Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Function
View Article Online
PAPER View Journal
Quercetin has been widely found to exhibit anticancer activity with low toxicity and prevalence in foods.
Quercetin has been reported to inhibit digestive system cancers including pancreatic cancer (PAAD) and
colon cancer (COAD), but rectal cancer (READ) has not been reported. The reported mechanisms and
targets are divergent. In this study, new targets and mechanisms were predicted for the influence of quer-
cetin on PAAD, COAD, and READ using bioinformatics methods. The results showed that quercetin may
target CD36 and reduce the death rate caused by PAAD by enhancing the cell adhesion, mediating the
uptake of fatty acids (FAs), regulating thrombospondin-1, and stimulating the immune response.
Quercetin may lower the death rate from READ by targeting SLCO1B1 and producing enhanced effects
from use of this compound, inhibiting cell growth, and inducing apoptosis in tumor cells. ACADS,
ALDH3B2, UGT2A3, AMH, CDKN2A, FOSL1, CD36, CFL2, CYP3A4, and MAF were identified as targets for
quercetin to reduce the death rate caused by COAD. Glutathione metabolism was mainly involved in the
effect of quercetin on COAD, including the enhancement of the oxidation of fatty acids, the metabolism
Received 3rd June 2019, of anticancer medications, and the stiffness of cells, and the reduction of chemical carcinogenesis, the
Accepted 24th July 2019
level of anti-Müllerian hormone, the proliferation of cancer cells and transcriptional misregulation, and
DOI: 10.1039/c9fo01168d mediation of the activity of glutathione transferases. The combined analyses of three databases can be
rsc.li/food-function referred to and used to seek medications and targets that can be applied to other diseases.
have also been found to produce quercetin and methyl- Function enrichment analysis
quercetin, expanding the availability of these bioactive com- The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated
pounds in nature.8 Quercetin is widely recognized for its high Discovery (DAVID) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) was used to
antioxidant, anti-antiallergic, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral perform function enrichment analysis on genes. It provides a
activities. Recently, the activities of quercetin have been comprehensive set of functional annotation tools to under-
explored in anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on stand the biological meaning behind a large list of genes.
cancer cells of the breast, lung, prostate, bladder, bone, brain, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (https://www.cancer.gov/)
blood, head and neck, cervix, skin, eye, thyroid gland, ovary, was used to obtain the mRNA expression data and clinical data
kidney, and mesothelium,9–12 as well as digestive system
Published on 26 July 2019. Downloaded by Nottingham Trent University on 8/9/2019 10:56:12 AM.
Fig. 2 Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in COAD (a), PAAD (b), and READ (c). The red dots represent all the up-regulated
genes, the black dots represent the normal genes, and the green dots represent all the down-regulated genes.
Fig. 3 Intersection situation of IPQ and DEGs. IPQ refers to the proteins
PPI network of shared genes in three cancers
interacting with quercetin. We established the network of shared genes in three cancers.
Fig. 5 shows the nodes and edges in the network in different
cancers. In COAD, the PPI network had 45 nodes and 147
serves as a receptor for thrombospondin in platelets and edges with an average aggregation coefficient of 6.53, and
various cell lines. IPQ shares 69 genes with READ, 45 genes enrichment p < 0.001 (Fig. 5a). In PAAD, the PPI network had 6
with COAD, and 8 genes with PAAD. nodes and 5 edges with an average aggregation coefficient of
1.25 and enrichment p = 0.0162 (Fig. 5b). In READ, the PPI
Function enrichment network had 69 nodes and 376 edges with an average aggrega-
KEGG function enrichment was performed on all of the tion coefficient of 10.9 and enrichment p < 0.001 (Fig. 5c).
shared genes. According to the results (FDR < 0.01), the genes
were annotated in two pathways of cytochrome Kaplan–Meier survival estimate
P450 metabolism with a total of 51 counts, including 26 in the To find the targets of quercetin in clinical samples, we first
chemical carcinogenesis pathway (hsa05204), 20 in retinol divided the reported cancer samples into a high expression
metabolism (hsa00830), 15 in steroid hormone biosynthesis group and a low expression group according to the mid-value
(hsa00140.), 12 in drug metabolism-other enzymes (hsa00983), of the significantly expressed genes. We performed Kaplan–
10 in ascorbate and aldarate metabolism (hsa00053), 10 in Meier survival estimation of all shared genes for each cancer
pentose and glucuronate interconversions (hsa00040), and 10 and identified the molecules related to prognosis. Screening at
in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism (hsa00860) the level of p ≤ 0.05, 1 gene (CD36, p = 0.02354) was identified
(Table 2). for PAAD, 1 gene for READ (SLCO1B1, p = 0.00905), and
hsa00980: metabolism of 26 CYP3A4, CYP2B6, ADH6, ADH1B, GSTM5, UGT1A6, UGT1A8, ADH4, UGT1A4, 3.97 × 10−28
xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 UGT2A3, GSTA1, GSTA2, GSTT2B, CYP1A1, SULT2A1, CYP2C9, ALDH3B2, CYP2E1,
CYP1A2, UGT1A1, UGT1A10, UGT2B17, UGT2B11, CYP2A6, UGT2B4, UGT2B15
hsa00982: drug metabolism – 25 GSTA1, CYP3A4, GSTA2, GSTT2B, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, ADH1B, ADH6, 2.08 × 10−27
cytochrome P450 ALDH3B2, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, UGT1A1, GSTM5, UGT1A10, UGT1A6, UGT2B17,
UGT1A8, ADH4, UGT1A4, UGT2B11, UGT2B4, CYP2A6, UGT2A3, UGT2B15
hsa05204: chemical 26 CYP3A4, ADH6, ADH1B, GSTM5, UGT1A6, UGT1A8, ADH4, UGT1A4, UGT2A3, 3.91 × 10−27
carcinogenesis GSTA1, GSTA2, GSTT2B, CYP1A1, SULT2A1, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, ALDH3B2, CYP2E1,
CYP1A2, UGT1A1, UGT1A10, UGT2B17, UGT2B11, CYP2A6, UGT2B4, UGT2B15
hsa00830: retinol metabolism 20 CYP3A4, CYP1A1, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, ADH1B, ADH6, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, 2.09 × 10−19
UGT1A10, UGT1A6, UGT2B17, UGT1A8, ADH4, UGT1A4, UGT2B11, CYP2A6,
UGT2B4, UGT2A3, UGT2B15
hsa00140: steroid hormone 15 CYP3A4, HSD17B2, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, UGT1A1, UGT1A10, UGT1A6, 3.09 × 10−12
biosynthesis UGT2B17, UGT1A8, UGT1A4, UGT2B11, UGT2B4, UGT2A3, UGT2B15
hsa00983: drug metabolism – 12 CYP3A4, UGT1A10, UGT1A6, UGT2B17, UGT1A8, UGT1A4, UGT2B11, UGT2B4, 3.98 × 10−9
other enzymes CYP2A6, UGT2A3, UGT2B15, UGT1A1
hsa00053: ascorbate and aldarate 10 UGT1A10, UGT1A6, UGT2B17, UGT1A8, UGT1A4, UGT2B11, UGT2B4, UGT2A3, 1.48 × 10−8
metabolism UGT2B15, UGT1A1
hsa00040: pentose and 10 UGT1A10, UGT1A6, UGT2B17, UGT1A8, UGT1A4, UGT2B11, UGT2B4, UGT2A3, 1.15 × 10−7
glucuronate interconversions UGT2B15, UGT1A1
hsa00860: porphyrin and 10 UGT1A10, UGT1A6, UGT2B17, UGT1A8, UGT1A4, UGT2B11, UGT2B4, UGT2A3, 1.21 × 10−6
chlorophyll metabolism UGT2B15, UGT1A1
Fig. 4 GO function enrichment analysis on the shared genes. GO refers to gene ontology; MF refers to molecular function; BP refers to the biologi-
cal process; and CC refers to the cell component.
10 genes for COAD (ACADS, p = 0.04706; ALDH3B2, p = and apoptosis of cells in READ. In COAD, quercetin may affect
0.01829; UGT2A3, p = 0.01827; AMH, p = 0.02271; CDKN2A, p = the progression of COAD in the following ways: impeding the
0.00739; FOSL1, p = 0.04264; CD36, p = 0.0455; CFL2, p = oxidation of fatty acids via down-regulation of ACADS
0.01355; CYP3A4, p = 0.00486; and MAF, p = 0.02138). These expression, enhancing the metabolism of anticancer medi-
genes are different from the currently reported targets in cell cations and reducing chemical carcinogenesis by down-regu-
experiments. lation of ALDH3B2 and UGT2A3 expression, improving
In PAAD, the CD36 high expression group has a higher sur- CYP3A4 expression, reducing the level of anti-Müllerian
vival rate than the low expression group, indicating that up- hormone, and lowering the risk of COAD by down-regulating
regulation of this gene can suppress the progress of PAAD the expression of AMH, performing anticancer function in the
(Fig. 6a). In READ, the SLCO1B1 (solute carrier organic anion later stage by up-regulation of CDKN2A, reducing the prolifer-
transporter family, member 1B1) high expression group has a ation of cancer cells by reducing FOSL1 expression, reducing
higher survival rate than the low expression group. Therefore, the expression of CFL2 to enhance the stiffness of cells, retard-
up-regulation of SLCO1B can inhibit READ (Fig. 6b). However, ing transcriptional misregulation by down-regulating the
in COAD, the ACADS, ALDH3B2, UGT2A3, AMH, CDKN2A, expression of MAF, and preventing cancer by mediating the
FOSL1, CD36, CFL2, and MAF high expression group shows a metabolism of glutathione.
lower survival probability than the low expression group, indi-
cating that up-regulation of these genes may accelerate the pro-
gression of COAD. In contrast, the CYP3A4 high expression
group has a higher survival rate than the low expression group, Discussion
indicating that down-regulation of this gene expression can
suppress the progression of COAD (Fig. 6c–l). Three databases, including the DrugBank database, TCGA,
and STRING, were jointly used in this study. They provided
informative and important sources for predicting the possible
Predicted mechanisms for quercetin to cure digestive cancers targets and mechanisms with respect to the effect of quercetin
From the combined results of the function enrichment ana- on different cancers. The DrugBank database combines
lysis and estimated survival rate-related gene expression, it can detailed drug (chemical, pharmacological, and pharma-
be deduced that quercetin may suppress the progression of ceutical) data with comprehensive drug target (sequence,
PAAD, COAD, and READ in different ways (Fig. 7). For PAAD, structure, and pathway) information. It is a comprehensive,
quercetin may enhance the adhesion of cells, mediate the freely accessible, online database containing information on
uptake of FAs, regulate TSP1 by increasing the expression of drugs and drug targets. TCGA is a landmark cancer genomics
CD36, and stimulate the immune response to prevent cancer. program, molecularly characterizing over 20 000 primary
In READ, quercetin may up-regulate the expression of cancers and matched normal samples spanning 33 cancer
SLCO1B1, regulate the polymorphism of SLCO1B1, and affect types. Up to now, TCGA has generated over 2.5 petabytes of
the uptake of medications to cure cancer. Quercetin can also genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data.
enhance the balance of redox reactions and affect the growth The STRING is a database used for searching and predicting
Term Name
Fig. 6 Kaplan–Meier survival estimate of common genes (P < 0.05). a. Survival curve of CD36 in PAAD; b. survival curve of SLCO1B1 in READ; and
c–l. survival curve of common genes in COAD. Red line refers to the gene high expression group. Green line refers to the gene low expression
group.
expression of E-cadherin, NF-κB, p65, TLR4 (anti-toll-like let surface and serves as a receptor for thrombospondin in
receptor), CB1-R (endocannabinoid reporter), and EMT platelets and various cell lines. Thrombospondins may have
markers (E-,N-catenin, Wnt/β-catenin, and snail).25 In this important functions as a cell adhesion molecule because they
study, ACADS, ALDH3B2, UGT2A3, AMH, CDKN2A, FOSL1, are widely distributed proteins involved in a variety of adhesive
CD36, CFL2, CYP3A4, and MAF were predicted as the targets processes.25–27 CD36 is also known as fatty acid translocase,
of quercetin to treat COAD. These differences may be due to which functions as a transmembrane protein and mediates
tumor cells that were used in previous studies, whereas mainly the uptake of FAs. It has been observed as highly expressed in
clinical samples were used in this study. Besides the known breast cancer tissues. Consistent with FA synthesis, FA uptake
digestive cancers, it was successfully predicted that READ may and transport are also important target pathways for anti-
be treated with quercetin via the target of SLCO1B1. These cancer therapy. Therefore, the FA channel protein CD36 may
targets may be diagnosis/prognosis markers and may contrib- provide a promising therapeutic target.28 CD36 has also been
ute to the therapeutic strategies for PAAD, COAD, and READ. found to be associated with gastric cancer by regulating throm-
CD36 was initially identified as the target of quercetin to bospondin-1 (TSP1), which is correlated with carcinogenesis
treat PAAD. CD36 is the fourth major glycoprotein of the plate- occurring in the cases of intestinal inflammation.29 However,
Fig. 7 Predicted mechanisms for quercetin suppressing the progression of PAAD, COAD, and READ. → refers to up-regulation, and ⊥ refers to
down-regulation.
it has not been reported that quercetin can mediate cancers by tion, transcriptional misregulation, stabilization of the tumor
regulating CD36. In this study, CD36 was found to be highly suppressor protein p53, the mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxi-
related to the occurrence of PAAD and COAD. In these two dation pathway, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome
cancers, the CD6 high expression group showed a higher survi- P450, and the mediation of male sexual differentiation. They
val rate than the CD6 low expression group. This illustrated are detailed as follows.
that quercetin may enhance the adhesion of cells, mediate the (1) FOSL1 (FOS-like antigen 1) enables positive regulation of
uptake of FAs, and regulate TSP1 by up-regulating the cell proliferation.33,37 The FOSL1 high expression group,
expression of CD36 in these cancers. showing a lower survival rate, indicated that quercetin may
SLCO1B1 was identified as the target of quercetin in COAD. reduce the proliferation of cancer cells by reducing the
This has not been previously reported. In terms of function, expression of FOSL1.
the protein encoded by this gene is a transmembrane receptor (2) MAF (v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma
which mediates the sodium-independent uptake of numerous oncogene homolog) is related to transcriptional misregulation
endogenous compounds.30 It has been reported that SLCO1B1 in cancer.33 In this study, the MAF high expression group
acts as a cellular uptake transporter for curcumin and its resulted in a low survival rate, indicating that transcriptional
major metabolites, and may also be applicable to patients misregulation may accelerate the progression of cancer.
undergoing breast cancer therapy.31 Quercetin and curcumin Quercetin can retard transcriptional misregulation by reducing
are both plant polyphenols. Therefore, SLCO1B1 may play a the expression of MAF and, thus, cure COAD.
similar role in the mechanisms of the treatment of READ by (3) CFL2 (cofilin 2) has been reported to enable positive
quercetin. SLCO1B1 also has been reported to harbor multiple regulation of actin filament depolymerization. The actin fila-
common polymorphism associated with methotrexate clear- ment is associated with the mechanical features of cells. Actin
ance, and methotrexate has been used to treat autoimmune filament depolymerization can reduce the stiffness of cells.35
diseases and malignancies, including acute lymphoblastic leu- In this study, the CFL2 high expression group had a lower sur-
kemia.32 In this study, the SLCO1B1 high expression group vival rate, suggesting that these cells have a lower degree of
also has a higher survival rate than the SLCO1B1 low expression stiffness. It was predicted that quercetin may reduce the
group. Currently, more and more studies show multiple drugs expression of CFL2 to enhance the stiffness of cells and, thus,
used together being more efficient than a single drug in treat- cure COAD.
ment of cancers. Therefore, it can be deduced that quercetin (4) CDKN2A (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) is an
could enhance the effect of other chemotherapeutic drugs inhibitor of CDK4 kinase. The product of CDKN2A is a stabil-
when they are used in combination, since it can enhance the izer of the tumor suppressor protein p53 as it can interact with
expression of SLCO1B1, regulate the polymorphism of and sequester the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MDM2 (a
SLCO1B1, and consequently affect the uptake of drugs to cure protein responsible for the degradation of p53). This gene is
READ. This mechanism might also be suitable for other com- frequently mutated or deleted in a variety of tumors, and it is
pounds with similar structures to quercetin, such as curcumin. recognized as an important tumor suppressor gene.36 In this
For COAD, many proteins related to metabolism were pre- study, the CDKN2A high expression group had a lower survival
dicted as the potential targets for quercetin, which had not rate at the early stage but a higher survival rate in the later
been previously reported. In terms of functions, these proteins stage. Quercetin might be able to perform its function at the
are related to cell proliferation, actin filament depolymeriza- later stage by enhancing the expression of CDKN2A.
(5) ACADS (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, C-2 to C-3 short chain) PAAD by increasing the expression of CD36 and stimulating
catalyzes the initial step of the mitochondrial fatty acid beta- the immune response to prevent cancer. SLCO1B1 was identi-
oxidation pathway. It was also identified as a potential diagno- fied as a target of quercetin to inhibit READ by up-regulating
sis/prognosis marker in bladder cancer.34 In this study, it was SLCO1B1 to influence the uptake of drugs used for curing and
predicted that quercetin may impede the oxidation of FA by preventing READ. In COAD, down-regulation of ACADS,
reducing the ACADS expression and finally lower the carcino- ALDH3B2, UGT2A3, CDKN2A, MAF, FOSL1 and CFL2 and up-
genesis of COAD. regulation of CYP3A4 might be responsible for the anticancer
(6) ALDH3B2 (aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member activity of quercetin towards READ.
B2), UGT2A3 (UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypep-
Published on 26 July 2019. Downloaded by Nottingham Trent University on 8/9/2019 10:56:12 AM.
lipopeptides in anti-cancer I: induction of apoptosis and prevention and treatment of melanoma, Mol. Nutr. Food
paraptosis and inhibition of autophagy in K562 cells, AMB Res., 2016, 60, 1264–1274.
Express, 2018, 8, 78. 21 Y. Shaik, A. Caraffa, G. Ronconi, G. Lessiani and P. Conti,
7 A. Haghi, H. Azimi and R. Rahimi, A comprehensive Impact of polyphenols on mast cells with special emphasis
review on pharmacotherapeutics of three phytochemicals, on the effect of quercetin and luteolin, Cent.
curcumin, quercetin, and allicin, in the treatment of Eur. J. Immunol., 2018, 43, 476–481.
gastric cancer, J. Gastrointest. Cancer, 2017, 48, 314– 22 Y. Graziani, E. Erikson and R. L. Erikson, The effect of
320. quercetin on the phosphorylation activity of the Rous
8 X. Zhao, Y. Zhang, J. Shi, Y. Liu, Y. Lu and Z. Lian, sarcoma virus transforming gene product in vitro and
Published on 26 July 2019. Downloaded by Nottingham Trent University on 8/9/2019 10:56:12 AM.
Biosynthesis of antibacterial compound against multidrug in vivo, Eur. J. Biochem., 1983, 135, 583–589.
resistant foodborne pathogens by Phomopsis sp XP-8, Food 23 R. Cermak, G. Kuhn and S. Wolffram, The flavonol querce-
Control, 2019, 95, 223–231. tin activates basolateral K(+) channels in rat distal colon
9 T. Boam, Anti-androgenic effects of flavonols in prostate epithelium, Br. J. Pharmacol., 2002, 135, 1183–1190.
cancer, Ecancermedicalscience, 2015, 9, 585. 24 J. Y. Kee, Y. H. Han, D. S. Kim, J. G. Mun, J. Park,
10 A. Rauf, M. Imran, I. A. Khan, M. Ur-Rehman, S. A. Gilani, M. Y. Jeong, J. Y. Um and S. H. Hong, Inhibitory effect of
Z. Mehmood and M. S. Mubarak, Anticancer potential of quercetin on colorectal lung metastasis through inducing
quercetin: A comprehensive review, Phytother. Res., 2018, apoptosis, and suppression of metastatic ability,
32, 2109–2130. Phytomedicine, 2016, 23, 1680–1690.
11 H. M. Eid and P. S. Haddad, The antidiabetic potential of 25 M. Brown and S. Ahmed, Emerging role of proprotein con-
quercetin: underlying mechanisms, Curr. Med. Chem., vertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 (PCSK-9) in inflammation
2017, 24, 355–364. and diseases, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 2019, 370, 170–177.
12 C. Y. Chen, C. L. Kao and C. M. Liu, The cancer prevention, 26 A. M. Enciu, E. Radu, I. D. Popescu, M. E. Hinescu and
anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidation of bioactive phyto- L. C. Ceafalan, Targeting CD36 as biomarker for metastasis
chemicals targeting the TLR4 signaling pathway, Int. J. Mol. prognostic: How far from translation into clinical practice?,
Sci., 2018, 19, 2729. BioMed Res. Int., 2018, 2018, 7801202.
13 Y. Graziani, E. Erikson and R. L. Erikson, The effect of 27 U. Trahtemberg and D. Mevorach, Apoptotic cells induced
quercetin on the phosphorylation activity of the Rous- signaling for immune homeostasis in macrophages and
Sarcoma virus transforming gene-product in vitro and dendritic cells, Front. Immunol., 2017, 8, 1356.
in vivo, Eur. J. Biochem., 1983, 135, 583–589. 28 J. Zhao, Z. Zhi, C. Wang, H. Xing, G. Song, X. Yu, Y. Zhu,
14 R. Cermak, G. Kuhn and S. Wolffram, The flavonol querce- X. Wang, X. Zhang and Y. Di, Exogenous lipids promote
tin activates basolateral K+ channels in rat distal colon epi- the growth of breast cancer cells via CD36, Oncol. Rep.,
thelium, Br. J. Pharmacol., 2002, 135, 1183–1190. 2017, 38, 2105–2115.
15 J. Lee, J. Lee, S. J. Kim and J. H. Kim, Quercetin-3-O-gluco- 29 H. Kashihara, M. Shimada, K. Yoshikawa, J. Higashijima,
side suppresses pancreatic cancer cell migration induced T. Tokunaga, M. Nishi, C. Takasu and D. Ishikawa,
by tumor-deteriorated growth factors in vitro, Oncol. Rep., Correlation between thrombospondin-1 expression in non-
2016, 35, 2473–2479. cancer tissue and gastric carcinogenesis, Anticancer Res.,
16 J. Lee, S. I. Han, J. H. Yun and J. H. Kim, Quercetin 3-O-glu- 2017, 37, 3547–3552.
coside suppresses epidermal growth factor-induced 30 M. Hong, W. Hong, C. Ni, J. Huang and C. Zhou, Protein
migration by inhibiting EGFR signaling in pancreatic kinase C affects the internalization and recycling of organic
cancer cells, Tumor Biol., 2015, 36, 9385–9393. anion transporting polypeptide 1B1, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,
17 J. H. Kim, M. J. Kim, K. C. Choi and J. Son, Quercetin sensi- 2015, 1848, 2022–2030.
tizes pancreatic cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis 31 N. Jaerapong, Q. A. Jamil, J. Riha, D. Milovanovic,
through JNK-mediated cFLIP turnover, Int. J. Biochem. Cell G. Krupitza, B. Stieger, K. Jarukomjorn and W. Jager,
Biol., 2016, 78, 327–334. Organic anion-transporting polypeptides contribute to the
18 J. Levy, I. Teuerstein, M. Marbach, S. Radian and uptake of curcumin and its main metabolites by human
Y. Sharoni, Tyrosine protein kinase activity in the dmba- breast cancer cells: Impact on antitumor activity, Oncol.
induced rat mammary-tumor-inhibitor by quercetin, Rep., 2019, 41, 2558–2566.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1984, 123, 1227–1233. 32 L. B. Ramsey, G. H. Bruun, W. Yang, L. R. Trevino,
19 D. Szklarczyk, A. Franceschini, S. Wyder, K. Forslund, S. Vattathil, P. Scheet, C. Cheng, G. L. Rosner,
D. Heller, J. Huerta-Cepas, M. Simonovic, A. Roth, K. M. Giacomini, Y. Fan, A. Sparreboom, T. S. Mikkelsen,
A. Santos, K. P. Tsafou, M. Kuhn, P. Bork, L. J. Jensen and T. J. Corydon, C. H. Pui, W. E. Evans and M. V. Relling,
C. von Mering, STRING v10: protein-protein interaction Rare versus common variants in pharmacogenetics:
networks, integrated over the tree of life, Nucleic Acids Res., SLCO1B1 variation and methotrexate disposition, Genome
2015, 43, D447–D452. Res., 2012, 22, 1–8.
20 F. Liu-Smith and F. L. Meyskens, Molecular mechanisms of 33 J. E. Norman, H. H. Aung, D. W. Wilson and J. C. Rutledge,
flavonoids in melanin synthesis and the potential for the Inhibition of perilipin 2 expression reduces pro-inflamma-
tory gene expression and increases lipid droplet size, Food migration through the ERK/AP-1 signaling pathway, J. Cell.
Funct., 2018, 9, 6246–6257. Physiol., 2019, 234, 3598–3612.
34 C. P. Liu, J. H. Zhang, S. C. Zheng, J. Liu and J. C. Guo, A 38 T. V. Clendenen, W. Z. Ge, K. L. Koenig, Y. Afanasyeva,
novel clinical multidimensional transcriptome signature C. Agnoli, L. A. Brinton, F. Darvishian, J. F. Dorgan,
predicts prognosis in bladder cancer, Oncol. Rep., 2018, 40, A. H. Eliassen, R. T. Falk, G. Hallmans, S. E. Hankinson,
2826–2835. J. Hoffman-Bolton, T. J. Key, V. Krogh, H. B. Nichols,
35 S. M. Haghparast, T. Kihara and J. Miyake, Distinct D. P. Sandler, M. J. Schoemaker, P. M. Sluss, M. Sund,
mechanical behavior of HEK293 cells in adherent and sus- A. J. Swerdlow, K. Visvanathan, A. Zeleniuch-Jacquotte and
pended states, PeerJ, 2015, 3, e1131. M. L. Liu, Breast cancer risk prediction in women aged
Published on 26 July 2019. Downloaded by Nottingham Trent University on 8/9/2019 10:56:12 AM.
36 N. Ghobadi, M. Mehramiz, S. ShahidSales, A. R. Brojerdi, 35–50 years: impact of including sex hormone concen-
K. Anvari, M. Khazaei, M. Rezayi, M. S. Khorrami, M. Joudi- trations in the Gail model, Breast Cancer Res., 2019, 21, 12.
Mashhad, H. Ramshini, S. Ahmadi-Simab, A. Moradi, 39 J. Liu, Y. Huang, A. Kumar, A. Tan, S. Jin, A. Mozhi and
S. M. Hassanian, M. Ghayour-Mobarhan, M. T. Boroushaki, X. J. Liang, pH-sensitive nano-systems for drug delivery in
G. A. Ferns and A. Avan, A genetic variant in CDKN2A/2B cancer therapy, Biotechnol. Adv., 2014, 32, 693–710.
locus was associated with poor prognosis in patients with 40 A. Hernandez-Ruiz, B. Garcia-Villanova, E. Guerra-
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, J. Cell. Physiol., 2019, Hernandez, P. Amiano, M. Ruiz-Canela and E. Molina-
234, 5070–5076. Montes, A review of a priori defined oxidative balance
37 Y. Han, X. Zhao, Y. Sun, Y. Sui and J. Liu, Effects of FOSL1 scores relative to their components and impact on health
silencing on osteosarcoma cell proliferation, invasion and outcomes, Nutrients, 2019, 11, 774.