You are on page 1of 4

Finite Element Simulation of Drill Bit and Bone

Thermal Contact During Drilling

Yuan-Kun Tu Hsun-Heng Tsai


Director, Department of Orthopedics Department of Biomechatronic Engineering
E-Da Hospital and I-Shou University National Pingtung University of Science and Technology
Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan Pingtung, Taiwan
ed100130@edah.org.tw heng@mail.npust.edu.tw

Li-Wen Chen, Ching-Chieh Huang and Yung-Chuan Chen* Li-Chiang Lin


Department of Vehicle Engineering Director, Department of Biomedical
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology E-Da Hospital and I-Shou University
Pingtung, Taiwan Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan
chuan@mail.npust.edu.tw (*corresponding author) ed100004@edah.org.tw

Abstract— Drilling is an essential part of internal fixation in results explored by Bachus et al. [3] also showed that by the
orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The temperature rise during application of a larger force to the drill, both maximum cortical
bone drilling is an important index to the damage of bone. In this temperatures and their duration above 50 oC might be
study, an elastic-plastic dynamic finite element model is used to
effectively reduced. Allan et al. [4] reported that the
simulate the process of a drill bit drilling through the bone.
Various initial temperatures of drill bit are investigated to
temperature rise of drilling bone was related to the amount of
explore the effects of this parameter on the temperature rise and drill wear. In addition, the finite element method is a useful
on the contact stress distribution of the bone during drilling. The tool to simulate the drilling process [5, 6]. For example,
results indicate that a drill bit with a lower initial temperature Davidson and James [5] developed thermo-mechanical
can reduce the temperature rise in bone during drilling. A equations to predict heat generation due to drilling and were
relationship between the initial temperature of drill bit and coupled with a heat transfer finite element simulation to predict
temperature rise is proposed. the temperature rise in bone during drilling. It was found that
the drill speed, feed rate and drill diameter had the most
Keywords-drill bit; bone; thermal contact; dynamic finite significant thermal impact while changes in drill helix angle,
element model. point angle and bone thermal properties had relatively little
effect.
I. INTRODUCTION Although various studies have addressed the influence of
A general concern in using surgical drills is the thermal drilling on bone, these literatures contain only limited
damage to the bone. The drills are often driven into the bone information on the simulation of temperature rise and contact
using electrical power. The heat generated during bone drilling stress in drill-bit-bone contact problems during drilling. In this
is proportional to the drilling speed. Heat generation is a study, an elastic-plastic dynamic finite element model is used
particularly important problem because heat is hard to be to simulate the temperature rise in the bone during drilling.
conducted away during bone drilling and the bone is very Various initial temperatures of drill bit are investigated to
sensitive to and may be damaged by heat. A literature showed explore the effects of the parameter on the temperature rise and
that if the temperature rises above 55 oC for a period longer the contact stress distribution of bone during drilling, because
than 30 seconds, it will cause great damage to the bone [1]. the temperature of the drill bit may be still high after a high-
temperature aseptic process.
Hillery and Shuaib [1] studied the temperature effects in the
drilling of human and bovine bone. The results indicated that II. FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
drilling speeds of 800-1400 rpm were suggested when drilling
with a diameter of 3.2 mm drill bit to provide the best cutting In this study, an elastic-plastic three-dimensional dynamic
condition and maintaining temperature at a manageable level. temperature-displacement finite element model is used to
Mustafa et al. [2] investigated the effect of force on drill speed simulate the process of a drill bit drilling through the bone. The
and measured the energy consumed during the drilling process. simulations are performed using the commercial finite element
The results indicated that heat generation decreased as drill package ABAQUS and the dynamic failure criterion is applied
speed and force increased, primarily because of decreased to control the element removal. Figure 1 shows the geometrical
drilling time. The results suggested that drilling at high speed configuration of the drill bit and the bone contact model. The
and with a large force could reduce the bone temperature. The diameter, point angle and helix angle of the drill bit used in this

978-1-4244-1748-3/08/$25.00 © 2008 IEEE 1268


Table I. Mechanical properties of drill bit and bone used in finite element
model

 Drill bit Bone [7,8]


3
Density (Kg/m ) 7840 1700

Young’s modulus (GPa) 210 13.8

Yielding strength (MPa) 608 85

Tensile strength (MPa) 1000 90

Specific heat (J/Kgഒ ) 490 1260

Poisson’s ratio 0.3 0.35

Conductivity (Watt/mഒ ) 47.7 0.38

Fig. 1. Geometrical configuration and finite element model of the drill bit and 60
the bone contact model
Z = 1mm T o= 30¢J
study are taken as 4 mm, 118 o and 30 o , respectively. The 55 900 RPM T o= 35¢J
region of interest is the immediate surroundings of the drill T o= 40¢J
hole. In which place, the temperature is the highest, and the 50 T o= 67¢J
domain for the numerical simulation is chosen as a circular
disc. The diameter and the thickness of the bone are taken as 14 45
mm and 4 mm, respectively. The corresponding finite element
model is shown in Fig. 1. The contact behavior between the 40
drill bit and the bone is modeled using approximately 14811
contact elements in each simulation. The mesh is constructed 35
using eight-node three-dimensional brick elements. The finite
element model comprises a total of 42240 elements and 45738 30
nodes. To explore the effects of initial temperature of drill bit 0 2 4 6 8 10
on the temperature rise and contact stress distribution, the Drill Time (s)
simulations are performed using four initial temperature To , i.e. Fig. 2. Variation in temperature with the drill time for various initial
temperatures of drill bit at depth z= 0mm
30, 35, 40 and 67 oC . The drilling speed and the applied force
are taken as 900 rpm and 100 N, respectively. The initial
The result of To =30 oC indicates that the temperature of the
temperature of the bone is assumed as 35 oC . The mechanical
properties used in the finite element analysis are summarized in bone is reduced initially, and, as the drilling time increases,
Table 1. The initial contact point of the drill bit and the bone, the temperature is slowly increased to the temperature of
as shown in Fig. 1, is taken as the origin of the coordinate 35 oC . This can be attributed to that the contact frictional heat
system. created during drilling is absorbed by the drill bit.
Figure 3 shows the contours of the temperature distribution
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS in the bone for the drill bit with an initial temperature of 30 oC
In the followings, all the results are taken from the position and a drilling time of 4.4 sec. The results shown in Fig. 3
of x=2 and y=0 mm, as shown in Fig. 1. Figure 2 plots the indicate that the temperature near the center region is lower
variation in the temperature of bone vs. the drilling time for than the temperature at the surroundings because the drill bit
four different initial temperatures of drill bit. The point has a lower initial temperature. Figure 4 shows the variation in
discussed is at z= 1 mm, i.e. at the bone surface. The profile of the temperature of the bone at depth z= 3 mm for four different
the temperature distribution is similar to the experimental initial temperatures of the drill bit. At this depth, the drill bit is
just drilling through the bone shell. Compare with Fig. 2, it can
results proposed by [9]. The results indicate that a drill bit
be seen that the temperature in the bone at depth of z= 3 mm is
with a higher initial temperature results in a higher
higher than the results shown in Fig. 2. The maximum
temperature rise in the bone. The temperature at the bone can
temperature is about 60 oC . Summarizing the above simulation
reach 55 oC when the drill bit has an initial temperature of results, the relationship between the maximum temperature in
67 oC . This may cause great damage to the bone. It also can the bone and the initial temperature of the drill bit is presented
be seen that the temperature of the bone can be reduced about in Fig. 5. Figure 5 shows that the temperature of the bone, T,
2 oC during drilling if the drill bit has an initial temperature presents approximately linear dependence on the initial
temperature of the drill bit, To . In this study, this relationship
of 30 oC .
can be approximated as the following equation:

1269
(a) To =30 o
C

Fig. 3. Contours of the temperature distribution in the bone

60
(b) To =67 o
C
55 Fig. 6. von-Mises stress distribution in bone during drilling for a drill bit with
T o= 30 ¢J
T o= 35 ¢J different initial temperature
50 T o= 40 ¢J
T o= 67 ¢J T = 0.694 To + 12.67 o C (1)
45 Z = 3mm
900 RPM
It should be noted that Eq. (1) is valid only for the drilling
speed of 900 rpm and the applied force of 100 N. It can be
40
estimated from Eq. (1) that the bone temperature can reach
35 55 oC when the drill bit has an initial temperature of 60 oC
during drilling. Similar equations can also be established from
30
the proposed elastic-plastic dynamic finite element model for
0 2 4 6 8 10 other drilling speeds and applied forces.
Drill Time (s)
Figures 6(a) and (b) illustrate the contact von-Mises stress
Fig. 4. Variation in temperature with the drill time for various initial
temperatures of drill bit at depth z= 3mm
distribution in bone for the initial temperature of the drill bit
To = 30 and 67 oC , respectively. The drilling time shown in
63 Fig. 6 is 0.3 sec. The results show that the difference in von-
Mises stress distribution in bone during drilling is not obvious
58 for a drill bit with different initial temperatures. The drill bits
with three different rotating speeds, i.e. 600, 900 and 120 rpm,
53 are also explored. The applied force used in these cases is 100
N. Figure 7 shows the temperature distribution along the bone
48 depth for various rotating speeds of drill bit at depth z= 2mm.
The results indicate that a drill bit with a lower rotating speed
43 results in a higher temperature in the bone. Figures 8(a), (b)
and (c) show the contours of von-Mises stress distribution in
38 the bone during drilling for the rotating speed of 600, 900 and
1200 rpm, respectively. In this case, the initial temperature of
33 the drill bit is To = 67 oC and the drilling depth z is 1.2 mm. It
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Initial Temperature of Drill Bit (¢J)
can be seen that the maximum values of the von-Mises stress
obtained from the rotating speeds of 600, 900 and 1200 rpm are
89.9, 86.5 and 87.5 MPa, respectively. The rill bit with a lower
Fig. 5. Relationship between the maximum temperature in the bone and the rotating speed results in a higher von-Mises stress in the bone.
initial temperature of drill bit

1270
40.0 V. CONCLUSION
39.5 z=2mm 600 RPM In this study, a three-dimensional elastic-plastic dynamic
39.0 900 RPM temperature-displacement finite element model is proposed to
38.5 1200 RPM simulate the process of a drill bit drilling through a bone. This
study has performed numerical investigations into the
38.0
temperature rise and the contact stress distribution in bone
37.5 during drilling. The effect of the initial temperature of drill bit
37.0 on the temperature rise has been examined. Based upon the
36.5 numerical results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
36.0 1. The proposed dynamic elastic-plastic finite element model
35.5 can be used to simulate the temperature rise during a drill
35.0
bit drilling through the bone.
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2. A drill bit with a lower initial temperature can reduce the
Bone Depth Z (mm) temperature rise in bone during drilling.
Fig. 7. Variation in temperature vs. bone depth for various rotating speeds of
drill bit at depth z= 2mm 3. The temperature at the bone can reach 55 oC when the
drill bit has an initial temperature of 60 oC . This may
cause great damage to the bone.
4. A drill bit with a lower rotating speed results in a higher
temperature and von-Mises stress in the bone.
In future study, the mechanical properties of the bone and
the maximum temperature occurred in the bone during drilling
will be obtained from the experimental tests. The proposed
finite element model can thus be modified accordingly and will
be more accurate in temperature estimation.

REFERENCES
(a) 600 rpm
[1] M. T. Hillery, and I. Shuaib, “ Temperature effects in the drilling of
human and bovine bone, “ J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 92-93, pp.
302- 308, August 1999
[2] M. B. Abouzgia, and D. F. James, “Measurements of shaft speed while
drilling through bone,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 53, pp. 1308-1315,
1995.
[3] K. N. Bachus, M. T. Rondina, and D. T. Hutchinson, “ The effects of
drilling force on cortical temperatures and their duration: an in vitro
study,” Med. Eng. & Phys, vol. 22, pp. 685-691, 2000.
[4] W. Allan, E. D. Williams, and C. J. Kerawala, “Effects of repeated drill
use on temperature of bone during preparation for osteosynthesis self-
tapping screws,” Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 43, pp. 314-319,
2005.
(b) 900 rpm [5] Sean R. H. Davidson, and D. F. James, “Drilling in bone: modeling heat
generation and temperature distribution,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., vol.
125, pp. 305-314, June 2003.
[6] Y. B. Guo, and D. A. Dornfeld, “Finite element modeling of burr
formation process in drilling 304 stainless steel,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci.
Eng., vol. 122, pp. 612-619, November 2000.
[7] A. Borzacchiello, et al., “Comparison between the polymerization
behavior of a new bone cement and a commercial one: modeling and in
vitro analysis,” J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. in Medicine, vol. 9, pp. 835-838,
December 1998.
[8] http://www.matweb.com
[9] N. Colin, I. Paul, and D. John, “ Orthopaedic bone drills-can they be
improved ?,”J. Bone Joint Surg., vol. 78-B, pp. 357-362, 1996.
(c) 1200 rpm
Fig. 8. von-Mises stress distribution in bone during drilling for various rotating
speeds

1271

You might also like