Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/272740993
CITATIONS READS
0 1,675
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Dr. D R Prajapati on 24 February 2015.
ABSTRACT
This paper is an effort to improve the productivity of various assembly line of the tractor industry by using the
concepts of motion and time study. Taylor, Frank and Lillian Gilbreth suggested to find the optimum and most
efficient way of using the available resources which include material, machinery, men and money. The case study is
carried out in an assembly line of a tractor industry where various operations are carried out on more than fourteen
work stations. This industry is manufacturing more than 50 engines per day in the range of 20 HP to 50 HP engines.
From the case study, it is observed that the productivity of the assembly line of tractors can be improved up to 108%
after implementing the work study.
and work efficiency. The main bottleneck points are in Bibliographic research is used in order to construct the
the sorting and packaging stages that take about 60 % - theoretical framework and the intervention instrument
80 % of the total time invested in the production adopted is the multicriteria decision aiding
process. The objectives of the present study were to methodology– constructivist (MCDA-C).
improve work methods of wax flower farms, to increase Abdul Razak et al. [1] introduced a model for
productivity and quality and to develop an optimal measuring individual performance named Workforce
branch cutting methodology in order to maximize the Competency Model (WFCM). The model was
total revenue. developed by referring to the previously developed
Ramanathan [7] assessed the performance of models in literature, which are concerned with the
55 banks operating in countries of the GCC in his study, measurement of human or individual performance. The
using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Malmquist organization's needs for each of the workers have been
productivity index (MPI). When DEA is used, the evaluated on identified indicators. A case study was
bank(s) that registered the highest efficiency is used as carried out in an electronic packaging company for
benchmark and the performance of other banks are verification and validation purpose demonstrates the
evaluated relative to this benchmark. Two outputs and developed model is efficient, accurate, flexible and
four inputs are employed for the performance feasible.
measurement. MPI is used to analyze the patterns of Ahmed et al. [2] developed a model for any
efficiency change over the period 2000‐2004. DEA kind of organization where performance evaluation is
efficiencies are calculated for the year 2004. His results significantly important for staff motivation, attitude and
showed that only 15 of the 55 banks are rated as behavior development, communicating and aligning
efficient under constant returns to scale (CRS) individual and organizational aims, and fostering
assumption, and all the GCC countries have at least one positive relationships between management and staff.
efficient bank. Fuzzy control is used to determine the overall
Hinton and Barnes [4] identified the features of performance index by combining results of the
an effective e-business performance measurement performance in selected criteria and provided it in
system, as well as the practices in organisations with numerical values which will undoubtedly ensure
distinctive e-business performance metrics. From this it convenience of the concerned human resource personnel
was hoped to identify a set of best practice during performance rating calculation. It is found that
recommendations. A case study methodology was used managers encounter many decisions that require the
to examine the performance measurement practices of simultaneous use of different types of data in their
12 potentially exemplar organisations that have made decision-making process.
efforts to develop distinctive performance metrics for e- Bechar and Eben-Chaime [3] developed an
business. Qualitative data are collected from interviews advanced system for work study on a hand-held
with key informants from each organisation, with computer (HHC) platform for horticultural work
supporting data generate from company documents. The measurement and for this they was conducted an
study has uncovered a variety of approaches to e- experimental study. Their methodology consists of
business performance measurement, with no common characteristics of the system platform including
framework apparent. hardware, interface and software, development of a
Rogerio et al. [8] developed a methodology dedicated measuring software, a controlled experiment
and a framework to assess performance measurement in agricultural environment and a statistical analysis.
and generate a better understanding of the project Their study showed that a single surveyor who uses
context. They presented an application to illustrate the traditional tools is subject to measurement errors, which
proposed methodology, to identify and measure the can be reduced only with the assistance of a second
success parameters for a project. Their research method surveyor. The study further shows that the HHC
is a mixture of qualitative and quantitative and it is platform enables to avoid this second surveyor – a
applied to a case study. The primary data were gathered single surveyor who uses traditional tools.
using unstructured interviews with decision makers.
HHC platform performs as accurate as two surveyors Indian tractor Industry took birth in 1959-60 when the
who use traditional tools. first tractor manufacturing unit was established.
However, this industry found a firm footing only after
3. Introduction of the Industry the turbulent period of 1968-74, during which the
acceleration which should have emerged from the
upsurge in demand generated by the Green Revolution
was navigated by large-scale imports of fully built
tractors. By 1973-74 when imports were banned, 22 8. Torque marking on all bolts.
manufacturers remained. It is in an environment of 9. Piston selection with depth gauge.
intense competition between 22 manufacturers that our 10. Oil cooler assembly fitment on loose block and
tractor industry has grown during the last 30 years. inspection of movement of cover timing with
During this period, it has become not only a major block.
segment of our engineering industry but with a 11. Spindle idle gear hole matching (2.3 kgm).
population of 1, 30,000 tractors in 1990, our country 12. Case timing on block with gasket and torque 2.3
became the second largest tractor producer in the world. kgm.
In 1970, Punjab government took up the
challenge of setting up this industry on the indigenous STATION NO 2A
design. It was established on June 27, 1970 and was
promoted by Punjab Govt. through Punjab State 1. Assembly of oil ring with all three rings on hot
Industrial Development Corporation with the support of piston.
Government of India and public financial institutions. 2. Top marking on ring.
Its engine division was established in technical and 3. Connecting rod Marking (OK).
financial collaboration with Kirloskar oil engines Ltd. 4. Assembly of connecting rod with piston.
and started production from 28 Dec., 1988. This plant 5. Locking of pins on both sides of piston.
produces engines in the range of 20 HP to 50 HP. It is 6. Connecting rod caps cleaning and placement.
producing 50 engines on average daily. 7. Bearing assembly and checking of dent mark.
8. Case timing of sub assembly.
3.1 Manufacturing Processes
STATION NO 3
Various work stations & operations in industry are listed
below: Ring groove setting & oiling.
1. Attachment of piston assembly on crank shaft.
STATION NO. 1 2. Tightening 8.2-9.0 kgm. “CONROD”.
3. Checking of end play in connecting rod.
1. Cleaning of engine component completely. 4. Free movement checking of crankshaft with piston.
2. Punching of engine number. 5. Gasket selection operation.
3. Cleaning of engine with air and cloth 6. All gear fitment & timing mark matching.
4. Oil jet mfg. And T (1.20-1.80) kgm. 7. Position of waver washer and marking (OK).
5. Liner fitment matching to bore marks and oiling. 8. FIP gasket setting & attachment.
6. Topping of liner 0.9 mm. 9. Cam gear bolt T (6.4-9.6) kgm with thrust washer.
7. Tappets attachment operation.
8. Attachment of stud on cylindrical blocks (3 STATION NO. 4
Nos.).
9. Attachment of cam with shaft. 1. Pressing of oil seal.
10. Thrust plate fitment with sealant. 2. Cover timing fitment & torque (2.3) kgm.
11. Inspection of free movement of cam shaft. 3. Water pumps gasket& assembly with torque (2.3)
kgm.
STATION NO. 2 4. Rear oil seal fitment and assembly with torque
(2.3) kgm.
1. Crankshaft cleaning with cloth. 5. Oil pump fitment bolts torque 3.8-5.3kgm.
2. Bearing selection crankshaft. 6. Oil pipe in with „O‟ ring.
3. Crankshaft assembly with thrust washer. 7. Bracket strainer pipe fitment & T2.3 kgm.
4. Oil application on bearing caps. 8. Tightening and torque of oil pipe strainer & oil
5. Main bearing cap bolt ( T10 – 10.7 kgm) pipe with gasket.
6. Crank gear fitment with keys.
7. Free movement of crankshaft and end play.
1. Placement of gasket on sides, setting & sealant
application.
STATION NO. 5
2. Attachment of FR/RR ½ seal with sealant. 3. Oil pan up fitment & torque (1.7 – 2.6 kgm).
4. Placement of lower pan with gaskets. 2. Assembly of nozzle holder & torque.
5. Tightening order & torque marking (1.7-2.6 3. Assembly of return pipes & clipping.
kgm). 4. Assembly of oil pipe & torque (810).
5. Fuel filters assembly.
6. Assembly of fuel pipe & torque.
STATION NO. 6
STATION NO. 10
1. End plate bolt torquing (3.8-5.3 KGM).
2. Marking of pin fitment. 1. Engine mounting bracket & torque.
3. Flywheel bolting with oil & torque (21 – 23) 2. Bracket alternator & torque.
&kgm. 3. Water pumps pulley inspection.
4. Cover assembly and clutch assembly with 4. Cooling fan tightening T (2.5 kgm).
centring tool. 5. Belt fitment.
5. Tightening assembly & torque mark 2.6.
STATION NO. 11
STATION NO. 7
1. Assembling heather with gasket.
1. Matching of indicator pin with T.D.C. 2. Tightening & torque 2.3 kgm.
2. Piston topping & mark setting. 3. Attachment of oil gauge pipe with dipstick.
3. Gasket selection & assembly of push rod. 4. Sub assembly of head cover with sealant.
4. Location of cylinder head bolt after dipping in 5. Attachment of cylinder head cover.
oil. 5. Attachment of hpp and tightening attachment of
5. Crank pulley fitment & torque. stud manifold (M-5).
6. S.O.B.P. pipe fitment & torque.
6. Movement of empty trolley.
STATION NO. 7 A
STATION NO. 12
1. Cylinder head studs fitment & tightening (all) 12
1. Breather of exhaust manifold gasket & torque.
nos.
2. SOBP filter fitment and torquing.
2. Sub assembly of inlet manifold with gasket &
3. Attachment of mtg. Bracket & torquing.
torque.
4. Blank paint on machined surface.
3. Case assembly-Thermo with gasket and torque.
5. Torque marking on all bolts
4. Thermostat fitment.
6. Sub assembly of mounting. Bracket & fitment.
5. Engine hanger (rear & front).
7. Attachment of both hose alternator.
6. Fitment of exhaust manifold gasket & torque 2.3
kgm.
7. Fitment of compressor for AC vehicle. 3.2 Layout of Engine Assembly Plant
The layout of engine assembly plant; showing
STATION NO. 8 various work stations is presented in Figure 1.
1. Cylinder head bolt tightening order torque (6
kgm) & torquing of rocker arm nut (1.3 – 1.7 S1 = Station 1, S2 = Station 2, S2a = Station 2a,
kgm). S3 = Station 3,
2. Marking & rotation to 90 degree + 90 degree. S4 = Station 4, S 5 = Station 5, S 6 = Station 6,
3. Inspection of movements of rocker bracket. S7 = Station 7,
4. Tappet clearance setting. S7a = Station 7a, S 8 = Station 8, S 9 = Station 9,
S10 = Station 10, S 11 = Station 11
S 12 = Station 12
STATION NO. 9
3.3 Analysis of Assembly Line Through Total allowances= (variable + constant + standing +
Time Study contingency) allowances
= {(1 +2) + (2+2) + 2 + 2}
= 12 %
As plant was visited at engine assembly plant located at No of stations = 12
Ropar. At this plant different models of engine are Company target = 40 engines /eight hours shift
assembled at various stations with different operations. Average normal time obtained from different operators
At every station there is one worker in each station and working on different stations for assembling one engine
one worker is allotted to every two stations for helping = 10 min
to the main workers. The engines are transported to one Standard time = Normal time + % allowance of normal
station to another with the help of manual trolley. And time
operations are done with the help of inspection ranches, = 10 + 10 * 11/100
pneumatic guns etc. = 11.1 min.
There are 12 stations operations are in engine Number of engines produced in 8 hours = 480/11.1 =
assembly process shop. 43.2 engines
Following allowances are taken in engine assembly % improvement in productivity in 1 machine =
operation. 43*100/40 = 108 %
Engine produced per shift (8 hours) =
1) Variable allowance 43 engines / shift
a) Awkward bending – 1 % of normal time Engine produced two shift (16 hours) =
b) Use of force/muscular energy – 2% of normal time 86 engines / two shifts
2) Constant allowances Engine produced per day three shifts (24 hours) =
a) Personal allowance – 2% of normal time 132 engines / per day
b) Basic fatigue allowance – 2% of normal time While target set by company per day =
3) Standing allowance – 2 % of normal time 120 engines
4) Contingency allowance – 2% of normal time So, 12 more engines will be produced per day in 24
hours.