You are on page 1of 5

Articles 8/14/06 1:25 PM Page 1209

Obesity Surgery, 16, 1209-1213

Rhabdomyolysis after Gastric Bypass: Severity and


Outcome Patterns

Joel Faintuch, MD, PhD1; Roberto de Cleva, MD2; Denis Pajecki, MD3;
Arthur B. Garrido Jr, MD4; Ivan Cecconello, MD5

1
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery; 2Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Department of
Gastroenterology; 3Outpatient Clinic of Obesity Surgery Group; 4Chief, Obesity Surgery Group;
5Professor and Chief, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas and São Paulo

University Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil

Background: Rhabdomyolysis (RML) is a recently rec- Key words: Rhabdomyolysis, morbid obesity, bariatric sur-
ognized complication of bariatric operations, but it is gery, gastric bypass, renal failure, hemodialysis
not known whether creatine kinase (CK) levels along
with clinical markers are able to define the course and
outcome.
Methods: Bariatric patients (n=324) were reviewed Introduction
retrospectively. Substantially elevated plasma CK
after operation was identified in 4.9% (16/324). The
affected population was divided into Group I (n=11, Rhabdomyolysis (RML) is an unusual but well-
68.8%) with CK 1050-8000 IU/L and no conspicuous demonstrated complication of bariatric operations.
muscle pain, weakness or swelling, and Group II (n=5, RML is associated with multiple technical modali-
31.2%) displaying CK >8000 IU/L and severe pain and
ties, from restrictive to malabsorptive and mixed
dysfunction. The main outcome measures were CK
concentration, frequency of renal failure, need for operations, equally involving open and laparoscopic
hemodialysis and mortality. approaches.1-6 Obese subjects but also those with
Results: Group I subjects compared to Group II were normal weight are vulnerable to the same compli-
younger (37.7 ± 10.9 vs 44.0 ± 5.5 years, P<0.05) and cation when undegoing other prolonged operations
predominantly females (72.7% vs 40.0%, P<0.05). Peak
or when awkward or uncomfortable positions are
CK values were definitely lower (2811 ± 952 vs 28136 ±
19000 IU/L, P<0.001), and none progressed to renal required.7-13 The pathophysiology of RML has been
failure (0% vs 40.0%, P<0.05). No difference was detect- studied extensively, especially because of diverse
ed regarding preoperative BMI (50.8 ± 8.1 vs 54.6 ± 7.0 and convenient experimental models,14-16 and
kg/m2, NS), duration of operation (5.3 ± 1.6 vs 5.6 ± 2.1 includes both local and systemic triggers.
hours, NS) or types of anesthetic drugs (basically fen- From the surgical point of view, prolonged immo-
tanyl, nitrogen oxide and halothane/isoflurane).
Conclusions: 1) Demographic features, nominally
bilization, ischemia, acidosis, crushing injury and
gender and age, were different between the two compartment syndrome tend to be the most relevant
degrees of RML; 2) Renal failure and hemodialysis phenomena. Nevertheless, just localized pressure
were a danger only in patients with massive CK ele- over muscle groups of the shoulders, back, buttocks
vation and muscle pain; 3) Moderate CK increase was and lower limbs, generated during several hours by
very well tolerated and rarely entailed major clinical
gravity forcing a massive body against an unyield-
symptoms; 4) Early diagnosis, fluid replenishment
and general supportive therapy probably contributed ing surgical table, may be sufficient for damage of
to avert mortality. muscle sarcolemma and leakage of intracellular
content into the circulatory system.1,2,6,17,18
Reprint requests to: Joel Faintuch, MD, PhD, Hospital das
Clinicas, Haddock Lobo 180/ 111, São Paulo, SP 01414-000,
Despite a long and respectable history19,20 and
Brazil. Fax: (5511) 30697560; e-mail: faintuch@net.ipen.br extensive international experience,17,18 not all ques-

© FD-Communications Inc. Obesity Surgery, 16, 2006 1209


Articles 8/14/06 1:25 PM Page 1210

Faintuch et al

tions concerning the course and complications of males and 173 IU/L for females. For the purposes of
RML have been answered. The main uncertainties this study, RML was defined as a CK >1050 IU/L.6
concern frequency in bariatric candidates where Exclusions: There were no exclusions in this pro-
clinical studies are fairly scarce, and notably prog- tocol, as the listed criteria are similar to those
nostic interpretation of CK findings. employed for bariatric surgery itself.
In a retrospective study with a homogeneous popu- Stratification: Patients were stratified according to
lation submitted to a single operative technique, find- muscle pain, swelling and dysfunction, as well as to
ings concerning frequency, severity and outcome were peak serum CK value, in Group I (n = 11) with tran-
analyzed, aiming to assess prognostic value of CK sient or inconspicuous pain and CK <8000 IU/L
concentration, renal complications, and mortality. (minor rhabdomyolysis), and Group II (n= 5) with
severe shoulder, back or buttock pain, swelling and
weakness and CK >8000 IU/L (extensive RML).11, 21
Surgical Technique: Open RYGBP involved the cre-
Methods ation of a gastric pouch of approximately 30 ml, a
Roux-en-Y jejunal limb of 100 cm, and a biliopan-
Experimental Design
creatic limb of 60-80 cm. Drainage was routinely pro-
This was a retrospective observational cohort study vided. Operations were performed by residents under
with patients of the Obesity Surgery Group of the guidance of senior members of the surgical staff.22
Hospital das Clínicas of São Paulo. All bariatric Anesthetic Interventions: Premedication was done
subjects treated during a 84-month period (February with a diazepam preparation. Anesthesia was usually
1999-February 2006) (n=324) were retrospectively induced with fentanyl, and muscular relaxation was
screened for postoperative CK aberrations and sub- achieved with atracurium. Then, the trachea was intu-
sequent clinical events. bated, and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane
Criteria for Inclusion: Male or female patients or halothane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen.
(18-70 years), submitted to open Roux-en-Y gastric Postoperative analgesia was performed with dipy-
bypass (RYGBP), with or without associated proce- rone, toradol or morphine, depending on complaints.
dures (cholecystectomy, hernia repair, liver biopsy, Postoperative Monitoring: CK assessment was
etc), were investigated in this study. not obligatory, and measurements were requested
Criteria for Exclusion: Excluded were patients based on suggestive cardiac or peripheral muscular
with alcohol abuse, myopathy, malignant hyperther- abnormalities. All CK determinations were accom-
mia, seizures , renal disease, any hospitalization for panied by estimation of CK isoenzyme MB fraction,
major surgery, trauma, myocardial infarction or troponin and electrocardiographic monitoring, in
other ischemic episodes in the last 30 days, incom- order to exclude myocardial infarction.
plete medical chart, or lack of CK measurements Perioperative Prophylaxis: Padding of the surgi-
confirming the diagnosis of RML. cal table was not a routine in this series, nor was any
special fluid or mannitol protocol employed during
Methods the operation. However, if RML was suspected and
elevated CK was confirmed after surgery, continu-
Documented variables included demographic infor- ous intravenous hydration and alkalinization with
mation, anthropometrics (body mass index, BMI), sodium bicarbonate was started, and osmotic or
general biochemical determinations, serum creatine tubular diuretics were complemented if oliguria
kinase (CK), surgical and anesthetic routine, renal ensued, until normalization of enzyme levels.
complications, specific therapeutic assistance (flu- Statistical Analysis: Numerical findings are
ids and electrolytes, medications) and clinical shown as mean ± SD. Comparison between the
course during hospitalization. groups was done by Student’s t-test and Mann-
Serum CK was measured by immunoenzymofluo- Whitney test, as appropriate, whereas qualitative
rimetric technique, using commercial kits and a variables were submitted to Chi-square analysis
Hitachi 747 Analyser (Roche Diagnostics, São Paulo, with Yates correction or Fischer exact test. A signif-
Brazil). The upper limit of normal was 204 IU/L for icance level of P<0.05 was selected.

1210 Obesity Surgery, 16, 2006


Articles 8/14/06 1:25 PM Page 1211

Rhabdomyolysis: Severity and Outcome Patterns

Results Table 4. Clinical outcome

Variable Group I Group II Significance


The entire group of 324 subjects was retrospective-
ly screened for postoperative manifestations of Post-op stay 7.0 ± 6.9 9.8 ± 4.2 NS
RML, including acute renal failure or hemodialysis, (days) (4-25) (4-15)
but only 129 (39.8%) had been evaluated with Renal failure 0 40.0% (2/5) P<0.05
Hemodialysis 0* 40.0% (2/5) P<0.05
serum CK after operation. Sixteen patients were Mortality 0 0 NS
diagnosed with RML (4.9% of the total population,
or 12.9% of those with CK evaluation). These were * One patient with arterial hypertension and chronic
divided as 11 minor and 5 major forms. Principal atrial fibrillation was managed by 48 hours of ultrafiltra-
tion for lung edema in the course of postoperative inten-
findings are shown in Tables 1-4.
sive hydration. Her peak CK was only 2.8 mg/dL.
Cases of both minor and major RML received
intravenous hydration and alkalinization with sodi-
um bicarbonate. No patient progressed to compart- ment syndrome or muscle necrosis; thus, decom-
pression maneuvers and surgical debridement were
Table 1. Demographic and general features not necessary. Also, in these patients, no mortality
or sequelae resulted.
Variable Group I Group II Significance

Age(years) 37.7±10.9 44.0±5.5 P<0.05


(34-62) (38-52) Discussion
Gender
(Male/Female) 8F/ 3M 3M/ 2F P<0.05
BMI (kg/m2) 50.8 ± 8.1 54.6 ± 7.0 NS Rhabdomyolysis (RML) after elective surgery is not
(42.1-70.0) (46.6-66.7) a frequent complication. Nevertheless, it occurs more
than generally imagined, because episodes are dis-
Operations: Open RYGBP
persed among many settings and specialties. More
than 50 diseases and conditions can be associated
with this complication, besides dozens of drugs and
Table 2. Principal co-morbidities
assorted herbs.17,18 RML has been estimated to
Variable Group I Group II Significance account for 3-15% of all cases of acute renal failure.16
Predominance of RML in males was noticed some
Arterial 54.5% 60.0% NS years ago, probably because of the larger muscle
hypertension (6/11) ( 3/5)
mass,2,3,17,23 and this association was found here
Diabetes 18.2% 20.0% NS
mellitus (2/11) (1/5) with regard to major RML, but not in the less
Sleep apnea 9.1% 20.0% NS aggressive category.
(1/11) (1/5) Massive BMI1,3,6 as well as operations of long dura-
Hyperlipidemia 9.1% 20.0% NS tion2,3,5,22 are also classical detrimental conditions. In
(1/11) (1/5) this study, no difference could be demonstrated for
these variables, but it must be recognized that all sub-
Table 3. General and biochemical findings jects displayed mean BMI in the range of super-obe-
sity, and suffered very lengthy interventions.23
Variable Group I Group II Significance Minor RML (Group I) did not feature a different
profile from the major alternative. These patients
Operating time 5.3 ± 1.6 5.6 ± 2.1 NS
(hours) (4.5-9.0) (4.0-9.5)
were as severely obese as those in Group II, displayed
Peak serum 2811 ± 952 28136 ± 19000 P<0.001 equivalent co-morbidities and underwent equally pro-
CK (IU/L) (1117-5174) (8754-55010) longed operations. Yet muscle pain and weakness
Day of peak 1.6 ± 1.2 1.4 ± 0.8 NS were virtually absent, kidney function remained
CK (1-4) (1-4) almost undamaged, and outcome was favorable.

Obesity Surgery, 16, 2006 1211


Articles 8/14/06 1:25 PM Page 1212

Faintuch et al

The only significant complication in Group I was also on pain manifestations. RML followed by
one case of lung edema requiring ultrafiltration for relentless pain and functional impairment is consis-
48 hours, in a patient with previous moderate heart tent with either extensive cellular necrosis, massive
troubles (Table 4). In retrospect, intravenous hydra- swelling or a compartment syndrome, which signal
tion because of CK elevation should have proceed- high-risk situations.8,13,21,22
ed more slowly in this patient.
A consensus exists that elevations of CK below
five times the upper limit of normal (<5 ULN) are
mostly irrelevant, because drugs, surgical and anes- Conclusions
thetic manipulations, muscle incisions and multiple
other mechanisms may be responsible for such 1) Male gender and older age were associated with
oscillations6,17,21,22 CK >10 ULN may be induced by higher risk for severe RML. 2) Renal failure was a
statins and other lipid-lowering drugs in proportions danger only in patients with massive CK elevation. 3)
of <0.1% of treated patients.24 Uncertainties center Moderate CK increase was very well tolerated and
around chances of progression to full-fledged RML, rarely entailed major clinical symptoms. 4) Early
and the corresponding CK threshold.25 diagnosis, fluid replenishment and general supportive
In the current report, dialysis was mandatory on therapy probably contributed to avert mortality. 5)
two occasions of major RML. Other patients with Classification of RML according to both pain and CK
massive CK elevation suffered little nephrologic level is suggested, because of its prognostic value.
compromise as well as no mortality, thus reinforc-
ing the message that attention to CK determination
whenever suggestive symptoms arise, and appropri-
ate and timely intervention, are the mainstays of References
therapeutic success.1-6,11
Less prolonged operations are always advisable 1. Torres-Villalobos G, Kimura E et al. Pressure-induced
despite lack of statistical differences in this study, rhabdomyolysis after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg.
because both current groups remained for many 2003; 13: 297-301.
hours on the operating table.2,3,5,22 2. Khurana RN, Baudendistel TE, Morgan EF et al.
One unproven prophylactic measure that is inex- Postoperative rhabdomyolysis following laparoscopic
gastric bypass in the morbidly obese. Arch Surg 2004;
pensive and harmless, is generous padding.26
139: 73-6.
Nowadays, surgical tables for patients who weigh 3. Bostanjian D, Anthone GJ, Hamoui N et al.
>300 kg can easily be purchased on the internation- Rhabdomyolysis of gluteal muscles leading to renal
al market, and most models and brands are updating failure: a potentially fatal complication of surgery in
the mattress, that typically had a thickness of 5 cm the morbidly obese. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 302-5.
(two inches).2,13 It is our belief that more substantial 4. Anthone GJ, Lord RVN, DeMeester TR et al The duo-
physical protection of the patient, with a cushion denal switch operation for the treatment of morbid
three times as thick, would considerably reduce the obesity. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 618-28.
incidence of RML in the obese population. 5. Collier B, Goreja MA, Duke BE 3rd. Postoperative
It is debated as to whether CK measurements are rhabdomyolysis with bariatric surgery. Obes Surg
mandatory after bariatric interventions.3,18 As large 2003; 13: 941-3.
population studies are not available, and some expe- 6. Mognol P, Vignes S, Chosidow D et al.
Rhabdomyolysis after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
rienced services have not observed a case of RML,
Obes Surg 2004; 14: 91-4.
the cost/benefit ratio would seem unfavorable. In
7. Cone AM, Schneider M. Massive rhabdomyolysis
Hospital das Clinicas, the CK test was recently adopt- following cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Intensive
ed as routine, because the current study indicated that Care 1995; 23: 721-4.
the risk for this complication was not negligible. 8. Ferreira TA, Pensado A, Dominguez L et al.
The most important concept generated by this Compartment syndrome with severe rhabdomyolysis
protocol is the classification of dangerous versus in the post-operative period following major vascular
minor syndromes based not only on CK values but surgery. Anesthesia 1996; 51: 692-4.

1212 Obesity Surgery, 16, 2006


Articles 8/14/06 1:25 PM Page 1213

Rhabdomyolysis: Severity and Outcome Patterns

9. Biswas S, Gnanasekaran I, Ivatury RR et al. Exp Clin Pharmacol 2005; 27: 39-48.
Exaggerated lithotomy position-related rhabdomyoly- 19.Meyer-Betz F. Beobachtungen an einem
sis. Am Surg 1997; 63: 361-4. Eigentartigen mit Muskellahmungen verbunden fall
10.Lachiewicz PF, Latimer HA. Rhabdomyolysis follow- von Haemoglobinurie (Observations on an unique
ing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; case of hemoglobinuria associated with muscle
73: 576-9. injury). Dtsch Arch Klin 1911; 101: 5.
11.Choufane S, Lemogne M, Jacob L. Unexpected rhab- 20.Bywaters EGL, Beall D. Crush injuries with impair-
domyolysis with myoglobinuria in a patient in the ment of renal function. BMJ 1941; 1: 427-34
supine position. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 493-6. 21.Bertrand, M, Godet G, Fleron MH et al. Lumbar mus-
12.Hofmann R, Stroller ML. Endoscopic and open sur- cle rhabdomyolysis after abdominal aortic surgery .
gery in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 1992; 148: Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 11-5.
1108-11. 22.Hiratsuka Y, Ishii T, Takeuchi F et al. Risk of elevat-
13.Iseri C, Senkul T, Reddy PK. Major urologic surgery ed creatine kinase and myoglobulinemia due to
and rhabdomyolysis in two obese patients. Int J Urol incised muscles in patients who underwent urological
surgery. J Urol 2003; 170: 119-21.
2003; 10: 558-60
23.Stroh C, Hohman U, Remmler K et al. Rhabdo-
14. Perri G, Gorini P. Uremia in the rabbit after injection of
myolysis after biliopancreatic diversion with duode-
crystaline myoglobin. Br J Exp Path 1952; 33: 440-4.
nal switch. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1347-51.
15.Fernandez-Funez A, Polo FJ, Broseta L et al. Effects
24.Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group.
of N-acetylcysteine on myoglobinuric-acute renal
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol low-
failure in rats. Ren Fail 2002; 24: 725-33.
ering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals:
16.Chander V, Singh D, Chopra K. Reversal of experi- a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;
mental myoglobinuric acute renal failure in rats by 360 (9326): 7-22.
quercetin, a bioflavonoid. Pharmacology 2005; 73: 25.Wortmann RL. Lipid-lowering agents and myopathy
49-56. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002; 14: 643-7.
17.Meijer ARD, Fikkers BG, Keijzer MHD et al. Serum 26.Ettinger JEMTM, Filho PVS, Azaro E et al.
creatine kinase as predictor of clinical course in rhab- Prevention of rhabdomyolysis in bariatric surgery.
domyolysis: a 5-year intensive care survey. Intensive Obes Surg 2005; 15: 874-9.
Care Med 2003; 7: 1121-5.
18.Singh D, Chander V, Chopra K. Rhabdomyolysis. (Received February 14, 2006; accepted April 19, 2006)

Obesity Surgery, 16, 2006 1213

You might also like