Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE 1.
TEA TEA MEA DEA
MEA DEA DIHEP* ether conversion selectivity selectivity
Example % by wt.% by wt.% by wt.% by wt. % mol % mol %
C1 O.54 1.69 O.OO O.74 10.3 12.6 23.2
1. 6.08 20.86 0.87 1.21 84.7 17.5 35.O
2 12.56 1069 3.67 O.67 95.7 21.1 19.7
*N,N'-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine
**O-(2-hydroxyethyl)triethanolamine
NaOH, KOH, CsCH, Ba(OH), Ca(OH), sodium Compared with the comparative example, it is clear that
methoxide, Sodium ethoxide, potassium t-butoxide and lan in the presence of NaOH or KOH the lower ethanolamines
thanum oxide. The bases can be used as Solid or as aqueous 55
MEA and DEA are obtained with considerably increased
or alcoholic Solution. Particularly preferred Strong bases are conversions and with at least comparable Selectivity.
NaOH and KOH. Reaction of TEA and MEA
The ethanolamine(s) (II) can be present dissolved or General procedure
dispersed in an inert Solvent. Suitable Solvents are alcohols, Unless stated otherwise, 20g of TEA (0.13 mol) and 10
Such as methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, g of MEA (0.16 mol) are premixed with 2 g of the given
2-ethylhexanol, ethers, Such as tetrahydrofuran and 1,4- 60 Strongly basic compound in a 50 ml stirred autoclave and
dioxane, aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons or mixtures Stirred at the given temperature for the given time. A Sample
thereof, Such as pentane, hexane, heptane, petroleum ether, is then taken from the reactor Space, cooled, derivatized with
benzene, toluene, Xylene, Mihagol and water. trifluoroacetic anhydride and quantitatively analyzed by gas
The proceSS according to the invention is generally car chromatography against diethylene glycol dimethyl ether as
ried out at temperatures above 180° C., preferably at 180 to 65 internal Standard.
270° C., particularly preferably at 190 to 260° C., and in In the examples below, deviations from the general pro
particular at 200 to 250 C. in customary reaction cedure were made.
US 6,469,214 B2
S 6
Comparative Example C2 the conversion proceeds not only from higher ethanola
The MEA/TEA mixture is heated without the addition of mines to lower ethanolamines, but also vice versa
a basic compound. (Examples 3 and 4).
We claim:
Example 3 5 1. A process for the preparation of one or more ethano
lamines (I), chosen from the group consisting of
30g of TEA are heated with 2 g of KOH. monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine, by
conversion of one or more ethanolamines (II) different from
Example 4 the ethanolamine(s) (I), chosen from the group consisting of
30g of MEA are heated with 2 g of KOH. 9 monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, O.N.
N-tris (2-hydroxyethyl) ethanolamine, N-(2-aminoethyl)
Example 13 ethanolamine, N-(2-hydroxvethyl)piperazine N-(2-
hydroxyethyl) morpholine and N,N'-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)
24 g of TEA and 6 g of MEA are heated with 2.4 g of piperazine, where the ethanolamine(s) (II), optionally in the
KOH. presence of ammonia, is/are treated with a strong base.
2. A proceSS as claimed in claim 1 for the preparation of
Example 19 diethanolamine, where monoethanolamine is treated.
The MEA/TEA mixture is heated with 2 g of NaOH 3. A process S claimed in claim 1 for the preparation of
dissolved in 2 g of water. diethanolamine, where triethanolamine is treated.
20 4. A process as claimed in claim 1 for the preparation of
Example 20 diethanolamine, where a mixture comprising monoethano
lamine and triethanolamine is treated.
The MEATEA mixture is heated with 2 g of NAOH 5. A proceSS as claimed in claim 1 for the preparation of
dissolved in 5g of ethanol. diethanolamine and optionally monoethanolamine, where a
The results of the experiments are given in Table 2. mixture comprising triethanolamine and ammonia is treated.
TABLE 2
TEA TEA MEA
Time Temp. MEA DEA TEA AEEA*** DIHEP* ether:** conversion conversion
Example Basic catalyst h C. 96 by wt. 76 by wt. 76 by wt. 96 by wt. 76 by wt. 96 by wt. % %
C2 - 24 2OO 26.9 O6 65.9 O.7 O.O O.3 1.2 19.2
3 KOH 2 250 O1 4.5 65.5 O.O 0.5 1.5 34.5
4 KOH 1.8 250 29.4 7.2 O.2 5.8 O.O O.9 60.6
5 KOH 2O 2OO 19.4 7.7 51.1 2.1 0.4 O.3 23.4 41.7
6 NaOMe 2O 2OO 20.1 2.4 48.7 2.1 O.2 O.3 27.0 39.6
7 KOH 2O 250 0.4 1.9 6.4 1.2 6.2 O.2 90.4 98.8
8 KOH 6 250 3.1 17.1 15.4 2.8 4.3 O.8 76.9 90.7
9 KOH 2 250 6.5 2O2 31.3 2.4 2.4 1.3 53.1 80.5
1O KOH 22.5 220 6.8 15.8 33.9 3.8 3.8 1.O 49.2 79.6
11 NaOH 1.3 250 9.6 22.7 32.2 2.2 2.O 18 51.7 71.2
12 LOH 7 250 7.6 19.9 28.7 5.2 6.9 1.5 57.0 77.2
13 KOH 3 250 3.3 21.9 32.4 1.5 3.2 1.O 83.5 59.5
14 Ca(OH), 24 250 9.8 8.3 37.4 4.3 2.9 0.5 43.9 70.6
15 CSOH 5 250 8.6 13.4 38.1 4.0 2.7 1.O 42.9 74.2
16 KOtBu 6.3 250 7.9 13.9 29.9 4.2 2.8 1.1 55.2 76.3
17 Ba(OH), 22 250 13.3 8.6 40.8 4.9 2.6 O.7 38.8 60.1
18 La2O3 22 250 16.3 6.9 41.2 3.6 1.9 O.7 38.2 51.1
19 NaOMe 6.5 250 11.6 10.9 36.7 3.8 2.8 O.8 45.O 65.2
2O NaOEt 6.4 2SO 18.4 4.1 47.9 2.9 1.3 O6 28.2 44.7
21 NaOH + HO 1.5 250 12.5 2O.9 26.6 2.1 1.9 1.5 60.1 62.5
22 NaOH - EtOH 1.4 2SO 7.4 22.5 25.0 1.7 2.2 1.6 62.5 77.8
*N,N'-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine
**O-(2-hydroxyethyl)triethanolamine
***N-(2-aminoethyl)ethanolamine
It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent is
hereby corrected as shown below:
Title page,
Item 57, ABSTRACT,
Line 4, “from the ethanolamine' should be -- from the ethanolamine(s) --.
Line 5, delete "(s)";
Line 8, “hydroxy ethyl” should be -- hydroxyethyl --.
Column 6
Line 12, “hydroxvethyl” should be -- hydroxyethyl --.
Line 55, “base. an’ Should be -- base, an --.
JAMES E ROGAN
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office