Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/288992657
CITATIONS READS
2 3,291
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by A.Zafer Acar on 23 January 2017.
Batuhan Kocaoglu*
Department of Logistics,
Okan University,
Istanbul, Turkey
Email: batuhan.kocaoglu@gmail.com
*Corresponding author
A. Zafer Acar
International Logistics and Transportation Department,
Piri Reis University,
Istanbul, Turkey
Email: azacar@pirireis.edu.tr
areas of research and lecturing are MIS, production planning, SCM, ERP and
logistics information systems in SMEs. He has many articles in international
conferences and journals.
1 Introduction
The term, ‘supply chain management’ (SCM), has risen to a reputable place over the last
ten years. According to Christopher (2011), a supply chain is “a network of organizations
that are involved, through upstream and downstream linkages, in the different processes
and activities that produce value in the form of products and services in the hands of the
ultimate customer”. The use of supply chain as a management concept has matured over
a period of time and several researchers gave their insights to make the SCM system
more robust, flexible and adaptable to each kind of organisation (Singh and Acharya,
2014). In recent years, because of the effects of new competitive global environment
created by economic, demographic and political developments, good management of
supply chains became increasingly important. SCM is an integrative philosophy to
manage the process which raw material is manufactured into final products and then
through distribution to ultimate customers, delivered by retail or both (Horvath, 2001;
Monczka and Morgan, 1997; Srinivas, 2002). Today, supply chain (SC) applications
being effective solutions to gain competitive advantage, and also firms benefit from them
to create cost advantage and customer satisfaction. SCM has become very important
technology management concept to attain the quality consciousness (Charkha and Jaju,
2014). As a result of the globalisation of the world economy, competition between
companies has risen rapidly and has become overwhelming. In such a harsh environment,
companies that need to survive have to increase quality and productivity (Şimşek, 2000).
So, businesses must adapt the environment where increased international competition,
differentiation of the customer needs and the advent of a global market insight.
By understanding, shaping and implementation of best management practices to the
business processes, they can be reached lower costs and higher responsiveness and
competitiveness.
Because of these global circumstances, today, competition is not between companies,
they are among SCs. According to Christopher (2011), “leading edge companies have
realized that the real competition is not company against company, but rather supply
chain against supply chain”. The goal of SC has become a common goal of every
Process development in customer order information systems 211
company. Cost and service improvements which cannot be achieved by individual firms
can be achieved by firms which are in cooperation with others (Lancioni, 2000).
Operation of the communication channels fast and accurate by the members of the SC,
effects on the competitiveness. To create a competitive strategy of a firm is so crucial in
order to survive. A firm, to increase its market share, has to recognise the activities of the
other firms very well and should draw a road map accordingly.
Responding customer need and requirement are vital, as well, to sustain competitive
advantage and to hold current market share. Customer service requirements are essential
as they deal with providing reliable and on-time replies, where the customers are
interested in the length of time they will have to wait to receive their quotation. Often,
customers have an upper time limit for their desired quotation, if the time exceeds that, a
customer will either go elsewhere for his requirements, or even cancel his inquiry (or
order) entirely (Rushton et al., 2006).
On the other hand, in practice, SC needs to be flexible for both internally and
externally integration and changing customer needs. Ragatz et al. (1997) claimed that
effective integration of suppliers into product value/supply chains will be a key factor for
some manufacturers in achieving the improvements necessary to remain competitive.
Today, beyond the integration of suppliers, integration through the whole supply chain is
a key strategic priority for firms striving to achieve efficiency and responsiveness in their
supply chain (Hong et al., 2008). In this context, SC practices should be flexible in order
to changing external environment, and be integrated into the corporate systems through
process development (PD) efforts. Information technologies (IT) as a key tool which
maintain coordination between SC participants and provide solutions may offer strategic
supports through removing widespread waste of resources (Güleş et al., 2005).
Additionally, those inter organisational information systems provide the technology
infrastructure to facilitate the horizontal flow of information along strategic business
partners and vertical flow of information and goods along shippers and consignees (Lai,
2008).
So, the performance of a SC participant firm affects both itself and SC performance.
Thus to improve its performance firms need to measure their SC performance. Of course,
firms can use many techniques to measure the performance of the SC, but one of the most
important performance criteria is known to be performance metrics based on time.
In theory, an integrated enterprise resource planning (ERP) system that allows
information to transparently flow inside and outside an enterprise would benefit a firm’s
supply chain efficiency (Hsu, 2013). Therefore the main purpose of this study is to
develop a more efficient order management strategy for a SMEs through IT-based
PD activities in order gain competitive advantage by increasing time-based performance
in order cycle time. Thus, this study aims to check inquiries in a way that fulfils financial
risks and customer service requirements for a more effective order management. Most
importantly, this study also takes into account the consequences a pre-sales
implementation can have on sales cycle performance. To this extend this paper is divided
in five parts. After this section a comprehensive literature review on sales order process is
replaced. Third chapter consists of order processing by using information systems. In the
fourth chapter a case study is elaborated and an order processing model was developed.
Results and conclusion are given in the last section with some implications to the
managers and researchers.
212 B. Kocaoglu and A.Z. Acar
allow salespeople to check in real time whether a product is available in stock and to
enter orders instantaneously. Electronic data interchange (EDI) allows companies to enter
orders for industrial goods directly on the seller’s computer without any paperwork
(Ghiani et al., 2004).
‘Order cycle time’ term defined as the time between when a customer order, or
service request is placed and when the product or service is received by the customer
(Ballou, 2004). According to Handfield and Nichols (2002), ‘cycle time’ is the time
required to complete a business process. Here, the ‘real work’ performed during a
business process only corresponds to a small percentage (e.g., three to five percent) of the
total elapsed time. The rest of the time is typically employed to other counterproductive,
time-consuming activities and events. It is therefore possible to improve cycle time by
eliminating and or minimising these time-consuming activities that exist (Khan, 2011).
This shows the importance that organisations are competing on the basis of time and
performance. It does not only depend on superior cost, quality, delivery and technological
performance. However, reducing the time needed to provide the end customer with
products or services results in better customer satisfaction. Therefore, companies should
find ways to improve their cycle time performance by finding common causes that exist
behind it (Handfield and Nichols, 2002; Khan, 2011).
Figure 1 Typical elements of order processing (see online version for colours)
A customer places or sends an order and the time the seller receives the order
(Ballou, 2004). Order transmission can be done in two ways.
a Manual transmission: Mailing of orders or physical carrying by the sales
staff to the order entry point. This option is slow but inexpensive.
b Electronic transmission: Using telephone, EDI, satellite communication.
This method is fast, reliable and accurate, but it allows trade-off analysis.
Step 2 Order processing (order receipt and order entry): Order processing refers to the
time from when the seller receives an order until an appropriate location (i.e.
warehouse) is authorised to fill the order (Ballou, 2004). First, orders for
completeness and accuracy must be checked. Once the order enters into the
order processing system, various checks are made to determine if
a the customer’s credit is satisfactory to accept the order
b the desired product is available in inventory in the quantities ordered, and
the product is scheduled for production if not currently in inventory.
Order form data are utilised for sales records, such as credit status reports,
billing schedules, and manufacturing/purchasing schedules. These have to be
routed to all departments. The sequence must be so determined that the flow of
information is expedited and it is ensured that documentation takes place in all
relevant departments. Customers place orders with a customer service
representative. After checking credit status, preparing back order or order
cancelling documentation must be done (Ballou, 2004). If these activities are
performed manually, a great amount of time may be required, which can
slowdown (i.e., lengthen) the order cycle. Also customer in placing an order
would need an acknowledgement and expected date of delivery. This can be
traced by ‘status reporting’.
Step 3 Order filling (order picking and packing): Generally, this step includes dispatch
of goods, invoicing, shipping and, documentation). After checking credit, prices
and etc, the order must to be transmitted to warehouse for execution. The longer
is the delay in executing the order, the larger is the possibility that customer will
cancel\amend the order. Explicit dispatch instructions to be issued to warehouse
and customer should be informed about the status of the order (Lambert et al.,
1998).
After receipt of order, the warehouse manager have to order for transport,
simultaneously preparing the documents for dispatch for the purpose of
accountant of stocks, billing and advice to the customer, billing of transportation
and intimation to all concerned including marketing, production, finance,
purchase etc. to fulfil the requirements of an integrated system. An expeditious
order processing is required. Often represents the best opportunity to improve
the effectiveness and efficiency of an order cycle (Ballou, 2004).
Step 4 Order delivery (shipment): Order delivery is the time from when a carrier
picks up the shipment until it is received by the customer (Ballou, 2004).
As just-in-time delivery has become increasingly commonplace and
customer demands continue to tighten, the importance of fast, reliable delivery
performance cannot be overstated. This is particularly true for organisations
Process development in customer order information systems 215
where activities in one area generate activities in another area. The system provides
online, real-time information and one place for input of data. When a transaction is
executed in any module, ERP automatically updates data in all application modules that
are affected. Firms have recently faced the two fold challenges of the abrupt deterioration
of the global economy and continual rise in customer demands and expectations. ERP
benefits a firm in cost minimisation and service level enhancement (Chan et al., 2012).
Integrated information systems enable simplified business processes, standard data
definition, and a common business language. Simplified business processes enhance
productivity to allow focus on value-added activities. Integration eliminates need for
redundant analysis and reconciliation (Tarrant County, online).
ERP systems are designed to capture almost any business activity, and if the standard
functionality is not available, it allows you to create custom solutions to close the gap
between the pre-packaged application and the desired state. They cover most of the
standard business functions that are universal for most industries (Chudy and Castedo,
2010).
ERP solutions empower companies to automate many business processes formerly
done by hand. But to achieve a full return on investment in ERP solutions, businesses
need to automate the documents that drive business processes. Some companies have also
implemented technologies to automate document exchange, but often only to a limited
degree. Entering orders into ERP applications reduces the time it takes to turn an order
into money in the bank offers strategic benefits to the company while strengths customer
relationships. Beyond cost savings, companies converting to an automated order
processing system can realise efficiencies throughout the order-to-cash cycle (Esker,
online).
ERP systems include many modules. When only one business process takes into
consider such as ‘customer order management’, several modules will be required, as well.
We cannot think those systems simply in terms of independent modules. The ERP
application modules that support most of ‘customer order management’ processes are
sales and distribution, materials management, financial accounting, controlling and,
production planning (Peebles, 2010).
At the end of the Step 2, sales personnel now have the option to print the quotation and
send it to the customer by fax or mail or to have the system e-mail the quotation directly.
All the data associated with the quotation are now stored in the common database in the
enterprise system and are easily accessible to support subsequent steps in the process
(Magal and Word, 2010).
steps are using in business process) can be started. ‘Transfer orders’ are used to
initiate picking. The transfer order includes data copied from the delivery
document. The confirmation of the transfer order completes the picking
activities. Delivery packing list and bill of lading output are usually triggered at
the completion of these steps.
Step 6 Send shipment, ship: In this step ‘packing list’ is the main document that
utilised. The posting of goods completes the process and results in stock
movement or a confirmation of service that changes on-hand inventory balance,
reducing it and updating the balance sheet accounts in financial accounting
(Chudy and Castedo, 2010).
As outlined in the objectives, the purpose of this paper is to improve the ERP enabled
order processing technology to understand the role emphasised in the literature with
regard to a successful corporate performance. We also have developed a framework to
identify the critical points and to determine the solutions based on the case study. The
definition of problem and developed model in a case study is given below.
4.1 Problem definition: problems with case company’s pre-sales and sales
process
The entire sales process involves a series of steps that require coordination between sales,
warehouse, accounting, and receiving (Monk and Wagner, 2012). In this study we have
focused on pre-sales and sales stages, and aimed to identify the problems and solutions in
the case SME with information system support. A number of problems occur with this
process, including the following:
As a SME, case company has problems with receiving payments from his customers.
Because of customer’s financial problems and economic environment, the company
started to get problems in his cash flow. Sales personnel must confirm quotations or
orders that are over the acceptable credit risk level and be responsible. So a more serious
credit check system must be implemented. Figure 3 demonstrates the basic information
flow till creating a sales order.
The company requires to follow ‘planned-due date’ and the realised ‘receiving
payment date’ of the invoices. Plans to link the payment received performance with the
220 B. Kocaoglu and A.Z. Acar
related sales personnel. By using this strategy, sales personnel will not take into risk
himself and his company for the risky customers.
• T6: time from creating the customer invoice-to-receiving the customer payment
(other general metrics like shipping performance, lead time etc. are not included in
this study).
So a model is needed to solve these problems and serve as a map for implementation.
Company uses many ERP modules including sales, inventory and accounting.
Company implemented big bang approach but after a period of time use, some postponed
concepts needed to rethink again.
19 Rejected by customer: Sales personnel updates the status of the inquiry and specifies
the reason of rejection like ‘high price’, ‘late response’, ‘late delivery date’.
20 Customer PO: Customer transmits his order to the case company’s sales department.
21 Sales order: Sales personnel create the sales order easily, referenced by the related
quotation record.
22 Picking document.
23 Packing list.
24 Customer invoice.
25 Customer payment.
The required metrics (T1, T2,…) measurable by the information system are shown in the
process (Figure 4).
1. Customer inquiry
Y N
3. New
material?
N 4. Y
Feasible-2?
5. Declaration mail
N 8. New Y
T1 customer?
6. Create material
9. Create customer T3
6.1 Pricing 6.2 Lead time 9.1 Terms payment 9.2 Credit limit
T2
N Y
12. Cash?
Y T5
13. Exceed N
credit?
14. Rejected by N
company Y 15. Stock
available?
19. Rejected by Y
customer N 20. Customer PO
18. Customer
confirm?
21. Sales order
T6
23. Packing list 22. Picking document
25. Customer payment 24. Customer invoice
Process development in customer order information systems 225
Modern ERP systems are embedded by the promise of integration that standardises
operations and thereby enables their centralised management. They promise to solve the
most urgent management problems, to mould the organisation into the desired form, and,
as a result, achieve a high level of performance. All this will be achieved by adopting an
ERP system (Granlund, 2011; Teittinen et al., 2013).
Many of the company’s sales order processes have some sort of problems, such as
incorrect pricing, excessive calls to the customer for information, order-processing
delays, missed delivery dates, and so on. Information from each system is shared either
electronically through periodic file transfers (sales order system to accounting system) or
manually by paper printout (credit status from the accounting department to sales clerks).
The high number of manual transactions creates many opportunities for data entry errors.
Further, not all the information stored in the system is available in real time, resulting in
incorrect prices and credit information.
Order cycle (replenishment cycle or lead time) refers to the time from when a
customer places an order to when goods are received. Some organisations include
‘order-to-cash’ cycle in their order management model. In this study we have expanded
order cycle to ‘order-to-cash’ cycle. Accordingly, given the authors’ interest in this issue
and to address the lack of related literature, the research problem for this study is to
develop a new pre-sales order management strategy for SMEs that will strike an
appropriate balance between customer service and financial risks.
According to this prescience in current study we aimed to develop a more efficient
order management process for a SME also that can be generalised for the others. This
process development aims to strike an appropriate balance between measuring lost times
and managing customer credit limits.
copying it from related quotation), giving you a full trace of the sales activities from
establishing the contact with the customer to collecting the payment. This type of system
allows the customer service representative to determine if the ordered products are
available in inventory, and to deduct orders automatically from inventory so that items
are not promised to another customer. Quotations below the accepted credit risk level can
easily be denied. Furthermore, it became possible to calculate requested metrics. For
example T5 represents the time between processes (11–17) in Figure 4. This can easily be
calculated by the information system. This system can also integrate with ‘customer
relationship management’ (CRM) system. In addition to all of these, manual feasibility
checks, speed up the process.
ERP systems do not only enable end users to execute the regular transactional processes
efficiently in all functional areas, but also have the potential to be applied to facilitate
executives’ work in various ways: to manager sources effectively (Shih, 2006), support
rapid decision-making (Wu and Wang, 2007), and leverage competitive advantages (Shao
et al., 2012; Chou et al., 2014).
In this study, an attempt has been made to study order processing in order to manage
the system more efficiently. The purpose of the study is to explore the application of an
existing case process and develop a framework through empirical data collection and
analysis. The sales order processing in ERP systems seemed interesting at the beginning
of ERP implementation, but advanced developments occurring over the past decade, that
it is not entirely suited to the current EIS environment. There is a need to clearly integrate
customer order parameters and variables into any ERP framework. The results then
would provide a more appropriate process for enhancing supply chain competitiveness.
Though the empirical study helped identify more specific attributes of sales order
processing in ERP, a case study with detailed data collection based on the developed
framework would help to further develop a more precise framework not only for
developing process, but also for its implementation.
Due to complex, uncertain and asymmetric business conditions, the flow of
information among SC linkages is essential for competitiveness (Pujara and Kant, 2013).
This linkage starts from companies’ internal process. There is a need to examine a
company and determine what truly makes it better than the competition? Not in terms of
product or service offerings – but the internal focus of the organisation (Dubey and Ali,,
2013).
We think that the results are not specific to case company and we assume they could
apply to other companies, especially are SMEs. Additional studies may validate this
assumption. However, there are not many studies concerned with the internal sales order
process. At first the process seems simple, but small points can cause big troubles. By
using a case study method, we analysed the process and real life problems.
The mentioned improvements support customer services, these services are often
perceived as very convenient or novel by customers, and tend to improve the firm’s
competitive position. A firm can introduce more innovative service processes than
competitors by ensuring that customer needs and wants are satisfied and manifested in
the service operations routines particularly when service process innovation is coupled
Process development in customer order information systems 227
References
Ballou, R.H. (2004) Business Logistics/Supply Chain Management, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle
River.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K. and Mead, M. (1987) ‘The case research strategy in studies of
information systems’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.369–386.
Chan, X., Lau, Y-Y. and Ng, J.M.J. (2012) ‘Critical evaluation of ERP implementation on firm
performance: a case study of AT&T’, International Journal of Logistics Systems and
Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.52–69.
Charkha, P.G. and Jaju, S.B. (2014) ‘Designing innovative framework for supply chain
performance measurement in textile industry’, International Journal of Logistics Systems and
Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.216–230.
Chou, H-W., Chang, H-H., Lin, Y-H. and Chou, S-B. (2014) ‘Drivers and effects of
post-implementation learning on ERP usage’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 6,
pp.267–277.
Christopher, M. (2011) Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, China.
Chudy, M. and Castedo, L. (2010) Sales and Distribution in SAP ERP – Practical Guide, SAP
Press/Galileo Press, Boston, MA.
Coyle, J., Bardi, E. and Langley, J.C. (2003) The Management of Business Logistics: A Supply
Chain Perspective, South-Western, Quebec.
Dubey, R. and Ali, S.S. (2013) ‘An exploratory study on logistics competency and firm
performance’, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Vol. 14, No. 2,
pp.179–199.
Esker, Automated Sales Order Processing for Order-to-Cash Performance with ERP
Systems [online] http://www.esker.com/fm/others/017-Esker_DeliveryWare_WhitePaper_
SalesOrderProcessing_ERP-US.pdf (accessed May 2014).
Ghiani, G., Laporte, G. and Musmanno, R. (2004) Introduction to Logistics Systems Planning and
Control, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
Granlund, M. (2011) ‘Extending AIS research to management accounting and control issues:
a research note’, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 12,
pp.3–19.
Güleş, H.K., Öğüt, A. and Paksoy, T. (2005) ‘İşletmelerde tedarik zinciri yönetim sistemi
etkinliğinin artırılmasında kurumsal kaynak planlamasının rolü’ (‘The role of ERP on
enhancing the effectiveness of SCM system in companies’), Vol. 5, No. 9, pp.91–106, Selçuk
Üniversitesi, İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi.
Handfield, B.R. and Nicholas Jr., E.L. (2002) Supply Chain Redesign: Transforming Supply Chains
into Integrated Value Systems, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hong, P., Youn, S.H. and Nahm, A. (2008) ‘Supply chain partnerships and supply chain
integration: the mediating role of information quality and sharing’, International Journal of
Logistics Systems and Management, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.437–456.
Horvath, L. (2001) ‘Collaboration: the key to value creation in supply chain management’, Supply
Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp.205–207.
Hsu, P-F. (2013) ‘Commodity or competitive advantage? Analysis of the ERP value paradox’,
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp.412–424.
Khan, U. (2011) The Development of an Order Delivery Strategy for a Multinational Firm,
Unpublished MSc Thesis in Engineering Technology, Luleå University of Technology,
Sweden.
Kumar, K. and Hillegersberg, J.V. (2000) ‘ERP experiences and evolution’, Communications of the
ACM, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp.23–26.
Lai, I.K.W. (2008) ‘The information processing infrastructure for internet based collaboration’,
International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp.634–649.
Process development in customer order information systems 229
Lambert, D.M., Stock, J.R. and Ellram, L.M. (1998) Fundamentals of Logistics Management,
Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Burr Ridge, IL.
Lancioni, R.A. (2000) ‘New developments in supply chain management for the millennium –
determining supplier and buyer effection inventory performance’, Industrial Marketing
Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.1–6.
Magal, S.R. and Word, J. (2010) Essentials of Business Processes and Information Systems, Wiley
Publishing, USA.
Milgate, M. (2001) ‘Supply chain complexity and delivery performance: an international
exploratory study’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 6, No. 3,
pp.106–118.
Monczka, R.M. and Morgan, J. (1997) ‘What’s wrong with supply chain management?’,
Purchasing, Vol. 122, No. 1, pp.69–73.
Monk, E. and Wagner, B. (2012) Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning, 4th ed., Cengage
Learning Publications, USA.
Murphy, P.R. and Wood, D.F. (2004) Contemporary Logistics, Prentice Hall, USA.
Ng, J.K.C., Ip, W.H. and Lee, T.C. (1999) ‘A paradigm for ERP and BPR integration’,
International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp.2093–2108.
Parthasarathy, S. and Sharma, S. (2014) ‘Determining ERP customization choices using
nominal group technique and analytical hierarchy process’, Computers in Industry, Vol. 65,
No. 6, pp.1009–1017.
Peebles, D. (2010) Sales Order Process [online] http://www.yorku.ca/garys/SAPWorkshop/Sales
%20Order%20Process.ppt (accessed December 2013).
Pujara, A.A. and Kant, R. (2013) ‘Information sharing enablement of supply chain: a conceptual
framework’, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Vol. 14, No. 3,
pp.298–314.
Ragatz, G.L., Hanfield, R.B. and Scannell, T.V. (1997) ‘Success factors for integrating suppliers
into new product development’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 3,
pp.190–202.
Roth, R.A. (1989) ‘Preparing the reflective practitioner: transforming the apprentice through the
dialectic’, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp.31–35.
Runeson, P. and Höst, M. (2009) ‘Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in
software engineering’, Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.131–164.
Rushton, A., Croucher, P. and Baker, P. (2006) The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution
Management, Kogan Page Publishers, USA.
SAP, Delivery Performance to Customer – by Quantity [online] http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/
display/KPI/Delivery+Performance+to+Customer+-+by+Quantity (accessed May 2014).
Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books,
New York, NY.
Shao, Z., Feng, Y. and Liu, L. (2012) ‘The mediating effect of organizational culture and
knowledge sharing on transformational leadership and enterprise resource planning systems
success: an empirical study in China’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 6,
pp.2400–2413.
Shapiro, B.P., Rangan, V.K. and Sviokla, J.J. (1992) ‘Staple yourself to an order’, Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp.113–122.
Shih, Y.Y. (2006) ‘The effect of computer self-efficacy on enterprise resource planning usage’,
Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp.407–411.
Şimşek, M. (2000) Sorularla Toplam Kalite Yönetimi ve Kalite Güvence Sistemleri (TQM and
Quality Assurance Systems with Questions), Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım Ltd Şti., İstanbul.
Singh, R.K. and Acharya, P. (2014) ‘Supply chain management: everlasting and contemporary
research issues’, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Vol. 19, No. 1,
pp.1–19.
230 B. Kocaoglu and A.Z. Acar
Srinivas, T. (2002) ‘Enhancing supply decisions through the use of efficient marginal cost models’,
The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Fall, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp.4–10.
Tarrant County, Finance and Purchasing Overview [online] http://www.tarrantcounty.com/titan/
lib/titan/training/GN002.ppt (accessed December 2013).
Teittinen, H., Pellinen, J. and Marko Järvenpää, M. (2013) ‘ERP in action, challenges and benefits
for management control in SME context’, International Journal of Accounting Information
Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.278–296.
Verville, J. and Halingten, A. (2003) ‘An investigation of the decision process for selecting an ERP
software: the case of ESC’, Management Decision, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp.206–216.
Welingkar Institute of Management, Logistics Information Systems [online] http://www.slideshare.
net/WelingkarDLP/logistics-infosystem (accessed December 2013).
Wu, J.H. and Wang, Y.M. (2007) ‘Measuring ERP success: the key-users’ viewpoint of the
ERP to produce a viable IS in the organization’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23,
No. 3, pp.1582–1596.