You are on page 1of 8

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH

Phytother. Res. (2017)


Published online in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5892

Anti-Obesity Activity of Saringosterol Isolated


from Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt
Extract in 3T3-L1 Cells

Jung A Lee, Young-Rak Cho, Seong Su Hong and Eun-Kyung Ahn*


Bio-Center, Gyeonggido Business and Science Accelerator, Gwanggyo-ro 147, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do 16229, Republic
of Korea

Saringosterol, a steroid isolated from Sargassum muticum, a brown edible alga widely distributed on the sea-
shores of southern and eastern Korea, has been shown to exhibit anti-obesity effect. In this study, we investigated
the anti-obesity activity of saringosterol through various experiments. The inhibitory effect of saringosterol on
adipogenesis was evaluated via Oil Red O staining in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. After confirming that saringosterol
is not cytotoxic to these cells by using the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, the
effect of saringosterol on the expression of various adipogenesis-related genes was analyzed via quantitative real-
time polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. We demonstrated that saringosterol dose dependently
inhibited adipocyte differentiation and expression of adipogenic marker genes such as adipocyte fatty acid-
binding protein, adiponectin, resistin, and fatty acid synthase in 3T3-L1 cells. In addition, saringosterol signifi-
cantly inhibited the mRNA and protein expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and CCAAT
enhancer-binding protein α in 3T3-L1 cells. Collectively, these findings indicate that saringosterol isolated from
S. muticum exhibits anti-obesity effect by inhibiting the expression of adipogenic transcription factors and
marker genes and that it may be developed as a drug to suppress adipogenesis. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: Sargassum muticum; saringosterol; adipogenic marker genes; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ; CCAAT en-
hancer-binding protein α; 3T3-L1 cells.

expressed during the differentiation of preadipocytes into


INTRODUCTION
adipocytes (Tontonoz et al., 1994; Brun et al., 1996;
Morrison and Farmer, 2000) and have been suggested as
Obesity is a common metabolic disease caused by a regulators of the expression of various proteins present in
combination of endocrine disorders, environmental fac- adipocytes, including adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein
tors, and genetic susceptibility. It is characterized by an (aP2), adiponectin, resistin, and fatty acid synthase (FAS)
excessive accumulation of fat in the body due to imbal- (Lowell, 1999; Rosen et al., 2000; Jeon et al., 2004).
ance between energy intake and consumption and is Sargassum muticum is a brown edible alga that is
usually associated with conditions such as diabetes, widely distributed on the seashores of southern and
hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular dis- eastern Korea. Previous studies have demonstrated that
eases (Kopelman, 2000; Spiegelman and Flier, 2001; S. muticum has anti-oxidant, anti-bacterial, and anti-
Vaneckova et al., 2014). The impact of obesity on global inflammatory properties (Kim et al., 2007; Yoon et al.,
public health has grown in recent years. 2010; Chae et al., 2013). Saringosterol, a steroid isolated
Adipocytes play an important role in energy from Sargassum sp., has been shown to inhibit the growth
homeostasis and lipid metabolism. The differentiation of of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Wachter et al., 2001), as
preadipocytes into adipocytes is regulated by various hor- well as exhibit anti-obesity effect through its lipase
mones and transcription factors, as well as by the intracellu- inhibitory activity (Kim et al., 2014). Furthermore,
lar accumulation of fat (Spiegelman and Flier, 2001; Rosen 24(S)-saringosterol has been reported as a cholesterol-
and Spiegelman, 2006). Peroxisome proliferator-activated lowering agent based on its liver X receptor-β agonist func-
receptor γ (PPARγ) and CCAAT enhancer-binding tion (Chen et al., 2014). However, there is no report to date
protein α (C/EBPα) are crucial transcription factors in on the anti-obesity effect of saringosterol involving PPARγ
adipogenesis; PPARγ is a member of the PPAR subfamily and C/EBPα expression with regard to adipogenesis.
of nuclear non-steroid hormone receptors, while C/EBPα In this study, we investigated whether saringosterol
is a leucine zipper transcription factor. They are highly isolated from S. muticum exhibits inhibitory activity on
adipocyte differentiation and adipogenic mediator ex-
pression in preadipocytes. Our results demonstrated
* Correspondence to: Eun-Kyung Ahn, Bio-Center, Gyeonggido Business
and Science Accelerator, Gwanggyo-ro 147, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si,
that saringosterol reduced lipid accumulation and
Gyeonggi-do, 16229, Republic of Korea inhibited 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation by sup-
E-mail: aek@gbsa.or.kr pressing the expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα.

Received 17 March 2017


Revised 27 June 2017
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 21 July 2017
J.A. LEE ET AL.

10:90 (A:B v/v); 20 min 0:100 (A:B v/v); 30 min 0:100


MATERIALS AND METHODS
(A:B v/v). The mobile phase was prepared daily, filtered
through a 0.45 mm, WTP 0.5 mm membrane (Whatman,
Preparation of S. muticum extract. Whole plants of S. Maidstone, UK), sonicated before use, and delivered at
muticum were provided by the Jeju Biodiversity Research a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was
Institute, Jeju, Republic of Korea, in September 2013. 20 μL, and the column temperature was at 30°C. All
The identity of the plant material was established by one the operations, the acquiring and analysis of data, were
of the authors (Seong Su Hong), and a voucher specimen controlled by Empower™ 3 software (Waters Co., Mil-
(G40) was deposited at the Bio-Center, Gyeonggido ford, MA, USA). The HPLC chromatogram data in-
Business and Science Accelerator, Suwon-si, Republic cluding saringosterol is presented in Fig. 1B. And
of Korea. Dried whole plants (2 kg) were pulverized and HPLC chromatogram data and 13C-NMR spectrum data
extracted with EtOH (3 × 15 L) at room temperature of saringosterol are shown Fig. 1C and D, respectively.
(20–25°C) for 24 h.

Cell culture and adipocyte differentiation. Mouse 3T3-


Isolation and identification of saringosterol. The ethanol L1 cells were purchased from American Type Culture
extract of S. muticum was filtered, concentrated in vacuo, Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). The cells
suitably diluted with water, and partitioned with were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s me-
n-hexane, CH2Cl2, EtOAc, and n-BuOH. The CH2Cl2 dium (DMEM; ATCC) containing 10% bovine calf se-
extract (14 g) was subjected to column chromatography rum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin
over silica gel (n-hexane/CHCl3, 1:1 to 0:1; CHCl3/ace- (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), in a humidified atmo-
tone, 70:1 to 2:1) to yield 11 fractions (G40-21-1–11). sphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. Two days after the cells
The G40-21-9 (499 mg) fraction was separated on a C18 reached confluence, they were incubated with MDI
RP silica gel column (MeOH/H2O, 3:7 to 1:0) to afford (1 μΜ dexamethasone (Calbiochem, Billerica, MA,
11 subfractions (G40-25-1–11). Subfraction G40-25-1 USA), 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX;
(208 mg) was further purified via preparative HPLC Calbiochem), and 1 μg/mL insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St.
(Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) by eluting with MeOH/H2O Louis, MO, USA)) in DMEM containing 10% fetal bo-
(78:22) at 12 mL/min to yield saringosterol (23.1 mg). vine serum (FBS; ATCC). On day 2, the medium was
Its NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ascend III changed to DMEM containing 1 μg/mL insulin and
700 spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) using 10% FBS. The progression medium was then changed
tetramethylsilane as an internal standard, with chemical to DMEM containing 10% FBS every 2 days (days 4
shifts expressed in δ. Electrospray ionization mass and 6). The cells were treated with different concentra-
spectra were obtained with a LTQ Orbitrap XL mass tions of saringosterol from days 0 to 8.
spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Oil Red O staining. Eight days after induction of adipo-


Saringosterol. White amorphous powder; 1H-NMR cyte differentiation, 3T3-L1 cells were washed with
(CDCl3, 700 MHz) δ 5.83 (1H, ddd, J = 17.5, 11.2, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed with 3.7% form-
4.2 Hz, H-28), 5.37 (1H, brs, H-6), 5.21 (1H, dd, aldehyde in PBS for 30 min, and washed twice with PBS
J = 17.5, 4.2 Hz, H-29), 5.16 (1H, dd, J = 11.2, 4.2 Hz, H- and 70% ethanol. The cells were then stained with Oil
29), 3.55 (1H, m, H-3), 1.03 (3H, s, Me-19), 0.95 (3H, d, Red O (Sigma-Aldrich) in isopropyl alcohol/distilled
J = 6.3 Hz, Me-21), 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, Me-26), 0.89 water for 30 min and washed with 70% ethanol and
(3H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, Me-27), 0.69 (3H, s, Me-18); 13C– PBS. Stained lipid droplets were observed with a micro-
NMR (CDCl3, 175 MHz) δ 37.2 (C-1), 31.7 (C-2), 71.8 scope (TE2000-U; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and dissolved
(C-3), 42.3 (C-4), 140.8 (C-5), 121.7 (C-6), 31.9 (C-7), in isopropyl alcohol containing 4% Nonidet P-40
31.9 (C-8), 50.1 (C-9), 36.5 (C-10), 21.1 (C-11), 39.7 (C- (Sigma-Aldrich) before quantification with a microplate
12), 42.3 (C-13), 56.7 (C-14), 24.3 (C-15), 28.2 (C-16), reader (SpectraMax 190PC; Molecular Devices, Sunny-
55.8 (C-17), 11.9 (C-18), 19.4 (C-19), 35.9 (C-20), 18.8 vale, CA, USA) at 510 nm.
(C-21), 29.1 (C-22), 34.8 (C-23), 77.7 (C-24), 36.1 (C-
25), 16.5 (C-26), 17.6 (C-27), 142.6 (C-28), 112.9 (C-29);
electrospray ionization MS (positive mode) m/z 451 Measurement of triglyceride contents and glycerol re-
[M + Na]+. The structure of saringosterol is presented lease. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were incubated in the presence
in Fig. 1A (Sheu and Sung, 1991). of saringosterol at concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 μM
in 24-well plates during 8 days after the initiation of dif-
ferentiation. Triglyceride (TG) contents were deter-
Apparatus and chromatographic conditions. HPLC mined using triglyceride assay kit according to the
analysis was performed on a Waters Alliance (Waters manufacturer’s instructions (Zen-Bio, Research Triangle
Co., Milford, MA, USA) system composed of a 2998 Park, NC, USA) with a microplate reader at 540 nm. And
photodiode array detector and e2695 separation mod- glycerol release levels were measured using the free glyc-
ule. The separation was achieved using a YMC-Triart erol assay kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol
C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm particle size) (BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA). The differentiated
(YMC Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). The mobile phase 3T3-L1 cells treated in DMEM with saringosterol of 50,
consisted of water–trifluoroacetic acid (99.95:0.05; v/v) 100, and 200 μM for 24 h. The media were collected
(solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The elution and assayed for glycerol with a microplate reader at
was performed using the following gradient: initial 570 nm.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. (2017)
ANTI-OBESITY ACTIVITY OF SARINGOSTEROL

Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of saringosterol. (A) Structure of saringosterol isolated from S. muticum. (B) HPLC chromatogram (205 nm)
13
of S. muticum extract. (C) HPLC chromatogram (205 nm) of saringosterol. (D) C-NMR spectrum of saringosterol (CDCl3, 175 MHz).
[Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Cell viability assay. 3T3-L1 cell viability was determined Saringosterol (12.5–200 μM) was applied directly, and
using 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazo- the cells were incubated for 24 h in a humidified 5%
lium bromide (MTT; Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. The MTT solution (5 mg/mL
The Netherlands) assay. Cells were plated on 96-well in PBS) was then added to each well, followed by incu-
plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well in culture me- bation for 3 h. The medium was removed from the wells
dium. After 24 h, a time zero control plate was made. by aspiration. Subsequently, 0.1 mL of buffered
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. (2017)
J.A. LEE ET AL.

dimethyl sulfoxide was added to each well, and the plate


RESULTS
was shaken to dissolve the formazan. Absorbance was
measured with a microtiter plate reader at 540 nm.
Effects of saringosterol on cell viability and lipid
accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR analysis. We first examined the cytotoxicity of saringosterol in
Differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were harvested and washed 3T3-L1 cells. The cells were treated with increasing
with PBS. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent doses (12.5–200 μM) of saringosterol, and cell prolifera-
(Invitrogen) and quantified with a spectrophotometer tion was determined using MTT assay. The different
(SD2000; Bioprince™ Technology Development Co., concentrations of saringosterol were not cytotoxic to
Seoul, Korea) by measuring the absorbance at 260 and 3T3-L1 cells (Fig. 2A). Subsequently, the inhibitory ef-
280 nm. cDNA synthesis was performed using 1 μg of fect of saringosterol on adipocyte differentiation was
total RNA with the SuperScript® III first-strand synthe- assessed using MDI differentiation medium (containing
sis system (Invitrogen). The synthesized cDNA was am- dexamethasone, IBMX, and insulin) to induce the dif-
plified using specific primers with the SYBR Premix Ex ferentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. After 8 days, cells
Taq system (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). The primers used treated with 50, 100, and 200 μM saringosterol were
in the experiments are shown in Table 1. Glyceralde- stained with Oil Red O and observed under a micro-
hyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as the in- scope. Saringosterol treatment significantly suppressed
variant control. adipocyte differentiation in a dose-dependent manner.
Lipid droplet accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes
treated with 50, 100, and 200 μM saringosterol de-
Western blot analysis. 3T3-L1 cells were lysed on ice for creased to 56.5, 47.3, and 26.6%, respectively, relative
30 min in RIPA buffer containing a cocktail of protease to that in untreated cells (Fig. 2B and C). Also, TG con-
inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were centrifuged tents were observed in 3T3-L1 cells (Fig. 2D). TG accu-
at 16,000g for 30 min at 4°C to obtain the supernatant. mulation was reduced with 50, 100, and 200 μM of
The cell lysates (50 μg) were separated on an 8% SDS saringosterol compared with differentiated adipocytes.
polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto nitrocellulose We determined the effect of saringosterol on glycerol
membranes (Whatman, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein release in the media of 3T3-L1 cells. As shown in
expression was analyzed by immunoblotting with anti- Fig. 2E, saringosterol increased glycerol release levels
bodies against PPARγ, C/EBPα (1:1000; Cell Signaling in 3T3-L1 cells. These results clearly indicate that
Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and β-actin (1:1000; saringosterol isolated from S. muticum inhibited lipid
Cell Signaling Technology). Horseradish peroxidase- and TG accumulation and induced glycerol secretion
conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (1:5000; Cell Signaling in 3T3-L1 cells in a dose-dependent manner, without in-
Technology) were used as secondary antibodies. The ducing cytotoxicity.
proteins were detected with SuperSignal® West Pico
chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific) using
the Amersharm Imager 600 (GE Healthcare Life Sci- Effect of saringosterol on the expression of PPARγ and
ences, Chicago, IL, USA). C/EBPα at mRNA and protein levels in 3T3-L1 cells

Both PPARγ and C/EBPα play important roles in cellu-


Statistical analysis. Data are expressed as means ± stan- lar responses related to lipid accumulation and adipo-
dard deviation (SD). Experimental results were ana- cyte differentiation (Gregoire et al., 1998; Rosen et al.,
lyzed for statistical significance using Student’s t-test 2002). In view of the inhibitory activity of saringosterol
and one-way analysis of variance. Values of *p < 0.05 on adipocyte differentiation, we examined the expres-
and **p < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. sion of PPARγ and C/EBPα in 3T3-L1 cells using

Table 1. Primer sequences used for real-time PCR

Target Primer sequences Accession no.

GAPDH 50 -GTATGACTCCACTCACGGCAAA-30 (sense) BC083080


50 -GGTGTGGCTCCTGGAAGATG-30 (antisense)
PPARγ 50 -CGCTGATGCACTGCCTATGA-30 (sense) NM_011146
50 -AGAGGTCCACAGAGCTGATTCC-30 (antisense)
C/EBPα 50 -AGGTGCTGGAGTTGACCAGT-30 (sense) BC058161
50 -CAGCCTAGAGATCCAGCGAC-30 (antisense)
aP2 50 -CATGGCCAAGCCCAACAT-30 (sense) NM_024406
50 -CGCCCAGTTTGAAGGAAATC-30 (antisense)
Adiponectin 50 -AGCCTGGAGAAGCCGCTTAT-30 (sense) NM_009605
50 -TTGCAGTAGAACTTGCCAGTGC-30 (antisense)
Resistin 50 -TCAACTCCCTGTTTCCAAATGC-30 (sense) NM_022984
50 -TCTTCACGAATGTCCCACGA-30 (antisense)
FAS 50 -CTGAGATCCCAGCACTTCTTGA-30 (sense) NM_007988
50 -GCCTCCGAAGCCAAATGAG-30 (antisense)

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. (2017)
ANTI-OBESITY ACTIVITY OF SARINGOSTEROL

Figure 2. Effects of saringosterol on viability and adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. (A) 3T3-L1 cells were treated with increasing con-
centrations of saringosterol (12.5–200 μM) for 24 h. Cell viability was determined using MTT assay. (B and C) Eight days after the induction
of differentiation, the cells were stained with Oil Red O. (D) Quantification of triglyceride accumulation. (E) Glycerol release levels were mea-
sured using a free glycerol assay kit. Data are expressed as means ± SD of three replicates; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with MDI-
treated cells. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

quantitative real-time PCR and western blot. As 2004). Therefore, we investigated the effect of
shown Fig. 3, saringosterol treatment significantly saringosterol on the expression of adipogenic marker
inhibited the expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα at genes encoding the proteins aP2, adiponectin, resistin,
the mRNA level in 3T3-L1 cells. Likewise, we con- and FAS. On day 8, fully differentiated adipocytes were
firmed that saringosterol also suppressed the expres- treated with 100 and 200 μM saringosterol, and their
sion of PPARγ and C/EBPα at the protein level in mRNA expression was analyzed using quantitative
these cells (Fig. 4A and B). Furthermore, the inhibi- real-time PCR. As shown in Fig. 5, saringosterol treat-
tory effect of saringosterol on the protein expression ment effectively inhibited mRNA expression of aP2,
of PPARγ and C/EBPα was very similar in pattern adiponectin, resistin, and FAS. These findings suggest
to that of its inhibition of the mRNA expression of that saringosterol prevents adipocyte differentiation
PPARγ and C/EBPα (Figs. 3 and 4). and lipid accumulation through suppression of
adipogenic-related marker genes.

Effect of saringosterol on the expression of adipogenic


marker genes in 3T3-L1 cells
DISCUSSION
During 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation, PPARγ and
C/EBPα regulate the expression of various genes in- In our preliminary study, we examined the anti-
volved in adipogenesis (Rosen et al., 2000; Jeon et al., obesity effect of the ethanol extract of S. muticum
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. (2017)
J.A. LEE ET AL.

preadipocytes. First, we showed that saringosterol re-


duced lipid and TG contents in 3T3-L1 cells during
adipocyte differentiation without inducing cytotoxicity.
And we observed that saringosterol increased the
glycerol release in 3T3-L1 adipocyte (Fig. 2). This
finding led us to investigate its effect on the expres-
sion of transcription factors associated with adipogen-
esis. The transcription factors PPARγ and C/EBPα
are crucial in the process of cell differentiation by
which preadipocytes become adipocytes; PPARγ stim-
ulates lipoprotein lipase expression and promotes
fatty acid uptake, while C/EBPα induces terminal ad-
ipocyte differentiation. These two factors remain ele-
vated during the rest of the differentiation process
and life of the mature adipocyte (Brun et al., 1996;
Morrison and Farmer, 2000; Rosen, 2005). Accord-
ingly, many reports have associated suppression of
adipocyte differentiation with the downregulation of
PPARγ and/or C/EBPα (Tontonoz et al., 1995; Kang
et al., 2003; Farmer, 2005; Ahn et al., 2012).
In the present study, we demonstrated the inhibi-
tory effect of saringosterol on the expression of
PPARγ and C/EBPα at mRNA (Fig. 3) and protein
(Fig. 4) levels in fully differentiated 3T3-L1 cells
and showed that the inhibition of mRNA and protein
expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα followed a similar
pattern (Figs. 3 and 4). In addition, saringosterol
treatment decreased the mRNA expression of
adipocyte-specific genes such as aP2, adiponectin,
resistin, and FAS (Fig. 5). The induction of aP2 is
Figure 2. (continued) linked with PPARγ activation in fat cells, and to-
gether with adiponectin, they are both detected in
the adipose tissue during adipocyte differentiation
(Tontonoz et al., 1994; Glatz et al., 1995). Resistin is
and showed that it dose dependently inhibited lipid a polypeptide secreted by adipocytes that is involved
accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells based on Oil Red O in the regulation of glucose homeostasis, while FAS
staining result (data not shown). Isolation of the ac- is a crucial enzyme in fatty acid synthesis (Steppan
tive compound from this extract led to the identifica- et al., 2001; Rajala et al., 2003; Sul and Wang,
tion of saringosterol. Saringosterol has also previously 1998). Thus, inhibition of the expression of these
been isolated from other seaweeds such as S. fusi- molecules is associated with anti-obesity activity.
form, Lessonia nigrescens, and S. thunbergii (Wachter In conclusion, this is the first report to demonstrate
et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2001). that saringosterol isolated from S. muticum inhibited
Until recently, previous investigation about adipocyte differentiation via downregulation of PPARγ,
saringosterol has mainly reported on its lipase inhibi- C/EBPα, and adipogenic marker genes such as aP2,
tory activity with regard to its anti-obesity effect adiponectin, resistin, and FAS. These findings suggest
(Kim et al., 2014). In the present study, we assessed that saringosterol may be developed as a drug candi-
the anti-adipogenic effect of saringosterol in date for the prevention of obesity-related diseases.

Figure 3. Effect of saringosterol on the mRNA expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and CCAAT enhancer-binding pro-
tein α in 3T3-L1 cells. Post-confluent 3T3-L1 cells were differentiated in the absence or presence of saringosterol for 8 days. Gene expres-
sion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and CCAAT enhancer-binding protein α was evaluated via quantitative real-time PCR.
Data are expressed as means ± SD of three replicates; **p < 0.01, compared with MDI-treated cells.

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. (2017)
ANTI-OBESITY ACTIVITY OF SARINGOSTEROL

Figure 4. Effect of saringosterol on the protein expression of (A) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and (B) CCAAT en-
hancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα) in 3T3-L1 cells. Post-confluent 3T3-L1 cells were differentiated in the absence or presence of saringosterol
for 8 days. Protein expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα was analyzed by western blot with antibodies against PPARγ and C/EBPα. Data are
expressed as means ± SD of three replicates; **p < 0.01, compared with MDI-treated cells.

Figure 5. Effect of saringosterol on adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein, adiponectin, resistin, and fatty acid synthase gene expression in
3T3-L1 cells. Post-confluent 3T3-L1 cells were differentiated in the absence or presence of saringosterol for 8 days. mRNA expression of
adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein, adiponectin, resistin, and fatty acid synthase was evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR analysis.
Data are expressed as means ± SD of three replicates; **p < 0.01, compared with MDI-treated cells.

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. (2017)
J.A. LEE ET AL.

Acknowledgement Conflict of Interest


This research was supported by the High Value-Added Food Technol- The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
ogy Development Program (311027-03-3-CG000) of the Ministry for
Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Korea.

REFERENCES
Ahn EK, Lee JA, Seo DW, Hong SS, Oh JS. 2012. 1β-Hydroxy-2- impair insulin action on glucose production. J Clin Invest
oxopomolic acid isolated from Agrimonia pilosa extract in- 111: 225–230.
hibits adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. Biol Pharm Bull 35: Rosen ED. 2005. The transcriptional basis of adipocyte develop-
643–649. ment. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 73: 31–34.
Brun RP, Kim JB, Hu E, Altiok S, Spiegelman BM. 1996. Adipocyte Rosen ED, Hsu CH, Wang X, et al. 2002. C/EBPα induces adipo-
differentiation: a transcriptional regulatory cascade. Curr Opin genesis through PPARγ: a unified pathway. Genes Dev 16:
Cell Biol 8: 826–832. 22–26.
Chae D, Manzoor Z, Kim SC, et al. 2013. Apo-90 -fucoxanthinone, Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. 2006. Adipocytes as regulators of en-
isolated from Sargassum muticum, inhibits CpG-induced in- ergy balance and glucose homeostasis. Nature 444:
flammatory response by attenuating the mitogen-activated 847–853.
protein kinase pathway. Mar Drugs 11: 3272–3287. Rosen ED, Walkey CJ, Puigserver P, Spiegelman BM. 2000. Tran-
Chen Z, Liu J, Fu Z, et al. 2014. 24(S)-Saringosterol from edible scriptional regulation of adipogenesis. Genes Dev 14:
marine seaweed Sargassum fusiforme is a novel selective 1293–1307.
LXRβ agonist. J Agric Food Chem 62: 6130–6137. Sheu JH, Sung PJ. 1991. Isolation of 24-hydroperoxy-24-
Farmer SR. 2005. Regulation of PPARγ activity during adipogene- vinylcholesterol and fucosterol from the brown alga Turbinaria
sis. Int J Obes (Lond) 29: S13–S16. conoides. J Chin Chem Soc 38: 501–503.
Glatz JF, Borchers T, Spener F, van der Vusse GJ. 1995. Fatty Spiegelman BM, Flier JS. 2001. Obesity and the regulation of en-
acids in cell signaling: modulation by lipid binding protein. ergy balance. Cell 104: 531–543.
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 52: 121–127. Steppan CM, Bailey ST, Bhat S, et al. 2001. The hormoneresistin
Gregoire FM, Smas CM, Sul HS. 1998. Understanding adipocyte links obesity to diabetes. Nature 409: 307–312.
differentiation. Physiol Rev 78: 783–809. Sul HS, Wang D. 1998. Nutritional and hormonal regulation of en-
Jeon T, Hwang SG, Hirai S, et al. 2004. Red yeast rice extracts zymes in fat synthesis: studies of fatty acid synthase and mi-
suppress adipogenesis by down-regulating adipogenic tran- tochondrial glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gene
scription factors and gene expression in 3T3-L1 cells. Life transcription. Annu Rev Nutr 18: 331–351.
Sci 75: 3195–3203. Tontonoz P, Graves RA, Budavari AI, et al. 1994. Adipocyte-spe-
Kang K, Liu W, Albright KJ, Park Y, Pariza MW. 2003. trans-10,cis- cific transcription factor ARF6 is heterodimeric complex of
12 CLA inhibits differentiation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes and de- two nuclear hormone receptors, PPAR7 and RXRα. Nucleic
creases PPARγ expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun Acids Res 22: 5628–5634.
303: 795–799. Tontonoz P, Hu E, Devine J, Beale EG, Spiegelman BM. 1995.
Kim KB, Kim MJ, Ahn DH. 2014. Lipase inhibitory activity of chlo- PPARγ2 regulates adipose expression of the phosphoenolpyr-
rophyll a, isofucosterol and saringosterol isolated from chloro- uvate carboxykinase gene. Mol Cell Biol 15: 351–357.
form fraction of Sargassum thunbergii. Nat Prod Res 28: Vaneckova I, Maletinska L, Behuliak M, Nagelova V, Zicha J, Kunes
1310–1312. J. 2014. Obesity-related hypertension: possible pathophysio-
Kim JY, Lee JA, Kim KN, Yoon WJ, Lee WJ, Park SY. 2007. Antiox- logical mechanisms. J Endocrinol 223: R63–R78.
idative and antimicrobial activities of Sargassum muticum ex- Wachter GA, Franzblau SG, Montenegro G, Hoffmann JJ, Maiese
tracts. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 36: 663–669. WM, Timmermann BN. 2001. Inhibition of mycobacterium tu-
Kopelman PG. 2000. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 404: berculosis growth by saringosterol from Lessonia nigrescens.
635–643. J Nat Prod 64: 1463–1464.
Lowell BB. 1999. PPARγ: an essential regulator of adipogenesis Xu S, Cen Y, Cai L, Li Y, Xu S. 2001. Studies on the chemical com-
and modulator of fat cell function. Cell 99: 239–242. ponents fromSargassum fusiform. Zhong Yao Cai 24:
Morrison RF, Farmer SR. 2000. Hormonal signaling and transcrip- 491–492.
tional control of adipocyte differentiation. J Nutr 130: Yoon WJ, Ham YM, Lee WJ, Lee NH, Hyun CG. 2010. Brown alga
3116S–3121S. Sargassum muticum inhibits proinflammatory cytokine, iNOS,
Rajala MW, Obici S, Scherer PE, Rossetti L. 2003. Adipose-derived and COX-2 expression in macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. Turk
resistin and gut-derived resistin-like molecule-β selectively J Biol 34: 25–34.

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. (2017)

You might also like