Do you have any questions?
20