Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE:
THE CASE OF HONGWEI
HOLDINGS BERHAD
Group Members:
NURUL AMIRA AZLIN BINTI SAZALI
INTAN SHAFIRA BINTI MD SAAD
NUR IZZATI BINTI NOZULAN
NURUL SAKINAH BINTI MOHD SHOKOR
NUR NAJWA BINTI MOHD HAWARI
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
• Hongwei is a Malaysian based company that engaged in
footwear productions, specializing in shoe soles was
established in 1993. It started as a family-run business till it
currently well known as a high-quality footwear brand.
• This business has their own target market which are middle-
age working adults where the soles can meet the demand of
these demographics.
• Hongwei has produced 4 types of shoes which are
• Thermoplastic rubber (TPR) shoe soles
• Rubber (RB) shoe soles
• MD1 shoe soles
• MD2 shoe soles.
• Hongwei keep doing great in the market despites of the slow
growth of the global footwear industry.
• However, Hongwei started to have problems when the company cannot provide
audited report to the Bursa, as the annual report was delayed in 2015. The
audit work cannot be done as the auditor cannot reach their subsidiaries to
confirm on few things which given the significant amount to the company. Due
to unresponsive subsidiaries, the auditor unable to complete the audit report.
There also can be risk that this happens due to fraud, where the auditor cannot
obtain disclosures from the managements. The auditor also informed that there
were legal claims on Jinjiang Shoe Material Ltd; the main subsidiaries, however
the claims were unsure due to incomplete information provided. Due to these
problems, it had cast the significant doubt about the group and the company’s
ability to continue as going concerns, and the auditor unable to determine
whether the use of going concern assumptions is appropriate.
• Due to worsen conditions of Hongwei, they decided to appoint the new
directors. The newly appointed board of directors had taken steps to comply
with the best practices of principles of good corporate governance as set out in
Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2012 and the main market listing
requirements of Bursa Malaysia Security Berhad.
PROBLEM
STATEMENTS
Employees send Unable to submit
resignation letters Rising price of raw the annual report
& resignation of materials lead to Bursa on-time
Share price keep
board members towards reducing due to delay of
dropping
without prior the growth of audit work done
notices footwear industry for the accounts
Incomplete audit
work due to Internal control Significant doubt
unresponsive was also problem about the group and
subsidiaries; unable Making loses for
that lead to the company’s
to contact the few years since
inability to obtain ability to continue
management of 2013, although the
sufficient as going concerns,
subsidiaries, group was making
assurance that and the auditor
ownership and profits, but the
recoverable amount there were no unable to determine
company itself was
of subsidiaries could material weakness whether the use of
going concern continuously
not be determined, in the systems of
assumptions is making loses
cannot provide internal accounting
proper evidence for controls appropriate.
inventory amounts.
QUESTION 1
Identify and explain the issues and
weaknesses in relation to corporate
governance of Hongwei Holdings Berhad.
1. Hongwei facing a big problem where the release
of its December 2015 annual report is delayed
Based on Company Act 2016 Section 259 : Hongwei facing a big problem where the
release of its December 2015 annual report is
• The Company Act 2016 decoupled the submission delayed because of additional work to be
of the financial statements from the annual return. done by the auditor as part of the process of
• Section 259 CA 2016 requires a company to lodge investigating and verifying the expenditure
its financial statements and reports (collectively incurred and the bank balance
called ‘the accounts’) with the Registrar of • Because of that board had agreed to notify
Company (ROC). Bursa Malaysia on the development and set a
• For a private company, it must be done within 30 new deadline of no later than two month
days from the day the accounts are circulated to from the year ended.
the members (s259 (1) (a)).
• But Hongwei still failed to meet the new
• The accounts must be circulated to the members deadline and was unable to submit the
within six months from the end of its financial year annual report.
(section 258).
• In the case of a public company, the accounts • Due to this Hongwei‘s share price has started
must be lodged with the ROC within 30 days from to drop tremendously in trading and their
its annual general meeting (‘AGM’). share price has been dropping each year.
2. Issues on arising around Hongwei
regarding its subsidiaries and inventories.
• In order to complete the delay audit report the auditor had to
meet up with the management teams of all the subsidiaries to
Based on Company Act 2016 Section 266 (power duties solve problems
of auditor ),subdivision (1) and subdivision (4) :
• The auditor was unable to contact the management of the
• (1)Every auditor of the company shall report to the
subsidiaries and there were no commitment given by the
members on the financial statement and on the management teams of subsidiaries.
company’s accounting and others records relating to
those financial statement if it is holding company for • Auditor not able to complete the audit report because they not
which consolidated financial statement are prepared determine whether all significant events occurring after the
shall also report to the members on the consolidated reporting period had been adequately dealt with the financial
financial statement. statement with respect to disclosures, presentation and
adjustment.
• (4) An auditor of a company has a right of access at
all reasonable times to the accounting and other • There were also risks that due to the fraud where the auditor
records, including registers of the company and is could not obtain disclosure from the management of the
entitled to require from any officer of the company subsidiaries regarding the result of their assessment of the risk
and any auditor of a related company such whether the financial statement may be misstated as a result of
information and explanations as he desires for the fraud.
purposes of audit. • The auditor was unable to obtain appropriate evidence from its
subsidiaries, Greenate investment and Evidoma Ltd. To ascertain
whether the group still had ownership over the inventories.
3. Issues led to the inability to obtain sufficient
assurance that there were no material weaknesses in
the system of internal account controls
Based on Company Act 2016 Section 246 (system of internal control ),subdivision (1) paragraph (b) :
• All the transaction are properly authorized and that the transaction are recorded as necessary to enable the
preparation of true and fair view of the financial statement of the company.
• Auditor also informed that there were legal claims that appeared to have been brought by certain parties against
Jinjiang shoes material Ltd.
• Auditor has not completed their investigation due to some limitation and was currently unable to provide the
required information and comprehensive legal advice and auditor were unable to assess the completeness of the
legal cases extending liabilities, including contingent liabilities that might arises.
• Gary Menon was charged RM 1,600,000 and Jasmine was fined RM 1,600,000 for causing Hongwei commit financial
reporting breaches and permitting the conglomerate to commit corporate governance breaches ,foreign listing
requirement breaches, disclosure breaches and non –compliance with Bursa Malaysia Securities’ Directives.
• Due from that, two out of five board members resign last month due to personal reason without any prior notice.
• On top of that Gary Menon and Jasmine Kaur had failed of refused to communicate with either the regulator or the
new board in Malaysia and following the Bursa‘s enforcement action fines of RM 1,600,000 each had been
imposed to them.
• The issues raised indicated that the existence of the material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the
group’s and company’s ability to continue as going concern
• Due to the auditors’ inability to contact the management of the subsidiaries, they were unable to determine
whether the use of the going concern assumption is appropriate.
4. These problems because of the lack of experience of the ceo
that does not know the importance of corporate governance
Section 213 (1), (2) and (3) of Companies Act 2016 – Duties and responsibilities of
directors
• (1) A director of a company shall at all times exercise his powers in accordance with
this Act, for a proper purpose and in good faith in the best interest of the company.
• (2) A director of a company shall exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence with –
(a) the knowledge, skill and experience which may reasonably be expected of a
director having the same responsibilities; and
(b) Any additional knowledge, skill and experience which the director in fact has.
• (3) A director who contravenes this section commits an offence and shall, on conviction,
be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to a fine not exceeding
three million ringgit or both.
5. The CEO also does not know how to make a
trust upon their shareholder and stakeholders.