Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OPEN DOCUMENT
In the beginning of this argument (Plato and Zeyl 39), the question from Socrates to Polus is which is worse, doing what’s unjust or suffering it? Polus responds that
suffering is worse and Socrates proceeds to ask which is more shameful doing what is unjust or suffering from it. Polus says doing what is unjust is more shameful
which leads Socrates to ask if doing an injustice is more shameful then shouldn’t it be worse. Polus states that is not the case which leads Socrates to believe that
Polus believes there is a difference between what is admirable and what is good and also what is shameful and bad. Polus says he does believe there is a difference,
Socrates gives an argument (Plato and Zeyl p39 474d-e) basically saying that there is no difference in what is admirable/good and what is bad/shameful. He uses
bodies for examples saying that when we see someone as admirable whether they are useful to us or just pleasing to look at, it brings us some pleasure which is
good. Polus responds by not necessarily agreeing with Socrates but instead responding in a way to where he is not admitting that he may be wrong.
Socrates then proceeds to say that whenever we have two admirable things and we choose that one is more admirable than the other, it is on the basis that one
gives us more pleasure, is more useful or both. He also states that the situation is likewise in the case of when we have to things that are shameful and we choose
that one is more shameful on the basis that one is more evil, painful or both (Plato and Zeyl p. 41 475a-b). Polus agrees and then Socrates refers to Polus saying
that suffering is more evil but doing an injustice is more shameful. Polus agrees that he said that which leads Socrates to state that if doing an unjust is more
shameful than suffering it then it is because it is more painful, evil, or both (Plato and Zeyl p41 475b) as he stated in his argument earlier. He then goes on to ask that
is the person doing the unjust hurt more than the people suffering the unjust. Polus says no, and Socrates then goes on to ask does it surpass it in pain or both.
Polus says no which leads Socrates to state that the only thing left to surpass it in is evil. Socrates then proceeds to say that since it surpasses it in evil then doing an
injustice is more evil than suffering. Polus confirms the statements Socrates is saying without really saying that Socrates is right (Plato and Zeyl p41 475c). Socrates
then refers that earlier in the argument Polus agreed with him that doing what is unjust is more shameful than suffering. Polus agrees and Socrates then says it must
be more evil as well to which Polus answers the question in a wise guy sort of way. Socrates then calls him out and basically tells him to stop being a smart-aleck
and answer yes or no to the question of would he do something that was more evil and shameful over something less evil and shameful. Polus says no and Socrates
then goes on to say that he is right in the case of no person would do what’s unjust over suffering what’s unjust because it is more evil. Polus is backed in a corner at
SHOW
this point because he basically agreed with Socrates and it conflicts with the MOREhe made at the beginning of the argument which was suffering an injustice is
statement
more evil than doing an injustice so he simply
Antigone Paper
for the sake of the consequences that would occur if she was not good and obedient. She is only interested in herself and gaining
benefits from her actions. For Ismene it all comes from the head not the heart. Ismene portrays the third good of Plato in which “We do
not welcome them for their own sake, but we do welcome. We do welcome because of what comes from it”. Ismene is the weak soul who
only acts for the sake of the consequences that will precede her actions. As seen develop as the plays…
Definition Of Piety
Andrew Ozomaro Paper 1 – Plato In philosophy, in order to make sound arguments, we must be careful to draw a distinction between
subjective and object conclusions and claims. Objective claims are presumed to be without personal influence and moreover an
independent observer can recognize the observations of such claims. Objective concepts and objects thus cannot be considered
arbitrary in their essence. In Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates and Euthyphro contemplate the objective meaning of piety. Many…
* Test names and other trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders. home help contact
None of the trademark holders are affiliated with this website. Virtual Writing Center privacy advertise
terms link to us
copyright sitemap
All content of site and tests copyright © 2021 Study Mode, LLC. CA Privacy
Policy