| the Attacking Player 00 A ADODALLESIS237 This book is a state-otthe-a , renee recess in recent years many of the world’s top your )ypraye.s,-.ach as Kramnik, Anand and Shirov have invested enormous amounls of ime and analysis into making lines of he Slav, Semi Slav, and QC into pons for Black. This book concentrates on the provides a selection of aggressive repertoires Gefences, including the Orlhodox, Tarrasch and SemiTarrasch: No player who has read this book need be in any doubt how te meet Black's sharp opproaches- be they modem, dynamic counterattacks or old, romantic gambits Graham Burgess is Botsford's Chess Editor. He ison experienced international player, with numerous tournament victories to his ced, ‘whose previous books have been highly acclaimed in the chess press. In May 1994 he set o new World Record for marathon blitz chess playing International Master Steffen Pedersen is one of the very few teenagers to have scored a Grandmester norm, and ranks os one of the greatest prospects in Danish chess, He respondent for Fyns Amis Avis, and his first book, I d4l, lished in 1993. The King’s Indian for Graham Burgess New Ideas in the Queen's Gembir Accepted L2uppeny ay 105 wqurey s,usand oy The Queen’s Gambit © for the | Attacking PlayerThe Queen’s Gambit for the Attacking Player Graham Burgess and Steffen Pedersen B, T. Batsford Ltd, LondonFirst published 1994 © Graham Burgess and Steffen Pedersen 1994 ISBN 07134 7385 1 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publicstion Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Al rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, by any means, without prior permission of the publisher. ‘Typeset by John Nunn and printed in Great Britain by Redwood Books, Trowbridge, Wilts for the publishers, B.T. Batsford Ltd, 4 Fitzhardinge Street, London WiH OAH. The back cover photographs appear courtesy af Borsholmeren (Burgess) and ‘Marin Randers (Pedersen) A BATSFORD CHESS BOOK Editorial Panel: Mark Doretsky, John Nunn, Jon Speelman General Adviser: Raymond Keene OBE Managing Editor: Graham Burgess Contents Bibliography Introduetion ‘Symbols, Section One: Orthodox Defences Exchange Variation versus 3...06 Exchange Vatiation versus 3...867 [Rubinstein Attack ‘Tartakower Defence Lasker Defence Dutch-Peruvian Gambit (Cambridge Springs Section Two: Slav and Semi-Slay 8 Slav: Introduction and 5 ad StS 9) Slav: 5 a6 without 5...S15 10. Slav: The trendy 4...a6 11 Gambits: Marshall and Abrahams 12 Semi-Stav: Repertoire with 5 2g5 13 Latvian Bayonet Attack Section Three: Queen's Gambit Accepted 14 QGA 3 4 e5: Gambit Play 15 QGA3e4 Qe6: Chigorin-style 16 QGA 3 45 and the Linares Variation 17 QGA 3.4 Oi6: Alekhine-style Section Four: Other defences 18, Vienna Variation 19 Ragozin Variation 20 Tasrasch Defence 21 Semi-Tarrasch 22 Unusual second moves for Black Index of Variations 9 2 39 52 56 59 B 3 90 99 ML 123 129 136 142 146 151 156 161 166 175Bibliography Books Wells, Complete Semi-Slav, Batsford 1994 lear, New Ideas in the Queen's Gambit Accepted, Batsford 1994 Markov and Schipkov, Winning With the Slav, Batsford 1994 ‘Ward, Opening Play, Batsford 1994 Dunnington, Pawn Power, Batsford 1994 Wells. Piece Power, Batslord 1994 Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings, Pedersen, 1.¢4!, John Rendboe 1993 Kondratiev, Slavianskaya Zashichita, Fizkultura i Sport 1985 Karpov (editor-in-chief), Secrets from Russia, Olbtich 1993 Polugaevsky, Queen's Gambit: Orthadox Defence, Batsford 1988 ‘Samarian, Queen's Gambit Declined, Batsford 1974 Konikowski and Thesing, Semi-Slay Defence: Borvinnik Variation, St Euitsice 1993 Pickard, ECO Busted, Hays 1993 Beliavsky and Mikhalchishin, D4, Sahovski Informator 1993, Den Broeder and Van der Vliet, Secord Amber, Magnana Mu 1993 Pachman, Das Damengambit, Olms 1993 _D, Sahovski Informator 1987 Periodicals ChessBase Magazine Europa Rochade Informator Skakbiadet ‘New in Chess Quick Service Nyt fra Sydesifyn ‘New in Chess Magazine Tidak far Schack ‘New in Chess Yearbook Norsk Sjaktblad Inside Chess aque Chess Life ‘Shakhmaty v SSSR British Chess Magazine Chess in the USSR Chess Monthly Shakhmainy Biulleten Dragon Biulleten Tsentralnovo Europe Echees Shabhmatnovo Kluba SSSR Introduction ‘The Purpose of this book. Our aim in this book is to equip the reader with sufficient weapons to play for a win with White after the moves I d4 d5 2 c4. The many branches of the Queen’s Gambit hhave developed hugo bodies of the- ory, with relatively few books de~ voted to them. Therefore our task hhas been rather a difficult one, and ‘we have had to be quite suthless with variations we do not consider to be up to the mark, ‘To summarise the authors’ gen- eral policy: 1) We have given at least two vi- able, ambitious systems against the most important and topical of Black's defences. Where this was not appropriate (either because the alternatives to the main system were too insipid, or demanded so much dotailed coverage — and we would not dream of sending our readers out to battle inadequately armed ~ as to ‘make the book t00 large) wo have striven 10 give plenty of choice side the main lines. 2) When a sensible defence for Black is out of fashion, we have given the reasons for this; ic. the line which presumably has been patting people off playing the posi tion with Black 3) Against unusual, generally ag- _wessive options for Black, we have provided a safe, convincing way for ‘White to proceed. 4) In all eases, we have been on the look-out for move order tricks: both how to avoid being ‘move- dered” out of the repertoire advo- cated here, and ways to manoeuvre Black onto unfamiliar territory. Those, at least, have been our sminimum aims. Naturally, we have aso given many extra ideas for White where these seem worthy of exploration, We have taken great care (o examine Black's resources in “iefuted’ lines, especially when the theory is based on games which arc rather old, or between obscure play- ‘The recent advances in the sirength of chess-playing software have had some impact on this book. Both authors have used Fritz2 on fast computers to help unravel some ‘of the positions arising in this book. ‘which are of a highly tactical nature. Silicon analysts are still ite crude in their positional assessments, but if pointed inthe right direction, can be avery useful tool© Introduction How the book found its authors How has it happened that one of the ‘co-authors of this book lives in Eng- land, and the other in Denmark? In carly 1993, 1 (GB) was tiving in ‘Svendborg (Denmark) and had been ‘commissioned by Batsford to write this book. When, in June 1993, Iwas asked by Batsford to take the job in London as their chess editor, T was left with a small problem regarding this book. I had already spent sev- cral months compiling, organizing ‘and critically reviewing material in ‘my database (the hard slog of writ- ing an openings book), so certainly did not want to abandon the project, ‘but clearly would hardly have the spare time to complete the book to my satisfaction in a sensible time framework. The obvious solution ‘was to bring in my club-mate, Stef- fen Pedersen, as a co-author. So, we exchanged databases, discussed ‘which lines to consider, and kept in touch. Broadly speaking, GB is re- sponsible for the sections on the Semi-Slav (without the Marshall Gambit), Queen's Gambit Accepted, Vienna, Ragozin, Tarrasch, Semi- Tarrasch and 2...2f5, while SP wrote the sections covering the Or- thodox Systems, the pure Slav, the rest of the second move deviations, and the Marshall Gambit, When the ‘word ‘Tis used, it refers to the prin- cipal author ofthe particular section, Naturally, there was plenty of di cussion about the critical positions in ll these lines (many of which we hhad worked on together during the previous two years), and GB, dou- bling as the editor of the book, was able to standardize stylistic matters throughout. Move orders All chess players have their own likes and dislikes, and so choose their move orders to avoid or allow certain possibilities. For instance, after | dé 26 2 ef 6, the move 3 is popular (o avoid a Nimzo- Indian), whereupon 3.-d5 leads into Queen's Gambit, in which White is committed to putting the Knight on 18, Thus we have considered all the lines relevant to this: in any case, this fits in well with our poliey of giving more than one viable option for White in the main lines. "There are just a fow requirements in order for this book to equip you with a complete repertoire with the Queen's Gambit: 1) You must play 1 d4, Of course ater 1 013 or I of, transpo- sitions very often occur into lines in this book, but ate by no means guar anteed 2) Alter 1 d4d5, you must play 2 4. We have not caiered for 2 23 (intending ¢4 on move three) against the Chigorin, Rausis line, of 2..e6 3 e4 dxed. This requirement is not much of a burden, since avoiding the Albin scems to us rather unneces- sary cowardice! 3) After 1 d4 16, you need to play 2 of to be certain of staying within the confines of this book against an opponent who intends a subsequent ...d5 (after 2...c6 or 2..06). Instead alter 2 O13 d5 3 04 ‘dxe4, lines of the QGA arise which are not discussed here. On an entirely different matter of move orders, in the opening phases Of the main games we have not al- ways stuck rigidly to the move or- ders in the actual games, but have in some cases adjusted reality in the interests of clarity. We feel the bene fits of this policy far outweigh the ‘danger of being misled about a par- ticular player's repertoire. In any ‘case, most players adjust their reper- toires continually, so it’s best to be ready for anything, ‘The Queen's Gambit at Club ‘and at International level It does not take a great deal of re search to reveal that these are two entirely different animals. To risk a gross generalization: 1) At international level, the Queen's Gambit is viewed asa solid classical structure, from which Black will aim to strike quickly at White's position to force simplifica- tion and equality, or else dynamic counterplay. Those with Black will know a good deal of theory, and ‘many wicks, ready to pounce on the slightest inaccuracy from White to ease their task. The most popular lines are the Semi-Slav, Slav, QGA, and in the Orthodox, the Tartakower (fallowed), Introduction 7 2) At club level, the Queen's Gambit is defended ‘by those who wish to obtain a solid position, and avoid early accidents. Counter- stikes against White's position are cerried out when essential, rather tun as a matter of course. Black's defence tends to be carried out on general principles rather than spe- cific knowledge. The most popular lige is the Orthodox, with the ‘Abd systems and the Cambridge ‘Springs top of the popularity table. Naturally there are plenty of ex- ceptions, e.g. club players who are upto the minute with Shirov's Semi- Slav analysis, and masters who are ceentent to sit on a solid, passive po- siion. Nevertheless, the above con- siderations will hopefully be of use toplayers wondering which parts of the book to study in most detail ‘We have certainly not skimped on the coverage of lines topical at in- emnational level (especially since, after a suitable time delay, the top players’ preferences soep down to club level), but have taken pains to give space to lines we know to be popular amongst club players, even though a glance at Informator or a sweep through ChessBase suggests hardly anyone plays them. Thus sgambits such as the Albin and Hen- nig-Schara receive full coverage, ard a great deal of spuce is devoted to the solid Orthodox systems — too passive for most top players, but a ‘reat favourite with club players for ‘whom it is perhaps important to avoid losing in matches, or who8 Introduction don't mind coming under attack, ex- perience telling them that these at- tacks may not be so well organized as those which would put Grand masters off defending these lines against their peers ‘And finally. We would like to acknowledge the assistance given by the following people: GM John Nunn, who in the course of his superb typesetting of Symbols 1H Bxcellent move 1 Good move 12 Interesting move 2! Dubious move 2 Bad move 7 Blunder White is winning White is much better White is slightly better Equal position Unclear position Black is slighty beter Black is much better Black is winning Intending this book, came up with numerous analytical suggestions, Niels Hoj- gaard and Skakklub Sydestfyn, for bringing the authors together in the first place. Thorbjérn Rosenlund (Skakbladet) for providing the pho- tographs for the back cover, and all of my (GB) colleagues at Batsford who always put in so much pains ‘aking work behind the scenes to en- sure the books come out in such ood order. Graham Burgess Steffen Pedersen London Stenstrup August 1994 OL Olympiad Ch Championship Weh World Championship Echt European Team Championship Z ~~ Zonal TZ Inerzonal Ct Candidates event jf Junior event wom Women's event mem Memorial event sim Simultaneous game tpd— Rapidplay game Corr Postal game @) Third match game (D) Diagram follows 1 Exchange Variation versus 3...A£6 Exchanging on d5 elears up the con- tral tension at a stroke, and leads to positions in which both sides’ strate- gies are rather more clear-cut than normal, Until relatively recently, White ‘would normally play in very classi- cal style, carrying out a ‘minority attack’ by advancing his b-pawn in the hope of causing some weak- nesses in Black's qucenside. TI very well motivated positionally, though Black's means of obtaining counterplay have become well ‘worked-out over the years, making ‘White's task quite arduous to say the Teast. In recent practice White has en- Joyed considerable success with a ‘completely different strategy. By de- veloping the king’s knight to €2 fol- lowed by kingside castling, White twies to break through in the centre with £3 and e4. This has proved to be very difficult for Black to handle ~ he must wait patiently for his chance to strike back ‘To get down to the details after 4 exd5 exd5 5 ApS 66, most games continue 6 We2 e7 7 03 of 6 3 eT 7 We2, though White's deci- sion at move six is not a trivial one, since 6 3 can be met by 6...5, and 6 We2 by 6...0a6, should Black wish to avoid the main lines. Those ideas, and other early deviations, are iseussedin Game | Game 2 features some attempts ty Black to delay casting and in- stead manoeuvre his minor pieces, with a view to some helpful ex: dhangos. The main line is discussed in Game 3, with the focus on the afore- rnentioned scheme of Ze? and ex- randing in the centre Game 1 Zsu.Polgar ~ Bonsch Dortmund 1990 1 a4 a 2 6 323 a6 4 exdS —exds 5 295 (D)10. Exchange Variation versus 3..2Y6 Exchange Variation versus 3.26 1 ‘The basic position of the Ex 1987) 15 Sxe7 Bxe7 16 Wa2 b6?! Sixo7 WxeT 20 Dxd5 cxd5? 21 E16 developments easier after7...,L06 8 change Variation. The pawn struc: 17 Bad] and White was much bettcr. and White is more or less winning; 2x16 Wri6 9 Wri6 exf6 10 D3 ture dictates that White should play 6 3 Koually-Piket, Cannes 1990) 8 Wa2 7 11 Ld3 Dbs 120.0-00.0.013, either fora minority atack ora grad When White wants to avoid the $1159 Bel a5 1003 a6 11 Bxa6!? Ded she7 14 3 De8 15 De DUG ual central mobilization, whilst system with ..f0f5 then 6 We2 is Bab 12 Dge2 Sic 13.Dg3 e614 16 p4 ed 17 Hal La6 18 Oh Black will look to use the half-open moze precise. White will answer Dat Da7 15 xcT WreT 16 0-0 Karpov-Vaganian, USSR Ch (Mos- efile as a Jaunch-pad for piece-pay 6..g6 with 7e3 when 7,45 8 W3 with a small edge for White; Zbger- cow) 1988, whilst 7..Wb6? 8 Wxt5 oon the kingsi is good for White, Black's alterna- King, Bern 1988. ‘Wao2 9 We8+ soe7 10 Bb1 Wac3+ 5 6 tive to transposing to the main line 6 eT I sbdl leaves the black king in Usually Black plays ..c6 at this (ie. 6,67 7 We2) is 6..2)a6 (D) Black may instead ty two radi severe dificules) 8 Sxt6 Wxf6 point, but it is also possible to leave intending ...2\b4: cally different approaches to benefit (keeping the queens on the board it out for a while, e.g, SuSte7 6 €3 {from White not having put his queen is definitely to White’s benefit: ‘®bd7 7 23 and now: onc2: f...gxf6 9 Wdl! Wb6 10 Wd2 a6 2) 7.088 will normally ans |, & Wee, a) 6..Wb6 gives White a fairly 11 D£3 0-0-0 12 a3 De 13 ba + pose to lines dealt with in the notes a pleasant choice: ewosian-Barcza, Budapest 1955) 9 to Game 2. b) 70-0 8 Dge? He8 9 0.0018 will often lead to Game 3, though it Kasparov-Short, London PCA. Wet (15) 1993, Kasparov gave the move order independent significance: 10 bb! a6 (in Gutman-Razuvaev, USSR al) 7 We2 e4 8 64 Da6 913 WrK6 gxf6 10 ded? (centralizing the (9 @xe4 Db4 10 Wo1 dxe4 11 king immediately seems to be the Wred+ Le6 12 Dh37! (12 Ded is test way to play foran edge; after 10, beter) 12...2xa2! F Skomorokhin- Hdl @d7 11 Ad3 Ab6 12 gc? S.lvanov, Katowice 1993) 9.,{6 47 13 e4 dros 14 xed He8 Black 10Wa2 Be7 11 £03.27 12€ge2 tad a least equalized in ‘Timman- £513 Le5 Xc6 14 Di4z Stohl-Efi- Short, San Lorenzo Ct (5) 1993) a eee 1976 Black achieved an equal posi- —si_fa S ) a) ‘mov, Hradec Kralove 1988. 10.347 11 d3 (11 hd Db6 tion after 10,.ixb4?1 11 Sixt6 gxt6 a3) 7 Wa2 ed 8 Dred dxe4 9 {11_-h5) 12.h5 65 13 b3 {maybe (11..Wxt6 12 @xd5 4) 12 Wd32! a) 7-a3 De7 8 63 Deb 9 ng Be2 He6 1083 Lb4 11 Le? Was 13 dd is better) 13..He8 14 s3 xc} 13 Dxc3 06 but Kasparov's Ge? 10 Sd3 g6 11 Dge2 (11 BB 12 Sift ©d7 13 0-0 d6 14 We2 a3 15 Ra} Rxd3 16 sexds RD2 intention was to play 12 Bxds! 2g? 124.8457 (12.06) 13 bS!+ ixc3 15 bxc3 DdS 16 Wred @xc3_ 17 Hel Mxc3 18 &xc3 De8 = Wrds 13 Wad, eg. 13...0h3 14H Vaganian-Westerinen, Moscow 17 We2 Oxe2+ 18 Wxe2 £ Knaak- Vaiser-Ruban, Novosibirsk 1993) WaS 15 Wra5 SxaS 16 @xh3 De6 1982) 11,..0g7 12 13 AS 13 2 Fuibisovich, Berlin 1989, Y (Black deviates from the | 17 Brat + or 13..f0c7 14 Wre8 5 14 p4!? Odd 15 xd cxdd 16 23) 7 B31? is an interesting much-quoted game Geller-de Greil, | in3 15 B41, as pointed out by Watt 247 17 Wedd 0-0 18 0-0 and ‘gambit but it needs more testing in Havana 1966 which continued Dvoretsky in Secrets of Chess Tac- White has the better chances be- practice before a conclusion can be 11...d6 12 h4 hS 13 @ge2 #) and | ties) 11 a3! (11 a4? S@xb4) 11.uc6 cause of the pressure against the d5- drawn, 7..Wxb2 8 Dge? £07 90.0 row: 12 We2 96 13 13 Qe6 [4 Bhd GhS pawn; Tisdall-G Garcia, Manila OL 0.010 ef dxed 11 @xe4 Dbd7 12 bl) 12 AVP (it is hard to be- (Gurangely enough, 14..27 15 12 1992. ®2g3 gave White some compensa- lieve that this is the best square for 3 16 h3 Qh 17 ed und 18 Wa2 —_b) 7 3 (White simply ignores tion in Scherbakov-S.ivanoy, Po- the knight) 12...006 13 D3 7 14 Sixi2t 19 Bxf2 hé 20 dic? h5 21 the “threat’)7.,.b4 (7.27 is too dolsk 1992. Bel (14 Bhd is more logical) Bra Gat 22. Wats WS 23 Wa2 passive: 8.243 S07 9 Dge2 Des 10 b) 6.885 (Black is willing o let 14...&b4!. Exchanging the dark- B06 24 05 WaT 25 Dad D3 26 Lhd g6 11 13 0.0 12.0.0 b6 13 hl his pawns become weakened in re- squared bishop for one of the white We5 Whs 27 £4 + occurred in Kas- SAb7 14 Had Hes 15 Wel HoT 16 tum for the bishop pair and simpli-_ knights is a part of Black's system. paroy-Beliavsky, Moscow TV spd ef dxod 17 fxe4 Ba7 18 e5 Od 19 fication) 7 W13 Lg6 (White's The continuation shows that Black's12. Exchange Variation versus 3.25 position can be quite viable, despite his ugly-looking pawns, if White fails to establish a grip early on. 15 Ded Sxc3+ 16 exc} eB 17 Bae ®d6 18 13 Bhe8 19 He? He7 20 Ehel Zae8 Ivanchuk-Shor, Linares 1992. The game has tumed out to be a big fight Lor the e4-square, in which Black can hold his own, 12) 12 Fal? looks better, as does 3) 12D ged, 7 Wed agh2t (D) ka We x ar haba ‘This dubious move intends har- ‘monious qucenside development, so ‘one should know what to do against this. 7..Ae4? would be a terrible mistake since 8 xe7 WoT 9 Dxd5! wins a pawn. For 7..2bd7 see Game 2, and for 70-0, Game 3 8 Oper Best according to ECO, but White may also try a) 83 BS 9 £417 h6 10 xi Bxf6 11 94 96 12 15 Shae 13 Sbd2 SH7 14 BB 0-0 15 a3 Bes 16 Hafl a7 17 Wal bs 18 xh Wah 19 Hr4 Was 20 hd 16 21 Wet with better chances for White: Viadimizov-Rubel, USSR 1962. b) 8 2d3 Abd7 9 h3 Res (9.-lihS? 10 £41) 10 Dge2 h6 11 ibd DhS 12 Qxe7 Wre7 13 0-0-0 ps 14 bi £ Vaganian-Short, Skellie 1989, s. xed 8..Lh5 is logical, but in Lazarev- Korclov, USSR 1960 White ob- tained a good position after 9 Af 2.96 10 Zixg6 bxg6 11 Sd3 Dbd7 1200-0 @f8 13 Wad+, 9 Bxe2 ®bdT 10 0-0 0-0 M1 &d3 | Ee8 RB White employs similar ideas to those seen in the standard lines. Sooner or later he will play e3-e4 13 Ena ast Preparing ..c5, but its too slow. 14 Eadi Dee 14.08? 15 x16 x16 16 dres Bred 17 DxdSt 18 22 a6 Again 18.ueS? doesn't work: 16 Laxg6 hxg6 17 dxes eS 18 Dxds 16 of dxes 17 trot Dg 18 65 er Black naturally avoids 18..2)xf22? 19 Waid +—. 19 Rest eT 20 ht Dds It Black doesn’t take, then White will play Sgt and hi, 21 x2 | WaT 2 Ded BE 23 WHS wes 24 Wh5(D) has Creating a mating net: next will come DiG+! mw sehs 25 Hast ‘There is no defence: 25..f5 26 1h3 h6 27 26! Wies 28 Whe! +— 0 25..b5 26 O16! x16 27 Bh3 +~. 26 Ears 2646 We8 27 Dd eh7 28 Bh3 and 29 @ixh6 also wins. 26 yes 27 dyes Hes 28 Ext! EMIT 29 WT 10 Game 2 Kasparov — Andersson Reykjavik 1988 1.d4 dS 2 c4 e6 3 De3 D6 4 exd exd5 5 Sigs 06 6 We? S07 763 Tn ‘@Dbd7 8 fas ans (D) Black generally tries to exchange the dark-squared bishops at some point, so why not do it immediately” Exchange Variation versus 3..2Y6 13 Black may instead opt for the standard 80-0, which is considered in the next game, or manocuvre his queen's knight with 8.218, White can then try two set-ups: 8) 92013 De6 10 4 96 110.0 Dq7 (11.0.0 12 Babl Ded!? 13, x07 Wre7 14 h3 Dh 15 Boel 15 16 Be2 G7 17 td Dogs 18 Dxg5 ®xg5 19 £3 and White has the better same; Timman-Ljubojevié, Amster- dam 1986) 12 be! a6 (12...xb4? rns into 13 Bxfé Wt 14 @xd5! 4: 12..0-0 13 65 £5 14 bxo6 bxc6 15 e5 + Sicin-Rossetto, Mar det Plata 1966) 13 Zabl S15 14 a4 0-0 (14.Sixd3 15 Wrd3 O15 16 £xt6 x16 17 bS axbS 18 axb5 0-0, ‘Zeichik-Sveshnikov, Moscow 1987, 15 Biel +) 15 bS axb5 16 axbS Bc8 17 Biel Qxd3 18 Wrd3 O65 19 Bx16 Bx16 20 Dad! £ Novikov- Kharitonov, Sevastopol 1986 b) 9 Dge2 Deb 10 Lhd g6 11 0-20 (it is also interesting (0 castle kingside, eg 11 13 0-0 12 Hal Ze8 120.0 Oh5 14 S42 daha 15 War! Gini2+ 16 Hat 16 17 Se WeT 18h3 OhS 19 e4 + Chernin-Rogers,