Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table 1. Calculated nutrient profiles of the DASH- sure was significantly lower for participants eating the DASH
Sodium and control diets at the lower sodium level* diet compared with those eating the control diet. The
DASH-Sodium findings held in all subgroups [6••,16•,17].
DASH- Although the effects on blood pressure of the DASH diet
Sodium Control
and sodium reduction were not fully additive, the lowest
Protein, g 94.3 74.5 blood pressures were consistently observed when individu-
Protein, % kcal 18 14.3 als ate the DASH diet at the lowest sodium level.
Carbohydrate, g 306 256
Carbohydrate, % kcal 58.5 49
Total fat, g 63.1 87.1
Total fat, % kcal 27.2 37.6 Other Studies Using the DASH Eating Pattern
Saturated fat, g 14.4 35.7 The Diet, Exercise, and Weight Loss Intervention Trial
Saturated fat, % kcal 6.2 15.4 (DEW-IT) [18•] was a 9-week, randomized, controlled,
Monounsaturated fat, g 25.9 28.5 feeding trial that incorporated weight loss, sodium reduc-
Monounsaturated fat, % kcal 11.2 12.3 tion, increased physical activity, and a hypocaloric version
Polyunsaturated fat, g 18.1 16.4 of the DASH diet. Participants were overweight or obese
Polyunsaturated fat, % kcal 7.8 7.1
and taking a stable dose of an antihypertensive medica-
Cholesterol, mg 128 272
Total dietary fiber, g 29.9 10.8 tion. The DEW-IT physical activity, diet, and gradual
Potassium, mg 4538 1741 weight-loss goals were well accepted by the participants.
Magnesium, mg 498 173 The intervention resulted in blood pressure reductions
Calcium, mg 1260 453 similar to those from pharmacotherapy (9.5/5.3 mm Hg
Zinc, mg 12.1 7.7 compared with the control group) and similar to the blood
Thiamin, mg 1.7 1.4 pressure effects found in the nonmedicated hypertensive
Riboflavin, mg 2.1 1.4
participants in the DASH-Sodium trial. It also resulted in
Niacin (nicotinic acid), mg 24.1 22.6
Vitamin B6, mg 2.8 1.4 favorable effects on fitness and serum total and low-
Vitamin B12, µg 3.8 3.1 density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels [18•]. Despite
Vitamin C, mg 300 143 the limited number of participants (n=23 in the control
Vitamin E, mg/d tocopherol units 14 7.9 group and n=22 in the intervention group), the blood
Sodium, mg (lower level) 1226 1162 pressure effects were statistically significant.
*Mean of 7-day menus at the 2100-kcal level from the DASH-Sodium
The multicenter PREMIER trial [19] tested the effects on
trial. Percentages of calories from unsaturated fatty acids do not add up blood pressure of two intensive behavioral interventions
to percentage of calories from total fat because the glycerol content of compared with an advice-only intervention. Participants were
the fatty acids was not included. In addition, the percentages of calories
from macronutrients may exceed 100% because they were calculated
810 community-dwelling adults with above-optimal blood
using the Atwater factors, which do not fully account for nonavailable pressure or stage 1 hypertension who were not taking anti-
carbohydrates. This particularly occurs with high-carbohydrate, hypertensive medication. Those randomized into the “estab-
high-fiber diets such as DASH.
DASH—Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension.
lished plus DASH” intervention received counseling on
established guidelines for blood pressure control, including
weight loss, sodium reduction, increased physical activity, and
beneficial for blood pressure reduction [15]. As with the limited alcohol intake. In addition, they were counseled to
DASH trial, participants were provided with all of their follow the DASH diet. Goals included nine to 12 servings per
food during the study. The nutrient contents of the DASH day of fruits and vegetables, two to three servings per day of
and control diets at the lower sodium level for the 2100 low-fat dairy products, 7% or less of energy from saturated fat,
kcal menu are shown in Table 1. The nutrient contents and 25% or less of energy from total fat. As a strategy for
were calculated from Moore’s Extended Nutrient (MENu) weight loss, this intervention recommended substituting
database (Version 3.1, Pennington Biomedical Research fruits and vegetables for high-fat, high-calorie foods.
Foundation, Baton Rouge, LA). Detailed explanations of The PREMIER trial “established” intervention also
the DASH-Sodium trial’s rationale and design [15] and the offered counseling on established guidelines for blood pres-
main findings [6••,16•] appear elsewhere. sure control, but it did not include counseling on the DASH
Of the 412 study participants, 94% completed the study diet, and thus did not have goals for fruit and vegetable or
and provided blood pressure measurements during each dairy intake. It did recommend weight loss, reduced sodium
intervention period. For participants in each diet arm, the intake, increased physical activity, and limited alcohol intake.
study found significant, stepwise reductions in blood pres- It also recommended 10% or less of energy intake from satu-
sure in going from the “higher” to “intermediate” to “lower” rated fats and 30% or less of energy intake from total fat, and
sodium levels (Fig. 2). Blood pressure reductions from substituting fruits and vegetables for high-fat and high-
reduced sodium intakes were significantly greater for partici- calorie foods. An “advice-only” group, which served as the
pants eating the control diet than those eating the DASH control intervention, received advice about lifestyle modifi-
diet. The study found that for each sodium level, blood pres- cations for blood pressure control.
The DASH Diet and Blood Pressure • Craddick et al. 487
Figure 2. Effect on systolic blood pressure of reduced sodium intake and the Dietary
Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. The mean systolic blood pressures are shown
for the high-sodium control diet. The mean changes in blood pressure are shown for various
sodium levels (solid lines), and the mean differences in blood pressure between the DASH and
control diets at each level of sodium intake are shown (dotted lines). Unidirectional arrows are
used for simplicity, although the order in which participants were given the sodium levels was
random, with a crossover design. The numbers next to the dotted lines connecting the data
points are the mean changes in systolic blood pressure. The 95% CIs are given in parentheses.
There was a significant difference in systolic blood pressure between the high-sodium and low-
sodium phases of the control diet (mean, -6.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, -5.4 to -8.0; P<0.001) and the
DASH diet (mean, -3.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.7 to -4.3; P<0.001) and between the high-sodium
phase of the control diet and the low-sodium phase of the DASH diet (mean, -8.9 mm Hg; 95%
CI, -6.7 to -11.1; P<0.001). Asterisks (P<0.05), daggers (P<0.01), and double daggers
(P<0.001) indicate significant differences in systolic blood pressure between groups or
between sodium categories. (Data from Sacks et al. [6••].)
Participants in both PREMIER behavioral interventions was demonstrated in DASH-Sodium and other trials
accomplished substantial weight loss, reduced sodium [6••,21], it is likely that the effects of multiple lifestyle
intake, and increased physical fitness [20••]. In addition, changes on blood pressure are not fully additive. Second, the
persons assigned to the “established plus DASH” interven- dietary contrast between the “established” and the “estab-
tion significantly increased their intake of fruits and vegeta- lished plus DASH” groups was less than that in the original
bles and dairy products relative to the other two groups DASH studies. Because the PREMIER study was not a feeding
(Table 2). After 6 months, both intervention groups signifi- study like DASH and DASH-Sodium, the community-
cantly lowered blood pressure relative to the advice-only dwelling participants in the “established plus DASH” group
group (3.7/1.7 mm Hg for “established” and 4.3/2.6 mm did not fully adopt the DASH diet. In addition, participants
Hg for “established plus DASH”). Blood pressure reductions in the “established” group ate a healthier diet than the
were greatest for participants in the “established plus DASH” control diet used in the DASH and DASH-Sodium studies.
group, although the difference between the two interven- Another randomized, controlled trial tested the hypo-
tions did not achieve statistical significance [20••]. The thesis that the DASH diet enhances the blood pressure
prevalence of hypertension, which was approximately 38% response to antihypertensive medication in patients with
at baseline in all three groups, decreased to 12% in the stages 1 and 2 hypertension, using the angiotensin receptor
“established plus DASH” group, 17% in the “established” blocker losartan [22•]. The study found that the DASH diet
group, and 26% in the “advice-only” group at 6 months. at sodium levels slightly below US consumption in combi-
Hypertension prevalence thus was significantly less for the nation with losartan significantly reduced blood pressure
two active interventions compared with the “advice-only” compared with losartan and a control diet. These findings
group. The difference in hypertension prevalence between suggest that the DASH diet may be a useful adjuvant therapy
the “established plus DASH” and “established” groups did for patients currently taking angiotensin receptor blockers.
not achieve statistical significance [20••]. The mean incremental blood pressure response to the
The lack of a significant incremental benefit in the “estab- DASH diet in this study was intermediate to those found in
lished plus DASH” group compared with the “established” the DASH and DASH-Sodium studies, possibly due to the
group presumably reflects a combination of factors. First, as smaller number of participants [22•]. Patients with higher
Table 2. Changes in lifestyle factors from baseline to 6 months among participants in the PREMIER trial
488
baseline plasma renin activity had greater blood pressure 30 observational studies have reported a direct association
responses to the DASH diet and losartan, implying an between blood levels of homocysteine and CVD [29].
interaction with the renin-angiotensin system. The renin- Nutrients known to affect homocysteine levels include
angiotensin system is further implicated in the blood folate and possibly vitamins B6 and B12 [30,31]. Because
pressure-lowering effect of the DASH dietary pattern by the DASH diet is rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains,
evidence of genetic modulation of this effect. Specifically, and dairy, and contains these nutrients, the DASH diet
the systolic blood pressure response to the DASH diet is could be expected to have a beneficial effect on homo-
greatest in individuals with the AA polymorphism of the cysteine. Appel et al. [32•] studied 118 participants from
angiotensinogen gene (-6.9 mm Hg) and least in those with one DASH clinical center and found that, compared with
the GG polymorphism (-2.8 mm Hg) (P for trend=0.08 for the control diet, the DASH diet reduced serum levels of
systolic blood pressure) [23]. homocysteine by 0.8 µmol/L (P=0.03).
9. Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, et al.: A clinical trial of 22.• Conlin PR, Erlinger TP, Bohannon A, et al.: The DASH diet
the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH enhances the blood pressure response to losartan in
Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 1997, hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2003, 16:337–342.
336:1117–1124. Clinical trial to assess the blood pressure response to the DASH diet
10. Sacks FM, Obarzanek E, Windhauser MM, et al.: Rationale and and an antihypertensive medication, losartan, in 55 hypertensive
design of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension trial participants. The DASH diet was found to enhance the blood
(DASH). A multicenter controlled-feeding study of dietary pat- pressure reduction from losartan.
terns to lower blood pressure. Ann. Epidemiol 1995, 5:108–118. 23. Svetkey LP, Moore TJ, Simons-Morton DG, et al.: Angiotensino-
11. Karanja NM, Obarzanek E, Lin PH, et al.: Descriptive character- gen genotype and blood pressure response in the Dietary
istics of the dietary patterns used in the Dietary Approaches Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) study. J Hypertens
to Stop Hypertension Trial. DASH Collaborative Research 2001, 19:1949–1956.
Group. J Am Diet Assoc 1999, 99:S19–S27. 24. US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US Department of
12. Lin PH, Windhauser MM, Plaisted CS, et al.: The Linear Health and Human Services: Nutrition and Your Health:
Index Model for establishing nutrient goals in the Dietary Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Aim for Fitness Build a
Approaches to Stop Hypertension trial. DASH Collaborative Healthy Base. Aim for Fitness Build a Healthy Base
Research Group. J Am Diet Assoc 1999, 99:S40–S44. Choose Sensibly. Fifth Edition 2000 No. 232. 2000.
13. Moore TJ, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, et al.: Effect of dietary 25. NHLBI, National Cholesterol Education Program: Detection,
patterns on ambulatory blood pressure : results from the Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Trial. Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report.
DASH Collaborative Research Group. Hypertension 1999, [No. 02-5215]. Washington, DC: NIH Publication; 2002.
34:472–477. 26. Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, et al.: AHA Dietary Guide-
14. Svetkey LP, Simons-Morton D, et al.: Effects of dietary lines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals
patterns on blood pressure: subgroup analysis of the Dietary from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart
Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) randomized Association. Circulation 2000, 102:2284–2299.
clinical trial. Arch Intern Med 1999, 159:285–293. 27.•• Obarzanek E, Sacks FM, Vollmer WM, et al.: Effects on blood
15. Svetkey LP, Sacks FM, Obarzanek E, et al.: The DASH Diet, lipids of a blood pressure-lowering diet: the Dietary
Sodium Intake and Blood Pressure Trial (DASH-sodium): Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Trial. Am J Clin
rationale and design. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Nutr 2001, 74:80–89.
Group. J Am Diet Assoc 1999, 99:S96–S104. Studied the effects of diet on plasma lipids, focusing on subgroups by
16.• Vollmer WM, Sacks FM, Ard J, et al.: Effects of diet and sodium sex, race, and baseline lipid concentrations in 436 participants from
intake on blood pressure: subgroup analysis of the DASH- the DASH trial. Compared with the control diet, the DASH diet
sodium trial. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135:1019–1028. resulted in lower total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol, without significant
Evaluated effects on blood pressure of reduced sodium intake and effects on triacylglycerol, and thus is likely to reduce coronary heart
the DASH diet in the DASH-Sodium trial subgroups. Generally, in disease risk.
all subgroups, the DASH diet and reduced sodium intake were each 28. Appel LJ, Sacks FM, Harsha D, et al.: The effects of sodium
associated with significant decreases in blood pressure; these two reduction on blood lipids; results from the DASH-Sodium
factors combined produced the greatest reductions. feeding study [abstract]. Hypertension 2003, in press.
17. Vollmer WM, Sacks FM, Svetkey LP: New insights into the 29. Boushey CJ, Beresford SA, Omenn GS, Motulsky AG: A quanti-
effects on blood pressure of diets low in salt and high tative assessment of plasma homocysteine as a risk factor
in fruits and vegetables and low-fat dairy products. for vascular disease. Probable benefits of increasing folic
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2001, 2:71–74. acid intakes. JAMA 1995, 274:1049–1057.
18.• Miller ER III, Erlinger TP, Young DR, et al.: Results of the Diet, 30. Clarke R, Armitage J: Vitamin supplements and cardiovascular
Exercise, and Weight Loss Intervention Trial (DEW-IT). risk: review of the randomized trials of homocysteine-
Hypertension 2002, 40:612–618. lowering vitamin supplements. Semin Thromb Hemost 2000,
The DEW-IT trial studied the association of the DASH diet and exer- 26:341–348.
cise with ambulatory blood pressure, serum lipids, weight, and fitness 31. Verhaar MC, Stroes E, Rabelink TJ: Folates and cardiovascular
in 44 hypertensive, overweight adults on a single blood pressure med- disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002, 22:6–13.
ication. The comprehensive lifestyle intervention was found to sub- 32.• Appel LJ, Miller ER III, Jee SH, et al.: Effect of dietary patterns
stantially lower blood pressure and improve blood pressure control. on serum homocysteine: results of a randomized, controlled
19. Svetkey LP, Harsha DW, Vollmer WM, et al.: Premier: a clinical feeding study. Circulation 2000, 102:852–857.
trial of comprehensive lifestyle modification for blood pres- This study found that the DASH diet significantly reduced fasting
sure control: rationale, design and baseline characteristics. levels of total serum homocysteine. Because elevated blood levels of
Ann Epidemiol 2003, 13:462–471. homocysteine are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic
20.•• Writing Group of the PREMIER Collaborative Research Group: cardiovascular disease, these results provide additional insights into
Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on blood the mechanisms by which diet might influence the occurrence of
pressure control: main results of the PREMIER clinical trial. atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
JAMA 2003, 289:2083–2093. 33. Parks EJ, Hellerstein MK: Carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylg-
Studied the effect on blood pressure of two multicomponent behav- lycerolemia: historical perspective and review of biological
ioral interventions over 6 months in 810 community-dwelling adults. mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2000, 71:412–433.
Both significantly reduced weight, improved fitness, and lowered 34. Cook NR, Cohen J, Hebert PR, et al.: Implications of small
sodium intake, and the intervention that included the DASH diet reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary preven-
also increased fruit, vegetable, and dairy intake. tion. Arch Intern Med 1995, 155:701–709.
21. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research
Group: Effects of weight loss and sodium reduction interven-
tion on blood pressure and hypertension incidence in over-
weight people with high-normal blood pressure. The Trials
of Hypertension Prevention, phase II. Arch Intern Med 1997,
157:657–667.