Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inflation and Unemployment are two important concepts in macroeconomics which have
implications on the economy of a country. In order to reduce their effect on an economy, it is
important to understand the relationship between them. According to Phillips Curve, inflation
and rate of unemployment are inversely related, in other words there exists a trade-off
between inflation and unemployment. Efforts to reduce unemployment result in increased
inflation and vice-versa. Understanding the trade-off and making a choice has policy
implications while handling supply shocks, bringing inflation to a stable level and creating
strategies for the growth of the economy.
SCOPE
Based on the data related to inflation and unemployment in India, it is established that
Inflation and unemployment in India are inversely related in the short term. It is also
observed that the government will not be able to reduce the unemployment rate for an
extended period by increasing wage rates.
BACKGROUND
What is Unemployment?
Unemployment is a situation when a person actively searches for a job and is unable to find
work. Unemployment indicates the health of the economy.
The unemployment rate is the most frequent measure of unemployment. The unemployment
rate is the number of people unemployed divided by the working population or people
working under labour force.
Unemployment rate = (Unemployed Workers / Total labour force) × 100
National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) defines employment and unemployment on
the following activity statuses of an individual. NSSO, an organization under MoSPI –
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation measures India’s unemployment on
three approaches:
Causes of Unemployment
The major causes of unemployment in India are as mentioned below:
Large population.
Lack of vocational skills or low educational levels of the working population.
Labour-intensive sectors suffering from the slowdown in private investment
particularly after demonetisation
The low productivity in the agriculture sector plus the lack of alternative opportunities
for agricultural workers that makes transition among the three sectors difficult.
Legal complexities, Inadequate state support, low infrastructural, financial and market
linkages to small businesses making such enterprises unviable with cost and
compliance overruns.
Inadequate growth of infrastructure and low investments in the manufacturing sector,
hence restricting the employment potential of the secondary sector.
The huge workforce of the country is associated with the informal sector because of a
lack of required education or skills, and this data is not captured in employment
statistics.
The main cause of structural unemployment is the education provided in schools and
colleges are not as per the current requirements of the industries.
Regressive social norms that deter women from taking/continuing employment.
Impact of Unemployment
The unemployment in any nation have the following effects on the economy:
Unemployment in India
Unemployment Rate in India decreased to 4.90 percent in 2013 from 5.20 percent
in 2012.
Unemployment Rate in India averaged 7.32 percent from 1983 until 2013,
reaching an all-time high of 9.40 percent in 2009 and a record low of 4.90 percent
in 2013.
Unemployment Rate in India is reported by the Ministry of Labour and
Employment, India.
According to “Annual Employment and Unemployment Survey Report 2013-14”
the rates of unemployment on Usual Principal State (UPS) in the country as
follows.
o Aggregate Unemployment Rate – 4.7%
o Unemployment Rate in rural areas- 4.9 %
o Unemployment Rate in urban areas- 5.5 %
o State having maximum unemployment people Sikkim
o State having the least unemployed people – Chhattisgarh
o State having maximum unemployment rate – Kerala
INFLATION
Inflation is a sustained increase in prices, as measured by some broad index (consumer price
index) over months or years, and reflected in the correspondingly decreasing purchasing
power of the currency.
There are three major types of inflation.
Cost-push inflation is due to wage increases that cause businesses to raise prices to
cover higher labor costs, which leads to demand for still higher wages.
Demand-pull inflation results from increasing consumer demand financed by easier
availability of credit.
Monetary inflation is caused by the expansion in money supply.
Deflation is downturn in an economic cycle caused by circumstances, or brought
about by government policies. Inflation may or may not result in higher levels of
output and employment, significant deflation always results in lower output and
employment.
Hyperinflation is caused due to ruinously high increase (50 percent or more per
month) in prices due to the near total collapse of a country’s monetary system
rendering its currency almost worthless as a medium of exchange.
Measurement of Inflation
The effect of inflation is not distributed evenly in the economy. There are chances of
hidden costs for different goods and services in the economy.
Sudden or unpredictable inflation rates are harmful to an overall economy. They lead
to market instability and thereby make it difficult for companies to plan a budget for
the long-term.
Inflation can act as a drag on productivity as companies are forced to mobilize
resources away from products and services to handle the situations of profit and losses
from inflation.
Moderate inflation enables labour markets to reach equilibrium at a faster pace.
PHILIPS CURVE
Short-Run Phillips Curve: The short-run Phillips curve shows that in the short-term there is
a trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Contrast it with the long-run Phillips curve
(in red), which shows that over the long term, unemployment rate stays more or less steady
regardless of inflation rate.
Historical application
During the 1960’s, the Phillips curve rose to prominence because it seemed to accurately
depict real-world macroeconomics. However, the stagflation of the 1970’s shattered any
illusions that the Phillips curve was a stable and predictable policy tool. Nowadays, modern
economists reject the idea of a stable Phillips curve, but they agree that there is a trade-off
between inflation and unemployment in the short-run. Given a stationary aggregate supply
curve, increases in aggregate demand create increases in real output. As output increases,
unemployment decreases. With more people employed in the workforce, spending within the
economy increases, and demand-pull inflation occurs, raising price levels.
Therefore, the short-run Phillips curve illustrates a real, inverse correlation between
inflation and unemployment, but this relationship can only exist in the short run. The
idea of a stable trade-off between inflation and unemployment in the long run has been
disproved by economic history.
FINDINGS & ANALYSIS
INFLATION IN INDIA
Table 3.1 and Figure 3.1 below feature an overview of the inflation in India for a period of 10
years (2004 to 2014).
India used Wholesale Price Index (WPI) as the measure for inflation but new Consumer Price
Index (CPI) is declared as a new standard to measure inflation.
For Wholesale Price Index, 2004-2005 has been taken as the base year. WPI included 3
categories of items:
• Primary Articles
• Fuel, Power, Light and Lubricants
• Manufactured Products
This practice has been discontinued since 2012, when CPI system was reformed.
India has seen both high and low inflation, and plotting the graph since 1953 puts things in
perspective.
Fuelled by rising wages, property prices and food prices inflation in India today is an
increasing problem. Inflation is currently around 8%. This inflation has been a problem
despite periods of economic slowdown. For example, in late 2013, Indian inflation reached
11%, despite growth falling to 4.8%. This suggests that inflation is not just due to excess
demand, but is also related to cost push inflationary factors. For example, supply constraints
in agriculture have caused rising food prices. This causes inflation and is also a major factor
reducing living standards of the poor who are sensitive to food prices. The Central Bank of
India have made efforts for reducing inflation a top priority and have been willing to raise
interest rates in order to curb inflation, but cost push inflation is more difficult to solve and it
may cause a fall in growth as they try to reduce inflation.
In India, National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) calculates the unemployment rates
every 5 years, so the unemployment numbers during the 5 years’ gap is not known accurately.
Labour Bureau of the Government of India started conducting surveys on employment-
unemployment in 2009-2010 and based on that they came up with an unemployment rate.
As per Labour Bureau of the Government of India, the unemployment rate in 2009-2010 was
9.4%, and it was split out as 10.1% in rural areas and 7.3% in urban areas. The
unemployment rate is calculated as a percentage of labor force and not the total population.
Table 3.2 gives the Estimated Unemployment Rate from year 2004-05 to 2013-14.
2004-05 9.2
2005-06 8.9
2006-07 7.8
2007-08 7.2
2008-09 6.8
2009-10 9.4
2010-11 9.4
2011-12 9.8
2012-13 8.5
2013-14 8.8
Table 3.2.1: Unemployment Rate in India
Unemployment Rate
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Unemployment Rate
The National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) released the findings of the Employment and
Unemployment Survey 2011-12 in June, 2013. The EUS 2009-10 had shown that
employment growth by various indicators was far below expectations. The findings of the
survey reveal that over nine million persons found employment between 2009-10 and 2011-
12. It must also be noticed that the average growth in employment between 2004-05 and
2011-12 remains low at 2.5 million per year. Also, a growing proportion of the workforce is
moving to non-farm activities, and a falling proportion is engaged on a casual wage.
The Government of India has taken several steps to decrease the unemployment rates like
launching the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme which
guarantees a 100 day employment to an unemployed person in a year. It has implemented it
in 200 of the districts and further will be expanded to 600 districts. In exchange for working
under this scheme the person is paid 150 per day.
The inverse relationship in the above chart proves the negative relationship between inflation
and unemployment rate.
Why the Indian government is unable to reduce unemployment in India in the long run
using inflation?
According to the Phillips Curve increasing wage rates will not help to reduce the
unemployment level indefinitely. As increase in wage rates initially reduces unemployment
by inducing more people to work. However, it also leads to overall increase in prices as
employers have to compensate for higher wage rates by charging higher prices. This reduces
the real wage of workers and unemployment rate again Increases to the previous level. At the
same time prices have increased. The overall effect is that unemployment fluctuates around
its natural rate which is high in India and prices continue to rise
In the graph below we have shown the trends for inflation and unemployment from 2004-05
to 2013-14.
We can see that the inflation line is upward sloping, this is mainly due to rising food, fuel
prices etc. But the unemployment trend instead to falling (as inflation increases) is a
horizontal line showing that the unemployment rate remains constant in the long run.
For a country like India where inflation is a very relevant issues it is not possible to increase
employment at the cost of rising prices.