Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
POST GRADUATE PROGRAM
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
PROJECT WORK
Dear Learners, here under you are given a project work to help you understand the practical application of
group behavior in organizational context. Due to the nature of the topic the project is an individual work.
The date of submission is August, 15, 2021. The maximum mark of the project is 20%. If you have
questions and need consultation contact me any time anywhere.
Instructions of the Project:
1. Select one local business organization (manufacturing and/or service) preferably an organization in
which you’re currently working in. If you are not employed anywhere, select an organization in
which you can get at least three employees who are willing to give you information regarding their
behavior at work setting.
2. The organization you select should have a minimum of 20 employees with a formal organizational
structure and governing system.
3. Write an introduction and/or background about your case company and its overall operations.
4. List and explain your personal values (espoused and enacted) and your case company values; and
critically, evaluate value congruence including: espoused verses enacted values of yours, personal
values verses organizational values.
5. Describe the practices of your case company regarding team/group, and which type of team is
commonly formed?
6. Scientifically evaluate the effectiveness of team works in your case company?
7. Do you think that the Teams in your case company are SDWTs; If not what are the major practical
challenges SDWTs you observed?
8. Have you made decisions in team; if so evaluate the effectiveness of the decision made in terms of
results obtained and/or risks experienced.
9. What are the major activities performed to build team in the case company?
10. Have you ever faced conflict while working in team/group and as an individual (the experience of
one or two group members can be presented); if so what are the actual sources of conflict and what
was the outcome?
Post Graduate Program Page 1
Having a written (espoused values) value is essential but also having enacted value is very important. For an
organization that wants to build a good reputation with customers and fellow business organizations, good and
healthy relationships can only be built by enacted values, not written words (espoused values). Although both
are important, and espoused values can to turned into enacted values.
Espoused values can also be said to be publicly stated values and standards of an organization which can be
found in mission statements, Objectives, Goals, Vision Statements, etc. Espoused values are often regarded
as the aspirations of a company. They directly influence how a company operates and how the employees
function. It is one of the main factors that drive an organization’s culture together with Artifacts and basic
Unlike espoused values written in mission statements, goals, objectives, vision statements, etc., enacted
values are seen in the behaviors of the people in the organization. Note that both espoused values and
enacted values are essential to an organization. As individuals, we have met people who tell what their values
are, but they act otherwise.
It could have happened to us too, telling people what our values are, but, in the end, when we have
the opportunity to show it, we don’t act accordingly. It does not mean that we are lying when we say what our
espoused values are and don’t act like them. It simply means that we haven’t found a way to turn our
espoused values into enacted values (i.e., doing precisely what we say our values are).
Having a written (espoused values) value is essential but also having enacted value is very important. For an
organization that wants to build a good reputation with customers and fellow business organizations, good and
healthy relationships can only be built by enacted values, not written words (espoused values). Although both
are important, and espoused values can to turned into enacted values.
\ While choosing the right values for company, the person should be aware of why "those" values
and what is their use. They should do three things: satisfy the needs of the entrepreneurs (or
employees), meet the needs of all employers (the company) and also satisfy other stakeholders (for
example purchasers/clients, investors, local communities in which the company operates and also the
society as whole. However, espoused values cannot differ from the "mission" of the company, they
should be clearly connected with the unique character or the function of the organization (Barrett R.
2014, s. 156).
The first of the mentioned types of values is something that everyone considers extremely important
for the functioning of the organization. For example, in a chemical factory, employee safety and
environmental protection should be considered as fundamental values. Against that, the operational
value is the value that allows the efficient functioning of the organization. For instance, values such
as teamwork and trust should be treated as operational values - they affect all workers at the
company. The actual combination of core values and operational values will depend on the unique
function or unique nature of the organization (Barrett R. 2014, s. 156).
Post Graduate Program Page 4
Whatever your organisation’s espoused values, it is basic underlying assumptions that
guide behaviour. When the two are misaligned, behaviours betray actual organisational
culture – and this could be bad news for your organisation as it ceases to be what it says
it is. Here are three examples of such misalignment
1. Let’s say that one of your espoused values is ‘to act with integrity and honesty at
all times’. This declared value should drive how your employees behave toward
customers and each other. But underneath this, if your organisation’s internal philosophy
is to bury mistakes so they don’t leak out to the wider market, then there is an immediate
clash between your espoused values and your basic underlying assumptions. What you
say does not match what you do.
2. You may have the worthy value of the ‘customer being first’ in everything your
organisation and its employees do. However, if commissions and bonuses are based
entirely upon profits, then it is sales that drives behaviour – potentially leading to poor
advice to customers.
3. Another common value is ‘treating others with respect’. Yet behind closed doors, if
your managers operate in an authoritarian and intimidating manner, this is likely to
undermine any sense of respect that may exist.
If there is any disagreement between what the organization states as its values, and in how the
organization demonstrates its values, successful individuals will go with the values the
organization demonstrates.16 As stated earlier, individuals will often go to great lengths to
rationalize their self-interest-oriented (and derived value) behavior in stated organizational
value terms to avoid this disagreement. In some cases, this disagreement often requires
management to consciously exhibit a type of organizational hypocrisy, or publicly stating
support for the stated values of the organization while acting in accordance with the contrary
demonstrated values of the organization. It also appears from reviewing the literature that truth
is an early casualty to this disagreement. That is to say, the wider the "values gulf" is
perceived, the more difficult for "bad news" to make its way through the organization and to
rise to the top management.
It is ludicrous to think that these value disagreements or dilemmas are lost on the
organization's members, even when they have "successfully" rationalized their behavior in
derived value terms. Any significant separation between the stated and actual values of an
organization causes cynicism among the organization's members in direct proportion to the
size of the separation17. Individuals that fail to adapt to the actual (not the stated) values of the
organization will not succeed in the organization. 18 Therefore, failure to act in accordance with
the actual (not stated) values of the organization is a type of professional suicide. It also
follows that those who quickly adapt to the actual values of the organization have a decided
advantage over those who do not. Substantial disconnects between the stated and
demonstrated values of an organization will have the greatest averse impact on the more
Post Graduate Program Page 6
idealistic members of the organization, because they are likely to hold onto the stated values
longer. This likely puts them at a significant disadvantage in terms of promotions, selections,
and assignments.
humans act rationally and rely on reason to perceive reality effectively. This "Objectivist"
view is basic to this paper's hypotheses and means that organization members will
individually evaluate reality and act accordingly. To state another way, it means that values
are objectively evaluated based on the direct experience of the members. The creation of
culture and the socialization of the organization's members rely heavily on learning processes
to ensure an institutionalized reality.9 In many cases this is trial and error learning.10 This
learning may take place in planned or informal, often unintended ways. 11 The reward system
of the organization (promotion, training selection, benefits, prestige, etc.) highlights what
values are truly organizationally important. Individuals will then execute behaviors that
further their long term professional survival and well being. 12 This strongly implies that if
there is a difference between what an organization declares as its values and the values
demonstrated by its policies, the rational members would put priority on the values
determined from the policies.13 The synthesis of above is the following concept: The greater
the impact of the organization's rules and policies on an individual, the more the values of
that organization are taught and reinforced in the individual's mind.
Organizational values set acceptable or expected norms or bounds of behavior for the
individual members of the organization. Without organizational values, organization members
will, by default, follow their individual value systems. These may or may not promote
behavior that the organization finds desirable. Therefore, organizations establish values to
provide their members guidelines for their behavior. Organizational values also provide the
framework for the culture of the organization. Culture is the body of custom, ideas,
assumptions, and institutional patterns transmitted from one generation to the next and are
particularly powerful in determining individual behavior. 2 It is "the collective programming of
the mind."3 Any values that has the net result of potentially changing culture must be analyzed
very carefully because it is very difficult to reverse those changes.
Obviously, the values of the organization should support the mission of the organization. It
would make little sense for an organization to espouse values that work against its long-range
goals.4 To summarize, the values of the organization should provide a guide or framework for
the organizations members in accomplishing their part of the organization's mission.
Your values are what you think is important and meaningful and guide how you behave. They’re
the principles and standards that guide your behaviour. They’re the standard you hold yourself
to even when nobody is watching.
Your espoused values are the values you say are important to you. They’re the stakes you put in
the ground to tell others how you want to act. They may be aspirational, or you may already be
living them.
When there’s a gap between espoused and enacted values, you’re in trouble. It means you’re
not walking your talk as a company, and that leads to all sorts of undesirable effects.
For one, it’s one of the biggest causes for employee dissatisfaction. It’s hard to feel good about
where you work when you regularly see people doing something else than what they say is
crucial.
For another, it’s responsible for lack of company success, as your objectives and goals are in
line with your espoused values, but your actions and results are in line with your enacted values.
People aren’t that resistant to change. They’re resistant to a lack of clarity or secrecy and the
uncertainty that comes from that. What gets called resistance to change is merely the effect of
shared basic assumptions eating espoused values and desired organisational changes for
breakfast.
The secret to releasing the brakes on change is recognising shared basic assumptions, shared
values, for the force they are, and dealing with them accordingly.
Work teams are continuing units responsible for producing goods or providing services. Their
membership is typically stable, usually full time and well-defined. Work teams are found in both
manufacturing and service settings and are traditionally directed by supervisors who make most
of the decisions about what is done, how it is done and who does it. Self-managing teams
involving employees making decisions that were formerly made by supervisors are gaining favor.
Functional Teams
Work on the new product starts with the idea from the marketing
department;
The idea is passed down to research and development to
determine its feasibility;
After R&D, the design department is tasked with giving it an
appealing look and feel;
And finally, the product is made by the
manufacturing department.
Advantages:
Some of these factors may seem intuitive. Because such issues are rarely clear-cut, we need to
examine the issue of group effectiveness from another perspective—one that considers the
effects of factors that aren’t quite so straightforward.
Determining the characteristics that make up effective teams is not enough. Leaders
also need to learn how they can go about building these traits into their teams. When
forming a team, these are some of the steps that one should follow:
Making the goals clear is crucial to the success of any project. It means that every
leader should start by providing comprehensive explanations of how each team
member’s actions help in achieving the main goals. Apart from making the goals
known, leaders also need to establish the specific activities that members should
prioritize. This way, every member knows exactly when and where his help is required.
With clear goals, it is also easier for members to see how their personal career
goals align with a project’s goals. Without this clarity, many employees may focus on
achieving their own goals at the expense of the team. The good thing is that if there
are open channels of communication, employees can always inquire how their
personal goals are related to those of the organization.
When it comes to selecting team members, there are three key aspects that one
ought to consider – individualism, multidimensionality, and the level of the team’s
skills.
It is a well-known fact that some individuals will always make better team
members than others. It’s also widely known that, with determination,
Post Graduate Program Page
12
individuals can learn how to function as one unit. An individualist is one who
likes putting his or her interests before those of his team members. Such people
excel in independent roles where they’re required to work individually.
However, there are also collectivists. They are individuals who like collaboration
and thrive better when they are part of a group. Although a collectivist makes a
better team member, in some situations it is the independent tasks that help
the whole group to succeed. However, a leader may have to apply more effort
when dealing with individualists.
Team diversity is more than just a combination of skills. It also refers to how
people from different cultures, genders, and races work together to achieve
goals. Diversity may be essential, as it enables team members to view goals
from different perspectives and come up with the best way of achieving them.