Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/307558041
Lev Vygotsky
CITATIONS READS
0 4,879
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jeremy Sawyer on 01 September 2016.
Vygotsky's views on language are embedded within his broader dialectical theory of
human development and can be interpreted in its light. The overall approach he took
was to understand mind and language not as separate faculties of isolated individuals
acting in a vacuum but instead as developing out of human engagements in the world,
saturated with culture and social interactions, to serve the purposes of participating in
communal life. The underlying rationale was to dialectically bridge the traditional
divides—especially between material versus mental activities and between collective
versus individual processes—by revealing their developmental continuity and common
grounding in social, collaborative activities (i.e., human culture) while focusing on the
uniqueness of the human mind and cognition. It is in explaining what is unique about the
human mind and consciousness that the topic of language and speech becomes
central.
Speech, a new part of collaborative practical activity, helped to modify, regulate, and
direct that activity. In much the same way that physical tools and instruments mediated
objective human activity, the gestures and vocalizations that accompanied social labor
also came to mediate this ongoing activity, as well as the relations among its
participants. While physical instruments produced changes in objects in the external
environment, the use of speech and signs produced changes in the behavior of others
and oneself. This systematic and widespread use of physical and psychological
instruments in a social labor process, gradually expanding in history, was the objective
force that gave rise to human consciousness.
For Vygotsky, the use of signs and language to communicate with others in the course
of practical activities in the form of interpsychological processes gradually engenders
intrapsychological processes. As Vygotsky put it, a sign is always originally a means
used for social purposes, a means of influencing others, and only later becomes a
means of influencing oneself. While some tools aimed directly at transforming the
physical world, psychological tools like language quintessentially aimed at transforming
social and psychological processes (and ultimately material reality as well).
Vygotsky took the increasingly complex social relations generated by labor and its
instruments to be the foundation of human consciousness. Vygotsky summed his
position by paraphrasing Marx's sixth thesis on Ludwig Feuerbach: “The psychological
nature of man is an aggregate of social relations transferred within and becoming
functions of the personality, the dynamic parts of its structure.” Signs, language, and
speech appear first in shared, external form and are then internalized by individuals.
For Vygotsky, the internalization process is formative of psychological processes in
both human cultural history and the ontogenic development of each individual. These
ideas were summed up in what Vygotsky termed the general law of development of
higher mental functions, according to which “these functions arise as forms of
cooperative activity. Only later are they transformed by the child into the sphere of his
own mental activity.”
Vygotsky proposed that thinking and speech, though highly integrated in their mature
forms, have different origins and trajectories of development. Prelinguistic or nonverbal
thought develops from infants' active sensory-motor problem-solving activity. For
Vygotsky, while there is a prelinguistic phase in the development of thought and a pre-
intellectual phase in the development of speech (e.g., babbling), nonverbal thinking and
speech merge in social activity during the second or third year of life. As the child
develops meaningful words, thinking and speech merge together, whereby thought
becomes verbal and speech becomes rational. This new tool of verbal thinking
ultimately leads to development of abstract, theoretical thought and conceptual
reasoning, which are powerful tools for understanding and transforming the world.
Vygotsky saw language as the most important psychological tool developed in human
history, not only because it reorganizes the mind, engendering verbal thinking and
creating new systemic qualities, but because it also leads to the central characteristic
of the human personality: self-regulated and goal-directed voluntary activity (also
termed will). Vygotsky outlined the internalization of language and the development of
volition as proceeding through three main ontogenetic stages: social speech,
egocentric speech, and inner speech. As a child develops social speech, he or she
comes to use words with increasing effectiveness, without necessarily at first
understanding their semantic denotation. Words initially merely aid in shared activity
(labeling, requesting adult help, etc.), with language entirely directed toward others.
Egocentric speech is a transitional phase in which social speech becomes self-
directed, organizing and directing one's own activity in the same ways that adults
previously directed the child. Instead of appealing to adults for help, the child essentially
appeals to him- or herself. Gradually, what the child has been capable of doing together
with others can now be done by the child independently; functions shared between
people become functional systems that can be actively applied by the child in his or her
own activities and practical pursuits. Vygotsky observed that children transition from
solving practical tasks with their hands and eyes to solving them with the help of their
speech. During the age interval of roughly 3 to 7 years, egocentric speech changes in
form, becoming further differentiated from social speech until it becomes silent, inner
speech, which precedes and regulates activity and is used for thinking and planning
intentional action.
Conclusion
• speech (language)
• language development
• egocentrism
• theories of human development
• social activities
• human development
• shared activities
Jeremy E. Sawyer
Anna Stetsenko The Graduate Center, City University of New York
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346441.n211
See Also:
• Bruner, Jerome
• Cultural Learning
• Interrelationship of Language and Cognitive Development (Overview)
• Joint Attention in Language Development
• Literacy Effects on Cognitive Development
• Parental Responsiveness and Scaffolding of Language Development
• Private Speech/Inner Speech
• Social Foundations of Communicative Development
Further Readings
John-Steiner, V., C. P. Panofsky, and L. W. Smith, eds. Sociocultural Approaches to
Language and Literacy: An Interactionist Perspective. New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897047
Lantolf, J. and S. Thorne. Sociocultural Approach to Second Language Learning. New
York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.