You are on page 1of 33

Venture Capital Initiative, Stanford Graduate School of Business

Corporate Venture Capital:


Learnings from
74 In-Depth Interviews

Ilya A. Strebulaev Amanda Wang


Graduate School of Business, Graduate School of Business,
Stanford University, and Stanford University
National Bureau of Economic Research

October 2021 1
1 Introduction
2
Introduction
Corporate venture capital (CVC) has been steadily rising on
the global investing stage. However, little is truly known
about how CVC units operate. The diversity of these units
makes traditional survey methods less effective at
capturing patterns and differences.

We interviewed senior CVC professionals of S&P500


companies and identified 94 CVC units*. Of these 94, we
captured 74 firms, or 78% of all active CVC units in the
S&P500. The average interview lasted 42 minutes and
78%
covered 45 questions. We sincerely thank all participants of active S&P500 CVC
for their time and insights. units interviewed

*Full list of the CVC units in S&P500 can be found in the Appendix

CVC units are incredibly different from one another. 3


Interview Method and Protocol

Interview Protocol Post-Interview Coding Protocol

Video interviews Careful coding with numerical, dummy,


Closely followed pre-determined protocol Likert-type scale variables, and raw text-
Flexibility to consider cross-sectional entry
variability in responses for a detailed Three independent coders, two of whom were
understanding of the internal operations not present during interviews, with
A response rate of 78% is significantly higher independent reconciliation. Pair-wise
than that of traditional surveys, meaning less agreement among coders is 97%
sensitivity to self-selection bias in our results
4
40%
CVC Parent Industry Comparison:
S&P500 Sample CVC Parent vs. S&P500
30% 31 31
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATIONS FROM THE GLOBAL
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, 2021
25

20%
20
19 19
16
14 Similar to surveys of institutional
13
10% 12
venture capital (IVC), information
technology (IT) comprises the largest
0%
sector of the CVC interview
participants' parents.
e

er
re

gy
s
tie
nc

um
ca

lo
na

ili

no
lth

ns

ut
Fi

ch
ea

Co

y,

te
H

rg

n
ne

io
,e

at
ls

rm
ria

fo
st

In
du
In

Companies in the IT, Finance, and Healthcare sectors are more likely to start CVC units. 5
CVC Geography
30%
50% 27
43 24
40%
22
20%

30%
15

22 10%
20% 7
16
14 5
10%
5 0%

l
st
a

na
es

es
ni

ut

ea
0%

or

io
W

So

th

at
id
lif

A
California Non-CA West Midwest South Northeast

or
M

rn
Ca

-C

te
on

In
N
CVC Unit Headquarters S&P500 Parent Headquarters

CVC units are disproportionately located in California. 6


CVC Geography
Location Relative to Parent Company

72% of CVCs are headquartered in the same state as their


parent HQs

66% of CVCs are within one mile of their parent HQs

26% of CVCs are more than 600 miles away from their
parent HQs

Is it more efficient for CVCs to be closer or farther away


7
from their parent companies?
2 CVC Objectives
8
Strategic vs. Financial
When we were founded, measures of success were one hundred
50% percentstrategic. In fact, to enforce this point, my CFO said I don’t
50
even want you to financially track these investments – I’ll write
every investment off as an R&D expense the day you close the
40% transaction."
- Midwest CVC

30% Ninety-plus percent of the time, it’s the same set of companies
that drive massive change in industry and also derive the financial
gain. You can almost think of the financial performance as a signal
20% 22 of whether it’s strategic or not."
- Finance CVC
16
10% We’re highly focused on the strategic side of the spectrum. We
11 want them to have a positive return and we do measure the IRR but
1 the corporate venture activity that we pursue is really intended to
0% further our parent's strategic priorities."

- IT CVC
c

c
al
l
ia

gi

gi
ci
nc

Do these strategic goals conflict with


te

te
ed
an

ra
na

ra
nc
fin

St

St
Fi

la
tly

tly
ly

financial performance?
ly
Ba
re

re
os

os
Pu

Pu
M

Most CVCs have strategic mandates from their parents. 9


Objectives Horizon

Short term 75

This is where CVC is so funny to me because


to really do true innovation, you have to have
a super long-term horizon, but in reality, we Short to medium term 3
have a super short-term horizon. The long
term is sacrificed for those short-term
needs." Medium-term 7
- Consumer CVC

Medium to long term 5

Do parents shoot themselves in


Long term 10
the foot with short-termism?
0% 25% 50% 75%

Short-term, often quarterly, evaluations of the CVC units are in stark contrast to the 10-
10
year horizons of IVCs.
Where do CVCs invest?
We asked interviewees how they allocated funds among three
buckets:
the core of what their parent currently does
adjacent markets to the parent's current operations
new and exploratory domains

The most consistent investment bucket is in the adjacent


markets. A third of the sample does not invest in the core,
perhaps for fear of interfering with internal R&D efforts.
Furthermore, 20% do not invest in new domains, countering
the traditional venture capital (VC) investing strategy.

Is investing in a parent's adjacent space efficient? Is it driven by short-term horizons? 11


O

0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
nl
y
in
co
re
Fo
cu
s
in
co
re
Ba

25
la
nc
ed
in
co
re

Core
Sp

23
or
ad
ic
in
co
re
N

20
ev
er
in
co
re
32

0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%

nl
y
in
ad
j.
3
Fo
cu
s
in
ad
Ba j.
49

la
nc
ed
in
Where do CVCs invest?

ad
Sp j.
41

or
ad
Adjacent
ic
in
ad
4

N j.
ev
er
in
ad
j.
3

O
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%

nl
y
in
ne
w
3

Fo
cu
s
in
ne
w
9

Ba
la
nc
ed
in
ne
w
36

Sp
or
ad
ic
in
ne
w
New Domains
32

N
ev
er
in
ne
w
20

12
Limited Partner (LP) Positions
50%

40% 43
In total, 43% of CVCs will not consider
taking LP positions. 30%

20% 24
For those who do, the rationale is: 19
Exposure to broader geographies 10% 13
Exposure to novel industries 1
0%

er
se
rit

in

ne

id
ek
io

ca

ns
o
pr

se

;n

co
c
ifi
p

cy
y
To

't
ec
el

ga

on
iv

sp

W
le
ct

in
A

y
nl
er

O
id
ns
Co
Most CVCs do not see the value in broadening their exposure by investing in IVCs. 13
3 CVC Fund Structure and
Relation to Parent
14
Stand-alone fund structure: 5 CVCs, or 7%
CVC is a separate legal entity managing an external investment fund for its parent
company, similar to a traditional general partner-limited partner relationship.

Multi-year commitment from the parent: 26 CVCs, or 35%


The parent has earmarked, announced, or allocated a specific multi-year fund
arrangement to its CVC unit.
Investing directly
off the parent's
balance sheet
Single-year commitment from the parent: 16 CVCs, or 22%
The CVC unit and its budget are reevaluated annually by the parent company.

Opportunistic: 27 CVCs, or 36%


CVC units without an approved budget who must seek budget allocation for each
investment they wish to make, on an ad hoc basis.

Most CVC units lack full-scale, long-term commitment from their corporate sponsors. 15
To whom in the parent CVC units report
Reporting Structure
Chief Strategy Officer 29
We all report to the person who started the group who
has since moved on to be head of [different
CEO 15
department]. The only reason we report to [this person]
is because s/he is the one who started the group, but
Head of CorpDev 13
then a year after, she got promoted to head a bigger
division."
CFO 12 - CA CVC

Head of BusDev 10 I can’t overstate how important it is at the end of the


day to have the right internal support for the activities
Head of Innovation 10 because it’s those stakeholders that are the gating
item if you deliver strategic value or not. You could
COO 5 have the best idea of strategic value but if that
stakeholder isn’t comfortable or dubious about your
Other 6 intentions or just doesn’t like you, they’ll find every way
0% 10% 20% 30%
to block that sort of success."
- Industrials CVC

In many cases, CVC units have not found a natural home within their parent. 16
Two-Stage Deal Approval Process
Step 1: Internal CVC Team Step 2: Investment Committee (IC)
93% of CVCs have an investment committee
The internal investing teams must agree on
comprised of parent company executives.
what to bring forth to their investment
82% of CVCs consider it a real authority, rather
committee.
than a rubber-stamp vote.

Unanimous 29 Unanimous 49
Consensus 21
Majority 19
Consensus 10

Head of Ventures 19 Majority 25


Lead Partner 8
Executive Sponsor 4 Other 16
0% 10% 20% 30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Internal Voting Rules IC Voting Rules


17
Who's on the IC?
CFO 54
CEO 38 The average IC has
CVC Rep. 34
four members.
Business Unit 26
Head of Legal 16
Head of Strategy 12
R&D Exec. 12 27%
CTO 11 of CVCs feel one vote on the IC is the
pivotal decision maker, rather than a
Head of CorpDev 9
true consensus or vote.
COO 7
President 5
0% 20% 40% 60%

In most CVCs, parent-controlled investment committees must approve of every deal. 18


Does your parent understand venture norms?
I think they understand better now than they
No, they don’t understand follow-on did four years ago when we were trying to

61%
investments, not having a ROFR, why you explain what venture investing is. Now,
wouldn’t put handcuffs on a startup if whether they understand it well enough to
we’re helping them... to be honest, they weigh in on investment decisions or things like
don’t really care." that, I have my doubts. But they seem to
- CA CVC understand venture investing and even the of senior
why behind doing it a little better now than
four years ago."
executives feel
Yes. I don’t know that this is the case in
- Southern CVC that their parents
another industry, but our senior execs are do NOT
regularly exposed – 50% of the pipeline is Maybe they understand, but quite
through M&A if not more than that. So they honestly, if something came to us understand the
have a very active evaluation activity which completely fresh with a 6-week deadline,
fills that pipeline. And then venture funds unless it was so obvious I could get all norms of the
make it their business to wear their sale- hands on deck support, I wouldn’t ruin our
reputation by pretending we could do it. I’d
venture space.
side hats any time they meet with a
potential buyer, so there’s a whole rhythm say this is for someone else."
to this that is well-established." - Industrials CVC
- Healthcare CVC

Is it optimal for parent company executives to approve and veto deals? 19


Business unit requirement to go ahead with a deal
Business Unit Sponsorship
Required and fully responsible ex-post 15

Required 29 Business units consistently play a


large role in the decision-making
and deal process for CVC units.
Involved in diligence/approval 28

Only 14% of the CVCs act


Involved in relevant deals 14 independently of their parent
company's business units.
Not involved 14

0 10 20 30

CVC units are better positioned to help their parent companies in core and
20
potentially adjacent but not truly disruptive domains.
4 Human Capital and
Compensation
21
CVC Team
12% of the CVCs do not have anyone
Composition 3
working full-time on ventures.

The average CVC team has nine 4 CVC units have 10 portfolio
1
people, including six investment companies per each senior
team members. investment team member.

2 40% of CVC investment 5 34% of the CVCs have a business


professionals had previously development team member
worked in a non-venture role at dedicated to aiding their portfolio
their parent company. companies post-investment.
22
Human Capital: CVC vs. IVC Practitioners
Comparison between 306 CVC professionals and 336 matched partners at IVC firms

CVC IVC

15% have past CVC experience 3% have CVC experience


29% have IVC experience 40% have past IVC experience
15% have entrepreneurial experience 28% have entrepreneurial experience
61% have an MBA degree 47% have an MBA degree
17% have a non-MBA graduate degree 12% have a non-MBA graduate degree
The average practitioner has spent six The average practitioner has spent eight
years at his or her CVC unit years at his or her firm

CVC and IVC human capital are very different. 23


Human Capital: CVC vs. IVC Firms
Comparison between 74 interviewed CVC units and 74 randomly matched IVCs

CVC IVC

Average CVC unit has six full board seats Average IVC has 14 full board seats
46% of CVCs have at least one team member 11% of IVCs have at least one team member with
with past CVC experience CVC experience
54% of CVCs have at least one team member 80% of IVCs have at least one team member with
with IVC experience past IVC experience
40% of CVCs have at least one team member 64% of IVCs have at least one team member with
with entrepreneurial experience entrepreneurial experience
45% of CVCs have at least one team member 63% of IVCs have at least one team member with a
with a top undergraduate degree top undergraduate degree
24
Compensation Do CVCs struggle with retention,
Only 15% of the CVCs have a carried interest especially those with a successful record?
profit-sharing arrangement. The other 85%
receive a standard corporate salary and bonus.
Only 31% of the CVCs fund performance For leaders of CVC units, this is the biggest
influences bonuses. challenge: trying to convince the organization you
need to have some kind of shadow carry or
something else to attract talent. If there’s
Performance influence on bonus 31 something that’s really kept me up from a
business operation standpoint, I don’t have the
tools today to retain my talent.”
- Finance CVC

I think fundamentally to attract quality talent, you


Synthetic carried interest 15 need to have that independence and rigor, not just
glorified business development function. I don’t
think we’re going to get there, but in terms of
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
compensation and carry-like structures, to attract
the best people, you need to have this strong VC
Do CVCs have the right incentives to thinking."
invest in bold, high-growth companies? - CA CVC 25
5 Relationships with
Startups
26
Commercial Agreements
For 32% of the CVCs, commercial agreements between startups and parents are
important, and 30% actively sign them after the deal.

Required for deal 4 100% 9

Expected 27 70+% 21

Actively seeking 32 30-70% 21

Secondary consideration 30 Up to 30% 8

No requirement 7 None 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 0 5 10 15 20 25

Required Pre-Investment Signed Post-Investment


27
Board Representation Preferences
40% 38 50%
46 The most important is getting
board visibility because we are
40%
30% strategic – we want to learn and
24 31 know what is going on. Initially,
30%
19 the board observer was very
20%
15 important because being a big
20%
16 public company, we thought let’s
10% take that seat. But then we
4
10%
6 realized that as a board
1 observer, you still don’t get
0% 0%
control. Of late, we started

ce
st

ke
ce
st

ke

ve

en
ve

ta
en

ta

ke
t
ke

in
t

en
forcing on having an actual

er
in

en
er

o
o

ta
tt
to
ta

ef
tt

er
to

ef

er

't
no
pr

ff
't
no

d
pr

ff
d

on
ire
on
ire

di
di

ng
board seat. That’s more

er
ng

er

W
In
W
In

qu
qu

ef
ro
ef
ro

Re

Pr
Re

St
Pr
St

important."
Full Board Seat Board Observer - CA CVC

CVC units differ greatly concerning board memberships: some strongly prefer full voting
28
representation while others are even indifferent to board observer positions.
Only lead 2 Deal Terms
Prefer to lead 8
92% of CVCs always require pro-rata rights.

Indifferent 33

12% of CVCs require a Right of First Refusal


Prefer to follow 42 ("ROFR").

15
Only follow
50% of CVCs require a Right of First Notice
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% ("ROFN").

Lead or Follow Preference


55% of CVCs require other, non-standard
Does the desire of many CVCs to get preferential deal terms.
terms make them lose more competitive deals? 29
The percentage of portfolio companies eventually
acquired by the parent company Acquisitions
50% 48

40% 39
78% of CVCs never have or do not
30% intend to have their parent company
acquire any portfolio company.
20%

12
10% 8
2
0%
Over 40% 20-40% 10-20% Up to 10% None

Attitudes toward buying portfolio companies contradicts an existing CVC reputation


30
among entrepreneurs.
6 Impact of COVID-19
31
COVID-19 Impact Positive 8
CVC units report resilience to COVID
macro shocks.
Neutral-to-positive 35
I hate to say this but for us, COVID has been
quite positive. Our business has soared during
COVID. Trends we're looking at are only Neutral 44
accelerating.”
- East Coast CVC
Neutral-to-negative 13
COVID has made it easier in terms of sourcing
deal opportunities. It's expanded our geographic
reach, which has been really helpful."
Negative
- Finance CVC

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%


All positive changes for our investments. Better
deals, higher valuations -- it hasn’t hurt in any
way." CVC units report resilience similar to that
- CA CVC reported by IVCs. 32
Concluding Observations

Before we commenced our interviews, we knew CVCs


were different from one another. But we were still
surprised by the diversity and differences we discovered.
Many CVC policies are inconsistent with the principles the
most successful VCs have practiced.

33

You might also like