You are on page 1of 2

MINUTES OF DAC MEETING OF AUDIT REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2001-2002

IN RESPECT OF RTO MULTAN


(HELD ON 13.12.2010 AT RAWALPINDI)
Loss due to wrong application of tax rate
S.# Para of Audit Name/NTN of Asstt: Amount Departmental Reply Audit Remarks DAC Directives
Report the assessee Year pointed
out by Audit

1 1.12/551 M/s. Mehmood 1999-00 162330 Audit para received on transferred from RTO Other income cannot Already reported charged
Textile Mills Ltd Lahore on 26.07.2010. be set off against and recovery awaited.
B.F.Losses
Contested. There is no provisions in the law to
assess the other income as separate block. Other
income is always included in taxpayers total
income earned from all sources by giving due
consideration to the BF Losses. The para may
kindly be considered as disposed off.

Loss due to incorrect apportioning the P&L expenses.


2 1.18/462/04 M/s Rashid 1996-97 12,085 Charged. The CIT (A) deleted the amount and Subjudice before The RTO informed that the
Multan Zone Mechanical department has filed 2nd appeal before the ITAT ITAT matter is still subjudice
Works, vide No. 8188 dated 12.03.2003 which is pending before ITAT. The DAC
for decision. Request for early hearing was made directed the RTO to intimate
on 21.01.2006, 05.10.2006 & 31.12.2007. Fresh the latest status of the case.
request has been made to Board vide this office
letter No.5027 dated 23.04.2008 to take up the
case with the appellate authority/ Court for early
hearing.
Subjudice before ITAT. Letters have been
addressed to CsIR Legal and Enforcement to
intimate the latest status of the case. Reply is
awaited.

1
Loss of revenue due to non levy of additional tax u/s 89

3 5.4/494/03 M/s Sind Bad 1993-94 to 6305318 Original assessment order has been cancelled by Subjudice before Subjudice before High Court
Multan Zone Hotel 1998-99 the CIT(A) and upheld by the ITAT. Filing of High Court
reference was not permitted by the ITAT for want of
question of law. However, reference has been
made to High Court which is pending for decision.
A request for early hearing has been made on
05.10.2006 & 31.12.007. Fresh request has been
made to Board vide this office letter No.5027 dated
23.04.2008 to take up the case with the appellate
authority/ Court for early hearing.

Latest compliance 14.06.2010


Request for early hearing has been made vide this
office letter No.7295 dated 01.04.2009 through
Legal Advisors.
Reminder has been issued vide No.318 dated
07.09.2009. Decision is awaited.

The RTO informed that the matter is still subjudice


before High Court. The DAC directed the RTO to
intimate the latest status of the case.

Loss of revenue due to non imposition of penalty u/s 111.


4 7.2/492/03 M/s Sind Bad 1993-94 to 24,662,947 Original assessment order has been cancelled by Subjudice before Still subjudice before High
Multan Zone Hotel 1996-97 the CIT(A) and upheld by the ITAT. Filing of High Court Court
reference was not permitted by the ITAT for want of
question of law. However, reference has been
made to High Court which is pending. A request for
early hearing has been made on 05.10.2006 and
31.12.2007. Fresh request has been made to
Board vide this office letter No.5027 dated
23.04.2008 to take up the case with the appellate
authority/ Court for early hearing.
Latest compliance 14.06.2010
Request for early hearing has been made vide this
office letter No.7295 dated 01.04.2009 through Legal
Advisors.
Reminder has been issued vide No.318 dated
07.09.2009. Decision is awaited.
The RTO informed that the matter is still subjudice
before High Court. The DAC directed the RTO to
intimate the latest status of the case.

You might also like