Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ssco
Ssco
Ssco
If choice of treatment for CKD is based on the patient’s own circumstances (Morton et al.,
2012), CAPD has distinct positive advantages over haemodialysis. As suggested by the
name continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, the dialysis takes place whilst the patient
carries on with their daily lives and does not necessitate them visiting a hospital on a
regular basis. Even though CAPD can be performed in the home and sometimes in the
workplace, dialysis exchanges have to be carried out four or five times every day, making
travelling and socialising problematic (Mean, 2014). Patients may also find the catheter
very invasive and can be self-conscious of its placement (Prakash et al., 2013).
to a dialysis machine for four hours three times a week. Once the time of travelling to and
from the renal unit is added to the treatment time, patients are away from home the best
51
part of three full days per week (Diamant et al., 2010). However, satellite HD units provide
patients with dialysis facilities nearer their homes to reduce travelling times, and recently
there has been a drive to encourage more haemodialysis to be performed at home (Walker
et al., 2014). Patients on haemodialysis can often experience quite alarming events
including hypotensive episodes and painful cramps (Kistler et al., 2014). A strict diet is
also advised for haemodialysis patients which may result in patients having to prepare
different meals from their families from themselves (Untas et al., 2012). As represented in
Figure 1.4 the arrow between treatment and dialysis access is bi-directional due to patients
1.7.5.3 Transplantation
also classed as another form of renal replacement therapy. However, compared to other
RRTs, transplantation is seen as the best treatment for CKD (Weir and Lerma, 2014) for
reasons of cost effectiveness (Kerr et al., 2012) and patient outcomes (Tonelli et al., 2011).
When receiving a successful kidney transplant the patient can return to a relatively normal
life (Rambod et al., 2011). Patients receiving a transplant have also reported superior
HRQoL in many studies (Tonelli et al., 2011). However, transplantation is not a panacea
with chronic rejection being a possibility and severe side effects from immunosuppression
drugs e.g. skin cancer (Kuschal et al., 2012), increased risk of infection (Fishman and Issa,
When CKD patients are making decisions regarding the different treatment options, they
may choose not to dialyse and as an alternative prefer to be treated by diet and medication
alone. More elderly CKD patients elect to follow this pathway as an alternative to spending
the last years or months of their lives on dialysis. In such patients, the prospects of
rehabilitation are remote and also prognosis is poor (Smith et al., 2003, Chandna et al.,
2011), therefore more emphasis is placed on the quality of life and symptom control than
prolonging life (Chandna et al., 2011). Symptom control can be achieved by controlling
52
erythropoietin EPO (Smith et al., 2003). Rather than the patient withdrawing from
promotes a good level of quality of life and a planned package for end of life care. Studies
have reported that elderly patients receiving CM who have several comorbidities do not
suffer from a significant survival disadvantage to those who are on dialysis (Smith et al.,
1.7.6 Complications
Although the diagram in Figure 1.4 tracks the stages of a CKD patient’s pathway through
their illness, it does not include complications that they may experience along the way.
Complications may occur at any time along the trajectory including cardiovascular events,
infection episodes, and problems with fluid overload and dialysis access (Murtagh et al.,
2008). Complications can also arise from co-morbid conditions that patients may have in
conjunction with CKD, such as diabetes. Acute episodes may increase with age and could
1.7.7 Death
Sudden death can happen at any stage of the illness trajectory without any prior diagnosis
or warning (Murtagh et al., 2008). Cardiovascular events are the most common causes of
sudden death in CKD (Shamseddin and Parfrey, 2011). Patients who choose not to dialyse
or withdraw from dialysis have a much shorter decline in the illness trajectory (Murtagh et
al., 2008) but may have planned to die in their home environment surrounded by their
family. As the CKD population increases in age, we need to further understand the final
stages in their illness trajectory so that provision can be made for patients to die with a
comprehensive end of life package in place ensuring a dignified and pain free death
1.8 Summary
This chapter has described and discussed the condition of CKD, its prevalence and
53
CKD is an important health problem which is growing worldwide. There is no cure for
CKD and its treatments at end stage are invasive and time consuming. The burden of
medication is also high and restriction of diet and fluids is also very limiting for patients
As this chapter only addresses the clinical management of CKD, future chapters will
discuss the psychosocial and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients suffering