You are on page 1of 11

| |

Received: 30 September 2018    Revised: 5 February 2019    Accepted: 1 March 2019

DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12700

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Genetic diversity, population structure and key phenotypic


traits driving variation within soyabean (Glycine max) collection
in Ghana

Nicholas Ninju Denwar1 | Frederick J. Awuku1  | Brian Diers2 |


Francisca Addae‐Frimpomaah1 | Godfree Chigeza3  | Richard Oteng‐Frimpong1  |
1 4
Doris K. Puozaa  | Michael T. Barnor

1
CSIR‐Savanna Agricultural Research
Institute, Tamale, Ghana Abstract
2
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] is an important oilseed crop worldwide and it has
Illinois, Urbana, Indiana
recently become the crop of interest in Ghana. In this study, 142 soybean accessions
3
International Institute of Tropical
Agriculture, Lusaka, Zambia
were genotyped with 34 SSR markers and concurrently evaluated for five quanti‐
4
West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement, tative and two qualitative phenotypic traits. Twenty‐nine of the SSR markers were
Accra, Ghana polymorphic with mean allele number of 5.3, polymorphic information content (PIC)
Correspondence of 0.51 and gene diversity of 0.55. Molecular analysis based on unweighted paired
Michael T. Barnor, West Africa Centre for group arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA)
Crop Improvement, Accra, Ghana.
Email: teye.barnor@gmail.com was similar in explaining the extent of diversity within the accessions. Structure
analysis placed most of the accessions into two subpopulations with 18 (12.7%) as
Funding information
USAID Soybean Innovation Lab admixtures. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on phenotypic traits revealed
two clusters. Both UPGMA clustering‐based SSR data and PCA from phenotypic data
*Communicated by: Bradley Morris
showed similar results. The assembled germplasm is genetically diverse with high
variation in flowering and maturity period, and key yield components which could
be exploited in developing superior varieties well adapted to Ghana and West Africa.

KEYWORDS
gene diversity, germplasm, maturity, population structure, soybean, traits

1 |  I NTRO D U C TI O N project funded by USAID’s Feed the Future Programme. Under this
project, the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research‐Savanna
Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) is one of the world's most import‐ Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) received soybean germplasm
ant legume crops due to its high seed oil and protein concentration as part of its collaboration with the US Department of Agriculture
(Satué‐Gracia, Heinonen, & Frankel, 1997; Van Ee, 2009). Although and the University of Illinois as part of an effort to genetically im‐
Ghana is not a major producer of soybean, it has seen a steady rise in prove the crop. SARI previously received limited amounts of germ‐
production, from 50,000 MT in 2005 to 142,000 MT in 2015 (MoFA, plasm from only the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
2016; MoFA‐SRID, 2007). However, the national average yield of (IITA), hence its gene pool was narrow with limited diversity. With this
1.65 t/ha (MoFA, 2016) is far lower than the average of 3.38 t/ha for new germplasm, it is important to study its genetic diversity and suit‐
Brazil (Statista, 2018) and the 3.34 t/ha obtained in the US (USDA‐ ability to the poor soils in major growing areas of the country (Buri,
NAS, 2018). The production and utilization of soybean in Ghana Iassaka, Fujii, & Wakatsuki, 2010; Goldsmith, 2017). Eujayl, Sorrells,
received a boost through the ongoing Soybean Innovation Lab Baum, Wolters, and Powell (2001) indicated that the evaluation of

Plant Breeding. 2019;00:1–11. © 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH |  1


wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pbr  
|
2       DENWAR et al.

variation with DNA markers helps ensure the effective use of ger‐ accessions were arranged in an alpha lattice design in three replicates
mplasm for crop productivity improvement/conservation. The use at SARI's experimental field, Akokeyiri in Nyankpala for the 2016
of new sources of genetic variation to develop improved varieties is cropping season (N09°24.388; W000°59.281) on the 27 June 2016
enhanced when the selection of parental genotypes is based on both and 2017 cropping season (N09°23.411; W001°00.234) on the 7 July
phenotypic and genetic dissimilarity (Bisen, Khare, Nair, & Tripathi, 2017. Each accession was planted in single row plot of 5 m long with a
2014). Hence, estimation of variation among soybean germplasm spacing of 50 cm between rows and 5 cm between plants within rows.
in Ghana is important to effectively select parental genotypes for Fifteen plants per plot were tagged for data collection. The accessions
hybridization and development of improved varieties. Dissimilarity were evaluated for flower colour, pubescence colour, days to 50%
among genotypes can be determined with morphological markers flowering (plants/plot), height at flowering, days to maturity (90% of
(Holbrook & Stalker, 2010); however, such markers are less effective pods turn brown), number of pods/plant, and 100 seed weight.
than DNA markers because they are limited in number and may be
subjective and influenced by the environment which could affect in‐
2.3 | DNA extraction and SSR genotyping
ferences from such experiments (Holbrook & Stalker, 2010).
The advent of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Mullis & Fresh leaves were harvested from the first trifoliate of ten 3‐
Faloona, 1987) has led to the development and utilization of PCR‐ week‐old plants for each genotype and bulked into Ziploc bags
based markers such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs), single nu‐ and transported to the laboratory on ice. The leaf samples were
cleotide polymorphism (SNP), random amplified polymorphic DNA then dried for 3 days using silica gel and ground using bead
(RAPDs) and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs). beaters. About 0.02 g of ground tissue was transferred into 2‐ml
In particular, SSR markers have been widely used for genotyp‐ Eppendorf tubes and genomic DNA extraction was carried out
ing and characterizing soybean (Bisen et al., 2014; Guan et al., using the CTAB method (Tiwari, Jadhav, & Gupta, 2012). The
2010; Kuroda, Kaga, Tomooka, & Vaughan, 2006; Li et al., 2010; quantity and quality of extracted DNA were checked on a 2%
Wang, Run‐zhi, Wan‐ming, & Wei‐jun, 2010). More recently, the agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The DNA samples
soySNP50K iSelect BeadChip has been developed for the char‐ were then diluted to 50 ng/μl prior to PCR amplification. A set
acterization of soybean genotypes, and quantitative mapping of of 34 SSR markers, distributed on 16 of the 20 soybean chro‐
desired loci (Song et al., 2013). Genotyping service providers are mosomes (Cregan et al., 1999) (Table S1) were used to geno‐
moving towards the use of SNP markers but SSR markers con‐ type the accessions. Amplification of DNA was carried out in
tinue to be used because of their abundance in the plant genome, a 10‐µl PCR reaction volume (5 µl of x2 VWR Red Taq DNA
simple equipment required, codominant nature and high level of Polymerase master mix, 3 µl nuclease‐free water, 1 µl of 10 mM
allelic variation (Bisen et al., 2014; Kuroda et al., 2006; Rakoczy‐ primer [0.5 µl each of forward and reverse], 1 µl of genomic
trojanowska & Bolibok, 2004). These traits make SSR markers more DNA). The reaction was amplified in an ABI thermal cycler with
efficient for estimation of dissimilarity and evaluation of genetic the conditions of denaturation (94°C /30 s), annealing X°C [de‐
distance. In this study, 142 soybean genotypes comprising released pending on primer (Table S1)]/30 s, and extension 72°C/30 s for
varieties, advanced breeding lines and plant introductions showing a cycle length of 35. PCR products were resolved on a horizon‐
wide variations for maturity period and seed size were assessed for tal 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis system at 120V for
their genetic diversity and population structure using SSR markers 3 hr. Ethidium bromide staining was employed and the image
and to identify major phenotypic traits contributing to variations captured for analysis.
among the accessions.

3 | DATA A N A LYS I S
2 |  M ATE R I A L S A N D M E TH O DS
3.1 | Gene diversity
2.1 | Plant materials
Two methods of scoring bands were employed. The presence and
In this study, 142 soybean genotypes (Table S1) comprising 5 re‐ absence method of band scoring where the presence of bands for
leased varieties, 11 plant introductions and 126 advanced breed‐ each locus was scored as ‘1’ and the absence as ‘0’. In the second
ing lines were evaluated on the field for 2 years. These genotypes approach, bands were scored by size, where two clearest bands for
were assembled from SARI, Ghana; USA; IITA, Nigeria; Brazil; and each marker/sample is scored as a/b. Cluster analysis was carried out
SEEDCO, Zimbabwe. using the Jaccard similarity test and unweighted pair group method
with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering method (Durvasula &
Rao, 2018) in DARwin (Perrier & Jacquemoud, 2009). Genetic dif‐
2.2 | Field evaluation
ferentiation parameters including polymorphic information content
The accessions were field evaluated for two seasons to assess their di‐ (PIC), major allele frequency, heterozygosity and number of alleles
versity in relation to qualitative and quantitative traits of importance per markers were generated with the aid of PowerMarker V3.2.5
for crop improvement and adaptation to the local environment. The (Liu & Muse, 2005).
DENWAR et al. |
      3

membership probability ≥ 0.6 were put into the same subpopu‐


3.2 | Population structure
lation while genotypes with membership probability less than
Simple sequence repeat marker data were subjected to structural 0.6 were put into mixed groups. The fixation index (Fst) for each
analysis using data from 29 polymorphic markers. The geno‐ subpopulation by the best ‘K’ was estimated by the STRUCTURE
types were assigned population IDs (1–6) based on their origin software.
(Table S3). Bayesian clustering analysis was carried out in the
STRUCTURE programme (Pritchard, Stephens, & Donnelly, 2000)
3.3 | Principal coordinate analysis
to evaluate the population structure. Three independent runs
were performed for each number of assumed subpopulations (K) The general diversity of the soybean accessions was visualized in
ranging from 1 to 12, using the admixture model correlated for the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using the Jaccard dissimilar‐
all frequencies. A burn‐in period of 50,000 and an MCMC run ity matrix generated in Darwin V6 (Perrier and Jacquemoud‐Collet,
length of 100,000 for each run for all ranges of Evanno's method 2006) based on molecular data. The two flower colour types, pur‐
(Earl & vonHoldt, 2012; Evanno, Regnaut, & Goudet, 2005) was ple and white, were scored for each genotype, and given numeri‐
used to estimate the best number of subpopulations (ΔK) that cal identification where purple was represented by 1 and white as
explains the structure of the genotypes. The run with the maxi‐ 0. Similarly, pod pubescence colour, grey, brown and white, were
mum log likelihood was used to assign genotypes into subpopu‐ also scored as 0, 1 and 2 for grey, brown and white respectively.
lations based on their membership probability. Genotypes with These were combined with the five quantitative traits and subjected

TA B L E 1   Genetic differentiation
Major allele
parameters on 142 soybean varieties as
Marker frequency Allele number Allele diversity Heterozygosity PIC
revealed by 29 polymorphic SSR markers
sat_280 0.88 6 0.22 0.08 0.21
satt612 0.38 8 0.71 0.73 0.66
GMES4591 0.50 3 0.59 1.00 0.51
GMES2891 0.34 9 0.80 0.54 0.77
Satt244 0.26 11 0.81 0.77 0.79
Satt545 0.32 7 0.79 0.99 0.76
GMES6224 0.50 4 0.62 0.99 0.55
GMES3177 0.94 3 0.11 0.00 0.10
GMES3757 0.89 2 0.20 0.00 0.18
GMES6842 0.68 2 0.43 0.00 0.34
GMES0676 0.96 4 0.07 0.01 0.07
CSSR18 0.40 11 0.71 0.97 0.65
CSSR438 0.50 4 0.55 0.99 0.45
GMES0707 0.73 3 0.41 0.08 0.35
GMES2038 0.50 3 0.53 1.00 0.42
GMES2036 0.99 2 0.03 0.00 0.03
GMES6270 0.43 5 0.62 0.91 0.55
GMES3941 0.82 3 0.30 0.00 0.26
Sat_210 0.36 8 0.72 0.83 0.68
AW781285 0.51 4 0.60 0.07 0.52
Sat_142 0.35 4 0.73 0.46 0.68
Sat_038 0.40 5 0.66 0.82 0.60
AW310961 0.32 5 0.75 0.38 0.70
Sat_305 0.89 2 0.19 0.00 0.17
Sat_205 0.23 9 0.83 0.70 0.80
Sat_254 0.57 5 0.59 0.11 0.54
Sat_105 0.30 7 0.78 0.80 0.75
Sat_125 0.18 9 0.86 0.54 0.84
Sat_171 0.26 5 0.79 0.85 0.75
Mean 0.53 5.3 0.55 0.50 0.51
|
4       DENWAR et al.

to principal component analysis (PCA) in the software, XLSTAT measure of allelic diversity, ranged from 0.03 for marker GMES2036
(XLSTAT, 2015). to 0.84 for marker Sat_125 with a mean of 0.51. Eighteen SSR mark‐
ers representing 62.1% of the markers used were observed to have
PIC value of greater than 0.5. These markers were the most in‐
4 |   R E S U LT S
formative for discerning differences among the soybean accessions.
Heterogeneity ranged from 0.0 to 1 with an average of 0.50.
4.1 | Gene diversity
Of the 34 SSR markers, 29 (85.3%) successfully amplified polymor‐
4.2 | Population structure
phic loci in all 142 soybean genotypes evaluated (Table 1). Allele
frequencies recorded ranged from 2 to 11 with an average of 5.3 The Evanno method estimated the best ‘K’ to be 2 (Figure 1a),
alleles per marker and amplified a total of 153 alleles (Table 1). Of thereby clustering the genotypes into two subpopulations/Clusters
the 29 polymorphic markers, 4 (13.8%) were biallelic (2 alleles/locus) (Table S3; Figure 1c). The proportion of each of the 6 groupings/
while the remaining 25 were multiallelic (>2 alleles/locus). The mean population of genotypes in each cluster is shown in Figure 1b.
allele frequency of 5.3 alleles per locus is relatively high. Major allele Most of the accessions (87.3%) were assigned to a cluster with
frequency for the markers used ranged from 0.18 for Sat_125 to 0.99 the remaining 12.7% classified as mixed. An allele frequency diver‐
for GMES2036 with an average of 0.53. Of the 29 SSR markers, 15 gence of 0.108 was estimated between the two subpopulations.
used recorded major allele frequency of 0.5 and above. The marker Expected heterozygosity in subpopulation 2 was 0.1942 while
Sat_125 had the highest allele diversity (0.86), whereas the lowest subpopulation 1 recorded expected heterozygosity of 0.310.
of 0.03 was recorded for marker GMES2036 (Table 1) with a mean The lines from IITA (TGX genotypes) showed great diversity from
gene diversity of 0.55. Polymorphic information content (PIC), a structure analysis with the majority belonging to subpopulations

F I G U R E 1   Population structure of 142 soybean accessions. a, Delta K for varying number of sub populations (K) from 1 to 12. b,
Distribution of genotypes among the two clusters revealed by structure analysis. Blue colour represents proportion of genotypes in cluster
1, brown colour represents proportion of genotypes in cluster 2 and ash colour represents the total number of genotype in each grouping.
c, Estimated population structure of the soybean genotypes as revealed by 29 simple sequence markers for (K = 2), red indicates cluster 1,
green indicates cluster 2. 1–6 represents the source/origin of the genotypes as IITA, USA, SEEDCO, SARI, BRAZIL and MIXED respectively
DENWAR et al. |
      5

1. Genotypes from the USA were less diverse with most occurring also matched with those in cluster I of the UPGMA clustering. In
in subpopulation 2 (S3). 'Jenguma', the most cultivated soybean all, the grouping due to PCoA showed concordance with that of the
variety in Ghana was classified as mixed. Fixation index (FST ), a UPGMA. All accessions from the US grouped together (mostly in
measure of genetic differentiation was higher in subpopulation 1 II) with a few occurring within other groups just as accessions from
(0.256) which mainly contains the TGX accessions from IITA, than IITA grouped together in group I, similar to cluster II in the UPGMA
that of subpopulation 2 (0.0058), which is composed of a mixture clustering (Figure 2). The locally released varieties; 'Jenguma',
of US and IITA accessions. 'Salintuya1', 'Quarshie' and 'Songdaa' occurred in group I, similar to
subcluster IIE (Figure 2).

4.3 | Cluster analysis
4.5 | Principal component analysis
The UPGMA clustering grouped the genotypes into two clusters
(Figure 2). Cluster I is made up of 23 accessions most of which The phenotypic data revealed high diversity among the genotypes.
were from IITA. There is no clear‐cut demarcation for their group‐ Days to 50% flowering ranged from 28 to 63 days averaging 45 days.
ing as members of cluster I show wide variations for phenotypic The genotypes recorded a height at flowering of 0.12 m for the
and agronomic traits evaluated in this study (Table S1). One geno‐ shortest and 0.72 m for the tallest with a mean height of  0.31 m. The
type (TGX2011‐6F) was found to be an outlier within this cluster; number of pods per plant recorded a range of 16 pods to 116 pods
this genotype is a TGX line of medium maturity (115 days) with 100 per plant. Days to maturity also recorded a range of 83–175 days
seed weight of 11 g (S2). Although its agronomic and phenotypic and averaging 102 days to maturity. 100 seed weight recorded as
traits are not distinct from all the lines in this collection, it was low as 7.6 g and a maximum of 20.9 g with a mean value of 13.11 g.
genetically placed as an outlier (Figure 2). The remaining 119 ac‐ Flower colour recorded two categories among the genotypes: white
cession grouped into cluster II, which subdivided into several sub‐ flower type (16.2%) and purple flower type (83.8%); these were
clusters. The most distinct subcluster of cluster II was IID which corded as ‘1’ and ‘0’ respectively. Pod pubescence colour exhibited
was genotypes from the USA. These genotypes were photoperiod three categories: grey (21.8%), brown (64.1%) and white (14.1%) and
sensitive which resulted in their early flowering, early maturing and were corded as ‘0’, ‘1’ and ‘2’ respectively. All seven phenotypic data
shorter plant height at flowering (S1). However, these genotypes were used for the PCA which saw the first principal component, PC1
recorded higher seed weight than most of the TGX genotypes. The accounting for 41.39% of the total variation among the genotypes
most similar genotypes among this group were LD11‐2,170 and (Table 2), with positive associations with some key traits (Table 3).
LG15‐2049, with a similarity coefficient of 0.97 and the most simi‐ PC2 accounted for 13.45% of the total variation and associated pos‐
lar among all the genotypes. itively with 100 seed weight, number of pods per plant, height at
Four locally released varieties ('Quarshie', 'Songda', 'Jenguma' flowering and pubescence colour (Figure 4).
and 'Salintuya1') and TGX1844‐22E, an advanced breeding line, Principal component analysis placed the 142 soybean genotypes
were all grouped in subcluster IIF. 'Jenguma', the most cultivated into two groups (Figure 4). Summary of the characteristics of the
soybean variety in Ghana was 76% similar to TGX1844‐22E which two groups as revealed by the five quantitative traits is shown in
has been earmarked for release. 'SoungPungun', another released Table 4. Group I comprised mainly of genotypes obtained from the
variety in Ghana which occurred in cluster I, was the most distant USA. However, four tropical glycine genotypes, TGX1990‐40F, TGX
among the locally released varieties. Subcluster IID is 53% similar to 1,448‐2E, TGX 1993‐4FN and TGX 2025‐13E were grouped with the
subcluster IIE, and shared 51% similarity with subcluster IIIF which US lines. Genotypes in group I strongly associated with 100 seed
harbours most of the locally released varieties. Subcluster IIIA, had weight, which gave the second highest contribution (18.909) to the
only two genotypes, TGX2004‐10F and TGX2025‐8E, and are con‐ observed variation in PC1 (Table 3). 100 seed weight of the lines
sidered outliers as the line, TGX2011‐6F, in cluster I. Though both in Group I ranged from 12 to 23 g (Table S1). Group II contained all
genotypes were similar in days to 50% flowering and plant height at the TGX genotypes obtained from IITA and five released varieties
flowering, they differed markedly in 100 seed weight and number of in Ghana, including 'Jenguma', 'Quarshie', 'Songdaa', 'SoungPungun'
days to maturity (S1). With the exception of subcluster IID in which and 'Salintuyo1' (Figure 4).
the genotypes were similar in 100 seed weight, days to 50% flower‐
ing, height at flowering and days to maturity (S1), clustering of other
genotypes based on markers did not show a clear relationship with 5 | D I S CU S S I O N
the phenotypic traits evaluated in this study.
Many reports showed that SSR markers were effective for gene di‐
versity studies as a result of the multiallelic and co‐dominant nature
4.4 | Principal coordinate analysis
of these markers (Khanh, Anh, Buu, & Xuan, 2013; Priolli, Mendes‐
Three groupings (I, II and III) can be seen from the PCoA (Figure 3). Junior, Arantes, & Contel, 2002). Inghelandt, Melchinger, Lebreton,
Group II could be seen as a subset of group I, similar to subcluster and Stich (2010) and Yu et al. (2011) also noted that many SNPs
IID of the UPGMA clustering (Figure 2) and genotypes in group III markers were required to obtain the same information as a few SSR
|
6       DENWAR et al.

LD14-3698
TGX2008-4F
LD14-3702
TGX1990-57F
TGX1990-21F
LD14-6796
TGX1485-1D
SoungPungun
TGX2004-3F
TGX2011-7F
I TGX2006-3F
TGX1989-19F
BRSGO8660
TGX2007-11F
BRSGO8360
TGX1844-19F
SEEDCO23
SEEDCO6
LG14-7959
FTCristaline
NE3400
Ozark
TGX2011-6F
TGX1805-8F
TGX1989-20F
IIH TGX1988-3F
TGX1799-8F
LD00-3309
SEEDCO25
Croton
IIG Liuyuemang
11S-8205
SEEDCO4
TGX1989-11F
TGX1835-10E
Quarshie
TGX1448-2E
TGX1993-4FN
Songda
SEEDCO3
TGX1448-2E
TGX1990-57F
TGX1990-55F
TGX1990-93F
IIF TGX1844-22E
Jenguma
SEEDCO27
TGX1990-114FN
Salintuya1
TGX1448-2E
SEEDCO26
TGX1993-4FN
TGX1845-10E
TGX1903-7F
TGX1989-68FN
TGX1740-2F
TGX2010-15F
TGX1987-14F
TGX2027-1E
TGX2022-4E
TGX2025-9E
TGX2004-13F
Wamini
LD14-3090
TGX1990-46F
TGX1990-95F
TGX2009-12F
TGX1990-40F
TGX1990-52F
TGX1990-80F
TGX1834-5E
TGX1989-41F
TGX1987-62F
IIE TGX1988-5E
TGX2023-3E
TGX2016-3E
TGX1910-6E
TGX1993-4FN
TGX1989-45F
TGX1989-19F
TGX1989-53FN
TGX1989-42F
TGX1989-48FN
TGX1987-10F
TGX1485-1D-C
TGX1989-48FN
TGX1989-49FN
SEEDCO28
TGX2008-4F
TGX1989-45F
TGX1990-78F
TGX1989-40F
TGX2009-16F
TGX1990-40F
LG14-8024
LG15-2243
LG15-4486
LG14-6165
LG15-2775
LD14-1429
LD14-3340
LD14-6766
LD14-1167
LG14-6201
LD11-2170
IID
LG15-2049
LG15-4695
LD14-6444
LD13-8769
LD13-3483
LD14-3218
LD14-6190
LG15-2224
LG15-2214
LG13-3993
LG13-1257
LG15-4418
LG15-2136
TGX2010-3F
TGX2007-8F
TGX2010-12F
TGX1987-62F
TGX2025-19E
TGX2025-13E
TGX2025-6E
TGX1990-110FN
IIC BRS313
TGX2010-11F
TGX2010-4E
TGX1989-68FN
TGX2011-3F
TGX2019-1C
TGX2017-5E
TGX2017-6E
TGX2008-2F
TGX2020-1E
TGX1445-3E
IIB QinghuangzadouNo.7
BRS326
TGX2026-2E
IIA TGX2004-10F
TGX2025-8E

0.93 0.83 0.73 0.63 0.53 0.43 0.33


Similarity

F I G U R E 2   An UPGMA clustering of soybean accessions based on 29 polymorphic simple sequence repeat markers
DENWAR et al. |
      7

F I G U R E 3   Principal coordinate analysis displays of 142 soybean accessions. Green coloured lines indicate lines from the US, red coloured
lines indicate lines from IITA, blue coloured lines indicate local Ghanaian lines and black coloured lines indicated mixed accessions. The circle
is to explain the groupings as observed

markers. Consequently, genetic studies that use SSR markers tend landraces. The 142 accessions used in this study were largely com‐
to record higher allelic diversity parameters than studies that use posed of advanced breeding lines and a few released varieties which
SNP markers. The mean gene diversity of 0.55 recorded in this study might explain the lower gene diversity as compared to other studies
is similar to that of Huang et al. (2016) who reported a mean gene (Diwan & Cregan, 1997; Li et al., 2010; Xu, Li, Yang, & Xu, 2017) that
diversity of 0.59 using 24 SSR markers to screen 150 soybean acces‐ used landraces. Gene diversity of 0.55 obtained in this study implies
sions. Similarly, the PIC of 0.51 observed in this study is similar to that the SSR markers used were highly polymorphic and could be
the mean PIC of 0.49 obtained by Torres et al. (2015) in a study that used in soybean breeding programmes.
involves genotyping 191 soybean accessions with 22 SSR markers. Structure analysis revealed two subpopulations for the 142 ac‐
Bisen et al., (2014) recorded lower diversity parameters on soybean cessions, except for 18 accession admixtures. The mean fixation
including mean gene diversity of 0.2339, heterozygosity of 0.0469 index (Fst) of 0.256 within subpopulation 1 indicates a higher ge‐
and polymorphic information content of 0.1998 as compared to this netic diversity within this subpopulation from which parental stocks
study. With exception of the results reported by Bisen et al., (2014), could selected to produce variable populations for selection. Very
genotyping soybean with SSR markers generally give high values of low mean Fst value (0.0056) was recorded among genotypes in sub‐
diversity parameters. population 2 which was dominated by the advanced breeding lines
On the other hand, Zhangxiong et al., (2017) obtained gene di‐ from the US. The grouping of some IITA lines with the bulk of US
versity of 0.34 despite using 5,195 SNP markers to genotype 577 genotypes indicated their close relatedness through common an‐
accessions of soybean. Despite a large number of markers and acces‐ cestry. Crosses between individuals in subpopulations 1 and 2 could
sions used in this study, diversity parameters reported were lower also adduce the needed variation to enhance genetic gain through
than what has been reported by most SSR marker‐based studies in‐ active selection.
cluding the present study. Generally, diversity within a collection of Cluster analysis discerned all the accessions as distinct indi‐
advanced breeding lines and released varieties are lower than among viduals thus, agreeing with the suggestion that SSR markers are
|
8       DENWAR et al.

TA B L E 2   The contribution of traits to


  PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7
the observed variation in each principal
Flower 7.968 33.457 40.219 1.321 0.941 16.074 0.02 component
colour
Pubescence 11.355 20.304 0.332 60.108 2.726 0.451 4.724
colour
Days to 50% 21.191 0.454 0.006 2.14 18.445 15.555 42.209
flowering
Height at 17.268 0.026 2.345 10.659 35.998 31.056 2.648
flowering
No. of pod/ 9.665 37.873 9.157 24.154 4.468 14.505 0.178
plant
Days to 13.645 1.573 39.244 0.672 14.354 22.235 8.278
maturity
100 seed 18.909 6.314 8.697 0.946 23.069 0.123 41.943
weight
Eigenvalue 2.897 0.942 0.874 0.73 0.617 0.543 0.398
Variability 41.39 13.452 12.48 10.43 8.814 7.751 5.682
(%)
Cumulative 41.39 54.843 67.322 77.753 86.567 94.318 100
%

most suitable at clustering germplasm into populations (Hamblin, response were grouped together by SSR marker‐based cluster
Warburton, & Buckler, 2007; Rosenberg, Li, Ward, & Pritchard, analysis gives some credence to the suggestion that the origin of
2003). The three major clusters were formed at a similarity coeffi‐ genotypes is the principal factor driving differentiation in culti‐
cient of 35%, an indication of the high diversity between and among vated soybean (Liu et al., 2017; Roberts et al., 1996). High vari‐
accessions evaluated in this study. Largely, the placement of acces‐ ation in days to flowering among the accessions studied can be
sions into major clusters did not reveal a clear relationship with phe‐ exploited to develop varieties for the different agroecologies in
notypic traits considered in this study as genotypes with clusters Ghana, especially, the Guinea and Sudan savannah ecologies with
showed contrasting phenotypic traits. However, placement of ac‐ monomodal rainfall pattern.
cessions in subcluster IIID corresponded strongly with phenotypic Number of pods per plant and 100 seed weight are principal
data including days to 50% flowering, 100 seed weight and days to yield components and key yield determinants of soybean. Zhang,
maturity (Table S1). Xu, Mao, Hu, and Gong (2013) noted that soybean seed weight
Similar genotypes were grouped in subcluster IID (Figure 2), was stable across environments, and concluded that most of the
group II of PCoA (Figure 3) and the group I of PCA (Figure 4). observed phenotypic variation was mainly due to genetic effect.
These genotypes were similar in days to 50% flowering and 100 100 seed weight of released varieties in Ghana ranges from 10 to
seed weight (S2). The fact that genotypes with similar flowering 13 g while that of the accessions used in this study ranges from 8

TA B L E 3   Principal components for 142


  PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7
soybean accessions based on seven traits
Flower 0.48 −0.561 −0.593 0.098 0.076 −0.295 0.009 showing the loading values
colour
Pubescence 0.574 0.437 −0.054 0.662 0.13 −0.049 −0.137
colour
Days to 50% 0.784 −0.065 −0.007 0.125 −0.337 0.291 0.41
flowering
Height at 0.707 0.016 −0.143 −0.279 0.471 0.41 −0.103
flowering
No. of pod/ 0.529 0.597 −0.283 −0.42 −0.166 −0.281 0.027
plant
Days to 0.629 −0.122 0.586 −0.07 0.298 −0.347 0.181
maturity
100 seed −0.74 0.244 −0.276 0.083 0.377 −0.026 0.408
weight
DENWAR et al. |
      9

4
SEEDCO 6

Qing huangzadou No.7

FT Cristaline
TGX 2007-8F
TGX 2020-1E
TGX 1448-2E
TGX 2009-12F
2 TGX 2025-19E
SEEDCO 23 BRSGO 8660
Quarshie No. of pod/plant
Liu yuemang
LG 15-2136 SEEDCO 27 TGX 2010-3F TGX 2011-3F
TGX 2008-4F TGX 1989-42F
Pod hair colour
LD 14-1167 LG 15-2243 TGX 1835-10E
TGX 2011-7F
LG 14-8024 Croton TGX 1910-6E TGX 1990-57F
Ozark TGX 2010-12F
TGX
SEEDCO 3 2004-10F
1 Wamini TGX 2017-5ETGX 1799-8F
TGX 1485-1D TGX 1448-2E
PC2(13.45 %)

100 seed wtLG 15-2224 TGX 2025-6E


LD 11-2170 TGX 2025-13E TGX 2017-6E TGX 1903-7F
LG 14-6201 NE 3400 TGX 1993-4FN TGX 2022-4E
TGX 1485-1D-C Salintuya 1
TGX 2008-4F
LG 15-2049 LD 14-3218 11S-8205 TGX 2010-4E
TGX1990-40F TGX 2004-3F
LG 14-6165 TGX 2008-2F
BRS 313 TGX 1990-80F TGX 1990-55F
LD 14-3090
Songda TGX 1834-5ETGX 1989-68FNSEEDCO 26 Height at flowering

0
LD 14-6190 BRSGOTGX8360
2010-15F Jenguma
LG 15-2214 LD 13-3483 LD 14-6444
LD… LD 00-3309 TGX TGX 1989-45F
2026-2E TGX 1805-8F Days to 50% flowering
SEEDCO 25 TGX 1988-5E TGX 1990-93F
LG 13-3993 TGX 1990-52F SEEDCO Days to maturity
4 1844-22E
TGX 1989-41F TGX
LD 14-3702 TGX 2025-8E TGX 1990-78F SEEDCO 28
TGX 1990-40F TGX 2004-13F
LD 14-3340 TGX 1448-2E TGX 1990-46F TGX 1989-20F
TGX 1990-95F TGX 1989-19F
LD 14-6766 TGX 1989-53FN
–1 BRS 326
TGX 1989-11F TGX 1990-114FN TGX 1993-4FN
TGX 1845-10E
LG 13-1257 LG 14-7959
LG 15-4695 TGX 2016-3E
TGX TGX
2023-3E
2007-11F TGX…
LG
LD 13-8769 15-4418
LG 15-4486 TGX 1993-4FN TGX 1987-62F
TGX 2027-1E
LD 14-6796 TGX 2025-9E TGX 1989-49FNTGX 1989-68FN
TGX 1988-3F
LG 15-2775 TGX 1989-48FN TGX 1989-45F
TGX 2019-1C Flower colour
TGX 2011-6F TGX 1987-62F
LD 14-1429 TGX 1990-110FN TGX 1740-2F
–2 TGXTGXTGX 1990-57F
… 2006-3F
SoungTGX TGX
Pungun 1987-14F
2010-11F
TGX 1987-10F
TGX 1990-21F

TGX 1989-48FN
–3
–3 –2.5 –2 –1.5 –1 –0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
PC1 (41.39 %)

F I G U R E 4   Biplot of the first two principal components showing 142 accessions and their associations with phenotypic traits

TA B L E 4   Summary statistics for two


Minimum Maximum Mean
groups revealed by principal component
Traits GRP1 GRP 2 GRP1 GRP 2 GRP1 GRP 2 analysis

Days to 50% flower‐ 28 40 50 63 35 51


ing (days)
Height at flowering 12.00 18.55 38.75 72.80 21.86 35.67
(cm)
No. of pods per plant 16.00 18.00 103.30 116.00 36.43 56.38
Days to maturity 85.00 83.00 129.00 175.00 92.64 105.99
100 seed weight (g) 10.00 7.60 20.90 19.40 15.90 11.82

to 23 g (Table S1). The wide variation in 100 seed weight among phenotypic traits driving variation in the assembled germplasm.
the current collection could be used to improve existing varieties Combining molecular characterization with phenotypic charac‐
for yield and other yield components (Han et al., 2012; Hao et al., terization is more informative than either of the two alone, espe‐
2012; Zhou et al., 2015). cially, for breeders who do not only need knowledge of population
structure and relatedness among genotypes but also need to iden‐
tify useful phenotypic traits to drive hybridization and selection.
6 | CO N C LU S I O N More sources of germplasm must be targeted to increase diversity
beyond the two main groups identified in the study to improve
The SSR markers used in this study were very informative and cultivar development at CSIR‐SARI.
could be useful in future studies including Quantitative trait loci
(QTL) mapping of desired traits. Structure, cluster and PCoAs gave
AC K N OW L E D G E M E N T
similar patterns of grouping indicating that the assembled germ‐
plasm largely belonged to two subpopulations. Structure analysis The funding for this work was provided by USAID Soybean
also showed that a significant proportion of the observed genetic Innovation Lab. We are grateful to Ofosu Asante Aning, Mwintuana
variation among 142 genotypes was due to population struc‐ Yelkuro Masuum and Emmanuella Adams of CSIR‐SARI for their as‐
ture. PCA of phenotypic traits was useful in elucidating the vital sistance with the laboratory analysis.
|
10       DENWAR et al.

C O N FL I C T O F I N T E R E S T Euphytica (Vol. 119 (pp. 39–43). Dordrecht: Springer. https​ ://doi.


org/10.1007/978-94-017-3674-9_80
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Evanno, G., Regnaut, S., & Goudet, J. (2005). Detecting the number
of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A sim‐
ulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14(8), 2611–2620. https​ ://doi.
AU T H O R C O N T R I B U T I O N S org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
Goldsmith, P. (2017). The Faustian Bargain of tropical soybean produc‐
The funding for the work was received through Nicholas Ninju tion. Tropical Conservation Science, 10, 194008291772389. https​://
Denwar. Nicholas Ninju Denwar, Frederick Justice Awuku and doi.org/10.1177/19400​82917​723892
Michael Teye Barnor conceptualized the initial work and the planned Guan, R., Chang, R., Li, Y., Wang, L., Liu, Z., & Qiu, L. (2010). Genetic
diversity comparison between Chinese and Japanese soybeans
activities of this work. Francisca Addae‐Frimpomaah, Richard Oteng‐
(Glycine max (L.) Merr.) revealed by nuclear SSRs. Genetic Resources
Frimpong and Michael Teye Barnor carried out the field experiment and Crop Evolution, 57(2), 229–242. https​ ://doi.org/10.1007/
and collection of the data. Frederick Justice Awuku and Doris K. s10722-009-9465-8
Puoza performed the laboratory experiments and organized the Hamblin, M. T., Warburton, M. L., & Buckler, E. S. (2007). Empirical com‐
parison of simple sequence repeats and single nucleotide polymor‐
data. Frederick Justice Awuku and Michael Teye Barnor analysis and
phisms in assesment of maize diversity and relatedness. PLoS ONE,
interpreted the data generated for both field and laboratory work. 2(12), 1–9. https​://doi.org/10.1371/journ​al.pone.0001367
Frederick Justice Awuku and Michael Teye Barnor drafted the initial Han, Y., Li, D., Zhu, D., Li, H., Li, X., Teng, W., & Li, W. (2012). QTL analysis
manuscript. Nicholas Ninju Denwar and Godfree Chigeza carried out of soybean seed weight across multi‐genetic backgrounds and envi‐
ronments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 125(4), 671–683. https​://
the initial review of the manuscript. Brian Diers finally reviewed and
doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1859-x
shaped the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final Hao, D., Cheng, H., Yin, Z., Cui, S., Zhang, D., Wang, H., & Yu, D.
draft of the manuscript. (2012). Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms and hap‐
lotypes associated with yield and yield components in soybean
(Glycine max) landraces across multiple environments. Theoretical
ORCID and Applied Genetics, 124(3), 447–458. https​ ://doi.org/10.1007/
s00122-011-1719-0
Frederick J. Awuku  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2567-5699 Holbrook, C. C., & Stalker, H. T. (2010). Peanut breeding and genetic re‐
sources. In J. Janick (Ed.), Plant breeding reviews (Vol. 22). Hoboken,
Godfree Chigeza  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9235-0694
NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https​://doi.org/10.1002/97804​70650​
Richard Oteng‐Frimpong  https://orcid. 202.ch6.
org/0000-0001-6083-1461 Huang, L. I., Ren, X., Wu, B., Li, X., Chen, W., Zhou, X., … Jiang, H. (2016).
Development and deployment of a high‐density linkage map identi‐
fied quantitative trait loci for plant height in peanut (Arachis hypo‐
gaea L.). Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–10. https​://doi.org/10.1038/srep3​
REFERENCES
9478
Khanh, T. D., Anh, T. Q., Buu, B. C., & Xuan, T. D. (2013). Applying mo‐
Bisen, A., Khare, D., Nair, P., & Tripathi, N. (2014). SSR analysis of 38 gen‐
lecular breeding to improve soybean rust resistance in Vietnamese
otypes of soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merr.) genetic diversity in India.
Elite Soybean. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4(1), 1–6. https​://
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 21(1), 109–115. https​://doi.
doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.41001​
org/10.1007/s12298-014-0269-8
Kuroda, Y., Kaga, A., Tomooka, N., & Vaughan, D. A. (2006). Population
Buri, M. M., Iassaka, R. N., Fujii, H., & Wakatsuki, T. (2010). Comparison
genetic structure of Japanese wild soybean (Glycine soja) based on
of soil nutrient status of some rice growing environments in the
microsatellite variation. Molecular Ecology, 15(4), 959–974. https​://
major agro‐ecological zones of Ghana. Journal of Food, Agriculture and
doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02854.x
Environment, 8(1), 384–388.
Li, Y. H., Li, W., Zhang, C., Yang, L., Chang, R. Z., Gaut, B. S., & Qiu, L. J.
Cregan, P. B., Jarvik, T., Bush, A. l., Shoemaker, R. C., Lark, K. G., Kahler,
(2010). Genetic diversity in domesticated soybean (Glycine max) and
A. l., … Specht, J. E. (1999). An integrated genetic linkage map of
its wild progenitor (Glycine soja) for simple sequence repeat and sin‐
the soybean genome. Crop Science, 39(5), 1464–1490. https​://doi.
gle‐nucleotide polymorphism loci. New Phytologist, 188(1), 242–253.
org/10.2135/crops​ci1999.3951464x
https​://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03344.x
Diwan, N., & Cregan, P. B. (1997). Automated sizing of fluorescent‐la‐
Liu, K., & Muse, S. V. (2005). PowerMaker: An integrated analysis envi‐
beled simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to assay genetic varia‐
ronment for genetic maker analysis. Bioinformatics, 21(9), 2128–2129.
tion in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 95(5‐6), 723–733.
https​://doi.org/10.1093/bioin​forma​tics/bti282
https​://doi.org/10.1007/s0012​20050618.
Liu, Z., Li, H., Wen, Z., Fan, X., Li, Y., Guan, R., … Qiu, L. (2017). Comparison
Durvasula, R., & Rao, D. V. S. (2018). Extremophiles: Nature’s Amazing
of genetic diversity between Chinese and American Soybean (Glycine
Adapters. In P. Hamon, M. Seguin, X. Perrier, & J. C. Glaszmann
max (L.)) accessions revealed by high‐density SNPs. Frontiers in Plant
(Eds.), Genetic Diversity of Cultivated Tropical Plant (Ed., pp. 1–18).
Science, 8, 1–13. https​://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02014​
Montpellier: CRC Press. https​://doi.org/10.1201/97813​15154​695-1.
MoFA. (2016). Agriculture in Ghana, facts and figures. Ministry of Food
Earl, D. A., & vonHoldt, B. M. (2012). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A
and Agriculture, Statistics, Research and Information Directorate
website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and imple‐
(SRID), October 20(25th), 3137–3146. Retrieved from http://www.
menting the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4(2),
agrof​ood-westa​frica.com/filea​dmin/user_uploa​d/messe​n/agrof​ood-
359–361. https​://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
Westa​f rica/​B roch​ure/AGRIC​U LTURE-IN-GHANA-Facts-and-Figur​
Eujayl, I., Sorrells, M., Baum, M., Wolters, P., & Powell, W. (2001).
es-2015.pdf%0Ahtt ​p://cairn​gorms.co.uk/disco​ver-explo​r e/facts-
Assessment of genotypic variation among cultivated durum wheat
figur​es/.
based on EST‐SSRS and genomic SSRS. In Z. Bedö, & L. Láng (Eds.),
DENWAR et al. |
      11

MoFA‐SRID. (2007). “Agriculture in Ghana: Facts and figures (2005), Van Ee, J. H. (2009). Soy constituents: Modes of action in low‐density
Minist”, in Ministry Of Food and Agriculture / Statistics Research lipoprotein management. Nutrition Reviews, 67(4), 222–234. https​://
Information Directoriate (p. 18). doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00192.x
Mullis, K. B., & Faloona, F. A. (1987). Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via van Inghelandt, D., Melchinger, A. E., Lebreton, C., & Stich, B. (2010).
a polymerase‐catalyzed chain reaction. Methods in Enzymology, 155, Population structure and genetic diversity in a commercial maize
335–350. https​://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6 breeding program assessed with SSR and SNP markers. Theoretical
Perrier, X., & Jacquemoud, C.. (2009). Dissimilarity Analysis and and Applied Genetics, 120(7), 1289–1299. https​://doi.org/10.1007/
Representation for Windows. Retrieved from http://darwin.cirad.fr/. s00122-009-1256-2
May 10, 2018 Wang, M., Run‐zhi, L., Wan‐ming, Y., & Wei‐jun, D. (2010). Assessing
Perrier, X., & Jacquemoud-Collet, J. P. (2006). Darwin. http:// darwin. the genetic diversity of cultivars and wild soybeans using SSR mark‐
cirad.fr/darwin ers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(31), 4857–4866. https​://doi.
Priolli, R. H. G., Mendes‐Junior, C. T., Arantes, N. E., & Contel, E. P. B. org/10.5897/AJB09.1410
(2002). Characterization of Brazilian soybean cultivars using micro‐ Addinosoft. (2015). XLSTAT version 2015.2. Statistical software and
satellite markers. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 25(2), 185–193. data analysis add-on for Excell. http://www.xlstat.com/
https​://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572​0 0200 ​0200012 Xu, Y., Li, P., Yang, Z., & Xu, C. (2017). Genetic mapping of quantitative trait
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of pop‐ loci in crops. Crop Journal, 5(2), 175–184. https​://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ulation structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155(2), cj.2016.06.003
945–959. https​://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x Yu, H., Xie, W., Wang, J., Xing, Y., Xu, C., Li, X., Zhang, Q. (2011).
Rakoczy‐trojanowska, M., & Bolibok, H. (2004). Characteristics and Gains in QTL detection using an ultra‐high density SNP map
comparison of three classes of microsatellite‐based markers and based on population sequencing relative to traditional RFLP/SSR
their application in plants. DNA Sequence, 9(2), 221–238. https​://doi. markers. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e17595. https​ ://doi.org/10.1371/journ​
org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400854 al.pone.0017595.
Roberts, E. H., Qi, A., Ellis, R. H., Summerfield, R. J., Lawn, R. J., & Zhang, G., Xu, S., Mao, W., Hu, Q., & Gong, Y. (2013). Determination of
Shanmugasundaram, S. (1996). Use of field observations to charac‐ the genetic diversity of vegetable soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]
terise genotypic flowering responses to photoperiod and tempera‐ using EST‐SSR markers. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 14(4),
ture: A soyabean exemplar. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 93(4), 279–288. https​://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1200243
519–533. https​://doi.org/10.1007/BF004​17943​ Zhou, Z., Jiang, Y. u., Wang, Z., Gou, Z., Lyu, J., Li, W., … Tian, Z. (2015).
Rosenberg, N. A., Li, L. M., Ward, R., & Pritchard, J. K. (2003). Resequencing 302 wild and cultivated accessions identifies genes
Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry*. The related to domestication and improvement in soybean. Nature
American Journal of Human Genetics, 73(6), 1402–1422. https​://doi. Biotechnology, 33(4), 408–414. https​://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3096
org/10.1086/380416
Satué‐Gracia, M. T., Heinonen, M., & Frankel, E. N. (1997). Anthocyanins
as antioxidants on human low‐density lipoprotein and lecithin‐li‐
posome systems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45(9), S U P P O R T I N G I N FO R M AT I O N
3362–3367. https​://doi.org/10.1021/jf970​234a
Song, Q., Hyten, D. L., Jia, G., Quigley, C. V., Fickus, E. W., Nelson, R. L., & Additional supporting information may be found online in the
Cregan, P. B. (2013). Development and evaluation of SoySNP50K, a Supporting Information section at the end of the article.   
high‐density genotyping array for soybean. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54985.
https​://doi.org/10.1371/journ​al.pone.0054985.
Tiwari, K. L., Jadhav, S. K., & Gupta, S. (2012). Modified CTAB tech‐
How to cite this article: Denwar NN, Awuku FJ, Diers B, et al.
nique for isolation of DNA from some medicinal plants. Research
Journal of Medicinal Plant, 6(1), 65–73. https​ ://doi.org/10.3923/ Genetic diversity, population structure and key phenotypic
rjmp.2012.65.73 traits driving variation within soyabean (Glycine max)
Torres, A. R., Grunvald, A. K., Martins, T. B., dos Santos, M. A., Lemos, collection in Ghana. Plant Breed. 2019;00:1–11. https​://doi.
N. G., Silva, L. A. S., & Hungria, M. (2015). Genetic structure and di‐
org/10.1111/pbr.12700​
versity of a soybean germplasm considering biological nitrogen fixa‐
tion and protein content. Scientia Agricola, 72(1), 47–52. https​://doi.
org/10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0039
United States Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistics
Service. (2018). National Statistics for Soybeans. Retrieved from https​://
www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/graph​ics/soyy1d.pdf

You might also like