Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By:
Jalal Poorolajal, MD, MPH, PhD
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 1
Proposal Components
Statement of Problem
Problem identification
Prioritizing problems
Analysis
Formulation and justification
Literature Review
Literature and other available information
References
Objectives
Methodology
Types of study
Variables
Sampling methods and sample size calculation
Data collection techniques and tools
Statistical methods of analysis
Ethical considerations
Pre-test and pilot study
Budget and work plan
Gant chart, materials, equipment, money
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 2
Classification of Epidemiologic Studies
Case report
Cross-sectional
Case base
Observational Ecological
Case-crossover
Case-control
Nested
Analytical
Case-cohort
Prospective
Community Trial Cohort
Retrospective
Study Filed Trial Parallel
Animal study
Narative
Review
Systematic Meta-analysis
Participants
Exposed Unexposed
Exposed Unexposed
without without
with disease with disease
disease disease
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 4
Cross-Sectional Study
The association between obesity and diabetes
Diabetics Non-diabetics Total
Obese 123 197 320
Non-obese 162 518 680
Total 285 715 1000
123 × 518
Odds Ratio = = 1.99
197 × 162
Interpretation
OR < 1.00: protective factor
OR = 1.00: ineffective
OR > 1.00: risk factor
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 5
Case-Control Study
Cases Controls
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 6
Case-Control Study
The association between smoking and gingivitis
Gingivitis Non-gingivitis
Smokers 92 42
Nonsmokers 58 108
Total 150 150
92 × 108
Odds Ratio = = 4.07
42 × 58
Interpretation
OR < 1.00: protective factor
OR = 1.00: ineffective
OR > 1.00: risk factor
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 7
Cohort Study
Exposed Unexposed
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 8
Cohort Study
The association between RA and dental caries
Dental caries No dental caries Total
With RA 42 58 100
Without RA 21 79 100
42 ÷ 100
Risk Ratio = = 2.00
21 ÷ 100
Interpretation
RR < 1.00: protective factor
RR = 1.00: ineffective
RR > 1.00: risk factor
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 9
Randomized Controlled Trials
Volunteers
Intervention Control
Not Not
Improved Improved
improved improved
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 10
Randomized Controlled Trials
The effect of mint extract on dysmenorrhea
Improved Not-improved Total
Mint extract 42 23 65
Placebo 18 47 65
42 ÷ 65
Risk Ratio = = 2.33
18 ÷ 65
Interpretation
RR < 1.00: intervention is worse than placebo
RR = 1.00: ineffective
RR > 1.00: intervention is better than placebo
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 11
Comparison of Epidemiological Studies
Feasibility and cost-saving
Strength of association
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 12
THANK YOU
25-Apr-21 poorolajal@umsha.ac.ir 13