Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CSTP Element(s) Focus for POP Cycle (In semesters 2, 3, 4, copy pertinent elements from ILP for POP Cycle focus.)
1 - Emerging 2 - Exploring 3 - Applying 4 - Integrating 5 – Innovating
NT pedagogical skills are newly formed and Skills are developing as NT investigates Skills are applied as NT makes Skills are refined as NT combines elements Skills are polished as NT expands ability to
just coming into prominence and examines pedagogical practices increased relevant and suitable use into a cohesive and unified pedagogical add new methods and strategies into
of pedagogical choices repertoire pedagogical repertoire
CSTP Element Initial Rating Rating Description (Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2.)
T – I will survey the student for what type of notes they
personally prefer to get a better sense of my students
favorite learning tool.
Using knowledge of students’
academic readiness, language S – Students will feel validated that I value what type of
4.1 proficiency, cultural S notes they like and want to take that into account in my
background, and individual teachings.
development to plan instruction.
T – I will continue to commit to get my students’ personal
opinions and the recourses/tools that benefit them.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 1 of 5
S – Understanding that learning is a partnership between
their teacher and them each personally. This will also build
trust and stronger teacher-student relationship.
T – I currently use a range of note taking methods in my 7th
grade history course. I am also considering introducing a
flipped classroom model.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 5
told students what groups they
were working in and then told
students to start their quiz. I think
this was a great change. Students
could start working on the activity
as soon as they finish their own
individual quiz, rather than having
to wait for everyone to finish. Great
use of time!
The student were definitely
CSTP 1: Engaging All learning a lot in this lesson. The
After reflecting on the lesson, I am
Students In Kaila’s class students were motivating factor was that Kaila let
• In what ways were students very happy that I added the guiding
engaged? How were engaged the full class. There were of them work in groups that they were
questions. I was very easy to walk
students not engaged? course students who got distracted already friendly with; however, it
• How did students contribute around and guide students’
to their learning? for moments at a time. Kaila’s was clearly stated that any misuse
• How did teacher and/or notetaking once I had set up the
constant circulation helped clear up of these groups would result in a
students monitor learning?
parameters, I wanted them to focus
• How were the focus any questions and also keep reassignment. This gave students
students engaged and on. Not only for this lesson but also
supported throughout the learners on task. the responsibility to have fun but
lesson? future assessments.
also learn or they would lose the
privilege.
After reflecting, a struggle that
Students were held accountable for remains is to always ensure equal
the work they completed in class. group work support. Meaning all
They had to fill in a sectioned off members work equally hard to
CSTP 2: Effective Learning Kaila set up great guiding questions
Environment note-taking guide. Here they had to produce the final product. This is
• How did students and that ensured the learning targets
showcase what they learned in an someone accomplished by each
teacher contribute to an were hit as well as guide struggling
effective learning organized fashion. This not only had student having their own set of
environment? learners to success.
to be turned in for a grade but then notes to fill in. Even if some students
can be later used to study for do more copying than other
assessments. students, the rewriting process still
supports overall learning.
As Kaila went around the room
CSTP 3: Organizing spending different amounts of time
For the most part, the directions
Subject Matter with each group. This continuous
• What actions of the NT and lesson was very straight
contributed to student flow allowed for any misconceptions I have done several group work type
forward and it was clear Kaila has
assimilation of subject to be cleared up within a few lessons like this so students were
matter? great classroom management.
• How did students construct minutes. Some groups that Kaila familiar with the process which
knowledge of subject Students asked questions freely and
spent more time supporting clearly always make the learning easier and
matter?
were open to accepting support
• What misconceptions did benefited from her support. After flow better.
students have and how and feedback throughout the
were they addressed by clarifications were made students
the teacher? lesson.
jumped straight into the
assignment.
As I observed the classroom
students were very engaged with
This series of lesson had great In my classes, I did not have a
the content and learning was
differentiation in the types of lesson student who needed this type of
CSTP 4: Learning clearly happening. Group work
Experiences delivery and note taking style. differentiation, but if I did, I could
gives students the space to
• How were students Student who prefer or learn better also provide a student with
supported through communicate what is being
differentiated instruction? from one type are not expected to condensed noted from the reading
• How did students discussed in the text and also find a
always learn that way. Student are and they could then use these notes
participate?
way to summarize the ideas and
• How did the NT contribute supported with their strengthens as to then support and guide them as
to student learning? record them on paper in their own
well as challenged with the areas of they take notes for themselves on
words. Each of these pieces support
need. the handout.
different typed of learners
throughout the lesson.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 5
There were not any students who
did not work hard to complete this
Kaila created an online submission assignment during this first part of
CSTP 5: Assessing Student
for this assignment to be uploaded. class time. Student will now be In my reflection, I would next time
Learning From here she can assess how well given the following class period to re-ask groups some of the guiding
• How did students
demonstrate achievement
each group and individual student finish taking their notes as a team. I questions that I can see they already
of lesson objectives? was able to process and take notes am looking forward to reviewing answered. This would give me more
• In what ways did students
struggle or demonstrate on this reading. She will also have the assessment with Kaila to in the moment feedback as to
•
limited understanding?
What teacher actions
the follow up assessment from this determine the level of whether or not they are being able
contributed to student lesson to also determine how well understanding from this lesson. to read and comprehend the content
achievement?
students understood and processed From my personal in class in groups as they work.
the learning targets. observation, learning was definitely
occurring and students were
engaged in the content.
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
After reviewing the assessment results the average was a 79. Since this was a pop quiz, meaning students did
To what degree did students
achieve lesson objectives? not know, nor study for the quiz, I believe these are results that suggest learning was done within these
groups.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
AG was predicted to volunteer ZZ surprised me with her
much more in the small group performance after both types of
As predicted SN did perform well
setting rather than the whole lesson. I felt that she might have
on day 3 and the quiz on day 4. He
group setting. This held true. What performed the same on both.
To what degree did focus is a more social learner and he was
students achieve lesson happened that I did not predicted However, it was clear she learned
objectives? able to make deeper connections
is that AG preformed equally well much better in the whole group
with the content in comparison to
on both assessments. Overall, she setting. She did get distracted
the whole group note taking
is clearly more comfortable in a often from her peers and was
session.
small group where she has at least focused on the social piece of the
one buddy. lesson than the content.
What would you do differently Next time I would support student with providing an example of what good notes from the text look like.
next time? Austen suggested this and it was a wonderful idea that I plan to add into my future lessons.
1. Provided guiding questions
What were three top Lesson 2. Pop quiz to ensure true results
Strengths? 3. Selective group placement where they were with at least one buddy, but one that I felt would not
become a problem
1. Provide examples
What were three top areas for
improvement? 2. As student the guiding questions as I circulated the room
3. Assign group leader to guide the groups
Next steps are to develop a summative assessment and compare those results to the ones found in these
What are next steps?
quizzes.
Other Comments/Notes
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 5