CENTRAL BENDIGO FLOOD STUDY –

DETAILED MITIGATION SUMMARY REPORT

OCTOBER 2021

PREPARED FOR

City of Greater Bendigo

 Project Details

Title Central Bendigo Flood Study – Detailed Mitigation Summary Report

Prepared for City of Greater Bendigo

Document Name 30105-CoGB-CentralBendigoFloodStudy-DetailedMitgationSummaryReport-

A

Document Control

Approved for Issue

Revision Author Reviewer
Name Signature Report Date

A SJH JLS J. Skipworth JLS 27/10/2021

Revision Status

Revision Description

A Draft Detailed Mitigation Summary Report

COPYRIGHT AND NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE

The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by Water Modelling Solutions (WMS). The report may not be
copied or used without our prior written consent for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report.

The sole purpose of this report and the associated services performed by WMS is to provide the information required in accordance
with the scope of services set out in the contract between WMS and the Client. That scope of services was defined by the requests
of the Client, by the time and budgetary constraints imposed by the Client, and by the availability of data and other relevant
information.

In preparing this report, WMS has assumed that all data, reports and any other information provided to us by the Client, on behalf
of the Client, or by third parties is complete and accurate, unless stated otherwise.

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................1
2 Community Consultation ...................................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Summary of First Round of Community Consultation ............................................................................................................................2
3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment ............................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Option D1 – Back Creek (North of McIvor Road) ......................................................................................................................................5
3.2 Option D2 – Back Creek (South of McIvor Road) ......................................................................................................................................7
3.3 Option D3 – Back Creek (Increased Channel Capacity) ..........................................................................................................................8
3.4 Option D4 – Increased Bridge Conveyance ............................................................................................................................................. 10
3.5 Option D5 – Bendigo Creek (Between Myrtle Street and Short Street) ............................................................................................ 12
3.6 Option D6 – Bendigo Creek Increased Channel Capacity .................................................................................................................... 13
4 Sensitivity Testing .............................................................................................................................................................. 14
5 Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................ 15

APPENDICES
Appendix A Flood MapS

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 First Round Consultation Results .................................................................................................................................. 2

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Project Boundary .......................................................................................................................................................... 1
Figure 3-1 Mitigation Option Locations ......................................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 3-2 Location of Mitigation Option D1.................................................................................................................................. 5
Figure 3-3 Typical Back Creek Cross-section (Concrete Lined Channel) ....................................................................................... 6
Figure 3-4 Location of Mitigation Option D2.................................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 3-5 Location of Mitigation Option D3.................................................................................................................................. 8
Figure 3-6 Example of Mitigation Option D4 ................................................................................................................................ 11
Figure 3-7 Location of Mitigation Option D5................................................................................................................................ 12
Figure 3-8 Location of Mitigation Option D6................................................................................................................................ 13

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report Page ii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

AEP Annual Exceedance Probability

ARR Australian Rainfall and Runoff
BoM Bureau of Meteorology
CBD Central Business District
CoGB City of Greater Bendigo
DELWP Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning
DEM Digital Elevation Model
DTM Digital Terrain Model
LiDAR Light Detection and Ranging
NCCMA North Central Catchment Management Authority
RCP Representative Concentration Pathway
RFFE Regional Flood Frequency Estimation
RoG Rain-on-Grid
SA Source-Area Boundary
SES State Emergency Services
WMS Water Modelling Solutions

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report Page iii

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

The study area is focused on Central Bendigo, which is traversed by Bendigo Creek and Back Creek. The suburb of Bendigo
(Postcode 3550) has a population of approximately 5,500 residents and a significant visiting working population, with the Bendigo
CBD being an important regional commercial and retail hub. Bendigo is predominately a residential area and has undergone steady
growth in recent years with a number of new multi-lot residential developments, including several in close proximity to Bendigo
Creek. The extents of the study area are illustrated in Figure 1-1. Bendigo Creek flows through the study area from south to north
towards Huntly and is heavily modified as a result of habitation and extensive, historical mining activity through the area. There are
extensive sections of lined channel within the study area, sections of which are constructed of bluestone, and subject to heritage
overlays. Back Creek also traverses the eastern portion of the study area and flows into Bendigo Creek a short distance to the north
of Bendigo CBD.

The study area was the subject of a comprehensive flood investigation in 2013 – the Bendigo Urban Flood Study (BUFS). The study
determined that significant flood risk occurred through this area with numerous properties inundated in the 1% AEP event.

For the purpose of this study, City of Greater Bendigo aims to build on the findings of the 2013 study and to refine options to mitigate
flooding in Central Bendigo. A comprehensive community consultation process was undertaken, seeking community feedback and
suggestions for potential mitigation options. From the consultation process and stakeholder workshops, 39 mitigation options were
collated and included as part of preliminary mitigation modelling. Details of each of the 39 options are reported in the Preliminary
Mitigation Summary Report (WMS, 2021).

Based on the results from preliminary modelling, six mitigation schemes were selected for further detailed modelling and analysis.
This summary report outlines the results of the six mitigation schemes selected.

Figure 1-1 Project Boundary

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 1 Introduction Page 1

2 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION

2.1 SUMMARY OF FIRST ROUND OF COMMUNITY CONSULTATION

Effective community consultation is a critical part to the success of the Central Bendigo Flood Study. The consultation to date has
been aimed at gathering general flood information as well as potential mitigation ideas, many of which will be tested in the modelling.
The first round of community consultation occurred over a 9-week period from the 21st of June to 20th August 2021. It included the
following:

• A survey in both hard-copy and online format (bit.ly/CBFS_SurveyA) which asked for historic observations of flooding as
well as mitigation ideas for testing.

• An online mapping portal (bit.ly/CBFS_FloodMap) which presented the draft 1% AEP modelling results and allows users
to add comments and mitigation ideas. The mapping portal will be used further when it comes to presenting the results
of mitigation modelling.

• Due to COVID19 restrictions at the time, in person workshops were moved to two online zoom sessions with the initial
session occurring on the 10 th of August with the second on the 17th of August. The workshop allowed the current flood
risk to be presented, questions to be asked and then feedback and mitigation ideas to be gathered. With consideration to
the limitations due to COVID19, we consider the workshop attendance and level of engagement to be highly successful
and a reflection of the adaptability of and the well-planned and targeted consultation strategy developed by Make a Change
Australia in partnership with WMS. Statistics of the first consultation round are summarised in Table 2-1. During the period
of consultation, a total of 80 mitigation options and comments were collated. The full list included a number of duplicate
or very similar options as well a number of general comments that didn’t relate to specific locations. From this list a total
of 35 options were found to be appropriate for modelling, either for preliminary structural mitigation modelling or for
sensitivity testing. The preliminary modelling is described in the following section.

Table 2-1 First Round Consultation Results

Direct Communication Emails Approximately 160 emails

Flyer Distribution/One-One Conversations 52 businesses and organisations

Letterbox Drop Approximately 4,000 properties

Jumpleads Newsletter Feature Distributions Approximately 6,000 emails

Social Media Reach Approximately 8,300

Media Responses 3 x Newspaper articles, 1 x radio interview

Workshop Registrations 31 (Week 1) & 23 (Week 2)

Workshop Attendance 14 (Week 1) & 10 (Week 2)

Survey Responses 23

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 2 Community Consultation Page 2

3 DETAILED MITIGATION OPTIONS ASSESSMENT
The following sections present the results of each of the six detailed mitigation schemes. A summary table is provided for each
scheme. Maps of impacts on water levels for the 1% AEP and 10% AEP flood event are provided for each scheme and can be found
in Appendix A. The various locations for mitigation option D4 are illustrated in Figure 3-2 with the remainder of the options shown
in Figure 3-1 below.

Figure 3-1 Mitigation Option Locations

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 3

Figure 3-2 Locations of Mitigation Option D4

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 4

3.1 OPTION D1 – BACK CREEK (NORTH OF MCIVOR ROAD)

Mitigation Option ID D1

Option Details Option D1 is illustrated in Figure 3-3 and includes the following:
• Increased capacity of Back Creek by decreasing creek elevation underneath
Hopetoun Street Bridge to level of existing low flow drain (as illustrated in ).
• Adopt 700mm levee (average height) on the western embankment of Back Creek
commencing 100m downstream of McIvor Road Bridge and concluding at
Hopetoun Street.
• Adopt one-way valves on pipe discharging from Larritt Street drainage line to Back
Creek.
• Approximate Cost: $270,901

Impacts in the 1% AEP Flood Event This option increases the conveyance underneath Hopetoun Street Bridge by increasing the
capacity of Back Creek whilst preventing flows from breaking out of Back Creek with the
adoption of the levee. The one-way valve on the existing drainage networks prevents the
drainage line surcharging into Larritt Street.

12 properties previously at risk in the 1% AEP event are now flood free with 35 properties
have significantly reduced flood depths

Impacts in the 10% AEP Flood Event 5 previously at-risk properties now flood free in the 10% AEP flood event.

Increased Creek Capacity

Levee (Height approx. 700mm on average)

One-Way Valve

Figure 3-3 Location of Mitigation Option D1

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 5

 Existing Creek Increased Creek Capacity

Figure 3-4 Typical Cross-section beneath Hopetoun Street Bridge

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 6

3.2 OPTION D2 – BACK CREEK (SOUTH OF MCIVOR ROAD)

Mitigation Option ID D2

Option Details Option D2 is illustrated in Figure 3-5 and includes the following:
• Increased conveyance capacity under Abbotts Bridge via adoption of 2 x 1.8m x
1.8m box culverts on either side of the existing bridge abutments.
• Approximate Cost: $327, 275

Impacts in the 1% AEP Flood Event
This option increases the conveyance underneath Abbotts Street Bridge by adopting culverts
at either side of the existing bridge structure. Previous iterations of the detailed analysis
adopted levees on each embankment of Back Creek. Ongoing discussions found although
there were significant benefits from a flood mitigation perspective, adoption of levees with
the required height would not be feasible from a constructability and public approval
perspective thus was omitted from Option D2.

Some increases in flood height at both the upstream and downstream end of the each of the
culverts due to increase creek capacity at either end. No overall benefits or adverse impacts
in the 1% AEP flood event.

Impacts in the 10% AEP Flood Event Very minor decreases in flood height on Abbotts Street and Havlin Street (approximately
15mm) in the 10% AEP flood event. It is anticipated that benefits will be observed in AEP
events between the 1% AEP and 10% AEP with those results becoming available along with
the final report.

D2 Additional Box Culverts (1.8m x 1.8m)

Figure 3-5 Location of Mitigation Option D2

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 7

3.3 OPTION D3 – BACK CREEK (INCREASED CHANNEL CAPACITY)

Mitigation Option ID D3

Option Details Option D3 is illustrated in Figure 3-6 and includes the following:
• Increased capacity of Back Creek by lowering eastern side of back creek to level of
existing low flow drain (as illustrated in Figure 3-6) commencing approximately 40m
upstream of the confluence of Bendigo Creek and Back Creek
• Approximate Cost: $942, 747

Impacts in the 1% AEP Flood Event This option increases the volumetric capacity of Back Creek with lowering of the Creek invert.

91 at risk properties with significantly reduced flood depths in the 1% AEP event with 6
additional previously at-risk properties no longer inundated.

Impacts in the 10% AEP Flood Event 4 previously at-risk properties with significantly reduced flood depths in the 10% AEP event
with 6 additional previously at-risk properties no longer inundated.

Increased Creek Capacity

Figure 3-6 Location of Mitigation Option D3

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 8

 Existing Creek Increased Creek Capacity

Figure 3-7 Typical Back Creek Cross-section (Concrete Lined Channel)

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 9

3.4 OPTION D4 – INCREASED BRIDGE CONVEYANCE

Mitigation Option ID D4

Option Details D4 involves increasing the conveyance underneath bridges with several bridges in the
existing conditions causing constriction of flows in both Back Creek and Bendigo Creek
resulting in the embankments overtopping. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify
individual bridges which were causing inundation of properties in the 1% AEP flood event.
These bridges include:
• Back Creek
– Hopetoun Street Bridge
– Pedestrian Crossing upstream of Hargreaves Street
– Hargreaves Street Bridge
– McCrae Street Bridge
– Pedestrian Crossing upstream of Bendigo/Back Creek confluence
• Bendigo Creek
– Thistle Street Bridge
– Myrtle Street Bridge
– Wattle Street Bridge
– Short Street Bridge
– Bayne Street Bridge
– Nolan Street Bridge
– Weeroona Street Bridge
• The conveyance capacity was increased by lowering the eastern side of the
respective creek underneath the identified bridge to the level of the low flow drain
(similar to D1 illustrated in Figure 3-6).
• An example location of option D4 is illustrated in Figure 3-8 which also shows a levee
adopted on the western side of Back Creek approximately 30m downstream of
McCrae Street.
• Approximate Cost: $771, 043

Impacts in the 1% AEP Flood Event 139 previously at-risk properties have significantly reduced flood depths (up to 200mm) on
properties adjacent to the identified bridges.

Some adverse impacts are observed at 16 properties on Bayne Street and Lucan Street
(adjacent to confluence of Bendigo Creek and Back Creek) with depths increased marginally.
It is anticipated that this slight increase can be resolved by increasing the volumetric capacity
of Bendigo Creek at Bayne Street Bridge.

Impacts in the 10% AEP Flood Event 4 previously at-risk properties with reduced flood depths in the 10% AEP event located on
Baxter Street, North of McIvor Road Bridge.

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 10

 Levee (Average Height = 210.5 mAHD)

Increased Creek Capacity

Figure 3-8 Example of Mitigation Option D4

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 11

3.5 OPTION D5 – BENDIGO CREEK (BETWEEN MYRTLE STREET AND SHORT STREET)

Mitigation Option ID D5

Option Details Option D5 is illustrated in Figure 3-9 and includes the following:
• Increased capacity of Bendigo Creek by lowering south-eastern side of the creek to
the invert of existing low flow drain (as illustrated in Figure 3-6). Lowering of the
creek commences approximately 30 upstream from Myrtle Street Bridge and
concludes approximately 20m downstream of Short Street Bridge.
• Adopt levees on embankments either side of Bendigo Creek between Myrtle Street
Bridge and Short Street Bridge with average height (including freeboard) of 219.7
mAHD for both levees.
• Approximate Cost: $1, 575, 204

Impacts in the 1% AEP Flood Event This option increases the conveyance underneath Myrtle Street Bridge and Short Street Bridge
as well as increasing the creek capacity where the modifications have been applied whilst
preventing flows from breaking out of the creek with the adoption of levees on both
embankments.

Four properties previously at risk in the 1% AEP event are now flood free. 78 properties have
significantly reduced flood depths. Some increased flood depth was observed upstream of
Myrtle Street Bridge with nine properties impacted adversely. It is anticipated that this
increase can be resolved with further increased capacity in Bendigo Creek further upstream
of Myrtle Street Bridge.

Impacts in the 10% AEP Flood Event No significant benefits or adverse impacts in the 10% AEP flood event.

Levees (Average Height = 219.7 mAHD)

Increased Creek Capacity

Figure 3-9 Location of Mitigation Option D5

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 12

3.6 OPTION D6 – BENDIGO CREEK INCREASED CHANNEL CAPACITY

Mitigation Option ID D6

Option Details Option D6 is illustrated in Figure 3-10 Figure 3-6 and includes the following:
• Increased capacity of Bendigo Creek by lowering eastern side of creek to invert of
existing low flow drain (as illustrated in Figure 3-6) commencing at the most
southern model extent on Bendigo Creek and concluding 30m upstream of the
confluence of Bendigo Creek and Back Creek.
• Approximate Cost: $ 2, 945, 345

Impacts in the 1% AEP Flood Event This option increases the volumetric capacity of Bendigo Creek by lowering of the creek bed
on one side.

202 at risk properties with significantly reduced flood depths in the 1% AEP event.
Significant increases in flood depths can be observed around Charing Cross and the corner
of Bayne Street and Lucan Street (adjacent to confluence of Bendigo Creek and Back Creek).
It is anticipated that this slight increase adjacent to the confluence of Bendigo Creek and
Back Creek can be resolved the detailed design process. The increases in flood heights
centred around Charing Cross are significant, caused by the constriction of the creek in the
channel underneath High Street.

202 at risk properties with significantly reduced flood depths in the 1% AEP event. Several

Some adverse impacts are observed at 16 properties on Bayne Street and Lucan Street
(adjacent to confluence of Bendigo Creek and Back Creek) as well as adjacent to the High
Street underpass with flood depths increased marginally. It is anticipated that this slight
increase can be resolved by increasing the volumetric capacity of Bendigo Creek at Bayne
Street Bridge and High Street.

Impacts in the 10% AEP Flood Event No significant benefits or adverse impacts in the 10% AEP flood event.

Increased Creek Capacity

Figure 3-10 Location of Mitigation Option D6

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 3 Detailed Mitigation Options Assessment Page 13

4 SENSITIVITY TESTING
A number of options or scenarios were suggested for modelling which aren’t true structural mitigation options but nonetheless add
considerable value to the study in terms of understanding flood behaviour and future impacts related to increased development and
climate change. The following options have been classed as options for sensitivity modelling and are currently being modelled. The
options/assessments are:

• A climate change sensitivity analysis is currently being undertaken. This involved increasing design rainfall intensity based on
recommendations in relevant guidelines. Both the 1% AEP and 20% AEP events are currently being modelled.

The results of the above scenario will be made available in coming weeks towards the conclusion of the study.

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 4 Sensitivity Testing Page 14

5 SUMMARY
This report has presented the results detailed modelling of six mitigation options (or combinations of options) aimed at reducing
flood risk through Central Bendigo. Feedback on these options will now be sought from the community and other stakeholders.

These results will be further discussed at an upcoming community workshop to be held from 5:30pm-7:30pm on Thursday 16th
November at the Bendigo Bank Theatre, 50 View St, Bendigo.

More information regarding the study and upcoming workshop can be found at https://www.bendigo.vic.gov.au/Services/Roads-
and-Drainage/Stormwater-and-drainage/Bendigo-central-flood-mitigation-study.

Detailed Mitigation Summary Report | 5 Summary Page 15

APPENDIX A
FLOOD MAPS
LEGEND
1% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D1 - Back Creek (North of

1:1595 @ A3 McIvor Road), Drainage
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55
Job No: 30105 Upgrades
Date: 27/10/2021
1% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
LEGEND
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D1 - Back Creek (North of

1:1595 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55
McIvor Road), Drainage
Job No: 30105 Upgrades
Date: 27/10/2021
10% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
LEGEND
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D2 - Back Creek (South of

1:695 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55
McIvor Road), Drainage
Job No: 30105 Upgrades
Date: 09/11/2021
1% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
LEGEND
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D2 - Back Creek (South of

1:695 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55
McIvor Road), Drainage
Job No: 30105 Upgrades
Date: 09/11/2021
10% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
LEGEND
1% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D3 - Back Creek (Increased

1:3475 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Channel Capacity)
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021 1% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
LEGEND
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D3 - Back Creek (Increased

1:2722 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Channel Capacity)
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021 10% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
Model Extent
1% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D4 - Increased Bridge
1:3223 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Conveyance
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021
1% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
Model Extent
1% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D4 - Increased Bridge
1:4581 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Conveyance
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021
1% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
Model Extent
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D4 - Increased Bridge
1:3223 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Conveyance
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021 10% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
Model Extent
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D4 - Increased Bridge
1:4581 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Conveyance
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021 10% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
1% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D5 - Bendigo Creek (Between Myrtle Street

1:2696 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55
and Short Street), Increased Creek
Job No: 30105 Capacity
Date: 27/10/2021
1% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D5 - Bendigo Creek (Between Myrtle Street

1:2329 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55
and Short Street), Increased Creek
Job No: 30105 Capacity
Date: 27/10/2021
10% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
Model Extent
1% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D6 - Bendigo Creek Increased

1:4905 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Channel Capacity
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021 1% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
Model Extent
1% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D6 - Bendigo Creek Increased

1:4905 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Channel Capacity
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021 1% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
Model Extent
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D6 - Bendigo Creek Increased

1:4905 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Channel Capacity
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021 10% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)
 LEGEND
Model Extent
10% AEP Afflux (m)
<= -0.5
-0.5 - -0.4
-0.4 - -0.2
-0.2 - -0.1
-0.1 - -0.05
-0.05 - -0.035
-0.035 - -0.01
-0.01 - 0.01
0.02 - 0.035
0.035 - 0.05
0.05 - 0.1
0.1 - 0.2
0.2 - 0.4
0.4 - 0.5
> 0.5
Was Wet Now Dry
Was Dry Now Wet

D6 - Bendigo Creek Increased

1:4905 @ A3
GDA 2020 / MGA Zone 55 Channel Capacity
Job No: 30105
Date: 27/10/2021 10% AEP Afflux (Change in Flood Level)