An

gar
a v.
Ele
ctor
al
Co
mm
issi
on

In
the
elec
tion
s of
Sep
t
17,
193
5,
An
gar
a,
and
the
resp
ond
ents
,
Ped
ro
Yns
ua
et
al.
wer
e
can
did
ates
vot
ed
for
the
posi
tion
of
me
mb
er
of
the
Nat
ion
al
Ass
em
bly
for
the
first
dist
rict
of
the
Pro
vin
ce
of
Tay
aba
s.
On
Oct
7,
193
5,
An
gar
a
was
pro
clai
me
d as
me
mb
er-
elec
t of
the
NA
for
the
said
dist
rict.
On
No
ve
mb
er
15,
193
5,
he
too
k
his
oat
h of
offi
ce.
On
Dec
3,
193
5,
the
NA
in
sess
ion
asse
mbl
ed,
pas
sed
Res
olut
ion
No.
8
con
fir
min
g
the
elec
tion
of
the
me
mb
ers
of
the
Nat
ion
al
Ass
em
bly
agai
nst
wh
om
no
prot
est
had
thus
far
bee
n
file
d.
On
Dec
8,
193
5,
Yns
ua,
file
d
bef
ore
the
Ele
ctor
al
Co
mm
issi
on a
“M
otio
n of
Prot
est”
agai
nst
the
elec
tion
of
An
gar
a.
On
Dec
9,
193
5,
the
EC
ado
pte
da
reso
luti
on,
par.
6 of
whi
ch
fixe
d
said
date
as
the
last
day
for
the
filin
g of
prot
ests
agai
nst
the
elec
tion
,
retu
rns
and
qua
lific
atio
ns
of
me
mb
ers
of
the
NA,
not
wit
hsta
ndi
ng
the
pre
vio
us
con
fir
mat
ion
ma
de
by
the
NA.
An
gar
a
file
da
Mot
ion
to
Dis
mis
s
arg
uin
g
that
by
virt
ue
of
the
NA
pro
cla
mat
ion,
Yns
ua
can
no
lon
ger
prot
est.
Yns
ua
arg
ued
bac
k
by
clai
min
g
that
EC
pro
cla
mat
ion
gov
erns
and
that
the
EC
can
take
cog
niza
nce
of
the
elec
tion
prot
est
and
that
the
EC
can
not
be
subj
ect
to a
writ
of
pro
hibi
tion
fro
m
the
SC.

ISS
UE
S:
Wh
ethe
r or
not
the
SC
has
juri
sdic
tion
ove
r
suc
h
mat
ter.
Wh
ethe
r or
not
EC
acte
d
wit
hou
t or
in
exc
ess
of
juri
sdic
tion
in
taki
ng
cog
niza
nce
of
the
elec
tion
prot
est.

HE
LD:
Peti
tion
DE
NIE
D.
The
EL
CO
M
acte
d
wit
hin
its
con
stit
utio
nal
gra
nt
in
taki
ng
cog
niza
nce
of
Yns
ua's
prot
est.

The
SC
em
pha
size
d
that
in
cas
es
of
con
flict
bet
wee
n
the
sev
eral
dep
art
me
nts
and
am
ong
the
age
ncie
s
ther
eof,
the
judi
ciar
y,
wit
h
the
SC
as
the
fina
l
arbi
ter,
is
the
onl
y
con
stit
utio
nal
mec
han
ism
dev
ised
fina
lly
to
reso
lve
the
con
flict
and
allo
cate
con
stit
utio
nal
bou
nda
ries.

Tha
t
judi
cial
sup
rem
acy
is
but
the
po
wer
of
judi
cial
revi
ew
in
actu
al
and
app
ropr
iate
cas
es
and
con
trov
ersi
es,
and
is
the
po
wer
and
dut
y to
see
that
no
one
bra
nch
or
age
ncy
of
the
gov
ern
me
nt
tran
sce
nds
the
Con
stit
utio
n,
whi
ch
is
the
sou
rce
of
all
aut
hori
ty.
Tha
t
the
Ele
ctor
al
Co
mm
issi
on
is
an
ind
epe
nde
nt
con
stit
utio
nal
crea
tion
wit
h
spe
cifi
c
po
wer
s
and
fun
ctio
ns
to
exe
cute
and
perf
orm
,
clos
er
for
pur
pos
es
of
clas
sifi
cati
on
to
the
legi
slati
ve
tha
n to
any
of
the
oth
er
two
dep
art
me
nts
of
the
gov
ern
me
nt.
Tha
t
the
Ele
ctor
al
Co
mm
issi
on
is
the
sole
jud
ge
of
all
con
test
s
rela
ting
to
the
elec
tion
,
retu
rns
and
qua
lific
atio
ns
of
me
mb
ers
of
the
Nat
ion
al
Ass
em
bly.